Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Part Properties 3. Material Properties 4. Load and Constraint Information 5. Study Properties 6.

Stress Results 7. Displacement Results 8. Factor of Safety 9. Conclusion 10. Disclaimer

1. Introduction

2. Part Properties Part Name Mass Volume Weight shaft 2.par 107.657 kg 13743989.053 mm^3 1055035.329 mN

3. Material Properties Material Name Steel Mass Density 7833.000 kg/m^3 Young's Modulus 199947.953 MegaPa Poisson's Ratio 0.290 Thermal Expansion 0.0000 /C Coefficient Thermal 0.032 kW/m-C Conductivity Yield Strength 262.001 MegaPa Ultimate Strength 358.527 MegaPa

4. Load and Constraint Information Load Set Load Set Name Load Type Load 1 Force

Number of Load Elements Load value

1 353000.000 mN

Constraints Number of 2 Constrained Faces

5. Study Properties Mesh Type Number of elements Number of nodes Solver Type Tetrahedral Mesh 8,228 14,217 Nastran

6. Stress Results Value X 5.904e-012 -37.44 Minimum MegaPa mm Von Mises Stress 3.655e+000 37.74 Maximum MegaPa mm Type Extent Y 939.03 mm -635.97 mm Z 28.06 mm 0.00 mm

View Full Size

7. Displacement Results

Value X 0.00e+000 25.10 Minimum mm mm Resultant Displacement 1.92e-002 -46.13 Maximum mm mm

Type

Extent

Y -582.40 mm -1060.97 mm

Z 34.30 mm -10.01 mm

View Full Size

8. Factor of Safety Factor of 71.685 Safety Value

View Full Size

9. Conclusion 10. Disclaimer Important Information

This report should not be used to solely judge a design idea's suitability to a given set of environmental conditions. Siemens makes every effort to ensure that its products provide as much guidance and help as possible. However this does not replace good engineering judgment, which is always the responsibility of our users. A qualitative approach to engineering should ensure that the results of this evaluation are evaluated in conjunction with the practical experience of design engineers and analysts, and ultimately experimental test data. The results contained within this report are believed to be reliable but should not be construed as providing any sort of warranty for fitness of purpose.

Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Part Properties 3. Material Properties 4. Load and Constraint Information 5. Study Properties 6. Stress Results 7. Displacement Results 8. Factor of Safety 9. Conclusion 10. Disclaimer

1. Introduction

2. Part Properties Part Name Mass Volume Weight shaft 2.par 107.657 kg 13743989.053 mm^3 1055035.329 mN

3. Material Properties Material Name Mass Density Young's Modulus Steel 7833.000 kg/m^3 199947.953 MegaPa

Poisson's Ratio 0.290 Thermal Expansion 0.0000 /C Coefficient Thermal 0.032 kW/m-C Conductivity Yield Strength 262.001 MegaPa Ultimate Strength 358.527 MegaPa

4. Load and Constraint Information Load Set Load Set Name Load Type Number of Load Elements Load value Load Set Load Set Name Load Type Number of Load Elements Load value Load 2 Force 2 178000.000 mN Load 1 Force 1 353000.000 mN

Constraints Number of 2 Constrained Faces

5. Study Properties Mesh Type Number of elements Number of nodes Solver Type Tetrahedral Mesh 8,228 14,217 Nastran

6. Stress Results Type Extent Value X Von Mises 5.068e-008 -21.78 Minimum Stress MegaPa mm Y 939.03 mm Z -40.54 mm

Maximum

3.655e+000 37.74 MegaPa mm

-635.97 0.00 mm mm

View Full Size

7. Displacement Results Value X 0.00e+000 25.10 Minimum mm mm Resultant Displacement 1.92e-002 -46.13 Maximum mm mm Type Extent Y -582.40 mm -1060.97 mm Z 34.30 mm -10.01 mm

View Full Size

8. Factor of Safety Factor of 71.685 Safety Value

View Full Size

9. Conclusion 10. Disclaimer Important Information

This report should not be used to solely judge a design idea's suitability to a given set of environmental conditions. Siemens makes every effort to ensure that its products provide as much guidance and help as possible. However this does not replace good engineering judgment, which is always the responsibility of our users. A qualitative approach to engineering should ensure that the results of this evaluation are evaluated in conjunction with the practical experience of design engineers and analysts, and ultimately experimental test data. The results contained within this report are believed to be reliable but should not be construed as providing any sort of warranty for fitness of purpose.

Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Part Properties 3. Material Properties 4. Load and Constraint Information 5. Study Properties 6. Stress Results 7. Displacement Results 8. Factor of Safety 9. Conclusion

10. Disclaimer

1. Introduction

2. Part Properties Part Name Mass Volume Weight shaft 2.par 107.657 kg 13743989.053 mm^3 1055035.329 mN

3. Material Properties Material Name Steel Mass Density 7833.000 kg/m^3 Young's Modulus 199947.953 MegaPa Poisson's Ratio 0.290 Thermal Expansion 0.0000 /C Coefficient Thermal 0.032 kW/m-C Conductivity Yield Strength 262.001 MegaPa Ultimate Strength 358.527 MegaPa

4. Load and Constraint Information Load Set Load Set Name Load Type Number of Load Elements Load value Load 2 Force 2 178000.000 mN

Constraints Number of 2 Constrained Faces

5. Study Properties

Mesh Type Number of elements Number of nodes Solver Type

Tetrahedral Mesh 8,228 14,217 Nastran

6. Stress Results Value 1.395eMinimum 013 MegaPa Von Mises Stress 8.651eMaximum 001 MegaPa Type Extent X 32.93 mm -46.13 mm Y Z

-997.82 -28.06 mm mm 714.03 mm -10.01 mm

View Full Size

7. Displacement Results Value X 0.00e+000 25.10 Minimum mm mm Resultant Displacement 3.11e-003 -2.26 Maximum mm mm Type Extent Y -582.40 mm 114.03 mm Z 34.30 mm 50.00 mm

View Full Size

8. Factor of Safety Factor of 302.862 Safety Value

View Full Size

9. Conclusion 10. Disclaimer Important Information

This report should not be used to solely judge a design idea's suitability to a given set of environmental conditions. Siemens makes every effort to ensure that its products provide as much guidance and help as possible. However this does not replace good engineering judgment, which is always the responsibility of our users. A qualitative approach to engineering should ensure that the results of this evaluation are evaluated in conjunction with the practical experience of design engineers and analysts, and ultimately experimental test data. The results contained within this report are believed to be reliable but should not be construed as providing any sort of warranty for fitness of purpose.