Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SeriesoflectureonAsiaPacificSummerSchoolonSmartStructuresandControl
Outline
I t d ti Introduction
Definition Objectives Scope
ExperimentalMethods Classification
TypeofExcitation TypeofResponse
1.Introduction:Definition
Aprocesstodeveloporimprovemathematicalrepresentation ofastructuralsystemusingexperimentallyobtainedstructural response(s). Mathematicalrepresentationofastructuralsystem:Mass, p y Stiffness,Damping,Flexibility,Connectivity Experimentally obtained structural response : vibrations, static Experimentallyobtainedstructuralresponse:vibrations,static response/deflection,strainresponseetc. System identification is a broad term when systemrefersto Systemidentificationisabroadterm,when system refers to structuralsystem,thetermstructuralidentificationis commonlyused.
1.Introduction:Objectives
WhySystemIdentificationforconstructedstructures?
1. ModelValidationofnewlyconstructedstructures d l lid i f l d
verifyassumptionsindesignmodel(e.g.boundarycondition,nonlinear
behavior,energydissipationmechanism/damping) verifyperformanceofcontrolsystem(e.g.baseisolation,TunedMass Damper,etc)
2. ModelUpdating
obtainFEMcalibratedstructuralmodel
adjuststructuralparametersafterretrofitormodification d l f f df
1.Introduction:Objectives
WhySystemIdentificationforconstructedstructures?
4.EarthquakeEngineering q g g
performanceofstructureduringearthquake postearthquakestructuralassessment
5.WindEngineering
verification/comparisonwithwindtunnelresults aerodynamicperformance(e.g.aerodynamicdampingoflongspanbridges)
1.Introduction:Scopes GlobalandLocal
ExampleofGlobalStructuralIdentification:Modalidentification Example of Global Structural Identification : Modal identification ofinstrumentedbridgesforglobalassessmentofthe structure
YokohamaBayBridge
1.Introduction:Scopes GlobalandLocal
ExampleofLocalStructuralIdentification:Evaluationofdamping E l fL lS l Id ifi i E l i fd i onstaycableofcablestayedbridgetoassestheeffectivenessof cabledampersystem.
StonecuttersBridge
CableHydraulicdamper
Singlemodedecayresponse ofthecable:f=0.49Hz
=0.055487
-2
-2.5
-3
-3.5
Freevibrationtestofstaycablebypulland releasetest.
-4
-4.5
-5 80
Time (s)
2.ExpMethods:ClassificationofRequiredData
Therequireddataisdatacollectedduringexperimentandcanbe classifiedinto: Excitation:measurementsmadeofdisturbanceforces, p pressure,impact,stressappliedtothestructure. , p , pp Response:measurementsmadeofthereactionsofthe structurestotheapplieddisturbance,suchas,deflection, displacement,velocity,acceleration,strainetc.
2.ExpMethods:TypeofExcitation
Theexcitationcanbeclassifiedas: 1. Dynamicorstatic(i.e.accordingtowhetherornottheyengage inertialeffects) i ti l ff t ) 2. Accordingtocontrollability,and 3. Accordingtomeasurability 3 According to measurability
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
2.ExpMethods:StaticLoads
Controllable(measurableandunmeasurable)staticloads
Relativelyrareforfullscaleexperimentsonrealstructuresbecauseofthe y p scaleoftheloadrequiredtogenerateameasurableeffect. Commonexampleisprooftestingofbridgesofteninvolvinguseofheavy Common example is proof testing of bridges often involving use of heavy vehicles,eitherstationaryormoving
Uncontrollable(measurableandunmeasurable)staticloads
Generallyincludeelementsofdynamicloadandresponsemonitoring, ll l d l fd l d d particularlyinthecaseoftraffic andwind whichgeneratequasistatic and dynamicresponse.
