You are on page 1of 7

Revealing the Truth about the Democratic Party...

Share Away
by Frantz Emmanuel Kebreau on Wednesday, September 14, 2011 at 10:23am (From facebook)

(Video Version: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UObEdF_uhaw ) I have done extensive research on the subject because at one point, I was a Democrat. A few years ago, I was confronted with a fact that I knew to be false but after an investigation into the point, it turned out to be true. It was that Martin Luther King was a Republican. This of course forced me to extend my research into other areas. What else could this Political Science Major be unaware of? The Truth became stranger than fiction. The list is quite long so here we go.

President Kennedy had little intention of enacting a Comprehensive Civil Rights Law during his 2 years in office. Tensions in society were running so high due to the riots and such that by the 1963 State of the Union address he had no other choice but to enact some kind of Law. Mind you, for the previous 100 years, it had only been the Republican Party who had supported any Civil Rights Legislations (I was not aware of these facts until I was 35 years old); 13th Amendment: 100% Republican Support 23% Democratic Support Abolished Slavery

14th Amendment

94% Republican Support 0% Democratic Support

Slaves to be Citizens

15th Amendment

100% Republican Support 0% Democratic Support

Right to Vote for All

CRA 1866 CRA 1871 CRA 1875

Enacted by the Republican Party Enacted by the Republican Party 99% Republican Support 0% Democratic Support

Equal Rights Anti-KKK Anti-Discrimination

-----------It took another 82 years until the next Civil Rights Act-------------------The Democratic Party blocked every attempt to equalize citizens of color----CRA 1957 Enacted by the Eisenhower (R) Administration Then Senator Kennedy Voted against this Bill Filibustered by Democrats CRA 1960 Enacted by the Eisenhower (R) Administration The final version was watered down by then Senator LBJ Filibustered by the Democrats

CRA 1964

82% Republican Support 63% Democratic Support

CRA 1965 Voting Rights

87% Republican Support 75% Democratic Support

I do not want the government to treat me any differently than any other citizen. Therefore, I consider equality of opportunity and equal voting rights to be the summation of Civil Rights in America. If anything extra is afforded me or anyone else merely due to the color of their skin, I consider that to be an entitlement and patronizing. Given my above statement, the Democratic Party, even if you sectionalize them by North and South, has never outvoted the Republican Party in any Civil Rights LawEver. The actual numbers play out like this; Lifetime Republican Party support for Equal Rights for all Citizens: Lifetime Democratic Party Support for Equal rights for all Citizens: 94% 35%

Now to the point of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This was a proposal that the Republican Party, during the Eisenhower Administration attempted to put forth but alas, their efforts resulted in the first Civil Rights Law in the previous 82 yearsThe Civil Rights Act of 1957 formed a Commission on Civil Rights. The Plan of the Commission was to eventually enact the very Comprehensive Law of 1964. Remember, this was the Bill that Senator JFK voted against, for political aspirations Im sure. JFK had his Justice department write the original Bill in early 1963. The first version passed the House but stalled in the Senate. Everett McKinley Dirksen (R), the minority leader in the Senate took it upon himself to REWRITE the entire Bill. It took him 1 weekend and he had 2 helpers, 1 Democrat and another Republican. The final version of the 1964 Civil Rights Act was written by a Republican which means that since the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, every Civil Rights Law was written by a Republican with more Republican support than Democratic Party Support. Due to Dirksens tenacity, a cloture vote was successful and the Senate passed the Bill. It then passed the Houses and became Law. Some notes about its passage; Robert Byrd (D) filibustered the Billthe longest filibuster in American History

William Fulbright (D) voted against the Bill. He was Bill Clintons mentor. Al Gore Sr. (D) voted against the Bill Speaking to two Governors on Air Force One, then President LB Johnson was quoted saying, "I'll have those n*ggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years." according Ronald Kessler's Book in relation to the Law. So now lets explore the Dixicrats. This has always been misrepresented. I wrote about it in my book, and I also made a video of it. Here is the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdJsPsU55PM The big question is, did the South really turn Red after the CRA of 1964? Well, I researched that also and found the following conclusions. Presidential Elections (covering The Solid South) The 11 Former Confederate States Year Blue States Red States

