Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HAZOP
To determine: the hazards and hazardous events of the process and associated equipment the sequence of events leading to the hazardous event (scenario) The process risks associated with the hazardous event, the requirements for risk reduction the safety functions required to achieve the necessary risk reduction Allocation of safety functions to protection layers and for each safety instrumented function The associated safety integrity level (SIL) To specify the requirements for each SIF called SRS in order to achieve the required functional safety
MOL HCK
9. Verification
Definitions
Hazard: potential source of harm Harm: physical injury or damage to the health of people, either directly or indirectly, as a result of damage to property or to the environment Risk: combination of the frequency of occurrence of harm and the severity of that harm Tolerable risk: risk which is accepted in a given context based on the current values of society Safety: freedom from unacceptable risk Safe state: state of the process when safety is achieved Safety integrity: average probability of a safety instrumented system satisfactorily performing the required safety instrumented functions under all the stated conditions within a stated period of time safety integrity level (SIL): discrete level (one out of four) for specifying the safety integrity requirements of the safety instrumented functions to be allocated to the safety instrumented systems.
MOL HCK
Risk
Safety integrity of protection layers shall meet the required risk reduction!
Concequency of hazardous event Severity EUC risk Frequency Frequency of hazardous event
Non SIS risk reduction (BPCS)
Tolerable risk
MOL HCK
Hazard Class
Major
MOL HCK
Hazard Class
Major PL3
PL1
Frequency of occurrence
MOL HCK
Frequency of occurrence
MOL HCK
Tolerable risk
Risk cannot be justified except in extraordinary circumstances
ALARP:
Tolerable only if further risk reduction is impracticable or if its cost is grossly disproportionate to the improvement gained
Negligible risk
MOL HCK 8 Hazard and Operability Study - HAZOP
Layers of protection
COMMUNITY EMERGENCY REPSONSE PLANT EMERGENCY REPSONSE PHYSICAL PROTECTION (DIKES) PHYSICAL PROTECTION (RELIEF DEVICES) AUTOMATIC ACTION SIS OR ESD
CRITICAL ALARMS, OPERATOR SUPERVISION, AND MANUAL INTERVENTION BASIC CONTROLS, PROCESS ALARMS, AND OPERATOR SUPERVISION
PROCESS DESIGN
LAH 1
MOL HCK
COUNTRY EMERGENCY RESPONSE COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANT EMERGENCY RESPONSE PHISICAL PROTECTION HAZARDOUS EVENT ACCIDENT
LAH 1
PREVENTION
INIT. EVENT 1
PROTECTION LAYERS PL 1A PL 2B PL 3A PL 1B PL 1C PL 2C PL 3C PL 3D PL 1D
CONSEQUENCE 1
INIT. EVENT 2
HAZARDOUS EVENT
CONSEQUENCE 2 CONSEQUENCE 3
INITEVENT 3
CONSEQUENCE 4
TYPE OF RISK
ENVIROMENT ACCIDENT
CONSEQUENCE FOR POPULATION
MOL HCK
11
HAZARD
HAZARD: ENERGY OF POSITION
GRAVITY
ACCIDENT
RISK REDUCTION
MOL HCK
12
PR EV EN TI O N
CONSEQUENCE
INCIDENT
PROTECTION
OTHER PROCEDURES:
MOL HCK
13
FLOWSHEET OF HAZOP
HAZOP
1. Partition if process 2. Intentions of design Determine deviations (parameter + guideword) 4. Determine causes + frequency 5. Determine consequences + severity 6. Identify protections, safeguards 7. Recommendations, actions
8. Documentations
NO
Finish?
