You are on page 1of 5

Adjacent Channel Power Ratio Performance of a WiBro System

AHM Razibul Islam, Md. Rezaul Haque Khan1, Md. Rakibuzzaman Shah1, Ju Bin Song
Department of Radio Communication Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Giheung, Yongin, Gyeonggi,
Suwon, 449-701, South Korea, Telephone: +82-031-201-3277, Fax: +82-031-205-1775,
1
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering and
Technology, Chittagong- 4349, Bangladesh, Telephone: 88-031-714952, Fax: 88-031-714910
E-mail: razib3002@gmail.com, sohagiut@yahoo.com, tit_nu98@yahoo.com

ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing For next generation high speed mobile
(OFDM) is an effective multicarrier modulation communications, low power transmission is evident
technique for high speed data communications which for battery life of portable terminals, such as mobile
suffers from high peak to average power ratio phones and notebooks. Orthogonal Frequency
(PAPR). And Wireless Broadband (WiBro) is to Division Multiplexing (OFDM), as a Multi-carrier
provide high data rate wireless Internet access with digital modulation technique, proved its robustness
PSS (personal subscribe station) under the stationary against time-dispersive impairments such as multi-
or mobile environment, anytime and anywhere for the path fading and impulsive interference and therefore is
future 4G communication systems. Hence, in this currently in use by European digital audio and
paper, bandpass memoryless nonlinearity effects are terrestrial broadcasting and asynchronous digital
analysed with High Power Amplifier (HPA) for subscriber lines (ADSL).
Adjacent Channel Power Ratio (ACPR) performance But high peak to average power ratio (PAPR) has
calculation of OFDM based WiBro system. The become an important parameter to consider for
simulated performance of ACPR for this model is OFDM as nonlinearity distortion increases for an
compared with the theoretical performance for the input signal led to the power amplifier (PA). In a
Amplitude to Amplitude (AM/AM) nonlinearities with conventional class ‘A’ linear amplifier, power
additive Gaussian noise. The obtained ACPR shows efficiency is an approximately inverse linear function
good agreement with the theoretical performance. of the PAPR [5]. And this low power efficiency is
undesirable for mobile terminals. So, for power
Keywords- OFDM, WiBro, PAPR, Third order consumption issue, nonlinear amplification becomes
intermodulation, ACPR, Nonlinearity distortion, necessary. But, again, the in-band and out-of-band
Power spectral density. interference created by the distortion effects of
nonlinear amplification, increases bit-error-rate (BER)
and spectral regeneration (SR) respectively. So, a
trade-off is necessary between the degree of nonlinear
distortion and total power consumption. The degree of
SR can be characterized by ACPR and this ratio is the
limiting factor on achieving high efficiency
amplification [4].
High power amplifier (HPA) in the transmitter is one for larger n , s (t ) possesses a Gaussian distribution
of the main sources of nonlinear distortions inserted with zero mean. A block diagram of the transmitter is
into radio channels. In a bandpass memoryless HPA shown in Fig. 1. A data stream e(t ) will be split into
amplifier model, the relationship between the input
several streams and separate carriers will be used to
and output signal of the amplifier is described by the
transmit them. In our proposed model, total number
two memoryless functions, namely amplitude-
of bit streams is 64 and each carrier is modulated with
amplitude modulation (AM/AM) and amplitude-phase
QAM. Inverse Fast Fourier Technique (IFFT) is used
modulation (AM/PM) nonlinearities.
here which eliminates the complexity involved in using
a large number of oscillators. So finally, using the
On the other hand, the WiBro system, an official name
modulated narrowband Gaussian input signal shown
of portable Internet system in Korea and a stepping
in equation (1) we can write,
stone of the fourth generation mobile communications,
s (t )  x (t ) cos 2 f 0t  y (t ) sin 2 f 0t
is on the way of deploying commercial service in (2)
2006. The WiBro is a homegrown variant standard of  Re{ A(t )e j 2 f0t }  A(t ) cos(2 f 0t   (t ))
IEEE 802.16e which has, apparently, now been folded
into WiMax. It is designed to provide seamless Here |A(t)| is the voltage envelope of the modulated
mobile connectivity over the 2.3GHz spectrum at signal and θ (t) is the phase . The square root raised
ground speeds up to 60 kilometers per hour with an cosine filter h(t) is used here with roll off factor β and
average bandwidth of 16 Mbps. Therefore, OFDM is output signal of the IFFT m(t) will be passed though
a good combination for deploying WiBro system. the filter and finally fed to the input of the HPA
considered in our model.
In this paper, the ACPR performance of an OFDM
signal has been observed with simplified bandpass 2.2 Amplifier and Channel Model
memoryless HPA modeling of WiBro system
employing 2.3 GHz with a data rate of 16 Mbps. The modulated signal s (t ) is first amplified and then
corrupted by additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN)
The paper is organized as follows. In Section II, the with two sided power spectral density N0/2.
system is described analytically. In the next section,
ACPR performance is evaluated by simulation and A bandpass memoryless nonlinear amplifier model, as
compared with the theoretical behaviour and proposed for our system, will exhibit the output as
conclusion follows thereafter. follows when modulated signal in (3) is used as the
input signal to the amplifier,

