Method Of Rerefining Used Lubricating Oil Patent 4342645

Abstract
Used oil is refined by distillation to remove a volatile forecut followed by further distillation with recirculation provisions to obtain the desired fractions of lubricating oil products while reducing the vaporization temperature of the oil. The recycle effect tends to reduce coking and cracking while providing a greater recovery of lubricating oil products through the carrier effect of the light ends.In one embodiment of the invention, a waste oil feedstock has water, gasoline and other similarly volatile components removed in a first stage evaporator (16). Heavier fuel, such as fuel oil is then removed in a second stage evaporator (28). A light lube oil fraction is then obtained by distillation with a third stage wiped-film evaporator (40). Finally, a heavy lube oil fraction is obtained by distillation of the bottoms from the evaporator (40) with a fourth-stage evaporator (64).
See more...

Inventors: Laird C. Fletcher; Harold J. Beard Assignee: Delta Central Refining, Inc. Primary Examiner: Tufariello; T. M. Assistance Examiner: Attorney, Agent of firm: Winburn & Gray, Ltd. Filed Date: 10/28/1980 Issue Date: 8/3/1982 US Patent Application:

06/202,019 Patent number: 4342645 Primary Class: Mineral Oils: Processes And Products (208/184) Method of rerefining used lubricating..., Fletcher, et al., Laird C. Fletcher, Harold J. Beard, Application number 06 202-019, Mineral Oils: Processes And Products, used oil, lubricating oil, waste oil, lube oil, oil fraction, heat exchanger, Work File, petroleum products, MINERAL OILS, Publication Date

Citations
Patent Number 1584588 2583620 3024171 3173859 3305478 3450627 3607731 3620967 3625881 3763036 3773658 3791965 3864242 3870625 3879282 3919076 3923643 3929626 3954602 3980551 3985642 4021333 Title N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Method of rerefining oil by distillation and Owner Acheson Wrightson Bone Chambers Gilson et al. Johnson et al. Gulick Gulick Chambers et al. Jordan et al. Vu et al. Fitzsimons et al. Watanabe Wielezynski Johnson Cutler et al. Lewis et al. Button et al. Troesch et al. Wolk Friel et al. Habiby et al. Issue Date 5/1/1926 1/1/1952 3/1/1962 3/1/1965 2/1/1967 6/1/1969 9/1/1971 11/1/1971 12/1/1971 10/1/1973 10/1/1973 2/1/1974 2/1/1975 3/1/1975 4/1/1975 11/1/1975 12/1/1975 12/1/1975 5/1/1976 9/1/1976 10/1/1976 5/1/1977

4029569 4033859 4038176 4045330 4071438 4073719 4073720 4097369 4101414 4105538 4124492 4140212 4191640

extraction Process for reclaiming spent motor oil Ivey, Jr. Thermal treatment of used petroleum oils Davidson et al. Oil soluble polymeric flocculants Noren et al. Process for regenerating lubricating oils Avrillon et al. Method of reclaiming waste oil by distillation and O'Blasny extraction Process for preparing lubricating oil from used Whisman et al. waste lubricating oil Method for reclaiming waste lubricating oils Whisman et al. Process for reclaiming used hydrocarbon oils Ebel et al. Rerefining of used motor oils Kim et al. Process for the refining of used motor oils and Mattox products thereof Process for the reclamation of waste hydrocarbon Fung et al. oils Cyclonic distillation tower for waste oil rerefining O'Blasny et al. process Dual pressure fractionation of hydrocarbons Chess

6/1/1977 7/1/1977 7/1/1977 8/1/1977 1/1/1978 2/1/1978 2/1/1978 6/1/1978 7/1/1978 8/1/1978 11/1/1978 2/1/1979 3/1/1980

Referenced By
Patent Number Title Water soluble graft copolymers of lignin, methods 4931527 of making the same and uses therefore 4431524 Process for treating used industrial oil Process for treating used motor oil and synthetic 4432865 crude oil 4941967 Process for re-refining spent lubeoils 5382328 Installation for processing waste oil 7208079 Process for the treatment of waste oils Owner Meister Norman Norman Mannetje, et al. Drespa, et al. Fakhri Issue Date 6/5/1990 2/14/1984 2/21/1984 7/17/1990 1/17/1995 4/24/2007

Overview

Ads by Google

Raised Drill Platform

www.matsystems.ca

Drill Platform That Eliminates Any Seasonal Constraints. Call Us Now!

Grease & Lubricants Mfgr

www.jet-lube.co.uk/

Industrial lubricant manufacture UK Supports Oilfield and HHD drilling

Natural Gas Potential

WealthWire.com/Natural_Gas

T. Boone is working to break the record for gas wells. Investor rpt

Lubrication Specialists
Solve all lubrication problems Oil analysis & Supporting Products
www.mylubemanager.com

Lubricant Additive
english

medium based sulfurized calcium alkylphenate T121

Related Docs
Title The Re-refining of Used Lubricating Oils lubricating oil msds144835 MIL-PRF-3150D Lubricating Oil_ Lubricating-Oil-Purifier-906 Method of producing lubricating oil Wear Metals in Lubricating Oil Patent Method for producing lubricating oil ECOMARK CRITERIA FOR LUBRICATING OILS Method for producing lubricating oil INTERLABORATORY STUDY Lubricating oil Shared By wulinqing msds pengxiang suchenfz iupon13 liaoqinmei cuiliqing iupon13 junglelboy424 iupon13 pptfiles Views 42 47 26 4 5 0 8 0 31 0 41

IIS00L01 Waste Lubricating Oil Recycling Technology Petroleum Lubricating Oil and Grease Manufacturing Petroleum Lubricating Oil and Grease Manufacturing INTERLABORATORY STUDY Lubricating oil IIS00L01 Lubricating Oil Recycling Systems, Hydraulic Oil Purifiers

qyx19901 USCensus ubv18185 hcj oilrecycler

2 43 14 7 204

Patent Text
Claims We claim: 1. A method of rerefining used oil containing lubricating oil comprising: (a) removing from the used oil a volatile forecut to provide a resulting oil containing lubricating oil; and (b) evaporating the resulting oil in an evaporator unit at reduced pressure, greater than about 2.0 millimeters of mercury, to form heavy and light fractions, with a portion of said light fraction recycled and mixed into the resulting oil prior to the resulting oil entering the evaporator unit, in a quantity effective for lowering the vaporization temperature of the resulting oil to reduce the tendency of fouling, coking and cracking of the resulting oil during evaporation. 2. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the evaporator unit is an agitated thin film evaporator. 3. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the evaporator unit is a wiped-film evaporator. 4. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein substantially all of the water, gasoline, and other similarly volatile components that may be present in the used oil have been removed prior to step (a) of claim 30. 5. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the volatile forecut has a flash point less than about 116.degree. C. 6. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the evaporation in step (b) of claim 1 occurs in the temperature range of about 265.degree. F. to 480.degree. F. 7. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the ratio of the resulting oil to the light fraction recycled into the resulting oil is about 4:1.

8. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the amount of the light fraction that is recycled is between about 5% and 300% by weight of the resulting oil. 9. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said light fraction is light lube oil and the method further comprises evaporating at reduced pressure the heavy fraction obtained from the evaporation of the resulting oil to form a heavy lube oil fraction and a residual fraction. 10. The method as recited in claim 8 wherein a portion of the heavy lube oil fraction is recycled and mixed into the heavy fraction prior to evaporation thereof in a quantity effective for lowering the vaporization temperature of the heavy fraction to reduce the tendency of coking and cracking of the heavy fraction during evaporation thereof. 11. The method as recited in claim 9 wherein the heavy fraction is evaporated in an agitated thin film evaporator. 12. The method as recited in claim 9 wherein the heavy fraction is evaporated in a wiped-film evaporator. 13. The method as recited in claim 9 wherein the evaporation of the resulting oil occurs in the range of about 2 millimeters of mercury to 5 millimeters of mercury absolute. 14. The method as recited in claim 9 wherein the evaporation of the heavy fraction occurs in the range of about 0.5 millimeters of mercury to 3.0 millimeters of mercury absolute. 15. The method as recited in claim 1 or 12 wherein the removal in step (a) of claim 1 occurs at reduced pressure in the temperature range of about 250.degree. F. to 500.degree. F. 16. A method for rerefining used lubricating oil comprising: (a) removing from the used oil a volatile forecut to provide a resulting oil that contains lubricating oil; (b) evaporating the resulting oil in an evaporator at reduced pressure in the range of about 2.0 to 5.0 millimeters of mercury absolute and within a temperature range of about 265.degree. F. to 500.degree. F. to form a heavy fraction and a light lube oil fraction, said light lube fraction having a viscosity of between about 60 and 200 SSU at 100.degree. F., with a portion of said light lube oil fraction being recycled and mixed into the resulting oil, prior to evaporation thereof, in a quantity effective for lowering the vaporization temperature of the resulting oil to reduce the tendency of fouling, coking and cracking of the resulting oil during evaporation;