RISK ASSESMENT
Aims of HAZOP
Hazard & Risk Analysis: identification of the hazards and hazardous events (emergency situations) inherent in the process and its associated equipment as well as of the sequence of events leading to an emergency, the process risks related to emergencies, the requirements of risk reduction and the safety functions necessary for achieving the required level of risk reduction. Objective of the HAZOP: The hazard & operability (HAZOP) analysis is the structured and systematic investigation of some planned or existing technological process or operation with the purpose of identifying and evaluating all problems which may pose risks in respect of the personnel, the environment or equipment or may hinder the efficient operation of the process system. The HAZOP study is aimed at the discovery of potential deviations from the intention of the design as well as the investigation of the possible causes of these and the assessment of the consequences. Applied standard: IEC 61882: Hazard and operability studies (HAZOP studies)
MOL HCK 15 Hazard and Operability Study - HAZOP
HAZOP glossary
HAZOP worksheet entries: Node / subnode: A node is a specific location in the process in which (the deviations of) the design/process intent are evaluated. (e.g. separators, heat exchangers, scrubbers, pumps, compressors, and interconnecting pipes with equipment.) Design Intent: The design intent is a description of how the process is expected to behave at the node; this is qualitatively described as an activity (e.g., feed, reaction, sedimentation) and/or quantitatively in the process parameters, like temperature, flow rate, pressure etc. Deviation: A deviation is a way in which the process conditions may depart from their design/process intent. Parameter: The relevant parameter for the condition(s) of the process (e.g. pressure, temperature, composition). Guideword: A short word to create the imagination of a deviation of the design/process intent. The most commonly used set of guidewords is: no, more, less, as well as, part of, other than, and reverse.
HAZOP glossary
HAZOP worksheet entries: Cause: The reason(s) why the deviation could occur Consequence: The results of the deviation, in case it occurs. Consequences may both comprise process hazards and operability problems, like plant shut-down or reduced quality of the product. Several consequences may follow from one cause and, in turn, one consequence can have several causes Safeguard: Facilities that help to reduce the occurrence frequency of the deviation or to mitigate its consequences.
MOL HCK
17
HAZOP members
Practically in the HAZOP procedure the following members should be present as participants: HAZOP team leader (PROCOPLAN Ltd./SIL4S Ltd.) HAZOP secretary (PROCOPLAN Ltd) Operator (MOL) Maintenance experts of process unit (MOL) Functional Safety Engineer (FSE) and /or SIS expert (PROCOPLAN Ltd) Technologist (UTE) HSE
MOL HCK
18
HAZOP leader
HAZOP leader responsibilities: Defining the method and scope of the analysis Plans and scheduls the HAZOP study Ensures the data supply gets to the members Explanation of the applied guide-words and technological parameters Leads the team in the HAZOP analysis Ensure the results and recommendations are to be documented Ensures that the study is completed in the time and follows the progres of HAZOP study Ensures that the analysis thoroughly covers the process Prepares the HAZOP sheets and handles the HAZOP program Makes a report about the comments and notices Documenting the determined hazards, identified problems and recommendations Prepares the draft HAZOP report
MOL HCK 19 Hazard and Operability Study - HAZOP
HAZOP guidewords
The basic HAZOP guide-words are: Guide Words
No (not, none) More (more of, higher) Less (less of, lower) As well as (more than) Part of Reverse Other than (other) Early / late Before / after Faster / slower Where else
MOL HCK
Meaning
None of the design intent is achieved Quantitative increase in a parameter Quantitative decrease in a parameter An additional activity occurs Only some of the design intention is achieved Logical opposite of the design intention occurs Complete substitution - another activity takes place The timing is different from the intention The step (or part of it) is effected out of sequence The step is done/not done with the right timing Applicable for flows, transfer, sources and destinations
20 Hazard and Operability Study - HAZOP
Nyoms Hmrsklet Szint Id/ idzts Kevereds/ vegyls Reakci Gyors reakci Lass reakci Nincs reakci megfuts Gyors kevereds Lass kevereds Tl hossz tl ksn Tl rvid tl hamar Magas szint Alacsony szint Magas Alacsony hmrsklet hmrsklet
Nagy nyoms
MOL HCK
21
HAZOP documentation
Input documentation: Process Flow Diagram (PFD) Piping and Instrumentation Diagram (P&ID) Detailed technological description Operational manual Safety Material Data Sheets (SMDS) Risk criterias for people, public, business and environment. Tolerable risks (part of HSE policy) Logic Narrative, ESD system description Cause and Effect matrix (C&E) Output documentation: Introduction, methodology System definition and delimitation Documents (on which the analysis is based) Methodology Team members, sessions, attendance HAZOP report Recommendations
MOL HCK 23 Hazard and Operability Study - HAZOP
HAZOP worksheet
Eljrs ismertetse
MOL HCK
24
HAZOP worksheet
Munkacsoport tagjai
Munkalsek idpontjai
Rsztvevk
MOL HCK
25
HAZOP worksheet
Alcsompontok Berendezsek P&ID rajzok Vezrsz
Csompontok Eltrsek
Paramter
MOL HCK
26
HAZOP worksheet
MOL HCK
27
HAZOP report
MOL HCK
28
NODE-1
Subnode 1.5
NODE-2
PLDA
Subnode 2.12 Subnode 2.13 Subnode 1.3 Subnode 2.5 Subnode 1.4
29 Hazard and Operability Study - HAZOP
Subnode 1.6
MOL HCK
KEZDETI ESEMNY KEZDETI ESEMNY GYAKORISGA KVETKEZMNYEK KVETKEZMNYEK SLYOSSGA TOLERLHAT GYAKORISG BPCS (DCS) IRNYTS IPL & PFD ALARM + KEZELI BEAVATKOZS IPL & PFD
FSQA
KOCKZATI MTRIX
KVETKEZMNYEK SLYOSSGA
FSQA
SIS (ESD) AUTOM. BEAVATKOZS IPL & PFD MECHANIKAI S EGYB VDELEM IPL & PFD BIZTONSGI KVETELMNY SPECIFIKCI SRS
SIL?