s0 (t )  g ( A(t )) cos{2 f 0t   (t )   (t )} (3)

The functions A(t ) and  (t ) represent AM/AM and


AM/PM respectively. In a bandpass model, the in-
Fig. 1 Block diagram of proposed system
band and adjacent channel distortions appear due to
the odd harmonics only. And, we assume no AM/PM
2. MODEL DESCRIPTION effects in this paper. It is found by computer
simulation that the AM/AM effects are more
2.1 Input signal Model significant than the AM/PM effects [2] [3].
An OFDM signal s (t) can be represented as [6] We define the power spectrum and autocorrelation of
n/2 the input OFDM signal as S ( f ) and R ( )
s (t )  
i  n / 2
di (t ) cos[2 ( f 0  fi )t ] (1) respectively for the amplifier.

 S ( f )e
 j 2 f 
Where f 0 is a central frequency, ( f 0  fi ) is a R ( )  df (4)
frequency of i -th sucarrier and di (t ) describes 
So, the output of the power amplifier is obtained as
complex QAM symbols and n is the number of
subcarriers. Now, according to central limit theorem,
s0 (t )  g  A(t ) e  jf  A( t ) 
e j (5)
where g(A) and f(A) are the AM/AM conversion and
AM/PM conversion of the nonlinear amplifier for the
input envelope A. Autocorrelation of the output
signals is written as
Rs0 ( )  0.5E[ s0 (t ) s0 (t   )] (6)
Fourier transform of equation (6) leads to the power
spectrum for the signal component
2 2


1
S0 ( f )  S ( f )   {g ( s  )e jf ( s  ) }d 
2 2
e (7)
2s 0
Detailed steps of determining  and  s (which is
found by placing R ( ) =0) is discussed in [7]. The
third-order intermodulation component can be found
as:
2 2
 
1 1 2 (b)
( )  R( )[ R( )]2 3   2 (  2)e 2 {g ( s  )e jf ( s  ) }d 
IM 3
Rs0 Fig. 2 (a) OFDM input power spectral density
8 s 0 2
(8) (b) OFDM output power spectral density
The power spectrum of the third-order For numerical results with HPA we used the formula,
intermodulation is written as A
2 g ( A) 
1

 2 2
(1  A ) 2 p (1/ 2 p )

8 s 0
 2 (  2)e {g ( s  )e jf ( s  ) }d 
IM 3
S0 ( f )  S ( f )  S ( f )  S ( f ) 3
2
2
(9) (10)
f (A)=0 (11)
where p is the smoothness factor.

