Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The police basically is a backup force of the state administration. Its primary
functions are from en arriere. It is the backbone of the state administration. The police
is the enforcer of the rules and laws of the land and safeguards its compliance by all. For
this reason, the police can be rightly called as the guardian of the state administration.
State administration would be edentate sans the police with none to keep people on the
right sides of the rules and laws of the administration and make the state administration
more than mere paper-work. Even for the hoi polloi, administration is mostly police
functions and nothing in state administration holds its attention as much as what the
police does. The police is the most visible and the most obvious state functionary for
them, by its striking uniform and prim mien in addition to its availability as the dernier
ressort of the state administration. The police forms the cutting-edge of the statecraft.
The police functions as both the enforcer of the country’s laws and as the investigator of
the crimes. Ergo, the police both precedes and succeeds the law enforcement process and
ipso facto encompasses the whole gamut of the state legal system. The very fact that no
folds and rumples of the state administration are excluded from the field of the police
reveals that the range and scope of the policing is as wide as the administration itself and
often exceeds it. Take away the police, the state administration crumbles and collapses
like a messy mass without backbone. The sine qua non of the police in the statecraft is a
The inevitability of the police in the statecraft also renders it the most abused
setup in the spectrum of the tools of governance. Control over the levers of running the
administration. The explains the range of influence peddling and prolate pressures on
police transfers and keen concours among politicians and others to befriend the police.
The significance of the police lies in the lowest nature of the work it does in
contrast to the highest degree of awe and weight it commands among politicians,
administrators and the general public. The esteem, however, worked only to the
detriment of the police organisation. The propinquity to pamper the police while helped
the growth and expansion of the organisation, it certainly spoiled the police setup and
independent era for the simple reason that the propensity to paper the police saw
abnormal rise after the country’s reign came to people’s hands and politicking and
political cabals became the rule of the game. While friendly police became valuable
assets to politicians in the chess-board of the country’s politics, it became the mainstay of
the administration with the gradual fall in the skill and acumen of running the
administration. The police, which once in pre-independent days was basically a force to
keep the freedom fighters at bay and maintain law and order, became the alter ego of the
governance sinsyne.
The root of the problem lies in the civilian control of the police; this control
renders the police liable to function at the pleasure of the civilian authorities against
whom also the police are required to proceed as required by its professional ethics
being absolutely obedient to its political and civil masters, antilogous to being ever-ready
professionally to proceed against to put them in the gaol. This is an impossible position
for the police and against the tenets of the human nature. But, this impossibly
contrarious functions are expected from the police The problem is overcome by
advanced countries like the United Kingdom by strict adherence to the chain of
command with the head of the organisation responsible to the laws of the country while
civilian authority has to be contented with the administrative control of the police. The
However, complete insulation of the police from the civilian control may not be a
healthy development per se in a democratic rule. Here, the need of check over a
function through the bifurcation of operation and control processes in related job a la the
bifurcation of accounts and audit functions in accounts department come to the fore. The
wing of the administration. It is only the watchdog of the administration. This locus
standi of the police imprimis denies it any job, related with administrative decisions and
assessments. The police is there to obey the orders of the administrative machinery
above it to exercise control over it. A watchdog perforce indicates a master to rein in.
This nature of the police functions necessitates administrative control over it in the use
of force and other enforcement activities. This is the backdrop of magisterial powers
being denied to the police except where police commissionerates are organised. The
demand of the police to invest it with the magisterial powers is a corpus of the ongoing
dispute. The matter continues to be a contentious issue between the police and the civil
administration and a major source of dissatisfaction in the police force. The civil
administration is resisting a toute force any attempts to do away the magisterial powers
from its hand in favour of the police, it be in promulgating preventive orders or issuing
or initiating preventive proceedings or ordering the use of force, to name only a few. The
argument of the police is that the denial of the magisterial powers which are exercised by
officers as low as Tahsildars in the civil administration is a preposterous step sans any
rational basis and suggests lack of trust in the police organisation. The denial of the
magisterial powers to the police has nothing to do with trust or lack of it a la audit
control over accounts function does not suggest lack of trust in accounts. The police
have forgotten that the civilian control over the police is in step with well established
principles of administration and functions as a safeguard to the hoi polloi against the
destruction including death. Use of force by whomever it be, has a tendency to exceed
5
the limits of requirement and the plebeian has to be protected from such possibilities.
