You are on page 1of 7

Distressed Debt Investing: Trade Claims Primer

10/29/11 8:38 PM

DISTRESSED DEBT INVESTING


This blog will try to dissect distressed debt investing, up and down the capital structure. We will look at current distressed debt situations, try to explain the ins and outs of how decisions are made in the distressed debt world, probably rant a few times about positions that are working against me, and hopefully enlighten some readers.

LABELS 10.26.2010

SUBSCRIBE

2009 distressed debt (3) 2010 distressed debt review (1) 2011 distressed debt market (1) 2011 distressed debt outlook (1) abitibibowater (2) acas (1) adequate protection (1) advanced distressed debt concepts (18) AIG (1) Alden Global (1) atp (1) balance sheet analysis (2) bank debt (3) Bill Ackman (2) blockbuster (1) book recommendation (1) Canyon Partners (1) cash (1) CCC index returns (1) cds auctions (1) chrysler (2) CLO (1) concepts (2) credit agreements (1) credit bidding (1) credit markets (1) dayton superior (1) debt exchanges (1) distressed debt (42) distressed debt advertisement (1)

Trade Claims Primer


It gives me great pleasure to introduce a new contributor to Distressed Debt Investing, Joshua Nahas, principal of Wolf Capital Advisors. Wolf Capital is a Philadelphia based advisory firm focused on distressed debt, corporate restructuring, corporate finance advisory and capital raising services. Wolf provides advisory services to hedge funds and private equity funds on distressed investing and provides restructuring services to debtors as well as creditor committees. In his first post, Josh provides a primer on the sometimes esoteric field of trade claims trading and investing. This is a must read for all distressed debt investors. Enjoy!

Subscribe in a Reader Subscribe by Email


DDIC LINK

HEDGE FUND RESUME SERVICES

Trade Claims Primer


Introduction While bank lenders and bondholders generally represent the largest portion of debtors pre- petition claims, upon filing there is a large constituency of other creditors who also possess claims against the debtor at various levels of priority within the capital structure. Because the sale, assignment and transfer of ownership of these claims are not considered securities, securities trading laws do not apply. The lack of uniformity and active market for these claims makes the instruments less liquid and transparent, thereby providing an opportunity for outsize returns for those willing to perform the necessary due diligence and shoulder the liquidity risk. Vendor claims generally trade at a 10-20% discount to other wise pari passu securities and therefore present a potential arbitrage opportunity for investors. The typical vendor does not wish, or may not be financially able, to wait months or possibly years to receive his money and is usually sufficiently motivated to sell his claim at a discount. A distressed investors may also purchase trade claims as a way to obtain strategic advantage in a restructuring. By gaining control of a larger share of a companys General Unsecured Claims (GUCs), a sophisticated distressed investor can gain leverage to influence negotiations with the Debtor and other Creditors. By purchasing trade claims at a discount to the unsecured debt he already owns, the investor also lowers the effective cost basis of his investment (assuming trade and bonds will receive the same consideration in the reorganization). In addition, if the claims pool is large enough an investor can set up a capital structure arbitrage trade by going long a trade claim and short pari passu unsecured bonds of the same company. In structuring such a trade, one must ensure that the bond and the claim are at the same entity and that the bond does not have any guarantees or claims on subsidiaries that might make it more valuable. For instance in the case of Nortel Networks, their North American bonds issued at Nortel Networks Inc (NNI) had guarantees from their Canadian parent which the trade claims of NNI did not. Thus, one had to segregate the value of the North American and Canadian operations to determine the value of an NNI claim. Fortunately in this case there were bonds issued at the Canadian parent Nortel Networks Corp (NNC) that did not have recourse to NNI, so one could subtract the value of an NNC bond from an NNI bond to find the implied value of an NNI claim. Many times this is not the case and one needs to try and apportion the value using information available in the companys financial statements. If the company has subsidiaries that are not guarantors of its debt then it will segregate the financials of the guarantor and nonguarantor subs. Also, one may look to segment reporting of revenue and EBITDA and attempt estimate how much value may be attributable to the various entities. In a scenario where the investor faces a great deal of uncertainty over valuation and how it will
ARCHIVE WHAT I AM READING THIS MONTH DISTRESSED INVESTING RESOURCES

