You are on page 1of 32

He Whakaputanga O Te Rangatiratanga O Nga Hapu O Aotearoa 1835 Declaration of Origin and Ownership of Legal Name and Claim of Rights: I

Kevin - (Wayne - Bluegum:) his Whanau, heirs, successors Mokopuna Tangata Whenua - Internal Lawful Sovereigns in Right of the Dominion/State o Aotearoa (NZ), in this common law jurisdiction, do hereby make my Oath as having been duly affirmed, claim the following as my complete truth and law as of right: Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 [Maori Land Act 1993
Section 1

An Act to Reform the Constitutional Law relating to Government over all Peoples of Aotearoa (NZ) Lands, Forests, Fisheries, Estates and all other Treasures, as Taonga tuku iho: in accordance with the Principles set out in the Preamble to this Act. The Preamble: N te mea i riro n te Tiriti o Waitangi i motuhake ai te noho a te iwi me to Karauna (UK): , n te mea e tika ana kia whakautia an te wairua o te wi riro atu ai te Kwanatanga kia riro mai ai te mau tonu o te Rangatiratanga e takoto nei i roto i te Tiriti o Waitangi: n te mea e tika ana kia marama ko te whenua he taonga tuku iho e tino whakaaro nuitia ana e te iwi Mori, , n tera he whakahau kia mau tonu taua whenua ki te iwi nona, ki ratou whanau, hapuu hoki, [ki te whakangungu i ng wahi tapu]: , hei whakamama i te nohotanga, i te whakahaeretanga, i te whakamahitanga o taua whenua hei painga m te hunga nona, m ratou whanau, hap hoki: , n te mea e tika ana kia t tonu he Kooti Paramata Rangatira Ateha o Nga Tikanga Maori ki Marae, a, kia whakatakototia he tikanga hei awhina i te iwi Mori kia taea ai enei kaupapa te whakatinana: Whereas the Treaty of Waitangi established the special relationship between The Confederation of United Tribes o Aotearoa and The British Crown of the United Kingdom: And whereas [it is to be] that the spirit of the exchange of Kawanatanga for the protection of Rangatiratanga embodied in the Treaty of Waitangi be reaffirmed: And whereas [it is to be] recognised that full chieftainship over the people, the land, the forest, the fisheries, the estates and all other treasures as Taonga Tuku Iho of special significance to the Maori people, and for that reason, to promote the retention of those treasures in the hands of its owners, their whanau, and their hapu, [and to protect wahi tapu]: And to facilitate the occupation, development, and utilisation of those treasures for the benefit of its owners, their whanau, and their hapu: And whereas [it is to be] to maintain Te Kooti Paramata Maori or Te Kooti Rangatira Ateha in accordance with Tikanga Maori on the Marae and to establish mechanisms to assist the Maori people to achieve the implementation of these principles: That in terms of section 5, 250, 253, 284(2)(u) of the 1993 Act, and in terms of section 268(3) and Section 17 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Amendment Act 1994; and as referred to in section 2(3) the Maori version of Part I and Part II of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 [Maori Land Act 1993], The Maori version of the Court means Te Kooti Rangatira Ateha or Te Kooti Paremata Maori, or both (which must and) shall prevail. In the event of any conflict in meaning, Contra Preferentum shall prevail, the Maori version takes precedence.

As a Mokopuna of The Confederation of United Tribes o Aotearoa, being part of the unextinguished Native Title, I Kevin-(Wayne-Bluegum:) his Whanau, heirs and successors, doth re-affirm articles 1 to 4 of He Whakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Aotearoa 1835 which states:

Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 1 of 32

st

Native/Aboriginal Title (Territorial) He Whakaputanga O Te Rangatiratanga O Aotearoa (28th October 1835) MAORI TO ENGLISH TRANSLATION, INTERPRETATION AND LEGAL UNDERSTANDING 1. We the hereditary Chiefs and Heads of the Tribes of the Northern Parts of New Zealand being Assembled at Waitangi, in the Bay of Islands, on this 28th day of October 1835, declare the Independence of our Country, which is hereby Constituted and Declared to be an Independent State 1835, under the designation of The Confederation of the United Tribes o Aotearoa. 2. All Sovereign power and authority within the territories of The Confederation of United Tribes o Aotearoa is hereby Declared to reside entirely and exclusively in the hereditary Chiefs and Heads of the Tribes in their Collective Capacity, who also Declare that they SHALL Not permit any legislative authority separate from themselves in their Collective Capacity to exist, nor any function of Government to be exercised within the said Territories, Unless by Persons Appointed by them, and acting under the Authority of Laws Regularly Enacted by them in Congress Assembled. 3. The hereditary Chiefs and Heads of the Tribes Agree to Meet in Congress at Waitangi in the Autumn of each year, for The Purpose of Framing Laws for the dispensation of Justice, The Preservation of Peace and Good Order, and the Regulation of Trade, and they cordially invite the Southern Tribes to lay aside their private animosities and to consult the safety and welfare of our Common Country, by joining The Confederation of United Tribes o Aotearoa. 4. They also Agree to Send a Copy of this Declaration to His Majesty King William IV of England, to thank Him for His Acknowledgment of their Flag; and in Return for the Friendship and Protection they have shown, and are prepared to show, to such of His Subjects as have Settled in their Country, or Resorted to its shores for the Purposes of Trade, they Entreat that He will Continue to be the Parent of their Infant State, and that He Will Become Its Protector from All Attempts Upon Its Independence Agreed to unanimously on this 28th day of Octobers 1835, in the presence of His Britannic Majestys Resident. As a Mokopuna of The Confederation of United Tribes o Aotearoa, being part of the unextinguished Native Title, I Kevin-(Wayne-Bluegum:) his Whanau, heirs and successors, doth re-affirm articles 1 to 4 of He Whakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Aotearoa 1835 which states: Native/Aboriginal Title (Non Territorial) Te Tiriti O Waitangi (6th February 1840) MAORI TO ENGLISH TRANSLATION, INTERPRETATION AND LEGAL UNDERSTANDING [Preamble] Victoria I, the Queen of England in her concern to Protect the Chiefs and sub Tribes of New Zealand in her desire and to preserve to them their Chieftainship and their Land and to maintain continually also the Peace to them and the quiet living therefore has considered she a right thing to give a Chief
Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 2 of 32
st

[Governor] one who will arrange with the Maori People of New Zealand to reach an agreement between the Chiefs for the Government [Fiducial Duty or Trusteeship] of the Queen to be upon all places of this Land and the Islands because also there are many other people of Her Tribe who live and will live on these Lands, and are still coming here. So the Queen desires to Establish Her Government [Parliament of Westminster & House Of Lords] so that no evil will come to the Maori People from the European living on their [The Maori Chiefs] Land without Laws. So it has pleased the Queen to allow me WILLIAM HOBSON a Captain in the Royal Navy to be Governor for all the Places of New Zealand to be received hereafter to the Queen and so is making with the Chiefs of the Confederation of the SubTribes of New Zealand and other Chiefs these Laws as set out here. [This is] THE FIRST The Chiefs of the Confederation and all the Chiefs also who have not entered that Confederation give also Absolute to the Queen of England for the Government [Parliament of Westminster & House of Lords] all of their land. [Under Fiducial Duties of Trusteeship and the Chiefs of the Tribes and Sub Tribes of New Zealand Exercised their Full Rights, Powers and Privileges under Article II of He Whakaputanga O Te Rangatiratanga O Aotearoa 1835 (NZ).] (Refer to Section 253 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Land Act 1993) [This is] THE SECOND The Queen of England arranges and agrees to give the Chiefs of all Sub Tribes of the Maori People of New Zealand the Unqualified Exercise of their Chieftainship over their Lands, their Villages, and over all other Treasures [Native Aboriginal Title = He Taonga Tuku Iho]. But on the other hand the Chiefs of the Confederation and the Chiefs of the sub Tribes of New Zealand all give to the Queen the Sale and Purchase of those Lands [as] is Willing [to sell] the person owning the land for the price agreed between them [viz The Tribes, Sub Tribes in accordance with Tikanga Maori Customary Ownership Tenure]. And the purchaser Appointed by the Queen [The Governor] as an agent Purchase for Her. [Notwithstanding any Enactment of Statue nor Regulation made by the Settlers & Immigrants Parliament (NZ) in contravention with this Provision Shall be of any force or effect nor to be Construed as to have Extinguished the Native Aboriginal Title of any part or Parts of New Zealand.]

[This is] THE THIRD For the Arrangement therefore and for the Agreement concerning the Government of the Queen All the Maori People of New Zealand will be Protected by the Queen of England and will give to them All the Rights and Duties All in Equal Measurer that apply under Her Constitution to the People of England. [Equals; the Rights and Duties to the Establishment of; Te Paramata Tino Rangatiratanga O Aotearoa or The Upper House or Crown & Maori Legislative Privy Council (NZ)] (Refer Preamble, Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, Part XIII, Sections 247, 250, 252, 253, 253A, 270, 271 & 284/93 and Section 268(3) of Section 17 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Amendment Act 1994 and The Maori Incorporation Constitution Regulations Act 1995 = any provision of the Act of Regulation may be altered, Added to or Replaced] So we the Chiefs of the Confederation and the Chiefs of the Sub Tribes of New Zealand meeting here at Waitangi are therefore the Chiefs of New Zealand having seen the shape of the words being accepted and agreed all by us, thus recorded our names and Marks. Done at Waitangi on the Sixth day of the Days of February in the year of One Thousand, Eight Hundred and forty of Our Lord. Full Execution of Prerogative Powers;
Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 3 of 32
st

NOW THEREFORE; I Kevin- (Wayne-Bluegum:) My, Whanau heirs and successors, Mokopuna Tangata Whenua, O Aotearoa; and do hereby reaffirm he Whakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Nga Hapu O Aotearoa 1835 and Te Tiriti O Waitangi 1840 and the special relationship between Rangatiratanga O Aotearoa and Kawanatanga of the United Kingdom and declare by proclamation of the prerogative power of the sovereign in Right of the Dominion/State O Aotearoa (NZ) to the establishment of a constitution, of a Maori Upper and Lower House Government and Institutions O Aotearoa (NZ), upon all lands and property rights un- extinguished of the Native Aboriginal Title; and I declare, he Mokopuna Tangata Whenua Internal Lawful Sovereign in Right of the Dominion/State of Aotearoa, with Claim of full Rights (taonga tuku Iho), and my imported Christian name/s or otherwise known as; Kevin Bluegum; and I descend from The Hapu; and Whanau o: Bluegum; and I Declare that the Constructive Trust see (Blacks Law 8th Edition) established to represent my Fictitious Person and
Ref 1: (Blacks Law, 8th Edition) Fictitious Person see Artificial Person An entity, such as a corporation, created by law and given certain legal rights and duties of a human being; a being, real or imaginary, who for the purpose of legal reasoning is treated more or less as a human being Ref 2: (Blacks Law, 8th Edition) Legal Fiction The Constructive Trust is an example of a legal fiction also termed [fiction of law] and An assumption that something is true even though it may be untrue, made esp. In judicial reasoning to alter how a legal rule operates; specifically. A device by which a legal rule or institution is diverted from its original purpose to accomplish indirectly some other object.

