Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Quant v. Qual
Tensions Goals quant reliability, validity Quality in qualitative research trust, belief, coherence Perhaps need for new language?
Mix methods (to move to similar senses of value as quant generalizability) Some warnings re: mixing methods though Multiple realities can get trumped/lost/obscured (e.g., Barbour 1998) Especially when constructivist paradigms are operating
Triangulation, reflexivity
Solutions to qualitative handlings of validity Compare this reading with the conclusion of Wainwright that reflexive practice is best
qualitative (SocScis) and general/academic acceptance via improved ways of handling validity/reliability researcher detachment researched voice accepted as unquestioningly valid/legit
what is gained...
something of the scepticism of positivistic and pos positivistic view of QUAL has dissipated
what is lost...
by morphing the handling of validity in qualitative erms into more social science based methods ha ost the possibility for genuine CRITICAL work
no way to problematize our subjects discourse; it must be taken as is, an objective measure of a phenomena
moments of awareness can yield conflict with historical givens, status quo,and thus the only possibility for change, even conciseness
empiricism,(post-)positivism: enjoys a privileged discourse consensus (consciousness) accepts their moral legitimacy
reign
enlightenment, reason, rationality & empiricism; modernity idealism now seen as dangerous spirituality or even sophistry; a contra- discourse that is ultimately destructive
definitions of valid research necessarily changes ov ime progress metaphors standards, professionalisation, growth, accumulation of scientific understanding and techniques good science now, vs. 19-c, or even 1950s
herefore: we cannot objectively measure/count/describe all such attempts are situationally constructed
people in context likely are not conscious of traditional pressures to conform and adopt status
so what to do
f I cant count things, describe them and treat these seriously as found (cant take context for granted)
f I cant find (or worse, make) meaning via traditio methods and appeals to validity?
REFLEXIVE practice
pp. 10-17 (last section) walks you through setting u and doing a qualitative research project via reflexiv practice