P3 Business Analysis Section A

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A.
Strategic Position
1. The need for, and purpose of, strategic and business analysis a) Recognise the fundamental nature and vocabulary of strategy and strategic decisions.[2] What is Strategy? Johnson , Scholes and Whittington (JS&W) It is the direction and scope of an organisation over the long term, which achieves advantage in a changing environment through its configuration of resources and competences with the aim of fulfilling stakeholder expectations. Strategic decisions are made under conditions of complexity and uncertainty; they have a wide impact on the organisation and often lead to major change.
This definition comes from JS&W's considering the subject matter of strategic decisions:1) long term direction 2) scope of an organisation's activities 3) gaining some kind of advantage in competition 4) some orgs will adapt their activities to fit the business environment (changing for customer future needs) 5) exploit unique resources/special competences (the org sees the environment as something it can change) 6) decisions are affected by the values and expectations of all stakeholders
Defines strategic issues Goal congruence Improve performance/chance of survival Control rather than reaction Emphasises the importance of environment Optimum use of scarce resources Forces the long term view The Hierarchy of Business Aims:
Cost in time and money Bureaucracy develops (red tape) Difficulty in predicting future Plan becomes a straightjacket (stifles initiative) Less relevance in a crisis
(and vocabulary of strategy)
Is the future state desired by the org. Aim is to guide the org's collective aspiration toward it. The org's overriding purpose. It reflects the values or expectations of stakeholders. It answers "What business are we in?" Is a statement of a general aim or purpose that supports the mission. May be qualitative in nature. Is a more specific aim or purpose and will probably be quantified. Flows from resources and competences. Unique resources Core competences create
Describes the structure of product, service and information flows between the parties involved Has two parts: monitoring the effectiveness of strategies and action; and taking corrective action when required
Page 1 of 45
09/12/2011
P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

The Ashridge Model of Mission links business strategy to culture and ethics by including four separate elements in an expanded defininition. Purpose Why does the org exist? Who does it exist for? i) to creat wealth for owners? ii) to satisfy the needs of all stakeholders? iii) to reach some higher goal eg. advancement of society? Values the beliefs and moral principles that underlie the org's culture Strategy provides the commercial logic for the company. What is our business? What should it be? Policies provides guidance on how the org's business should be conducted i.e. Standards of behaviour Strategies are developed in order to achieve desired outcomes. These are inherent in the org's mission or defining purpose. Mission guides strategic decisions and provides values and a sense of direction. A structure of goals and objectives derive from the mission and support it. All the parts of this structure should be mutually supportive. Peter Drucker, who outlined the business model Management by Objective (MbO) was the first to suggest that objectives should be SMART. S pecific M easurable A ttainable R elevant T ime-bound Functions of objectives should be PRIME. P lanning (what's the plan) R esponsibility (who is responsible) I ntegration (the efforts of the departments) M otivation (knowing what the goal is) E valuation (a check and correction system) b) Discuss how strategy may be formulated at different levels (corporate, business level, operational) of an organisation.[2]
Corporate
concerned with the overall purpose and scope of the whole organisation and how value will be added to the different parts (SBUs) of the organisation (JS&W)
is about how the organisation or it's SBUs tackle particular markets (JS&W)
Business
Operational
concerned with how the component parts of an organisation deliver effectively the corporate and business level strategies in terms of resources, processes and people (JS&W)
Page 2 of 45
09/12/2011

c) Explore the Johnson, Scholes and Whittington model for defining elements of strategic management the strategic position, strategic choices and strategy into action.[3] JS&W suggest a three part structure for thinking about strategy. The interdependencies are represented in a venn:
External Analysis Internal Analysis Stakeholder Analysis Strategic Position
Strategic Position Strategic Choices Strategy into Action
How do we compete? eg. high quality/low cost Where do we compete? How do we get there? eg. organic/franchise/acquisition Does HQ add value?
Strategic Choices
Strategy into Action Structuring eg. processes / relationships etc Enabling eg. how resources are managed Change Management
d) Analyse how strategic management is affected by different organisational contexts.[3] Characteristic Small Limited range of products in limited market Business Owner managers Significant competitive pressure Effect on Strategy Few problems of scope Based on Values and experience Exploit competences and resources. Competitive strategy is very important as is knowledge of the market and the competition Constantly building relationship with providers of funds Effect on Strategy Problems of structure, control & relationships Allocation and co-ordination of resources Great importance of logistics
Limited financial resources
Characteristic Multi Diverse products, processes and markets National Significant resources of all kinds Multiple operations and facilities
Public Powerful stakeholder influence Sector Constraints on strategic decision making by government Taxpayers money - delivery of 'best value' Competition for resource inputs
Not For Profit
Include Gov. Depts & Agencies, Trade Unions, Schools, Charities Depends on funds from sponsors - competition Primary objective unlikely to be financial Managers more concerned with resource efficiency than effectiveness
Important Note! Intangible aspects have become increasingly important for companies dealing in physical products.
Page 3 of 45
09/12/2011

e) Compare three different strategy lenses (Johnson, Scholes and Whittington) for viewing and understanding strategy and strategic management.[3] In the 60's and 70's the highly Rational Approach to corporate planning was popular even though writers were challenging rational decision models as unrealistic because of the impossibility of carrying out a full analysis of all relevant factors. In JS&W's terms this approach sees strategy as design. Subsequently there was a lot of research aimed at establishing evidence for the likely outcomes of business decisions about products, markets and structures. At the same time writers argued that strategic decisions were heavily influenced by experience, politics, culture and history. In JS&W's terms this approach sees strategy as experience. In the 80s economic thinking led to the influential work of Porter on competitive advantage and the emergence of the resource-based view of the firm. More recent ideas have focussed on the concept of the organisation as an organism, adapting to environmental forces through processes of social interaction that promote innovation and change. In JS&W's terms this approach sees strategy as ideas. Each of the approaches above has something to offer in understanding of what strategy is and what it is for. JS&W suggest that they can be summarised into three lenses through which strategy may be examined. THE STRATEGY LENSES New Ideas / Innovations Or another way to look at it is:Ideas
Design
Experience Conformity Analysis & Control
Strategy as Design Seen as a rational, top-down process by which senior managers analyse and evaluate constraints and forces in order to establish a clear and rational course of strategic action. Tends to lead to over-emphasis is on control. Assumptions: managers are rational decision-makers problems facing the org are susceptible to rational analysis there are clear objectives strategy is exclusively management's responsibility Strategy as Experience This view sees strategy as an adaptation and extention of what has worked in the past. How we do things around here. Culture and history strongly influence strategic thinking and choices. Strategies are likely to develop incrementally. Another feature of this view is that strategies are as likely to emerge from intermediate and lower
Page 4 of 45
09/12/2011

levels of the organisational hierarchy as they are to be decided at its apex. Disadvantages: too busy looking at the past instead of the now or future tends to develop an incremental momentum Strategy as Ideas Strategy emerges from within and around the organisation as a response to changing environment. This approach emphasises innovation and the need for diversity of ideas. The role of senior managers must create the conditions in which new ideas can emerge and the best ones can survive & thrive. Important Features: Avoidance of either the design approach or the experience approach In either case innovation is unlikely and the result is strategic drift Culturally, questioning and challenge are more valuable than consensus The Rational Model predates any of the lenses. It is the traditional view of strategic development. It resembles strategy as design. Main Features: Intended strategies develop systematically Strategy viewed as achievement of objectives Formal documented process Senior management led Multi level approach i.e. Corporate, Business, Functional
f) Explore the scope of business analysis and its relationship to strategy and strategic management in the context of the relational diagram of this syllabus.[3] Given the above discussion of business planning, how are we to understand the P3 syllabus? The examiner has emphasised the following aspects. The P3 syllabus has two main perspectives: The external forces that shape the environment of an organisation: the behaviour of customers the initiatives of competitors the emergence of new laws and regulations. The internal ambitions and concerns that exist within an organisation: the desire for growth the design of processes
Page 5 of 45
09/12/2011

the quality of products and services the competences of employees the financial resources. Three levels The P3 syllabus can be understood as functioning on three levels, as shown in the following relational diagram of main capabilities:
Strategic Position (A)
Strategic Choices (B)
Strategic Action(C)
Business Process Change
Information Technology (E)
Quality Issues (F)
Project Management
Financial Analysis (H)
People (I)
Top layer strategic analysis, choice and action The top layer of the relational model reflects a largely external and strategic perspective of business analysis. It is more concerned with the long term direction and scope of an organisation: Key aspects scanning the changing business environment looking to use the resources and competences of the organisationto achieve competitive advantage fulfilling the expectations of stakeholders. Middle layer implementation The middle layer is an expansion of the implementation of strategy. Understanding the strategic position of an organisation and considering the strategic choices open to it are of little value unless the preferred strategies can be turned into organisational action. The middle layer should be perceived as both the implementation of strategy handed down from above, and the source of emergent strategies as employees go about their daily tasks. Key aspects process redesign and automation. information technology and ebusiness. Quality assurance, control and initiatives. These three elements are interconnected. For example, many process redesign initiatives use information technology to achieve improvements in product or service quality. Process and quality initiatives have been significant in organisations for a very long time. Information technology has less of a pedigree but its impact on ebusiness may yet make this the most influential element in the syllabus. Other aspects Project management All three elements in the middle layer require effective project management
Page 6 of 45
09/12/2011