1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008

6 6 (Segregationist Wallace took 5) Landslide Landslide Landslide Landslide Landslide 4 4 0 0 3

5 5

7 7 11 11 8

At least in Presidential elections, the Solid South wasnt so solid until at least the year 2000 or 36 years after the CRA of 1964. Now lets take a look at the Governorships. Governorships since 1964 (The 11 former Confederate States) State elected Georgia Mississippi Alabama Louisiana Texas South Carolina Arkansas North Carolina Tennessee Virginia Florida Blue 7 8 9 6 5 5 9 7 5 7 7 Red 2 2 3 4 4 5 3 2 4 5 5 Years until a Red Gov. was 39 years 28 years 23 years 16 years 15 years 11 years 9 years 9 years 7 years 6 years 3 years

Total

75

39

Thats almost 2 to 1 Blue over Red. I looked at the facts and not the rhetoric. The facts point to a different conclusion all together. The South did not become Solid Red after the CRA of 1964. After finding out that both Martin Luther King Sr. and Jr. were Republicans, I tend to deal only in facts and not with what Ive been told. Last Points:

My former party, The Democratic Party says that they are for the minority. In this case, Ill just say blacks. I believe in neither black nor minority but I defer to their thinking for this discussion. If thats the case, then how could the following piece of history have been erased? Ninety-nine percent of the country does not know the name Hiram Rhodes Revels. Here is his story and why the Democrats are not for black people. At the end of the Civil War, Jefferson Davis, the President of the Confederacy, was captured and subsequently imprisoned for 2 years. Prior to this time period, Mr. Davis was a Senator from the State of Mississippi. In 1870, the State of Mississippi filled the vacant post of Mr. Davis with one Hiram Rhodes Revels. The curious fact behind this exchange is that now Senator Hiram Rhodes Revels did not only replace the President of the Confederacy, but he was also the First Black Senator in U.S. Historyand virtually nobody knows his name. One last point to explain this lack of universal knowledgeJefferson Davis, The President of the Confederacy was a Democrat and his replacement, Senator Hiram Rhodes Revels, was a Republican. Democratic leadership today will never share that history with their constituents of which I once was. That led me to believe that the Democratic Party is more interested in my vote than the Truth. It gets bit deeper. 13 former slaves became members of Congress between 1870 and 1901. We as a nation killed our own citizens in a Civil War to FREE 4 Million slaves. 13 of those freed slaves became members of the U.S. Congress and the history books are silent to this fact. 640,000 Americans died in that war and the result was transformational yet, this groundbreaking and profound history is never taught in left leaning schools because it does not serve their agenda. All 13 of the former slaves were Republicans. I had to sift through the Library of Congress to reveal the following informationhere it is for you in a video; 13 Slaves http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5O2IVfz8a0 My belief is that the Partys did not change. The tactics changed. They went from ProSlavery to Pro-Segregation to Pro-Entitlement, all of which results in nothing beneficial for the prosperity of an individual and is considered by many of my ilk, Plantation Politics. All I want is the Truth and to be treated as an equal, no more and no less; as an equal. I do not need the Democratic Party telling me that Im black or that Im a minority who needs their assistance. I am not a color. I am Frantz Kebreau, an American Citizen. For the Democratic Party, it has always been about Control over Freedom. Keeping the Truth from its constituents in order to maintain control over them is not what I want from my Party

Revealing the Truth About the Democratic Party...On Video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UObEdF_uhaw

Frantz Kebreau CEO, Stolen History Author of Stolen History www.Frantzkebreau.com If you would like more information, please take a look at the Stolen History Book and Audio versions at the link below. http://frantzkebreau.mybigcommerce.com/index.php The Truth Shall Set You Free!!