Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT We have conducted an experiment of cooling tower apparatus on 28th October 2011 at pilot plan. The objectives of this experiment is to analyze and identify the water cooling tower system. We run this experiment three times for which the first experiment is conducted with fully opened blower. We varied the heating load with the value of o.5 kW, 1.0 kW and 1.5 kW. The second experiment is to compare the system in the difference of the opening of the blower. In the third experiment, we varied the water flow rate in value of 1.0 LPM, 1.2 LPM and 1.4 LPM. The data of this experiment is jotted down in the result sheet.
Wet cooling towers or simply open circuit cooling towers operate on the principle of evaporation. The working fluid and the evaporated fluid (usually water) are one and the same.
Dry cooling towers operate by heat transfer through a surface that separates the working fluid from ambient air, such as in a tube to air heat exchanger, utilizing convective heat transfer. They do not use evaporation.
Fluid coolers or closed circuit cooling towers are hybrids that pass the working fluid through a tube bundle, upon which clean water is sprayed and a fan-induced draft applied. The resulting heat transfer performance is much closer to that of a wet cooling tower, with the advantage provided by a dry cooler of protecting the working fluid from environmental exposure and contamination.
In a wet cooling tower (or open circuit cooling tower), the warm water can be cooled to a temperature lower than the ambient air dry-bulb temperature, if the air is relatively dry (see dew point and psychrometrics). As ambient air is drawn past a flow of water, a small portion of the water evaporate, the energy required by that portion of the water to evaporate is taken from the remaining mass of water reducing his temperature (approximately by 970 BTU for each pound of evaporated water). Evaporation results in saturated air conditions, lowering the temperature of the water process by the tower to a value close to wet bulb air temperature, which is lower than the ambient dry bulb air temperature, the difference determined by the humidity of the ambient air. To achieve better performance (more cooling), a medium called fill is used to increase the surface area and the time of contact between the air and water flows. Splash fillconsists of material placed to interrupt the water flow causing splashing. Film fill is composed of thin sheets of material (usually PVC) upon which the water flows. Both methods create increased surface area and time of contact between the fluid (water) and the gas (air).
With respect to drawing air through the tower, there are three types of cooling towers:
Natural draft, which utilizes buoyancy via a tall chimney. Warm, moist air naturally rises due to the density differential to the dry, cooler outside air. Warm moist air is less dense than drier air at the same pressure. This moist air buoyancy produces a current of air through the tower.
Mechanical draft, which uses power driven fan motors to force or draw air through the tower.
Induced draft: A mechanical draft tower with a fan at the discharge which pulls air through tower. The fan induces hot moist air out the discharge. This produces low entering and high exiting air velocities, reducing the possibility of recirculation in which discharged air flows back into the air intake. This fan/fin arrangement is also known as draw-through. (see Image 3)
Forced draft: A mechanical draft tower with a blower type fan at the intake. The fan forces air into the tower, creating high entering and low exiting air velocities. The low exiting velocity is much more susceptible to recirculation. With the fan on the air intake, the fan is more susceptible to complications due to freezing conditions. Another disadvantage is that a forced draft design typically requires more motor horsepower than an equivalent induced draft design. The forced draft benefit is its ability to work with high static pressure. They can be installed in more confined spaces and even in some indoor situations. This fan/fill geometry is also known asblow-through. (see Image 4)
Fan assisted natural draft. A hybrid type that appears like a natural draft though airflow is assisted by a fan.
Hyperboloid (sometimes incorrectly known as hyperbolic) cooling towers (Image 1) have become the design standard for all natural-draft cooling towers because of their structural strength and minimum usage of material. The hyperboloid shape also aids in accelerating the upward convective air flow, improving cooling efficiency. They are popularly associated with nuclear power plants. However, this association is misleading, as the same kind of cooling towers are often used at large coal-fired power plants as well. Similarly, not all nuclear power plants have cooling towers, instead cooling their heat exchangers with lake, river or ocean water.
Crossflow Crossflow is a design in which the air flow is directed perpendicular to the water flow (see diagram below). Air flow enters one or more vertical faces of the cooling tower to meet the fill material. Water flows (perpendicular to the air) through the fill by gravity. The air continues through the fill and thus past the water flow into an open plenum area. A distribution or hot water basin consisting of a deep pan with holes or nozzles in the bottom is utilized in a crossflow tower. Gravity distributes the water through the nozzles uniformly across the fill material.
Counterflow In a counterflow design the air flow is directly opposite to the water flow (see diagram below). Air flow first enters an open area beneath the fill media and is then drawn up vertically. The water is sprayed through pressurized nozzles and flows downward through the fill, opposite to the air flow.