MOL HCK 30
CSKKENTETT GYAKORISG
Hazard and Operability Study - HAZOP
PLDA
< 1 v C (II) C (II) C (II) N (II) U (I) A B C D E Kockzati osztly I. osztly II. osztly Magas Nagyon magas Nem elfogadhat Ms megoldst kell vlasztani Meghatrozott idn bell sszer kockzatcskkentst kell alkalmazni Nem kvnatos (mszaki s/vagy adminisztratv ALARP szablyozssal) Tovbbi sszer kockzatcskkentst kell Felttelekkel elfogadhat alkalmazni (mszaki s/vagy PLDA ALARP adminisztratv szablyozssal) Kockzat s krcskkents nem szksges Elfogadhat
31 Hazard and Operability Study - HAZOP
Szemly A (III) A (III) A (III) C (II) C (II) Ignyelt kockzatcskkents C (II) C (II) N (II) C (II) C (II) C (II) C (II) C (II) C (II) C (II) C (II) C (II) A (III) A (III) C (II)
Gazdasg
Krnyezet
Elhanyagolhat 0 Gyakori
Jelentktelen Jelentktelen Enyhe srls vesztesg hats Jelents Jelents Jelents srls vesztesg hats Slyos Slyos Slyos srls vesztesg (helyi) hats Hallozs, Nagyon slyos Nagyon tbb srls vesztesg slyos hats Tbb Katasztroflis Katasztrofli hallozs vesztesg s hats Kockzati szint Kockzati kategria
Kzepes Elhanyagolhat
Valsznsg
Meghatrozs
Iparban ismeretlen elforduls, a berendezs letciklusa sorn nem vrhat. Iparban mr elfordult, a MOL terletn mg nem, de a berendezs letciklusa sorn elfordulhat. MOL terletn mr elfordult, de a berendezs letciklusa sorn nhnyszor elfordulhat. MOL terletn vente tbbszr elfordult, a berendezs letciklusa sorn tbbszr elfordulhat. vente tbbszr elfordulhat az adott helyen.
PLDA
MOL HCK
32
Kvetkezmny
Meghatrozs
D E
PLDA
MOL HCK
33
Kvetkezmny
Meghatrozs
Hozam, energia vesztesg, kb. 25% bedolgozs cskkents egy kisebb zemnl (zleti vesztesg: 1 10 ezer EUR) Kisebb zem lellsa, 25% bedolgozs cskkents egy norml nagysg zemnl (zleti vesztesg: 10 100 ezer EUR) Vllalati imzst rombol, elltsban fellp minsgi s mennyisgi problma (zleti vesztesg: 0,1 1 milli EUR) Nagyobb zem lellsa (zleti vesztesg: 1 10 milli EUR) Orszgos zemanyag elltsban fellp botrnyos zavar (zleti vesztesg: >10 milli EUR)
Jelents vesztesg
Slyos vesztesg
D E
PLDA
MOL HCK
34
Krnyezeti kvetkezmny
Krnyezeti kvetkezmny, minsgi becslse:
Kategria
A B C Nagyon slyos krnyezeti krost hats, hatrrtket jelentsen meghalad kibocsts (mrgez gzmls). Kls (kertsen kvli) s jelents bels krnyezetkrosts. Jelents erforrst ignyl helyrellts. Katasztroflis kvetkezmny nagy kls krnyezeti krost hats, hatrrtket jelentsen meghalad hosszidej kibocsts (pl. HF, ammnia, knhidrogn mls vagy jelents lvzszennyezs). Nagyon jelents erforrst ignyl helyrellts. Slyos (helyi) hats Helyi (bels) krnyezeti krosods, vllalati imzst rombol. Korltozott mrgez anyag kimls. Jelents hats Jelents krnyezeti hats, hatrrtk feletti kibocsts. (ers pl. knhidrogn fklyzs). Idszakos krnyezeti hats. Nem jelents hats Helyi krnyezeti hats, kellemetlensg (zaj, szag, hulladk keletkezs). Egy napnl rvidebb fklyzs.
