ORIGINAL

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR SUPREME COURT En Banc - M A N I L A Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr., - versus - The Office of the Court Administrator, (Presiding Judge, RTC, Br. 73, Malabon, M. M.), Complainant, vs. Respondent. A.M. No. RTJ-07-________ For: REOPENING OF JUDGE FLOROS CASE

X---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X

Acting Chief Justice LEONARDO A. QUISUMBING, Chief Justice REYNATO S. PUNO,

The Honorable Supreme Court, En Banc, Manila

VERIFIED SUPPLEMENT
To the ORIGINAL PETITION / Letter, With Leave of Court
[For RE-OPENING OF JUDGE FLOROS SEPARATION CASE based on G.R. No. 72670 September 12, 1986 - SATURNINA GALMAN vs. SANDIGANBAYAN]

- with ALTERNATIVE URGENT PETITIONS to ASSIGN i) a NEW DOCKET NUMBER to this Original Petition, and ii) to DESIGNATE Acting Chief Justice Leonardo A. Quisumbing or S. C. Associate Justice Gregory S. Ong, as New PONENTE of this New Case. Your Honors, Undersigned complainant Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr. respectfully moves for RE-OPENING OF his SEPARATION CASE based on G.R. No. 72670 September 12, 1986 - SATURNINA GALMAN vs. SANDIGANBAYAN and on the following grounds. Further, LEAVE OF COURT is hereby requested, to give due course to, admit & grant these petition / motions:
God is for us, who can be against us? He who did not spare his own Son but handed him over for us all, how will he not also give us everything else along with him? Who will bring a charge against God's chosen ones? It is God who acquits us. Who will condemn? It is Christ (Jesus) who died, rather, was raised, who also is at the right hand of God, who indeed intercedes for us. What will separate us from the love of Christ? Will anguish, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or the sword? As it is written: "For your sake we are being slain all the day; we are looked upon as sheep to be slaughtered." No, in all these things we conquer overwhelmingly through him who loved us. For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor present things, nor future things, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord. [Romans 8: 31-39].
If

SACRED MESSAGE & MISION Of ANGEL-LUIS / JUDGE FLORO

LUIS, as Angel of GOD, on FIRST FRIDAY JUNE 1, 2007, at 12:00 midnight, appeared to me, per the VIOLET and WHITE LIGHTS. He told me that he is an angel of God, as part of the 9 choirs of Angels and specifically the Angel of Death, in Exodus 12:23 as King of kings of all the 4 Elementals in the entire universe, the DESTROYER; he ORDERED me to write this SUPPLEMENT to the ORIGINAL PETITION / letter and submit it to this Court, for the entire JUDICIARY, for the greater glory of God.

Thru ACTING CHIEF Justice Leonardo A. Quisumbing.

Dear Justice Quisumbing,
In full TRANCE (this sacred and religious GIFT is below the ECSTASY of the saints, and is not the psychic trance which is so low and imperfect), I received the DIVINE message of LUIS, the ANGEL of God. As Angel of God, he asked this Court to RE-OPEN my case, to REINSTATE me as Judge on the following additional / supplemental RELIGIOUS, legal, constitutional and extraordinary GROUNDS: I. HYPOCRISY: The BITTERNESS / QUARRELS, BETWEEN JBC MEMBERS JUSTICE REGINO C. HERMOSISIMA, JR. & ATTY. TERESITA CRUZ-SISON IS THE ROOT CAUSE OF JUDGE FLOROS 7 YEARS SUFFERINGS. JUDGE FLORO (PRINCIPALLY) BLAMES JUSTICE HERMOSISIMA, JR.S UNJUST, IMMORAL AND PERSECUTORY BURRIAL OF THE TRUTH THAT CAUSED HIS SEPARATION FROM SERVICE. THIS PRESUMPTION AGAINST THE HOLY SPIRIT CANNOT BE PARDONED EVEN AFTER HIS DEATH. My Ponente, Madame Justice Nazario ruled / wrote with WISDOM:
There is no indication that Judge Floro is anything but an honorable man. And, in fact, in our disposition of the 13 charges against him, we have not found him guilty of gross misconduct or acts or corruption. xxx. Lest we be misconstrued, we do not denigrate such belief system. (xxx about Judge Floros uncommon beliefs). [A.M. # RTJ-99-1460, OCAD vs. Judge Floro, March 31, 2006].

