The main problem oI the study was price varies among products especially when they are raised and customers seem to shiIt to other related products which are lower in prices. This aIIects customers who are loyal to the brand and the sales turnover oI the Iirm will decrease.
The main problem oI the study was price varies among products especially when they are raised and customers seem to shiIt to other related products which are lower in prices. This aIIects customers who are loyal to the brand and the sales turnover oI the Iirm will decrease.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The main problem oI the study was price varies among products especially when they are raised and customers seem to shiIt to other related products which are lower in prices. This aIIects customers who are loyal to the brand and the sales turnover oI the Iirm will decrease.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
PRICE VARIATIONS AND ITS EFFECTS ON SALES PERFORMANCE OF AN
ORGANIZATION: A CASE STUDY OF NEW KENYA CO-OPERATIVES
CREAMERIES NAKURU TOWN Kevin M Namukali cp12/60550/09 1ohn Wambugu cp12/60512/09 Sophia Gatwiri cp12/60477/09 Davis Chesimbili cp122/60354/07
Research Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Award of bachelor of Commerce
1uly 2011
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We Ieel greatly indebted to all those who made the preparation oI this research successIul. Much gratitude goes to our supervisor Mrs. Sirma Ior her endless eIIorts to guide in streamlining the project. This was not withstanding her tight schedule oI activities. We also thank Iriends, lecturers and mentors. They all gave us the motivation that was key to our achievements in writing this project. ABSTRACT The main problem oI the study was price varies among products especially when they are raised and customers seem to shiIt to other related products which are lower in prices. This aIIects customers who are loyal to the brand and the sales turnover oI the Iirm will decrease. To establish the relationship that exists between price variation and product branding with regard to sales perIormance oI the Iirm and to establish the challenges Iaced by price variations on product branding. The study was conIined between the month oI May 2009 and September 2009. This study was limited in that it only Iocused on the one organization. A case study research design was used and the organization provided the target population oI 125 employees. A sample oI 38 respondents was derived using stratiIied sampling method because it is suitable to include the elements Irom each oI the segments and it will enable to divide the population into subpopulation or strata. The questionnaires were personal administered and the validity oI the study was ensured through critical review by the research supervisor.. From the Iindings, it was cited that the Iirm should look Ior customers who are brand loyalty. Consumer can be categorized under Iour groups starting with brand switchers. Lastly, a suggestion Ior Iurther study was provided which was the Impact oI product branding on company`s market growth rate oI an organization
TABLE OF CONTENTS ACkNCWLLDGLMLN1 II A8S1kAC1 II I LIS1 CI 1A8LLS V 1 LIS1 CI IIGUkLS VI A88kLVIA1ICNS VI CLkA1ICNAL DLIINI1ICN CI 1LkMS VI CnA1Lk CNL 1 10 IN1kCDUC1ICN 1 11 8ACkGkCUND CI 1nL S1UD 1 12 S1A1LMLN1 CI 1nL kC8LLM 3 13 C8ILC1IVL CI 1nL S1UD 3 14 kLSLAkCn ULS1ICN 3 1S SIGNIIICANCL CI 1nL S1UD 4 16 LIMI1A1ICN CI 1nL S1UD S 17 SCCL CI 1nL S1UD S 18 1nLCkL1ICAL IkAMLWCkk S CnA1Lk 1WC 7 20 LI1LkA1UkL kLVILW 7 21 IN1kCDUC1ICNS 7 22 kLVILW CI AS1 S1UDILS 7 221 UNDLkS1ANDING kICING 7 222 SL11ING kICLS 7 223 IN1LkNAL IAC1CkS 1C CCNSIDLk WnLN SL11ING kICLS 8 224 Lk1LkNAL IAC1CkS 1C CCNSIDLk WnLN SL11ING kICLS 10 22S GLC8AL LkSLC1IVL CN kICING 12 226 LVALUA1ING 1nL CUS1CMLkS' kICL SLNSI1IVI1 13 227 DL1LkMINA1ICN CI kICL 13
228 CCNSUMLk SCnCLCG AND kICING 1S 2281 CCNSUMLk LkCL1ICN CI kICLS AND VALUL 16 229 IAC1CkS 1C CCNSIDLk WnLN kICING 17 2291 1LS CI kICING S1kA1LGILS 18 2292 SLLLC1ING 1nL kICING C8ILC1IVL 20 2293 SLLLC1ING A kICL ML1nCD 20 2210 LkLkILNCL AS A VALUL 23 23 CkI1ICAL kLVILW 2S 24 SUMMAk 2S CnA1Lk 1nkLL 2S 30 kLSLAkCn DLSIGN AND ML1nCDCLCG 2S 31 IN1kCDUC1ICN 26 32 kLSLAkCn DLSIGN 26 33 1AkGL1 CULA1ICN 26 34 SAMLING DLSIGN AND SAMLL SI2L 26 3S DA1A CCLLLC1ICN INS1kUMLN1 27 36 DA1A CCLLLC1ICN kCCLDUkLS 27 37 kLLIA8ILI1 AND VALIDI1 27 38 DA1A ANALSIS AND kLSLN1A1ICN 27 40 DA1A ANALSIS kLSLN1A1ICN AND IN1LkkL1A1ICN 28 41 IN1kCDUC1ICN 28 42 DLMCGkAnIC INICkMA1ICN CI 1nL kLSCNDLN1S 28 421 GLNDLk CI 1nL kLSCNDLN1S 28 422 AGL DIS1kI8U1ICN CI kLSCNDLN1S 29 423 MAkI1AL S1A1US 30 424 ACADLMIC UALIIICA1ICN 30 42S CSI1ICN IN 1nL CkGANI2A1ICN 31 426 WCkkING LkLkILNCL 31
432 CkI1LkIA USLD 8 1nL IIkM 1C DL1LkMINL kICLS CI kCDUC1S 33 433 kICL VAkIA1ICN AIILC1S 1nL SALLS LkICkMANCL CI 1nL IIkM 33 43S CUS1CMLkS kLAC1ICN WnLN kICLS CI kCDUC1S CnANGL 3S 436 nCW kICL AIILC1 CVLkALL SALLS 3S 437 CnALLLNGLS IACLD 8 kICL VAkIA1ICN CN kCDUC1 8kANDING 36 CnA1Lk IIVL 36 S0SUMMAk CI 1nL IINDINGS CCNCLUSICN AND kLCCMMLNDA1ICNS 36 S1 IN1kCDUC1ICN 37 S2 SUMMAk CI 1nL IINDINGS 37 S21 GLNLkAL INICkMA1ICN 37 S23 AGL CI 1nL kLSCNDLN1 37 S24 MAkI1AL S1A1US 38 S2S ACADLMIC UALIIICA1ICN 38 S26 CSI1ICN CI 1nL kLSCNDLN1 38 S27 WCkkING LkLkILNCL 38 S3 SLCIIIC C8ILC1IVL 38 S4 CCNCLUSICN 39 SS kLCCMMLNDA1ICN 39 ALNDIkLS Questionnaires i. LIST OF TABLES 8 1A8LL 31 1AkGL1 CULA1ICN 26 C 1A8LL 32 SAMLL SI2L 27 D 1A8LL 41 GLNDLk CI 1nL kLSCNDLN1S 29 L 1A8LL 42 AGL CI 1nL kLSCNDLN1S 29 I 1A8LL 43 MAkI1AL S1A1US 30 G 1A8LL 44 ACADLMIC UALIIICA1ICN 30
n 1A8LL 4S CSI1ICN IN 1nL CkGANI2A1ICN 31 I 1A8LL 46 WCkkING LkLkILNCL 31 I 1A8LL 47 IAC1CkS AIILC1 kICLS CI CUk kCDUC1S 32 k 1A8LL 48 CkI1LkIA USLD 8 1nL IIkM 1C DL1LkMINL kICLS CI kCDUC1S 33 L 1A8LL 49 kICL VAkIA1ICN AIILC1S 1nL SALLS LkICkMANCL CI 1nL IIkM 34 M 1A8LL 410 CCMMUNICA1ICN WI1n CUS1CMLkS WnLN 1nLkL AkL kICL CnANGLS CI 1nL kCDUC1S 34 N 1A8LL 411 CUS1CMLkS kLAC1ICN WnLN kICLS CI kCDUC1S CnANGL 3S C 1A8LL 412 nCW kICL AIILC1 CVLkALL SALLS 3S 1A8LL 413 CnALLLNGLS IACLD 8 kICL VAkIA1ICN CN kCDUC1 8kANDING 36
1. LIST OF FIGURES IIG 21 DLMAND LLVLL 11 k IIG 22 kLLA1ICNSnI 8L1WLLN DLMAND AND SUL (LUILI8kIUM) 14 S IIG 23 8kLAkLVLN CnAk1S 22 1 IIG 24 LkLkILNCL AS A VALUL 24
ABBREVIATIONS K.C.C enya Co-Operatives Creameries D.D Demand S.S Supply G.O.K Government oI enya
OPERATIONAL DEFINITION OF TERMS
Price is the value placed on a good or service by the Iirm at some point in time Break even analysis A point where total costs oI the products and total revenue are equal. Demand Quantity which the customers stand ready to buy at varying Prices, where all other conditions are constant Pricing Strategy is a method applied to marketers in order to come up with a price that is equal to service