Ergo, the magisterial control over the police. It is a professional requirement in sound
administration rather than an issue of who is more trustworthy. The resistance of the civil
administration to the demands of the police for the magisterial powers is justified to that
extent. The police commissionerates are special organisations for special circumstances
requiring intensive policing under the closer scrutiny of the government in charge of civil
authorities. Yet, both magisterial powers and the police powers being invested in the
PROFESSIONAL POLICING
In professional terms, insulation of the police only implies insulation from the
political control of the police functions. Neither the magisterial control over the police
functions nor the administrative control of the police force by the civil authorities come
under the meaning of this concept. The symbion between the magisterial control and the
policing functions in one hand and between and administrative control and the
organisational buildup on the other hand is essential for a healthy police setup. The
symbion should stop here. Nothing more. When it comes to policing by the police per se,
professional police decisions sans outside interferences in any form. The police
organisation has to be built up as a system to achieve this essential goal to make policing
a professional, convincing and creditable job wherein there would be no scope for any
6
outside interferences in policing with the highest authority in the setup being responsible
only to the rules and laws framed for the purpose a la the policing system in Britain.
The position of the police as the enforcer of the laws of the country gives it an
important place in the judicial system of the country in enforcement of laws, preventive
measures and investigation of crimes and provides it a strategic relationship with the
dispenser of laws namely the judiciary. Though the judiciary has absolutely no say in
the organisational matters of the police force, it, if it so desires and have adequate
resources to do it, can have absolute control over the police functions as the police au
fond is the enforcer of laws and the judiciary is the interpreter and dispenser of the laws
and the synergy between the two functions perforce implies absolute subordination of the
police functions to the judicial review. However, this may not be the case in practice for
several reasons. One is the concept of judicial restraint. Another is the constraints within
which the judiciary functions. The other is the disinclination of the judiciary to interfere
discharge its cardinal responsibility of upholding the rule of law and justice in the
country.
In the spectrum of the state administration, the police enjoys or suffers a rather
polemic position defying many principles of the statecraft like the insulation of
legislature, executive and judiciary in the machinery of the state governance or the
7
compatibility between the constitutional rights invested with the importance enjoyed by
other hand is the best example of the unity of state administration, of the synergy of
various organs of the state governance. It, as an enforcer of laws, investigator of crimes
and an apparatus of state security, share a lever with all the pockets of the statecraft and
acts as the spinal chord of the government by coordinating the functions of the
legislature, the executive and the judiciary in establishing the rule of law. Its bonds with
the executive and the judiciary are equally strong and act as a powerful link between the
two powerful sings of the government. It is a string that binds disparate wings and
organs of the government together and give it a sense of oneness and belonging while
itself remains en arriere. This explains the sine qua non of the police in state
administration while denying it a ranking place as a governing body sui juris like many
other organs of the state administration. The police as a government agency represents
the driving force of the executive and the controlling device of the judiciary. It is the
working muscle of the government. It represents the law of the country and therefore
ultimately responsible to the laws of the country. While it is part of the executive, its
subordination to the judiciary and responsibility towards the law of the country raise it
above the scope of the executive functions. While it is part of the judiciary, its position as
a handmaid of the executive, spreads its role above the scope of the judiciary. Ergo, the
police is a government agency that performs functions both within and above the scope of
the executive and judiciary as well as the legislature. The police is a government agency
that performs functions both within and above the scope of the executive and judiciary as
well as the legislature. The police is part of all these wings of the government and
8
subordinate of each to them while outgrow each of them in professional discharge of its
responsibilities. What is required is the realisation of this sui generis position of the