JUSTICE HERMOSISIMA, JR. KNEW THAT IT WAS JUDGE FLOROS 1995 PREDICTION OF ATTY. T. C. SISONS 1996 STROKE WHICH CAUSED THE LONGEST SUSPENSION IN HISTORY. More specifically, what sins offend the Holy Spirit? There are six sins that offend the Holy Spirit. These are: xxx Impugning the known
2

truth (Clarification: To "impugn" the known truth means to attack it by word or argument, to resist it, to contradict it, or even to oppose the known truth or to challenge it as false.) [John Paul II, DeV 46] Such hardness of heart can lead to final impenitence and eternal loss." ON FEBRUARY 10, 2006, JUSTICE HERMOSISIMA, JR. CALLED JUDGE FLORO IN HIS JBC CHAMBERS (3 P.M.). HE TOLD JUDGE FLORO THAT IT WAS JUSTICE NAZARIO WHO APPROACHED HIM (AT A DINNER, WHICH FACT WAS CONFIRMED BY JUSTICE NAZARIO, THROUGH HER P.S. ATTY. PROVIDENCIA TIMBANGKAYA). JUSTICE NAZARIO IS FAVORABLE TO YOU! HE SAID. AT THAT POINT, JUDGE FLORO SHOUTED AT HIM, AND DEMANDED THAT HE SHOULD INFORM THE COURT IN WRITING, THAT JUDGE FLORO WAS SUSPENDED BECAUSE OF THE PREDICTION OF ATTY. T. C. SISONS STROKE. II. SPECIFIC / EXTRAORDINARY GROUNDS FOR RE-OPENING THE LANDMARK CASE OF JUDGE FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR. Eraps Downfall Predicted 1.

Judge FLORO was suspended for predicting in writing the downfall

of ERAP as the 13th unlucky President, on Good Friday, 1998. His ouster on January 20, 2001, resulted in PGMAS enthronement, and indirectly, the consequential appointment of the present incumbent and retired PGMA appointed Supreme Court Justices. INGRATITUDE Justice Hermosisima, Jr. asked Judge Floro to predict the appointment of Justices De Leon, Jr. and Corona. In exchange, as word of honor (although, verbal), he promised Judge Floro that, after the retirement of Ponente Justice Bernardo P. Pardo, Justices De Leon, Jr. and Corona will reinstate him (the latter, as successor of the ponente).
2.

Because of the failure of Justice Corona to be appointed (In re

Vallarta, due to opposition of C. J. Narvasa, etc.) and since Justice De Leon, Jr. was junior, Justice Hermosisima, Jr. represented to Judge Floro that he worked hard for the Malacanang appointment of these 2 magistrates. If you
3

can predict their appointments, you will be reinstated after the retirement of Justice Pardo. The Chief Justice does not like to offend Pardo. He said. (These are his very own words, in Judge Floros diary). When Justice AustriaMartinez became the Ponente due to seniority, Justice Hermosisima, Jr. failed in his promise. HE USED, USED and USED JUDGE FLORO. Judge Floro predicted the appointments of Justices CARPIO-MORALES & CALLEJO, SR. at PAOAY, ILOCOS NORTE. JUDGE FLORO PREDICTED THE 7 TIMES DISAPPOINTMENT OF JUSTICE ALFREDO L. BENIPAYO, WHICH PROPHECY BENEFITED THE INCUMBENT AND RETIRED PGMA APPOINTED JUSTICES. 3. By filing 7 Verified Oppositions to Justice Benipayos 7

applications and nominations, Judge Floro traveled to 7 Philippine tourist spots on 7 First Fridays, to predict the DISAPPOINTMENT of Justice Benipayo who signed his 7 years longest suspension due to the Order of Atty. T. C. Sison. Judge Floro predicted not only the appointment of Justice Nazario, but her destiny as the duly appointed PONENTE of Judge Floros separation case. Judge Floro was in constant, almost daily communication with Atty. Victoria Timbangkaya (partner of Judge Floros counsel of record, Rene A. V. Saguisag), the mother of Atty. Bibing Timbangkaya, p.s. of Justice Nazario, who drafted the Decision.
4.

On March 12, 2004, 4 p.m., at his JBC office,Justice Hermosisima,

Jr. in front of Justice Hormachuelos, insisted that Justice Nazario is just a Clerk of the Sandiganbayan. He convinced Judge Floro to predict the formers nominee, but Judge Floro had already predicted Justice Nazarios destiny. INTERSPERSED NEXT PAGES ARE THE TWIN HANDWRITINGS OF JUSTICE HERMOSISIMA, JR. WHICH PROVED BEYONG ANY DOUBT THAT HE BURIED THE TRUTH (12-24, 1999 & 11-12- 2003). Judge FLORO graduated FULL SECOND HONORS, ATENEO, 87.55%, placed 12th in the 1983 Bar Exams (21.3% passed, one of the hardest in history). His 91% criminal law review ATENEO grade by Dean Antonio L. Gregorio, was the 1978-85 unbroken record.