CHAPTER ONE 1.0 Introduction The purpose oI this chapter is to examine the background oI the study, statement oI the problem, objectives oI the study, research questions, the purpose oI the study, the signiIicance oI the study the scope oI the study, limitations oI the study and theoretical Iramework oI the study. 1.1 Background of the Study Saxena (2004), price is a value oI a commodity or a service measured in terms oI the standard monetary unit. In comparing two quotations, price enables us to appraise the relative value oIIered by each supplier; thereIore Marketers should thereIore nurture it to avoid any disasters. There has been a growing interest in the area oI pricing more so because price represents the goodwill oI the Iirm. In corporate take- over or merges oIten the value oIIered to buy out a Iirm is much more than the book value oI its land, plant and machinery, inventory oI Iinished and semi Iinished goods/ products and the market value oI its shares The Iirms price equity is relatively new one and research is still underway. The interest in studying pricing equity is reIlected by the Iast growing number oI research seminars and papers in leading international journals. This chapter is devoted to understand price variation and its contribution to creating a competitive advantage Ior the Iirm. Cooper and leinschmidt (1971) Iound that products solely designed Ior the domestic market tend to show a high Iailure rate as opposed to the products designed Ior the world market. The Implication is that companies should adopt an international Iocus in designing and developing new products. New products are the centre oI attention in most companies because oI their obvious contribution to the survival and the prosperity oI the enterprise. These new products when matched to the consumer needs oIIer opportunities Ior a Iirm to strengthen its position in the existing product markets and moved to new ones. In the traditional channel system, members make little or no eIIort to co-operate with each other. They buy and sell Irom each other and that is all.
Forbers (1996) said that a Iirm might decide to go to direct distribution iI there are no suitable intermediaries available. Economists oIten assure that the customers have 'perIect inIormation about all producers and that the producers knows which needs what products, where, when and at what price. BeIore launching the product, the company can come up with advertisement billboards so as to prepare what would be customers Ior the launch. Stokes (1997) says that the demand Ior one product as a percentage oI the total demand oI the market is an expression oI that products market share. He went Iurther and says that competitor seeks to become the market leader by enjoying the largest share oI percentage oI a market. A large market share oI a product indicates a high level oI customer acceptance which in turn can give the suppliers several advantages. A company`s closest competitors are those pursuing the same target markets with the marketing mix strategy. SuccessIul companies design and operates system Ior gathering continuous intelligence about their competitors and must be alert to changes in what and how competitors are revising their strategy to meet those emerging desires and competitive intelligence system about which competitor to attack and which to avoid and how to balance customer and competitor orientations. The need to market overseas goes beyond marketing considerations Ior instance, presence in leading markets is necessary to keep track oI new technology development Ior tomorrow`s products and services. The global manuIacturing involves coordinating manuIacturing activities across the globe. The term imply the technology transIer that leads to some uniIormity in manuIacturing means specializing plants in diIIerent countries to play diIIerent routes in the global network. A common result oI globally has rationalized number oI components and parts among its various plants. Customers perceive a consistent diIIerence in an important attributes he Iirms oIIering vis- vis that oI its competitors. That is the diIIerences must be reIlected in some product/ delivery attributes which are key buying criteria. Product/ delivery even attribute such as availability customer awareness visibility and aIter sales services. Core competencies are the collective learning in an organization. It involves pooling oI diverse streams oI resources be it in the area o production marketing skills and technology areas. In an organization the technologist engineers and marketers etc. have a shared understanding oI
customer needs and technological possibilities. Care and competencies are the inner Iorce that binds existing businesses 1.2 Statement of the problem otler (2004), states that, price is the only element in the marketing mix that produces revenue, all other elements represents costs. Price is also one oI the most Ilexible elements oI the marketing mix. Unlike product Ieatures and channel commitments, price can be changed quickly. At the same time, pricing and price competition is a number one problem Iacing many marketing executives. Yet many companies do not handle pricing well. One Irequent problem is that companies are too quick to reduce prices in order to get a sale rather than convincing buyers that their products are worth a higher price other common mistakes including pricing that is too cost oriented rather than customer-value oriented. According to otler (2006), in any Iirm customers are the most important clients Ior the Iirm hence to main duty oI the management is to guarantee a long-term customer satisIaction. enya cooperative creameries keep on improving on the Iield oI advertising, technology and other outdoor sectors. However when price varies among products especially when they are raised customers seems to shiIt to other related products Irom other companies i.e. Tuzo, Brookside which are lower in prices. This aIIects customers who are loyal to the brand and the sales turnover oI the Iirm will decrease. 1.3 Objective of the study The main objective oI the study was to establish the eIIect oI price variation and its eIIects on sales oI private branding. i. To examine the Iactors that aIIect the use oI price variation on Iirms product ii. To establish the criteria the Iirm uses in determining the price oI its product. iii. To establish the relationship that exist between price variation and product branding with regard to sales perIormance oI the Iirm iv. To establish the challenges Iaced by price variations on product branding. 1.4 Research Question
To answer the above research objectives, the Iollowing research questions were Iormulated. i. What Iactors aIIect the use price variation on Iirm`s products? ii. What criteria do the Iirm uses in determining prices oI its product? iii. What is the relationship existing between price variation and product branding with regard to sales perIormance oI the Iirm? iv. What are the challenges Iaced by price variation on product branding? 1.5 Significance of the study The study will beneIit the Iollowing people: Top Management The top management will beneIit by use oI price variation media to promote their good and the company to be in a position to understand the best ways to reach their customer more eIIectively. Image building oI the organization is achieved through massive awareness oI both its products and services. Constant Ilow oI sales revenue is due to customer`s aIIordable prices oI present variety products in the market.
Organization The study will beneIit the organization in determining ways oI attaining customer satisIaction through eIIective and competitive price variations. It also beneIits to know and improve on how it can eIIectively satisIy and handle their customer by ensuring that customer care programmed is in place to highlight the Iailure and weaknesses oI management in provision oI good customer service and suggestion on the way Iorward. Managers The Iindings and recommendations oI this study will be useIul to the managers oI Company Ior developing suitable mechanisms oI determining prices oI products so as not increase sales.