The interaction of the air and water flow allow a partial equalization and evaporation of water.
The air, now saturated with water vapor, is discharged from the cooling tower. A collection or cold water basin is used to contain the water after its interaction with the air flow.
Both crossflow and counterflow designs can be used in natural draft and mechanical draft cooling towers.
10
It may be shown that, for the finite element dz of the tower in Figure 3, energy balances of the water and air streams in the tower are related to the mass transfer by the equation Cpw mw dTw = Ka(H-h)dV where H is the specific enthalpy of the saturated boundary layer per unit mass of dry air, assumed to be at the local water temperature within dz, and h is the specific enthalpy of the bulk air per unit mass of dry air. K is the mass transfer coefficient per unit plane area, a is the area of contact between the air and water per unit volume of packing, and V is the volume occupied by the packing, Cpw is the specific heat, mw is the mass flow-rate, and Tw is the water temperature. The small change in the mass of the water is neglected. Equation below is integrated down the column to give an average mass transfer coefficient
11
SCHEMATIC REPRESENTATION OF THE AIR AND WATER STREAMS ENTERING AND LEAVING A BLOCK OF PACKING. One numerical solution of this equation can be written in terms of a corrected arithmetic mean driving force (H - h)m Ka/Vmw= Cpw (T2 - T1)(H - h)m Using the driving forces 1, 2 and m obtained in the previous calculation the correction factor f to estimate the corrected mean driving force (H - h)m can be obtained Thus, (H - h)m = f m = f(H3 - h3)
12
The range of cooling water is given by: Twater in Twater out The approach of cooling tower is given by: Twater out Twb air The effectiveness of cooling tower is given by:
The total cooling load is given by: Pump input + heating load The air mass flowrate per unit area is given by:
13
14
7. The temperature set point of temperature controller is set to 45 C. the 1.0 kW water heaters is switched on and the water is heated up until approximately 40 C. 8. The pump is switched on and the control valve V1 is slowly opened. the water flow rate is set to 2.0 LPM. a steady operation where the water is distributed and flowing uniformly through the packing is obtained. 9. The fan damper is opened fully, and the fan is switched on. Check that the differential pressure sensor is giving reading: i. To measure the differential pressure across the orifice, open valve V4 and V5: close valve V3 and V6. ii. To measure the differential pressure across the column, open valve V3 and valve V6: close valve V4 and V5. 10. The unit is let run for about 20 minutes, for the float valve to correctly adjust the level in the load tank. Refill the make-up tank as required. 11. Now, the unit is ready for use.
o
15
EXPERIMENT 1:EFFECT OF HEATING LOAD 1. The blower is opened fully. 2. The 0.5 kW of water is switched on. 3. The water flow rate is set to 1.0 LPM. 4. The fan and pump are switched on. 5. The unit is let to run for 10 minutes. 6. After the steady operation is obtained, all the readings are taken. 7. The operation is run three times to take the average. 8. The above steps are repeated twice for varied heating load of 1.0 and 1.5 kW.
16
EXPERIMENT 2:BLOWER OPENED. 1. The blower is opened partially. 2. The 0.5 kW of water is switched on. 3. The water flow rate is set to 1.0 LPM. 4. The fan and pump are switched on. 5. The unit is let to run for 10 minutes. 6. After the steady operation is obtained, all the readings are taken. 7. The operation is run three times to take the average. Note:for fully opened blower, no need to run the experiment because all the varied properties are just the same with experiment 1 for 0.5 kW of heating load. EXPERIMENT 3:WATER FLOWRATE 1. The blower is opened fully. 2. The 0.5 kW of water is switched on. 3. The water flow rate is set to 1.2 LPM. 4. The fan and pump are switched on. 5. The unit is let to run for 10 minutes. 6. After the steady operation is obtained, all the readings are taken. 7. The operation is run three times to take the average. 8. The above steps are repeated one more time for 1.4 LPM of water flowrate. Note:no need to run the operation for 1.0 LPM of water flowrate because all the varied properties are just the same with experiment 1 for 1.0 LPM of water flowrate and 0.5 kW of heating load.
17
T1 T2 T6 D.P Q
T1 T2 T6 D.P Q
18
T1 T2 T6 D.P Q
19
20
21
EXPERIMENT 2 Heating load:0.5 kW Water flowrate:1 LPM Blower:half opened 1) Range of cooling tower
22
Note:calculation for experiment 3 is just the same with experiment 1 since the variables are the same.
23