Professional Documents
Culture Documents
weak with their only means to obtain success. ”..Nor do I believe that there was
ever a man from obscure condition arrived at great power by merely employing
open force, but there are many who succeeded by fraud alone...”
And serious questions about his past continue to swirl as Election Day
looms, fueled in part by his own campaign’s refusal to make relevant
documents available.
And the press, usually banging at the door for candidates to make “full
disclosure” is strangely quiet about Obama’s stonewalling.
A Newsmax survey of key Obama aspects of Obama’s public and private
life continued to be shielded from the public.
The hue and cry from the media for disclosure usually forces
candidates to release sought after documents. But the press has
largely acquiesced to Obama’s stonewalling.
The media has said that Obama is the greatest orator ever seen. His verbal
journalists. Yet even children notice no such orator power emanating from Obama.
He talks like a boring negro preacher. He uses that rhythm which the media calls
“hypnotic” but objective people refer to as sing-song, boringly crude and phony.
He stumbles over his rehearsed presentation as sane viewers look at the cheering
section of white people behind him. They are well made up to look like working
people but it is obvious that they have been recruited from the ranks of Marxist
academia. Their faces continually reflect worshipful awe and reverence for the
below average black man they call “the One.” Do you trust people who are so crazy
about a man who is involved with Marxist terrorists, plans to re-distribute working
men’s wages too the rich and blacks and oozes with deceit and evil?
If you have been watching Obama speaking and being interviewed you may have
noticed that he seems to reveal spot light more than even the most egotistical of
political candidates. He spends a half hour going through the crowd after he is
introduced, shaking hands like a Messiah. He has this condescending look down his
nose and sometimes sneers when he talks to interviewers and looks especially
perturbed and angry when berating someone who he perceives is attacking him. He
morphs his voice and body language to suit each audience in a manner that goes
why?
Here are other narcissistic nonverbal and behavioral cues that have been written
about Obama.
Personality Disorder). There are a handful that I’ve come to trust, though they’re
An amorphous expression that looks like a child, about three years old,
needing approval. I’ve almost never seen this expression in someone who isn’t
interacting with. In males, it makes the face look like that of a little boy.
There’s reduced activity in some of the musculature around the eyes. This
people (both less of a change in pupil diameter, and a longer lag before pupil
size changes). I think people with NPD also spend less time playing through
There’s also something I call “frozen cheeks”. Muscles in the cheek region
The contempt can often be an open clear-cut expression, but much of the
time it’s just a subtle tensing of the musculature, underlying the “apparent”
expression.
Obama displays all of these (the first as micro expressions). There’s also his
entitlement body language, his glares, his cocked head and “looking down the
nose”, etc.. He occupies quite a bit of space and also frequently initiates
An assured smooth gesture - in a way that’s slightly unusual given our culture’s
Sometimes it’s blatant, but more often it’s a subtle expression. When Hillary
scores a solid point in a debate, or when a journalist challenges him in a question,
you can see a sustained increase in the subtle expression of anger. People with NPD
often have a high level of latent anger that can be triggered by any injury to self-
In case you haven’t seen these, here are a links to a couple of YouTube videos that
people have put together capturing some of Obama’s more blatant anger/contempt
expressions:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9coNTKQi544
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvFSECcANZE&feature=related
People with NPD are typically hypercompetitive and hate losing. One woman I know
of would throw the checkerboard across the room if she lost a game of checkers
with her eight year old son. Obama is clearly hypercompetitive and is known as a
bad loser - people that he has played poker with comment on him being a poor loser,
and he’s said to be a bad loser in politics as well (e.g. when he lost to Bobby Rush).
Narcissists that I’ve known are generally charming and are frequently liked
liked. The adoring crowds have appeared to honor the most evil men in the world
since the persona presented to the crowd frequently has nothing to do with the
real person. A person like Obama that refuses to anwer the personal questions
required of all candidates and is supported by a leftist press that ferrets out the
most microscopic failing of Republicans, cannot be viewed with anything less than
smaller scale than Obama - a circle of admiring people. There’s a need for a high
level of admiration.