Financial aspects Finally, strategic position, choices and implementation are all subject to financial benchmarks Financial analysis explicitly recognises the importance of focussing on the key ratios and measures that may be used to assess the position of an organisation, the viability of a selected strategy and the monitoring and measuring of its success. This is very important one suspects that many managers can come up with suitable, acceptable strategies that are not financially feasible! Bottom layer HR implications Successful strategies require effective recruitment, training, motivation and organisation of people. Business analysis is presented in the syllabus in three interrelated layers. It is important that candidates for the examination appreciate the links and connections between the parts. The syllabus encourages, as far as it can, a systems perspective of an organisation. It encourages the notion that it may only be possible to understand any complex system, such as an organisation, by considering the whole of it, rather than focusing on any one individual part. 2. Environmental issues affecting the strategic position of an organisation a) Assess the macro-environment of an organisation using PESTEL.[3] It's an open system. The org affects the environment and it affects the org. BASIS OF ANALYSIS PESTEL Key Drivers of Change Scenarios
Macro-environment
Industry or Sector Competitors and Markets

The Organisation
Porters Five Forces Cycles of Competition
Strategic Groups Market Segments Critical Success Factors
The environmental influences affecting an organisation do not come in neatly labelled packages; there are complex interactions between the elements and you must always try to understand the broader picture when you are thinking about the environment. The layers and the elements within them all interact with one another. The nature of the environment must be understood in strategic planning. The greater the uncertainty the greater the strategic challenge.
The greater number of markets the more influences of change there are
Degree of change in the environment
Page 7 of 45
09/12/2011

The amount of knowedge required So: What Can Change? Firms which can predict demand face a stable environment. So: How Likely Is It To Change?
PESTEL analysis looks at the external environment and how it might affect an organisation. Use the headings as a checklist to ensure all influences have been evaluated. It identifies long term drivers of change. Consider whether factors affect the organisation either positively (opportunities) or negatively (threats). Always ask 'So What'? And look at the combined effect of some of the PESTEL factors, rather than separately. P E S T E L olitical (Public policy on competition and consumer protection but also wars etc.) conomic (Inflation, tax levels, govt. spending, x rates, interest rates etc.) ocio/cultural (demographics, household size, wealth, culture etc.) echnolical (e-marketing, process automation, communications etc.) nvironmental (Resource inputs, logistics, govt. protection policy, green issues etc) egal (contract, tort, agency, company law, employment law, tax law etc.)
b) Highlight the key drivers of change likely to affect the structure of a sector or market.[3] JS&W say that there are a number of things going on in the world currently that are affecting industries. These key drivers of change are:Market globalisation - can have customers anywhere (eg. selling via internet) Cost globalisation - can have suppliers anywhere (decreasing costs and increasing competition) Government policy - some promote free trade and some intoduce barriers to protect internal industries Global competition - can have rivals anywhere which poses massive threat c) Explore, using Porters Diamond, the influence of national competitiveness on the strategic position of an organisation.[2] A firm's strategy is closely linked to development, opportunities and contraints in the domestic market. Only if domestic conditions are appropriate will the firm be able to act globally. For a firm to be successful, it needs to have the attributes and relationships shown in Porter's Diamond.
Note! The diamond look's at the conditions of a country not the firm! Factor Conditions = human resources, physical resources, knowledge, capital, infrastructure They can be classified as basic - passively inherited/created through modest investment eg.
Page 8 of 45
09/12/2011

climate, minerals, availability of land. Or advanced - created through sustained investment (usually by govt.) eg. roads, telecoms, higher education. Countries that had factor disadvantages were forced to innovate to oversome these problems. Eg. Japan is small and overpopulated. It invented JIT! They are world leaders in the car industry. Note! An abundance of factors does not quarantee success. It is the efficiency with which they are deployed. Eg. USSR
Demand Conditions = must have a strong home market demand for the service because the home market determines how firms perceive, interpret and respond to buyer needs. Compliant home markets do not force the industry to become innovative or achieve excellence. Egs. Sophisticated and demanding buyers set standards. If consumer needs are expressed in the home market earlier than inthe world market, the firm benefits from this experience. Early saturation of the home market drives the need to export. Related & Supporting Industries = competitive success in one industry is linked to success in related industries. Eg. Sweden is a leader in paper. Why? It has lots of forests and wood. When supporting industries are highly competitive costs are reduced and innovation increases. Porter believes that clustering is key to national competitive advantage. A cluster is a linking of industries through relationships which are either: Vertical (buyer - supplier) Horizontal (common customers, technology, skills) egs. UK financial services is clustered in London and US hi-tech electronics industry is clustered in Silicon Valley Firm Strategy, Structure & Rivalry = Nations are likely to display competitive advantage in industries that are culturally suited to their normal management practices and industrial structures. Eg. Germans are good at engineering and products demanding careful development and complex manaufacturing processes. They are not that good at intangibles like fashion and entertainment. conditions in the home nation governing how firms are created, organised and managed and the nature of domestic rivalry. Includes: Cultural Considerations eg. Italy & Fashion. Germany & Engineering Structure of Ownership (in Germany and Switzerland banks are main source of capital) Extent of Domestic Rivalry (intense competition encourages innovation & excellence) Influencing the Diamond i.e. How does a Country Create a Diamond of Competitive Advantage? Governments can influence the diamond by investing in advanced factor conditions, encouraging clustering, encouraging rivalry (anti trust). Governments do not compete. Only firms compete. Governments can influence the context in which an industry operates and can create opportunities and pressures for innovation. Egs. education, tax incentives, investment in infrastructure etc. d) Prepare scenarios reflecting different assumptions about the future environment of an organisation.[3]
Page 9 of 45
09/12/2011

Past may not be a good indicator of the future. In dynamic or complex conditions more sophisticated techniques should be used, like: - Leading indicators - these indicators change before the market changes eg. change in birth rates could predict a change in demand - Scenario building - firms attempt to model the future using this technique Scenarios are detailed & plausible views of how the business environment of an organisation might develop in the future based on groupings of key environmental influences and 'drivers of change', which have the potential to have a significant impact on the company & are associated with high levels of uncertainty. For each scenario the strategic managers will consider how their organisation would be affected & what the most appropriate strategies would be in those circumstances. Development of scenarios enables managers to sharefuture assumptions about the & the key variables shaping that future. Steps in Scenario Planning 1) Identify key assumptions or forces, driver's of change (note: using PESTEL) 2) Write the scenarios (optimistic, pessimistic, most likely) 3) Develop strategies for each scenario 4) Monitor the environment to see how it is actually unfolding e) Evaluate methods of business forecasting used when quantitatively assessing the likely outcome of different business strategies.[3] Forecasting attempts to reduce the uncertainty manager face. In simple and static conditions, the past is a relatively good guide to the future, though, of course, this is not the case in dynamic or complex conditions. There are two methods used for forecasting: Time series analysis - uses past data to distinguish seasonal/cyclical flucuations from long term underlying trends. For eg. monthly inflation statistics Regression analysis - is a technique to check any underlying correlations between two variables (eg. sales of ice cream and weather). The relationship between the two variables may only hold between certain values (eg. ice cream sales go up as the weather gets hotter but there are only so many ice creams a person can consume no matter how hot it is). 3. Competitive forces affecting an organisation a) Discuss the significance of industry, sector and convergence.[3] The PESTEL influences may effect every industry, but industries will vary in how much they are affected. For example, an interest rate rise is likely to affect a business selling cars (car purchase can be postponed) more than it will affect a supermarket (food purchase cannot be postponed). More detailed analysis of the environment and competitive forces will be focused on specific industries. An industry is a group of firms selling the same principal product, or products which are close substitutes. A sector extends the idea of industry into the public services. However, the boundaries of an industry or sector can change through the convergence of previously
Page 10 of 45
09/12/2011

separate industries. Convergence can be analysed in terms of whether it is supply led or demand (market) led and also whether there is convergence in substitutes or convergence in complements, e.g. products/services that complement each other. Supplyled, where producers try to see connections between separate industries or sectors, e.g. supermarkets offering retail banking. Marketled, where buyers see or want connections between separate industries or sectors, e.g. customers in a book store also wanting to browse CDs and DVDs. Convergence in substitutes, where one technology can replace another, e.g. mobile phones and landline phones. Convergence in complements, where two technologies work better together, e.g. Panasonic (electronics) and Leica (lenses) producing digital cameras. b) Evaluate the sources of competition in an industry or sector using Porters five forces framework.[3] Michael Porter (Competitive Strategy) identified five factors or forces that determine the strength and nature of competition in an industry or market. These are depicted in the diagram below:
This model examines the role of 5 forces close to an organisation that impact on its ability to make a profit and hence how attractive a particular market or industry is. The 5 forces are as follows: 1. Threat of substitute products If there are a lot of substitutes, a customer will be more likely to switch rather than stay with a product when there are price rises. There are 3 main kinds of substitute: Direct - buys same product different manufacturer eg. buy pepsi instead of coke Indirect - buys from different industry eg. buy mineral water instead of coke Monetary - associated with luxury products. Different industries competing for the same part of customer's income eg. luxury car or luxury family holiday i.e. you can buy one or the other, not both. Suppliers of different industries are competing the the same discretionary income of the customer. 2. Competitive rivalry If there is a lot of rivalry in an industry then profit margins will be lower as companies constantly
Page 11 of 45
09/12/2011