Christian Trade Names


IHO / JEHOVAH / GOD

Family Trade Name


MATUA-KORE / IHOA O NGA MANO

Birth Date of:


TIMATANGA O NGA MEA KATOA

RANGINUI / SPIRIT PAPATUANUKU / PHYSICAL

Ka puta mai Ira Atua

TANE / TANGAROA / TAWHITIMATEA / RONGO MA (70 Sons) HINE-AHU-ONE HINE-TITAMA Ka puta mai Ira Tangata

Kevin Wayne Debbie Anne Hinekura Rama George Tutanekai Valarie Maree [nee Bluegum] Roma Cameron Shannon Marie Keremeta Debbie Anne Hinekura Norman Gilbert

Bluegum Bluegum Puru - kamu Uilou Bluegum Bluegum Bluegum Bluegum Bluegum

16th March 1955 30th June 1959 6th June 1980 th 13 July 1979 10th March 1981 14th April 1973 10th September 1973 13th August 1987 14th May 1995

......................................................................................................................................
Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 4 of 32
st

I Kevin (Wayne Bluegum:) My, Whanau, heirs and successors am the natural living breathing soul, and man with the Highest Claim as of Birth Right, recorded with as titled above, as a preferred, primary and secured natural Creditor Claimant to the Constructive Trusts (fictitious persons); Whereas being the Secured Party Creditor / Claimant of my Birth Certificate Trade Names and birth certificate trade names of all my Whanau, Tamariki, and Whangai doth declare by proclamation of the prerogative power of the sovereign in Right of the Dominion/State O Aotearoa (NZ) to the establishment of Intellectual Property Rights and Common Law Copyrights in accordance with He Whakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Aotearoa 1835 and Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840; and This Commercial Claim of Rights Affidavit is issued to the Constructive Trusts below, under necessity and manifests immediate need for relief and remedy, by said Constructive Trusts to furnish their Commercial Liability Surety Bonds; and Our land is occupied by unlawful foreign military, armed and unarmed forces through unlawful foreign bar agents as members of any bar associations doing business as:
Constructive Trusts (with their bar agents acting as trustees of record) named as but not limited to: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND, Her Majesty, Sovereign Lady the Queen; The Crown, THE CROWN, CROWN, Crown service under the New Zealand Government, THE NEW ZEALAND GOVERNMENT, NZ GOVT, THE STATE OF NEW ZEALAND, THE STATE REALM OF NEW ZEALAND, NEW ZEALAND, NZ, New Zealand, THE NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY, NEW ZEALAND BAR ASSOCIATION, NEW ZEALAND POLICE, New Zealand Parliament, NZ PARLIAMENT, Parliament of New Zealand, the General Assembly, General Assembly of New Zealand in Parliament, all typographical manifestations, all derivatives there of and all related Constructive Trusts such as the responsible Prime Minister along with the heads of Government Offices also responsible being the Ministers of Parliament and their Agents, Heirs, and Successors, otherwise know as public/civil servants that have all sworn the So help me God oath of allegiance to the Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and including our lawfully given Names and Surnames that are being criminally converted to Constructive Trusts, causing the people to become Citizens for the Constructive Trusts Financial Security, in the process creating statutes of obligations, further committing the Citizens under duress, to the unlawful foreign bar agents known as THE JUDICIARY, who translate statutes into unlawful Public Performance, with the NEW ZEALAND POLICE, enforcing the unlawful Public Performance, without the peoples knowledge, understanding nor consent. Also any interpretation implied status, obligation or standing, of the Wellington Yacht Club Flag, otherwise illegally presumed to be known as The New Zealand Flag being all blue in colour with an ensign of the British Flag of England in the top corner closet to the flag support and having the four stars of the southern cross distributed in the middle of the blue section of the flag, only represents the Constructive Trust and not this land, Declared to be an Independent State 1835, under the designation of The Confederation of United Tribes o Aotearoa Fictitious municipal statutes, ordinance and corporate laws allow for charges without an actual injured party and thereby fail to state a claim on which relief can be granted. As there is no lawful joinder, contract or signed agreement between the living breathing soul and the Constructive Trust in the Name of the Birth Certificate, then we are all freemen, however, only by presumption of joinder are we bound to the fictitious municipal statutes, ordinance and corporate laws. Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21st Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Tino
Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 5 of 32

Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right: Section 2


Claimant Declaration Relevant Laws Claim of Right Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993/95; and Imperial Laws Application Act 1998; and The Indigenous Peoples Declaration of Rights Act 2007 and Treason Act 1751; and Crimes Act 1961 S2: Interpretations [Claim of Right , in relation to any act, means a belief that the act is lawful, although that belief may be based on ignorance or mistake of fact or of any matter of law other than the enactment against which the offence is alleged to have been committed]

I Kevin (Wayne Bluegum:) My Whanau, heirs and successors claim full rights of all Tangata Whenua customary practices, values and usages, in accordance with sections 3 and 253 in The Exercise of Full Capacities, Rights, Powers, and Privileges of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993/95, and section 5: This Act SHALL bind the Crown, and section 248(1)(c) - Any other assets, being the property of the owners of the land, and including the value of those assets, are to be vested in Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc.); and Amalgamated Maori Incorporation, for and on behalf of the Beneficiaries / Shareholders and, doth Furthermore, claim the rights available under section 53: Defence of movable taonga/property with claim of right, NZ Crimes Act 1961; and

Whereas being a Mokopuna of The Confederation of United Tribes o Aotearoa, and having a duty, and an obligation in the protection, of the subjects of the British Crown, implemented, enforced and guaranteed by our ancestors, in the signing of the antecedent Documents of Aotearoa / Nu Tireni [NZ]: He Whakaputanga O Te Rangatiratanga O Aotearoa (28th October 1835) and Te Tiriti
O Waitangi (6th February 1840) Not to be suggested as, or implied it is or construed it to be, (The TREATY OF WAITANGI) implemented and signed at Port Waikato after 3rd Proclamation of the assumed Discovery of the South Island and assumed cession of the North Island 21st May 1840, which brought and established all People living on the soil of the Dominion of Aotearoa as a

Citizen(s) of New South Wales, unlawfully docked in Wellington and therefore the responsibility for all living on the soil of the Dominion of Aotearoa; and
I Kevin (Wayne Bluegum:) for and on behalf of: My Whanau, heirs and successors, for the

purposes of trade, Do hereby appoint Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc.); and herein now our (Successor), and hereinafter the Secured Party, for and on behalf of all amalgamated Maori Incorporations and for and on behalf of all Beneficiaries / Shareholders; and having full capacity in the discharge of the obligations of the trust, for and in the best interests of the Shareholders and Beneficiaries, and to carry on or undertake any business or activity, do any act or enter in to any transactions and having full rights, powers and privileges; and

Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 6 of 32

st

Security Interests; 1.1 Whereas Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc.) being Successor and now the Secured Party Creditor of my birth certificate and Legal Trade Names; and the birth certificates and Legal Trade Names of my / our Whanau, Tamariki, Whangai; and Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) and amalgamated Maori Incorporations, for and on behalf of all beneficiaries, shareholders and all future Generations, hereinafter We / our / us I / We claim full rights, powers and legal privileges to trade openly as gifted to citizens within a society without obligation of membership; and Whereas I / We claim full rights, powers, entitlements and all legal privileges to engage into, or to carry on or undertake an business or activity, do any act, or enter into any transaction; in order to receive recourse and remedy for settlement and closure, of this Commercial Claim of Rights Affidavit security instrument and including all other Commercial Claims of Rights Affidavit Security Instruments served by Registered Postal Mail or substitute service, by Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) and Amalgamated Maori Incorporations, for and on behalf of the Beneficiaries/Shareholders; do now formally direct and caution without prejudice or ill will; all officers of the courts, magistrates, registrars, presiding Justices, and all court departments; are now hereby put on Judicial Notice, and this shall be noted as admissible and sufficient evidence of the facts so certified, upon a civil or criminal prosecution against you, if directly or indirectly involved in any breach of trust, all shall be liable for injuries and continual injuries by failure of due process of law, Breach of contract, Breach of Office and/or Allegiance Oath, statutory obligation, inability, misbehaviour, dishonesty and contempt of court, regarding this Commercial Claim of Rights Affidavit security instrument and including all other Commercial Claims of Rights Affidavit Security Instruments served by Registered Postal Mail or substitute service, by Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc.) and Amalgamated Maori Incorporations, for and on behalf of the Beneficiaries/Shareholders; and lastly, to all public servants/subjects, police officers, all third party interloper(s) being prosecutor(s), defence counsel(s), presiding member(s) and officers mentioned within this Commercial Claim of Rights Affidavit security instrument; and the abovementioned Commercial Claim of Rights Affidavit security instruments for and on behalf of the Beneficiaries and Shareholders; do further claim, the fact that an offender is ignorant of the law is not an excuse for any offence committed by him, and failure to honour this offer shall be deemed (to mean) you agree by express tacit agreement to the facts herein contained and have waived all your rights to a Notice of Protest, all judicial immunities and recourse doth hereby consent to this Claim as Legal Tender (as accepted in the principles and rules of equity), and to a charge of treason, an immediate Administrative Judgment and immediate dismissal from office; and Whereas I / We Claim the right to engage in any action, in order to receive recourse and remedy for settlement and closure, of this Claim of Right and aforementioned Claim of Rights. SHALL be Legal Tender and my Personal Commercial Liability Property Security Interest Bond Instrument, up to the value of One Hundred Million New Zealand Dollars ($100,000,000.00) per unauthorised use of trade name(s), and Ten Million New Zealand Dollars ($10,000,000.00) per injury; effective immediately upon civil or criminal prosecution; where the individual, CORPORATION, Natural Person, PERSON, Persons or living breathing soul has breached and violated this Claim or Rights commercial security instrument; ALL SHALL BE LIABLE for crimes committed, under the laws of this land, and charged accordingly with treason and so forth, in accordance with the Summary Proceedings Act 1957, NZ Crimes Act 1961, Imperial Laws Application Act 1988, Treason Act 1751(UK) and Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993/95; and Whereas I / We Claim full rights, powers, entitlements and all legal privileges to engage into, or to carry on or undertake any business or activity, do any act or enter into any transaction; in order to receive recourse and remedy for settlement and closure, of this Claim of Right, for the
st

1.2

1.3

1.4

Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 7 of 32

above mentioned security interests and fee schedules within this said Claim and including the Claims, security interests and fee schedules of Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) and Amalgamated Maori Incorporations for and on behalf of all Beneficiaries/Shareholders; SHALL be activated and deposited forthwith as an insurance commercial liability bond into , Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc.), Kaitiaki Putea Trust ANZ BANK account, number: 010298-0058810-01; or by cheque payment or Gold Bullion payable to said claimant, his Whanau, heirs and successors, effective immediately within any said injuries mentioned above, or upon civil or criminal prosecution for treason and breaches of this said Claim of Right and SHALL be enforceable and binding upon all of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II subjects, (a.k.a.) civil/public servants, all Ministers, all Judges, all Departments of Courts and all New Zealand Company Departments; and 1.5 Whereas I / We claim full rights, powers, entitlements and all legal privileges to engage into, or to carry on or undertake any business or activity, do any act, or enter into any transaction; in order to receive recourse and remedy for settlement and closure, of this Claim of Rights commercial security instrument; and whereas this document and its contents SHALL have the Full Power of the law behind it, and this SHALL be an agreement as admissible and binding upon ALL Government departments, NZ Courts, presiding members, defence counsels, and all prosecutors as third party defendants and default fiduciary, as having been established, acceptable and sufficient evidence of the facts so certified, within the terms and provisions of the Evidence Act 1908 and SHALL be deemed as Prima Facie evidence; upon ALL European Courts within and outside of New Zealand and the New Zealand Settlers and Immigrants Parliament; and Whereas I / We claim full rights, powers and privileges to receive recourse and remedy for settlement and closure, Requested in the form of Legal Tender Fiat Money, or cheque(s) payment, or Credit Cards, or Diamonds, or all forms of Legal Tender to be converted into Gold Bullion as defined by Law (single gold exchange standard), and caution, failure to pay may result in bankruptcy; and

1.6

Jurisdiction; 2.1 Whereas it is my / our understanding, Aotearoa / New Zealand is a common law jurisdiction which also enforces the common laws of England (including the principles and rules of equity) and this shall continue to be part of the laws of New Zealand; and Whereas it is my / our understanding, equality before the law is paramount and mandatory; and Whereas it is my / our understanding, no one is above the Laws of the Land and that All New Zealand Courts have no original jurisdiction on the land; and Whereas it is my / our understanding, a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law; and
1 [3] Claim of Right When a person asserts a claim of right to property in the possession of another and seeks to reclaim such property, the possessor is not justified in using force to thwart the dispossession if he knows, believes, or as a reasonable person should believe, that the claimant has a legitimate claim of right to possession of the property in question. Since the use of force to protect property is legitimate only if the act/attempted act of dispossession is unlawful, in such cases of a legitimate claim to property, the act of dispossession is lawful.