Obama’s well Staged Electoral Rallies Afford Insight Into His Psyche
“So why wasn’t I dancing and singing along? Why did I have a terrible taste in my
mouth two hours after Obama’s speech even as the sun shone and the warm spring
Part of it was the narcissism of the self-presentation. Obama does this creepy
thing after being introduced. He approaches the stage only after a good 5 minutes
Please. Candidates should stand humbly by the side of the stage and walk up right
after being introduced. I do not attend political rallies to see a pretend savior
savoring popular adulation as he dances through the cool stream of the multitude.”
Though people with NPD often cultivate a circle of admirers, they tend to have few
exist among persons of power and influence..." The influential, everywhere, share a
common elitist bond. They manipulate the masses for personal gain, self-esteem
nothing odd or queer about him, and in every respect he tends to embody the
than the average person, he/she is likely to seem free from the minor distortions,
about him/her is likely to suggest desirable and superior human qualities, a robust
mental health..."
genuine relationships with others, a lack of empathy, and a callous disregard for
Hussein also exhibits sociopathic behavior. "...The sociopath is said to be: a con-
man, manipulative, a facile and convincing liar, selfish, callous, charming, disarmingly
capable of understanding others and their motives...a blamer of others rather than
responsibility to others..."
.For someone with NPD, it’s predominantly about the surface - the image in the
mirror. There’s less of a solid core. One perspective that many psychologists
subscribe to is that in NPD, the “true self” is greatly diminished or largely absent,
having largely been replaced by a “false self”. Another interesting characteristic,
indifference. Floating slightly above it all, sometimes with a slight bit of contempt.
You can often see Obama doing this in interviews.The entitlement aspect comes
through not only in his body language, but also in things he does and says.For
example, he was interviewed about the tactics he used to first win elected office,
as an Illinois State Senator. It was a very liberal Chicago district, so the only real
opposition was in the Democratic primary. He had four opponents, including the
incumbent (a woman named Alice Palmer - long time popular activist). Obama hired
the best lawyers in Chicago and used aggressive legal tactics to challenge the
nominating petitions of each of his opponents; knocking them all off the ballot so
that he could run unopposed (it would have been very difficult for him to win the
election if the incumbent remained on the ballot). In 2007 a reporter asked him
about this:“Asked whether the district’s primary voters were well-served by having
only one candidate, Obama smiled and said: ‘I think they ended up with a very good
state senator.’And he defended his use of ballot maneuvers: ‘If you can win, you
found the following description by Sam Vaknin to be pretty accurate (though the
“Narcissists …don’t talk, or communicate. They fend off. They hide and evade and
shifting semiotic and semantic dunes - they perfect the ability to say nothing in
communicate but to obscure, not to share but to abstain, not to learn but to
defend and resist, not to teach but to preserve ever less tenable monopolies, to
expression of intent at a given moment - rather than the clear listing of long term,
of our world - that its absence is not postulated even in the remotest galaxies
which grace the skies of science fiction. In this sense, narcissists are nothing
short of aliens.
With cerebral narcissists, language is a lover. The infatuation with its very sound
leads to a pyrotechnic type of speech which sacrifices its meaning to its music. Its
speakers pay more attention to the composition than to the content. They are
its forms.”
others. With Obama this manifests, for example, in the nature of the personality
cult he is encouraging. You can also see a bit of it in statements like “We are the
ones we’ve been waiting for; we are the change that we seek.”
One of the core deficits in NPD - perhaps the core deficit - is a deficiency in
empathy. They can talk about empathy (e.g. one NPD woman I know likes to lecture
others about empathy), and their cognitive empathy is intact (they can correctly
interpret what others are feeling - often better than average), but there’s a
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1207/7486.html
Several genetic studies have been done to separate environmental from genetic
effects in NPD (mostly studies using twins). These studies have consistently shown
NPD to be highly heritable. Across the studies that I’ve seen, the median estimate
of heritability is somewhere roughly around 0.7 (on a linear scale of 0 to 1, with 1
being perfectly heritable). This doesn’t mean that someone with an NPD parent will
necessarily be NPD, but it does mean that they’re at substantially increased risk.
There are also environmental risk factors (e.g. abuse or excessive adulation during
childhood). Along these lines, the history of Obama’s father is really interesting
(ignore the headline - the person composing the headline appears not to have read
the article).