1.6 Limitation of the Study In the wake oI increased demand to perIorm, the researcher experienced some reluctance Irom the management and employees to delay oI inIormation due to sensitivity oI the matter and a Ieeling that it was a Iault Iinding mission. To overcome this problem the researcher used an introductory letter Irom enya Institute oI Management. 1.7 Scope of the Study The study investigated the price variations and its eIIect on sales oI product branding, at New enya Cooperative Creameries. The study was undertaken between May 2009 and September 2009 using a case study was New enya Cooperative Creameries. The geographical location oI the place oI study was Nakuru and it targeted 125 Respondent and a sample size oI 38 respondents. The researcher sought to evaluate the two variables in the study that is price variation and sales perIormance. Questionnaires were used to collect the data. 1.8 Theoretical framework The researcher adopted the Microeconomic Theory by Marx which he said Adherents oI neoclassical economics, the currently predominant school, employ the theory oI marginalize, which holds that the value oI any good or service is determined by its marginal utility, the utility oI the "last" bought consumption good measured by its price, in satisIying a speciIic consumer's wants. While Marx emphasizes proIit maximization, neoclassical economists view the maximization oI utility at the individual or societal level as the driving Iorce oI the economy. Proponents oI the LTV would reply that as capitalism only recognizes demand backed by money then the price oI a good is not simply measured by its useIulness but by the amount oI money, consumers own - it depends on a pre- existing set oI relations oI distribution. These relations oI distribution in turn rest on a set oI relations oI production, which determine how consumers "earn" their money, capitalists "earn" proIits, workers` wages, landlords rent and so on. Consequently, the price oI an object depends not only on its useIulness but on the amount oI money diIIerent consumers have - their diIIerent eIIective demands. As marginal utility theory does not take account oI the eIIect oI these inIluences on price, it remains an abstract theory.
In microeconomics, this utility maximization takes place under certain constraints, these are the available amounts oI Iactors oI production, Ior instance, labor (as with Marx proIit maximization takes place under the constraint oI available production techniques and the wage rate). In Iact, the ultimate restriction is time. Households divide their time (24 hours a day) into leisure time and time Ior work. The household chooses that amount oI leisure time and (via working time) that amount oI consumption goods which maximizes its utility level. With Marx, working time is not based on a Iree decision oI households, but the outcome oI a class struggle between workers and capitalists, the Iormer trying to decrease, the latter to increase working time. According to marginalize, value is subjective (since the same item - leisure time, consumption goods - will have a diIIerent marginal utility to diIIerent consumers, or even to the same consumer under diIIerent circumstances) and thereIore cannot be determined simply by measuring how much labor went into the production oI an item. In the Pareto optimum, on the other hand, the exchange relations between commodities are not only determined by their marginal utility, but also by the marginal productivity oI the Iactors oI production available. This means that, in marginalize, commodities exchange at the marginal amount oI labor necessary to produce them. In this sense, an LTV, or, more precisely, a value theory oI marginal labor inputs, holds. However, this applies to all Iactors oI production and also to marginal utility. Labor is nothing special. That these several value theories can hold all at the same time is made possible by marginal analysis. The Pareto optimum is deIined as a situation where utility is maximized and at the same time all Iactors oI production are employed most eIIiciently, leading to a situation, where all commodities exchange at their marginal utilities and at their - marginal - amounts oI the diIIerent Iactors oI production necessary to produce them. In other words, iI empirically it was Iound out, that commodities exchange according to their marginally necessary labor inputs, this would conIirm marginal theory. It would contradict Marx theory, because according to Marx these exchange ratios are determined by prices oI production, which are generally diIIerent Irom the necessary labor inputs, the
labor values. Implicitly, Marx is thus denying, that capitalism is in a state oI Pareto optimality. CHAPTER TWO 2.0 Literature Review 2.1 introductions The main purpose oI this literature reviews is to identiIy and examine what has been done by other scholars and researchers in relation to the price variation and its eIIects on sales oI private branding . This review also assists the researcher to limit the research problem to deIine it better. A detailed knowledge oI what has been done helps the researcher to avoid unnecessary and unintentional duplication oI the projects, demonstrates Iamiliarity with the existing body oI knowledge, Iorm a Iramework within which the research Iindings are to be interpreted and Iinally to overcome limitations oI previous studies. Much oI this research mentions the strategies that Iirms use in determining the price oI commodities and how the charged price is perceived by the customer in order to make a decision oI by buying the production as pertain their brand. 2.2 Review of past studies 2.2.1 Understanding Pricing. Traditionally, price has operated the major determinant oI buyer choice. This is still the case in poorer nations, among groups and with commodity-type products. Although non- Iactors have become important in recent decades price still remains one oI the most important elements determining market share and proIitability. Consumers and purchasing agents have more access to price inIormation and price discounters. Customer put pressure on retailers to lower their prices. Retailers put pressure on manuIacturers to lower their prices. The results is a market place characterized by heavy discounting and sales promotion (otler, 2006) 2.2.2 Setting Prices
According to ibera (2002), price is the value placed on a good or service by the Iirm at some point in time. Pricing is a problem when a Iirm has a set oI prices Ior the Iirst time. This happens when the Iirm develops or requires a new service it introduces its regular product into a new geographical area and when it enters bids on new contract work. The Iirm must decide where to position its quality and price. otler (1991), says that, deciding the price oI a product is not just a matter oI recording production costs, adding the experiences oI operating the business and providing a seasonal proIit. The Iollowing Iactors are important to consider when setting a price. (i) The products Iashion and seasonal appeal. (ii) Competition (iii) Supply and demand Costs and experiences The manuIacturers and distributor oI a product involve many costs and experiences; these include expenditure Ior product materials, employees` wages shipping charges, advertising selling and business taxes. Competition from similar products Marketers are aware oI dissimilar goods and service and that customer might choose over their goods and services. Also retailers compete with other retailers or discount stores selling similar items at lower prices. II some retailers charge a higher price Ior an item and sell Ior less at discount stores, they must oIIer customers services usually not oIIered by a discount store that is credit or giIt warping. According to Philip otler and Gary Armstrong in the book principles oI marketing organizations set prices by selecting general pricing approaches. 2.2.3 Internal Factors To Consider When Setting Prices BeIore an organization set prices Ior its products, it must consider some Iactors within the organization that will aIIect pricing decision. These Iactors include; a) The company`s marketing objectives b) The marketing mix strategy c) The cost
a) Marketing objectives BeIore setting price, the company must decide on its strategy Ior the product. II the company has selected its target market and positioning careIully, then it`s marketing mix strategy, including price will be Iairly straight Iorward. Also the clearer the organizations is about its objectives, the easier it is to set prices. The company may seek additional general or speciIic objectives general objectives include:- i. Survival ii. Current proIit maximization iii. Market share leadership iv. Product quality leadership Many companies use current proIit maximization as their pricing goal. They estimate what demand and costs will be at diIIerent prices and choose the price that will produce the maximum current proIit cash Ilow or return on investment. A company might decide that it wants to achieve product quality leadership. This normally calls Ior charging a high price to cover higher perIormance quality and the high cost. b) The Organizational marketing mix Price is the only one oI the, marketing mix tools that a company uses to achieve its marketing objectives. Price decisions must be coordinated with product design, distribution and promotion decisions to Iorm a consistent and eIIective marketing program. Decisions made Ior other marketing mix variables may aIIect pricing decisions. For example a decision to position the product on high perIormance quality will mean that the seller must charge a higher price to cover higher costs. Companies oIten position their products on price and then tailor other marketing mix decisions to the prices they want to charge. Here, prices are a crucial product position Iactor that deIines the products market, competition and design. Many Iirms support such price-positioning strategies with a technique called target costing.
c) The Organizational consideration Management must decide who within the organization should set prices. Companies handle pricing in a variety oI ways. In small companies prices are oIten set by top management rather than by the marketing or sales departments. In large companies pricing is typically handled by divisional or product line managers. d) The Cost of Production The cost oI production sets the Iloor Ior the price that the organization can charge Ior its products. The organization wants to set a price that covers both its costs oI production cost oI distribution and cost oI selling the product and to deliver a Iair return the eIIorts and risks involved during production. Fixed costs are costs that do not vary with production or sales level. Whatever the companies output e.g. rent, interest variable costs. Vary directly with the level oI production, total costs are the sum oI the Iixed and variable costs Ior any given level oI production. Management wants to charge a price that will at least cover the total production cost at a given level oI production. 2.2.4 External Factors To Consider When Setting Prices The Iactors include the nature oI the market and demand competition and other environmental elements. a) The Nature of the Market The organization pricing varies with diIIerent types oI market. In a pure competition market the market, consist oI many buyers and sellers trading in a uniIorm commodity such as wheat, copper, or Iinancial securities. No single buyer or seller has much eIIect on the going market price. A seller cannot charge more than the going price, because buyers can obtain as much as they need at the going price and vice versa. II price and proIits rise new sellers can easily enter the market. b) The Consumer Perception When setting prices the organization must consider consumer`s perception oI price and value and how IE aIIects their buying decisions.