fight to retain their customers. There will tend to be higher rivalry (& lower profits) when: Market growth is slow (eg. mobile phone networks & market saturation) If capacity can only be increased in large amounts If it is difficult to exit the industry (eg. airlines) 3. Threat of new entrants New entrants always drive down profit margins (as companies have to spend more on marketing or lower prices to keep customers). New competitors are only kept out by barriers to entry. These barriers include: High fixed costs High capital requirements Switching costs Access to distribution channels 4. Power of customers Powerful customers prevent companies from putting prices up or implementing other changes to to meet business objectives i.e. increase profits. Customers will be powerful if; Size of the customer relative to the firm's customer base Availability of substitute products - gives customers lots of choice Customer makes low profits 5. Power of suppliers Powerful suppliers might put their prices up or impose other changes on the company. Eg. oil companies and airlines or gold suppliers and jewellers. Suppliers will be powerful if; There is high switching costs Suppliers' product is necessary to the business and is differentiated from other suppliers Some of the above might apply to an entire industry; some might apply to one company. For example when looking at how powerful suppliers are in the airline industry; Oil companies are powerful suppliers for all airlines since all airlines use a lot of fuel Staff are more powerful in airlines such as British Airways than in Ryanair Example 1 The Five Forces model can be used to analyse the market for legal services (the services of firms of solicitors) in a local area, where competition is between small and medium-sized firms. Threat from potential entrants. This is likely to be fairly low. New entrants must be qualified solicitors, and it could take time to establish a sufficiently large client base. Suppliers bargaining power. Solicitors have no significant suppliers; therefore the bargaining power of suppliers is non-existent. Customers bargaining power. Most firms of solicitors have a fairly large number of customers. Customers need legal services. The bargaining power of customers is probably low. Threat from substitutes. There are no substitutes for legal services, except perhaps for some do-it-yourself legal work. Competitive rivalry. This is likely to be very weak. Firms of competitors will not usually seek to compete with other firms by offering lower fees.
Page 12 of 45
09/12/2011

The conclusion is that competition in the market for legal services in a local region is very weak. Example 2 The Five Forces model can be used to analyse the competition for Amazon, the company that supplies books, CDs and DVDs through online ordering on its website. It has no direct competitor. Threat from potential entrants. This is likely to be fairly low, because of the costs of establishing a selling and distribution system and the time it might take a new competitor to create brand awareness. Suppliers bargaining power. Amazon obtains its books and other products from a large number of different suppliers. The bargaining power of most suppliers is therefore likely to be weak, with suppliers needing Amazon more than Amazon needs individual suppliers. Customers bargaining power. Amazon has a very large customer base, and the bargaining power of customers is non-existent. Threat from substitutes. Substitutes are bookshops, shops selling CDs and DVDs, internet downloads of films and music, and possibly eBay and other online auction sites as a channel for selling second-hand books. In the longer term electronic books might be another substitute. Competitive rivalry. Amazon has no direct competitor. In conclusion, the major competition in the market served by Amazon is probably the threat from substitute products. c) Assess the contribution of the lifecycle model, the cycle of competition and associated costing implications to understanding competitive behaviour.[3] A life cycle is the period from birth or creation of an item to the end of its life. Products, companies and industries all have life cycles. A product life cycle begins with its initial development and ends at the time that it is eventually withdrawn from the market at the end of its life. It is important in exam questions that you recognise the appropriate lifecycle stage and discuss the implications within the context of the scenario. A life cycle is said to go through several stages. The classical life cycle for a product, or even an entire industry, goes through four stages or phases:
0.00
Page 13 of 45
09/12/2011

Introduction phase. During this stage of a product life cycle, there is some sales demand but total sales are low. Firms that make and sell the product incur investment costs, and start-up costs and running costs are high. The product is not yet profitable. Growth phase. During the growth phase, total sales demand in the market grows at a faster rate. New entrants are attracted into the market by the prospect of high sales and profits. At an early stage during the growth phase, companies in the market begin to earn profits. Maturity phase. During the maturity phase, total annual sales remain fairly stable. Prices and profits stabilise. The opportunity for more growth no longer exists, although the life of the product might be extended, through product updates. More companies might seek to improve profits by differentiating their products more from those of competitors, and selling to a niche market segment. Decline phase. Eventually, total annual sales in the market will start to fall. As sales fall, so too do profits. Companies gradually leave the market. At some point in time, it is no longer possible to produce and sell the product at a profit, and the product is therefore discontinued by the last of the companies that makes it. Not all products have a classical life cycle. Unsuccessful products never become profitable. A business entity might be able to revitalise and redesign a product, so that when it enters a decline phase, its sales can be increased again, and it goes into another period of growth and maturity. The length of a product life cycle can be long or short. A broad type of product, such as a motor car, has a longer life cycle than particular types of the product, such as a Volkswagen Beetle or a Ford Escort. Relevance of the product life cycle to strategic management Strategic management should consider the cash flows and profitability of a product over its entire life cycle. When a decision is being made about whether or not to develop a new product, management should consider the likely sales and returns over the entire life cycle. For existing products, management need to assess the position of a product in its life cycle, and what the future prospects for the product, in terms of profits and cash returns, might be. Timing market entry and market exit The product life cycle concept might help companies to make strategic decisions about when to enter a market and when to leave it. Entrepreneurial companies might look for opportunities to enter a new market during the introductory phase, in the expectation that the product will become successful and the company will win a large share of the market by being one of the first companies to enter it. More cautious companies, looking for growth opportunities, might delay their entry into the market until the growth phase, when the product is already making a profit for its producers. Companies are unlikely to enter a market during the maturity phase unless they see growth opportunities in a particular part of the market, or unless the costs of entry into the market are low. A company might need to make a strategic decision about leaving a market, when the product is in its decline phase. It should be possible to make profits in a declining market, but better growth opportunities might exist in other
Page 14 of 45
09/12/2011

markets and a company might benefit from a change in its strategic direction. Life cycle analysis as a technique for competition analysis Life cycle analysis is also useful for assessing strategic position and the nature of competition in a market. The number of competitors in the market now, and the number of competitors that might exist in the future, will be influenced by the phase that the product has reached during its life cycle. Cycle of competition A cycle of competition is another concept for understanding the behaviour of competitors in a market. When one company achieves some success in a market, competitors might try to do something even better in order to gain a competitive advantage. A new initiative by one company will result in a counter-measure from another company. Each company in the market tries to do something different and better. A typical cycle of competition affects prices and quality. If one company has a large share of a profitable market, a rival company might start to sell its product at a lower price. Another rival company might improve the quality of its product, but sell it at the same price as rivals in the market. The first company might respond to these initiatives by its rivals by improving its product quality and reducing the selling price. The effect of a cycle of competition in a growing market is that prices fall and quality might improve. In the maturity phase of a products life cycle, or in the decline phase, it becomes more difficult to lower prices without reducing quality. Competitors might try to gain a bigger share of the market by selling at a lower price, but the product quality might be reduced. This can lead to a spiral of falling prices and falling quality, to the point where the product is no longer profitable, and it is less attractive to customers. The concept of the cycle of competition is useful for strategic analysis, because it can help to explain the strategies of companies in a market, and to assess what future initiatives by competitors might be. Example Products and raw materials related to solar energy are now in a strong growth phase of their life cycle, due to growing demand. World-wide annual sales of global solar equipment were $20 billion in 2006 and were forecast to increase to $90 billion by 2010. Annual production of the high-purity silicon required to make solar cells was forecast to increase ten-fold by 2015. With the growth in demand, the price of silicon rose sharply. At this stage of the life cycle of solar energy equipment products, companies still felt able to charge high prices, in spite of falling costs. Profit margins were therefore very high. As the market develops and grows, it is likely that this situation will change, as more competitors enter the market. d) Analyse the influence of strategic groups and market segmentation.[3] Five forces analysis deals with the competitive environment in broad industry-wide terms. It is possible to refine this by considering strategic groups. These are made up of organisations with similar strategic characteristics, following similar strategies or competing on similar bases. Such groups arise for a variety of reasons, such as barriers to entry or the attractiveness of particular market segments. When there are only a few competitors in the same industry, the concept of strategic groups has no practical value, because each competitor can be analysed individually. However, when there are many competitors in the
Page 15 of 45
09/12/2011

industry, it can simplify the analysis to put them into strategic groups of entities with similar resources and similar strategies. For the purpose of competitor analysis, all the entities in the same strategic group can then be treated as if they are a single competitor. Instead of analysing each competitor individually, they can be analysed collectively, in groups. Eg. The soup industry has national brands (such as Heinz, Baxters, Campbells) price leaders, own label suppliers (such as the major supermarkets) and smaller, premium brands selling high quality chilled soups.
Strategic Space Pertains to a strategic group and is defined by two or three common strategic characteristics. Here are some examples of such characteristics. Product diversity Geographical coverage Extent of branding Pricing policy Product quality Distribution method Target market segment
A series of 2-axis maps may be drawn using selected pairs of these characteristics to define both the extent of the strategic space and any unfilled gaps that exist within it. (A similar technique is used for specific products and is illustrated later in this chapter: this is product positioning.) The identification of potential competitive advantage is the reason for analysing strategic groups. It improves knowledge of competitors and shows gaps in the organisation's current segments of operations. It may also reveal opportunities for migration to more favourable segments. Strategic problems may also be revealed. One way of identifying strategic groups within an entire market is to classify market position in terms of price and quality. Some firms will offer lower-priced products, but their equality is probably not as good. Other firms might offer higher-quality products for a higher price. The strategic groups in a market might be mapped according to price and quality as follows:
This map indicates that there are four strategic groups, each in a different market position in relation to price and quality. The largest group, Group 2, sells products with a middle-range price and middle-range quality. This method of analysis can help an entity to identify possible gaps in the market strategic space. When there is
Page 16 of 45
09/12/2011