Kvetkezmny
Meghatrozs
Katasztroflis hats
PLDA
MOL HCK 35 Hazard and Operability Study - HAZOP
IPL requirements
IPL Independent Protection Layer shall be (acc. to EN 61511-3/F.9.): Specificity: An IPL is designed solely to prevent or to mitigate the consequences of one potentially hazardous event (for example, a runaway reaction, release of toxic material, a loss of containment, or a fire). Multiple causes may lead to the same hazardous event; and, therefore, multiple event scenarios may initiate action of one IPL; Independence: An IPL is independent of the other protection layers associated with the identified danger. Dependability: It can be counted on to do what it was designed to do. Both random and systematic failures modes are addressed in the design. Auditability: It is designed to facilitate regular validation of the protective functions. Proof testing and maintenance of the safety system is necessary.
SIL, RRF
RR(F): SIL: Risk Reduction (Factor) Kockzat cskkentsi (tnyez) Safety Integrity Level Biztonsgi integritsi szint
1 2 3 4 >=10-5 - <10-4 >10000 - <= 100000 >=10-4 - <10-3 >1000 - <= 10000 >=10-3 - <10-2 >100 - <= 1000 >=10-2 - <10-1 >10 - <= 100
MOL HCK
37
SIF1 SIF1 S1 SIF2 S2 S3 SIF3 S3 S4 SIF3 Logikai Vezrl (LS) FE 2 S2 S3 Logikai Vezrl (LS) S1 FE 1 FE 2 FE 3 SIF2
MOL HCK
38
Typical SIF
BSL
1oo2
MUV-002A/B/C (fg 1.)
BSL
1oo2
GSC
2oo3
1oo2
1oo3
8oo8
MOL HCK
39
Folyamat vltoz
BUMM
Standards
Felhasznlt rvnyes szabvnyok, rendelkezsek, utastsok s mszaki irodalom:
Seveso II Directive [96/082/EEC] 18/2006. (I. 26.) Korm. Rendelet: a veszlyes anyagokkal kapcsolatos slyos balesetek elleni vdekezsrl MSZ EN 61508: Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems, Parts 1-7. MSZ EN 61511: Functional safety: Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industries. Parts 1-3. EEMUA 191: Alarm systems, a guide to design, management and procurement No. 191 (Engineering Equipment and Materials Users Association) IEC 61882 Hazard and operability studies (HAZOP studies) IEC 60812 A rendszer-megbzhatsg elemzs mdszerei. A hibamd- s hatselemzs (FMEA) eljrsa IEC 61025 Hibafa-elemzs (FTA: Fault Tree Analysis) AZ EURPAI PARLAMENT S A TANCS 1999/92/EK IRNYELVE (ATEX137): A robbansveszlyes lgkr kockzatnak kitett munkavllalk biztonsgnak s egszsgvdelmnek javtsra vonatkoz minimumkvetelmnyekrl 3/2003. (III. 11.) FMM-ESzCsM egyttes rendelet: A POTENCILISAN ROBBANSVESZLYES KRNYEZETBEN LEV MUNKAHELYEK MINIMLIS MUNKAVDELMI KVETELMNYEIRL MSZ EN 1127-1: Robbankpes kzegek. Robbansmegelzs s robbansvdelem. MSZ EN 746-2:1998 Ipari htechnikai berendezsek 2. rsz:Tzel s tzelanyag ellt rendszerek biztonsgi kvetelmnyei NYOMSTART BERENDEZSEK MSZAKI-BIZTONSGI SZABLYZATA: a 63/2004. (IV. 27.) GKM rendelet s a 23/2006. (II. 3.) Kormnyrendelet vgrehajtshoz szksges rszletes mszaki kvetelmnyek Layer of Protection Analysis: Simplified Process Risk Assessment (Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) Concept Book)
MOL HCK
41
MOL HCK
42