(c) evaporating the heavy fraction in an evaporator obtained from the evaporation of the resulting oil to form a heavy lube fraction and a residual fraction, the evaporation of the heavy fraction occurring at reduced pressure within a range of between about 0.5 millimeters of mercury and 3.0 millimeters of mercury absolute and within a temperature range of about 315.degree. F. and 600.degree. F., with a portion of the heavy lube fraction being recycled and mixed into the heavy fraction, prior to evaporation thereof, in a quantity effective for lowering the vaporization temperature of the heavy fraction to reduce the tendency of coking and cracking of the heavy fraction during evaporation thereof. 17. The method as recited in claim 16 wherein the heavy fraction is evaporated with a wiped-film evaporator. 18. The method as recited in claim 16 wherein the amount of light lube oil fraction that is recycled is between about 5% and 300% by weight of the resulting oil and the amount of heavy lube fraction that is recycled is between about 5% and 300% by weight of the heavy fraction. 19. In a process for rerefining used lubricating oil where it is desired to vary the range of lube oil evaporated in an evaporation step, the improvement comprising evaporating in an evaporator the used lubricating oil to form heavy and light fractions at reduced pressure within the range of about 2.0 to 5.0 millimeters of mercury absolute and at elevated temperature within the range of about 265.degree. to 480.degree. F., with a portion of said light fraction being recycled and mixed into the used oil prior to evaporation thereof, in a quantity effective for lowering the vaporization temperature to a desired level for reducing the tendency of fouling, coking and cracking of the used oil during evaporation and to vaporize a desired amount of used oil. 20. In a process for rerefining used lubricating oil, a method of lowering the vaporization temperature of the used lubricating oil and of reducing coking, cracking and fouling tendencies comprising evaporating in an evaporator the used lubricating oil to form heavy and light fractions in which a portion of the light fraction is recycled and mixed into the used oil prior to evaporation of the used oil in a quantity effective for vaporizing a desired amount of the used lubricating oil feed and lowering the effective vaporization temperature thereof. Description TECHNICAL FIELD This invention relates to the rerefining of used lubricating oil. More particularly, this invention relates to the rerefining of used lubricating oil by distillation. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to a process for the reclamation and rerefining of waste hydrocarbon lubricating oils. In particular, the invention provides a process which is

simple and reduces coking, cracking and fouling tendencies that are inherent in other rerefining processes. Large and increasing volumes of used lubricating oil, particularly crankcase oils from diesel and internal combustion engines are produced each year. These waste oils are contaminated with oxidation and degradation products, water, fine particulates, metal and carbon and oil additive products. These contamination components render the oils unsuitable for continued use. Waste oils have generally been disposed of by incineration, in landfill, or used in road oiling for dust control, because the cost of reclamation and rerefining has been excessive. However, because of the rising cost of hydrocarbon fuels and lubricants, coupled with the ever-increasing demand and depletion of resources, the need for an efficient, low-cost waste oil rerefining process has arisen. In recent years some small scale rerefining processes have been put into operation in which marketable oils are recovered. However, due to the high costs involved and the resulting narrow margin of profit, such recovery processes represent a small percentage utilization of the total quantity of used lubricating oils. The ever-increasing scarcity and consequent high costs of petroleum, particularly high quality lubricating stocks, now presents positive incentives to selectively remove undesirable contaminants from used motor oils and reuse the valuable high quality lubricating components contained in such oils. Several waste oil rerefining processes are known from the prior art. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,639,229, a process is described where a mixture of an aliphatic monohydric alcohol of from four to five carbon atoms and a light hydrocarbon is added to waste oil. The mixture settles into three distinct layers. The upper oily layer is recovered, treated with sulfuric acid and thereafter refined by conventional means. In U.S. Pat. No. 3,919,076, a process is described that involves removing water from the waste oil, adding a saturated hydrocarbon solvent, settling the mixture to recover the oil/solvent mix, removing the solvent, vacuum distilling the residual oil to collect selected fractions, hydrogenating the fractions over a catalyst, stripping hydrogenated oil to remove light ends and filtering the remaining product. U.S. Pat. No. 4,124,492 discloses a process for reclaiming useful hydrocarbon oil from contaminated waste oil in which the waste oil is dehydrated and, thereafter, the dehydrated oil is dissolved in selected amounts of isopropanol. The undissolved waste matter is separated and the residual oil/solvent fraction is distilled to recover the decontaminated oil and solvent. The recovered oil is further clarified by treatment with a bleaching clay or activated carbon at elevated temperatures. In U.S. Pat. No. 4,021,333, a process is described for rerefining used oil that includes distilling a volatile forecut from the oil, followed by a conventional type of distillation that may occur at reduced pressure. Use of demister means is preferred to minimize carry-over of material into the distillate. The distillation is continued until the desired recovery is obtained. The impurities present in the

distillate are extracted. DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION In accordance with the present invention, a process is provided for rerefining used oil containing lubricating oil. The method in accordance with the present invention reduces the tendency of the used oil to coke, crack, and foul the equipment. Further, a specific type of recycle that forms part of the process also allows greater recovery of lubricating oil products through a "carrier effect" of the light ends. Thus, in one aspect, the present invention relates to the increased yield of recovered lubricating oil without subjecting the waste oil feedstock to temperatures that create conditions of coking, cracking, or fouling. In another aspect, this invention relates to a process for varying the recycle flow of light ends to achieve the desired viscosity of lubricating oil. Still another aspect of this invention relates to reducing the temperature while achieving the desired recovery of lubricating oil from the waste oil feedstock. In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the waste oil feedstock undergoes an initial distillation in which a volatile forecut is removed from the used oil to provide a resulting oil containing lubricating oil. This distillation may also remove water, gasoline and the like, or these components may be removed prior to this distillation. Thereafter, the resulting oil is distilled to form heavy and light fractions, with a portion of the light fraction being recycled and mixed into the resulting oil prior to distillation of the resulting oil in a quantity effective for lowering the vaporization temperature to reduce the tendency of coking, cracking, and fouling during distillation and to increase the recovery of lube oil. In accordance with another aspect, the present invention further includes distilling the heavy fraction obtained from the distillation of the resulting oil to form a heavy lube fraction and a residual fraction. Further, the distillation of the heavy fraction can also include a recycle of the heavy lube oil fraction into the heavy fraction prior to distillation of the heavy ends for lowering the vaporization temperature to reduce the tendency of coking, cracking and fouling during distillation and to increase the recovery of lube oil. Generally, the amount of distillate recycled to the resulting fraction or heavy fraction prior to distillation is between about 5% and 300% by weight of the fraction to be distilled. In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a process is provided in which used oil containing a lubricating oil is rerefined by distilling the used oil to remove a volatile forecut to provide a resulting oil containing lubricating oil. Thereafter, the resulting oil is distilled in an agitated thin film evaporator or a wiped-film evaporator or any other suitable heat transfer device to form heavy and light fractions with lubricating oil being contained in the light

