Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Instructional Material Review Form

    Uploaded by

    Meg Gutierrez
    3K views3 pages
    This document provides checklists for reviewing instructional materials. The first section lists questions to consider about the content and appropriateness of the materials. Example questions include whether the content covers program competencies and is at the appropriate competency level. The second section expands on additional factors such as required materials, teacher guides, bias, and testing. Reviewers are asked to rate materials on a scale and provide comments. The overall goal is to select high quality materials that align with objectives and can be effectively implemented in the classroom.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document provides checklists for reviewing instructional materials. The first section lists questions to consider about the content and appropriateness of the materials. Example questions include whether the content covers program competencies and is at the appropriate competency level. The second section expands on additional factors such as required materials, teacher guides, bias, and testing. Reviewers are asked to rate materials on a scale and provide comments. The overall goal is to select high quality materials that align with objectives and can be effectively implemented in the classroom.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3K views3 pages

    Instructional Material Review Form

    Uploaded by

    Meg Gutierrez
    This document provides checklists for reviewing instructional materials. The first section lists questions to consider about the content and appropriateness of the materials. Example questions include whether the content covers program competencies and is at the appropriate competency level. The second section expands on additional factors such as required materials, teacher guides, bias, and testing. Reviewers are asked to rate materials on a scale and provide comments. The overall goal is to select high quality materials that align with objectives and can be effectively implemented in the classroom.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    INS1kUC1ICNAL MA1LkIAL kLVILW ICkM

    AdopLed from Marvin Patterson Center for Studies in Vocational Education Florida State
    University

    Use the foIIowing code to rate materiaIs:

    2eans yes or good quality
    2eans no or poor quality
    2eans all right, but not of especially good quality
    2eans not applicable

    #ate ommittee Members
    1. Does the content cover a significant portion of the progra2 co2petencies?
    2. s the content up- to -date?
    3. s the co2petency level appropriate for 2ost stuoents?
    4. Are tests included in the 2aterials?
    5. Are hands-on activities included?
    6.How 2any outside 2aterials are required?
    + 2eans 0-1 2aterials o 2eans 2-3 2aterials 2eans 4+ 2aterials
    7.Would you use these 2aterials in your training progra2?
    If the materiaIs to this point appear to be a possibIe choice for seIection,
    continue with your review.
    Stop if the 2aterials appear to be too poor for further 0.
    1. s a Teacher's guide included which offers 2anage2ent suggestions for the
    2aterials?
    2. s the 2aterial presented in a logical sequence?
    3.Quality of objectives, co2petencies, and/or tasks
    4. Degree of 2atch between learning activities and objectives.
    5. Quality of test ite2s and degree of 2atch with objectives.
    6. Quality of per for2ance checklists and degree of 2atch with objectives.
    7. Quality of directions for how student s are to proceed through the 2aterials
    8. Quality of drawings, photographs, and/or other visual s.
    9. Overall design of the learning activities for individualized instruction.
    10.E2phasis on safety practices (when needed)
    11.Degree of freedo2 fro2 bias with respect to sex, race, national origin, age, religion,
    etc. (see provided guidelines)
    12. Quality of 2anage2ent procedures for teachers (teacher's guides, etc.).
    13. (Optional) List the career-2ap co2petencies covered by these 2aterials.
    omments:







    #IDA DEPA#%MEN% EDUA%IN
    heckIist for #eviewing and SeIecting MateriaIs'
    LvL l - -$
    Lqu|pment and Storage Cons|derat|ons
    f equlpmenL ls needed Lo use Lhe maLerlals ls Lhe equlpmenL avallable
    s space avallable ln Lhe classroom Lo sLore Lhe
    s work space avallable ln Lhe classroom so LhaL maLerlals can be used properly?

    Moterio/suse considerotions
    Are Leachers guldes lncluded ln Lhe maLerlals?
    f Lhe maLerlals requlre lnnovaLlve or unusual sLraLegles arc Lhere lndlcaLlons
    Lhe sLraLegles used ln Lhe maLerlals can easlly be lnLegraLed lnLo your presenL
    sysLem wlLhouL havlng longLerm negaLlve effecLs on sLudenL learnlng

    Pave maLerlals been fleldLesLed and found Lo be successful?

    cost considerotions
    s Lhere enough money ln Lhe budgeL?
    Wlll Lhe maLerlals be used ofLen enough Lo [usLlfy Lhe cosL?
    Can you afford Lo conLlnue uslng Lhe maLerlals?
    Are maLerlals well made and llkely Lo wlLhsLand repeaLed use

    LvL ll
    content considerotions
    oes Lhe conLenL maLch course ob[ecLlves?
    s Lhe conLenL approprlaLe?
    nctionsoflnstrction considerotions
    Are Lhe maLerlals llkely Lo galn and malnLaln Lhe learners aLLenLlon?
    Are Lhe maLerlals llkely Lo lnform Lhe learner of Lhe ob[ecLlve?
    o Lhe maLerlals provlde for recall of relevanL learnlng?

    9ort 1wo 4/ternotive 4pprooches to dcotiono/ vo/otion
    o Lhe maLerlals presenL learnlng conLenL ln approprlaLe ways?
    o Lhe maLerlals provlde learnlng guldance?
    o Lhe maLerlals provlde an opporLunlLy Lo pracLlce?
    s feedback on Lhe performance provlded wlLhln Lhe maLerlals?
    Are Lhere provlslons wlLhln Lhe maLerlals for assesslng Lhe learners performance?
    o Lhe maLerlals provlde for reLenLlon and Lransfer?
    lnstrctiono/ 5troteqies considerotions
    Arc maLerlals pracLlcal and easy Lo use?
    5tereotypinq ond 8ios considerotions
    o maLerlals avold sLereoLypes and blas?

    Conc|us|on

    You might also like