The pricing decision must be buyers oriented because where consumers buy a product, they exchange something oI something oI value (price) to get something oI value (the beneIit oI having or using a product). c) The demand When setting prices organization must consider the current demands oI the product Pricing decision should be based on demand to avoid over pricing or under pricing the relationship between the price charged and the resulting demand level is shown in the demand curve below. Figure 2.1 Demand level
The demand curve shows the number oI units the market will buy in a given time period at diIIerent prices that might be charged. In the normal case demand and price are inversely related, that is, the higher the price, the lower the demand. Thus, the company would sell less iI it raised its price Irom P 1 to P 2 in short; consumers with limited budgets probably will buy less oI something iI its price is too high.
d) Competition Another external Iactor aIIecting the company`s pricing decision is competitors costs and prices and possible competitors reaction to the company`s own pricing moves. BeIore setting prices, organizations must base its price in relation to competition existing at that particular moment. P 2
P 1
P 2
P 1
e) The Economic situation Economic condition can have a strong impact on the Iirm pricing strategies economic Iactors such as boom or recession inIlation and interested rates aIIects pricing decisions because they aIIect both the cost oI producing a product and the consumer perception oI the products, price and value f) The resellers Organizations must not set prices that will discourage resellers Irom selling the products. They must base their price in such a way that it will encourage resellers Irom engaging in business. g) The Government policy Organization must consider the government policy beIore setting price to avoid contradicting the rules and regulations put in place by government. In addition, social concern must be considered beIore setting prices. 2.2.5 Global Perspective on Pricing Due to globalization and improved communication technologies the world has become a small village and international trade has been made easier and possible international trade like any other trade Iaces diIIiculties when setting prices Ior products or services. Pricing strategies are major problems Iaced by all marketing executives around the world. International pricing is a complicated one by the Iact that an international business must conIorm to diIIerent rules making bodies and to diIIerent competitors` situation in each country. Also the Iluctuation in currency rates (inIlation) aIIects pricing decision. The country and the competition are both constraints on pricing decision. Each organization must examine the market, the competition and its own costs and objectives and regional regulations and laws beIore setting prices that are consistent with the overall marketing strategy. Prices international market is not curved in stones they must be evaluated at regular intervals and adjusted iI necessary. Similarly pricing objectives may vary depending on the stage in the product liIe cycle and the country`s speciIic competitive situation
2.2.6 Evaluating the customers` price sensitivity. A man who knows what inIluences target customer`s price sensitivity can do a better job estimating the demand curve that the Iirm Iaces. Marketing researchers have identiIied a number oI Iactors that inIluence price sensitivity across many diIIerent market situations. The Iirst is the most basic, when customers have substitute ways oI meeting a need, they are likely to be more price sensitive a cook who want a cappuccino market to be able to serve something distinctive to guests at a dinner may be willing to pay a high price. However iI diIIerent machines are available and our cook sees them us pretty similar price sensitive will be greater. It is important not to ignore dissimilar alternative iI the customer sees them as substitutes. II a machine Ior espresso were less expensive than one Ior cappuccino, our cook might decide that an espresso machine would meet his/her just as well Customers are less price sensitive, the greater the signiIicance oI the end beneIit oI the purchase. Computer makers will pay more to get Intel processor iI they believe that having 'Intel inside sells more machines. Demand backward pricing. This is setting an acceptable Iinal customer price and working backward to what a producer can charge. It is commonly used by producers oI consumer products-specially shopping products such as a woman`s clotting and appliances. Prestige pricing This involves setting a rather high price to suggest high quality a high standards. Some target customers want the best, so they will buy at high price. But iI the price seems cheap, they worry about quality and they don`t buy. Prestige pricing is most common Ior luxury products such as Ior, Jewelry and perIumes. (William D Perrault, 2003) 2.2.7 Determination of Price Saleemi (1997), suggest that price oI any commodity is determined according to the demand and supply oI that commodity. Price is determined at that point where demand and supply both are equal to each other. Quantity demanded and quantity supplied change with
price. The price which will tend to settle down is one at which demand bought and sold at this equilibrium prices is known as equilibrium output. Market is said to be equilibrium when equilibrium price prevails in the market. II the equality demand and supply does not exist then due to competition either between buyers or sellers prices will become equal to each other. It can be explained by the help oI the Iollowing diagram. Fig 2.2 Relationship between Demand and Supply (Equilibrium)
D S
E
S D
M Source: Saleemi et al (1997) P O
The above diagram used cloth as an example. At diIIerent prices oI cloth quantity demanded and quantity supplied will be diIIerent. At price 35.00 per unit, demand and supply both one equal to each other. So this is the equilibrium price. In the above diagram DD is the demand curve and SS is the supply curve. When price is $35.00 quantity bought and sold are 40 units. At price OP supply and demand both are equal to OM because supply and demand curves intersect each other at point E so OP is the equilibrium prices and OM is the equilibrium quantity. Similarly iI price is less than OP demand will be greater than supply and due to competition between buyers, price will go up. Hanson (1986) says that there are three aspects that determine price. These are; (i) Haggling. II there are Iew sellers and Iew buyers in the market, the prices at which the commodities will be sold will probably be determined by haggling. (ii) Sale by auction. Another method oI determining the price at which a commodity shall be sold is to put up Ior auction. In such a case, there is one seller and a number oI prospective buyers. The auctioneer oIIers an article Ior sale and asks Ior bid Ior it. Anyone desirous oI purchasing it is then at liberty to make an oIIer, and the article will eventually be sold to the highest bidder that is to the keenest buyer. The one prepared to pay the highest price. The actual price he will pay depends on how much the second keenest buyer is prepared to pay. (iii) OIIers at Iixed prices. These two methods oI determining price- private treaty or selling by auction are still in operation at highly organized who sale markets. Either methods oI sale can be adopted Ior consumer goods, particularly when the sales are inIrequent. Works oI art are oIten sold by auction. For consumer goods in regular demand, both methods oI sale are too cumbersome and would take up unnecessary amount oI time. 2.2.8 Consumer Psychology and pricing.
Many economists assume that customers or 'Price taker and accept price at 'Iace value or as given. Marketers recognize that customer oIten actively process price inIormation, interpreting prices in terms oI their knowledge Irom prior purchasing experience, Iormal communications (advertising, sales calls and brochures) inIormal communications Iriends, colleagues and Iamily members and point oI purchaser or online resource. (otler, 2006) 2.2.8.1 Consumer perception of Prices and value In the end, the consumer will decide whether a products price is right. Pricing decisions like other marketing mix decisions must be buyer oriented. When consumers buy a product, they exchange something oI value the prices ( to get something oI value the beneIits oI having or using the product) EIIective buyer oriented pricing involves understanding how much value customer place on the beneIits they receive Irom the product and setting a price that Iits value. Consumers will use the value oI the product to evaluate a products price. II customers perceive that the price is greater than the products value they will not buy they product iI the customers perceive that the prices is below products value, they will buy it but the seller loses proIit opportunities. otler et al (2006) states that understanding how customers arrive at their perception oI price is an important market priority There are three ways to achieve this:- (a) ReIerence. Prior research has shown that although customers may have Iairly good knowledge oI the range oI prices involved surprisingly Iew can recall speciIic prices oI products accurately. When examining products however customers oIten employ reIerence prices. In considering an observed prices customer oIten compare it to an internal reIerences (such as a posted regular retail price) (b)Price Quality inIerence. May customer use price as an indicator oI quality Image pricing is especially cars. For example, a $100 bottle oI perIume might contain $10 worth oI scent, but giIt givers pay $100 to communicate their high regard Ior the receiver.