Bankruptcy Dockets

Steve Jobs Biography The Most Important Thing The Four Steps to an Epiphany
MY OTHER BLOGS

The Merger Arbitrage Blog Hedge Fund Resumes and Careers Value Investing Blog

2011 (83) 2010 (133) Dec (8) Nov (9) Oct (12) Distressed Debt Case Study: ABH / Bowater Warren Buffett's Successor Trade Claims Primer Reminder: European Investing in Distressed Debt Fo... Hedge Fund Letter: Greenstone Value Fund Harrah's Files for IPO (HET) Distressed Debt Investors Club Update Distressed Debt Investors Club

http://www.distressed-debt-investing.com/2010/10/trade-claims-primer_26.html

Page 1 of 7

Distressed Debt Investing: Trade Claims Primer

10/29/11 8:38 PM
in Institutional In... Notes from the Ira Sohn West Research Conference Distressed Debt Investing Interviews Simon Davies European Distressed Debt Conference Special Offer Post Reorg Equity - Visteon Revisited (VSTOV) Sep (13) Aug (14) Jul (12) Jun (12) May (6) Apr (12) Mar (14)

distressed debt analysis (14) distressed debt book reviews (2) distressed debt case study (7) distressed debt conference (9) distressed debt exchange (1) distressed debt ideas (7) distressed debt interview (6) distressed debt investing (21) distressed debt investing concepts (7) distressed debt investing reading list (1) Distressed Debt Investors Club (15) distressed debt news (4) distressed debt notes (2) distressed debt portfolio management (3) distressed debt research (5) Distressed Debt: Tembec (1) distressed investing (1) distressed investing news (1) double dip bankruptcy claim (1) due diligence (1) emerging manager hedge fund series (3) emerging manager series (1) equitable subordination (1) European Distressed Debt (2) European Distressed Debt Conference (1) examples (2) fairpoint (1) fraudulent conveyance (1)

be attributed amongst various entities, he must bid an appropriate discount to compensate for the risk. Types of Claims A Claim is a right to payment, whether that right is fixed, liquidated, potential or contingent (i.e., based on the outcome of litigation). Claims can fall into different categories: priority, secured, unsecured, contingent, liquidated, disputed or matured. The most common claim to arise out of a bankruptcy filing is a vendor claim or trade claim as they are more commonly known. These claims arise due to the fact that a companys suppliers ship goods on credit ranging anywhere from 30-90 days. When a company files for bankruptcy it likely to be in arrears on its accounts payable, this increases the amount of debt on its balance sheet (AP), thereby increasing the tradeable instruments in the debtors obligations. While trade claims are the most common, there several other types of claims that arise from a bankruptcy filing which provide potential investment opportunities. These include:

Contract Rejection Damage Claims: Damages resulting from the termination of contracts under Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code. Deficiency Claims: Secured claims that are under collateralized result in a deficiency claim under Section 506 of the Bankruptcy Code for the portion of the claim where there is insufficient collateral securing the claim. Pension/OPEB Claims: Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBAs), Defined Benefit Pension Plans and other employee benefits that are terminated pursuant to Sections 1113 and 1114 of the Bankruptcy Code give rise to unsecured claims. Contingent Claims: Claims that may result from pending lawsuits, environmental damages or other contingent events. Some examples of cases where large contingent claims were involved include the asbestos cases such as Owens Corning, Grace and Armstrong and environmental claims include cases such as Asarco and Tronox. Priority Claims: Generally include back taxes and unpaid employee wages and benefits, however, can also include lease deposits up to $2,452 and Gap Claims which arise when the Debtor is targeted in an Involuntary Bankruptcy Petition filed by one of its Creditors. All trade debts incurred in the period between the filing of the Involuntary Bankruptcy Petition and potential Entry of the Order for Relief by the Bankruptcy Court will be deemed to have a priority status. 503(b)9 Claims: These are claims for goods shipped within 20 days of a company filing for bankruptcy. Unlike other trade claims, these claims are accorded administrative status and are paid in full as long as the estate is administratively solvent. Reclamation Claims: Reclamation claims allow for the Creditor to reclaim the goods shipped to the Debtor. These claims arise under state law, 2-702(2) of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Once the Debtor files for bankruptcy protection, 546(c) of the Bankruptcy Code preserves a creditors state law reclamation rights, those rights are enhanced by the code and create additional requirements and defenses. The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA) expanded the reclamation period from 10 days to 45 days prior to a bankruptcy and to 20 days postpetition from 10 days previously. There are a number of requirements that must be met for these claims as well as potential defenses against such claims.