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=4319
08&in_page_id=1770
“Barack was a lot like my father - his hand movements, his gestures, how he talks,
how he sits. He’s got certain quietness about him and he sits and he concentrates
like my father. He can be in a room full of people and he withdraws on his own. And
we’ve all got the Obama hands - the fingers and everything. So it was amazing to
watch that, because I was meeting him for the first time but it felt like I knew
going, those blessings that were right there in front of me.” He has tried to turn
this to his advantage. “I know I haven’t spent a lot of time learning the ways of
Washington,” he said in announcing that he would run for president. “But I’ve been
there long enough to know that the ways of Washington must change.” Obama’s
restlessness is a quality that would lead him to conclude, again and again, that the
time had come to make a move—to take a chance, to aim higher - when others told
Anyway, those are some of the reasons I think Obama has NPD.
Though NPD is rare in the general population (1-2%), for a very complicated set of
reasons I’ve ended up having contact with a pretty large sample size.
ideal love
6. is interpersonally exploitative
7. lacks empathy
If you have extended personal contact with people diagnosed with NPD, you’ll find
Obama has stated that his backround, being the child of black and white parents,
and his unique experience make him uniquely qualified to help unify blacks and
whites; add the N-component and the argument takes on a different meaning: I am
unique and all others ( he insinuates whites) who disagree with me are not – in fact,
they are typical ( and typical means not unique); I would propose he felt slighted at
looking black, so he sided with the black community, black church, black wife, and
black cause which the cause celeb is , Not to be equal, but better than - to be
supremely unique… which for a N-person means to dominate — which is their end
game;
Narcissism comes in many different flavors, but it behaves the same, the control
tactics are an arsenal of overt and covert manipulation, charm, flattery, slights,
contrariness, one upmanship, adaptability, and more, all done to dominate; I find it
interesting when Obama states what good ideas he and Clinton share, he declares
he is the better candidate; he lifts her up when they are in agreement, and puts
her down to undermine her credibility; this is part of the approach, assess,
The N-person has a false-ego that requires constant bolstering and the N-person
seeks out those he can use: to gleen expertise from, to get support from, or to
control;
More importantly, the N-person envies others who they perceive as truly better
than they are…as in, more skilled, more astute, more successful, etc; the N-person
sees themselves as perfect on an unconscious level, and any person who challenges
their perfection ( their worldview and self-image, false as they may be) is
considered the enemy; they are very poor losers and very poor team players; they
are good at motivating, charming, encouraging…then they take the credit for other
peoples accomplishments or achievements as though they had done those acts
themselves; this boosts their false-ego and keeps their sense of self stable;
suit his location, his audience, and his topic, that it is difficult to know just what
his real voice is or who he truly is. Listen to how Obama's cadence has that certain
rhythm like a Baptist preacher. Listen to how he speaks on beat and extends
certain words. For example, "They saaaaaaaid this day would never come."
Preachers have a special rhythmic pattern where their voices fluctuate up and
down like a song and pause on a beat rhythmically like a paradiddle on a drum. His
speaking is so musical and pleasing to the ear, that we can be moved by the rhythm
and not even hear the words. In fact the words may actually lack substance and he
Obama’s vocal style is hypnotic, such that when his voice goes up and then he
pauses, you almost want to cheer and say amen. You can’t help yourself. He actually
copies the feel and the cadence of Martin Luther King’s “I had a dream” speech.
Listen to how to his volume goes up and up and up…stirring the crowd, and then he
pauses for effect. He waits until the audience cheers before he moves on to the
next sentence. Pausing makes the word before the pause, and sometimes the entire
And notice how he says particular words, like “you small towns and churches,
slightly more southern accent or he casually slurs the word. That makes him sound
like one of the common folk. So even when we know that he came from an upper
class family, when he says, “calloused hand by calloused hand,” he sounds like he
was there with us working on the farm and plowing the field.
One of the most interesting and dramatic aspects of Obama’s body and para
language is that it changes so much from speech to speech and location to location.
While many candidates slow down their speech slightly to charm their southern
audiences and increase their rate for New York news shows, Obama transforms.
For example, if you had never heard him speak before and watched him give his
Selma Alabama speech you would note his voice is extremely slow and takes on the
relaxed consonants and cadence of Alabama. When he is interviewed on1/10/2007
concerning his response to the Bush Speech his voice pace is face, his speech is
gives them significant extended eye contact, leans forward and stays in their
Remember what makes a candidate look honest and powerful to us when we view
him or her on the small screen, may be counter to what may look appropriate to the
audience he or she is speaking to when they are taped in front of a live audience.
unusual he turns his face and body to sides or moves his entire body towards the
audience to shows his desire to empathize and connect with them. However, when
the Selma speech he turns his face and body to his right side then left again and
again, rather than focus to the front and center. Front and center speaking is read
you/tube he actually leans his body from the waist up out towards the audience of
students as he makes each point. Typically candidates stay straight up and down to
show they are “Straight” and strong on issues.