2.2 2.3 2.4

Governance by Consent and Representation; 3.1 3.2 Whereas it is my / our understanding, a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal; and Whereas it is my / our understanding, there are two forms of government, recognised as lawful in Aotearoa: (the Internal Sovereign Heads and Mokopuna in right of New Zealand 1835)
st

Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 8 of 32

and Whangai in accordance to Tikanga; and [the Ministers, Agents and all accommodation party; Representations of The State Realm of NZ] is a representative government, for and on behalf of internal and external foreign offshore Corporations; and 3.3 Whereas it is my / our understanding, representation requires mutual consent and in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist; and

Statute Laws; 4.1 Whereas it is my / our understanding, all Courts are subservient to all Acts of Parliament and therefore all Presiding Judges, magistrates, Justices of the Peace, court registrars, and officers of the Court shall not put themselves outside the laws of Parliament and continue to commit acts of fraud upon ALL HONOURABLE COURTS and thus SHALL be bound by those Acts; and Whereas it is my / our understanding, all Acts are statutes restricted in scope and applicability by the New Zealand Constitution Act 1986 which is limited to members and employees of the government; and Whereas it is my / our understanding, the 1986 New Zealand Constitution Act passed by the Labour Government, has no power to remove any statutory law passed by another Government (i.e.; New Zealand Constitution Act 1852, legislated through Letters Patent, issued under The Great Seal of the
United Kingdom, passed first into English Law, then becoming legally enforceable in NZ Law by the Westminster Parliament-British Crown). Where those Acts may not seem to exist in New Zealand Law, and that

4.2

4.3

is debateable, they (i.e. 1751 Treason Act, Statute of Westminster Act 1931) still exist in British Imperial Laws and are still legally binding on New Zealand; and 4.4 Whereas it is my / our understanding, all New Zealand Acts are statutes restricted in scope and applicable ONLY to the Crown (NZ); and

Government Departments and Services; 5.1 Whereas it is my / our understanding, those who have a Social Security, WINZ, Social Development, or Inland Revenue number are in fact employees of the NZ government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the NZ government; and Whereas it is my / our understanding, that it is lawful to abandon ones Social Security, WINZ, Social Development, or Inland Revenue number; and

5.2

Right to Revoke or Deny Consent to be Governed; 6.1 6.2 6.3 Whereas it is my / our understanding, people in Aotearoa/NZ have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed; and Whereas it is my / our understanding, if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints; and Whereas a Tangata Whenua Lawful Sovereign has lawfully revoked consent he / she exists free of New Zealand statutory restrictions, obligations and limitations; and

General Jurisdiction; 7.1 7.2 Whereas it is my / our understanding, that acting peacefully within community standards does not breach the peace; and Whereas I am a Tangata Whenua Lawful Sovereign, and as We are amalgamated Maori Incorporations, Whangai; Beneficiaries and Shareholders, who operates with full responsibility
st

Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 9 of 32

and not as a child or children, I / We do not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability; and Central and Local Governments and Local Authorities; 7.3 7.4 7.5 Whereas it is my / our understanding, a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation; and Whereas it is my / our understanding, corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties; and Whereas it is my / our understanding, legal fictions lack a soul and can not exert any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones actions; and

Legal and Equitable Rights of Ownership, Control and Use of Property; 8.1 8.2 8.3 Whereas it is my / our understanding, that I have a right to use my property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it; and Whereas it is my / our understanding, that transporting myself and my property,, by travelling the highways and byways is an inalienable right protected by common law; and Whereas it is my / our understanding, that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license must, itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and, that if I do not have documents of use of my property I am not breaking the law; and Whereas it is my / our understanding, that when an individual or more is detained, without warrant and without having committed a crime, the DETENTION IS A FALSE ARREST and FALSE IMPRISONMENT; and Whereas it is my / our understanding, that preventing me from the peaceful possession, use and enjoyment of my property is a punishable offence; and

8.4

8.5

Rights to Use Public Infrastructures and Services; 9.1 9.2 Whereas it is my / our understanding, that public transport is in fact public property to which I / We have the right of use and access to; and Whereas I / We, claim the right to collect a pension if I / We have paid into it and claim that said right is not affected if I abandon my Social Security, WINZ, Social Development or Inland Revenue number; and Whereas it is my / our understanding, that ignorance of the statutes is no excuse and that all officers of the courts, all police and all other governmental department servants have a moral and Statutory obligation and duty to distinguish between statutes and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against all Tangata Whenua Lawful Sovereigns, and Whangai, are in fact breaking the law; and Whereas I / We have Full Power to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have not observed me / us breach the peace; and Whereas permanent estoppels by acquiescence barring any peace officer(s), defence Counsel(s) or prosecutor(s) from bringing charges against Tangata Whenua Lawful Sovereigns, and Whangai, do hereby state clearly specifically and unequivocally my / our intent to peacefully
st

9.3

9.4 9.5

Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 10 of 32

and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations restrictions and maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter; and 9.6 Furthermore, I / We claim that these actions are not outside my / our communities standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for truth, justice and maximum freedom; and Furthermore, I / We claim Full Rights to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held by the claimant his heirs, successors and Whangai, is held under claim of rights as mentioned in the Crimes Act 1961, and Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993/95 and Criminal Codes of Aotearoa/New Zealand and The Indigenous Peoples Declaration of Rights 2007; and Furthermore, I / We claim Full Power of the 1751 Treason Act Crimes Act 1961 section 73: Treason Every one owing allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Maori Trustee and External Sovereign of Right to New Zealand and Protector of the Internal Sovereign Heads and Mokopuna in right of New Zealand 1835 and Whangai in accordance to Tikanga, commits treason who, within or outside New Zealand, (a) (b) (c) Kills or wounds or does grievous bodily harm to Her Majesty the Queen, or imprisons or restrains her; or Levies war against The Confederation of United Tribes o Aotearoa 1835(NZ); Assists an enemy, (in this instance being the NZ settlers and immigrants police who are not a legal entity, with no conferment of authority) at war with The Confederation of United Tribes o Aotearoa 1835(NZ), or any armed forces against which New Zealand forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between New Zealand and any other country; or Incites or assists any person with force to invade New Zealand; or Uses force for the purpose of overthrowing The Confederation of United Tribes o Aotearoa 1835(NZ); and, ALL HER Majesty Queen Elizabeth II Laws, or Conspires with any person to do anything mentioned in this section; and Section 74: Everyone is liable to 14yrs imprisonment or death by execution; and Section 408: This Act shall bind the Crown, and

9.7

9.8

(d) (e) (f)

9.9

I / We, further claim Full Powers, Rights and Privileges of an extract in the Police Review Act October 2006; that the legal status of police might be expected to be formally recognisable in Legislation, however contrary to the rules of law, the organisation that exist today as New Zealand Police can be traced back to the Police Force Act 1886 (and, before that, the armed constabularies of the 1840s), but neither the 1886 Act or 1958 Police Act contains a provision formally establishing it as a legal entity; and I / We, further claim Full Powers, Rights and Privileges of an extract in the Police Review Act October 2006; that it is sometimes assumed police powers principally derive from the oath of office, constables take when they join police (section 37 of the 1958 Police Act), however, from a legal perspective, it is fairly well-settled that the constabulary oath does not provide an independent source of any particular police power; and I further claim Full Powers without prejudice of an extract of Justice Hardie-Boys comments in Court of Appeal case of R v Jefferies [1994 1 NZLR 290, 313: Quote In our constitutional model, police powers are conferred expressly and specifically. There is no conferment of general authority. A police officer stands in no different position from any other citizen unquote; and

9.10

9.11

Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 11 of 32

st

9.12

Furthermore, I / We claim Full Powers, Rights and Privileges that at present, there is NO specific authority for the use of handcuffs by police officers. As Chief Justice Elias recorded in Wallace v Abbott (2002) 19 CRNZ 585, Quote Handcuffing someone is clearly a use of force, police in New Zealand do not have any general authorisation to use force unquote; and Furthermore, I / We claim Full Power of the Evidence Act 1908: section 27: Judicial notice of official seals, etc. Where by any Act any seal or stamp is authorised to be used by any Court, officer, body corporate, or any other person, judicial notice shall be taken of the impression of such seal or stamp without evidence of the same having been impressed or any other evidence relating thereto. Section 28: Judicial notice of Acts of Parliament Judicial notice shall be taken by all Courts and persons acting judicially of all Acts of Parliament; and Furthermore, I / We claim Full Power of the District Courts Act 1947 Section 7: Tenure of office (1) The Governor General may, remove a [Judge] for inability or misbehaviour, also in reference to section 12 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993/95; and Furthermore, I / We claim Full Power of the Imperial Laws Application Act 1988 Section 5: Application of Common Law of England After the commencement of this Act, the common law of the United Kingdom (including the principles and rules of equity), so far as it was part of the laws of New Zealand immediately before the commencement of this Act, shall continue to be part of the laws of New Zealand. The reference behind this was the Privy Council decision in 1947 concerning the Statutes of Westminster Adoption Act; and Furthermore, I / We claim that a fundamental principle of the common law of England (including the principles and rules of equity) states, when you appear before a court in Britain, you appear as a citizen equal to any other and should be treated equally; and Furthermore, I / We claim Full Power of the Declaratory Judgments Act 1908 Section 12: Decisions of the Court of Appeal to bind all other Courts Subject to any decision of the Privy Council, any decision of the Court of Appeal under this Act shall be binding as precedent in ALL other Courts in New Zealand; and Furthermore, I / We claim Full Power of the decision in 1901 in judgement of the Privy Council where Lord Phillimore was presiding, he stated in his decision in the case, Heneti Rirerire Arani versus the public trustee of New Zealand; quote, he stated that, Maori customary law enjoys legal status in European Colonial courts in New Zealand, in the absence of any statute indicating otherwise, that statute being enacted by the Native inhabitants themselves unquote; and Furthermore, I / We claim Full Power of the judgement of the Privy Council where Lord Davey in 1900 1901, made a decision in Nireaha Tamaki versus Baker, and in the United States, Johnstone versus MacIntosh, where the Crown refused, in fact they were devoid actually, they refused to accept, that the issue of a Crown grant amounted to this extinguishment of the Native title. He stated quote, that numerous statutes in the common law which are referring to the Native Title or such like, of tenure of land under custom and usage which was either known to lawyers or discoverable by them by evidence. The Native Title being: all the rights, powers and privileges existing prior to the Treaty of Waitangi 1840, unquote and Furthermore, I / We claim Full Power of the judgement of Willis vs. the Attorney General, where the New Zealand Settlers Government issued a Crown grant to the Bishop of Wellington
st