Feb (11) Jan (10) 2009 (114)

MOST POPULAR POSTS

Distressed Debt Reading List Distressed Debt Investors Club in Institutional Investor Distressed Debt Investors Club
CURRENTLY READING

Abnormal Returns Barel Karsan Controlled Greed Greenbackd How to Get a Hedge Fund Job Market Folly Merger Arbitrage Value Investing Blog

Proof of Claim In order for the Creditors claim to be paid he must file a Proof of Claim (POC) with the court. This is done by filling out Official Form 10 within 90 days from the Section 341 meeting of creditors and filing it with the Bankruptcy Court. The date past which a claim can no longer be filed is known as the Claims Bar Date, and claims past this date generally will not be paid, although it is possible to appeal. The POC will have a Docket Stamp on it denoting the date of its filing. The POC must be signed by the creditor, include the amount of the claim, whether there is a perfected security interest and have attached to the POC documentation evidencing the claim such as invoices, purchase orders or contracts. Sample of Proof of Claim Form 10

http://www.distressed-debt-investing.com/2010/10/trade-claims-primer_26.html

Page 2 of 7

Distressed Debt Investing: Trade Claims Primer


g (1) gap bankruptcy (2) general motors (1) ggp (7) gm exchange (1) Greenstone (1) hedge fund jobs (1) hedge fund letter (10) high yield (5) high yield bubble (2) high yield returns (1) howard marks (2) idearc (1) insight health bankruptcy (1) ira sohn conference (5) ira sohn notes (1) Japan investing (1) kelly formula (1) Lehman (1) leveraged loans (1) Linked In (1) liquidations (1) list of distressed debt hedge funds (2) mark sellers (1) Marty Whitman (1) Michael Burry (3) michael milken (1) money manager interview (1) Nebraska Book (1) NewPage (1) non-agency rmbs (1) oaktree capital (1) Paulson (1) Perry Capital (2) Pershing Square (1) post reorg equities (5) q/a (1) Randy Smith (1) realogy (1)

10/29/11 8:38 PM

Sourcing Trade Claims Upon filing of its petition for bankruptcy, or within 14 days of filing, the Debtor is required to file its Schedule of Assets and Liabilties and its Statement of Financial Affairs (SOFA). The Schedules are the primary source used to locate claim holders. In practice the Debtor routinely is granted extensions to the filing of schedules and it can take some time before a potential investor has the requisite information in order to bid on a claim. Nevertheless, upon petition the Debtor must file a list containing the name, address and claim of the creditors that hold the 20 largest unsecured claims, excluding insiders. For a sophisticated trade claims investor it is possible to begin negotiations to purchase a claim utilizing this information, albeit without knowing whether the debtor is disputing the claim or if the amount of the claim at petition will be the same as what is listed on the Schedules. The Schedules also contain the name, address, amount of claim and whether that claim is, Contingent, Liquidated/Unliquidated or Disputed. Contingent claims are claims that may arise contingent upon an event taking place in the future, such as an adverse judgment in an ongoing lawsuit or claims related to remediation for environmental damages that are not fully know. A Liquidated Claim is a claim where the dollar amount is known. An Unliquidated Claim is one where the debtor has liability, but the exact monetary measure of that liability is unknown. A tort case where the Debtor has been found guilty, but where the amount of the liability has yet to be established would fall into this category. Disputed claims are claims where the Debtor is disputing the validity of the claim and intends to file an objection to the claim. This generally occurs later in the case in the form of an Omnibus Objection made by the debtor. Below is an example of a Debtors Schedule of Assets and Liabilities filed by Tronox Inc.