ACPR is defined as a ratio of the out-of-band signal


power in the adjacent channel to the in-band signal
power given as

f0  B f0  3 B


f0  3 B
S0 ( f )df  
f0  B
S0 ( f )df
ACPR ( B)  f0  B (12)

f0  B
S0 ( f )df

Where [B,-B] is the desired in-band, and S 0 ( f ) is the


power spectral density of the amplified signal s0 (t ) .

(a) In our simulation, square root raised cosine filter with


roll-off factor β of 0.30 was used for ACPR
calculation.

Table 1. Parameters for simulation

Parameter Value
OFDM Data Rate 16 Mbps
Number of Subcarriers 64
Carrier Frequency 2.3 GHz
Roll of Coefficient for 0.22
Power Amplifier
Sampling Frequency 10 MHz
Channel Bandwidth 8.75 MHz

3. SIMULATION AND RESULTS

Table 1 shows the simulation parameters used in the


system modeling.

8.75 MHz channel bandwidth was used for the


OFDM signal with a carrier frequency of 2.3 GHz for (b)
WiBro system. The Power Spectral Densities (PSD)
at the OFDM system input and output are shown in Fig. 3 (a) Simulated ACPR vs. Input Power at HPA
Fig. 2. From the Fig. 2, it is understood that the Output.(b) Theoretical ACPR vs. Input Power at
output PSD has SR which made the main channel HPA Output
distorted more due to adjacent channel nonlinear
effects. In Fig. 3 the simulated and theoretical ACPR versus
input power have been compared. As the signal is
passed through the HPA, some more distortions are
added in the system due to the inherent non-linear
amplification. Thus in Fig. 3 (a) approximately 22 dB
ACPR performance degradation takes place initially
(for input power 0 dBm) in comparison to the
theoretical one in Fig. 3 (b) for transmitting the
OFDM signal through the HPA which comes down to
approximately 5 dB distortion if 30 dBm input power
is applied in the system. Distortion difference becomes
almost similar for input power greater than 30 dBm.

4. CONCLUSION

This paper suggests a 2.3 GHz WiBro OFDM system


performance under a simulated environment with a
mathematical analysis of the nonlinearity effects due
to the HPA. The results showed important
(a) observations for measurement of distortion
experienced due to nonlinearity by the system
modeled. Maximum input power can be determined
from this work in the future that can be applied to the
WiBro system to meet the system specification for
ACPR and thus design suitable system with the fourth
generation wireless capabilites. In the future, AM/PM
conversion effects can be taken into account with the
fifth order inter-modulation effects to simulate a more
accurate system which can exhibit better performance

REFERENCES
[1] M.C. Jeruchim, P.Balaban, and K.S. Shanmugan,
Simulations of Communication Systems, Plenum, 1992.
[2] Le, M.T.; Thibault, L.,” Performance evaluation of
COFDM for digital audio broadcasting. II. Effects of HPA
nonlinearities,” IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting,
Volume 44, Issue 2, June 1998 Page(s):165 – 171.
[3] J. Boccuzzi, “Performance evaluation of nonlinear
transmit power amplifiers for North American digital
cellular portables,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 44,
no. 2, pp. 220-228, May 1995.
[4] Jun Sung Park; Sung Ryul Park; Hee Jung Roh;
Kyung Heon Koo,“ Power amplifier back-off analysis with
AM-to-PM for millimeter-wave OFDM wireless LAN,”
Radio and Wireless Conference, 2001. RAWCON 2001.
IEEE 19-22 Aug. 2001 Page(s):189 – 192.
[5] Miller, S.L.; O'Dea, R.J,” Peak power and bandwidth
efficient linear modulation,” IEEE Transactions on
Communications, Volume 46, Issue 12, Dec. 1998
Page(s):1639 – 1648.
[6] R. Nee and R. Prasad, “OFDM wireless multimedia
communications, Artech. House, 1999.
[7] Simbo, O., Transmission Analysis in Communication
Systems, New York: Computer Science Press, 1988.

You might also like