a perceived gap in the market, an entity might decide on a strategy of filling the empty space by offering a product with the characteristics that are needed to fill the gap. If the positioning of entities in a market is analysed by price and quality, as above, possible strategic spaces might be identified as follows:
In this example, an entity might decide to target a position in the market where it sells a high-quality product for a low price, because there are no firms yet in this part of the market. Alternatively, there might be a market for even higher-quality products at an even higher price. Market segmentation A business entity might try to sell its products to all customers in the market. For example, manufacturers of sugar might try to sell their product or products to all customers in the market who buy sugar. Similarly, distributors of petrol (car fuel) might try to sell their products to all car drivers/buyers of petrol. However, a business entity might choose instead to target its products at a particular section or segment of the market. A market segment is a section of the total market in which the potential customers have certain unique and identifiable characteristics and needs. Instead of trying to sell to all customers in the entire market, an entity might develop products or services that are designed to appeal to customers in a specific market segment. Market segmentation is the process of dividing the market into separate segments, for the purpose of developing differing products for each segment. Market segmentation and strategic space A similar analysis of strategic groups can be made to identify possible target market segments. In the example below, the strategic groups are analysed by life style of customers.
Page 17 of 45
09/12/2011
This analysis suggests that there are possibly gaps in the market for a product, and that a product is not currently being made and sold that might appeal specifically to individuals whose children have left home or to individuals who have retired from working. Having analysed the market and identified these strategic spaces, management can go on to assess whether a strategy based on developing an amended product specifically for these gaps in the market might be strategically desirable and financially worthwhile. Identifying gaps in a market can be a particularly useful method of competition analysis for companies that are considering whether or not to enter into a market for the first time. e) Determine the opportunities and threats posed by the environment of an organisation.[2] This chapter has looked at a number of tools (or models) that can be used to help to make sense of the environment: PESTEL Porters diamond Convergence in industries Porters five forces The life cycle model The influence of strategic groups The influence of market segmentation. The results of these analyses can be classified as either an: opportunity or a threat. Once categorised as an opportunity or threat the influences first need to be: prioritised, e.g. some will be much more important than others. Then the organisation has to decide how to: grab the best opportunities defend against the most serious threats. There is absolutely no point in identifying opportunities and threats, but do nothing about them. Identifying opportunities and threats If you are asked to apply SWOT analysis to a case study or scenario in an examination question, part of your analysis will be the identification of opportunities and threats. The following approach is recommended. Opportunities and threats might exist because of changes, or possible changes, in the business environment. They might also exist because of the nature of competition in the market or the existence of a strategic space.
Page 18 of 45
09/12/2011

To identify opportunities and threats in the business environment, you should consider each aspect of the business environment. PESTEL analysis provides a useful framework. However, whereas PESTEL analysis is used to identify significant factors in the environment, SWOT analysis is used to assess these factors and consider how they might create an opportunity or a threat for the entity. Also consider Porter's Diamond. Are conditions favourable within the country for the organisation to make a profit? Is there industry convergence? You should then consider the competitive environment. 1. What is the strength of the competition? You should consider the Five Forces model. Are any of the Five Forces likely to change in the future, and if so, how might they change? What effect could this have on the nature of competition (and profitability in the market)? 2. Does the life cycle model offer a useful insight into the market and competition? Is the market in its introductory phase, its growth phase, its maturity phase or its decline phase? Is it likely to move from one phase to the other? If so what might be the consequences for the business? 3. What are the strategic groups? Is there a strategic space within this group? Is there market convergence considerations? 4. Is the market segmented? What are the existing market segments? Are there gaps in the market, and opportunities for developing new segments? If the market is not segmented now, might it become segmented in the future, and if so what might those market segments be? Is there an opportunity to create a new market segment? Opportunities should be seen in terms of circumstances (or changes in the environment or in competition) that can be used to increase competitive advantage. Threats should be seen as circumstances (or changes in the environment or in competition) that will weaken or remove a competitive advantage, or that could give competitors a competitive advantage over you. Example There is intense public concern about global warming and the effect on the worlds climate of carbon emissions into the atmosphere. This concern is growing. It is recognised that the consumption of oil products could be having a major impact on the world climate. The known reserves of oil and natural gas in the world are falling. Consumption is exceeding discoveries of new reserves. Many of the known reserves are in politically unstable countries. New technology is being developed for the production of fuel out of corn. Corn can be converted into ethanol (a bio-fuel) and cars are now being manufactured that will run on ethanol. However, the technology is in a very early stage of development. The US government has set a formal target for the production of bio-fuels. The European Union also announced that a minimum of 10% of transport fuel consumed in the EU by 2020 should come from bio-fuels. You work for a company that specialises in commodity trading. It buys and sells a range of agricultural products such as corn. At the moment, its purchases of corn are resold mainly to food manufacturers. Most of its suppliers are in North America. Required Identify opportunities and threats that appear to exist for your company, over the next five years or so.
Page 19 of 45
09/12/2011

Answer There is no correct answer. Strategic managers need to identify threats and opportunities in the environment and the competitive market, but opinions can vary. PESTEL analysis There is growing public concern for the environment. Attitudes are changing, and over time it is probable that attitudes towards the consumption of oil products will become more hostile. At the same time, public support for the use of bio-fuels might grow significantly. Changes to the ecology and social attitudes have already had an impact on political thinking in the US and EU. Formal targets have been set for the production of biofuels. Over time, these formal targets might become laws or regulations. The current situation indicates that over the next ten years, there will be a significant shift towards the consumption of bio-fuels. World demand for the raw materials corn will therefore increase, and this means that the total amount of land used for the production of corn will also increase. It is very likely that the increase in demand for corn will exceed the increase in supply, and prices will rise. Opportunities for making profits in agriculture and related industries should increase. These changes offer opportunities to the commodity trading company. There will be more customers wanting to buy corn. More agricultural producers will make corn. There is an opportunity to develop the companys business by finding the new customers and new suppliers. There is also a threat, because competitors will want to do the same thing. There might also be an opportunity for the company to become involved in trading in ethanol and other bio-fuels. There is a problem with technology. It is not yet clear how successful the technology for producing ethanol will be. Improvements will be needed, and it is possible that other methods of producing bio-fuels, using other natural products, might become more successful. Competitor analysis If the above analysis is correct, the market for ethanol is at an introductory phase of the product life cycle. Demand for ethanol and corn will increase substantially. Trading in these products will also increase. If profits from trading increase, new competitors are likely to enter the market. Five Forces analysis might suggest that competition in the market for trading corn will intensify. This is partly because of the threat from new entrants, and (probably) an increase in competitive rivalry amongst firms that are in the market already. As the demand for corn increases, demand will exceed supply (for some years at least) and the bargaining power of suppliers will increase. The probability of increasing competition might be seen as a threat. There might be a segmentation of the market for corn and other grain products in the future, with the market dividing between users of corn for fuel production and users of corn for food manufacture. There might be an opportunity for the company to specialise in selling corn to one type of customer, offering specialist knowledge of their particular requirements as a feature of its service (to give the company a competitive advantage over its non-specialist rivals). Summary
Page 20 of 45
09/12/2011

You might agree or disagree with this analysis. The main point to understand, however, is how to use PESTEL analysis and competition analysis to identify opportunities or threats that an entity will be faced with in the future.
4. Marketing and the value of goods and services a) Analyse customers and markets[2] Markets can be defined by their customers and potential customers. A key aspect of strategy development is the identification of, and then meeting of, customer needs. What are customer needs? Customers buy products or services for a reason. When they can choose between two or more competing products, there is a reason why they choose one product instead of another. A major factor in the decision to buy a product is usually price. Many customers choose the product that is the cheapest on offer, particularly when they cannot see any significant difference between the competing products.
Page 21 of 45
09/12/2011

If the buying decision is not based entirely on price, the customer must have other needs that the product or service provides. These could be: a better-quality product better design features availability: not having to wait to obtain the product convenience of purchase the influence of advertising or sales promotions. As a general rule, the needs of different types of customer vary. Industrial and commercial customers are more likely than consumers to be influenced by price. Consumers will often pay more for a branded product (due to the influence of advertising) or for convenience. Customer analysis A customer may be an organisation, such as a hospital or government agency a business firm, such as a distributor or manufacturer or an individual consumer. There are three sets of strategic questions that are used to analyse customers segmentation, motivation and unmet needs. Segmentation sets of strategic questions include the following. Who are the biggest, most profitable existing customers and who are the most attractive potential customers? Do the customers fall into any logical groups on the basis of characteristics, needs or motivations? Can the market be segmented into groups requiring a unique business strategy? Motivation concerns the customers selection and use of their favourite brands, the elements of the product or service that they value most, the customers objectives and the changes that are occurring in customer motivation. Unmet needs considers why some customers are dissatisfied and some are changing brands or suppliers. The analysis looks at the needs not being met that the customer is aware of. Marketing The marketing function aims to satisfy customer needs profitably through an appropriate marketing mix. Each market segment can become a target market and would require a unique marketing mix for the organisation to exploit it properly. The marketing mix is the set of controllable variables that the firm can use to influence the buyers responses (Kotler). The 4Ps of the marketing mix The marketing approach is to identify customer needs and try to meet customer needs more successfully than competitors. To do this, business entities need to offer provide a mix of the four Ps that will appeal to customers. The 4Ps are: Product Price Promotion. Place
Page 22 of 45
09/12/2011