fraction. The heavy fraction obtained from the distillation of the resulting oil is further distilled to form a heavy lube fraction and a residual fraction in which an agitated thin film evaporator or a wiped-film evaporator or any other suitable heat transfer device may be used. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS The invention can be more completely and easily understood by reference to the accompanying drawings in which: FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a preferred process flowsheet and apparatus used in conjunction with the present invention; FIG. 2 is a graph depicting the effect of the recirculation ratio on the amount of used oil distilled as a function of atmospheric temperature for distillation of a typical waste oil in accordance with the invention, having water and a volatile forecut removed therefrom; and FIG. 3 is a graph depicting the effect of the recirculating ratio on the amount of used oil distilled as a function of atmospheric temperature for distillation of the heavy fraction obtained in accordance with the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION In accordance with the present invention, an improved process is provided for rerefining used lubricating oil. Thus, in general, the method of this invention is applicable to any used oil that contains lubricating oil. Most often, the used oil that is most readily obtainable is used crankcase oils from motor vehicles, used lubricating oils from machinery, used lubricating oils from equipment, transmission fluids, and other fluids in which the major constituent is an oil of lubricating viscosity. As used in this specification, the oils referred to will be petroleum-based oils (i.e., mineral oils), but it is to be understood that synthetic oils may be substituted therefor. Broadly stated, the method of this invention includes the following steps for treating used lubricating oil feedstocks which are often collected as drainings from the crankcases of diesel, gasoline, and other types of internal combustion engines. The used oil feedstock is distilled to remove any water, gasoline, and other similarly volatile components therefrom. This first stage generally operates at or near atmospheric pressure, although this is not critical. When the first stage is operated at atmospheric pressure, the feedstock is generally heated in the range between about 220.degree. F. and about 400.degree. F. The optimum temperature for the first stage is dependent on the feedstock contaminants of water and volatile fuels and the residence time allowed for removing these components from the feedstock. In the second stage, the residue from the first stage is then heated so as to achieve a

temperature in the range between about 250.degree. F. and 500.degree. F. The residue from the first stage is then distilled in the second stage to remove a fuel oil cut (components that are heavier and somewhat less volatile than those removed in the first stage). This distillation section preferably operates at a reduced pressure, generally in the range of about 20 to about 150 millimeters mercury absolute. This preferred reduced pressure range and temperature is selected so as to remove all desired components, such as fuel oil, and will generally require a pressure of about 150 millimeters of mercury absolute with a residual lube oil exit temperature generally of between 460.degree. F. and 500.degree. F. Preferably, the volatile forecut has a flash point of less than about 116.degree. C. The first two stages, as previously described, can be accomplished in a single stage at this reduced pressure for removal of all components of water, gasoline, and other volatile fuels together with somewhat less volatile components, such as fuel oil. This would then necessitate further separation of the various fuels and water removed. Preferably, the used oil is distilled to remove therefrom a forecut having a viscosity less than that of lubricating oil and a flash point less than about 116.degree. C., thereby providing a resulting residue oil containing oil of lubricating viscosity. In the third stage, the first removal of lube oil products occurs. This stage operates in a pressure range between about 2 and 5 millimeters of mercury absolute and in a temperature range between about 265.degree. F. and 500.degree. F. These ranges of pressure and temperature generally provide a recovery (without recirculation) of between about 5 and 56 percent by weight of the feedstock for typical used lubricating oils. These percentages may be expected to vary based on the distillation characteristics of the feedstock in addition to the operating conditions imposed on the third-stage distillation unit. To substantially increase the removal of lube oil and additionally reduce vaporization temperatures, recirculation of the distilled product is employed. Generally the viscosity of the oil removed in the third stage is between about 60 SSU and 200 SSU at 100.degree. F. The recirculation of vaporized products substantially increases the recovery of lube oil through the carrier effect or partial-pressure effect. Listed in Table 1 are the improvements and associated recovery percentages based on four values of recirculation (0%, 50%, 100%, and 200%) for each of four different overhead products for a typical feedstock. One major improvement provided by recirculation of the distillate is the lowering of the effective vaporization temperature of the feedstock. This allows increased recovery and lower operating temperatures while greatly reducing the tendency for coking or cracking of the feedstock to occur. In addition, any tendency for the equipment to become fouled is also reduced. In order to more completely understand the present invention, it is important to understand the distinction between reflux and recirculation of distillate. Reflux is the principle of returning a portion of condensed overhead product from a distillation tower to the top or side of the tower. The purpose of reflux is to improve fractionation. In contrast,

recirculation of distillate, as used in accordance with the present invention, is the principle of returning a portion of the condensed vapor to the feedstock whereby its "carrying" or partial pressure effect can reduce the vaporization temperature of the feedstock. TABLE 1 ______________________________________ AMOUNT OF FEEDSTOCK VAPORIZED, WEIGHT PERCENT ATMOSPHERIC VAPORIZING TEMPERATURE 580.degree. F. 700.degree.0 F. 800.degree. F. 820.degree. F. ______________________________________ Flash Vaporization (Feedstock-0) Recirculation) 5.0 17.5 48.0 56.3 50% Recirculation 10.0 27.2 60.5 68.9 100% Recirculation 17.4 32.3 66.5 77.5 200% Recirculation 22.4 36.2 70.2 79.8 ______________________________________ The values shown in Table 1 were obtained from the Distillation Curve depicted in FIG. 2. Thus, the combination of pressure, temperature, and recirculation ratios outlined in Table 1 provides, for a typical waste oil, a range of lube distillate removal from the third stage between 5 to 79.8 weight percent of the feedstock to this stage. By adjusting the specific parameters of pressure, temperature, and recirculation ratio, a specific product characteristic can be obtained under lower temperature operating conditions compared to a system with no recirculation. Additionally, if product recovery in the third stage is desired without additional stages, the upper limits of recirculation can be utilized to maximize recovery. In the fourth stage, a heavy lube oil fraction is removed as a product, which leaves behind a very heavy viscous residue (generally about 3000 to 35,000 SSU at 210.degree. F.). Operation of the fourth stage is similar to that of the third stage in that the operating pressure, temperature, and recycle rate can be varied to produce heavy lube oil products with various properties desired by various end-users. In the fourth stage, the recycling of distilled product has the same effects as previously described for the third stage. Namely, increased recovery of lube oil products, reduction of the vaporization temperature, and reduced risks of coking and cracking of the feedstock. Operating conditions for the fourth stage are generally a pressure of between about 0.5 to 3.0 millimeters of mercury absolute and a temperature of between about 315.degree. F. and 600.degree. F. The preferred operating conditions are at a pressure of about 0.5 millimeter of mercury absolute and a temperature range of 550.degree. F. and 650.degree. F. However, as previously stated with respect to the third stage, these conditions can be varied to alter the properties of the product or to change the fraction of the feed which is vaporized and recovered as product. Further, these parameters may change depending on the type of feedstock. Generally, the viscosity of the lube oil obtained in the fourth stage is between about 200 SSU and 1200 SSU at 100.degree. F.

The recirculation of the vaporized product increases the recovery of heavy lube oil through the carrier effect or partial-pressure effect. Listed in Table 2 are improvements and associated recovery percentages based on four values of recirculation (0%, 50%, 100% and 200%) for each of four different overhead products for a typical feedstock. One major improvement attained by the recirculation is the lowering of the effective vaporization temperature of the feedstock. This allows increased recovery of heavy lube distilled in the fourth stage while reducing the risk of coking, cracking, and fouling. TABLE 1 ______________________________________ AMOUNT OF FEEDSTOCK VAPORIZED, WEIGHT PERCENT ATMOSPHERIC VAPORIZING TEMPERATURE 800.degree. F. 850.degree.0 F. 900.degree. F. 940.degree. F. ______________________________________ Flash Vaporization (No Recirculation) 16.4 40.5 62.2 77.5 50% Recirculation 20.7 47.2 66.9 78.0 100% Recirculation 22.7 51.0 71.5 81.0 200% Recirculation 24.0 52.7 73.9 82.7 ______________________________________ The values set forth in Table 2 were obtained from the Distillation Curve set forth in FIG. 3. A variable recirculation rate capability together with changes in pressure and temperature allow for achieving maximum recovery of heavy lube oil in stage 4 of the process. In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the distillation in stages 3 and 4 is performed in an agitated thin film evaporator or a wiped-film evaporator or any other suitable heat transfer device. The process can be more completely understood by reference to FIG. 1, which is a schematic depiction of the preferred embodiment of the process. Waste oil feedstock is pumped through a line 10 and heated by a heat exchanger 12 to a temperature in the range of between about 100.degree. F. and 200.degree. F. Thereafter, the feedstock exits heat exchanger 12 and enters a line 14. Upon exiting line 14, the feedstock enters a first-stage evaporator 16 that generally operates at a near atmospheric pressure. First-stage evaporator 16 heats the feedstock to a temperature in the range of between about 220.degree. F. and 400.degree. F. so as to remove essentially all water, gasoline, and other volatile components. The water, gasoline, and other volatile components that are removed from the feedstock exit through a line 18 and are condensed and cooled with a heat exchanger 20. Thereafter, the water, gasoline, and other volatiles that have been removed from the feedstock can be separated into fuel and water by conventional separation techniques. The oil that exits the first stage is pumped through a line 22 and is heated by a heat exchanger 24 to a temperature in the range of between about 300.degree. F. and 400.degree. F. After heating in heat exchanger 24, the oil flows through a line 26 and into the second stage.

