Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Threatening or causing death or serious bodily harm (on person or persons), Threatening
or causing serious risk to health or safely of (the public or any segment of the public;
Willfully destroying the natural resources in land, water and air, such as forests or
marine and mineral resources, or intentionally causing oil or toxic spillages, or other similar acts
of destruction against the environment that threatens ecological security;
Unlawfully manufacturing, processing, selling, acquiring, possessing, using, diverting,
supplying or transporting chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear agents, or equipment and
instruments used in their production, distribution, release or spread that would endanger directly
or indirectly the safety of one or more individuals, or to cause mass destruction or great damage
to property; or
Any person who commits any act of terrorism shall suffer the penalty of life
imprisonment and a fine of Ten Million Pesos (Flip 10,000,000.00): Provided, That, if an act of
terrorism should result in the death of a person, or if committed with the use of uniform,
paraphernalia, communication equipment, or other implements peculiar to the armed-forces or
other-law enforcement agencies, or if the offender is a government official or-employee or has
retired, resigned, dismissed or otherwise separated from the government service, the penalty of
death shall be imposed.
Reactions:
The Anti-Terror Law must not be only a product of legislation, it should also be a call to
arms for national and international cooperation fighting a common enemy. It should be an
integral part of that call to sacrifice and valor and creativity to secure our borders and malls and
jeepney and tricycles from the terrorists.
Ah, but there is the problem. Only legitimate leaders, those with the implicit trust and
confidence of their people, can call upon them to make such sacrifices in the name of survival
against an implacable and dangerous foe.
Only true, tested and trusted leaders can convince their people to suspend disbelief in the
inherent, malevolence of statepowertowardspersonal freedom.
Without such a leader to implement a law of such precise definition as you suggest and
which I agree is needed, no amount of definition and distinction-making can possibly elicit the
willing and eager support of the population for the temporary curtailment of the full ambit of
their liberties and prerogatives.