PRODUCT Brand name Packaging Features Options Quality Warranty Service Style appeal PRICE Level Discounts Allowances Payment terms Delivery options PROMOTION Sales promotion Personal selling Publicity Advertising PLACE Distribution channels channels Distribution coverage coverage Outlet locations Sales territories Inventory levels Inventory locations
Marketing can be analysed at a tactical level, and decisions about the marketing mix might be included within the annual marketing budget. However, marketing issues can also be analysed at a strategic level. It is important in strategic analysis to understand what customers will want to buy, and why some products or services will be more successful than others. b) Establish appropriate critical success factors (CSF) and key performance indicators (KPI) for products and services[2] Critical success factors (CSFs) are factors that are essential to the strategic success of a business entity or a product or a service. They have been defined as: those components of strategy in which the organisation must excel to out-perform competition (Johnson and Scholes). CSFs of a product or service are the features that the product must have if it is to be a success with customers. The CSFs of a product or service must be related to customer needs. They are the features of a product or service that will have the main influence on the decisions by customers to buy it. Example A parcel delivery service (such as DHL or FedEx) might identify critical success factors as: collecting parcels from customers quickly, as soon as possible after the customer has asked for a parcel to be delivered providing rapid and reliable delivery. Example The senior management of a company that manufactures sports cars, competing with producers such as Ferrari and Maserati, need to understand the critical factors that enable their products to compete successfully in the market. After an analysis of the market and competition, they might decide that the CSFs are: building cars that match competitors in performance (top speeds, acceleration, engine capacity), and also sell at prices that are about 10% less than those of the main competitors. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) measure the performance of the CSFs. c) Explore the role of the value chain in creating and sustaining competitive advantage.[2]
Page 23 of 45
09/12/2011

Once CSFs have been identified, the firm needs to analyse whether and where it is adding value (as perceived by customers) to products. Porter developed the value chain to help identify which activities within the firm were contributing to a competitive advantage and which were not. The approach involves breaking down the firm into five primary and four support activities, and then looking at each to see if they give a cost advantage or quality advantage.
Adding value Strategic management should look for ways of adding value, because this improves competitiveness (creates competitive advantage). Management should look for ways of adding more value at each stage in the primary value chain. Similarly, management should consider ways in which support activities can add more value. Finding ways of adding value is a key aspect of strategic management. Answers need to be provided to a few basic questions: Who is the customer? What features of the product or service do they value? How do we provide value to the customer in the products or services we provide? How can we add to the value that the customer receives? How can we add value more successfully than our competitors? Do we have some core competencies that we can use to give us a competitive advantage? Methods of adding value There are different ways of adding value. There is an important link between value and CSFs for products/services. One way of adding value is to alter a product design, and include features that might meet the needs of a particular type of customer better than products that are currently in the market. A product might be designed with added features. Market segmentation is successful when a group of customers value particular product characteristics, and are willing to pay more for a product that provides
Page 24 of 45
09/12/2011

them. Value can be added by making it easier for the customer to buy a product, for example by providing a website where customers can make purchases. Bookstores can add value to the books they sell by providing sales outlets at places where customers often want to buy books, such as airport terminals. Value can be added by promoting a brand name. Successful branding might give customers a sense of buying products or services with a better quality. Value can be added by delivering a service or product more quickly. For example, a private hospital might add value by offering treatment to patients more quickly than other hospitals in the region. Value can also come from providing a reliable service, so that customers know that they will receive the service on time, at the promised time, to a good standard of performance.
Value creation and strategic management By adding value more successfully, a firm will improve its profitability, by reducing costs or improving sales. Some of the extra benefit might be passed on to the customer, in the form of a better-quality product or service or a lower selling price. If so, the business entity shares the benefits of added value with the customers, and gains additional competitive advantage. Added value does not have to be given immediately to customers (in the form of lower prices) or shareholders (in the form of higher dividends). The benefits can be re-invested to create more competitive advantage in the future. There is a link between: corporate strategy, which should aim to add value for the customer financial strategy, which should aim to add value for the shareholders and investment strategy, which should aim to ensure that the entity will continue to add more value in the future. Using value chain analysis The value chain model is another useful model for business strategy analysis. It can be argued that in business, the most important objective for success should be to add value better than competitors. Creating value for customers will, over the long term, create more value for shareholders. Since adding value is critical to the success of a business entity, it should be important to identify how it creates value, where it is creating value and whether it could do better (and create more value). The entitys success in creating value can be compared with the performance of competitors. Who is doing better to create value for customers? In your examination, the value chain model can be used to make a strategic assessment of performance. Each part of the primary value chain and each of the secondary value chain activities should be analysed. For each part of the value chain, providing answers to the following questions can assess performance: 1. How is value added by this part of the value chain? 2. Has the entity been successful in adding value in this part of the value chain? 3. Has the entity been more successful than its competitors in adding value in this part of the value chain? 4. Has there been a failure to add value successfully? 5. Does the entity have the core competencies in this part of the value chain to add value successfully? (If not, a decision might be taken to out-source the activities.)
Page 25 of 45
09/12/2011

d) Advise on the role and influence of value networks.[3] Difference between a value chain and a value network There is a value chain within every business entity. There is also a supply chain from the producers of raw materials and equipment through to the entities that sell the end consumer product to customers. For example, food products might go from the original food producer to a food processor (who makes the processed food item) to a retailer. Here, there are three firms in the supply chain from the original food source to the end consumer. Each firm in the supply chain has its own value chain. A value network, also called a value system, is the sum of the value chains in all the firms in a supply chain. The organisations value chain does not exist in isolation. There will be direct links between the inbound logistics of the firm and the outbound logistics of its suppliers, for example. An understanding of the value system and how the organisations value chain fits in to it will therefore aid in the strategic planning process. A value network is a web of relationships that generates economic value and other benefits through complex dynamic exchanges between two or more individuals, groups or organisations.
The strategic significance of value networks The concept of the value network or value system has an important implication for each firm in the supply chain/value network. Value can be created (and lost) in any part of the value network. To achieve competitive advantage, it is often necessary to work with other entities in the value network in order to create extra value. The concept of a value network is particularly important for value systems that do not consist of a simple chain of suppliers from raw materials through to finished products. It is very useful, for example, in many service industries where securing and retaining customers or suppliers depends on the activities of other entities. An entity should try to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of its own activities in creating value within its own value chain. However, it should also consider the entire value network, and think about how value might be added across the network, not just within its own internal value chain. A value network must operate with the efficiency and effectiveness of a selfcontained individual entity. To do this, it is necessary to manage relationships with other entities in the network.
Page 26 of 45
09/12/2011

Illustration Amazon, for example, not only revolutionised the business model for selling books, but also formed an entire new value network of suppliers and buyers that redefined the value chain for acquiring books and music. Replacing the retail bookstore with a website and the over the counter delivery process with FedEx and UPS delivery created a new value network that delivered customer convenience and an entirely different and lowercost business model. e) Assess different approaches to benchmarking an organisations performance.[3] Benchmarking is the process of systematic comparison of a service, practice or process. Its use is to provide a target for action in order to improve competitive position. Benchmarking involves answering the questions: How do we compare? Who performs better? Why are they better? What actions do we need to take in order to improve our performance? Types of benchmarking Managers compare the performance of their products or processes externally with those of competitors and bestinclass companies and internally with other operations within their own firms that perform similar activities. There are many methods of benchmarking. Here are a few examples: Internal benchmarking. An entity might compare the performance of units within the organisation with the best-performing unit. For example, an organisation with 30 branch offices might compare the performance of 29 of the branches with the best-performing branch. Best in class benchmarking. This involves seeking outside organisations that are known to be bestinclass it provides opportunities of learning from those who are at the leading edge, although it must be remembered that not every best practice solution can be transferred to others. Customer benchmarking. This is a different type of benchmark. The benchmark is a specification of what customers expect. An entity compares its performance against what its customers expect the performance to be. Competitor benchmarking. An entity might compare its own performance and its own products with those of its most successful competitors. Unlike internal benchmarking and operational benchmarking, competitive benchmarking must be carried out without the knowledge and co-operation of the selected benchmark. Methods of competitor benchmarking There are no standard methods of competitor benchmarking. In most circumstances, competitors will not provide more information about themselves than they are required to by law or regulations. Published financial statements might therefore be an important source of comparative material, particularly where the competitor is required to publish a full set of financial statements each year that comply with international accounting standards. Some of the methods that might be used by a company to compare performance with its competitors are suggested below. The published financial statements of competitors should be studied. These should be analysed to
Page 27 of 45
09/12/2011

assess the financial performance of the competitor. Segment analysis, showing the performance of business and geographical segments, might be particularly useful.
Financial ratios obtained from the financial statements of the competitor should be compared with similar ratios for the company. In addition, trends in performance and in the ratios over time should also be monitored. Key performance measures might include: - annual sales (by business segment or geographical segment) - growth in annual sales (as a percentage increase on the previous year) - return on capital employed - net profit/sales ratio - gross profit/sales ratio. Where there are significant differences in performance, the possible reasons for the differences should be considered. The products or services of competitors should be analysed in detail. In the case of products, units of the competitors product might be purchased and taken to a laboratory for scientific or technical analysis. Information about competitors can be gathered by talking to customers and potential customers who have had dealings with a competitor, and who are willing to discuss what the competitor is offering as an incentive to make the customer buy its products. Sales prices should be compared. Some competitors might sell at higher prices and some at lower prices. Some competitors might sell a variety of similar products across a range of different prices. When there are significant price differences, management should consider whether the price differences are justified by the differences between the products or services. Dangers of benchmarking you get what you measure managers may learn to direct attention at what gets benchmarked rather than at what is important strategically Benchmarking does not always reveal the reasons for good/poor performance Managers need to be aware that a benchmarking exercise can appear to threaten staff where it appears that benchmarking is designed to identify weaknesses in individual performance rather than how the process itself can be improved. To alleviate this fear, managers need to be involved in the benchmarking exercise and provide reassurance to staff regarding the aims and objectives of benchmarking. In todays environment, the more innovative companies are less concerned with benchmarking numbers (for example, costs or productivity) than they are with focusing on the processes. If a company focuses on the processes, the numbers will eventually self correct.
5. The internal resources, capabilities and competences of an organisation
Page 28 of 45
09/12/2011

