MERSCorp' New Contract with "Genpact and Corporate Malfeasance December, 2010 by johngault MERSCorp, which is the parent

of MERS Inc., has entered into a 7 year contract with a company called "Genpact". MERS has engaged in the largest case of corporate malfeasance in history. Here is the link for the announcement made at Genpact: http://www.genpact.com/home/aboutgenpact/press-releases/ genpact-MERS-contract.aspx According to Dave Krieger, author of "Clouded Titles", Genpact is headquarted in the Bahamas and apparently operates in India. Yes, India. In addition to the most egregious insult to most egregious injury, some fear this is an effort at spoilation. It will also likely serve to add yet another layer and another party to legally 'haggle' with, in efforts to get at the truth of MERS' 'records'. What is going on here? This private 'record-keeping' wasn't and isn't brutal enough? Now it's leaving our shores? As Patrick Henry said, "Forbid it, Almighty God!" As the illusion of MERS has unravelled - to our horror - (see my first article here), it has become clear that it is only members of MERS who actually enter any information including transfers of notes into its database. This has been done on a strictly voluntary basis with absolutely no oversight by MERS, which has and never has had employees. Nor is oversight possible in a clandestine, voluntary only system, especially one with no corporate governance of its own and no oversight or governance of actions taken by alleged principals in the name of the alleged agent (tweaked, very tweaked). I mean, if I'm supposed to give you all my eggs, and only give you three when I have five, how would you know based on this mullarkey? What has also become clear is that MERS has operated without one scintilla of corporate governance, from non-existant resolutions to the following list of malfeasance, misfeasance, nonfeasance, or d) all the above. MERS does not have nor has it ever had any copies of notes or deeds or trust or mortgages. It has no copies of collateral instruments for which, through its members, it has claimed either nominee, agent, or beneficiary status. MERS does not participate in any litigation in which it is a party. Counsel allegedly representing MERS is retained and paid by members, members who are also represented by that same counsel and more often than not, in the same litigation. This is a prima facie, unprecedented instance of conflict of interest, and is purposefully misleading to all involved, including the judiciary. "MERS" litigation arguments are being made by the members in defense of the actions taken by those members in the name of MERS. MERS has no corporate central archive for, nor has it ever had, copies of litigation undertaken by its members in its name. MERS may or may not have even been notified of litigation undertaken and paid for by its members in its name.

MERS has never provided a copy of any document or instrument attached to any motion or pleading in any litigation or foreclosure action taken by its members in its name. Someone else did, in MERS' name. MERS did not file foreclosure actions. These actions were taken by other parties in MERS' name, and yet other participants in the foreclosure process were hired and paid by members, not MERS. Documents signed in MERS' name were not based on MERS' books of accounts, files, records, or documents within MERS' corporate supervision, custody, or control. No employee or real corporate officer of MERS ever executed an assignment of anything. Members did, with no corporate oversight or supervision by MERS. MERS does not have a central corporate archive nor has it ever had copies of these alleged assignments executed in MERS' name by member' employees or foreclosure mills. Unless an affidavit or declaration was signed by one of MERS' four true corporate officers, that affidavit or declaration was actually signed by a member's employee, and apparently, even by non-member employees. MERS does not have a central archive nor has it ever had copies of these affidavits and declarations. These affidavits and declarations were never made with any MERS' corporate oversight or supervision nor based on MERS' corporate records, documents, or accounts. MERS does not maintain a central corporate archive for notices, demands, or correspondence related to foreclosure done by its members in its name nor were any of these ever constructed or executed with MERS' corporate oversight or supervision. MERS does not maintain a corporate archive of Mr. Hultman's alleged appointments of (straw) certifying officers. The current iteration (3rd) of MERS, Inc. on information and belief has no corporate resolution authorizing these appointments (see BONY v Upke, NJ 09-01710, deposition of William Hultman - posted at scribd). An audit of MERS' database, long overdue, would likely reveal more transfers of servicing rights than transfers of notes. Transfers of notes to 'securitized trusts' are not to be found. The trail, if at all straight and narrow, ends prematurely. * Not pretty. And there, in this pretense of legitimacy, are the only 'records' of collateral interests and titles to our land ownership. (This is so appalling, it's truy hard to grasp. It's hard to handle that it could and did happen here in the U S of A) This is NOT a reason for the government of we the people to turn a blind eye, along the lines of too big to fail. We cannot and will not be held hostage by this gang. MERS' entire 'records' need to be made public and let the chips fall where they will. MERSCorp's own actions and inactions have provided a big enough stick. I have an idea. MERSCorp can hire thousands and thousands of AMERICAN workers, tax-paying employees, to begin the (seemingly impossible) task of 'correcting' this atrocity. County recorders can hire thousands, as well. It may well be impossible, and will be small comfort to those who have already lost their homes to the boogie man, but hiring out of work American employees is a better move than out-sourcing-out-ofthis-country. Of course, we don't know what they're really up to with this out-sourcing, do we? I literally shudder to think. If MERS is not up to no good with this move, (dubious, dubious, dubious) they

can honor their new contract AND hire Americans. They've got the dough. Or better yet, their database should be seized and then thousands and thousands may be hired to start the process of putting our land records back where they belong - with COUNTY Recorder's. *author's note: in June of 2010, MERS directed its members to go from showing only the servicer (!) in its computer system to showing the (alleged) noteowner(!)