Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(c) Buying a put (d) Buying two calls (e) Buying asset.
5. If stock is purchased at Rs.50 and a Rs.55 call is written for a premium of Rs.2, the maximum < Answer >
possible gain per share is
(a) Rs.2 (b) Rs.5 (c) Rs.7 (d) Rs.8 (e) Rs.10.
6. If somebody buys a soybean futures and sells a soybean meal futures, this is < Answer >
(a) 5.24% (b) 5.27% (c) 5.50% (d) 5.73% (e) 5.76%.
10. The daily limit of a commodity futures contract is the maximum < Answer >
(a) Amount by which the maintenance margin can change per day
(b) Percentage by which the futures price can increase from the previous day
(c) Price increase or decrease relative to the settlement price the previous day
I. The intrinsic value is obtained by subtracting the per-share exercise price of an option
from the market price of a stock.
II. The intrinsic value is obtained by subtracting the market price of a stock from the per-
share exercise price of an option.
III. The intrinsic value is the maximum price that an option will command when a stock’s
market price is below the exercise price.
IV. The market price of an option will approach its intrinsic value at expiration.
(a) Both (I) and (III) only (b) Both (I) and (IV) only
(c) Both (II) and (III) only (d) Both (II) and (IV) only
(a) Selling put with higher strike price and buying put with lower strike price
(b) Buying and selling put of near and long term respectively
(c) Writing a call and buying a call with different strike prices but identical maturity
(e) Writing a call option and buying a put option of identical strike price.
16. Which of the following positions has the same exposure to interest rates as the receiver of the < Answer >
floating rate on a standard interest rate swap?
(e) At-the-money-options.
19. Which VaR methodology is least effective for measuring option risk? < Answer >
(a) Positive gamma, positive theta (b) Positive delta, positive rho
(c) Positive theta, negative vega (d) Positive delta, negative gamma
(a) Only (I) above (b) Only (II) above (c) Only (III) above
(d) Both (I) and (II) above (e) Both (II) and (III) above.
24. If two options are bought at two extreme prices, and two options are sold at two intermediate < Answer >
prices, it is known as
(a) If the principal amount and the notional amount of the swap match
(b) If the fair value of the swap is zero in the beginning of the transaction
(c) If the net settlements under the swap are computed on each settlement date in the
same way as they are calculated on an interest-bearing instrument
(e) If there is no cap or floor on the variable interest rate of the swap.
26. VaR measures should be supplemented by portfolio stress-testing because < Answer >
(a) VaR measures does not indicate how large the losses can be
(a) 3.72% (b) 3.80% (c) 3.84% (d) 3.96% (e) 4.02%.
30. Which of the following losses is excluded from fire insurance policy? < Answer >
1. In January 2005, the T-bill futures on the IMM are trading at the following prices:
A speculator is expecting that the yield curve is about to become steeper. The speculator has no
particular views about the level of interest rates, however, he wishes to profit from this view.
You are required to show how the speculator can profit from this view? Under what circumstances
will he make loss?
2. The stock of a company is currently quoted in the market at Rs.150. The price of the stock is
expected to go up or down by 10% in next one year and by 15% in the second year. The risk-free interest
rate in the economy is 6%.
Required:
Using two-step Binomial Model, find out the price of a 2-year American put option on the company’s
stock with strike price of Rs.175.
3. A firm in Denmark exports dairy products. On June 15 2004, an order worth $ 5 million to a US super
store chain was shipped. The payment was due after 3 months from the day of shipment. The spot DKr/$
was 6.1569 and the 3 month forward rate was 6.1625 at that time. The firm considered hedging the exposure
through futures contract. Since futures contract for Danish Kroner was not available, it considered either
futures on Swiss Franc or Swedish Kroner on IMM as both the currencies are closely related to Danish
Kroner.
The spot SFr/$ rate was 1.2743 and September SFr futures were trading at $0.7875. The spot SKr/$
rate was 7.5833 and September SKr futures were trading at $0.13126 at that time.
On September 15, 2004, dollar was priced in the spot market as at SFr 1.2678, SKr 7.6166 and DKr
6.1602. In the futures market September SFr future was priced $ 0.7891 and September SKr futures was
priced at $ 0.13133.
You are required to find out which hedging strategy would have been better for the Danish firm.