Obama’s body language cues are different in debates and interviews than in
speeches. In Third televised debate Keys Obama becomes visibly angry he jabs out
his finger at the interviewer in a symbolic weapon even a one time at the end of the
interview. At one point he even puts up both hands with the forefingers out
symbolically firing as if there were guns in each hand pushes his hand out toward,
not just in a symbolic stop sign, but a more aggressive pushing away motion.
Nonverbally when can see he is an emotional man. Look for interviews like his
response to Bush speech. Watch his mouth goes up more on his left side. Our
emotional right hemisphere controls the left side of he face when there is a split
face and one side shows more than the other note which side. The mouth twisting
up to his left says he was feeling very emotional and though he wished to control it
he couldn’t.
One of the most interesting and dramatic aspects of Obama’s body and para
language is that it changes so much from speech to speech and location to location.
While many candidates slow down their speech slightly to charm their southern
audiences and increase their rate for New York news shows, Obama transforms.
For example, if you had never heard him speak before and watched him give his
Selma Alabama speech you would note his voice is extremely slow and takes on the
relaxed consonants and cadence of Alabama. When he is interviewed on1/10/2007
concerning his response to the Bush Speech his voice pace is face, his speech is
Remember what makes a candidate look honest and powerful to us when we view
him or her on the small screen, may be counter to what may look appropriate to the
audience he or she is speaking to when they are taped in front of a live audience.
unusual he turns his face and body to sides or moves his entire body towards the
audience to shows his desire to empathize and connect with them. However, when
the Selma speech he turns his face and body to his right side then left again and
again, rather than focus to the front and center. Front and center speaking is read
you/tube he actually leans his body from the waist up out towards the audience of
students as he makes each point. Typically candidates stay straight up and down to
Obama’s body language cues are different in debates and interviews than in
speeches. In Third televised debate Keys Obama becomes visibly angry he jabs out
his finger at the interviewer in a symbolic weapon even a one time at the end of the
interview. At one point he even puts up both hands with the forefingers out
symbolically firing as if there were guns in each hand pushes his hand out toward,
not just in a symbolic stop sign, but a more aggressive pushing away motion.
Nonverbally when can see he is an emotional man. Look for interviews like his
response to Bush speech. Watch his mouth goes up more on his left side. Our
emotional right hemisphere controls the left side of he face when there is a split
face and one side shows more than the other note which side. The mouth twisting
up to his left says he was feeling very emotional and though he wished to control it
he couldn’t.
At the beginning of the debates Obama was calm, blank eyed and seemed more
coached and less passionate and at times although he kept gesturing, his eyes
Obama needed to be more cool, collected and in control. McCain showed more
energy but overall did not seem presidential. He has more knowledge but his energy
was wasted in attacks, verbal and nonverbal. He walked toward towards Obama as
he attacked, but then would step back. Neither move showing strength. He often
showed snarly smirking facial expressions as he walked toward Obama and pointed
at him in little jabs. While discussing the Bush/Cheney-backed energy bill "stuffed
full" of goodies for the oil companies. "Know who voted for it? That one," he says,
not looking at Obama. "Know who voted against it? I did..." This was the biggest
nonverbal memorable moment in the debate and was all negative for McCain. A big
mistake.
Powerful debaters let attackers come to them and smile or act bored. Obama
smiled as if McCain's attack didn’t mean a thing. McCain needed to show his
confidence and superior experience knowledge but with the exception of a few
questions, like what we should do about Russia, his true deep knowledge was not
shown.
Obama attacked McCain during the debates by standing near his chair or walking
forward using his hand to make fists. He didn’t look at him, and that worked. I
didn’t like any of the attacks but Obama’s method of attack worked.
