You are on page 1of 3

Monitoring instrument for e-learning materials in the centers

very good Accessibility


The materials are easily accessible from different regions and hardware. The materials are constantly targeting different learning styles. The materials are offering adequate and timely tutor support. The materials met all quality criteria.

good
The materials are accessible from different regions and hardware. The materials are targeting different learning styles. The materials are offering enough and timely tutor support. The materials are satisfying some quality criteria. The materials are offering enough feedback to the trainees. The materials are providing good records keeping and statistics. The materials are fairly adapted and accessible for people with special educational needs.

satisfactory
The materials are accessible with some difficulties from different regions and hardware. The materials are targeting enough different learning styles. The materials are offering some tutor support. The materials are satisfying few quality criteria. The materials are offering satisfactory feedback to the trainees. The materials are providing satisfactory records keeping and statistics. The materials are accessible with some difficulties for people with special educational needs.

poor
The materials are barely accessible from different regions and hardware. The materials are occasionally targeting different learning styles. The materials are offering occasional tutor support. The materials are satisfying poor quality criteria. The materials are offering occasional feedback to the trainees. The materials are providing occasional records keeping and statistics. The materials are barely adapted and accessible for people with special educational needs.

not present
The materials are not accessible from different regions and hardware. The materials are not targeting different learning styles.

Different learning styles

Timely support

The materials are not offering any tutor support. The materials are not satisfying quality criteria. The materials are not offering any feedback to the trainees. The materials are not providing any records keeping and statistics. The materials are not adapted and accessible for people with special educational needs.

Quality assurance

Feedback to the trainees

The materials are offering more than adequate feedback to the trainees. The materials are providing very good and easily accessible record keeping and statistics. The materials are adapted and easily accessible for people with special educational needs.

Providing records and statistics

Special educational needs

1
Material produced under Phare 2006 financial support PHARE TVET RO2006/018-147.04.01.02.01.03.01

E-learning material ___________________________ Center/School _______________________________ Date _______________________________________

Monitoring team ____________________________

Monitoring instrument for e-learning modules in the centers


very good Navigation
The module was very easy to navigate. The module has adequate information about its content and delivery methods. The module was very easy to understand and follow. The module was covering the subject thoroughly. The module met all learning objectives.

good
The module was easy to navigate. The module has information about its content and delivery methods. The module was easy to understand and follow. The module was covering almost all the subject. The module was meeting almost all learning objectives. Assessm ent in the module is in favour of supporting learning process. Learners could benefit from this module.

satisfactory
The module was to some extent easy to navigate. The module has some information about its content and delivery methods. The module was to some extent easy to understand and follow. The module was covering the subject to some extent. The module was meeting most of the learning objectives. Assessment in the module is sometime supporting learning process. Learners could partly benefit from this module.

poor
The module was not very easy to navigate. The module has poor information about its content and delivery methods. The module was not very easy to understand and follow. The module was not covering the most of the subject. The module was meeting just few learning objectives. Assessm ent in the module is poorly supporting learning process. Learners could have few benefits from this module.

not present
One could not navigate through the module. The module has no information about its content and delivery methods. One could not understand and follow the module. The module was not covering the subject at all. The module was not meeting any learning objective. Assessment in the module is not design to support learning process. Learners could not benefit from this module.

Information about the module

Understandability and usage

Subject covered

Learning objectives

Assessment

Assessment in the module is strongly supporting learning process. Learners could benefit greatly from this module.

Learners benefits

2
Material produced under Phare 2006 financial support PHARE TVET RO2006/018-147.04.01.02.01.03.01

E-learning module ___________________________ Center/School _______________________________ Date _______________________________________ Monitoring team ____________________________

3
Material produced under Phare 2006 financial support PHARE TVET RO2006/018-147.04.01.02.01.03.01