5.

As youngest RTC, NCJR, judge at the age of 45, appointed on

November 4 / 5, 1998, he applied on with the JBC on his birthday on November 5, 1997. Judge Floro holds the JBC record of having been nominated with only 5 votes (C.J. Narvasa broke the tie.). The JBC En Banc reconsidered with finality, by dismissing for lack of merit the PSYCHOGICAL and PSYCHIATRIC tests by the Supreme Court Medical Clinic. It confirmed the validity of the Makati Medical Centers psychiatrists / psychologists evaluation reports of Judge Floros mental fitness (Dr. Eduardo Jurilla, Dr. Pacita Salceda and Dr. Ma. Therasa Villasor, Ph. D.).
6.

Judge Floro accurately predicted the CA Justice appointment of his

classmates (Tonette) Brions husband ARTURO BRION, who could not be appointed due to several oppositions. In exchange, SECRETARY and MRS. ARTURO / TONETTE BRION gave Judge Floro 2 cards which indubitably showed their respect and gratitude to Judge Floros predictions. (Interspersed NEXT PAGES). Further, both spouses personally promised Judge Floro, that his case would be decided on 2004. Here is the evidence: March 29, 2004: 16:59:21 0918-9412923 (cel phone of T. Brion) Art says see him thusday april 1 p.m. he believes your case will be resolved in 3 months. (Tonette Brion). However, Tonette pressured Judge Floro to conduct Spanish card reading (to detect if CA Justice Brion was involved in girls gallivanting). Judge Floro begged Tonette but she insisted. THIS CAUSED her having traveled away to Ontario, Canada. And Justice Brion was so angry that he told Judge Floro: Nakakarating na kay Justice Corona ang mga predictions mo, galit sa iyo! Judge Floro wondered how their marital problems would cause the formers sufferings and eventual separation from service. Despite that, both spouses gave Judge Floro, the December, 2006 personalized Christmas card duly signed by them. Such card was returned by Judge Floro to this Court.

7.

Even if Judge Floros appeals were expunged from the records, God

hath been on his side. As prophesied that he would be reinstated on 2006-7 (at Podium, Ortigas, November 5, 2004, by his Angel, LUIS), Judge Floro made world judicial historys FIRST when he defeated all the worlds Chief Justice and high-profile barristers / lawyers, when The TIMES, UK, unanimously VOTE him as JUDGE OF THE YEAR on the very BIRTHDAY of Justice Nazario, on the natal and death day of his mother Milagros, on December 5, 2006. WORLD-FAMOUS & IMMORTAL IN WORLD JUDICIAL HISTORY
8.

Not even the past and present foreign Chief Justices could equal the

immense publicity, sympathy and world recognition of Judge Floro as IMMORTAL in judicial history. WHY? Not only New York Times, BBC, Reuters, AFP (more than 100 world news reports, all front pages), RIPLEYS, 250 Chuck Shepherds News of the Weird newspapers worldwide, but more than 1,000 blogs and hundreds of forums discussed his world-famous case with emotions, intelligence and sarcasm. UNSELFISH, JUDGE FLORO PREDICTED (BEFORE MARILYN PUNO SANTIAGO AND ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE QUISUMBING) 1) THAT LUIS WILL HELP JUSTICE PUNO BE APPOINTED AS 22nd CHIEF JUSTICE, AND 2) THAT SEN. MYRIAM SANTIAGO WILL NOT MAKE IT, RESPECTIVELY.
9.

St. Pauls GIFT OF PROPHECY, in his letter to the Corinthians,

inter alia, is a blessing (1 Cor 12:10, 1 Cor 12:28, Rom 12:6, Eph 4:11) or endowment, spiritual or divine in nature. It knows no bounds except the limits set by the Holy Spirit. Perforce, or accordingly, Judge Floro must be vindicated, despite his NEGATIVE predictions (which are also GODs ways of cleansing the spirits in the judiciary - gifts of healing, 1 Cor 12:9, 12:28). With all sincerity, and in GOOD FAITH, he tried his best to predict also the appointment of Justice Quisumbing, but nonetheless, the latter had repeatedly

been shared this blessing as ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (gift of faith, 1 Cor 12:9).