In the second stage of the process, the oil is treated in a second stage evaporator 28. Second stage evaporator 28 operates at a reduced pressure, generally in the range of between about 20 to 150 millimeters of mercury absolute. In the second stage, the oil is heated to a temperature in the range of between about 250.degree. F. and 500.degree. F. Second stage evaporator 28 removes by vaporization the heavier fuel oil components present in the waste oil reaching the second stage. The heavier fuel that is removed in this stage exits second stage evaporator 28 through line 30 and is thereafter condensed and cooled in a heat exchanger 32. The oil that has not been removed from the second stage exits second stage evaporator 28 through line 34. The oil in line 34 flows through a line 35, is heated in a heat exchanger 36 and exits heat exchanger 36 into a line 38. Thereafter, the oil enters the third stage 40 for further treatment. Heat exchanger 36 heats the oil to a temperature generally in the range of between about 350.degree. F. and 450.degree. F. A third stage evaporator 40 as previously described is utilized and operates at a reduced pressure, generally in the range of between about 2 and 5 millimeters of mercury absolute at a temperature of between about 265.degree. F. and 500.degree. F. Light lube oil is vaporized in third stage evaporator 40 and exits into a line 42. Line 42 carries the light lube oil that has been vaporized into a heat exchanger 44 where the vaporized light lube oil is condensed and cooled to a temperature that is substantially the same temperature as line 34. This resultant light lube oil product then exits heat exchanger 44 and enters a line 46. Line 46 is split into two separate lines, 48 and 50. It is this split of line 46 that forms the recirculation of the light lube oil into the input to the third stage through line 48 and then line 35, mixing with the product in line 34. Thus, it is necessary to have a suitable valve or other arrangement so that the desired split of line 46 can be attained. The light lube oil entering line 48 is the oil that is recirculated and is combined with the waste oil exiting line 34 to form line 35. The desired recirculation percentage of line 48, as compared to line 34, is a controlled flow as determined by desired operating parameters. Preferably, the flow in line 48 can be changed from about 0 to about 300 weight percent of the flow in line 34. Thus, the feed in lines 35 and 38 consists of the combination of lines 34 and 48. For example, if 100% recirculation is desired, the weight flow in line 34 equals the weight flow in line 48. The light lube oil that forms line 50 is further cooled in a heat exchanger 52. The residual product of the third stage evaporation exits third stage evaporator 40 and enters line 54 where it is mixed with a line 56 to form a line 58 that enters a heat exchanger 60. Line 56 is the recirculation line of the fourth stage evaporation. Heat exchanger 60 heats the product in line 58 to a temperature in the range of between about 400.degree. F. and 490.degree. F. The product then exits heat exchanger 60 and enters a line 62 that feeds into a fourth stage evaporator 64. Fourth stage evaporation 64 operates at a reduced pressure, generally in the range of between about 0.5 and 3 millimeters of mercury absolute and at temperatures in the range of between about 315.degree. F. and 630.degree. F. The heavy lube oil

vaporized in the fourth stage is removed from fourth stage wiped-film evaporator 64 through a line 66 and is condensed and cooled with a heat exchanger 68 to a temperature that is substantially the same temperature as the temperature of line 54. This product of heavy lube oil is then directed through a line 70 where it is split into two lines, 56 and 72. As previously discussed with respect to the third stage, the desired recirculation percentage is determined by the flow rate of line 56 and line 54. These are controlled flows as determined by desired operating conditions. The flow rate of line 56 can preferably be changed from about 0 to about 300 weight percent based on the flow of line 54. The flow not needed for recirculation is then subcooled in a heat exchanger 74 and may be transferred via a line 76 to storage to await further treatment or for use. The residual product of the fourth stage exits fourth stage evaporator 64 into a line 78 where it is transferred to storage. Steps of final polishing for color and removal of impurities that may remain in the heavy and light oils may be required to achieve a lubricating oil for use in industry with characteristics near, equal, or better than virgin lubricating oil. While the invention has been described with respect to preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that various modifications thereof will now be apparent to one skilled in the art, and such modifications as fall within the scope of the appended claims are intended to be covered thereby. *****

Salt bath refining

United States Patent 7241377

Ads by Google

Raised Drill Platform

Drill Platform That Eliminates Any Seasonal Constraints. Call Us Now!
www.matsystems.ca Abstract: A process for heating thermally unstable or difficult to heat liquid feeds, e.g., used lubricating oil (ULO) to dehydrate and/or recover distillable components therefrom, is disclosed. The liquid feed is heated by direct contact heat exchange with molten salt, preferably maintained as a bath, operating at a temperature above the boiling point of water and below 600 C. The liquid feed is heated and typically at least partially vaporized in, or above, or by contact with the molten salt to produce a heated liquid. When ULO contaminated with water is the feed, the vapor product of the process will comprise water vapor and/or distillable hydrocarbons. ULO additive decomposition products, such as carbon, may be removed as a solid, semi-solid or liquid residual phase from contact with the molten salt.
Ads by Google

Heat Transfer Oils

Safe Easy Disposal, Fluid Analysis Low Maintenance, Great Tech Support
www.paratherm.com

Water Vacs and Frac Tanks

Highest Quality, Lowest Priced Tank Custom Design, Available Today
www.monstertanksinc.com

Functional fluids
Ionic liquid-based additives for polymers, lubricants, surfactants
www.iolitec.de/en

T. Boone Natural Gas

The Marcellus Formation is 3x the equivalent of Saudi's oil. New rpt.
WealthWire.com/T.Boone_Pickens

Inventors:

Malone, Donald P. (Grayson, KY, US) Application Number: 10/918956 Publication Date: 07/10/2007 Filing Date: 08/16/2004 Export Citation: Click for automatic bibliography generation Assignee: DTX Technologies, LLC (Lexington, KY, US) Primary Class: 208/179 Other Classes: 208/177, 208/347 International Classes: C10M175/00; C10G7/00; C10M175/00; C10G7/00 Field of Search: 208/179, 208/347, 208/177 View Patent Images: Download PDF 7241377 US Patent References: RE383 Oil re-refining method and apparatus 66 64476 CONTINUOUS PLURAL STAGE HEATED VAPOR 72 INJECTION PROCESS FOR RECOVERING LUBE OIL BASE STOCKS FROM USED MOTOR OIL Decembe Kenton r, 2003 Septembe Moore et r, 2002 al. PDF help

FORMULATIONS, AND ASPHALT BLEND COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING USED MOTOR OIL BOTTOMS FROM SAID PROCESS 63721 Method of removing contaminants from petroleum April, 22 distillates 2002 61102 Molten metal hydrocarbon gasification process 39 Process for recovering lube oil base stocks from used motor oil formulations, asphalt blend 60687 compositions containing used motor oil bottoms 59 from said process, and asphalt pavement compositions containing said asphalt blend compositions 56198 Drying of fiber webs 06 55565 Process for contaminated oil reclamation 48 53022 Integrated process for the production of high 82 quality lube oil blending stock 52863 Apparatus for contaminated oil reclamation 80 52445 Integrated process for the production of distillate 65 hydrocarbon 44216 Hydrocarbon treatment process 31 40124 Thermal cracking method for the production of 57 ethylene and propylene in a molten metal bath 32102 Process and apparatus for carrying out chemical 68 reactions with the aid of molten heating media 31738 Crankcase oil refining 59 22763 Catalytic converter 07 August, 2000 Gorman Malone et al.

May, 2000

Moore et al.

April, 1997

Warren

Septembe Mellen r, 1996 April, 1994 Kalnes et al.

February, Mellen 1994 Septembe Lankton r, 1993 et al. Decembe Ampaya 208/4 r, 1983 et al. 04 March, 1977 Bredeso n et al.