2.ExpMethods:DynamicLoads ControllableMeasurable
Forcedvibrationtest(FVT)
Transferfunctionsorfrequencyresponsefunctions(FRFs)scale input(forcing)tooutput(response)viaeithermassorstiffness socanbothbeidentified,alongwithhighqualityinformation so can both be identified along with high quality information aboutdissipativeeffects(mathematicallyrealisedasviscous damping) Examples:massexciters,Electrodynamicshakers, instrumentedhammer instrumented hammer
2.ExpMethods:DynamicLoads ControllableUnMeasurable
Manualexcitation
Impulseresponsefunctions(IRF)orfreevibrationresponse. Neithermassnorstiffnesscanbeidentified.Modalfrequency anddampingcanbeestimatedquiteaccurately. Examples:Impacthammer,peoplejump,dropweighttest, Snap backororsteprelaxationtest Snapback or or step relaxation test
2.ExpMethods:DynamicLoads ControllableUnMeasurableExcitation
Controllablebutunmeasurabledynamicloads ll bl b bl d l d Manualexcitation:ImpactHammerTest
Freevibrationresponseofthebridgesubjected toimpacthammer
2.ExpMethods:DynamicLoads ControllableUnMeasurableExcitation
Manualexcitation:DropWeightTest l h
Givingexcitationtoashortspan Giving excitation to a short span bridgebydroppingsandbagweight Note:whiledropweighttestiseffective inexcitingthefreevibrationresponse ofthestructure,additionaldampingis expectedasthedroppedweighttends toincreasethedamping. to increase the damping
ExampleofFreevibrationresponseofthebridge excitedbydroppedweight
2.ExpMethods:DynamicLoads ControllableUnMeasurableExcitation
A cceleration (m ) /s
-0.5
-1
-1.5 80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
Time (s)
Flowcharttoobtaindampingvalueofastaycable
FreeVibrationResponse ib i RawData FrequencyResponse
Givingexcitationtoastaycablebypulland releasedtest
2.ExpMethods:DynamicLoads ControllableUnMeasurableExcitation
Vehicleexcitation: 1. Responselargerthanambient vibrationresponse. 2. Stressandaccelerationresponsescan beconductedsimultaneously 3. Effectofvehiclebridgeinteraction shouldbeconsideredinanalysis. should be considered in analysis
Exampleofaccelerationresponsewhenatruck passingabridge
2.ExpMethods:DynamicLoads UncontrollableMeasurableExcitation
Example:YokohamaBayBridge,instrumentedcablestayedbridgenearTokyo
2.ExpMethods:DynamicLoads UncontrollableunmeasurableExcitation
Ambientexcitation:wind,traffic,andunmeasured microtremor.
Correlationsbetweenresponseareusedtoestimatemodal p p properties.Modeshapesunscaled.Treatedasstochastic p systemidentification. Example:periodicambientvibrationmeasurementand instrumentedbridgesandbuildings.
2.ExpMethods:DynamicLoads UncontrollableunmeasurableExcitation
Treatedasstationaryrandomprocess.
2.ExpMethods:DynamicLoads UncontrollableunmeasurableExcitation
Exampleofverticalaccandthespectrumofamediumspanhighwaybridgetotraffic.
2.ExpMethods:TypeofResponseExcitation
Static:Strain,Deflection Static : Strain Deflection Dynamic: Acceleration Relativeofabsolutedisplacement Velocity Inclination Strain Stress W t P WaterPressure Structuralandenvironmentaltemperature Wind Velocity WindVelocity WindDirection
3.AnalysisMethods:Classification
ParametricandNonparametricModels d d l
ParametricModel Parametric Model Structuralmodelandinitialestimateofmodelparametersare knownapriori.Measuredresponsesarefittedtoobtainthe bestestimateofmodelparameters. NonParametricModel Modelstructureisnotspecifiedapriori.Structuralresponses areusedtoobtainmodelparametersbymeansofdynamical are used to obtain model parameters by means of dynamical systemandquantitiessuchascross/autocorrelations,transfer function/frequencyresponsefunction.
3.AnalysisMethods:Classification
ExampleofParametricModel p OutputErrorMinimizationforsystemidentificationusingseismic response.
Theoreticalmodelorstructural Theoretical model or structural modelisrequired
F=objectivefunction
3.AnalysisMethods:Classification
ExampleofNon ParametricModel Example of NonParametric Model StateSpaceSystemidentificationusingseismicresponse.
Bymodelingtheinput outputrelationshipofseismic inducedvibrationusingstate space By modeling the inputoutput relationship of seismicinduced vibration using statespace modelandrealizationofobservability matrix,systemmatricesA,B,RandDcanbe obtainedandmodalparametersarerealized.
3.AnalysisMethods:TypesofModel
1. StructuralModel 1 Structural Model Systemismodeledintermsofmass,stiffness,orflexibility,and dampingmatrices. Geometricdistributionofmass,stiffnessanddampingareknown Structuralconnectivitybetweendegreeoffreedomispreserved
Equationofmotion:
&& & Mu (t ) + Cu (t ) + Ku (t ) = Bz (t )
0 A = exp 1 M K I t 1 M C
x ( k + 1) = [ A ] x ( k ) + [ B ] z ( k )
y (k ) = [R ] x(k ) + [ D ]z (k )
Goal:ToIndentifysystemmatrixAinitsoriginalform,fromwhichthemass,stiffness anddampingmatricescanberetrieved.