Purchasing a Trade Claim In examining the schedules it best to bid on an Allowed Claim. Under Section 502(a), a claim for which a proof of claim has been filed is deemed Allowed unless a party of interest (e.g. Bankruptcy Trustee, or the Debtor) objects to the claim, in which case the

http://www.distressed-debt-investing.com/2010/10/trade-claims-primer_26.html

Page 3 of 7

Distressed Debt Investing: Trade Claims Primer


restructuring (2) restructuring conference (1) revolvers (1) rouse bonds (1) sahm adrangi (5) Scion Capital (2) Seth Klarman (14) shipping (1) short ideas (1) six flags (3) Spansion (1) special situation stocks (1) spreads (1) superinvestor (1) systematic risks (1) terms (1) Third Avenue Credit (3) Third Point (2) tousa (1) trade claims (1) tronox (1) value investing (1) value investing concepts (1) Visteon (2) Warren Buffett (2)

10/29/11 8:38 PM

Bankruptcy Court will conduct a hearing to determine whether, or to what extent, the claim should be allowed. There are instances where the Debtor marks every claim on the schedule as disputed or contingent. This increases the risk and will required extra due diligence as well as the willingness to litigate if need be. Once a claim holder willing to sell has been located, the negotiation process for purchasing the claim begins. This process can take anywhere from a few days to several weeks depending on the complexity of the issues involved. Since the seller is not a capital markets participant, he may change his mind several times throughout the negotiation process and also increase his offer based on competing bids. Moreover, factors may come into play in the due diligence phase that require a re-pricing or cancellation of the trade altogether. If an investor is bidding on a disputed claim he will need to factor the risk that the claim might ultimately be disallowed into his bid price. In addition, he may want to reduce price of his bid to allow him to negotiate with the debtor for a reduction in claim size in exchange for a stipulation that the debtor will treat the claim as an Allowed Claim. Due Diligence Once an initial bid is agreed upon, the parties enter into a trade confirmation, subject to final due diligence. This phase again can take a few days to a few weeks depending on the issues involved. At this stage in the process the buyer will begin examining the documentation supporting the claim. This includes reviewing invoices, purchase orders, or other contracts in order to determine the validity of the claim. It is also necessary to reconcile the amounts on the invoices with what is filed on the POC and the Schedules. If the invoice is for less than what is listed on the POC or what is listed on the POC is less than on the schedules, the purchaser must reconcile these discrepancies before funding, or have the buyer agree to indemnification provisions should the claim be allowed at a lower amount. The purchaser must also confirm that the entity at which the claim he is purchasing is filed corresponds to the entity listed on the supporting invoices as well as have been filed prior to the Claims Bar Date. The claims purchase will be executed via a custom tailored contract known as a Purchase Sale Agreement (PSA). The PSA will contain provisions governing the transfer of the claim, Representations and Warranties and Indemnification provisions. The PSA will required the seller to provide Reps and Warranties on the ownership, validity and lack of any encumbrances on the claim. In addition, the PSA will contain Indemnification provisions, should the claim be impaired or disallowed . This means that if for some reason the purchaser of the claim needs to seek recourse because the seller misrepresented his claim or it was disallowed as a result of actions taken by the seller, , the purchaser must be able to rely on the counter party to indemnify him for his losses. If the counter party is financially unstable, not a well established enterprise, or is itself at

SUBSCRIBERS

risk of bankruptcy, then there is risk that he will not be able to perform his duties under the PSA. When the counter party is a publicly traded company, has, publicly issued debt or has a credit rating, it is fairly easy to do counter party due diligence. However, if the counter party is a small, private business, then counter party risk assessment becomes