October, Hendal 585/6 1965 et al. 34 March, 1965 March, 1942 Chambe 208/1 rs 84 Houdry

16724 Process and apparatus for the distillation and 59 cracking of hydro carbon oils 16358 Distillation of tar 96

June, 1928 July, 1927

Jansen

208/7 2

Morgan 208/4 et al. 2

15733 Method and apparatus for continuous distillation of February, 208/3 Blumner 70 tars and oils 1926 60 15278 Heating liquids by introduction into molten metal 47
Ads by Google

February, Duckha 196/1 1925 m et al. 18

Thermal Oil Boilers ? TT BOILERS Manufacture High Quality Industrial Boilers. See more here !
abco-ttboilers.com/Thermal_Oil

OLAER Oil Coolers Air/oil coolers, heatexchangers circulation and screw pumps
www.olaer.nl

Glycol Dehydration Units Dehydration Regeneration Units Glycol Contactors Reboilers

www.engtechinc.com

Foreign References: EP007078 January, 9 1983 GB13574 May, 95 1974 JP591249 July, 91 1984 Other References: English translation of JP 59-124991, Jul. 19, 1984. Primary Examiner: Caldarola, Glenn Assistant Examiner: Douglas, John Attorney, Agent or Firm: REFINING AND REFORMING OF OIL Method of destroying compounds based on organic materials containing sulphur and/or halogens and/or toxic metals, and applications of said method.

Stone, Richard D. Parent Case Data:

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit, and is a copy, of my prior provisional application No. 60/500,119, filed Sep. 4, 2003 and incorporated by reference.
Claims: I claim: 1. A method of refining used lubricating oil (ULO) containing lubricant boiling range hydrocarbons and thermally decomposable additives to recover as a hydrocarbon liquid product at least a portion of said lubricant boiling range hydrocarbons comprising: a. heating said ULO by direct contact heat exchange with molten salt having a temperature of 100 to 600 C. for a time sufficient to vaporize at least a portion of said lubricant boiling range hydrocarbons; b. removing as a vapor product said lubricant boiling range hydrocarbons; and c. recovering from contact with said molten salt a liquid residue product comprising said thermally decomposable additives or decomposition products thereof as a heavy liquid product. 2. The process of claim 1 wherein said ULO contains distillable, lubricant boiling range hydrocarbons and non-distillable or thermally decomposable additives and said ULO is heated by direct contact heat exchange to a temperature of 100 to 400 C. and sufficient to vaporize at least a majority of said lubricant boiling range hydrocarbons and recovering said vaporized lubricant boiling range hydrocarbons as a product of the process. 3. The process of claim 2 wherein said temperature and residence time are sufficient to decompose at least a majority of said decomposable additives and vaporize at least a majority of said lubricant boiling range hydrocarbons. 4. The process of claim 1 wherein at least a majority of said ULO is recovered as a vapor fraction which is essentially free of motor oil additives and at least a majority of said additives, or decomposition products thereof, are recovered as a separate liquid phase from said molten salt. 5. The method of claim 1 wherein said molten salt is maintained as a continuous phase. 6. The method of claim 5 wherein said molten salt is disposed as one or more baths

of molten salt and said ULO is injected into, or bubbles up through, said molten salt.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein said ULO is maintained as a continuous phase and said molten salt is poured, sprayed or otherwise passed down through said continuous ULO phase. 8. The method of claim 1 wherein 75 to 80 LV % of the feed is vaporized. 9. The process of claim 1 wherein direct contact heat exchange occurs under vacuum. 10. A process for refining a used lubricating oil (ULO) liquid feed comprising water, lubricant boiling range hydrocarbons and non-distillable or thermally decomposable additives comprising: a. dehydrating said ULO in a dehydration stage by heating at a temperature and pressure sufficient to vaporize said water from said ULO and produce dehydrated ULO; b. heating said dehydrated ULO by direct contact heat exchange with molten salt at a temperature and pressure sufficient to vaporize at least a majority of said lubricant boiling range hydrocarbons in said dehydrated ULO aid produce a vaporized lubricant boiling range hydrocarbon fraction and a residue liquid phase containing at least a majority of said non-distillable or thermally decomposable additives or decomposition products thereof; c. cooling and condensing said vaporized lubricant boiling range hydrocarbons to produce a liquid product stream containing at least a majority of the lubricant boiling range hydrocarbons present in said ULO feed; and d. removing said residue liquid from contact with said molten salt as a product of the process. 11. The process of claim 10 wherein said molten salt is maintained as a continuous phase. 12. The process of claim 10 wherein said molten salt has a temperature of 100 to 600 C. 13. The process of claim 10 wherein direct contact heat exchange occurs at a pressure of 0.01 to 1.5 psia. 14. A process for distilling a used lubricating oil (ULO) liquid feed comprising lubricant boiling range hydrocarbons and a non-distillable residue fraction to produce two liquid product streams comprising: a. beating said ULO liquid feed by injecting said feed into a molten salt bath operating at a temperature of 580 to 800 F. and pressure of 0.01 to 1.5 psia, wherein said temperature and pressure are sufficient to vaporize at least a majority of said lubricant boiling range hydrocarbons present in said liquid ULO feed but vaporizing no more than 85 LV % of said ULO

liquid feed and produce a vapor fraction comprising at least a majority of the lubricant boiling range hydrocarbons within said ULO liquid feed and a liquid phase residue comprising said non-distillable residue fraction; b. removing from contact with said molten salt bath said vapor fraction as an overhead vapor stream; c. cooling and condensing said overhead vapor steam to produce a first liquid phase product comprising at least a majority of said lubricant boiling range hydrocarbons in said ULO feed; and d. removing from contact with said molten salt bath said liquid phase residue as a second liquid phase product. 15. A process for heating and partially vaporizing a thermally unstable liquid feedstock which cokes and/or rapidly fouls metal surfaces such as tubes in a fired heater, heat exchanger tubes, or the like, comprising: a. injecting liquid droplets of said thermally unstable feed into a non-pyrolyzing molten salt bath operating at a temperature of 100 to 500 C. and a pressure; b. heating said injected droplets by direct contact heat exchange with said molten salt bath to a temperature, at the pressure in said bath, sufficient to vaporize at least a portion of said feed in each droplets and form bubbles rising up through said molten salt bath, each bubble having a vapor phase top and a residual liquid feed bottom in a molten salt shell; c. heating said liquid in said bubble by direct contact heat exchange with said molten salt and heating said liquid by radiant heat transfer with said molten salt bath, to produce rising heated bubbles comprising heated liquid feedstock and vapor produced by heating said liquid feedstock to produce rising bubbles comprising a heated liquid phase and a vapor phase; d. removing from above said molten salt bath said vapor phase as an overhead vapor product; and e. removing from above said molten salt bath said heated liquid phase as a liquid phase product.

Description:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to direct contact heating of normally liquid hydrocarbons and the like, especially those which are thermally unstable or difficult to heat, e.g., processing used motor oil to recover distillable and non-distillable hydrocarbons.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Automotive and many industrial lubricating oils are usually formulated from paraffin based petroleum distillate oils or from synthetic base lubricating oils. Lubricating oils are combined with additives such as soaps, extreme pressure (E.P.) agents, viscosity index (V.I.) improvers,

