Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Based on example 3.1 in Wayne W. Daniel textbook in page 86. Russel et.al (E1) reported the stroke index values shown I Table 3.2 for patients admitted to the myocardinal-infarction research unit of a university hospital. fWe wish to know whether these data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that the medians of the two populations represented by the sample data are different. Let Stroke-index values, milliliters, for patients admitted to the myocardial-infarction research unit of a university hospital Diagnosis Anterior transmural infarction and anterior necrosis (X) 25 25 17 26 18 30 24 21 13 30 20 23 26 12 20 37 9 17 37 20 11 32 16 31 46 20 25 17 36 54 8 26
ANSWER
Step 1: Classify the sample observation as sample 1 and 2. Anterior transmural infarction and anterior necrosis as sample X Interior transmural infarction and interior necrosis as sample Y Assumption: this data consists of two independent random samples X and Y. H0: MX=MY H1: MXMY (claim) Step 2: Find the median from the sample value. 8,9,11,12,13,13,16,17,17,17,18,19,20,20,20,20,20,21,21,23,24,25,25,25,26,26,26,28,29,30,30, 30,30,31,31,32,32,36,37,37,38,38,41,42,43,46,54,68
Find the sample of observation in each sample falling above and below. 8,9,11,12,13,16,17,17,17,18,20,20,20,20,21,23,24,25,25,25, 26,26,26,30,30,31,32,36,37,37,46, 54 The number of observation from sample X falling above the median (A) =12 The number of observation from sample X falling below the median (C) =20 13,19,20,21,28,29,30,30,31,32,38,38,41,42,43,68 The number of observation from sample Y falling above the median (B) =12 The number of observation from sample Y falling below the median (D) =4
Step 3: Draw the contingency table. Relationship to 25.5 Anterior transmural Inferior infarction Above Below Total anterior necrosis 12 20 32 and infarction interior necrosis 12 4 16 transmural Total and 24 24 48
T=
Step 5: Making decision. We are using , the critical value from standard normal distribution are . Since
-2.45 are in the critical region, so we reject the null hypotheses. By using P-value method we get:
P-value = 0.0142 < 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis. Step 6: Conclusion.
Since we reject the null hypotheses, we have enough evidence to support the claim that the two population medians are not equal.
Find the sample of observation in Method A falling above and below. 41,41,42,44,44,45,45,48,51,52,52,52,58,60,61 The number of observation from sample X falling above the median (A) =8 The number of observation from sample X falling below the median (C) =7
Find the sample of observation in Method B falling above and below. 36,37,39,40,43,46,47,53,55,56 The number of observation from sample Y falling above the median (B) =5 The number of observation from sample Y falling below the median (D) =5
Method A (X) 8 7 15
Method B (Y) 5 5 10
Total 13 12 25
T=
Step 5: Making decision. We are using , the critical value from standard normal distribution are . Since
0.1634 are not in the critical region, so we do not reject the null hypotheses. By using P-value method we get:
Step 6: Conclusion.
Since we do not reject the null hypotheses, we do not have enough evidence to support the claim that the two population medians are not equal.
Step 1: Classify the sample observation as sample 1 and 2. Educational handicapped (EH) as sample X Educable mentally retarded (EMR) as sample Y Assumption: this data consists of two independent random samples X and Y. H0: MX=MY H1: MXMY (claim)
Step 2: Find the median from the sample value. 60,62,62,65,65,66,68,68,68,68,70,70,70,70,70,70,71,71,71,71,71,72,72,72,72,72,72,72,73,74, 74,75,76,76,77,78,78,78,79,79,80,82,87,88,88
Find the sample of observation in sample X falling above and below. 68,70,70,70,71,71,71,72,72,72,72,72,73,74,74,75,77,78,78,79,80,82,87,88,88 The number of observation from sample X falling above the median (A) =13 The number of observation from sample X falling below the median (C) =12
Find the sample of observation in sample Y falling above and below. 60,62,62,65,65,66,68,68,68,70,70,70,71,71,72,72,76,76,78,79
The number of observation from sample Y falling above the median (B) =4 The number of observation from sample Y falling below the median (D) =16
Step 3: Draw the contingency table. Relationship to 72 Above Below Total Educational handicapped (X) 13 12 25 Educable retarded (Y) 4 16 20 mentally Total 17 28 45
T=
Step 5: Making decision. We are using , the critical value from standard normal distribution are . Since
Step 6: Conclusion. Since we reject the null hypotheses, we have enough evidence to support the claim that the two population medians are not equal.
Nonconformists as sample Y Assumption: this data consists of two independent random samples X and Y. H0: MX=MY H1: MXMY (claim)
Find the sample of observation in sample X falling above and below. 41,42,44,48,49,53,55,55,56 The number of observation from sample X falling above the median (A) =8 The number of observation from sample X falling below the median (C) =1
Find the sample of observation in Method B falling above and below. 45,48,57,58,59,59,59,61,68 The number of observation from sample Y falling above the median (B) =7 The number of observation from sample Y falling below the median (D) =2 Step 3: Draw the contingency table. Relationship to 55 Above Below Total Conformists (X) 1 8 9 Nonconformists (Y) 7 2 9 Total 8 10 18
T=
Step 5: Making decision. We are using , the critical value from standard normal distribution are . Since
-2.8460 are in the critical region, so we reject the null hypotheses. By using P-value method we get:
P-value = 0.0044 < 0.01, we reject the null hypothesis. Step 6: Conclusion. Since we reject the null hypotheses, we have enough evidence to support the claim that the two population medians are not equal.