(Standard size of SFr and SKr futures are 125,000 each).
4. The current ¥/$ spot rate is 112.00. A speculator believes that in the next three months yen will
fluctuate significantly against dollar, but he is not sure of the direction of the movement. The following 3-
month European put options on yen are traded in the market:
5. A corporation enters into a $10 million notional principal interest rate swap. The swap calls for a
corporation to pay fixed rate and receive floating rate on LIBOR. The payment will be made every 90 days for
one year and will be based on the adjustment factor 90/360. The term structure of LIBOR when the swap is
initiated is as follows:
6. The following table lists the deltas, gammas and vegas for long position on three derivative
instruments for a notional principal of $1 million for each.
Instrument (underlying 90-day LIBOR) Delta Gamma Vega
3-year call option with exercise rate of 4% $40 $1,343 $5.02
3-year swap with fixed rate of 3.25% $152 -$678 $0
2-year FRA with fixed rate of 3% $72 -$360 $0 Long
position on a swap or FRA means to pay fixed rate and to receive floating rate.
An investor is holding $12 million notional principal long position in the 3-year call option, an $8
million notional principal short position in the 3-year swap and an $11 million notional principal long position
in the FRA.
a. Determine the current portfolio delta, gamma and vega. Explain the risk properties of the
portfolio.
b. Assume that the investor has to maintain the current position in the call option but is free to
change his positions in the swap and FRA. The investor has also identified a 1-year call option with
delta of $62, gamma of $2,680 and vega of $2.41 to combine in his portfolio. Find the overall
position of notional principals that would make the overall position be delta, gamma and vega-
hedged.
END OF SECTION B
7. a. What will happen in the options market if the price of an American call is less than the
value Max (0, S – E)? Will your answer differ if the options are European? Explain.
b. Call prices are directly related to the stock’s volatility, yet higher volatility means stock
prices can go lower. How will you resolve this apparent paradox?
8. ‘The list of pure risks suffices to say that doing anything in life involves risk’. Explain the various
types of pure risks.
Suggested Answers
Financial Risk Management – I (231) : April 2005
Section A : Basic Concepts
1. The principal amount and the notional amount of the swap match.
5. The terms are typical for both the instruments and they should not
invalidate the assumption.
6. The maturity date of the instrument and the expiration date of the
swap match.
The time period between re-pricing is frequent enough to assume that the
variable rate is a market rate.
26 Answer : (a) <
TO
. P>
Reason :The goal of stress testing is to identify losses that can go beyond the
normal losses measured by VaR.
27 Answer : (b) <
TO
. P>
Reason : Non-leveraged inflation indexed payments are not accounted
separately under FASB - 133.
28 Answer : (e) <
TO
. P>
Reason : HDD = 0 or, whichever is higher
= 10.
29 Answer : (c) <
TO
. P>
Yield = = 3.84%.
30 Answer : (e) <
TO
. P>
Reason : Loss by theft during the fire is not included in the fire insurance
policy.
Section B : Problems
March 98.25
June 97.95
If the dealer expects that the yield curve will become steeper it means that spread between the near and far
end contract will widen, i.e. Longer term interest rates will rise more than the shorter term interest rates.
Hence the speculator will buy a near end contract and sell a far end contract i.e. buying a spread. He buys
March contract and sells June contract. Assume in February the new rates are as under:
Scenario I II
March 98.35 98.10
June 98.00 97.75 If the speculator closes his
position
-------
-------
-------
-------
The speculator gains from his expectations that the yield curve becomes steeper under both the scenarios of
increasing interest rates and decreasing interest rates.
The speculator can make loss with this strategy if yield curve become downward sloping i.e. if the fall in long
term interest rate is more than the fall in short term interest rate.
< TOP >
Risk-free rate = 6%
The value of American put option at node D, E, F and G will be equal to the value of European
put option on these nodes.
= = 9.83
At node B, pay-off from early exercise is Rs.10, which is more than the value calculated as per single-
period model. So value of put at node B is 10.
P = = 30.09.
Pay-off from early exercise is 40, whereas single-period model gives a value of 30.09 which is lower, so
value of put will be 40.
P = = 15.09.
Whereas the value due to early exercise is Rs.25 which is more than the value given by single period
model.
As the customer had a receivable in $, he would go long in SFr futures as it amounts to go short in USD
i.e. buy SFr futures
Standard size of SFr future is 125,000.
