Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table of Contents
Executive Summary .........................................................................................1 Introduction .....................................................................................................2 Improve Costs, Quality and Efficiency with Standards and Automation .......3 Driving Competitive Advantage for CROs and Biopharmaceuticals ..............4 CROs ............................................................................................................4 Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Companies ..........................................5 Automating Data Integration and Standardization ........................................6 The Future of Standards ..................................................................................8 Closing Thoughts .............................................................................................8 About SAS ........................................................................................................9 A Closer Look .................................................................................................10
Executive Summary
The life sciences industry is under pressure to accelerate time to market for new compounds at lower cost. A key to compressing the cycle is to streamline the data management tasks that consume as much as 65 percent of the clinical trial process, by some estimates. Traditionally, the process of managing clinical trials data has been cumbersome and resource-intensive. The data needed for analysis of drug safety and efficacy resides in multiple, disparate systems. Time-consuming and expensive manual coding is required to integrate all that data into analysis-ready form. Further data manipulations are required to prepare regulatory submissions. Every clinical trial brings a new data integration and transformation project, requiring just as much programming effort as the previous ones. There is much room for improvement in the traditional modus operandi by taking advantage of industry standards and automated data integration processes. Contract research organizations (CROs) can reduce the cost of their services while simultaneously growing revenues through new service offerings such as legacy data migration projects and Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) standards consulting. By efficiently standardizing legacy clinical data, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies can unlock the scientific and business value hidden in their clinical repositories. In addition, these companies can leverage their standardized clinical data for more efficient and effective cross-study data analysis, review and utilization. With SAS Clinical Data Integration, clinical research professionals can improve efficiency, quality and speed in collecting, managing, analyzing, reporting and assessing data from clinical trials. Prebuilt models automatically transform legacy data to CDISC standards. Research analysts can readily customize the models using visual interfaces, create new ones and reuse the work of others. Embedded data quality routines ensure standard, trusted clinical data for analysis within and across clinical trials. Consistent, validated data structures enable timely, seamless flow of information among all the parties involved in a clinical trial. Industry analysts have stated that automated data integration and validation can trim 30 to 50 percent from the clinical trial cycle. Field experience with the SAS solution has shown that even greater savings are possible. This white paper makes a case for implementing data standards and applying automated processes for managing data throughout the clinical trials process, from study design to regulatory submissions.
Introduction
Does the experience of this life sciences executive match the current reality in your organization? We also had a number of disparate systems holding various pieces of information and they didnt talk to each other, and we were actually incapable of having the information at our fingertips The workflow of clinical trials depends on multiple, complex data interactions that may occur across multiple organizations. Information collected from study subjects is deposited into a clinical repository, painstakingly transformed to suit study purposes, analyzed to determine product efficacy and safety, and then used to prepare the regulatory submission. By some estimates, as much as 65 percent of the time it takes to conduct a clinical trial is spent on data interchange among collaborating entities. The process entails a series of exchanges between sponsors and investigators, between sponsors and CROs, between CROs and labs, between sponsors and regulators, and so on. The growing volume and complexity of these data interactions is seen as a primary cause for escalating costs in drug development. The ideal of converging on a set of data standards such as those from CDISC to streamline collaboration is gaining momentum but facing three key obstacles as well:
This highly manual approach is not repeatable across studies, nor does this process scale without adding expensive headcount. The company misses opportunities to reuse processes, code and information. As a result, more programmers are needed to support additional studies. And still there is the risk of data corruption from coding errors and inconsistencies.
The potential for cost savings is enough to make the most tradition-bound organization take notice. Consider a single clinical trial with an eight-month cycle time (excluding subject participation time) and an average daily study cost of $37,000 per day (an estimate developed by Tufts Center for Drug Development). The reduction in cycle time would yield $9 million in cost savings for a typical trial $15.7 million per submission for a trial on the critical path. In addition, the adoption of standards with automated clinical data integration would improve the quality of clinical research by: Decreasing startup and reporting time for clinical trials. Improving communications among project teams. Reducing the chance of human error in data management processes. Preserving knowledge from prior studies in a reusable fashion. Enabling investigators to analyze adverse events and trends across a series of trials.