9.13

9.14

9.15

9.16

9.17

9.18

9.19

9.20

Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 12 of 32

and was held in the High Court of Appeal that the Crown grant gave the Bishop of Wellington full title to the land, and The appeal went to the Privy Council via Willis vs. the Attorney General. Presiding on the Privy Council was Lord McNaughten who stated we will have none of that. The Court was not an instrument of executive dictate, it was up to the Court to determine what a breach of trust was, and Lord McNaughten squashed the Crown grant issued to the Bishop of Wellington because it was insufficient of Regal discretion. Reason being, because the Crown had not purchased one inch of soil in New Zealand and I / We state in italic by way of first right of pre-emption and the first right of refusal; and Now when that decision went to the Privy Council Lord McNaughten stated that it was rather late in the day for the NZ Colonial Bench to deny the Native Title legal status, and So in 1947 the New Zealand Settlers Government adopted the Statutes of Westminster Act 1931 which gave them Full Power to make laws for themselves. But section 8 of the Statute of Westminster Act 1931 states this quote Nothing in this Act shall give any power to repeal the 1852 Constitution Act of the Colony of New Zealand unquote; and Furthermore, I / We claim Full Power of a quote from Hohepa Mapiria Murphy, Again years go by, in 1986 the NZ Settlers Parliament breaches the Statutes of Westminster Adoption Act 1947 and repealed the NZ Constitution Act 1852 and on repealing the Constitution Act of New Zealand they gave it FULL POWER and chopped off their own neck, because by the Constitution Act 1852 it was by that statute that they obtained from the British Crown a Warrant to Govern themselves and they gave themselves FULL POWERS to chop off their own heads by repealing the NZ Constitution Act 1852. New Zealand now stands in legal limbo. The New Zealand Settlers Parliament/Crown has no legal or lawful constitution, therefore no legal power to Govern Pakeha People either unquote; and Furthermore, I / We claim Full Power of the decision in the judgement of the Privy Council where Lord Davey in 1900 1901, made a decision in Nihara Tamaki versus Baker, where he further states, that the lawyers in New Zealand were just to plum lazy to look in the statutes, he defined that the Native title had not been extinguished. Once it reached that point, the Privy Council heard it, and under investigation, they found that the Crown had not purchased one inch of land in New Zealand. That is what they found and therefore, the Crown lacked unreviewable prerogative power in relation to the Native Title. That shook the NZ Settlers parliament, then they changed their voting system and they went on the populist sovereignty model because they owned no land. No land, No Kingdom, No Sovereignty; and Furthermore, I / We claim Full Power of Joseph Hohepa Mapiria Murphys quote, Maori have never at any time lost their land, it is being illegally occupied the present New Zealand Government as has every Government before lied to its own people in the biggest confidence trick in world history unquote; and once Pakeha and others are fully aware of this illusion, their backlash could be something never ever experienced before, especially the Lawsuits, and Furthermore, I / We claim Full Power of The New Zealand Constitution Act 1846 (UK) [9 AND 10 Vic. C. 103, Section 10] On the British Crowns Royal Charter, in cases arising between the Aboriginal Inhabitants of New Zealand alone The Courts and Magistrates of the same ProvinceShall uphold Maori customary Laws and Usages as foresaid; and Furthermore, I / We claim Full Power of the New Zealand Constitution Act 1852 of the Imperial Parliament of the United Kingdom, duly being of constitutional significance, and to specify the extent to which Imperial enactments, Imperial subordinate legislation, and the
st

9.21

9.22

9.23

9.24

9.25

Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 13 of 32

common law of England are part of the laws of New Zealand, in accordance with The Imperial Laws Application Act 1988: Section 5 and 6; and 9.26 Furthermore, I / We claim Full Power of a press statement to the New Zealand Herald 31st May 1997 by the Minister of Justice, Courts and Treaty Negotiations R Hon Douglas Graham of the Settlers and Immigrants Parliament of New Zealand stated that: quote Maori Lore/Laws is separate, and the sooner people realise there are Laws for One, and Lore/Laws for another, the better unquote; and Furthermore, I / We claim Full Power of the 28 MARCH 2001 COMMENTS BY JUDGE DAVID BARAGWANATH Comments from the President of the Law Commission, Justice David Baragwanath in the New Zealand Herald stated that: quote Tikanga Maori in a broad sense, is the body of rules and values developed by Maori to govern themselves though aimed at the legal system, the report says, New Zealanders must also make a total commitment to the Treaty of Waitangi and Maori values in Law, That commitment must involve a real effort to understand what Tikanga Maori is and its importance to Maori. Justice Baragwanath says those customs and values were, and take them onboard pretty smartly, the same could be said for Lawyers, Policy Makers and Parliamentarians unquote (NZ Herald 28 March 2001); and I / We, further claim Full Powers, Rights and Privileges of an extract o the 19-6-2003 Judgement of Presiding Members Elias CJ, Gault P, Keith J, Tipping J, and Anderson J, in the Court of Appeal of New Zealand CA173/01 CA75/02 in Ngati Apa & Others v- Attorney General & Others states that: quote [22] In Tamihana Korokai v- Solicitor-General (1912) 32 NZLR321 This court REJECTED an argument that Native Title was not recognised in Law unquote, and it further states that: quote Cooper J at 352-353, after pointing to the definition of Crown Lands in the Land Act which excluded Customary Lands, concluded,
Customary Lands owned by Natives, which have not been ceded to His Majesty King William IV or acquired from the Native Owners on behalf of His Majesty cannot, in my opinion, be said to be land vested in His Majesty by right of his Prerogative. It is true that, technically, the Legal Estate is in His Majesty, but this Legal Estate is held SUBJECT to the Rights of the Natives, recognised by the Crown, to the Possession and Ownership of the Customary Lands which they have not ceded to the King, and which His Majesty has not acquired from them: unquote; and

9.27

9.28

[140] To repeat, that recognition and guarantee in a treaty of cession of sovereignty, to adopt that Tribunals characterisation of the Treaty of Waitangi 1840, of existing proprietary rights confirmed with extensive law and practice of the time. New Zealand legislation, from the outset, also recognised and provided for the protection of rights of land confirmed and guaranteed by the Crown in Article II or Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840, as the Privy Council said in Nireaha Tamaki v- Baker (1901) NZPCC 371, 373. In addition to doing that, the Land Claim Ordinances (Sess 1, No 2) of 9 June 1841 Declared unappropriated lands to be Crown lands or Domain lands reflecting the Crowns dominium or domain rather than its Imperium or Empire, the latter in general being a matter between States which in the normal course does not require regulation through national law: 2. And whereas it is expedient to remove certain doubts which have arisen in respect of titles of the land in New Zealand, be it therefore declared enacted or ordained, That all unappropriated lands with the said colony of New Zealand, subject however to the rightful and necessary occupation and use thereof by the aboriginal inhabitants of the said colony, are and remain Crown or Domain lands of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, her heirs and successors, and that the sole and absolute right of pre-emption from the said colony of New Zealand which are held or claimed by virtue of purchases or pretended purchases, gifts or pretended gifts, conveyances or pretended conveyances, leases or pretended leases, agreements or other titles, either mediately or immediately from the Chiefs or other
Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 14 of 32
st

individuals or individual of the aboriginal tribes inhabiting the said colony, and which are not or may not hereafter be allowed by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, her heirs and successors, are and the same SHALL BE ABSOLUTELY NULL and VOID: Provided and it is hereby declared that nothing in this Ordinance contained is intended to or shall affect the Title to any Land in New Zealand already purchased from Her Majestys Government [Parliament of Westminster & House of Lords], or which is now held under Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, her heirs and successors unquote; and 9.29 Furthermore, I / We claim Full Powers, Rights and Privileges; that Law is established for the benefit of man, and In all affairs, and principally in those which concern the administration of justice, the rules of equity ought to be followed, and It is inequitable to permit some to trade, and to prohibit others, and a Judge ought always to have equity before his eyes, and Violence may also put on the mask of Law, and once fraudulent, always fraudulent and A CONCEALED FAULT IS EQUAL TO DECEIT, therefore Let the punishment be proportioned to the seriousness of the crime(s), and delays in law are odious, and he who may consent tacitly, may consent expressly and where equality is equity, and where equity suffers not a right without remedy, and an error not resisted is approved, and to be false in one thing, is to be false in everything and it is a fraud to conceal a fraud and that, to be able to know (the law), is the same as to know (the law) and Ignorance of fact may excuse, but not ignorance of Law, and in a fiction of law, equity always subsist; and Furthermore, I / We claim Full Powers, Rights and Privileges; that in all obligations when no time is fixed for payment, the thing is due immediately, and a part is included in the whole, and the nature of law is unchangeable, and whereas, Right and Fraud never go together and he who ratifies a bad action, is considered as ordered it, and Justice is not to be denied nor delayed, and Gross negligence is equal to fraud, and where fictions arise from the law not law from fictions, and it is punishment enough for a judge that he is responsible to IO Jehovah God, and Judgements are as it were, the dicta or the sayings of law, and are received as truth and a Judgement is always taken for truth and the Law is from everlasting, and Law is a rule of right and the law does no fail in showing justice and the law punishes falsehood and the law does not fail in showing justice and the law punishes falsehood and the law dislikes delays and the law always gives a remedy and Gross negligence is a fault, gross fault is a fraud and a mandatory can not exceed the bounds of his authority and unless a mandate is gratuitous it is not a mandate; and Furthermore, I / We claim that anyone who interferes with my and or our lawful activities after having being served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, can not claim good faith, recourse or colour of right and that such transgressions and fraud upon this honourable court will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure; or any District/High Courts, High Court of Appeal or Supreme Court of New Zealand or the Privileged Counsels Court; and Furthermore, I / We claim that the courts in Aotearoa/New Zealand are de-facto and bound by the Contractual Mistakes Act 1977, Contractual Remedies Act 1979, Consumer Guarantees Act 1993, Wages Protection Act 1983 and are in fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests; and I / We, further claim that the Courts require the consent, written and verbal consents of both parties prior to providing any such services and consent is null and void if it was obtained through duress, force, fraud or mistake; and I / We further claim that ALL Public servants SHALL BE LIABLE for crimes committed, in accordance with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 Section 3 Application This Bill of Rights applies only to acts done
st

9.30

9.31

9.32

9.33

9.34

Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 15 of 32

(a) (b) 9.35

By the legislative, executive or judicial branches of the government of New Zealand; or By any person or body in the performance of any public function, power, or duty conferred or imposed on that person or body by or pursuant to law; and

I / We, further claim Full Rights, Powers and Privileges in my / our Official FULL Capacity that the Native Circuit Courts Act 1858 states quote; Every court in NZ is legally required to have a Native Assessor present on the bench whenever a court sits before any decision was or is lawful or legal. This is still law today. However in defiance of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, rights as Sovereign, Her Privy Council and the Commonwealth of the United Kingdoms; all NZ Settlers and Immigrants, the NZ Settlers and Immigrants Parliament and all Government departments have ignored this requirement. This is in effect a treasonable act. Maori have the legal right and entitlement to be represented equally alongside a Magistrate in every court in the land, this is the Queens law unquote; and I / We further claim Full Rights, Powers and Privileges to engage into or to carry on or undertake any business or activity, for any act or enter into any transaction; in order to receive recourse and remedy for settlement and closure regarding any breach of trust, of this Commercial Claim of Rights Affidavit security instrument; in accordance with The Native Districts Regulation Act 1858: No 4, section 2 subsection (7); Noxious Weed; states quote; it is illegal for all European to grow and sell marijuana / noxious weed, but it is not illegal for Maori to grow and sell marijuana / noxious weed unquote; and I / We, further claim Full Powers, Rights and Privileges in my official capacity to print legal tender to be known as Putea; at the international currency exchange rate of a $100 American Dollars for $1 Putea and also, to grow and sell marijuana / noxious weed at the first Marijuana Caf to be known as Mauti Caf, as an instant commercial economical base for Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc.) and amalgamated Maori Incorporations who wish to participate, within any location so desired, in order to establish Mint Printing Warehouses and Marijuana Coffee Cafs of The Confederation of United Tribes o Aotearoa 1835 (NZ); and I / We, further claim full rights, powers and privileges in my / our official capacity to caution all legislative bodies, executive officers, or judicial branches of the government of New Zealand; or any person or body in the performance of any public function, power or duty conferred or imposed on that person or body by or pursuant to law, SHALL be liable for all offences committed upon the land and peoples in any criminal or civil proceedings; in respect of an act or omission by him/her if, at the time of the act, breaches, injuries or omissions, are hereby formally requested to furnish a Commercial Liability Insurance Surety Bond forthwith, as established by law and consistent with the principles of fundamental justice, therefore, Let the punishment be proportioned to the seriousness of the crimes, after having been served and warned of this notice, of pending criminal and civil litigation. Further more; this said Commercial Liabilities Insurance Security Affidavit Trade Bond shall also form part of the Constitution of the Bluegum Whanau, Hapu and Descendants. FEE SCHEDULE Section 3