(c) Price cues. Consumer perception oI prices is also aIIected by alternative pricing strategies. Many sellers believe that prices should end in and odd number. Many customers see a stereo ampliIier priced at $299 instead oI $300 a price in the $200 range rather than $300 ranges consumer tend to process prices in a leIt to right manner rather than rounding. Price encoding in this Iashion is important iI there is a mental price break oI the higher rounded price 2.2.9 Factors to consider when pricing According to Saxena (2006) the choice oI a pricing strategy depends on the Iollowing. (i) Corporate goals and objectives (ii) Consumer characteristic (iii) Intensity oI inter-Iirm rivalry (iv) Phase oI the product liIe cycle Corporate objective aIIect price decision while considering customer characteristics it is important to research whether customer spend time in searching Ior alternatives. This is because Ior some customers the cost oI this search is high but others it is low. II the search cost is low Ior the customer. Then he or she will be shopping Ior bargains and will look Ior discount sales. However, the same is not true Ior the Iirst group oI customers. Another characteristic to look Ior is brand loyalty. Consumer can be categorized under Iour groups starting with brand switchers. To endure a price strategy, it is high, it gives the Iirm a greater degree oI leverage but not so when is low. Thus, customer`s characteristics play an important role in stocking price strategies. Intensity oI inter Iirm rivalry within an industry also determines the leverage a Iirm has in pricing its product. Low intensity in competition, at times, results in a monopolistic market encouraging a Iirm to produce the product or the brand at premium. But iI the intensity oI inter-Iirm rivalry is high a Iirm has very little leverage and generally has no alternative but to price at a level which ensures survival. Price strategies also vary across the product liIe cycle and Ior the marketer it is important to know where his product is in its liIe cycle.
2.2.9.1 Types of pricing strategies Saxena (2006) says that a Iirm has diIIerent pricing strategies to adopt Ior new products. These strategies are:- (i) Skimming strategy This strategy reIers to a Iirm`s desire to skim the market by selling at a premium price. This strategy delivers results in the Iollowing situations, (a) When the target market associates quality oI the product with its prices and high price s perceived to mean high quality oI the product. (b) When the customer is aware and willing to buy the product at a high price just to be an opinion leader. (c) When the product is perceived as enhancing the customers status in the society. (d) When competition is non-existent or the threat Irom potential competition exists in the industry because oI low entry and exit barriers. (e) When the product represent signiIicant technological breakthrough and is perceived as a high technology product. In adopting this strategy, the Iirm`s objective to achieve an early break-even point and maximize proIits in a shorter time span or seeks proIits Irom a niche. (ii) Penetration strategy The objective oI this strategy is to gain a Ioothold in a highly competitive market. Another objective oI this strategy is to attain market share or market penetration. Here, the Iirm prices its product lower than the others in competition. This strategy delivers results in the Iollowing situations. (a) When the size oI the market is large and is a growing market. (b)When customer loyalty is not high, customers have been buying the existing brands more because oI habit rather than a speciIic preIerence Ior it. (c) When the Iirm uses it as an entry strategy. (d)When the Iirm is characterized by intensive competition (e) Where price-quality associated is weak. (iii) DiIIerential pricing strategy
This strategy involves a Iirm diIIerentiating its prices across diIIerent market segments. The assumption in this strategy is that diIIerent market segments do not commutate or have diIIerent search cost and value perception oI the product. In other words, in erogeneity in the market motivates a Iirm to adopt this strategy. (iv) Geographical pricing strategy This strategy seeks to exploit economic oI scale by pricing the product below the competitors in one market and adopting a penetration strategy in another. The Iormer is termed as second market discounting. There are three general principles on which strategy is based. (a) A Iirm should not discriminate between competing buyers in the same region. (b)A Iirms` strategy should not appear to be predatory (c) A Iirm should not attempt to Iix prices among competitors Ior basing point or zero pricing. otler (2004) says that pricing strategy is a method applied to marketers in order to come up with a price that is equal to service oIIered. He gives several methods to be used and is as:- Market skimming this involves setting prices oI a new product to skim maximum revenue layer Ior segments willing to pay high prices the company makes Iewer but more proIitable sales. Market penetration setting low initial price in order to penetrate the market quickly and run a large market share Discount and allowances it is a price where one pays less than the actual stated or quoted price. It may also happen that depending on how much one buys he is given some allowances. Promotional pricing- this is temporarily pricing products below the list price and sometimes even below cost to increase short run sales. Geographical pricing this is pricing a service or product depending on the service point geographically. When the service is located is what determines the price.
2.2.9.2 Selecting the pricing objective The company Iirst has to decide what it wants to accomplish with its particular product or service. II the company has selected it target market and market positing careIully, then its marketing mix strategy including price will be Iairly straight Iorward. At the same time, the company might pursue additional objectives. The clear a Iirm`s objective are the easier will set the price. Each possible price will have a diIIerent impact on such on objectives as proIits sales revenue and market share. (otler, 1996) A company can perceive any oI the major pricing objectives as- (i) Maximum current proIits, Many companies try to set the price that will minimize current proIits. They will estimate the demand and costs associated with alternative prices and choose the price the producers maximize current proIit cash Ilow or rate oI return on investment. (ii) Maximum current revenue, Some companies will set a price to maximize sales revenue. Revenue maximization requires only estimating the demand Iunctions. Many managers decline that revenue maximization and market share growth. (iii) Maximum sale growth Other companies want to maximize sales. They believe that a higher sales volume will lead to unit costs and higher long-run proIits. To set the lowest price, assuming the Iavors a low price, stimulates more marketers` growth production and distribution costs Iall with accumulated production experience and a low price discourages actual and potential competition. (iv) Maximum Marketing skills Many companies Iavors setting high prices to skill the market estimates oI the highest price on change oI compilation beneIits oI its new products versus the available substitute. The company sets a price that makes it just worthwhile Ior some segments oI the market to adopt the new materials (otler, 1999). 2.2.9.3 Selecting a price method
The According to otler (1999) given the three i.e. the customers demand schedule the cost. Function and competitors, the company is now ready to select the price will be somewhere between one where there is too low to produce a proIit and one which is too high to produce any demand. Competitors` prices and the price oI substitutes provide an orienting point that the company has to consider in setting its prices. Companies resolve the issue by the Iollowing considerations (a) Break-earn pricing. Your calculate the break-even point oI your business, the proIit at which your sales income and your Iixed variable costs are equal and set the price by adding a proIit margin to your unit price. (b)Contract pricing Viewing your competitors Ior contract can be risk. Your pricing will depend on what your proIit objectives and general understanding oI what your competitors are likely to oIIer your tender Ior a lot oI business and your success rate will be very high you might be oIIering your services or products too cheap (otler 1999). (c) Mark-up pricing The most elementary pricing method is added to a standard mark-up to Iind the cost oI the product. (c) Perceived value pricing (d)An increase in number oI companies base their prices in the product perceived value. They see the buyer`s perception oI value not the seller cost as at the key to pricing. They use non-value in the buyer`s minds (otler 1999). (e) Target returns pricing. The Iirm determines the price that would yield target rate oI return on investment (I) Going rate pricing The Iirms base its price largely on competitor`s price with less attention to the same market or less its major competitors (otler 1999) Berkowiz and Rudelius (2003) deIines price as money or other consideration exchange Ior ownership oI goods and services.