TWITTER UPDATES

more difficult. One source of information is Dun & Bradstreet which compiles credit and other financial information on private businesses. In addition, the purchaser can and should ask for financial statements, bank statements, summary of tax returns and other information as needed to gain comfort with the counter partys credit worthiness. Should legal disputes arise the between the buyer and seller, the PSA should contain provisions for settling the disputes. It is common for the PSA to require disputes to be litigated under New York or Delaware law, courts which routinely handle complex commercial litigation. This also avoids being in the home town court of the seller of the claim. If the claim being purchased is from a foreign supplier whose country is a signatory to the NY Convention of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) arbitration, then the PSA should include provisions for disputes to be settled via arbitration as courts of signatory countries are required to enforce arbitration judgments conducted in accordance with ICC rules. Legal Issues Affecting Trade Claims There are several legal issues that can impact the value of a claim or cause the claim to be disallowed. The following is a brief summary of some of the major issues that need to be diligenced from a legal perspective before purchasing a claim. Equitable Subordination. If the seller of the claim aided and abetted fraud, insider trading or breach of fiduciary duty his claim may be equitably subordinated causing the priority

http://www.distressed-debt-investing.com/2010/10/trade-claims-primer_26.html

Page 4 of 7

Distressed Debt Investing: Trade Claims Primer

10/29/11 8:38 PM

On Sell Side Research... http://t.co/f43nuQkE


4 days ago

of the claim to be moved to the end of the priority chain. This has the effect of the claim being treated as equity, not debt. This risk is heightened when a claim is purchased from an insider and one must have strong reps and warranties from an insider that he has not aided and or abetted any malfeasance. The purchaser must also have indemnification provisions covering such breaches. It can be several months post closing of a trade that these issues are discovered and even longer until they are adjudicated. In order to minimize this risk seek to avoid purchasing claims of company, insiders or those where the relationship could be potentially deemed as insider. Avoidance Actions. When a company files for bankruptcy all payments made in the 90 days prior to bankruptcy (1 year for payments to insiders) are investigated as potential Preference Payments. A Preference Payment is the payment of a debt to one creditor rather than dividing the assets equally among all those to whom he/she/it owes money, often by making a payment to a favored creditor just before filing a petition to be declared bankrupt. The Bankruptcy Trustee has the power to Avoid (unwind) any payments that are deemed to be a Preference This is known as an Avoidance Action and the money is reclaimed by the bankruptcy estate . There are several criteria that are used to evaluate whether a payment was a Preference:
1. The transfer was "to or for the benefit of a creditor." 2. The transfer was made for or on account of an "antecedent debt"that is, a debt owed prior to the time of the transfer. 3. The debtor was insolvent at the time of the transfer. (Fraudulent Conveyance which has 2year look-back pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 548) 4. The transfer was made within 90 days before the date of the filing of the bankruptcy petition or was made between 90 days and one year before the date of the filing of the petition to an insider who had reasonable cause to believe that the debtor was insolvent at the time of the transfer. 5. The transfer has the effect of increasing the amount that the transferee would receive in a liquidation proceeding under chapter 7 of the bankruptcy law (11 U.S.C.A. 701 et seq.). 11 U.S.C.A. 547

CSFB's Special Situation Conference http://t.co/RKA3xKNr


8 days ago

Longacre's Vladimir Jelisavcic's Presentation on Dryships http://t.co/AbgHTphU


8 days ago

Randy Smith of Alden Global http://t.co/ZIODHaWE


11 days ago

What type of value investor are you? http://t.co/8BoMtLNe


18 days ago
Follow me on Twitter

However, Section 547(c) of the Bankruptcy Code contains exceptions for payments made in the ordinary course of business. The prior course of dealings between the parties, including the amount and timing of payments, and circumstances surrounding the payments, should be analyzed. Additionally, inquiries may be made into the collection activities or practices between the parties, whether the payments were designed to give the transferee an advantage over other creditors in bankruptcy, or whether there was any change in the status of the transferee such as the ability to obtain security in the event of nonpayment. If there has been any unusual pressure or collection activity by the creditor resulting in the payment, the payment would not be ordinary course of business. The transfer at issue is not required to be the type that occurs in every transaction between the parties. It is necessary only that the type of payment be somewhat consistent with prior dealings and transactions Closing the Trade Once the due diligence and legal review is complete, the PSA is finalized and the trade is executed via Delivery vs Payment (DVP) format. ). DVP occurs when, to complete a trade, there is a simultaneous exchange of securities, in this case they are not securities but the format is the same, for cash that ensures that delivery occurs if, and only if, payment occurs. To be true DVP, there must be an element of finality in the process, whereby neither side of the trade can unwind the transaction after settlement. The funds are then wired within one day of execution. Closing can occur anywhere from 10-30 days post initial confirmation of the trade. The standard practice is that once the trade has closed, the Transferee files a Notice of Transfer and Evidence of Transfer (supporting documentation to evidence the transfer of claim) with the Bankruptcy Court pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3001(e). Rule 3001(e) reads as follows:

Transferees trading on the scheduled amount prior to the filing of a POC must file a POC with court, although evidence of transfer is not required it recommend. Rule 3001(e) 1 Assignment of a claim after a POC has been filed requires both a Notice of Transfer and an Evidence of Transfer to be filed with court. 3001(e)2

http://www.distressed-debt-investing.com/2010/10/trade-claims-primer_26.html

Page 5 of 7

Distressed Debt Investing: Trade Claims Primer

10/29/11 8:38 PM

The clerk of the court or claims agent has the duty to notify the Transferor. The Transferor has 20 days to object to the transfer. Within 15-30 days post closing buyer follows up with claims agent to ensure claims register properly reflects the new owner of the claims. Conclusion Investing in trade claims provides a unique opportunity set for distressed investors who already understand the bankruptcy process, are familiar with analyzing complicated capital structures and understand inter-creditor issues. While trade claims are an illiquid market, they are also highly uncorrelated to the stock and equity markets making them attractive to distressed and special situation funds. Furthermore, it is possible in many cases to bid on claims at a discount to an established plan recovery for the reasons: stated earlier: that many trade creditors do not wish, or are unable, to wait for the exit from bankruptcy for payment. With that said the market has grown more competitive and sophisticated in the last several years, so do you due diligence and invest wisely.
Posted by Hunter Labels: trade claims

2 COMMENTS:
Frank, 11/08/2010 Thanks for an excellent breakdown on trade claims. My question is in regard to the treatment of LEASES: 1) In determining (A) the priority and (B) the amount of claims, is treatment of operating leases different than the treatment of capital leases? 2) On a claims basis, are capital leases "valued" differently than other financial debt? That is, is the nominal amount of a capital lease 100 cents on the dollar, like any other piece of financial debt (loan, bond) or is it different and if so, why? 3) How do you put a nominal value on operating leases (esp before filing of the SOFA)? Do you have a rule of thumb for estimating their value, like say, multiplying the next three years operating lease commitments (in the notes) by 3 or something? What's a good way of doing it? 4) Whats the rule of thumb for the nominal value of an operating lease that is rejected vs. one that is not rejected? 5) Do you consider leases to be roughly the same as trade claims in distressed debt investing or... how interesting are lease claims in such procedures? Sorry for the laundry list of questions but I tried to be as specific as I could. THANK YOU VERY MUCH... Frank

Frank, 11/08/2010 And sorry, one more question: 6) In my limited experience with post petitions (LandAmerica Financial), the trade claims were at the OpCo(s) while the leases were at the HoldCo. Is that typical? (I was kinda surprised that there weren't more leases imputed to the Opcos...)

Post a Comment

Newer Post Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Home

Older Post

http://www.distressed-debt-investing.com/2010/10/trade-claims-primer_26.html

Page 6 of 7

Distressed Debt Investing: Trade Claims Primer

10/29/11 8:38 PM

EMAIL

ABOUT ME

DONATE TO DISTRESSED DEBT INVESTING

hunter [at] distressed-debt-investing [dot] com

I have spent the majority of my career as a value investor. For the past 7 years, I have worked on the buy side as a distressed debt and high yield investor.

Disclaimer
This website is about distressed debt investing. Under no circumstances is this an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy securities discussed on this site. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise. Distressed-Debt-Investing.com, its editor and/or related parties may have positions in companies discussed. All data, information and opinions are subject to change without notice.

http://www.distressed-debt-investing.com/2010/10/trade-claims-primer_26.html

Page 7 of 7

You might also like