9.36

9.37

9.38

Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993/95; section 2, 3, 5, 144 (1)(b), 253(a) and Imperial Laws Application Act 1998; section 5, 6 and Crimes Act 1961 S 2 Interpretations 10.1 FEE SCHEDULE
st

Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 16 of 32

MEMO: Punishments and fines for transgressions committed by Persons, Principals and Agents (as defined in s 2 Interpretations, Crimes Act 1961) Against the Claimant or Tangata Whenua Lawful Sovereigns Furthermore, I / we claim the right to include in this Fee Schedule hereinafter all prior and current claims of compensation, damages and all litigation Court(s) costs incurred by the Secured Party and amalgamated Maori Incorporations: lawfully appointed Native Assessors and or of Nga Tikanga Maori Law Society of Te Rangatira O Nga Hapu, O Aotearoa. Furthermore, I / we claim the right to use a Native Assessor / Maori Incorporation Executive Councillor, which is an officer of competent jurisdiction to secure payment of the FEE SCHEDULE, below against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm my interests, do injury to my family, friends our TRADE NAMES, or me the natural living breathing soul directly or by proxy in any way.

Police Fee Schedule; I / we claim as the head of the Whanau (familys) household upon service of this Claim of Rights to all transgressors such as Police Officers, attempting to hijack any vehicle driven by my / our Whanau (family) or myself, or interfering with our travel, and demanding that I or they (Police) stop, questioning, interrogating or in any way detaining Under Duress, my / our Whanau (family) or myself from my or our lawful travel, shall be charged a Fee of ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS per breach of trust and a further fee charge of TEN MILLION DOLLARS per offending officer engaging, after having been warned of this notice, of pending litigation. Police Officer/s shall be deemed to have been served upon citation whether having received or viewed a hard paper copy form or having received a verbal communication to the existence of this Claim or Rights; and Furthermore, for the Trespass into or on my / our Whanau (family) home or land Without Consent, regardless of any Warrants or Court Orders, and upon receipt of this Claim of Rights, to the offending Police Officer(s) responsible for the invading party, a Fee to that Officer(s), shall be charged of TEN MILLION DOLLARS for each Home Invasion Violations and a further fee charge of TEN MILLION DOLLARS per offending officer and animal(s), after having been served and warned of this notice, of pending litigation. All Police Officer(s) shall be deemed to have been served upon citation whether having received or viewed a hard paper copy form or having received a verbal communication to the existence of this Claim of Rights; and Furthermore, for the Theft and Unlawful Use of my or our Whanau (Familys) and My or Our Legal TRADE NAMES, being our copyright property Without Consent and upon service of this Claim of Rights, to Police Officers engaging my / our Whanau (family) and myself in unsolicited commerce, such as issuing Traffic Tickets and other alleged violation notices. Also the use of violence by Police Officers threatening imprisonment in order to extort the Legal Name, is a very serious violation to my Claim or Rights, therefore the charging Fee shall be ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS per notice, for the unauthorised use and theft of my / our Whanau (Familys) Legal TRADE NAMES, being our Common Law copyright property, and a further charging fee of TEN MILLION DOLLARS per offending Police Officer(s), after having been served and warned of this notice, of pending litigation. All Police Officer(s) shall be deemed to have been served upon citation whether having received or viewed a hard paper copy form or having received a verbal communication to the existence of this Claim of Rights; and Furthermore, for my or our Whanau (family(s) and / or myself, should they or I be arrested, and / or handcuffed, and / or transported and / or incarcerated and / or subjected to any adjudication process Under Duress, fraud or force and upon service of this Claim of Rights, to Police Officer(s} carrying out the arrest and / or handcuffing and / or transporting and / or incarcerating and / or subjecting any one of us, to adjudication process is the most serious of violations to my Claim of Rights, therefore the charging Fee shall be ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS and also TEN MILLION DOLLARS per Hour for any further injuries of the unauthorised use of Physical Force on my or our Whanau (family(s) and / or Myself being the Natural Living Breathing Soul, to the offending Police Officer(s), after having been served and warned of this notice, of pending litigation. All Police
Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 17 of 32
st

Officer(s) shall be deemed to have been served upon citation whether having received or viewed a hard paper copy form or having received a verbal communication to the existence of this Claim of Rights; and Furthermore, for if in the event physical violence is inflicted and / or including threats of death upon my or our Whanau (family(s) and / or myself, while in Police Custody, and upon service of this Claim of Rights, to Police Officer(s) inflicting this most disgusting and cowardly violation to my Claim of Rights, the charging Fee shall be ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS per OFFENCE and TEN MILLION DOLLARS per Police Officer and per accomplices for the assault on my or our Whanau (family(s) and / or Myself being the Natural Living Breathing Souls, after having been served and warned of this notice, of pending litigation. Police Officer(s) shall be deemed to have been served upon citation whether having received or viewed a hard paper copy form or having received a verbal communication to the existence of this Claim of Rights; and Inland Revenue Fee Schedule; Furthermore, I / we claim my or our FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressors representing the Inland Revenue Commissioner, or his heirs, successors and agents attempting to correspond with me or us after having been served this Claim of Right then, by using my or our Whanau (family(s) or my or our Legal TRADE NAMES, being our copyright property without explicit consent, is a Fee of ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS per breach of name, whether orally or written and TEN MILLION DOLLARS for further injuries. The signature named at the bottom of the document shall be charged and where there is no signature or author, the charge shall be made to the Commissioner himself. I claim my or our FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressors representing the Inland Revenue Commissioner, or his heirs, successors, and agents attempting to question, interrogate, or force home or office entry for the purpose of searching for documents, or serving documents on myself or our Whanau (family(s) or orally and / or use of my and / or our Whanau (family(s) TRADE NAMES, being my or our copyright property(s) without consent, through assumed joinder between the Natural Living Breathing Soul, and / or Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) as now being the Secured Party Creditor as aforementioned and as declared, is ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS per name and ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS per breach, and TEN MILLION DOLLARS, for further injuries per officer after having been served and warned of this notice, of pending litigation. Now to All offending Offices of the Courts directly or indirectly or by proxy in any way, shall be deemed to have been served upon citation whether having received or viewed a hard paper copy form or having received a verbal communication to the existence of this Claim of Rights; and Courts and Tribunals Fee Schedule; Furthermore, I / we claim my or our FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressors, and all third party interlopers representing ALL District Courts, ALL High Courts, All Courts of Appeals and Supreme Court Registrars Judges and Sheriff(s), their heirs, successors, and agents who attempt to correspond, process, adjudicate, or act on behalf of others, after having been notified of this Claim of Right, Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) being the Secured Party Creditor, of my Birth Certificate Names and or my or our Whanau (family(s), Tamariki (children) and Whangai names, that any unauthorised use of our Legal TRADE NAMES, being our copyright property such as being entered onto documentation without explicit consent, the fee shall be, ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS(NZ) per use of the name upon each piece of document or verbally pronounced for whatever filing, a further fee charge of TEN MILLION DOLLARS per correspondences to all Defence Counsel(s), Prosecutor(s), Defendant(s), Registrar(s) or Judge(s), and all witnesses; and a further fee charge of ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS per breach of Governmental Departments whether directly or indirectly involved, or by proxy in any way. In the case of the documentation being copied by the author of the illegal use of my Name, and or my or our Whanau (family(s), Tamariki (children), and Whangai names and any other breach or injuries, those perpetrators shall be charged at this fee schedule of TEN
Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 18 of 32
st

MILLION DOLLARS for further injuries per officer after having been served and warned of this notice, of pending litigation. Now to All offending Offices of the Courts whether directly or indirectly or by proxy in any way, shall be deemed to have been served upon citation whether having received or viewed a hard paper copy form or having received a verbal communication to the existence of this Claim of Right; and For notification purposes, this notice of trade shall be deemed to have been served when this Declaration of Origin and Ownership of Legal Name and Claim of Right is registered and date stamped in the Court, sent by registered mail or by substitute service to an existing/pending open charge account number. Immigration Fee Schedule; Furthermore, I / we claim my or our FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressors representing the Immigration Department or their heirs, successors and agents attempting to correspond or engage in commerce with my or our Whanau (family(s) household or me, by using my or our Birth Certificate Names and Tamariki, and Whangai names, being my and or our copyright property(s) without explicit consent, through assumed joinder after having been served this Claim of Right then the fee shall be ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS per breach of trust and ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS per breach, and TEN MILLION DOLLARS for further injuries per officer after having been served and warned of this notice, of pending litigation. Now to All offending Offices whether directly or indirectly involved or by proxy in any way, shall be deemed to have been served upon citation whether having received or viewed a hard paper copy form or having received a verbal communication to the existence of this Claim of Rights; and Department of Conservation and Ministry of Fisheries Fee Schedule; Furthermore, I /we claim my or our FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressors representing the Department of Conservation and / or the Ministry of Fisheries or their heirs, successors and agents attempting to correspond or engage in commerce with my or our Whanau (family(s) household(s) or me, by using my Birth Certificate Names, Whanau, (family(s) Tamariki, and or Whangai names, being our copyright property without explicit consent through assumed joinder after having been served this Claim of Right then the fee shall be ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS per breach of trust and ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS per breach and TEN MILLION DOLLARS for further injuries per officer after having been served and warned of this notice, of pending litigation. Now to All offending Offices whether directly or indirectly involved or by proxy in any way, shall be deemed to have been served upon citation, whether having received or viewed a hard paper copy form or having received a verbal communication to the existence of this Claim of Rights; and Department of Child, Youth and Family Services Fee Schedule; Furthermore, I /we claim my or our FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressors representing the Department of Child, Youth and Family Services or their heirs, successors and agents attempting to correspond or engage in commerce with my or our Whanau (family(s) household(s) or me, by using my Birth Certificate Names and or Tamariki and or Whangai names, being my and or our copyright property without explicit consent, through assumed joinder after having been served and warned of this notice, of pending litigation. Now to All offending Offices whether directly or indirectly involved or by proxy in any way, shall be deemed to have been served upon citation whether having received or viewed a hard paper copy form or having received a verbal communication to the existence of this Claim of Rights; and District and or Regional Council Fee Schedule; Furthermore, I / we claim my or our FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressors representing the Council or their heirs, successors and agents attempting to correspond or engage in commerce with my or our
Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 19 of 32
st

