Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page
I of3
From: Sent:
To: Gc:
Ilgpday,
Sublect:
RE: Wkileaks.org
Glasslffcation: classification:
Roger....
s@RN/20x1
--
il25x1 20330522
SEC
tDSXt 20330522
Frcm
'l25Kt 20330522
classification:
SEC
5Xt
Z0330SZ}
mIThisofficedoesnotdealwithrears[sresponsibleforanyinvestigationsintosuchissues
Ftom; Sent: To:
su
classification:
Cc:
lasxt
2o33os21
SEcne
5xI
2033052I
@//ilW)
I looked atthe site this morning.E saw, but I'm nqt a security/classification reviffi
61712010
I
Page 2 of 3
6ffiaUo,rt-this "Wikileaks" site and others like "Cryptome.org" - information posted has often times actually beel through a review and is no longer classifiLi. Someine then produc.r th" cover letter that states such, the declassiffing authority/agency, and the applicable date. Once that cover letter is rernoved, it appears as though ttre original document is stiil classified, as there war no level of effort applied to strike thnr the helrders/footers in a lO0-plus-pase docume"t.
(UltrOtJfO) I'm honestly strprised information and the site posting thtPDre
e "Wikileaks" site
Ylr,
To:
$tl
classifi cation : CONFIDENT
llzsxl
This was posted in this momings NRO Watch Log. Would you do e quick scan of VYikileaks to if there ic any NRo-retefglfdormation thet might be out there that shouldn't be" Let me know if you dig up anything.
see
61712010
7
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 26 OCT 2011
Page 3
of3
Warning: This document may not be used as a source of derivative classification. DECL oN: 25xl 20580s2t RRG dated July 2005 Derived&om: NCG 6.0,21 May ZOO1 CONFIDEN oRll//25x1 20580521 RRG dated Juty 2005
DECL ON:20330521 Derived From: NCG 6.0,2! May 2005 RNr/25X1 2033As21
Warning: This document may not be used as a source of derivative classification. DECL ON:20330522 Dqlygg From: NCG 6.0, 21 May 2005 s ECRETTNOFORN4Z sxt 20330522
Waming: This document may not be used DECL ON:20330522 From: NCG 6.A,21 May 2005 "ri*d SEC 5Xl 20330s22
as a source
of derivative classification.
617t2010