antifoamants, rust inhibitors, antiwear agents, antioxidants, and polymeric dispersants to produce an engine lubricating oil of SAE 5 to SAE 60 viscosity. After use, this oil is collected from truck and bus fleets, automobile service facilities, municipal motor oil recycling centers and retail stores. There is also a significant volume of oil collected from the industrial sector, e.g., cutting, stamping and coolant oils, which is collected on a direct basis or is collected from oily-water dehydrating facilities. This collected oil contains organometallic additives such as zinc dialkylthiophosphate from the original lubricating oil formulation, sludge formed in the engine, and water. The used oil may also contain contaminants such as waste grease, brake fluid, transmission oil, transformer oil, railroad lubricant, crude oil, antifreeze, dry cleaning fluid, degreasing solvents such as trichloroethylene, edible fats and oils, mineral acids, soot, earth and waste of unknown origin. Reclaiming of waste oil is largely carried out by small processors using various processes tailored to the available waste oil, product demands, and local environmental considerations. Such processes at a minimum include partial de-watering and coarse filtering. Some more sophisticated processors may practice chemical demetallizing or distillation. The presence of organo-metallics in waste oils such as zinc dialkylthiophosphate results in decomposition of the zinc dialkyldithiophospnate to form a carbonaceous layer rich in zinc and often other metals such as calcium, magnesium and other metals present as additives and thus difficult if not impossible to process. The carbonaceous layer containing the various metals forms rapidly on heated surfaces and can develop to a thickness of more than 1 mm in 24 hours. This layer not only reduces the heat transfer coefficient of tubular heaters rapidly, it also results in substantial or total occlusion of these tubes within a few days. Successful reclaiming processes require the reduction of the organo-metallics (or ash) content to a level at which the hot oil does not foul heated surfaces. Such reduction can be carried out by chemical processes which include reacting cation phosphate or cation sulfate with the chemically bonded metal to form metallic phosphate or metallic sulfate. U.S. Pat. No. 4,432,865 to Norman, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference, discloses contacting used motor oil with polyfunctional mineral acid and polyhydroxy compound to react with undesired contaminants to form easily removable reaction products. These chemical processes suffer from attendant disposal problems depending on the metal by-products formed. Ash content can also be reduced by heating the used lubricating oil to decompose the organometallic additives. However, indirect heat exchange surfaces cannot be maintained above 400 F. (204 C.) for extended periods without extensive fouling and deposition of metals from the additives. Used lubricating oils can be heated to an additive decomposition temperature of 400 F. (204 C.) to 1000 F. (538 C.) by direct heat exchange by mixing with a heated product oil as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,447,628 to Harrison, et al., the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. However, dilution of the product oil with used oil requires reprocessing already processed product oil . . .

UOP's Hy-Lube process, described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,244,565 and 5,302,282, and many more, uses a hot circulating hydrogen stream as a heating medium to avoid deposition of decomposed organo-metallic compounds on heating surfaces. The problem of fouling of heated surfaces can be ameliorated to some extent by gentler heating. Some processes, such as the fixed bed version of catalytic cracking, the Houdry process, used a molten salt bath to provide controlled, somewhat gentle heating of vaporized liquid hydrocarbon passing through tubes of catalyst immersed in the salt bath. Molten metal baths have also been used as a convenient way to heat difficult to processes substances to a control temperature, e.g., flammability of some plastics is tested by putting a flask with plastic into a bath of molten metal. Use of molten salt bath, or molten metal bath, or condensing high temperature vapor, could be used to reduce uneven heating of heat exchange surface and thereby reduce dT across a metal surface and perhaps slow the fouling of metal surfaces in ULO service, but the additives in the ULO would still tend to decompose on the hottest surface, which would be the heat exchanger tubes. Although not related to ULO heating, in addition to the use of molten metal or molten salt for indirect heating as discussed above, there has been use, either commercial, or reported in the patent literature, of use of molten metal for direct contact heating of various substances. The float process for making glass is almost 50 years old. Molten metal, primarily lead, for heating coal or shale has been practiced in one form or another for almost 100 years. There are recent reports and patents on use of molten metal baths for waste pyrolysis, and conversion of latex, by heating ground up plants in a metal bath to make an oily overhead product. Also somewhat related, but even more different than anything discussed above, is the HyMelt process, using molten iron beds for dissolution of various feed stocks. Temperatures in the HyMelt process are so high that if a liquid hydrocarbon feed is fed to a HyMelt reactor, the feed almost instantaneously dissociates in hydrogen and carbon, with the carbon dissolving in the molten iron. This is an excellent process for dissociating a hydrocarbon into its elemental constituents, but may be overkill for, e.g., reprocessing ULO, when all that is needed is enough heating to vaporize the lube boiling range components. Extensive work has also been done on use of molten salt baths to oxidize unwanted and difficult to process streams. Usually the salt baths are heat sources and reagents, i.e., intended to react with the feed, as reported in U.S. Pat. No. 3,845,910 or 4,602,574, which are incorporated by reference. Some researchers took the position that fouling of metal surfaces during ULO processing was going to happen, and that the best way to deal with it was to inject something into the ULO which would scrub the metal clean, i.e., injecting an abrasive material. Solvent extraction with light paraffin solvents such as propane, butane, pentane and mixtures thereof have been practiced by Interline and others. Details of the Interline Process are provided in U.S. Pat. No. 5,286,380 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,556,548. While the extraction approach seems like an elegant solution to the problem of processing ULO, the process may be relatively expensive to operate. Their quarterly report of May 15, 2002, reports that It has become evident

that demanding royalties based on production is impractical in many situations and countries. Unless and until the re-refined oil produced in a plant can be sold at prices comparable to base lubricating oils, collecting royalties based on production will be difficult. This reality was experienced in Korea, where the royalty was terminated for the first plant, and in England where the royalties were reduced and deferred until the plant becomes profitable. A breakthrough in ULO processing occurred with direct contact heating of the ULO with steam or a non-hydrogenating gas. This approach solved the problem of zinc additive decomposition fouling of hot metal surfaces, by ensuring that the metal surfaces holding the ULO were always relatively cool. The hottest spot in these ULO process was the point of vapor injection. Decomposing additives had only themselves to condense upon. Such a vapor injection ULO process was disclosed in my earlier patent, U.S. Pat. No. 6,068,759, Process for Recovering Lube Oil Base Stocks from Used Motor Oil . . . and in U.S. Pat. No. 6,447,672, Continuous Plural State Heated Vapor Injection Process for Recovering Lube Oil Base Stocks from Used Motor Oil . . . Other variations on the theme of ULO vapor injection processes are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,402,937 Pumped Recycle Vapor and U.S. Pat. No. 6,402,938, Vaporization of Used Motor Oil with Non-hydrogenating Recycle Vapor, which are incorporated by reference. The state of the art of used motor oil processing could be summarized as follows: Chemical additive and extraction approaches can be used to react with, or extract everything but, zinc additives, but costs associated with such processes are apparently high, as evidenced by little commercial use. Additives could be extracted, but the operating costs are high. Indirect heating, in a fired heater, causes rapid fouling of metal surfaces. Using milder heating, via a double boiler approach or molten metal heating medium, can minimize but not eliminate fouling on hot metal surfaces. Direct contact heating with high pressure hydrogen may eliminate fouling but requires high capital and operating expenses. Direct contact heating, with recycled product oil, helps but requires processing the ULO twice. Oxidation, either by burning as a low grade fuel, or perhaps as part of a salt bath oxidation process for waste streams. Direct contact heating with steam or non-hydrogenating vapor, as reported in my U.S. Pat. No. 6,068,759 and the related patents discussed above, is believed to be the best available technology. This approach requires only moderate capital investment and moderate operating expense when steam is the injected vapor, but the process can create a water disposal problem and is thermally less efficient because the latent heat of water is lost when the steam is condensed against cooling water or air in a heat exchanger. When other vapors are injected for heating e.g., propane, the water problem goes away but large volumes of vapor are needed to provide sufficient heat input, so costs increase to heat and recycle such vapor streams.