Whanau (family(s) household(s) or me, by using our/my Birth Certificate Names, Tamariki and or Whangai names, being our copyright property(s) without explicit consent, through assumed joinder after having been served this Claim of Right then the fee shall be ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS per breach of trust and ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS per breach and TEN MILLION DOLLARS, for further injuries and criminal charges of Statutory and Mandatory obligations not be met per officer after having been served and warned of this notice, of pending litigation. Now to All offending Offices whether directly or indirectly involved or by proxy in any way, shall be deemed to have been served upon citation whether having received or viewed a hard paper copy form or having received a verbal communication to the existence of this Claim of Rights; and Furthermore, I / we claim the right to use a Native Assessor(s), which is an Officer of the Court of competent jurisdiction to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULES against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm my or our Whanau (family(s) household(s) or me, by using my Birth Certificate Names and or Tamariki and or Whangai names, being our TRADE NAMES and or our interests, directly or indirectly or by proxy in any way. Third Party prosecutors/attorneys/presiding members/witnesses/registry; Furthermore, I / we claim my and or our FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressors (in the first instance prosecutor Peter Gorringe & Co, defence attorney Mike Robb & Co, defence attorney PJ Morgan QC & Co, solicitor Liz Gooch & police association, Sheriff Registrar Murray Cross & Co and Justice Thompkins, Cooper J, Randerson J, Pendlington J & Co), and all other Prosecutors, Attorneys, Presiding members, all court officials and witnesses their heirs, successors and agents or by proxy in any way attempting to correspond or engage in commerce with my Whanau (family) household or me, by using my Birth Certificate names and Tamariki names, being our copyright property without explicit consent, through assumed joinder after having been served this Claim of Right then the fee shall be ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS per unauthorised use of trade names and ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS per breach and of TEN MILLION DOLLARS for further injuries per officer after having been served and warned of this notice, of pending litigation. Now to All offending Offices whether directly or indirectly involved or by proxy in any way, shall be deemed to have been served upon citation whether having received or viewed a hard paper copy form or having received a verbal communication to the existence of this Claim of Rights; and (Also refer to private letter/Affidavit (No 1) dated 11-8-2006 and Commercial Affidavit (No 2) dated 31-8-2007 easy track number: No 026 828 125NZ); and (Also refer to private Commercial Instrument(s) /Affidavit(s) served by Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) for and on behalf of all amalgamated Maori Incorporations by Registered Postal Delivery, Substitute Service and Public Notice: Dates, Contract No. and Agents of Foreign Corporate entities I / We, further claim in my / our official capacity as the Chairperson and as the Management, of Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc.) and for and on behalf of amalgamated Maori Incorporations, for and on behalf of all Beneficiaries and Shareholders and having full capacity in the discharge of all obligations of the Trust, in the best interests of the Beneficiaries / Shareholders and having full rights, powers and privileges to do any act, business, or transaction internal or external and do hereby demand immediate payment, for the settlement and closure of all the claims and the breaches of the rights of I /we and or my / our, for and on behalf of the Beneficiaries / Shareholders, committed by external and internal Foreign Agents (Constructive Trust(s), unlawfully trading on the soil of Aotearoa [NZ], since The TREATY OF WAITANGI, Signed at Port Waikato after the third proclamation, and of the assumed discovery, of the South Island and of the assumed cession, of the North Island [Dated: 21st May 1840]; and for and on behalf of external and internal Foreign Agents (Constructive Trust(s), and the agents and or principals and or Principals and or Agents thereof [the New Zealand Government(s) past and present] Whereas at a special Meeting Whanau Hui (Te Whakaminenga, O Te Rangatira, O Nga Hapu, me Nga Tamariki Mokopuna, Me Nga Whangai Hoki O Aotearoa / Nu Tireni [NZ],
Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 20 of 32
st

held at the registered office(s) of The Secured Party, 41 Beach Road KatiKati Bay Of Plenty and dated: (The Constitution of Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc), by special Resolution: moved, seconded Adopted, and accepted; and the Creditors now thereof being the Beneficiaries / Shareholders and or (Te Rangatira O Nga Hapu O Aotearoa [NZ] ); and I / we further claim the unlawful actions of all legislative bodies, executive officers, or judicial branches of the government(s) the past and or the Present or any person or body in the performance of any public function, power or duty conferred or imposed on that person or body by or pursuant to law, SHALL be liable for all offences committed upon the land and peoples in any criminal or civil proceedings; in respect of an act or omission by him/her if, at the time of the act, breaches, injuries or omissions, are hereby formally requested to furnish a Commercial Liability Insurance Surety Bond forthwith, as established by law and consistent with the principles of fundamental justice, therefore, Let the punishment be proportioned to the seriousness of the crimes, after having been warned and served notice by registered postal delivery and or substitute service of pending criminal and civil litigation. Now to All offending Offices whether directly or indirectly involved or by proxy in any way, shall be deemed to have been served upon citation whether having received or viewed a hard paper copy form or having received a verbal communication to the existence of this Claim of Rights of Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) and amalgamated Maori Incorporations for and on behalf of the Beneficiaries / Shareholders; and 10.1E Injuries, damages and punitive damages; As detailed in any claim, if the said claimant, his heirs and successors should happen to find themselves incarcerated or appearing in court as defendants, We the claimants do now proclaim as Tangata Whenua Rangatira for the Court records to give Full Power and effect to our PLEA in BAR, we do not consent to being misrepresented as defendants, for we are Rangatira exercising Executive Powers and EQUITABLE PARTNERS to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, her heirs and successors in accordance with He Whakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Aotearoa1835, Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840 and Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993, Section 5 this Act shall bind the Crown(UK) and (NZ); therefore, All administrators of the Parliament, NZ Courts and other Governmental Departments duly being royal Subjects and servants of Her Majesty are the Defendants in this instance and now have 5 days in which to rebut these facts; failure to do so shall be deemed as an agreement with the facts stated herein, of this said Commercial claim of rights affidavit and doth consent to all liabilities and injuries by express tacit agreement and SHALL be bound to the continuance of this said Claim for the next 1000 years. As detailed in any claim with invoiced amounts of monies in compensation for injuries, damages and/or punitive damages providing proof of default and dishonour by way of injuries aforementioned and breaches of Trust, thus leading to immediate private civil or criminal prosecution, an option of last resort, however necessary to obtain lawful remedy and recourse for said injuries and damages; 10.2 Furthermore, I claim the right to address any potential criminal actions of any police officers, Government Ministers, Principals or Agents or Justice System Participants who having been served or cautioned of this commercial claim, or other commercial claims served by the management of Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc.) and amalgamated Maori Incorporations for and behalf of all Beneficiaries and Shareholders who have failed / fails to dispute, discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interferes by acts or omission with the lawful exercise of property claimed and established rights and freedoms; and Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both; and Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open form using discussion and negotiation and to capture on videotape said discussions and negotiations for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit; and
st

10.3 10.4

Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 21 of 32

Any affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their Own counterclaims shall respond appropriately within five (5) days or 120 hours of service of notice of this action. We formally request all responses shall be under your sworn Oath of Office and your sworn Oath of Allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, her heirs and successors and upon your Full Commercial Insurance Liability Surety Bond card and number and the Bond Surety Company or Agency you are bonded with issued forthwith, also under penalty of perjury and treason and herein provided no later than five (5) days or 120 hours from the date of original service; and To whom it may concern; failure of responding or rebutting each of my points, on a point-bypoint basis, shall be deemed as an agreement with the facts stated herein, of this said Commercial affidavit and doth consent forthwith to all liabilities, injuries and authority to open new store account(s) in your name in any shop anywhere by express tacit agreement, provided that, proof of claim shall be in the form of a Court Summons with defendant name and criminal charge(s) along with this said Personal Commercial Liability Affidavit Bond and SHALL also be bound to the continuance of this said Claim for the next 1000 years; I Kevin (Wayne Bluegum: ) his heirs and successors, Declare, that the facts contained in this Commercial Claim of Rights Affidavit is a true, correct and complete record; of the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth; and

Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default and permanent and irrevocable estoppels by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against My Self and Tamariki; Tangata Whenua/Maori Internal Sovereign Heads in Right of the Dominion/State o Aotearoa/New Zealand

Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Native Assessor(s), which is an Officer of the Court of competent jurisdiction to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm my Whanau, (family(s), household(s) and or the Beneficiaries / Shareholders of Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) and all Amalgamated Maori Incorporations or my and or our TRADE NAMES or my and or our interests, directly or indirectly or by proxy in any way. 41 Beach Road, KatiKati, Bay of Plenty, Aotearoa, Te Ika a Maui Claimant: Kevin (Wayne Bluegum: ) his Whanau, heirs and successors Secured Party Creditor(s), reserve all rights not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I/we did not enter knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally; and Furthermore, I/we do not accept any liability of the compelled benefits of any unlawful Contracts or Commercial agreements, therefore the enforcement of this said commercial claim of rights affidavit shall commence upon receipt in your office; and I make this sole affirmation as true and correct to the best of my knowledge; Dated this 25th day of August 2010AD

KEVIN (Wayne Bluegum:)


Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 22 of 32
st

Dated this 25th day of August 2010AD as witnessed by Tangata Whenua, Lawful Sovereigns, and Mokopuna of the Confederation of United Tribes o Aotearoa 1835 Cc To: Anand Satyanand, dba, GOVERNOR GENERAL PRIVATE BAG, GOVERNMENT HOUSE WELLINGTON And to: Chief Justice, Dame Sian Elias, SUPREME COURT, PO Box 61, Wellington
Michael Cullen, dba, ATTORNEY GENERAL PO Box 3705, Wellington Mark Burton, dba, MINISTER OF JUSTICE Parliament Building, Wellington Annette King, dba, MINISTER OF POLICE & JUSTICE Parliament Building, Wellington Howard Broad, dba, COMMISSIONER OF POLICE PO Box 3017, Wellington Parekura Horomia, dba MINISTER OF MAORI AFFAIRS Parliament Building, Wellington Hone Harawira, dba, MAORI PARTY Parliament Building, Wellington Dame Margaret Bazley, dba, COMMISSIONER of Inquiries to Police Conduct Hon Christopher Finlayson, dba ATTORNEY GENERAL Parliament Building, Wellington Hon Simon Power, dba MINISTER OF JUSTICE Parliament Building, Wellington. Hon Judith Collins, dba MINISTER OF POLICE & JUSTICE Parliament Building, Wellington Howard Broad, dba, COMMISSIONER OF POLICE PO Box 3017, Wellington Hon Dr Pita Sharples, dba, MINISTER OF MAORI AFFAIRS Parliament Building, Wellington Hone Harawira, dba, MAORI PARTY Parliament Building, Wellington Dame Margaret Bazley, dba, COMMISSIONER of Inquiries to Police Conduct

Cc

The following is re: to secrecy provisions performed by; Justice I-ABORRIN Constable Murphy, Constable Hay, Constable O Kane, Constable Bland, Snr Constable Rice, Sgt Wharton, Sgt Shaw, Sgt Lowe, Detective Sgt Grace, Snr Sgt Shields HAMILTON [HM] Constable Robertson, Sgt Casson - HAMILTON [HM] Inspector Ewers WELLINGTON Crown Prosecutors: Mrs Wickham, Ms Hook, P Gorringe, R Douch, L Dunn Com. Magistrates: M Brooker, P Oettii, K Wolvers, B Roach, P Fergusson District/High Court Judge: Justice SPIER, MAZE.J, HARROP.J, BURNETTE.J

The above Correspondence is in reference to the 1st private letter/Affidavit dated 11-8-2006, and the 2nd Commercial Affidavit dated 31-8-2007 easy track number: NO 026 828 125NZ; ALL entities and persons mentioned in said claim; now is rejoinder to Affidavit 1 & 2 and this 3rd Commercial Claim of Rights Affidavit dated 18-3-2008; and the Commercial Claim of Right Affidavit dated 25th August 2010. To Anand Satyanand and Dame Sian Elias; you are hereby formerly directed and instructed without prejudice or ill will, to forward all correspondence of this said Claim of Rights to all your underlings aforementioned, through your established lines of communication effective forthwith, and this Commercial Claim shall commence upon its receipt in your office. Further note as to the NOTICE of proceedings in the Supreme Court Privy Council (NZ) to be received and accepted for consideration by your respective offices in a timely fashion; Reference: Page 30 of this commercial instrument. Constitutional and Legal Status of Aotearoa (New Zealand) in the 21st Century
Section 4

