UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
APPLICATION AND
- . ..-o
: l t"
"'"''"'-
IN CLERK'S OFFICE
.J S DISTRiCT COURT E !1 N.Y
'' JAN 0 4 2012 +
BROOKLYN OFFICE
ORDER OF EXCLUDABLE DELAY
-v-
Case No.
'' u t>o (St-1")
The United States of America and the defendant hereby jointly request that the time period from
-;sA1..1'-' 41\."{ !2.to

J)} from the computation of the time period within which
( ) an information or indictment must be filed, or (XW)
trial of the charges against defendant must commence. (XC)
The parties seek the exclusion of the foregoing period because
they are engaged in plea negotiations, which they believe are likely to result in a disposition of this
case without trial, and they require an exclusion of time in order to focus efforts on plea negotiations without the risk
that they would not, despite their diligence, have reasonable time for effective preparation for trial,
('}() they need additional time to prepare for trial due to the complexity of case,
( )
The defendant states that he/she has been fully advised by counsel of his/her rights guaranteed under the
Sixth Amendment to the Constitution; the Speedy Trial Act of 1974, 18 U.S.C. 3161-74; the plan and rules of
this Court adopted pursuant to that Act; and Rule 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The defendant
understands that he/she has a ri t to be tried before a jury within a specified time not counting periods excluded.
For U.S. Attorney, E.D.N.Y.
The joint application of the United S!tes 9f America and the defen ant having been heard at a proceeding
on the date below, the time period from If- 1.-f L I L- to excluded in computing
the time within which ( ) an information or indictment must be filed must commence. The Court fmds
that this exclusion of time serves the ends of justice and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a
speedy trial for easons discussed on the record and because
( given the reasonable likelihood that ongoing plea negotiations will result in a disposition of this case
without trial, the exclusion oftime will allow all counsel to focus their efforts on plea negotiations without the risk
that they would be denied the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation for trial, taking into account the
exercise of due diligence.
( ) __________________________________________ _
SO ORDERED.
Dated: Brooklyn, N. Y
20_
:?united States Magistrate Judge
J
s/ JMA
Case 1:11-cr-00850-SLT Document 13 Filed 01/04/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 123
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
V

__ l_':t.,_: ____________________________________ _
APPLICATION AND
ORDER OF EXCLUDABLE DELAY
Case No. It
'7
f I s
7 V ) 9
l\ U 'Yso (SL 1)
The United States of America and the defendant hereby jointly request that the time 0.
l /
1
/ \7 to .:2/ 3 J 1 7- be excluded from the computation of the time . ,
oJ S
( ) an infonnation or indictment must be filed, or (XW)
trial of the charges against defendant must commence. (XC) JAN 0 4 2012
The parties seek the exclusion of the foregoing period because
BROOKLYN OFFICE
they are engaged in plea negotiations, which they believe are likely to result in a disposition of this
case without trial, and they require an exclusion of time in order to focus efforts on plea negotiations without the risk
that they would not, despite their diligence, have reasonable time for effective preparation for trial,
()<:l they need additional time to prepare for trial due to the complexity of case,
( )
c:w!UU1advised by counsel ofhis/ber rights guaranteed under the
dy ria1Actofl974, 18U.S.C. 3161-74;theplanandrulesof
50(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The defendant
efore a jury within a specified time not counting periods excluded.
For U.S. Attorney, E.D.N.Y.
The joint application of the United Sites pf America and the defen
on the date below, the time period from I_'-{ / 1-- to --""'-t.L.J':!---<=. s hereby excluded in computing
the time within which ( ) an infonnation or indictment must be filed or (
that this exclusion oft" serves the ends of justice and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a
speedy trial for th easons discussed on the record and because
( given the reasonable likelihood that ongoing plea negotiations will result in a disposition of this case
without the exclusion of time will allow all counsel to focus their efforts on plea negotiations without the risk
that they would be denied the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation for trial, taking into account the
exercise of due diligence.
( ) ______________________________________________ __
SO ORDERED.
Dated: Brooklyn, N. Y
20_
United States Magistrate Judge
s/ JMA
Case 1:11-cr-00850-SLT Document 13 Filed 01/04/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 124