Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The first and most important topic is the sealing (figure 1) basically a system which is there since decades O-ring based. If we think on basic mechanical engineering knowledge, an O-ring is a static sealing and not a dynamic sealing and here we are. Most of the brands in the market are using O-ring as direct sealing on the pistons which causes major problems like: high friction, high break away torque and high wear and tear. High friction because regularly these O-rings need a
pre tension to guarantee a proper and tight sealing between the pressure chambers which results in torque losses around 20% and herein as well non smooth operation. In the pneumatic technology it is the so called slip-stick effect. The result is a step wise movement and a problematic control operation which makes positioning with a controller / 3P-positioner difficult and nearly impossible. So lets think about a better solution! In the factory automation it is state-ofthe-art to use pressure dependant sealing = dynamic sealing, which means usually a lip-sealing who aligns and gives tightness under pressure. If the actuator is without air-pressure there is no sealing and following no friction as there is no pre-tension of the sealing. With rising pressure the lip of the sealing is pressed to the housing and gives appropriate sealing. Additionally such a sealing guarantee a proper tightness even if the geometry of the housing is not 100% round shaped. Consider a bigger pneumatic actuator around 6000Nm output torque and a Butterfly Valve with a rubber liner in
September 2008 1
www.valve-world.net
Figure 2
Now the use of oil-free compressed air is possible. This leads directly to better types of compressors and maintenance free air distribution = reduced TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) respective reduced Lifecycle costs of the system. No more contamination of the environment (think of food stuff production & Water Treatment Plants). The second important subject is now the situation that some Process Valves need a left-to-close action whereas others need right-to-close action (figure 2)! In the past the solution was as follows. Rack-andPinion actuator was produced (or on stock) as right-to-close version, to change the function the actuator has to be disassembled, the pistons turned by 180 degrees a reassembled again. For Scotch-Yoke actuators this is not possible a second version has to be produced. The result was extended stock-holding, double part numbers and so on. As a solution the
actuator shall be produced with reversed interfaces on top and bottom, enables a visa-versa installation on the process valve, either right-toclose or left-to-close whatever the process valve requires. Some people may investigate and ask in regard to the NAMUR standard that there is a stub shaft required according to VDI/VDE 3845? No worries, as the actuator then has a both side identical shaft connection, as simple insert with a fixing will do the same job. The third thing is that especially in the chemical industry a so called pressure release slot (slot between the Valve flange and the actuator)on the valve actuator interface (ISO 5211) is required so that a shaft sealing leakage of the process valve is discovered directly on the spot. If not, during disassembly of the actuator the staff can be injured by the in-line media and / or the media can go directly in the actuator and herewith inside the air distribution system causing extensive damages. If this slot is now inside the actuator profile on both sides the end user has no more to take care of the right valve any valve will do, just have a look on the actuator. This reduces the stock holding massive and as well extends the possible valve selection as any valve which is resistant to the media can be installed without modification.
www.valve-world.net
September 2008