Memorandum of Evidence:
Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 23 of 32
st

In 1908 the Crown of England agreed to (Aotearoa) New Zealand and the Parliament of New South Wales residing in Wellington, New Zealand, becoming a self-Governing country and a Dominion instead of a Colony of the Crown of England. Hence in 1947 the jurisdiction of the lowest Court in New Zealand was established, under the statute of Westminster Act 1947 came the District Courts Act 1947. The Parliament of New South Wales, residing in Wellington New Zealand, in their efforts to secure the Country, Adopted the Westminster Adoption Act 1947 to which this gave them the power to make Full Laws for themselves. Westminster Parliament ordered once again that they would be held subject to Section 8 of that Act, which reads; Nothing in this Act shall give any power to repeal the 1852 Constitution Act of the Colony of Australia or the 1852 Constitution Act of the Dominion of New Zealand Therefore, the New South Wales Parliament has no authority to alter or repeal the 1852 Constitution of the Dominion of New Zealand, though they had adopted that Act, it did not give them the right to govern, only the right to make Full Laws for themselves. In 1986, at the enactment of the New Zealand Constitution Act 1986, by the Parliament of New South Wales, residing in Wellington, New Zealand, repealed the New Zealand Constitution Act 1852, in breach of Section 8 of the Westminster Adoption Act 1947. To which, they are the authors of their own demise, in that the New South Wales Parliament, residing at Wellington, did, in 1986 repeal the 1852 New Zealand Constitution Act, that allowed them to obtain a Warrant, for themselves, for the limited powers, to govern over both the British and European subjects only. Now therefore, be it known to all man, that the Law making procedures, now rest with the Maori Peoples, being Tangata Whenua, holding Mana Whenua and Kaitiakitanga, the Internal Sovereigns in Right of Aotearoa (NZ), under Part XIII of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 [Maori Land Act 1993], Sections 253 and 253A and Section 17(3) of Te Ture Whenua Amendment Act 1994. In Section 284 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 [Maori Land Act 1993]; Whereas Maori are able to overwrite any law of parliament of New Zealand of New South Wales residing in Wellington or any regulations made by the Governor General residing in Wellington or any Court in New Zealand, thus any Case, that Maori wish, for the return of their Land can be actioned by, a mere application by way of order, is to be application by way of order, is to be applied to a Maori Incorporation, to enforce it under Section 144 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 [Maori Land Act 1993], to Her Majestys Council of the United Kingdom, to issue Letters Patent under Section 71 and Section 10 of the New Zealand Constitution Act 1846. Paying particular interest to the determination made by Lord Phillimore in the common law of England of the United Kingdom as referred to in Section 5 of the Imperial Laws Application Act 1988 which states; Common Law of the United Kingdom shall form part of the Law of New Zealand, The common law stated by Lord Phillimore in Hineti Rerireri v- Public Trustee stated; Maori Customary Law enjoys Legal Recognisable status in European Colonial Courts in New Zealand, in the absence of any statute indicating otherwise That statute being enacted by the Native inhabitants themselves, in which the Native inhabitants, have never made an Enactment to repeal any Constitutional Rights as yet. Lord Watson in determining the meaning of the Native Title: stated, Everything that is owned by Maori under Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840, and prior to the Treaty of Waitangi, including He
Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 24 of 32
st

Whakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Aotearoa 1835 [Declaration of Independence of New Zealand 1835] Lord Watson presiding in Nihara Tamaki v- Baker: stated; There were numerous statutes which I have already mentioned, and Common Law doctrines that by referring to the Native Title or such like, plainly assumes tenure of land under Custom and Usage, which is either known to lawyers or discoverable by evidence Lord Watson was saying that the lawyers are just plum lazy! Lord Watson was unwilling to accept that an issue of a Crown Grant amounted to an extinguishment of the Native Title. He further stated that, The Crown has not yet purchased one inch of soil under its First Right of Pre-emption and in accordance with the Treaty of Waitangi 1840 Since the Crown has not purchased one inch of soil in New Zealand, The Crown lacked Unreviewable Prerogative Power in relation to the Native Title, and that it is rather late in the day for the Parliament of New South Wales, residing in Wellington New Zealand and the Colonial Bench such as the High Court or any such Court, to deny the, NATIVE TITLE LEGAL STATUS In the case of Willis v- the Attorney General an agreement between the Bishop of Wellington and the Maori Tribe, as to a block of Land The Tribes gifted some land to the Bishop of Wellington, to build a school. The Government issued him with a Crown Grant. She took away the gift. The Crown Grant gave the Bishop of Wellington full title to the land, despite the gift reached by the Tribes and the Bishop. The NZ Court of Appeal agreed, so an appeal went to the Privy Council of Her Majesty; The Privy Council said, tut tut well have none of that and Lord McNaughten further stated; the Court is not an instrument of executive dictate The Court of Appeal was not an instrument of Parliament, to dictate to, by Statute of Law. It wasnt their job to uphold the Breach of Trust and quash the title. And then Lord McNaughten squashed the Crown grant that was issued to the Bishop of Wellington and the orders issued by the NZ Court of Appeal, confirming it was insufficient due to want of land purchase. And then he further stated; that the Native Title remained Unextinguished In the same Court hearing, Lord Stanley arose and put the Head and Protection over the Native Title by concluding that; For as long as the Treaty of Waitangi 1840 remains as a Protectorate of the Declaration of Independence o Aotearoa 1835, the Native Title will always remain forever Unextinguished Consequently, by the Parliament of New South Wales residing in Wellington, New Zealand, repealing the New Zealand Constitution Act 1852 meant that the Statute of Westminster Adoption Act 1947, to which they adopted to make Full Laws for themselves, no longer existed. Therefore, the evidence we have presented, clearly shows that at no time, have we the Maori Peoples, being Tangata Whenua, holding Mana Whenua throughout the Nation of Aotearoa, ever made an Enactment to Repeal any Customary Law as yet, leaves only one conclusion, The Parliament of New South Wales, residing in Wellington, New Zealand, their Governor General also residing at Wellington, their Select Committees and Courts, has managed to Legislate themselves, out of Constitutional and Legal Existence Adding that despite the many claims and views of various organisations and persons, who presume to represent the Maori Peoples, for example;
Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 25 of 32
st

The New Zealand Maori Congress Maori Trust Boards Iwi Runanga Maori Land Courts Te Puni Kokiri Maori Development Councils Maori Electorates in Parliament Trust and Incorporations constituted by the Maori Land Courts Maori Organisations under the Incorporated Societies Act 1908 Charitable Trust Act 1957 Given that these Organisations do not have a mandate by the Maori Peoples and are mere CREATURES created by the Illegal Government, of the Parliament of New South Wales residing in Wellington, New Zealand, do have a similar entity of illegality and require Consent and Assent of Tangata Whenua, holding Mana Whenua and Kaitiakitanga. Therefore, the Bodies and Natural Persons holding the Prerogative Powers are those Constituted under the; 1. He Whakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Aotearoa 1835; (United, Confederated and Incorporated) 2. Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840 3. Body Corporate existing today under Te Ture Whenua Maori Incorporation Constitutions Regulations Act 1995 4. The Common Law of the United Kingdom. And so, if a Maori Incorporation stated its cause under, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 [Maori Land Act 1993] Section 144 Maori Customary Land deemed Crown Land for certain purposes 1) Notwithstanding any of the foregoing provisions of this Part of this Act, but subject to subsection (4) of this section, Maori Customary Land shall be deemed Crown Land within the meaning of the Land Act 1948 for the purposes of (a) Recovering possession of the Land from any person in wrongful occupation of the Land: 3) Where proceedings are brought by or on behalf of the Crown pursuant to subsection (2) of this section, the Crown Land to which the proceedings relate and for the benefit of those owners. 4) Notwithstanding any of the foregoing provisions of this Part of this Act, proceedings 1. For the recovery from the Crown of the possession of Maori Customary Land (b) For damages from the Crown in respect of any trespass or injury to Maori Customary Land May be brought in any Court by the Maori Trustee on behalf of the beneficial owners of that land and for the purposes of any such proceedings, the Maori Trustee shall be presumed, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, to be authorised to represent the beneficial owners of that Land.
Compare: 1953 No 94, s159

The Treaty of Waitangi 1840; Article 1 states as follows

Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 26 of 32

st

The Land is held by the Crown in Trust for Maori. It is Maori Customary Land that the Queen holds forever, Maori Customary Land deemed Crown Land for the purposes of. That concludes the British Crowns determination and extent of the Native Title. So in conclusion, the Memorandum of Evidence we have presented, clearly shows that at no time have we Te Whakaminenga o Nga Rangatira o Aotearoa ever relinquished 1. 2. 3. Tino Rangatiratanga / Sovereignty / Prerogative Powers Customary Titleship Customary Lands

And so, it boils down to Section 144 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993; Wrongful Occupation Constitutional / Legal Status: 2003 The Political and Legal status of Aotearoa (New Zealand) on this, the 14th day of June 2003 and onward is as follows; Sovereign Territories of Aotearoa (NZ) The Native Inhabitants of Aotearoa (NZ), have never, at any time, during the period between 1800 2003, relinquished any Customary Rights or Prerogative Powers during this period, in accordance with the protection guaranteed under He Whakaputanga o Te Rangatiratanga o Aotearoa 1835: (Declaration of Independence of New Zealand 1835) Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840: British Crown: All Covenants and Treaties are still in existence, to which several Privy Council Rulings between 1900 2000 have upheld and reinforced the Principles and Objectives of Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840: He Whakaputanga o Te Rangatiratanga o Aotearoa 1835: (Declaration of Independence of New Zealand 1835) Colonial Settlers: The Constitutional and Legal situation in the colonial Parliament, being The Parliament of New South Wales, residing in Wellington New Zealand, has managed to legislate itself into Legal Limbo, as follows 1. 1852: Native Inhabitants did, at no time, consent to the enactment of the New Zealand Constitutional Act 1852 To which the Parliament of New South Wales, residing in Wellington New Zealand, did Breach the Terms of the Warrant, and 2. 1937 Nihara v- Baker Lord Watson of the Privy Council stated two things; (a) Numerous Statutes and Common Laws Doctrines referring to Native Titleship, and (b) The Crown had no purchased one-inch of soil under its First Right of Pre-emption.
Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 27 of 32
st

3. Willis v- the Attorney General (a) Lord McNaughton of the Privy Council stated that, the Court is not an instrument of executive dictate and he further stated, we are not here to uphold a Breach of Law. (b) Lord Stanley then rose to put a Head and Protection over the Native Titleship by stating 1. Treaty of Waitangi in existence. 2. Declaration of Independence 1835 covered by Protectorate. 3. Native Titleship Unextinguished. 4. Heneti Rerireri v- Public Trust (a) Lord Phillimore stated, Maori Customary Law enjoys legal recognisable status in European Colonial Courts in New Zealand, in the absence of any statute indicating otherwise Westminster Adoption Act 1947 Parliament of New South Wales residing in Wellington, New Zealand, did repeal the 1852 New Zealand Constitution in Breach of Section 8 Westminster Adoption Act 1947.

5.

