The term horizontal intra-business communication we mean communication and information flow between executives of the same organizational

level within the company. That exchange of information between executives who realize they are near the same level of organizational hierarchy. In this sense, it's well within a company there are a number of such networks. Often these networks are not shown in the chart and are part of the informal communication network (informal system of communication). This has resulted not know the form of information moving through these channels, while in the literature that I have consulted states that in addition to information about the company, these channels are used for carriage and no information concerning the business (on a personal, friendly). But what I see is that through this communication network, executives are learning at any given moment what it does each of them within the company. This also help to discuss and exchange views and enhance their own individual projects. Following the above considerations I conclude that the horizontal-company communication stems from the organizational structure of the company and the information and wording of questions. This form of communication is needed between the strains for the following reasons: Assists in the coordination of activities (project coordination) Contributes to solve (to solve problems) Supports collaboration among staff (support the cooperation) Creates a condition for exchange (exchange of ideas) Assists in the efficient transmission of information (share the information) It provides mechanisms for dealing with internal conflicts (conflicts resolution) To enable the management of an enterprise to control the horizontal-company communication is really hard work. I believe that the problems that arise from this communication network is more severe and disepilyta than may appear from the classical model of communication (communication from top to bottom and vice versa). I mention three problems that can confront the administration. First and quite difficult to capture, is the size and network quality of horizontal communication. Second is the possible distortion of information occurs when a message moves between strains of the same hierarchy within the company. Third, and equally difficult is the influence of this network to potential domestic conflict or even the challenge of such an orderly movement. Until now I tried to explain the importance of horizontal intra-organizational communication. Understanding then the previous statement, go ahead and suggest some strategies for enhancing and improving this form of communication. The Administration should first of all to try to set the network size and quality of communication. This means that managers of departments must be addressed by creating relationships between subordinates and subordinates from other departments. This cross-divisional communication will provide another boost to horizontal communication. They also created and official bodies within the company, as project teams with members from different departments, their respective meetings to launch this policy. Also, the Administration should analyze the system of rewards and incentives has had and will definitely need to connect to the existence and operation of horizontal communication. That must find ways to reduce competition between departments and thus enhance the development of good relations. Another thing that can happen is to create a climate of teamwork in all segments (teamwork). This is the work of managers. Gradually a daily basis cultivated the perception that to be successful the company must all understand the concept of teamwork and cooperation at all levels of communication. Certainly any attempt to influence and change the fixed ideas, but focusing on commonalities with all officers and taking care to display these, I will yield. Do not forget that communication is vital for a business. So everything should be working on a model that supports the cohesion, unity, teamwork and care to

highlight the common elements and common expectations of management. It will ensure to soothe and appease the differences and conflicts are inevitable in an organization consisting of people. Inevitably, most companies "suffer" from failures in everyday communication among the staff. This is why come obstacles and barriers in the communication process. Anything that interferes with and hinders the process of understanding a message is a barrier to communication. I think we all more or less, we are familiar with the classic model of communication that says that any communication process there must be a transmitter, the channel and the receiver must be the case the dispatch and receipt of the message and of course must be done The encoding - decoding respectively. Effective communication we have in case the recipient of the message fully understand the message has been sent by the sender. With this model, therefore, I try to think what can go wrong in this process in order to say that communication was a failure. I think that good and effective communication must have some features like: Use appropriate language that is used by all stakeholders to understand and simple expressions. Be addressed only to him or to those on the message, ie the respective persons, not necessarily for everyone. To be selected and used whenever a suitable tool for the communication process, ie via telephone or e-mail or in person, etc. Be at the appropriate time, ie the receiver, for example, is available to the message at the right time to use it. So going beyond my thinking, I conclude that some of the barriers are: If the sender and recipient have different backgrounds, culture and broader experience and knowledge (culture, background and bias). It is true that in this case the cognitive ability of participants is different and this leads to incorrect coding and decoding. If over-emphasized the "I", ie when communicating through the message focused on ourselves, this can lead to confusion and conflict. Where there is' interference (noise), such as anxiety, inability to concentrate on purpose, continuous interruptions to the work of each participant. Such situations are daily business can be a barrier to effective communication among managers. Following the last I would say that if the working environment does not ensure proper working conditions for staff (environmental factors), this alone can be a barrier to communication. For example, the location of offices, the distance between them, to ensure calm in the room, cleanliness, etc. If the sender and recipient are of different hierarchical position within the company (superiority and ego). For example, when a senior manager sends a report to the head of production, is supposed to give the necessary attention. Otherwise, when the chief delegate a reference to the highest rank officer is not necessary to do the same. When used in speech, written or oral, which includes obscure information and messages (use of jargon). For example, if a chief computer sends a signal to managers of other departments with technical terminology that is difficult to understand. If a sender communication channels are not full information is available to the (partial information), or the wrong channel, ie with modified content (incomplete & incorrect information). If the transmission of information is not the right time (inappropriate & poor timing). For example, to recall some deadlines are approaching long before specific dates are likely to be forgotten or not given due attention. In the case between the sender and the recipient is pre-conflict (conflict), when the information is ignored or can even be diastrafei.

ER 'reference now part of the tactics that should be implemented by the company to overcome these obstacles have to suggest The following. Every business should have a specific communication policy (Communications Policy), which policy is made specific purposes. Who can be these goals? Provide an atmosphere of trust and participation in the venture. Ensure that senior management understands the business issues affecting staff, namely managers at all levels working for the company. To ensure that the issues facing the executives within the company are taken into consideration by the senior management in designing policies and strategies. Ensure that all personnel of the company is constantly updated on changes and evolution of the company, as well as how these changes affect staff. Be sure that enough time is devoted to providing advice and information to staff on major issues within the company. The communication policy should in my opinion to have been possessed by some authorities - key (key principles). A first principle is recognition of the importance of interactive communication as well as the need to reserve sufficient time to make it. It should also be given opportunities to executives of the company to express their views and give their own feedback on the strategies followed by the senior management. Also supported in any way the communication process at all levels and any block should be dealt with directly by the managers in their departments. All managers must recognize their responsibility to communicate frequently and effectively by managers of sections. All managers should recognize the responsibility to effectively listen to the strains of the Board and to encourage feedback (feedback). All employees in an enterprise should recognize their responsibility to seek and find information. How to accomplish them through the daily routine? I am sure that if a company's management understand the sources of poor communication and adopt these proposals and implement them from top to bottom, will overcome the obstacles and barriers in developing communication between managers. Also be sure to be able to minimize the 'failure of communication "and to improve the efficiency of management.