otler (2002) recognizes the Iact that whether price is raised or lowered the action will aIIect consumer distribution and suppliers it may interest the government. The existence oI more than one production point Iacilitates price discrimination between diIIerent geographical areas served as the price charged is important variable in proIit determination (Wells and Parker, 1997). The enyan government through the Act oI parliament seeks to control prices oI commodities. Price control act (1989) section 35(1) at the minister oI Iinance may Irom time to time by order Iix maximum prices Ior the sale either wholesale retail oI any good (G.O. ,1989). On the basis oI public interest rule, enterprise should set prices in order to reIlect the marginal serial beneIits Irom additional output and marginal social cost oI producing that output in private markets however the price consumers are willing to pay reIlects the beneIits they receive Irom marginal consumption. (Rudelius, 2003) Fig 2.3 Breakeven charts
Total Revenue Break even point proIit Loss zone Total cost
TOTAL FIXED COST
Source: ibera (1999) Price control
Price control means the state control on Iixing the prices oI diIIerent commodities. Prices are normally determined according to demand and supply conditions. . It is possible only where there is perIect competition and the government does not interIere. These days, the prices oI most oI the commodities are Iixed by the government. This situation is known as price control. Price controls are justiIied in the Iollowing i) Prices oI agricultural commodities Iluctuate to great extent. When the supply oI these commodities is too high, then prices Iall rapidly and vice-versa. These Iluctuations cause problems Ior consumers and producers. In such cases, the prices must be Iixed by the government to protect the interests oI consumers and Iarmers. Price controls can be applied to Iix the consumers to get these commodities at reasonable prices and similarly to ensure the minimum prices Ior the Iarmers. ii) Price controls must be applied to check the inIlation and enable the poor persons to maintain their standards oI living at a reasonable level. iii) Price controls are also justiIied to encourage the production oI import substitutes. It will help to improve balance oI payments. (Saleemi, 1987). Effects of price controls Price controls aIIect consumption and production oI various commodities. Prices oI essentials oI liIe like Iood, sugar, Iuel etc are Iixed by the government comparatively at low level to enable the consumers to buy these goods. This policy helps to maintain the consumption level at a desirable level. For luxuries, prices are normally Iixed at a higher level so that their consumption can be discouraged (Saleemi 1987). The prices oI agricultural commodities like, rice, maize, coIIee, tea etc are Iixed by the government to saIeguard the interests oI Iarmers. In this case, they become conIident that they can secure their income by producing these commodities. It increased the production oI these commodities. Price control on the import substitutes encourages the domestic and increases the overall production oI a country (Saleemi et al 1987). 2.2.10 Experience as a value
Saxena (2006) another approach to understand customer value is to examine a purchase situation as an experience. Implicit in this are two key situations. Value in purchase and value in consumption experience Value in use on the other hand is a Iunctional outcome. It is a goal that is in the experience a customer has in consuming the product/ service. In this seminal work the experience economy prime II and crilmore have concluded that companies need to Iocus on customer experience with their products and services, they believe that new competition is toady built around experience rather than tangible product Ieatures or intangibles. Like services alone customers` today pay Ior experience and not just Ior an acquisition or a service. The more positive and rewarding an experience is higher is the price the customer is willing to pay values which customer buys. Norman and Ramirez who propagated the concept oI value on stellation have concluded that the Iocus has to be on a value creating system itselI within which all economic actors ( supplier , business partners allies and customer value . this involves taking care oI the Iollowing: a) conIormance quality b) customer satisIaction c) market perceived quality and value relative to competition Figure 2.4 Experience as a value Value based price
Product quality
Service quality
Subsequent literature has shown that in contemporary marketing brands represents a set oI values that customers are willing to pay Ior typically, a marketer creates value through innovations, service, convenience in product acquisition Ior money propositions , thus, Value maximization triad
value maximization strategy is a triad with a value based price product quality and service quality being the three ends which are interdependent . 2.3 Critical review Lipsey and Crystal (2004), say that a basic economic hypothesis is that the lower the price oI a product, the larger the quantity that will be demanded other things being equal. They however don`t mention or state these other things which are equal. According to Hussein (1997), the lower the price oI something the more oI the people will buy. This law assumes that there are no oIIsetting changes such as lower incomes and lower prices Ior other products. These may be arising in the price oI a product or a service which may be Iollowed by rise in demand because oI perceived value which is associated with price. otler (1998) says that an organization has to consider many Iactors in setting its products price and Iactors are, selecting the price objectives determining demand estimating cost, selecting pricing methods analyzing competitors cost and oIIers and selecting the Iinal product. However this does not indicate why there are Iluctuations in prices by diIIerent Iirms or organization. 2.4. Summary This chapter has dealt with complex pricing issues Iacing the global marketer showing how institutional limitation constrains purely strategic consideration in pricing. It dealt with pricing issues which aIIects the purchase oI a product and the problems related to coordination oI prices. The institutional limitations involved in pricing included price escalations due to tariIIs, exchange rates problem and international credit arrangements. These Iactors combined to determine what the actual price oI the product will be when it Iinally appears on the market TransIer prices to local subsidiaries have various Iunctions in particular a role in perIormance evaluation oI the subsidiaries CHAPTER THREE 3.0 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction In this section, the researcher describes the sample and the data collection procedures. The Following are some oI the out lined subjects oI the study research design, target population, sample size, sample design, sampling. Procedure, data collection instruments, validity and reliability, and data collection method and interpretation. 3.2 Research Design This study adopted a case study method since the research involved price variation and its eIIect on sales oI private branding. This study used a case study design. contextual analyses oI similar situations in other organizations, where the nature oI the problem and public. 3.3 Target population The target population reIers to the group oI people or study subjects who are similar in one or more ways and which Iorms the subject oI the study in a particular study. The study targeted the manager, departmental heads and employees oI enya cooperative creameries. Table 3.1 Target population Strata Target population Manager 1 Departmental Heads 4 Employees 120 Total 125
3.4 Sampling design and sample size Sampling is a procedure oI selecting a part oI the population on which research is to be conducted. It ensures that conclusions Irom the study can be generalized to the entire population. The researcher employed stratiIied random sampling to the selected respondent because it is suitable to include the elements Irom each oI the segments and it will enable to divide the population into subpopulation or strata. A simple random
sampling was employed in every stratum to select 30 oI its population to arrive at respective sample size Table 3.2 Sample size Strata Target population Sample size Manager 1 1 Departmental heads 4 1 Employees 120 36 Total 125 38 3.5 Data collection instrument A selI-completed questionnaire were prepared and administered to each oI the respondents by the researcher and the staIIs oI enya cooperative creameries to ensure higher responses and completing clariIications. The questionnaires were the main data collecting tool. This is because they enabled the researcher to obtain in depth inIormation and clariIication Irom the employees, which could only be given in the questionnaires Ior secretive purposes. 3.6 Data collection procedures The researcher personally administered the questionnaires to the respondents and this was done aIter receiving permission Irom the institutional management to carry out research in the identiIied area oI study. AIter Iamiliarization data was collected Irom the respondents using questionnaires as the main collection tool. A Iollow up was made to ensure that the questionnaires are answered according to the research objective. 3.7 Reliability and validity Validity is the extent to which diIIerences Iound with a measuring tool reIlect true diIIerences among residents being tested. The purpose oI validity in the study was to seek relevant evidence that conIirms the answers Iound with the measurement device which is the nature oI the problem 3.8 Data Analysis and presentation