Legal Argument: Given Legal rulings by the Privy Council, we have clearly shown that the Sovereign and Customary rights of the Native Inhabitants of the Territories of Aotearoa (NZ) as guaranteed under He Whakaputanga o Te Rangatiratanga o Nga Hapu o Aotearoa 1835 (Declaration of Independence of New Zealand 1835) and Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840. To which we add that Constitutional Breaches from 1852 2008 has created a Legal and Constitutional crises for the Parliament of New South Wales residing in Wellington New Zealand. Therefore it boils down to Section 144 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 [Maori Land Act 1993] as follows Section 144: Maori Customary land shall be deemed to be Crown land with the meaning of the Land Act 1948 for the purposes of (1) (a) (4) (c) (d) For the recovery from the Crown of the possession of Maori Customary Land For damages from the Crown in respect of any trespass or injury to Maori Customary Land Recovering possession of the Land from any person in wrongful occupation of the Land:

May be brought in any Court by the Maori Trustee on behalf of the beneficial owners of that land and, for the purposes of any such proceedings, the Maori Trustee shall be PRESUMED, in the absence of EVIDENCE to the contrary, to be Authorised to represent the Beneficial Owners (Native Inhabitants of Aotearoa) of that Land. These are our submissions in regard to whom is the
Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 28 of 32
st

Legal Internal Sovereign Heads in Right of the Dominion / State o Aotearoa (NZ) and TRUSTEE

Proclamation by Ordinance and an Act of State o Te Whakaminenga o Nga Rangatira o Aotearoa 2008
Proclamation by Ordinance, and an Act of State, and in the terms of Section 2, 12, 15(b) and Section 250 and 253 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 [Maori Land Act 1993], and in accordance with Paragraph 140 of the Court of Appeal decision CA173/01 CA75/02 in Ngati Apa & Others v- Attorney General & Others dated the 19th day of June, 2003; that the Maori Peoples / Tangata Whenua o Aotearoa (NZ) and the British Crown of the United Kingdom in Her Majestys name; in Terms of Section 5 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 [Maori Land Act 1993]; Proclaim Sovereignty to the Soil / Whenua / Land and that no Title to the Land, Foreshore and Seabed of the South Pacific Ocean to the Continental Shelf, Rangatiratanga / Governance, Forest, Fisheries, Estates / Towns / Cities and Villages and all other Taonga tuku iho / Treasures in, on, under and above Aotearoa (NZ) Unextinguished of the Native / Aboriginal Title; and that Maori Tangata Whenua Shall not acknowledge any Title as aforesaid as Valid which has not been purchased by the British Crown of the United Kingdom by way of Crown Grant under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom. The foregoing Proclamation by Ordinance and an Act of State 2008 were duly made by Te Whakaminenga o Nga Rangatira o Nga Hapu o Aotearoa by Special Order passed and Adopted at a Special Meeting of the said Te Whakaminenga o Nga Rangatira convened for that purpose on the 13th day of October, 2007; confirmed by the said Te Whakaminenga o Nga Rangatira on the 20th day of January, 2008; and by Resolution passed at Te Tii Marae, Waitangi by the said Te Whakaminenga o Nga Rangatira on the 6th day of February, 2008; Ordered to come into force on the 10th day of March, 2008; and Reaffirmed and Adopted this claim as the Constitution of Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc.) at a Special Meeting of Te Whakaminenga O Nga Rangatira O Nga Hapu o Aotearoa convened for that purpose on the 4th day of August, 2010; confirmed by the said Te Whakaminenga o Nga Rangatira on the 25th day of August, 2010; and by Resolution passed at Te Whakaminenga O Te Rangatira, O Nga Hapu, O Aotearoa, Venue: Te Kuri a Tawhirimatea Marae: Burstein House, 41 Beach Road, KatiKati

KEVIN (WAYNE BLUEGUM) WITNESSED BY MY FATHER IN HEAVEN ON THE EARTH

Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 29 of 32

st


TRADING FLAG OF NU TIRENI 17TH AUGUST 1835

NGA URI WHAKATIPURUNGA O NGARAE (INC.)



To: Anand Satyanand and Dame Sian Elias; As Representations of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II heir to the British Crown UK (Trustee.)and (Protector.) Reference: Anand Satyanand / GOVERNOR GENERAL NZ; and Notice of Nomination and Appointment Dame Sian Elias Easy Track / Contract CO4/10/1/8 Easy Track / Contract RO 108 357 604

Dated: 13th March 2008 Dated: 21st May 2008

NOTICE OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE SUPREME COURT WELLINGTON Privy Council in [NZ] IN THE MATTER OF THE Secured Party, Representative [The MAORI TRUSTEE] and as the Representative of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II heir to the British Crown UK

I Kevin Wayne (Bluegum:) He Mokopuna, He Whakaputanga O Nga Hapu O Aotearoa 1835, being a titled sovereign by birth right, and as a beneficiary of the British Crown UK, Te Tiriti O Waitangi February 6th 1840, as the Chairperson and Management of Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc.) The Secured Party having full capacity in the discharge of the obligations of the trust in the best interests of the shareholders, to carry on or undertake any business or activity, do any act, or enter into any transaction; and for the purposes thereof full rights, powers and privileges; and Whereas this Constitution of MEMORANDUM OF EVIDENCE, UNDERSTANDINGS, INTENT, PROCLAMATION AND CLAIMED RIGHTS; and by discovery of evidence as revealed within these presents as declared by the Secured Party and amalgamated Maori Incorporations, on all (Constructive Trusts) and or the Agent(s) / Principal(s) and or Principal(s) / Agent(s) of the [CROWN] (the VICTORIA CORPORATION LONDON], for and behalf of all Beneficiaries / Shareholders, served by Registered Postal Delivery and by substitute service; Do hereby Demand Immediate Payment by all Principals / Agents and or Agent and Principal and or all (Constructive Trust(s).) of the CROWN on receipt in your offices of these Commercial Instruments; and Therefore I / we Kevin - Wayne - (Bluegum:) for and on behalf of and in the best interests of all Beneficiaries / Shareholders; and my / our Whanau / Families heirs and successors, and having instructed and directed our office of the Maori Trustee His Lordship the Honorable Murray Chittenden, 969 Riverlea Road, South Hastings, Representative of Queen Elizabeth II, as to CHARGES OF TREASON Section 73 Crimes Act 1961 Treason Act 1751 section 8 statute of Westminster Adoption Act 1947 against THE CROWN (NZ) AND TRESPASS UPON THE LANDS OF THE BENEFICIAL
Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 30 of 32
st

OWNERS (Native Inhabitants Of Aotearoa) in the terms of the provisions of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993.section 144; and filed and registered in the Supreme Court at Wellington as the (QUEEN Vs The CROWN). I / we, do hereby formerly direct and instruct without prejudice or ill will, that a date at your earliest convenience, for a Supreme Court Hearing is required by the Secured Party, in order for Our Management to bring all, Claims of Rights, breaches of natural justice, claims of theft, fraud, coercion and other criminal and activities committed, by the Principals / Agents and or Agents / Principals (Constructive Trusts) the CROWN. against He Mokopuna, o te Whakaputanga O Nga Hapu O Aotearoa 1835, and Treason against Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, (Trustee) and Protector of all Beneficiaries / Shareholders. Therefore by these presents I / We declare that the Honorable Dame Sian Elias Chief Justice of The Supreme Court of Wellington accept as filed and registered in the Supreme Court, In the matter of the Maori Trustee as the representative of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II (Trustee), and as the Representation of He Mokopuna O Nga Rangatira o Nga Hapu O te Whakaputanga 1835 or and on behalf of and in the best interests of the Beneficiaries / Shareholders of the Secured Party and amalgamated Maori Incorporations against the CROWN (Queen Elizabeth II heir to the British Crown UK Vs the CROWN.) For the immediate payment of all claims and breaches and for all claims for damages and compensation (Fee Schedule) or as formally requested to furnish a Commercial Liability Insurance Surety Bond forthwith, as established by law and consistent with the principles of fundamental justice, and or the transfer of all Properties, Tangible / intangible Real or incorporeal including the Stock Chattels and Assets of the all Constructive Trusts; Principals / Agents, and or Agents / principal accordance to: UCC3 503 NOTICE OF DISHONOUR (b) Notice of Dishonour may be given by any person and by commercially reasonable means, including an oral, written, or electronic communication; and is sufficient if it reasonably identifies the instrument and indicates that the instrument has been dishonoured or has not been paid or accepted. Return of the Instrument given to the Bank 12CFR Section 210 .2 Definitions (d) Bank means a person engaged in the Business of Banking, is sufficient notice of Dishonour. (c) Subject to Section 3-504 (c) with respect to an instrument taken for collection Notice of Dishonour must be given within 30 days, following day on which persons receive Notice of Dishonour [With respect to any other Instrument 30 days following the day on which dishonour occurs] which is the day of Receipt. By these presents, all Parties herein and hereafter have been notified of and now all shall pay for dishonour failure to honour this offer shall be deemed (to mean) you agree by express tacit agreement to the facts herein contained and have waived all your rights to a Notice of Protest, all judicial immunities and recourse doth hereby consent to this Claim as Legal Tender (as accepted in the principles and rules of equity), and to a charge of treason, an immediate Administrative Judgment and immediate dismissal from office; Person(s) Easy Track / Contract Number(s) Fee Schedule
1

John Whitehead / SECRETARY OF NZ TREASURY Ross McPherson / INTERNAL AFFAIRS Ross Patterson / MAYOR WESTERN BAY DISTRICT COUNCIL Judge Christiansen / ASSOCIATE JUDGE / HIGH COURT AUCKLAND G Best / COMMUNITY MAGISTRATE
1

RO 124 177 433 NZ $423,077,808.82 JA 102 732 902 NZ $530,000.00 RO 115 918 208 NZ $2,600,000.00

RO122 309 922 NZ

$530,000.00

The Uniform Commercial code (UCC or the Code)


st

Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 31 of 32

TAURANGA DISTRICT COURT Rebecca Morgan / TAURANGA DISTRICT COURT Officer Hunter / POLICE PROSECUTIONS TAURANGA John Fitzgerald / SENIOR CONSTABLE KATIKATI POLICE Lindsay Freeman / CONSTABLE KATIKATI POLICE Michael Harris & Gordon Thomas / NATIONAL BANK RURAL LENDING SERVICES David Murray John Fisk / PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPER James Douglas / MINTERELLISONRUDDWATTS

JD 110 812 488 NZ $157, 873, 568.00 JD 110 812 488 NZ$157, 873, 568.00 JD 110 812 488 NZ$157, 873, 568.00 JD 110 812 488 NZ$157, 873, 568.00 JD 110 812 488 NZ$157, 873, 568.00 RQ 104 162 338 NZ $62, 917 364.00 RO 133 749 854 NZ $62, 917 364.00 JC 103 041 188 NZ $62, 917 364.00

Ken Dowdall / CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING MANAGER OTAGO DAILY TIMES HR Te Maipi / REGISTRAR MINISTRY JUSTICE WAIHI DISTRICT COURT

JC 102 812 234 NZ $19,080,000.00

JD 110 812 474 NZ $1,067,939.00 _________________ TOTAL $21,874,409,094.90

PUBLIC NOTICES Declaration, Proclamation of Sovereignty: TRADE & EXCHANGE 12th, 19th April and 10th May 2007 Unextinguished Title: NEW ZEALAND HERALD 24th April and 1st, 16th May 2008 Copy Right Notice: TRADE & EXCHANGE 5th, 12th and 19th February 2009

NOTICE TO THE PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO THE AGENT NOTICE TO THE AGENT IS NOTICE TO THE PRINCIPAL

Dated this 25th day in the month of August in the year of our Lord 2010

___________________________________ Chairperson Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc.) PO Box 176 KatiKati 3129

Tino Rangatiratanga o Nga Hap o Aotearoa/Maori Sovereignty in the 21 Century A Tribute to the Memory of the late Royal Regent Law Lord Hohepa Mapiria Nga Uri Whakatipurunga O Ngarae (Inc) O Nu Tireni, (Aotearoa), [NZ] 2010 Page 32 of 32

st