While McCain talked and Obama waited and listen for his next question, Obama sat
on his stool with one leg down up with his foot resting on the bar with his legs
a jazz CD. This was not the same pausing, awkward Obama. His coaching between
the debates was clear. Answer the questions quickly and strongly. Often Obama
leapt out of the chair and strode toward Moderator Brokaw as he answered
Brokaw's question. Obama loves a podium. He was more awkward in the town hall.
The media raves about Obama’s youthful virility and cHarisma. Yet all that normal
people see is a flabby bent man who emits a listless lack of vigor. Instead of
seeming like his 47 year old self, he seems like an old man who is sorry for what he
is about to do.
Look closely at Obama’s pallid face. It is sad and yet that sadness underscores a
certain evil. The lines of his face are those found on the face of a deceiver. He
looks like a man who is patiently waiting to exact revenge. He is not a loving man
been largely devoted to crafting, and chronicling, his own life by leaving out such
facts as his college grades, his birth certificate, why he has several bogus names
and his citizenship in Kenya and Indonesia.? What he offers is: Not things.
Not ideas. Not institutions. But himself. Those raving democrat hyenas who cheer
There is nothing wrong or even terribly odd about a man who hides his past and
illegally hides his citizenship, the media tells us. The media refuses to investigate
Obama and ignore his violation of campaign contribution laws. Even McCain, his PC
opponent is afraid of him because he is black. That too is insane. Why aren’t they
more worried that Hussein is laying claim to the job of crafting the coming history
of the United States. A leapof such audacity by a criminal is odd. The air of unease
at the Democratic convention this week was not just a result of the Clinton
psychodrama. The deeper anxiety was that the party was nominating a man who
claimed many gifts but was not able to show them nor was he able to display even a
guard of a dozen mates from his Vietnam days surrounded him on the podium
are the norm. The roster of fellow soldiers or fellow senators who could
from personal experience vouch for John McCain is rather long. At a less
partisan date in the calendar, that roster might even include Democrats Russ
Feingold and Edward Kennedy, with whom John McCain has worked to fashion
important legislation.
Eerily missing at the Democratic convention this year were people of stature
say: 'I know Barack Obama. I've been with Barack Obama.
Hillary Clinton could have said something like that. She and Obama had,
nomination. During her convention speech, you kept waiting for her to offer
just one line of testimony: I have come to know this man, to admire this
man, to see his character, his courage, his wisdom, his judgment. Whatever.
Anything.
Instead, nothing. She of course endorsed him. But the endorsement was
Clinton's withholding the 'I've come to know this man' was neither vindictive nor
didn't do it, no one else would. Because there are inherent deficiencies in
Obama's character. At the least, it is the reflection of a young, outsider life with
Who was there to speak about the real Barack Obama? His wife. She could tell
you about Hussein the father, the husband and the family man, But Michele doesn’t
sincere way. Her voice frequently chokes with anti-semitic and anti-white hatred.
She is one of those loud hate-filled and obnoxious black women that is found on
every bus, aircraft or train. People avoid most black females because of their evil
threatening manner. Such avoidance reinforces them as they warply assume that
white people are afraid of them. Well are you, punk? So any boring study of
Hussein the liar and straw man only takes you so far.
Who is to testify to that? Hillary's husband on night three did scream that
patron's virtues, such as the fact that he had 'reached across party lines
to ... keep nuclear weapons out of the hands of terrorists.' But securing
pie. The measure was so minimal that it passed by voice vote and received
near zero media coverage. Hussein did not actually keep nuclear weapons out of the
hands of terrorists he just got on the bus, up front, because his media advisors
aisle to work with him on ethics reform, a collaboration Obama boasted about
in the Saddleback debate? 'In fact,' reports the Annenberg Political Fact
Check, 'the two worked together for barely a week, after which McCain
So where are the colleagues? The buddies? The political or spiritual soul
mates? His most important spiritual adviser and mentor was Jeremiah Wright.
But that crazy black nazi is out. Then there's William Ayers, the prominent and
murderous terrorist who has had his picture made recently standing on a US flag.
The traitor Ayers, with whom Hussein served on Marxist directed “board” ? The
rest of the story is hushed up. He's out. Where are the others?
The oddity of the very undemocratic convention was that its central figure was
He stranger with whom the slutty Democrats have had a torrid affair. Having
slowly woken up, they see the ring and wonder who exactly they married last night.
