Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Home
Recent Comments
cocokisses on "African-American Women: Where They Stand"
fala on "African-American Women: Where They Stand"
cocokisses on Should races mix?
fala on Should races mix?
mossimo on Should races mix?
Categories
dating advice and tips
Interracial Dating
Interracial Singles
Miscellaneous
Mixed Race Relationships
Online Dating
Race Relations
Racial Prejudice
Sex Stories
Success Stories
Upcoming Events
Dec 25 (21 days)
Christmas
Dec 26 (22 days)
Boxing Day
Dec 26 (22 days)
Kwanzaa Begins
Dec 31 (27 days)
New Year's Eve
Jan 1 (28 days)
New Year's Day
Ria Rodriguez
Your daily laugh in an interracial world!
Vote
View Results
My recent blabing
"African-American Women: Where They Stand"
Should races mix?
Is a cocky and funny attitude necessary?
Cord blood banking
Effects of interracial marriages on children
Is flirting worth risking it all?
The successful black man
Sexually Transmitted Debt
Love sees no color or Lust sees no color
Want to lose weight? Think again!
Archives
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
30 Nov
Some supremacists label interracial unions unnatural … they imagine that in some
way it's against God’s will. People have even quoted and misinterpreted the Bible
over this. However, if you read of the Bible well, the only type of warning against
interracial marriage is actually a scripture warning believers not to marry non-
believers.
So why should people make who is marrying whom their business? We are all
guaranteed equal rights so marriage between any two people in the U.S. or indeed
anywhere should be of no ethical concern. What was unethical were the laws
against interracial marriages in some States which were abolished at late as the
1950's.
These were laws enforced to keep one race dominant over the others… this was all
political (e.g. Nazi Germany, Chile under the U.N. appointed General Augusto
Pinochet, South Africa under Apartheid, and in many of the Southern states in the
U.S. [Dorfman].)
So it all boils down to one thing … politics and possibly class if you would like to
put it that way. It’s kinda like when you bring your girlfriend home, and your
parents refute your relationship because she is from a poor family. But here is the
thing, there is nothing unethical about interracial unions… its not like you will have
murdered someone by being in an interracial relationship. Its just a personal choice.
So let’s keep it that way.
Tags: black dating site, interracial dating site, black white dating
Posted on Friday, November 30th, 2007 at 5:18 am under Blog, Mixed Race Relationships, Race
Relations, Racial Prejudice .
1. cocokisses Says:
Of course the races should mix. I think God is getting the last laugh here. You
have Blacks and Whites who have big problems with racism amongst each
other, yet when they get together and make a baby, its one of the most
beautiful creations on earth. God knows what he is doing, and I think he
smiles whenever a beautiful bi-racial child is born
November 30th, 2007 at 2:40 pm
2. mossimo Says:
Much ado over nothing. There is nothing keeping us apart except for attitudes
and silly prejudices.
December 1st, 2007 at 9:36 pm
3. fala Says:
One correction Ria. The laws banning interracial marriage were not
overturned in all states in the 1950's. You're about a decade off.
Richard and Mildred Loving were married in 1958 in Washington D.C.
because their home state of Virginia still upheld the antimiscegenation law
which stated that interracial marriages were illegal. They were married, then
lived together in Caroline County, Virginia. In 1959 they were prosecuted and
convicted of violating the states's antimiscegenation law. They were each
sentenced one year in jail, but promised the sentence would be suspended if
they agreed to leave the state and not return for 25 years. Forced to move,
they returned to Washington D.C. where, in 1963, they initiated a suit
challenging the constitutionality of the antimiscegenation law. In March of
1966, the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals upheld the law, but in June of
1967, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled the law unconstitutional.
Thus, in 1967 the 16 states which still had antimiscegenation laws on their
books were forced to erase them.
December 1st, 2007 at 10:14 pm
4. mossimo Says:
I agree Mossimo.
December 2nd, 2007 at 11:31 pm
6. cocokisses Says:
Leave a Reply