This chapter looks at how organisations can develop and sustain competitive advantage through the use of resources and competences. It ends by looking at SWOT analysis, which brings together internal and external factors to allow organisations to assess their strategic position. First let's looks a two fundamentally different approaches to strategy: position-based and resource-based. Postion-based: seeks to develop competitive advantage in a way that responds to the nature of the competitive environment: the firm positions its offering in response to the external opportunities or threats it discerns, and develops the appropriate competences and resources it needs to compete. The contrasting resource-based strategy was developed in response to two problems with the above: 1) many environments are too complex and dynamic to permit continuing effective analysis and response 2) once an opportunity is discerned and an offering made, it is very easy for competitors to make similar offerings, thus rapidly eroding competitive advantage Resource-based: sustainable competitive advantage is only attained as a result of the possession of distinctive resources. These may be physical resources, such as the effective monopolisation of diamonds by De Beers, or, more typically in today's service economies, they may be competences. So resource-based strategy focuses internally rather then externally. JS&W argue that a resource-based strategy is the more appropriate approach for most organisations to take because it is the better way of achieving a sustainable advantage, because it enables organisations to have control over the means of obtaining advantages (ie their resources). a) Discriminate between strategic capability, threshold resources, threshold competences, unique resources and core competences.[3] Strategic capability is the adequacy and suitability of the resources and competences an organisation needs if it is to survive and prosper. Note that capability refers to resources and competences and their relationship can be shown as:
Strategic capability can also be divided into threshold capabilities and capabilities for competitive advantage.
Page 29 of 45
09/12/2011

Threshold capabilities. These are the minimum capabilities needed for the organisation to be able to compete in a given market. They consist of threshold resources and threshold competences the resources and competences needed to meet customers minimum requirements. Capabilities for competitive advantage. The capabilities that allow an organisation to beat its competitors. These capabilities must meet the needs and expectations of its customers. Unique capabilities are not enough they must be valued by the customers. Unique resources are those resources that create competitive advantage and that others cannot imitate or obtain. Examples of unique resources are: brand situation, for example, near a source of raw material or a source of cheap labour sunk costs. Competitors have to cover depreciation costs right to use a patented process.
Note that if the unique resource is people based, the people can move to competitors or start their own business.
Core competences are the activities, processes and methods through which an organisation uses its resources effectively, in ways that others cannot imitate or obtain. Examples of core competences are: sophisticated IT that, for example, enables complex and accurate demand forecasting a corporate culture that fosters innovation the ability to share and lever knowledge throughout the organisation. b) Discuss from a strategic perspective, the continuing need for effective cost management and control systems within organisations.[3] Porter has argued that in order to achieve strategic capability, an entity must gain competitive advantage over its rivals, and competitive advantage can be achieved by adding value or by reducing costs. A firm must achieve a certain level of cost efficiency if it is to be able to compete and survive in the industry. Cost efficiency can be thought of as a threshold strategic capability because: customers do not value product features at any price. If the cost is too high, no sales will be made competitive rivalry will drive down prices, and hence costs, so to enter the game at all there must be a basic level of cost efficiency. Managing costs needs both resources and competences. making better use of resources or obtaining lower-cost resources, and improving competencies and capabilities (for example, improving the systems of inventory management). Sources of cost efficiency include: economies of scale experience (the learning curve)
Page 30 of 45
09/12/2011

supply and production costs product/process design. c) Discuss the capabilities required to sustain competitive advantage.[2] If strategy is to be based on strategic capabilities, those capabilities must have four qualities. 1) must be valuable to buyers 2) must be rare 3) must be robust 4) must be non-substitutable The capabilities needed to sustain competitive advantage are. Value of strategic capabilities. The strategic capability must be one that is of value to the customer. A distinctive capability is not enough: the strategic capability must be able to generate what customers value in terms of products or services. Rarity of strategic capabilities. Competitive advantage will not be attained if competitors have identical strategic capabilities. Unique or rare resources or competences are needed to allow the organisation to outperform its rivals. Robustness of strategic capabilities. Capabilities for competitive advantage should be robust, meaning that they are hard to imitate. Therefore, competitive advantage is not so often sustained through physical/tangible resources as these can be copied/acquired over time. More important is the way in which the resources are organised and deployed as these competences are, in general, more difficult to identify and imitate. d) Explain the impact of new product, process, and service developments and innovation in supporting business strategy.[2] Innovation is increasingly seen as important for strategic success. The reasons are: increased rate of technical advances increased competition increased customer expectations. In all functions that serve to produce goods and services, achieving superior innovativeness, relative to that of competitors, can help the firm to acquire new customers. Superior innovation gives a company something unique, something that its competitors lack until they are able to imitate the innovation. By the time competitors succeed in imitating the innovator, the innovating company has already built up such brand loyalty that its imitating competitors will find it difficult to attack their position. Innovation can apply to: the nature of the product or service being supplied how the product or service is produced and delivered operating the firm in a new or novel way. A successful company is one that:
Page 31 of 45
09/12/2011

is outwardlooking, has accepted the reality of constant change and reviews its product/market policy continuously is always looking to the future towards new markets, innovative products, better designs, new processes, improved quality, increased productivity has a structure designed for innovation in which management and staff are stimulated to think and act innovatively, which recognises potential intrapreneurs and ensures that everyone (particularly senior people) welcome changes for the better stimulates creativity, and rewards ideas and supports individual and team abilities.
Illustration
Amazon first appeared on the internet in 1995 selling books. It was a major innovator in the business of internet retailing and soon CDs and DVDs were added to its product lists. The website allows customers to search a very extensive database and to order goods, which would normally be delivered by post in a few days. The website also allows customers to write reviews about products, and informs customers about how consumers of a particular product also bought other products. Consumer goods such as electronics are now available from Amazon. Although Amazon is preeminent in internetbased sales of books, CDs and DVDs, innovation cannot stop and the company is spending heavily on technology that will allow customers to download books, music and video over the internet rather than having them delivered by post. The company is being forced to innovate because competitors, such as Apples iTunes, have been very successful in selling audio downloads, and have recently made movies available for downloading. Ondemand printing of books is particularly suitable for lowervolume books and those that would normally be regarded as out of print. Unless Amazon can provide downloadable material, it risks losing business to those who can rather like a decade Unless Amazon can provide downloadable material, it risks losing business to those who can rather like a decade ago when Amazon itself attacked conventional book and music shops. e) Discuss the contribution of organisational knowledge to the strategic capability of an organisation.[2] Before the importance of knowledge management is discussed, an attempt has to be made to define knowledge. This can only be done by comparing knowledge with data and information. Data is raw fact. For example, a list in ascending order of all
Information is data that has meaning. For example, a list of all outstanding invoices sorted by customer and with subtotals calculated for each customer. Now the data has meaning and has become useful. Knowledge is information in someones mind. A printout of the sales ledger contains information, but if it is never read by someone, it will never become knowledge and remains useless until it is read.
Knowledge is of two types.
Explicit knowledge. This is generally written down and organisations
Page 32 of 45
09/12/2011

know that it exists. Tacit knowledge. Not written, often existing only in employees minds. Organisations are unlikely to know that it exists, or the extent to which it exists. Corporate knowledge or organisational knowledge is the knowledge and knowhow that is acquired by the entity as a whole. It is created through the interaction between technologies, techniques and people. Within organisations, knowledge comes from a combination of: collaboration between people, who share their knowledge and create new knowledge together technology, which makes it possible to store and communicate knowledge information systems that make use of the technology systems, and information analysis techniques. Knowledge gives a company a competitive advantage. Another important characteristic of corporate knowledge is therefore that it cannot be easily replicated by a competitor. It is something unique to the company that owns it. A capability in knowledge management comes from a combination of unique resources and core competences: experience in an industry or market, and acquiring knowledge through experience the knowledge that employees have or acquire, for example through training the management of people, and success in encouraging creativity and new ideas the management of IS/IT systems. The growing importance of knowledge management Knowledge management has become an important part of gaining and mantaining competitive advantage. Reasons for this are as follows. Both business and notforprofit organisations are more complex so there is more knowledge to manage. For example, there are many more government regulations that have to be followed for health and safety. The government sets many more targets to monitor the performance of hospitals and schools. The environment, technology, competitors and markets are changing rapidly. Look at the pace of change in the broadcast/internet industry. The move from manufacturing to service industries means that a greater proportion of an organisations knowledge is likely to be tacit. It is relatively easy to formally specify a product, but harder to specify everything that should happen in the successful delivery of a service.
Greater job mobility means that, unless captured and recorded, valuable knowledge can be lost as staff move on. f) Identify opportunities for managing the strategic capability of an organisation.[2] So far in this section we have concentrated on the analysis of strategic capability. We must now turn our attention to the problems of managing and improving it.
Page 33 of 45
09/12/2011