CDISC standards implemented at the beginning of a clinical study can reap savings of 70-90 percent of the startup stage time and cost, for an overall study resource savings of 60 percent (outside of the subject participation time). The resulting efficiencies would allow the industry as a whole to save billions of dollars and also to concentrate on developing products that meet escalating safety, public health and regulatory requirements.
Statement from the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium
CROs
In order to remain competitive, CROs must deliver their services faster, better and cheaper than both competing CROs and the sponsors own internal departments. This is a major challenge for even the most efficient organizations. There is tremendous potential for CROs to extract significant competitive advantage from both a cost and revenue standpoint using SAS Clinical Data Integration. Major cost savings are possible for the delivery of analytic services based on efficient standardization and automation during analytical data preparation. More importantly, CROs have the opportunity to grow revenue through more competitive bids and the development of new service offerings to win legacy data migration projects and consulting projects.
Data standardization and validation automates the process of validating CDISC standards and/or an organizations internal data standards. The solution is flexible enough to map to different standards, such as different versions of SDTM or custom standards as required by a specific therapeutic area, development program or organizational entity. SAS Clinical Data Integration can evolve to support emerging and future health care data standards, with lifecycle management for standards as they evolve.
A largely hands-off, automated approach reduces workload but also makes the next project extremely straightforward. You already have a working model for many or even all of the data transformations that might be required. Simply update the data source references (one small subset of metadata) and go. Each subsequent project can build on the previous ones, each project being in turn less resource-intensive and more efficient than the previous ones. With SAS Clinical Data Integration, you can build data transformation processes to standardize legacy and other disparate data to CDISC models, customize the embedded CDISC models and create new models to match your organizations business requirements. In the process, you ensure the proper use of CDISC or custom standards, deliver cleaner data for analysis and submissions, while decreasing costs and time to submission.
Closing Thoughts
In an industry being reshaped by mega-mergers and acquisitions, regulation and globalization, commoditization and competition, every day counts. Every dollar counts. Every resource counts. Pharmaceutical companies must seize every opportunity to compress the clinical trial cycle. Automating the data aggregation, transformation and validation tasks associated with analytical data preparation for clinical trials can potentially trim significant time and costs from the clinical trials process. The SAS Clinical Data Integration solution provides value for sponsors, CROs and regulatory authorities through mature data transformation capabilities, embedded CDISC capabilities, the ability to automate repeatable processes and the flexibility to support the evolution of both new and custom models. One SAS customer, a leading CRO, significantly reduced the time required to standardize data to SDTM. What used to take a week can now be finished in a morning, in just 6 percent of the time formerly required. The organization estimates that efficiency gains will yield cost savings of between $2 million and $2.3 million in three years, plus an estimated $3 million in new revenues due to having SAS Clinical Data Integration as a competitive differentiator in the CRO market.
Time and cost savings as compelling as they are are only part of the story: Prebuilt and customizable data transformations ensure the proper use of standards, especially CDISC. Embedded data quality routines deliver cleaner, more trustworthy data. Automated processes dramatically reduce the time required to manage and report on clinical data. Common metadata makes data processes repeatable, auditable and automatic. Standardized data fosters greater communication among project teams and across projects thereby improving the quality of scientific discovery. To find out more about SAS Clinical Data Integration and other SAS solutions for life sciences organizations, contact your SAS account representative or visit www.sas.com/industry/pharma.
About SAS
SAS is the leader in business analytics software and services, and the largest independent vendor in the business intelligence market. Through innovative solutions delivered within an integrated framework, SAS helps customers at more than 45,000 sites improve performance and deliver value by making better decisions faster. Since 1976, SAS has been giving customers around the world THE POWER TO KNOW.
A Closer Look
Figure 1. Design data flow and transformations in a visual interface with specific clinical data functionality.
Figure 2. Detailed reports describe data standards usage patterns. These reports can be used to determine the impact of changes to an existing standard or version changes like migrating from SDTM 3.1.1 to SDTM 3.1.2.
10
Figure 3. Status reports about mapping and adherence to a standard are also available either by study or for all active studies.
Figure 4. Administrators can add, remove and modify industry data standards and internal data standards, as well as manage clinical studies including standards use, default content for new studies and controlled terminology packages.
11