The data Ior the study was adopted and coded Ior completeness and accuracy oI inIormation Data capturing using excels soItware. The data Irom the completed questionnaires was captured, re-coded and entered in to the computer using the statistical package Ior social science Ior data analysis and interpretation. Data analysis and Iinding will be reported in chapter Iour. CHAPTER FOUR 4.0 DATA ANALYSIS PRESENTATION AND INTERPRETATION 4.1 Introduction AIter data collection, procedure the researcher dealt speciIically with data analysis oI the collected procedure. The researcher ensured that all the data collected, inIormation was close or near to the realized issue. This strategy was undertaken in enya Co-Operatives Creameries Limited where the target group was Branch manager Departmental heads and general employees. The research was done by administration oI questionnaires to the target groups which were done in a conducive environment in which the respondent could not Ieel intimidated. The collected data was analyzed and presented in Iorm oI statically tables according to the research questions. 4.2 Demographic information of the respondents The demographic Ieatures oI the respondents are vital to this study. They provide a base Ior Iurther analysis oI the speciIic research objectives and their Iindings using descriptive statistics, tables, Irequency and percentages. Demographic analysis is crucial since demographical Iactors aIIect respondents` social, economic political behaviors hence they are useIul tools in analysis oI research objectives. 4.2.1 Gender of the respondents The research was carried out to determine the gender oI the respondents as it plays a major role in employment in most organization. The gender oI the respondent was analyzed and results were tables as Iollows
Table 4.1 Gender of the respondents Gender Frequency Percentages Male 20 60 Female 14 40 Total 34 100
The results reported that 60 were male, and 40 were Iemale, this means those males are the majority oI the sampled respondents. The gender diIIerence in the organization was not high. 4.2.2. Age distribution of respondents The researcher sought to establish the age distribution oI respondents. This is a demographic Ieature that aIIects behaviors or perception oI respondents. It was important to assess the age oI respondents as this would aIIect the way each would behaves in the work place. At an early age, many people love to be stable and comIortable. People at diIIerent ages to think diIIerently and thus their perception diIIers. Data on age distribution is presented in table 4.2 Table 4.2 Age of the respondents Age Frequency Percentage Below 20 - - 20-30 6 17 30-40 16 48 40-50 8 22 Above 50 4 13 Total 34 100
The Iindings showed that 17 oI respondents were between 20-30 years old, 48 between 30-40 years old, 22 between 40-50 years old and 13 50 and above years. This indicates that majority oI the respondents are above 25 years. It will be interesting to see how age Iactor has aIIected the objectives oI the research. DiIIerent age groups
think diIIerently hence the query to the management diIIers. The younger a person is the higher the dreams and expectations. 4.2.3 Marital status It was also necessary to Iind out marital status oI the staII since this would also determine the commitment. This would also give the organization in terms oI seeing to it that the social responsibility oI the staII care oI. The marital status Iindings are as per the bellow Iigure; Table 4.3 Marital status Status Frequency Percentages Single 8 24 Married 26 76 Total 34 100
The table above indicates that the higher percentage oI staII is married hence indication oI positive signs oI social stability. 4.2.4 Academic qualification The research sought to establish the level oI education among managers and general employees in order to determine level oI understanding oI the nature oI their business and price. Table 4.4 Academic qualification Academic qualification Frequency Percentage CertiIicate 8 25 Diploma 12 35 Degree 10 29 Masters 4 11 Total 34 100
It was reported that 25 have certiIicate level oI education, 35 are diploma holders, 29 are degree holders, and 11 masters holders. Others still reported other
qualiIications such as, A-level, CPA and proIessional proIiciency. The result shows that majority oI the employees are well educated. This implies that most oI the employees do understand the kind or type oI environment they are expected to work in and what is best Ior the organization as pertains the allocation oI prices oI its products. 4.2.5 Position in the organization The positions held by the respondents in the Iirm are major source oI important inIormation since they are inIluential Table 4.5 Position in the organization Position Frequency Percentages Branch manager 1 3` Departmental head 1 3 General employee 32 94 Total 34 100
The results Irom the table shows that, 3 oI the respondents are manager, 3 are departmental managers, and 94 are employees. This indicated that general employees are the majority in the organization. 4.2.6 Working experience The research sought to know the number oI years the staII have worked in the organization, since this will indicate the exposure and experience that the staII has had in the organization and which may relate in the criteria the Iirm uses in allocation oI its prices on the product and how it aIIect the branding. Experience contributes to his competence on execution oI organization in enhancement oI their perIormance. The Iindings oI this enquiry are presented in table 4.6
Table 4.6 Working experience Experience Frequency Percentages Below 1 year - - 1-2 years 5 16
2-5 years 7 22 5-8 years 15 41 Above 8 years 7 21 Total 34 100
The results Irom the table indicated that none has worked Ior less than 1 year, 16 have worked Ior 1-5 years, 22 have worked Ior 2-5 years, 41 have worked Ior 5-8 years and 21 have worked Ior over 8 years. The highest numbers oI respondents have a good working experience as they have worked with the organization Ior more than 2 years which shows that they are aware with the organization requirement and the expectations required too. 4.3 Price Variations 4.3.1 Factors affect prices of your products The researcher sought to know the Iactors aIIecting the price oI the product; this is because price is the value placed on a good or service by customer at some point in time. Pricing is a problem when a Iirm has a set oI prices Ior the Iirst time. This happens when the Iirm develops or requires a new service it introduces its regular product into a new geographical area and when it enters bids on new contract work. The Iirm must decide where to position its quality and price. The Iindings were presented in table 4.7 Table 4.7 Factors affect prices of your products Factors Frequency Percentages Costs and experience 2 3 Competitors Irom similar products 14 42 Perception 7 20 Fashion, taste and preIerences 11 33 Total 34 100
The results showed that 42 said competitors Irom similar products, 33 said Iashion, taste and preIerences while 20 said perception oI the customers and 3 said cost and experience. ThereIore, it is evident that Marketers are aware oI dissimilar goods and service and that customer might choose over their goods and services. Also retailers compete with other retailers or discount stores selling similar items at lower prices. II some retailers charge a higher price Ior an item and sell Ior less at discount stores, they must oIIer customers services usually not oIIered by a discount store that is credit or giIt warping. 4.3.2 Criteria used by the firm to determine prices of products The researcher wanted to Iind out the criteria used by the Iirm to determine price oI its product, this was important because Price is determined at that point where demand and supply both are equal to each other. Quantity demanded and quantity supplied change with price. The price which will tend to settle down is one at which demand bought and sold at this equilibrium prices is known as equilibrium output. Market is said to be equilibrium when equilibrium price prevails in the market. The Iindings were presented in table 4.8 Table 4.8 Criteria used by the firm to determine prices of products Criteria Frequency Percentage Cost- plus pricing 4 10 Break- even analysis 14 42 Target proIit pricing 14 42 Quality oI the product 2 6 Total 34 100
The results showed that 10 said cost-plus pricing, 42 said Break-even analysis and Target proIit pricing while 6 said quality oI the product, Irom the Iindings it`s clear that the Iirm set prices to break even on the cost oI making and marketing a product or setting prices to make a target proIit. The organizations try to determine the price at which it will break-even or make the target proIit it is seeking. 4.3.3 Price variation affects the sales performance of the firm
BeIore setting price, the company must decide on its strategy Ior the product. II the company has selected its target market and positioning careIully, then its marketing mix strategy, including price will be Iairly straight Iorward. Also the clearer the organizations are about its objectives, the easier it is to set prices and also get a clear picture oI the overall perIormance. The Iindings were presented in table 4.9 Table 4.9 Price variation affects the sales performance of the firm Effect Frequency Percentages Maximization oI proIit margin 11 32 High cost oI production 18 54 Survival oI the Iirm in a competitive Iield 3 10 Status quo oI the Iirm 2 4 Total 34 100
The results showed that 32 said maximization oI proIit margin, 54 said high cost oI production, 10 said Survival oI the Iirm in a competitive Iield and 4 said status quo oI the Iirm. It is thereIore clear that cost oI production sets the Iloor Ior the price that the organization can charge Ior its products 4.3.4 Communication with customers when there are price changes of the products The Iound it relevant to Iind out iI the Iirm communicates with its customers iI they are price changes oI the products this because customer oIten actively process price inIormation, interpreting prices in terms oI their knowledge Irom prior purchasing experience, Iormal communications (advertising, sales calls and brochures) inIormal communications, Iriends, colleagues and Iamily members and point oI purchaser or online resource. The Iindings were presented in table 4.10 Table 4.10 Communication with customers when there are price changes of the products Response Frequency Percentages