Meanwhile, what is Obama’s bullet-point message? He doesn’t really have one. He’s
spent the past months giving detailed speeches about seconadry or teriary
subjects like public education policy. His refusal to speak about important issues
like his own veracity, legitimacy and ability are not admirable. Thank God the 15-
second sound-bite version of this speech doesn’t register with those casual voters
the same way McCain’s sound bites do. But will God intervene to save us. Where was
he when the same Marxists seized Russia less than 100 years ago? Glowing reviews
from education policy think tanks really aren’t going to do Obama much good right
now. Isn’t Ayers the terrorist a well received felon of the American socialist
What’s worse, Obama’s delivery on the stump and when facing the press has been
terrible. He shows strikingly little passion, litters his remarks with “uhs” and
stretches out every fourth or fifth word in a way that deflates the impact of his
sentences. But his biggest sin is that he lacks a simple, index-card justification for
his candidacy, the kinds of powerful and understandable themes that McCain belts
out with such intensity several times a day. Why does Obama want to be president?
Those busy commuters hearing him for a few seconds on their car radio have no
idea. They are told: “Listen bastard. Vote for Obama or you are a racist who will
suffer!” They cringe and look away in sheer terror. These poor excuses for
Not that all is lost for Obama. The voters who will decide this election, for the
most part, still like him because the media says he is likable and adoration of
Hussein is only instinctive. It is a sick and ugly love they place on the altar of the
new Archon. Yet, it is something that most recent Democratic nominees have not
had going for them and they think its great. And they are still inclined to throw
the G.O.P. out of the White House. But they also like McCain and they also are
inclined to believe that he’s not a typical Republican. The difference, for now, is
that McCain is making a much stronger and clearer case to them than Obama is.
Look at the face and body language of Hussein Obama there is nothing about the
Analysts went through the archives and found that, even on the rare occasion of an
Obama-related joke, it was usually at the expense of someone else, such as Hillary
When a presenter on New York's public radio station appealed to his usually
talkative listeners to ring in with their favorite Obama joke, the lines went dead.
Various excuses have been supplied, some more convincing than others.
Jon Stewart, liberal media pin-up and host of the The Daily Show, said that when
he'd recently tried a Hussein joke, he had met with such dry mouthed and
terrorized audience resistance that he had told them: "You know, you're allowed to
laugh at him." Thank you media freak for giving me permission to react.
There is terror afoot in America. It is the irrational stupid terror of the weak and
and audiences are uneasy about making fun of a black man. They don’t want to be
called racist. In other words these people have accepted blacks as some type of
sacrosanct race, above accountability for anything they do. The consequences of
such thinking will raise an African master race in America that will ruin the lives of
millions of white people afraid to criticize unfair treatment or stand up for their
rights.
The fanatic defenders of obama and the black will to dominate by proclaiming that
Obama is too new, too popular and, most of all, just too uncomedic. If he makes it
Yeah, for how long will the rat change his spots?I'll hold my breath in anticipation
of uproarious laughter.
A new analysis of Obama's voice patterns and the delivery of his speeches has
been made available . The analysis found the Democratic candidate “somewhat
"In all topics Mr Obama displays a similar worried, serious-looking facial pattern.
Even when talking about more positive subjects, his facial expressions do not signal
positive affective states," said a report on the analysis, undertaken by the Vox
The institute reviewed footage of Obama's speeches and those of the Republican candidate, John
McCain. It relied on footage from four speeches conveying a range of emotions, as well as
digitised voice samples, to rate the effectiveness of the two candidates in connecting with
"There is an element of the fact that he is on the edges of his comfort zone here,"
McBrien said. "Going into a presidential campaign is not something he has done
before, and you could say it is written all over his face."
Despite that failing, Obama was the clear winner against McCain in the oratorical
contest. The result is unsurprising, since McCain's own campaign team has gone to
some effort to conceal his limitations as a speaker. A person with a speech defect
could out talk McCain, as long as he is black! The Republican is restricted in his
range of motion because of injuries sustained during the Vietnam war. He tends to
keep his hands by his side when he speaks. Its payback for serving his country. The
McCain has had problems adapting to the Autocue, that staple of public speaking.
He refuses to learn how to adapt to.On the campaign trail he has favoured smaller
venues, where he can take questions from audiences, rather than the pompous
venues and Church of Zion preacher speeches that have become Obama's
signature. All of Obama’s siganature glares, ape brow stares and sarcasm is ignored