Limitations on managing strategic capability There is an important problem in the management of strategic capability, in that it can be very difficult to understand it properly. Quite often, core competences derive from informal and flexible activities and processes that are not subject to management from above: they simply exist. Sometimes, managers do not appreciate that these competences exist; where they do, they may or may not understand them or value them. Where managers recognise such competences, it is very important that they take great care with attempts to improve or even to formalise them. The former can be highly disruptive, while the latter can eliminate the inherent flexibility such competences tend to display. Improving strategic Capability a) competences can be extended - those that already exist transferred to new activities b) non-essential activities can cease - abolish, minimise or outsource current activities that do no support CSFs c) activities can be added and existing one improved - in order to better support CSFs d) activities can be re-structured e) weaknesses can be remedied - known weaknesses might point to new opportunities if a market exists - these weaknesses must be remedied through proper management f) external capability can be introduced - through acquisition, alliances or joint ventures g) Determine the strengths and weaknesses of an organisation and formulate an appropriate SWOT analysis.[2] Assessing resources and competences In addition to assessing the external environment, including markets and competitors, strategic managers should also assess the internal resources of the entity, its competences and its capabilities. The following assessment is required: What are the resources of the entity? Which of these resources are unique or special? What value do they provide? (What competitive advantage do they provide?) Will requirements for resources change, as a result of changes in the business environment? How are the resources used? Are they used effectively and efficiently? What core competences does the entity have? Techniques for assessing resources and competences There are several techniques that might be used to assess the resources and competences of an entity. Management need to understand how value is created, and how value might be lost. An assessment of the value that is created or lost by the entity can be made using value chain analysis or value network analysis. These were described in the previous chapter. Management can prepare a capability profile of the entity. This is an assessment of the key strategic processes that are needed to provide consistently superior value to customers. This is an assessment of capabilities and competitive advantage. A capability profile might be prepared together with a SWOT analysis. In order to prepare a capability profile or a SWOT analysis, management need a thorough understanding of the
Page 34 of 45
09/12/2011

resources that the entity has, the value of those resources, and the competences that the entity has acquired in using those resources. This can be provided by a resource audit. Resource audit A resource audit is an initial assessment of the resources of an entity. It is carried out to establish what resources there are, which are unique and how efficiently and effectively they are being used. A resource audit should identify all the significant resources that are used by an entity. These will vary according to the nature of the entity. In general, however, a resource audit should provide data about the following resources. Size and composition of the workforce Efficiency of the workforce Flexibility of the workforce Rate of labour wastage/turnover Labour relations between management and workers Skills, experience, qualifications Any particular expertise? Labour costs: salaries and wages
Human resources (Part-time and fulltime employees, consultants, subcontractors etc)
Management
Size of the management team Historical performance Skills of the managers Nature of management structure, the division of authority and responsibility Costs as a percentage of total costs Sources, suppliers Availability Future provision. Scarcity? Wastage rates Alternative materials and alternative sources of supply
Raw materials
Non-current assets
What are they? How old are they? What is their expected useful life? What is their current value? What is the amount of sales and profit per $1 invested in non-current assets? Are they technologically advanced or out-of-date? What condition are they in? How well are they repaired and maintained? What is the utilisation rate for each group of noncurrent assets? Are there any intellectual rights, such as patent rights Are there valuable brand names? Does the organisation have any identifiable goodwill? What is the reputation of the entity with its customers?
Intangible resources and copyrights?
Page 35 of 45
09/12/2011

How well does it know them? Is the work force well-motivated? What is the capital of the entity? What are its sources of new capital? What are the cash flows of the entity? What are its sources of liquidity? How well does it control trade receivables? How well does it control other elements of working capital? How well does the entity control the use of its resources? How effective are its controls over the efficient and effective use of assets? How effective are its controls over accounting and financial reporting? How effective are its controls over compliance with regulations? How effective are its risk management systems? Is the entity organised in an efficient way?
Financial resources
Internal controls and organisation
Evaluating resources Having identified its key resources, management can evaluate them and the entitys ability to use them efficiently and effectively to create value (competences). A simple framework for evaluating resources is the VIRO framework:
V: Value. Does the resource provide competitive advantage? R: Rarity. Do competitors own similar resources, or are the resources unique? I: Imitability. Would it be costly for competitors to imitate the resource or acquire it? O: Organisation. Is the entity organised to exploit its resources to best advantage?
SWOT analysis and strengths and weaknesses SWOT analysis was described in an earlier chapter as a technique for analysing strategic position and identifying key factors that might affect business strategy. These factors are both internal and external to the entity. In the previous chapter, SWOT analysis was explained in the context of identifying opportunities and threats in the environment. It is also used to identify strengths and weaknesses in the resources, competences and capabilities of the entity. Strengths. Strengths are resources and competences that an organisation has, and the capabilities it has developed. Strengths in resources, competences and capabilities can be exploited and developed to create sustainable competitive advantage. Weaknesses. Weaknesses are resources, competences and capabilities that are deficient or lacking. These weaknesses are preventing the entity from developing or sustaining competitive advantage.
Page 36 of 45
09/12/2011

Identifying strengths and weaknesses In your examination, you might be given a question that contains a case study or scenario, and asked to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the entity and the opportunities and threats that it faces. To identify strengths and weaknesses, you should consider the following: Resources - Consider all the resources of the entity, and identify those that are significant and unique. Include the skills of management and other employees in your assessment. You should also consider the knowledge that the entity has acquired, and its intellectual capital. - Consider whether there are key resources that the entity lacks, but a competitor might have. Competences - Consider all the activities and processes of the entity and how it uses its resources. Identify the competences of the entity and consider whether any of these are core competences that provide competitive advantage. - Consider the competences that the entity lacks. Capabilities - Consider the capabilities of the entity, and its relative success or failure in delivering value to the customer or in creating cost efficiency.
Page 37 of 45
09/12/2011
6. The expectations of stakeholders and the influence of ethics and culture a) Advise on the implications of corporate governance on organisational purpose and strategy.[2] The meaning of corporate governance Corporate governance is the way in which a company is governed and led. Governance is not concerned with detailed management issues, such as planning and operational control. It is about giving direction to the company, and accounting to the owners and other stakeholders of the company for the success or failure of the company in achieving its objectives. The need for corporate governance The need for corporate governance arises because in all but the smallest organisations there is a separation between ownership and control. The principal-agent model is useful in explaining how the system should work: agents should work on behalf of their principals. However self interest can cause agents to work for their own benefit at the expense of their principals (remuneration packages, share options, budget padding, short termism to make current results look good at the expense of longterm performance). Laws, accounting standards and various codes (eg The Combined Code in UK) have been developed to enhance corporate governance. Typical features of codes, such as the Combined Code include: boards should have nonexecutive directors to advise and warn the executive directors. Executive and nonexecutive directors (NEDs) should be in balance so that neither group dominates there should be a separation of the roles of chairman and chief executive executive remuneration should be decided by a remuneration committee, consisting of nonexecutive directors an audit committee, comprising nonexecutive directors should look after the appointment of supervision of auditors. Implications of corporate governance on organisational purpose and strategy The results of the increasing focus on governance issues are as follows: Increasing power of governance bodies Increasing shareholder power, ensuring that companies are run with shareholders interests prioritised. Greater pressure on boards to formulate strategy and be seen to control the businesses concerned. Greater scrutiny of quoted businesses, resulting in more shorttermism Greater emphasis on risk assessments, so directors may feel pressured to undertake lower risk (and hence lower return) projects b) Evaluate, through stakeholder mapping, the relative influence of stakeholders on organisational
Page 38 of 45
09/12/2011

purpose and strategy.[3] A stakeholder of an organisation is anyone affected by, or can affect, the organisation. Any organisation has many different interested parties or stakeholders. Often, each will have different objectives and degrees of influence or power. Their objectives may well be in conflict. Note that just because a stakeholder has power does not mean that there is a right to exercise that power. This has implications for corporate governance where Johnson, Scholes and Whittington suggest that a governance framework determines whom the organisation is there to serve and how the purposes and priorities of the organisation should be decided. It is a function of management to satisfactorily and ethically resolve conflicting demands. Stakeholder mapping Stakeholder mapping can help deal with stakeholders conflicting demands. It identifies stakeholder expectations and power and helps in establishing political priorities. The process involves making decisions on the following two issues. 1) How interested the stakeholder is to impress their expectations on the organisations choice of strategies, i.e. how likely is the stakeholder to exercise power? 2) To what extent the stakeholder has power to impose its wants? This power/interest matrix is referred to as Medalow's Matrix
The matrix is normally completed with regard to the stakeholder impact of a particular strategy. The purpose is to assess: whether stakeholder resistance is likely to inhibit the success of the strategy what policies may ease the acceptance of the strategy?
The following strategies might be applicable to each quadrant:
Minimum Effort
Their lack of interest and power makes them open to influence. They are more likely than others to accept what they are told and follow instructions.
Keep Informed
Do not have a great ability to influence strategy, but their views can be important in influencing more powerful stakeholders, perhaps by lobbying. They should be kept informed. Community representatives & charities might be good examples.
Page 39 of 45
09/12/2011

