Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Assignment
Compiled by:
Arjun Sawhney
102562332
Tax II
March 19, 2007
Prof. Jones
PART A:
PART B:
Federal rates:
$0-$36,378 = 15.25%
$36,379-$72,756 = 22%
$72,757-$118,285 = 26%
$118,286 and more = 29%
PART C:
Quote:
The “Corporation association rules” in the income tax act which apply in the
taxation of Canadian controlled small businesses are a necessary elements of
taxation in Canada.
The reason for this rule is to take advantage of certain boundaries and ranges for
the investment tax credit. Associated corporation not only means just the
corporations, it also means between individuals and corporation as well. In terms
of individuals, only those qualify who are related by blood, marriage or adoption.
Aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews and cousins are strictly not related. In associated
rules, one corporation has control over the other one and this is the key to
understand the relationship between them. The majority of number of voting
shares gives the power to a corporation. Three different types of test can be met
to find out whether the individual is related or not: control test, related test and
cross ownership test. I agree with this type of rule because of tax purposes.
When a corporation controls another corporation, they may not be a necessary
element but many tax advantages can be achieved. Nevertheless, as mentioned
not only the tests have to be made, but also the criteria. One of the two parties
will have to control the corporation either directly or indirectly, the controller must
be a related person and that person must own a minimum of 25% of voting
shares. By having those rules in placed, no other person can take advantage of
tax benefits, as they are quite strict. If a corporation shows a valid reason for non-
tax reasons to be a separate entity, it qualifies to be a deemed association. The
primary purpose is to foreclose the income splitting of a business into different
corporations. As per the controller, he or she is entitled equal to the percentage
of ownership. For example, if corporation A owns 76% of corporation B,
corporation A is only qualified to receive up to 76% from corporation B, whether
in profits or dividends. As corporations are associated for full accounting cycle,
they must include their worldwide income. There is a negative side to it as well.
Corporations are connected with each other and so their database. It is very
complex to track every single database and to transmit to each other. Asides
from accounting, there is a tax incentive to it and I strongly agree with this rule for
taxation in Canada.