3.AnalysisMethods:TypesofModel
2. Modal Model ModalModel Systemisdefinedinmodalcoordinatesdescribingthevibratory motionofstructuresintermsofmodalfrequency,modaldamping andmodeshapes(alsomodephaseangleforcomplexmodes) Geometricdistributionofmass,stiffnessanddampingand informationonstructuralconnectivityarenotpreserved. Describestheresonantspatial(modeshapes)andtemporalofthe structure. t t Modalparametersareanalogoustoeigensolutionofstucturalmass andstiffness.
Equationofmotionindiscretedynamicsystem, wheresystemmatrixAistobeindentified
x ( k + 1) = [ A ] x ( k ) + [ B ] z ( k )
y (k ) = [R ] x(k ) + [ D ]z (k )
Goal:ToIndentifysystemmatrixAbysolvingthe Eigenvalue problemanddeterminethemodes.
3.AnalysisMethods:TypesofModel
3.Non PhysicalNumericalModel 3. NonPhysical Numerical Model Doesnothavephysicalrelationshipwiththestructure(i.e.nospatial information,nogeometrydistributionofmass,stiffness,anddamping) , g y , , p g) Simplyaparametercurvefitofthegivenmathematicalmodeltothe measureddata. Examples:AutoRegressiveMovingAverage(ARMA)anditsvariants, RationalPolynomialModeletc. Somecanbeconvertedtomodalmodelform.
Example:AutoRegressiveMovingAverage(ARMA)Modelwheretheautoregressive coefficientscanberelatedtomodalparameters
dy (t ) d n 1 y (t ) d n y (t ) + a n 1 + L a1 a 0 y (t ) n 1 n dt dt dt d m u (t ) d m 1u (t ) du d (t ) = bm + bm 1 + L b1 b0 u (t ) m 1 m du dt du
3.AnalysisMethods:Domain 1. FrequencyDomain PeakPickingMethod Peak Picking Method TransferFunction/FrequencyResponseFunction/Impulse ResponseFunction. AverageNormalizedPowerSpectrumDensity(ANPSD) ComplexExponentialFrequencyDomainMethod(Schmerr 1982) Eigensystem RealizationAlgorithminFrequencyDomain(ERA FD)(Juang &Suzuki1988) FrequencyDomainDecomposition(Brincker etal.2001) i ii ( i k l 2001)
28
3.AnalysisMethods:Domain 2. TimeDomain IbrahimTimeDomain(ITD)(Ibrahim&Mikulcik 1973) LeastSquaredComplexExponentialMethod(LSCE)(Brown 1979) Polyreference ComplexExponentialMethod(PRCE)(Vold etal. 1982) Eigensystem RealizationAlgorithm(ERA)(Juang &Pappa 1985) StochasticSubspaceIdentification(Overschee &DeMoor 1991)
29
3.AnalysisMethods:Domain
3. Cross TimeFrequency Domain CrossTime FrequencyDomain Representsfrequencyevolutionastimeprogresses. Candetectnon linearityandnon stationarysignals Can detect nonlinearity and nonstationary signals
ShortTimeFourierTransform(STFT) Waveletbasedsystemidentification EmpiricalModeDecomposition HilbertHuangTransform (shouldbecarefullyappliedsinceEMDlacksphysicalmeaningof (should be carefully applied since EMD lacks physical meaning of signals)
30
3.AnalysisMethods:DirectandIndirectMethodTimeDomain
3.AnalysisMethods:Checklist
TypesofInputsandOutputs f d Controllabledynamicloads MeasuredInput(s) MassexciterandShaker M i d Sh k InstrumentedImpactHammer UnmeasuredInput(s) Unmeasured Input (s) Manualexcitation(peoplejumping) Snapback, or step relaxation Swingingbelltoexciteacathedraltower Uncontrollabledynamicloads MeasuredInput(s) seismicexcitation(SingleInput) seismicmultipleexcitation(MultipleInput) Uncontrollabledynamicloads UnmeasuredInput(s) ambientvibrationtest(operationalmodal analysis) windexcitation trafficexcitation microtremorwithunmeasuredinput SystemIdentificationMethod d f h d
Transferfunction,SISOorSIMO Transferfunctionmatrix,MIMO
32
4.Uncertainties Uncertaintyisunavoidableinunderstandingtheresultsof systemidentification.Modalpropertiesaresusceptibleto variationevenwhenstructuralconditionremainsthesame. variation even when structural condition remains the same Howtoquantifytheconfidenceoftheidentifiedmodal properties? 1. Errorpropagationanalysisusingperturbationmethod 1 Error propagation analysis using perturbation method 2. MonteCarloSimulation 3. BootstrapMethod