Keep Satisified
Must be treated with care. While often passive, they are capable of moving to segment D. They should therefore be kept satisfied. Large institutional shareholders might fall in this box.
Key Players
The strategy must be acceptable to them, at least. An example would be a major customer.
c) Assess ethical influences on organisational purpose and strategy.[3] Ethics are important to business because society considers such things important. The ethics of business conduct by individual companies depends largely on the ethical stance of the company and its leaders. Ethical issues concerning business exist at three levels. Macro level the role of business at national and international level and concerned with assessing the relative virtues of different political/social systems, e.g. centrally planned economies and free enterprise. Corporate level focuses on the ethical issues facing individual companies when formulating and implementing strategies. Individual level concerns the behaviour and actions of individuals within the organisation. Ethical stances Johnson, Scholes and Whittington define ethical stance as: The extent to which an organisation will exceed its minimum obligations to stakeholders. There are four possible ethical stances:
Short-term S/H Interest. The company takes the view that its only interests should be the short-term interests of its shareholders. Business decisions should be taken with satisfying shareholder interests as the only objective. Lonter-term S/H Interest. The company takes the view that the interests of its shareholders are the most important concern, but that in the long term the company will benefit by showing some concerns for the interests of employees, communities, the general public and the environment. The company therefore acts in its enlightened self-interest. Multiple Stakeholder Obligation. The company recognises an obligation not only to its shareholders, but to other stakeholder groups. Shaper of Society. The company has an ethical obligation towards society as a whole, and should be a shaper of society, creating a fair and just society for everyone. Financial objectives should be of secondary importance.
Page 40 of 45
09/12/2011

Consequences of unethical behaviour Acting ethically reduces risk. There are several possible consequences of unethical behaviour. When business conduct is illegal or in breach of regulations, there is a risk of being found out. The consequences could be the payment of fines to the authorities or compensation to individuals who have suffered as a consequence of the illegal behaviour. In some cases, individual directors might be liable to imprisonment for illegal behaviour. When businesses act legally but in a way that the general public considers immoral, there is a risk of action by the government to makes such action illegal. Businesses that act in an unethical way are also exposed to reputation risk. Benefits of an organisation being ethical Apart from an ethical organisation being, perhaps, morally correct, there are more quantifiable business benefits: not exposed to reputation risk seen favourably by public - stable earnings? Cheaper finance available? attractive to customers attractive to potential employees attractive to potential collaborators and partners less time and cost spent dealing with investigations by regulatory bodies less spent on paying damages and fines.
d) Explore the scope of corporate social responsibility.[3] The extent to which an organisation recognises it's obligations to society in general. Businesses, particularly, large one, are subject to increasing expectations that they will exercise social responsibility. The concept focuses on the provision of specific benefits to society in general, such as charitable donations, the creation or preservation of employment and spending on environmental improvement or maintainence. CSR is linked to ethical behaviour but it is not the same thing. A business managed with the sole objective of maximising shareholder wealth can be run in just as ethical a fashion as one in which social responsibility is assumed. CSR usually means that a company goes further than required by law in order to: treat employees fairly and with respect operate in an ethical way and with integrity, in all its business dealings with customer, suppliers, lenders and others respect human rights eg. avoid dealing with suppliers in developing countries who use child slave labour. sustain the environment for future generations be a responsible neighbour in the community and a good corporate citizen. Implications of ethics and CSR for strategy Companies that acknowledge their ethical responsibilities and corporate social responsibility need to demonstrate their genuine commitment to these ideals. To do this, they need to consider the implications of ethics and CSR for their strategic planning and objectives. For example:
Page 41 of 45
09/12/2011

A company that uses large quantities of timber as a raw material might adopt a policy of re-forestation, to replace trees that they have cut down. A company that sells sea fish might adopt a policy of maintaining fish stocks in the seas. Ethics might also affect a companys policy to its employees. If a company has a formal policy of providing secure employment, fair wages and salaries, and good working conditions to its employees, this policy might affect strategic decisions about re-locating business and making staff redundant. A policy of ethical business dealing might involve a business decision that all suppliers will be paid promptly. CSR and competitive advantage The significance of CSR probably varies between different countries, but in some countries, particularly Europe and North America, companies are waking up to the strategic possibilities and strategic advantages of being an environmental-friendly company. Customers might be willing to pay more for environment-friendly and for healthy food. There is growing interest in smaller motor cars and cars driven by bio-fuel or electricity. CSR activities can therefore create value. The different views The shareholder view Friedman argues that, the social responsibility of business is to make a profit. The justifications for this are: pursuing profit will result in increased employment, generate economic growth, stimulate innovation, increase the tax take and generally raise living standards. Making profits is therefore itself a public good and is a sufficient purpose of business directors should be acting on behalf of the shareholders. CSR too often means that directors are being charitable with other peoples money shareholders are free to use their dividends to contribute towards CSR if they wish business is not competent to decide moral and ethical matters. Where is the democratic connection between what a business decides to spend money and effort on and where that money and effort are actually needed or wanted by society? Are CSR projects chosen simply because they are areas where directors, or their spouses, are personally interested. The longerterm selfinterest view Drucker argues that it is in the long-term economic self-interest of business to act in a reasonably responsible manner. Failure to do so will prompt legislation. Failure to do so will damage the business and even the industry. The public relations and enhancement of reputation arising from CSR will increase profits in the long term. CSR is therefore seen and justified as expenditure that helps to generate long term profits. The stakeholder view This view assumes that shareholders are simply one stakeholder among many, and that their interests are not necessarily paramount. There may be circumstances where shareholder interest has to be sacrificed for the greater good of other stakeholders.
Page 42 of 45
09/12/2011

Quite how it is decided which stakeholders deserve generosity at any particular time is not clear. There is a danger that the stakeholders that benefit are those with most power which is not necessarily the same as the stakeholders who might deserve attention. Externalities - there is particular concern over externalities, or the social and environmental costs of corporate activies. e) Assess the impact of culture on organisational purpose and strategy.[3] Is the set of values, guiding beliefs, understandings and ways of thinking that are shared by the members of an organisation and is taught to new members as correct. It represents the unwritten, feeling part of the organisation. Is the way we do things around here (Charles Handy).
Is a set of taken-for-granted assumptions, views of the environment, behaviours and routines (Schein).
Culture can have a significant influence on strategic planning and implementation and it can both influence and be influenced by organisational structure. Culture affects what the employees within an organisation believe that the organisation should be doing and what it should be trying to achieve. It affects their attitude to work generally and standards of performance. Culture is therefore a very important factor in whether organisations achieve their objectives, realise their strategies and achieve competitive advantage. Within an organisation, there might be one culture. On the other hand, there might be different cultures in different parts of the organisation. Changing the corporate culture is a very important part of managing change. It can also be the most difficult part, if only because the desired culture is difficult to specify and define.
Page 43 of 45
09/12/2011
f) Prepare and evaluate a cultural web of an organisation.[2] The cultural web provides a way of understanding behaviours within an organisation and making sure all the organisational elements are aligned with one another, and with an organisation's strategy. The paradigm is the common, basic assumptions and beliefs held by an organisation's decision makers. The cultural web is concerned with the manifestations of culture in the organisation and has six interrelated elements. Routines and rituals routines are the way things are done around here and may even demonstrate a beneficial competency. Rituals signal that something is especially valued. They include events such as award ceremonies for best performing salesperson. Stories and myths these are told by members of an organisation. They embed the present in its organisational history and demonstrate important events and personalities, as well as mavericks that deviate from the norm. Symbols such as logos, offices, cars, titles, type of language and terminology commonly used become a shorthand representation of the nature of the organisation. Power structure the dominant coalition is the obvious source of power in an organisation. This may be based on management position and seniority but in some organisations power can be lodged with other levels or functions. Organisational structure reflects the formal and informal ways in which the organisation works. Structures are likely to reflect power. Control systems the measurement and reward systems that emphasise what is important to monitor and to focus attention and activity upon.
Page 44 of 45
09/12/2011

Implications of the cultural web for business strategy The importance of the cultural web for business strategy is that is provides a means of looking at cultural assumptions and practices, to make sure that organisational elements are aligned with one another, and with an organisation's strategy. If an organisation is not delivering the results its management wants, management can use the web to help diagnose whether the organisation's culture is contributing to the underperformance. There are 3 phases to such analysis. 1) look at the culture as it is now 2) look at how you want the culture to be 3) identify the differences between the two These differences indicate the changes which will need to be made to achieve the high performance culture that they are seeking. In this way, the cultural web can play a significant role in change management, and changing organisational culture. g) Advise on how organisations can communicate their core values and mission.[3] The culture of an entity includes the ethical stance and ethical values of its individual members. When the directors of a company wish to promote ethical values and recognition of social and environmental responsibilities, they need to introduce these values into the corporate culture. Changing culture can take a long time particularly in a big organisation with many employees. If the board of directors are serious in their wish to change ethical views and the companys values, they must give the lead to everyone else. Cultural values within a company are set by the tone at the top the leadership and example set by the directors and senior managers. There must be a conscious effort to change aspects of the cultural web. New cultural values can be communicated to all employees through formal communications, such as a new ethics code or the company in-house magazine. The reward structure might be changed, so that rewards are given to employees who accept the new cultural values and achieve performance linked to those values.
Page 45 of 45
09/12/2011

P3 Business Analysis Section A

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

P3 Business Analysis Section A

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A.

(and vocabulary of strategy)

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

Strategic Position Strategic Choices Strategy into Action

Limited financial resources

Not For Profit

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

Experience Conformity Analysis & Control

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

Strategic Position (A)

Strategic Choices (B)

Business Process Change

Information Technology (E)

Quality Issues (F)

Financial Analysis (H)

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

Industry or Sector Competitors and Markets

Porters Five Forces Cycles of Competition

Strategic Groups Market Segments Critical Success Factors

Degree of change in the environment

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

5. The internal resources, capabilities and competences of an organisation

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

Knowledge is of two types.

Explicit knowledge. This is generally written down and organisations

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

Human resources (Part-time and fulltime employees, consultants, subcontractors etc)

Intangible resources and copyrights?

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

Internal controls and organisation

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

The following strategies might be applicable to each quadrant:

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position

P3 Business Analysis Syllabus A. Strategic Position