Although my earlier work, steam injection for direct contact heat exchange, solved the worst problem, fouling on hot metal surfaces, it had some deficiencies as briefly noted above. I wanted an even better approach. I thought about steam injection. The steam injection process seemed nice and simple, because it was easy to heat water to make steam. Unfortunately, using large amounts of water created a potential water disposal problem and produced a relatively wet plant, with many potential areas for corrosion as the steam condensed. Re-using the condensed water was possible, but there are concerns about the amount of water treatment required to remove chlorides, etc, so that corrosion and/or plugging of the tubes in the fired heater would not be a problem. Large volumes of steam were required, which resulted in relatively large plant volumes, at least until some or all of the injected steam was condensed. I realized that although the use of steam was a great advance in the art, it might not be the best approach. The pumped vapor approach, use of propane or other recycle hydrocarbon vapor eliminates many concerns about water, but required a more complicated plant to recycle the hydrocarbon vapor. Large molar volumes of injected vapor are needed because of the relatively low heat capacity of hydrocarbon vapors. Condensation and separation of multiple hydrocarbon species, both injected heating vapors and recovered lubricating components, is more complicated than cooling everything and allowing water and oil to separate as separate phases. I wanted to retain the beneficial features of heating the ULO by injecting something hot into it, but avoid the problems created by using either steam or a light hydrocarbon vapor as the heating medium. I found a way to overcome these deficiencies, by using a non-pyrolizing molten salt bath as the heating fluid. There are many salts available which are fluid at relatively low temperatures which have ideal properties for use herein. They are relatively non-corrosive, especially when used in a reducing atmosphere. They are inexpensive and easy to contain. Molten salt is sufficiently dense to hold a lot of heat, permitting reasonably efficient heating of waste streams. They are not volatile, so they do not contribute to air or water pollution. They are immiscible with ULO so the decomposition products and trash found in the ULO can be easily removed from the molten salt bath. Molten salt also permits a flexible design approach, permitting injection of the molten salt into the oil or vice versa, though not necessarily with equivalent results. When oil is injected into a molten salt bath, it is easy to increase or decrease process severity by changing the depth of molten salt in the bath or the temperature of the salt or the pressure in the molten salt bath.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, the present invention provides a process for heating a liquid feed stream comprising a normally liquid hydrocarbon comprising direct contact heating of said liquid feed by contact with molten salt to produce heated liquid.

In another embodiment, the present invention provides a method of refining used lubricating oil (ULO) containing lubricant boiling range hydrocarbons and thermally decomposable additives to recover as a hydrocarbon liquid product at least a portion of said lubricant boiling range hydrocarbons comprising heating said ULO by direct contact heat exchange with molten salt having a temperature of 100 to 500 C for a time sufficient to vaporize at least a portion of said lubricant boiling range hydrocarbons and removing as a vapor product said lubricant boiling range hydrocarbons. In yet another embodiment, the present invention provides, in a process for heating a thermally unstable liquid feedstock which cokes and/or rapidly fouls salt surfaces such as tubes in a fired heater, heat exchanger tubes, or the like, the improvement comprising heating said thermally unstable liquid feedstock by direct contact heat exchange with molten salt to produce a heated feed as a product of the process. The invention will be more fully understood from the following description of the preferred embodiment taken in conjunction with the figures.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a simplified schematic drawing of a preferred embodiment wherein used oil is refined by direct contact heating with a continuous phase of molten salt. FIG. 2 is similar to FIG. 1, but differs in that ULO, rather than molten salt, is the continuous phase. FIG. 3 shows an embodiment with a dehydration station upstream of the molten salt heating zone.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In FIG. 1, as-received Used Lube Oil (ULO) flows from a feed storage system, 10 , through line 12 to the feed pump, 13 , into the contactor vessel, 14 , at or near its bottom. A heat transfer fluid, 15 , that is immiscible with and much denser than ULO circulates from the bottom of the contactor vessel, 14 , by line 16 to a heater, 18 , that raises the temperature of the heat transfer fluid to the desired value. Heating may also be accomplished by operating electrical resistance elements in the heat transfer fluid phase in the contactor vessel, 14 . The heat transfer fluid flows back to the contactor vessel by line 20 . Flow of the heat transfer fluid through the heater, 15 , may be by natural convection, as shown, or the fluid may be caused to flow through the heater, 18 , by use of an appropriate pump. The total liquid level in the contactor, 14 , is maintained by a vertical outlet pipe, 22 , through which all gas, vapor and liquid leave the vessel and flow through line 22 , to the separator vessel, 26 . The inventory of heat transfer fluid sets its level in the contactor, 14 . When the level of the heat transfer fluid, 15 , is relatively high as shown in FIG. 1, ULO is the predominately dispersed phase and the heat transfer fluid is the

predominately continuous phase. When the level of the heat transfer fluid is relatively low as shown in FIG. 2, ULO is the predominately continuous phase and the heat transfer fluid is the predominately dispersed phase. The liquid and vapor entering the residue separator vessel, 26 , separate into a liquid stream, 28 , and a vapor stream 32 . The liquid stream, 28 , flows to a residue storage system 30 . The vapor stream, 32 , flows through a cooler, 34 , that may use air as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 as the cooling fluid or some other cooling media such as boiling water, cooling water or some other fluid. The outlet temperature of the cooler 34 should be low enough to condense substantially all of the oil in the feed, 10 . Usually an outlet temperature of less than 150 F. (65.5 C.), causes nearly all of the feed to condense. The condensed stream flows by line 36 to an overhead separator vessel, 38 , where any water in the feed, 10 , separates and flows out through line 40 to a water storage system, 42 . Liquid oil in stream 36 flows out through line 44 to an overhead oil storage system, 46 . Any non-condensable gases flow out through line 48 to a gas handling system, 50 . For extremely low flows of non-condensable gas and slightly above atmospheric pressure for the operating pressure of the overhead separator vessel 38 , the gas handling system may be simply a vent. For larger flows, a flare, or some other appropriate gas treatment system may be required. The gas handling system may also incorporate a vacuum system to cause the contactor, 14 , the residue separator, 26 , and the overhead separator 38 to operate at subatmospheric pressure. FIG. 3 shows a more preferred embodiment of the subject invention. Feed ULO, 10 flows by line 12 to a charge pump, 13 to a partial condenser, 50 , that heats it by partially condensing vapor from the overhead separator vessel, 42 , to a temperature of approximately 350 F. (176.7 C.). The heated feed flows through line 14 to a pressure-reducing valve, 16 , and then to a flash vessel 18 . All water and approximately 1% of the hydrocarbons contained in the feed, 10 , vaporize and flow by line 22 to a thermal oxidizer, 24 , or some other appropriate treatment system where the hydrocarbons are converted to carbon dioxide and water and vented through line 26 . The dried feed flows by line 20 to the feed pump, 28 , where it enters the bottom of the contactor vessel, 30 , where it is contacted with a heat transfer fluid phase, 31 . The heat transfer phase may be the continuous or dispersed phase as described earlier. The vertical outlet pipe, 32 , maintains the total liquid level in the contactor vessel, 14 . All gas, vapor, and liquid exit the contactor through line 34 to the residue separator vessel, 42 . Liquid residue flows through line 44 to a residue storage system 46 . Vapor flows through line 48 to the partial condenser, 50 , where it is partially condensed by heating the feed as described earlier. The partially condensed vapor flows through line 51 to a cooler, 52 where its temperature is reduced to at least 150 F. (65.5 C.) by heat exchange with a cooling fluid. The condensed stream flows through line 53 to the overhead separator, 54 . Liquid overhead flows out by line 56 to an overhead storage system, 58 . Any non-condensable gases flow by line 60 to a gas handling system. The gas handling system may include a vacuum system so that the contactor, 30 , the residue separator, 42 and the overhead separator, 54 can operate at sub-atmospheric pressure.

DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Any salt can be used as part or all of the molten salt bath, so long as it is in a liquid phase at the desired operating temperature. Salts heretofore used for indirect heating, i.e., salts for constant temperature molten salt baths, may be used herein. Not all salts will give equal results and some present significant safety concerns, e.g., salts of lead or antimony are toxic, but they can be included as part of the molten salt bath, if desired. Any feed containing a normally liquid hydrocarbon can be heated using the process of the present invention. The normally liquid hydrocarbons include C5 and heavier hydrocarbons, e.g., naphtha boiling range up through residual fractions. Heavy feeds are contemplated for use herein, including those which are so heavy that they are not liquid at room temperature, e.g., a grease, wax, petrolatum or indeed any hydrocarbon having a high melting point may be used as feed. These materials will, upon heating, form liquids and may be used as feed. Treatment of solids is outside the scope of the present invention, i.e., treatment of coal or dirt contaminated with oil is outside the scope of the present invention. What is essential for the practice of the present invention is direct contact heat exchange of a liquid by a liquid. The liquid must contain hydrocarbons and can even be a pure hydrocarbon. The liquid feed usually will be contaminated with undesired lighter or heavier components which can be removed by heating, either to vaporize a desired feed component from a residue fraction or to remove an undesired lighter contaminant from a desired residue product fraction. When processing ULO, the ULO will frequently contain both light and heavy contaminants. Light contaminants include water, naphtha and some impurities introduced during the ULO collection process. Heavy contaminants include the additive package. When processing ULO, the economic incentive is to vaporize as much of the feed as possible. This can create a problem as the residue will not flow when more than 83 to 85% of the feed is vaporized. I believe that a practical limit is 80% vaporization of the dry oil. A surprising feature of the use of molten salt to heat ULO and vaporize the lube oil boiling range components therefrom, is that it is easy to achieve deep de-oiling of the ULO. The salt temperature at the bottom of a molten salt continuous bath and the oil temperature at the top of the contactor, the oil floating on the surface of the molten salt, are very close. I have never seen more than 5 F. difference in them. There is evidence that no fouling has yet occurred. The invention contemplates the use of a range of molten salts for the high-intensity drying and/or heating process. These include low-melting point salts. When simple drying or only a modest amount of thermal processing is desired, the candidate molten fluids may have melting points typically ranging from 60.230 C. It is essential that the molten salt be immiscible with the ULO and substantially denser. It is preferred that the interfacial surface tension between the molten salt and the liquid feed be sufficiently high to avoid sticking of the molten fluid to the wet surface. The thermal conductivity of the molten fluid should also be sufficiently high to ensure that the molten fluid