33
4.Uncertainties:Errorpropagationanalysisusingperturbation
ExampleoferrorpropagationinSystemRealizationusingInformationMatrix Example of error propagation in System Realization using Information Matrix Input[Up] CorrelationMatrix: CorrelationMatrix Ryy()=Ryy(0)+Ryy Up()=Up(0)+Up Up() = Up(0) + Up OfInputOutput Of Input Output [Ryy],[Ryu],[Ruu] Ryu()=Ryu(0)+Ryu
Yp()=Yp(0)+Yp Output[Yp] Ruu() Ruu(0) + Ruu Ruu() =Ruu(0)+Ruu
InformationMatrix InformationMatrix [Rhh] Rhh()=Rhh(0)+Rhh SingularValue SingularValue Decomposition p Decomposition D iti RealizationofSystem RealizationofSystem Matrix Matrix[A] [ ] A()=A(0)+A
4.Uncertainties:Bootstrap Analysis
Exampleofinvestigationoftheeffectofvariabilityandtoestimatetheconfidence Example of investigation of the effect of variability and to estimate the confidence boundsofidentifiedmodalparametersbyNEXTERA
Randomlyselected CCF1,CCF2,CCF3,CCFN Ensemble1 (Mcomponent) (M t) CCF1,CCF5,CCF3,CCFM ComputeCCFaverage ERA
1,1,1
Randomlyselected
ERA
2,2,2
. . .
Randomlyselected EnsembleP (Mcomponent) CCF4,CCF6,CCF2,CCFM ComputeCCFaverage ERA
. . .
p,p,p
CCF:Crosscorrelationfunction
Estimatemeanvalueand 95%Confidencebound
35
4.Uncertainties:Bootstrap Analysis Distributionofmodalparametersandtheirmeanvaluesand Distribution of modal parameters and their mean values and confidencelevelcanbeobtained
Modalparametersareconsideredasstochasticvariablethathavedistribution Modal parameters are considered as stochastic variable that have distribution withcertainstatisticalcharacteristics.Thereforedecisionmadeonstructural conditioninvolvedstatisticalconfidence.
36
5.Examples:AmbientVibrationMeasurementofSuspensionBridge
3SpanSuspensionBridge BridgeType: Simplysupportedatthe tower Length: 1,380m Span: 330720330m TotalDeckWidth: 20m
5.Examples:AmbientVibrationMeasurementofSuspensionBridge
UsingNEXTERA U i NEXT ERA ModalParameters M d lP t
38
5.Examples:AmbientVibrationMeasurementofSuspensionBridge
Structuralidentification:effectoffrictionforceandaerodynamicforcesonidentified frequencyanddamping(Nagayama et.al2005)
39
5.Examples:SeismicInducedSystemIdentificationofCableStayedBridge
40
5.Examples:SeismicInducedSystemIdentificationofCableStayedBridge
Adatadrivenidentificationmethodwasappliedconsideringmultipleinputexcitation pp g p p andmultipleresponses(MIMOSystem)
41
5.Examples:SeismicInducedSystemIdentificationofCableStayedBridge
Withdenseinstrumentationandgoodqualityofseismicrecordsweidentifybridge g q y y g modalparametersuntilhighorder
42
5.Examples:SeismicInducedSystemIdentificationofCableStayedBridge
Observationoftheperformanceofseismicisolationdevicesusing1st longitudinal p g g mode(Siringoringo &Fujino 2008)
(a)TypicalslipslipMode (Earthquake19900220)
(b)TypicalMixedSlipStickMode(Earthquake19950703)
FromthefirstlongitudinalmodewecanobservebehaviorofLinkBearingConnection g g duringearthquake. Differentbehaviour ofLinkBearingConnectionattheendpierswasobservedduring differentlevelofearthquakeexcitation. different level of earthquake excitation Itwasfoundthattheexpectedslipslipmodeonlyoccurredduringlargeearthquake.
43
SuggestedReadingsMaterials: TheoreticalandExperimentalModalAnalysisbyMaia,Silva,He,Lieven etal. Theoretical and Experimental Modal Analysis by Maia Silva He Lieven et al AppliedSystemIdentificationbyJer NanJuang MonitoringandAssessmentofStructuresbyGSTArmer TheStateoftheArtinStructuralIdentificationofConstructedFacilities(ASCEReport1999)
Q&S
Questions andSharing?
44