RELIEF
IN THE LIGHT OF THE FOREGOING, it is respectfully prayed that the instant SUPPLEMENT be duly granted. Undersigned begs leave of Court to admit and grant the foregoing and following motions and prayers:

VERIFIED SUPPLEMENT
To the ORIGINAL PETITION / Letter, With Leave of Court
[For RE-OPENING OF JUDGE FLOROS SEPARATION CASE based on G.R. No. 72670 September 12, 1986 - SATURNINA GALMAN vs. SANDIGANBAYAN]

- with ALTERNATIVE URGENT PETITIONS to ASSIGN i) a NEW DOCKET NUMBER to this Original Petition, and ii) to DESIGNATE Acting Chief Justice Leonardo A. Quisumbing or S. C. Associate Justice Gregory S. Ong, as New PONENTE of this New Case. Other relief and remedies are likewise prayed for. This 1st day of June, 2007, at Malolos City, BULACAN. Judge FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR. VERIFICATION and CERTIFICATION of Non-Forum-Shopping & Affidavit of Service
Republic of the Philippines) Malolos City, BULACAN ) S.S. I, JUDGE FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR., under oath, depose and say, that: I am the COMLAINANT in the above-entitled case and I read, caused the preparation of, and signed the foregoing pleading. And all the allegations/contents thereof/therein are true and correct of my own personal knowledge or based on authentic records. I certify that: I have not theretofore commenced any action or filed any claim involving the same issues in any court, tribunal or quasi-judicial agency, and to the best of our knowledge, no such other action or claim is pending therein, EXCEPT THE DISMISSED A.C. 7324, and the DISMISSED AM NO. RTJ-99-1460, and if there is such other pending action or claim, a complete statement of the present status thereof will be made, but there is none; if I should thereafter learn that the same or similar action or claim has been filed or is pending, I shall report that fact within 5

days there from to the court wherein the aforesaid complaint or initiatory pleading has been filed. I CERTIFY that on May 7/8, 07, I personally served copies of this pleading , upon respondent, personally thru the OCAD, in accordance with Secs. 3, 5, 7, 13 and 12 of Rule 13, Rules of Court, by personally filing said copies at the OCAD, as evidenced by the rubber stamp receipts of the office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I signed this affidavit, this 8th day of June, 2007, at Malolos City, BULACAN.

JUDGE FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR., affiant.

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me, on this 8th day of June, 2007, hereat Malolos City, Bulacan, affiant exhibited to me his CTC NO. CC12005 # 21783592, issued at Malolos, Bulacan, on 2-27, 2006.
DOC. NO. ______, PAGE NO. ______, BOOK NO. ____, SERIES OF 2007. BERNAR D. FAJARDO Notary Public, Until Jan.15, 2008, PTR NO. 0365915, 1- 2,07, Atty.s Roll No. 33633. Malolos, Bulacan.

NOTICE & REQUEST

TO: Atty. Ma. Luisa D. Villarama, Clerk of Court, En Banc, SUPREME COURT, MANILA - c/o Atty. FELIPA ANAMA & Atty. LANI PAPA, SUPREME COURT, Manila Please DOCKET and AGENDUM the foregoing pleading for the deliberation and Resolution of the Honorable Court, immediately upon receipt hereof.

JUDGE FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR., Complainant,

123 Dahlia, Alido, Malolos, 3000 BULACAN, Tel/#(044) 662-82-03; cel # 0927-3440957
(Presiding Judge, Branch 73, RTC, MALABON, NCJR, M.M.)
[I.D. Number: RTCJ-317 / EDP Number: 38676300; ROLL OF ATTORNEYS NO. 32800, Pg. No. 60, Book No. XIV]

COPY FURNISHED: (By Personal Service):

Office of the Court Administrator,

Supreme Court, Manila, and all the SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, and

Supreme Court Associate Justice Gregory S. Ong,

8

SANDIGANBAYAN, Centennial Building, Commonwealth Ave., Batasan Road, Quezon City, M. M., Tel. # 951-4521, and

The Supreme Court Associate Justices, by personal service.

Explanation on Service by Registered Mail: Complainant, in compliance with Secs. 7, 11, Rule 13, 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, states that due to lack of time and messenger and impracticality, he served copies of this pleading to S. C. Associate Justice Gregory S. Ong, by LBC registered mail with return card with attached receipts, pasted hereunder.

JUDGE FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR. 123 Dalia, Alido, Bulihan, Malolos City, 3000 Bulacan