Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jerry M. Mendel
University of Southern California
1. Introduction a long time, and yet not much has been dle it. One of the best sources for general
done about it. It has been largely ignored. discussions about uncertainty is Klir and
Fuzzy sets have been around for nearly Wierman (1998). Regarding the nature of
40 years and have found many applica- Zadeh (1975) already recognized there uncertainty, they state (1998, p. 43): "Three
tions. However as I will explain they suffer was a problem with a type-1 FS, when he types of uncertainty are now recognized...
from certain problems. These fuzzy sets introduced a type-2 (and even higher- fuzziness (or vagueness), which results
are, in fact, type-1 fuzzy sets. Type-2 fuzzy types) FS. This occurred almost 10 years from the imprecise boundaries of FSs; non-
sets are 'fuzzy fuzzy' sets and are more after the publication of his first seminal specificity (or information-based impreci-
expressive as we shall see in this article. paper. One could ask: "Why did it take so sion), which is connected with sizes (cardi-
long for this to happen?" and "Why didn't a nalities) of relevant sets of alternatives; and
Recently (Mendel, 2003), I demonstrat- type-2 FS immediately become popular?" strife (or discord), which expresses con-
ed [using Popper's (1954) Falsificationism] Eventually I will answer these questions, flicts among the various sets of alterna-
that to use a type-1 fuzzy set (FS) to model but first there are more fundamental ques- tives." Observe that these three kinds of
a word is scientifically incorrect, because a tions that I will pose and answer about uncertainties all involve something about
word is uncertain whereas a type-1 FS is uncertainty and a type-2 FS, since most of sets, and, as we know a FS is character-
certain. This may come as a shock to many the readers of this Newsletter will be unfa- ized by its MF. So, I will interpret any and all
people, because a FS has been proposed miliar with such a set. kinds of uncertainties as being transferred
as a model for a word from the very begin- to the MF of the FS. If a FS is used to
ning of fuzzy sets, e.g., Zadeh's (1965) first model a word, then these kinds of uncer-
example uses a FS to model a word. Just 2. Some Questions and Answers
tainties could be called linguistic uncertain-
about every textbook does the same. And 1) Can you be more specific about the ties. A FS may also be used to model ran-
this is also true about computing with "paradox" of a type-1 FS? dom or time-varying signals.
words (e.g., Zadeh (1996)). I am not sure who first referred to
"fuzzy" being paradoxical, meaning that the I shall distinguish between two high-level
Fortunately, most applications of type-1 word fuzzy has the connotation of uncer- kinds of uncertainties, random and linguis-
FSs only use the mathematics of such sets tainty, and yet the MF of a FS is complete- tic. Probability theory is associated with the
and do not focus on them as actual models ly certain once its parameters are specified. former, and, as we now know FSs can be
for words, e.g. rule-based fuzzy systems, in The following quote from Klir and Folger associated with the latter. If FSs are used in
which antecedents and consequents are (1988) uses the word paradoxical: "The applications in which randomness is pres-
words, are often used only in the context of accuracy of any MF is necessarily limited. ent (as can occur, e.g. in statistical signal
some sort of universal function approxima- In addition, it may seem problematical, if processing or digital communications) then
tion which is mathematics and not linguis- not paradoxical, that a representation of both kinds of uncertainties should be
tics. fuzziness is made using membership accounted for. This does not necessarily
grades that are themselves precise real mean that random uncertainties have to be
There are also applications of type-1 numbers. Although this does not pose a modeled probabilistically. Bounded uncer-
FSs in which a fuzzy system is used to serious problem for many applications, it is tainties can be modeled deterministically
approximate random data, or to model an nevertheless possible to extend the con- and this can be done within the framework
environment that is changing in an cept of a FS to allow for the distinction of a FS. It is also possible to combine fuzzy
unknown way with time. Even though uni- between grades of membership to become sets and probability (e.g., Buckley, 2003),
versal approximation may also be the blurred." but this article is not about doing this. My
underlying basis for these applications, a arguments below about using type-2 fuzzy
type-1 FS has limited capabilities to direct- 2) There are different kinds of uncertain- sets should apply there as well.
ly handle such uncertainties, where by han- ty, so which one(s) are you referring to,
dle I mean to model and minimize the effect and where does randomness fit into all 3) What exactly does "both kinds of
of. That a type-1 FS cannot do this sounds of this? uncertainties should be accounted for"
paradoxical because the word fuzzy has Indeed, uncertainty comes in many guis- mean?
the connotation of uncertainty. This para- es and is independent of what kind of FS or Within probability theory we begin with a
dox about a type-1 FS has been known for any kind of methodology one uses to han- probability density function (pdf) that
Jerry M. Mendel is Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Southern California in Los
Angeles, USA. He has published over 430 technical papers and is author and/or editor of eight books.
His present research interests include: type-2 fuzzy logic systems and their applications to a wide range
of problems, including target classification and computing with words, and, spatio-temporal fusion of
decisions. He is a Fellow of the IEEE and a Distinguished Member of the IEEE Control Systems Society.
He was President of the IEEE Control Systems Society in 1986, and is presently Chairman of the Fuzzy
Technical Committee of the IEEE Neural Networks Society. Among his awards are the 1983 Best
Transactions Paper Award of the IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society, the 1992 Signal
Processing Society Paper Award, the 2002 Transactions on Fuzzy Systems Outstanding Paper Award,
a 1984 IEEE Centennial Medal, and an IEEE Third Millenium Medal.
The editorial board at the IEEE coNNectionS would like to acknowledge the contribution of Andres Perez-Uribe on his
graphic art appeared in the cover page of May 2003 issue (a single neuron driving a mobile robot). Additionally, sincere grat-
itude goes to Thomas Bräunl for his illustration appeared in page 9 of the feature article in the last issue and titled "eyebot
robot."