Yes 27 78 No 7 22 Total 34 100 The results showed 78 said it is important to communicate to the customers when there are price changes while 22 said no it is not important. It is thereIore evident that Purchase decision one based on how customers perceive prices and what they considerd to be the current actual price-not the marketers stated prices. 4.3.5 Customers reaction when prices of products change The researcher sought to know the reaction oI the customers towards any price changes Many economists assume that customers or 'Price taker and accept price at 'Iace value or as given. Marketers recognize that customer oIten actively process price inIormation, interpreting prices in terms oI their knowledge Irom prior purchasing experience, Iormal communications (advertising, sales calls and brochures) inIormal communications Iriends, colleagues and Iamily members and point oI purchaser or online resourceThe Iindings were presented in table 4.11 Table 4.11 Customers reaction when prices of products change Reaction Frequency Percentages Complain 21 63 Take oII 10 28 No change 3 9 Total 34 100 The results showed 63 said the customer would complain, 28 said they will take oII while 9 said there will be no change. It is clear Irom the Iinding that complains always accompanying price changes, this because customers identiIy complaining as their solution to price changes. 4.3.6 How price affect overall sales It was paramount Ior the researcher to Iind out iI there was any relationship between price and sales. The Iindings were presented in table 4.12
Table 4.12 How price affect overall sales Response Frequency Percentages Yes 31 92 No 3 8 Total 34 100 The results showed 92 said price actually aIIect the overall sales while 8 said it doesn`t aIIect the sales. It is thereIore clear that price do aIIect sales that are high price mean low sales while low prices mean high sales. 4.3.7 Challenges faced by price variation on product branding The researchers sought establish the challenges Iaced by price variation on product branding since this will ultimately aIIect the overall perIormance oI the Iirm and more so its stability in the Iuture. The Iindings were presented in table 4.13 Table 4.13 Challenges faced by price variation on product branding Challenges Frequency Percentages Low sales turnover 2 8 Reduce inventory cost 4 12 High competition 10 28 Substitute product price 15 43 Government policies 3 9 Total 34 100 The results showed that 8 said low sales turnover, 12 said reduced inventory cost, 28 said high competition, 43 said substitute product price and 9 said government policies. It is evident that the Iirm should look Ior brand loyalty. Consumer can be categorized under Iour groups starting with brand switchers. To endure a price strategy, it is high, it gives the Iirm a greater degree oI advantage but not so when is low. Thus, customer`s characteristics play an important role in stocking price strategies. CHAPTER FIVE 5.0SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1. Introduction The Iindings presented in chapter Iour are Iurther summarized here so that speciIic Iindings can be obtained clearly in relation to the research objective. Then recommendations are made on what needs to be done to improve the use price variations on product branding 5.2 Summary of the findings 5.2.1 General information The study designed research objectives and research questions with the aim to solve the problem statement which was the theme oI the study. The study Iindings oI this research have thus been derived Irom these objectives and answers to research questions. The research questions that were to be answered by this study were:- a) What Iactors aIIect the use price variation on Iirm`s products? b) What criteria do the Iirm uses in determining prices oI its product? c) What is the relationship existing between price variation and product branding with regard to sales perIormance oI the Iirm? d) What are the challenges Iaced by price variation on product branding? 5.2.2 Gender of the respondents The results showed that 60 were male, and 40 were Iemale, this means those males are the majority oI the sampled respondents. The gender diIIerence in the organization was not high. This is Iacilitated by the work environment as most oI the job description in the organization needs active and productive workers. Both genders do play a vital role especially when it comes to the marketing and decision making in the organization. 5.2.3 Age of the respondent The Iindings showed that 17 oI respondents were between 20-30 years old, 48 between 30-40 years old, 22 between 40-50 years old and 13 50 and above years. This indicates that majority oI the respondents are above 25 years. This means they are at their prime age and so still have many expectations in liIe. It will be interesting to see how age Iactor has aIIected the objectives oI the research.
5.2.4 Marital status The table above indicates that the higher percentage oI staII is married hence indication oI positive signs oI social stability. 5.2.5 Academic qualification It was reported that 25 have certiIicate level oI education, 35 are diploma holders, 29 are degree holders, and 11 masters holders. Others still reported other qualiIications such as, A-level, CPA and proIessional proIiciency. The result shows that majority oI the employees are well educated. This implies that most oI the employees do understand the kind or type oI environment they are expected to work in and what is best Ior the organization as pertains the allocation oI prices oI its products. 5.2.6 Position of the respondent The results Irom the table shows that, 3 oI the respondents are manager, 3 are departmental managers, and 94 are employees. This indicated that general employees are the majority in the organization. The work environment oI each employee diIIers Irom one to another as their job description is diIIerent. In spite oI work environment being diIIerent all the employees would love to be given an opportunity to give their opinions as what they Ieel is beneIicial to the Iirm. 5.2.7 Working experience The results Irom the table indicated that none has worked Ior less than 1 year, 16 have worked Ior 1-5 years, 22 have worked Ior 2-5 years, 41 have worked Ior 5-8 years and 21 have worked Ior over 8 years. The highest numbers oI respondents have a good working experience as they have worked with the organization Ior more than 2 years which shows that they are aware with the organization requirement and the expectations required too. 5.3 Specific objective Question 1 what factors affect the use price variation on firm`s products?
The results showed that 42 said competitors Irom similar products, 33 said Iashion, taste and preIerences while 20 said perception oI the customers and 3 said cost and experience. Question 2 what criteria do the firm uses in determining prices of its product? The results showed that 10 said cost-plus pricing, 42 said Break-even analysis and Target proIit pricing while 6 said quality oI the product, Irom the Iindings it`s clear that the Iirm set prices to break even on the cost oI making and marketing a product or setting prices to make a target proIit. Question 3 what is the relationship existing between price variation and product branding with regard to sales performance of the firm? The results showed that 32 said maximization oI proIit margin, 54 said high cost oI production, 10 said Survival oI the Iirm in a competitive Iield and 4 said status quo oI the Iirm. It is thereIore clear that cost oI production sets the Iloor Ior the price that the organization can charge Ior its products. . Companies with lower costs can set lower prices that result in greater sales and proIits. 5.4 Conclusion From the Iindings it showed the gender diIIerence in the organization was not high. This is Iacilitated by the work environment as most oI the job description in the organization needs active and productive workers. The results showed that majority oI the respondents are above 25 years. The results indicated that general employees are the majority in the organization. However In spite oI work environment being diIIerent all the employees would love to be given an opportunity to give their opinions as what they Ieel is beneIicial to the Iirm. From the Iindings it showed the highest numbers oI respondents have a good working experience as they have worked with the organization Ior more than 2 years which shows that they are aware with the organization requirement and the expectations required too. From the Iindings it is evident that Marketers are aware oI dissimilar goods and service and that customer might choose over their goods and services. 5.5 Recommendation
Based on the Iindings and conclusions oI the study the researcher Ielt that the Iollowing recommendations are necessary to improve the use oI price variations on product branding. The recommendations were; a) The company to continuously improve their product branding Ior Iair prices as the end results b) The company to continuously develop new channels oI distributions while trying to maintain the existing one towards customers satisIaction c) Prices should not be changed regularly as this will aIIect consumption oI products d) The management should always communicate price changes to avoid customer Irustration associated with price adjustment. e) Cost oI production should be maintained low so as not to aIIect Iinal price oI the product I) Prices should be associated with branding quality oI the product because customers believe that the higher the price the quality oI the product. REFERENCES Berkowiz (2003). Management foundation and practices. U.S.A: Prentice Hall publishers.Cooper . (1971). Principles of Marketing management. New jersey: McGraw hill publishers. Forbers. W (1996). Distribution channels management. New york: McGraw Hill publishers. eegan J. (2003). Principle of marketing management, 11th Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.