remains in a liquid state, at least during the process, so that fluid does not solidify to form a solid film or freeze cone at the point of contact with the ULO. When the thermal conductivity of the fluid is sufficiently high, the fluid conducts heat from the body of the molten bath to the interface contact region between drops or streams of ULO and molten heating medium, or drops or streams of molten heating medium when the ULO is the continuous phase. The high density of molten salt relative to ULO promotes rapid transit of one fluid through the other and plenty of motive force should baffles or column packing be used. A spectrum of molten salt temperatures can be used, from high to low.

ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS
The following details are provided to show a good way to practice the present invention, but they do not represent actual experiments. For tests, I would use a length of 4 schedule 40 stainless steel pipe. The salt used would be molten and have a low vapor pressure at temperatures from 600 to 1000 F. The depth of molten salt would be about 20, with about 12 of freeboard or vapor space above the molten salt. The stainless steel pipe will be heated by a cylindrical heater, an electric jacket with a thermostat. The ULO feed will be added into the bottom of the molten salt bath via a nipple with a length of SS tubing affixed so that the tubing did not extend into the molten salt bath. The process should be run under vacuum, which is customary for lube oil recovery processes, preferably at about 0.51 psia. It may be necessary to first dehydrate the ULO, or to conduct the process in at least two stages, with the first stage dehydrating the oil. It may be necessary to add heat tape to the stainless steel tubing to prevent a freeze cone or freeze debris from forming near the point of feed injection. This will probably not be a problem in commercial sized units, but if it is some form of heating of the feed injection means can be used to overcome it. ULO re-refiners may operate at low temperatures, from 50 to 150 C, using a molten salt bath merely to remove water and/or light ends which may be present. This mild use of the technology would permit a fleet operator to periodically condition the motor oil used in vehicles, by removing water and crankcase dilution, and return the conditioned motor oil to the vehicle, perhaps with some additional additives. Some re-refiners, especially those with no market for a heavy liquid residue product, may want to use higher temperatures, say 300 to 400 C or even higher, to maximize production of distillable hydrocarbons and minimize production of ash or sludge from the ULO, to simultaneously improve product recovery and minimize disposal costs. In the process of the invention, especially when practiced with a salt bath continuous phase, ULO, when injected into the base of the bath, is almost instantly heated, causing some

vaporization and disruption of any large droplets of ULO that may try to form. The ULO vapors produced are much lighter than the residual ULO liquid, and are believed to form something like a three phase bubble, with a vapor top, liquid oil bottom in a molten salt shell. If a large bubble forms, the light vapor portion will either break away from the residual ULO liquid, or at the least cause some form of vigorous agitation as the large three phase bubble rises. If the vapor portion breaks away, that leaves the residual ULO liquid to form a new bubble, but of liquid, or at least much more liquid than before the vapor phase broke away, and this denser bubble will not rise as quickly in the molten salt bath, giving more time for the molten salt to heat the ULO. Radiant heat transfer is also believed to play a significant part, in that the lens shaped oil pool in the lower portion of a bubble has a large surface area to volume ratio, one or more orders of magnitude more favorable for heat transfer than can occur when the ULO is passed through a salt tube of 46 or similar diameter, in a fired heater. Radiation heat transfer is considered to play a negligible part of transferring heat from a hot salt heat exchange surface to oil flowing within, or around, the surface. In my process, the bubbles are small enough and can see enough hot molten salt so that a significant amount of radiant heat transfer occurs. Based on my work done to date the optimum conditions for temperature and pressure will be around 600 to 620 F. and 1 to 1.5 psia. There are actually an infinite number of temperature pressure combinations that will give the 80% overhead yield desired. For ULO, the limits on the combinations of pressure and temperature may range from 580 F. at 0.01 psia to 800 F. at near atmospheric pressure. Either of these extremes could result in an inoperable situation. The key parameter is vaporizing 75 to 80% of the feed without causing problems that make the process inoperable. The ultimate use of the products, both the overhead lube oil fraction and the residue fraction, can have an important influence on operating conditions. When the process is being practiced to recover a high quality lubricating oil base stock, or a material which can be subjected to further conventional processing to make it a base stock, relatively low temperatures and somewhat lower product recoveries may be optimum. When the residue product is going to be an asphalt extender, the desire to preserve as much as possible of the plastic present in the ULO, primarily the viscosity modifier, to improve asphalt properties. When the overhead product will be FCC feed, a much lower quality product can be tolerated, so higher temperatures and higher recovery may be optimum. To minimize production of low value waste, and this will usually be the residual fraction of the ULO, after the lubricant boiling range hydrocarbons have been removed, it may be important to have very high temperatures and/or lower pressures, to reduce the resid fraction as much as possible. Reducing Conditions It is believed to be important to maintain reducing conditions during processing. Salt baths can be reactive, especially when used in an oxidizing atmosphere, for destruction of waste streams. Oxidizing atmospheres, if present during lube oil recovery, will degrade the quality of the lubricating boiling range hydrocarbons recovered overhead, so use of a reducing atmosphere is preferred.

When a molten salt bath is used for simple dehydration of ULO, or to remove light ends, such as naphtha or other materials sometimes present as crankcase dilution it is not so critical to maintain a reducing atmosphere, as the temperatures involved are usually so low that oxidation reactions will either not occur or occur so slowly as not to be troublesome. General Considerations It is important to use a molten fluid, with a heat range within that required for the desired process objectives. When simple dehydration of ULO is all that is required, and this will usually be a first or preliminary treatment rather than the entire process, molten salt which is molten in the 80 C+ temperature range is suitable. When distillation of lubricating oil boiling range components from the ULO is desired, the salt must remain molten at temperatures above 100 C to say 600 C. When some carbonization or coking of a residue fraction is desired, even higher temperatures may be required, typically 200 C to 700 C. The upper limit on temperature/choice of the salt alloy is determined by volatility and process constraints. The preferred molten salts will have a low vapor pressure at the temperatures used, so that loss of molten salt due to dusting or for any other reason is less than 1% a day. The salts chosen should not be corrosive under process conditions and preferably are non-toxic, for safety. This invention permits drying and/or recovering lube oil base stocks and/or other hydrocarbons from used motor oil. The process and apparatus of the present invention also permits efficient processing of other waste or low value oil streams that contain so much emulsified water and/or additives that conventional processing is impractical. When used to process ULO, this invention permits the separation of additive packages from valuable distillable hydrocarbons in the waste motor oil with limited, or no, decomposition of these distillable hydrocarbons. When the residual fraction from the ULO is destined for use as an asphalt extender, it may be beneficial to have some or most or even all of the additive package intact. The plastic viscosity modifiers used in some lube oils may have beneficial effects on the asphalt, so it is good to have a process which gives re-refiners the option to decompose, or not decompose, the additive package. The process and apparatus of the present invention may also be used to heat other thermally unstable, or difficult to heat, liquids. Re-refiners may wish to operate under a hard vacuum, to maximize recovery of lube oil components and minimize decomposition of additives. Others may wish to operate above 1 atm up to 100 atm pressure, or more, to minimize vapor volumes and facilitate processing of streams with large amounts of water. Higher pressures permit a more compact facility to be built. Multiple molten salt baths may be used, much as product fractionators use multiple distillation trays, each operating at a slightly different temperature.