Here also as the customer had a receivable in $, he would bought SKr futures.
Standard size of SKr future is 125,000.
Appropriate strategy is short butterfly spread. Here, the investor should sell puts at 0.0085 and 0.0093 and
buy 2 puts at 0.0089.
5. a. Let the fixed rate to be received by the bank be ‘R’, and the notional principal be ‘P’.
The present value of the fixed leg we can get by multiplying (P ´ R) by the discounting factor we
can get from the LIBOR term structure.
We know that on the date when interest rate is reset, the bond sells at par value. Hence, at
time 0, the present value of floating rate payments is the notional principal, P. But, given that there
is no principal payment the present value of principal repayment to be subtracted.
Now value of the swap at inception should be zero, hence we will equate present value of fixed
payments and present value of floating payments.
b. The first net payment is based on a fixed rate of 7.34 percent and a floating rate of 7 percent:
The net is that the party paying fixed makes a payment of $8,500.
Thus, for each basis point increase in the 90-day LIBOR, the portfolio will increase in value by $56
and the delta will increase by 17,580. For each unit increase in the volatility, the portfolio will
increase in value by $60.24.
b. We have to set up the following three equations to make the portfolio delta-, gamma- and vega-
hedged using the new 1-year call option:
The first equation contains the deltas of the combination of $12 million in the 3-year call option, x1
million in the 3-year swap, x2 million in the 2-year FRA and x3 million in the 1-year call, which are
combined to equal zero so that the position is delta-hedged. The second equation does the same
with the gammas. The third equation does the same with the vegas.
82 x1 = 56,234
or, x1 = 685.78
By solving the equations we get the solutions as x1 = – 685.78, x2 = – 1432.90 and x3 = – 25.00.
Thus, a short position in $685.78 million of the 3-year swap, a short position in $1432.90 million of
the 2-year FRA and a short position in $25 million of the 1-year call option will combine with the $12
million long position in the 3-year call to set the delta, gamma and vega to zero.
If the call were European, however, immediate exercise would not be possible
(unless, of course, it was the expiration day), so the European call could technically sell for
less than the intrinsic value of the American call. We saw, though, that the European call
has a lower bound of the stock price minus the present value of the exercise price
(assuming no dividends). Since this is greater than the intrinsic value, the European call
would sell for more than the intrinsic value. Then at expiration, it would sell for the
intrinsic value.
b. The paradox is resolved by recalling that if the option expires out-of-the-money, it does not
matter how far out-of-the-money it is. The loss to the option holder is limited to the
premium paid. For example, suppose the stock price is Rs.24, the exercise price is Rs.20,
and the call price is Rs.6. Higher volatility increases the chance of greater gains to the
holder of the call. It also increases the chance of a larger stock price decrease. If, however,
the stock price does end up below Rs.20, the investor's loss is the same regardless of
whether the stock price at expiration is Rs.19 or Rs.1. If the stock were purchased instead
of the call, the loss would obviously be greater if the stock price went to Rs.1 than if it
went to Rs.19. For this reason, holders of stocks dislike volatility, while holders of calls
like volatility. A similar argument applies to puts.
i. Property Exposure
Property Exposure
Any business or individual that uses any kind of property whether owned, leased, rented or other wise is
exposed to the risk of loss, theft and damage that may be caused by man-made reasons or natural reasons.
Depending on the extent of exposure and damage, the business may be affected.
Liability Exposure
Around the world, liability to any business due to litigation, damages, claims, etc. has become a major issue
of concern. Millions of dollars are lost by companies over legal suits and settlements. Such risks are there to
an individual also.
Human beings have a certain death, although the extent of life quality cannot be determined. An individual
may die while still young or may be bed-ridden for most of his life. Some people are healthy while others
have to spend a major part of their earnings on health related matters. This exposure leads to loss of
earnings for the individual, as well as loss of man-hours to the business to which he is associated.
Financial Exposure
The three exposures mentioned above involve pure risks. Financial exposure can be because of
speculative nature also, and should not always be considered as a pure risk, but it still has same
problems associated with pure risks. Although the techniques associated with these risks may
be different from those uses to manage the other risks mentioned above, it remains critical that
these risks be identified as assessed in order for the firm to achieve its business goals.
< TOP >