Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2002 - 2012 Equipment for the chemical weapon destruction (15 M) Low Level Radioactive Waste Incinerator (11 M) Securing of Spent Nuclear Fuel stored in Gremikha (46 M) Redirection of former military scientists (2.8 M) Bio-security (2 M) Disused Radioactive Sources securing (6 M) - RTG in Russia and DRS in Ukraine Nuclear Power Plant safety (2 M); AIDA (1 M) CEA is in charge of the Bilateral projects on behalf of the French government. Rosatom is our counterpart in Russia. Coordination with other countries and international organizations.
Securing of the Spent Nuclear Fuel stored on Gremikha site - the former soviet submarine base in North-West of Russia
Many French and Russian organizations have been involved: AREVA, RosRAO, SevRAO, Kourchatov institut, RIAR, NIKIET, IPPE, OKBM, VNIPIET, and many others. Most important Project Gremikha SNF securing Web site :http://www-pmg8.cea.fr/
31 Oct. - 1 Nov. 2011 AtomEco, Moscow
AtomEco, Moscow
SNF removal
Alpha VVR
VVR
SFA with 20% enrichment (U5) 900 SFA stored in poor conditions From those SFA : 2/3 deterioration is not very strong, so accepted for reprocessing 1/3 - severely deteriorated, so couldnt be accepted for reprocessing
RIIAR - Dimitrovgrad
Mayak
AtomEco, Moscow
AtomEco, Moscow
SNF removal
Main steps
Radiation protection (equipment & cleaning up) Feasibility studies Refitting of infrastructure needed for SNF removal Detailed inventory of the VVR SFA Feasibility studies on the end-destination sites Safety studies (criticality, impact on environment and staff); Training to react to any accident situation Removal of non-deteriorated VVR SFA Refitting of the deteriorated VVR SFA New crane at ATOMFLOT Removal of the refitted VVR SFA Refitting of the infrastructure on the Mayak Preparation of the infrastructure renovation at RIIAR (to be funded be EBRD)
AtomEco, Moscow
Gremikha
RIIAR
MAYA K
AtomEco, Moscow
AtomEco, Moscow
AtomEco, Moscow
Feasibility studies
KIRO: Engineering investigation of the initial state (radiological, equipment, civil constructions, etc.) DON: Declaration of Intentions OBIN: Justification of Investment Analysis of different solutions for the site remediation Proposal of the optimal ones (time, cost, safety, etc.) General Safety Analysis Report General Environment Impact Analysis
3.2 4.2 3.1 1.1 2.1 2.2 4.1 4.3
Refitting of infrastructure
Electricity supply (normal and back-up) Cranes, buildings, roads, DOC 10, fire fighting, Radioactive waste building
1.1 6 11 ;
2.1 6 11 ; 2.2 6 11 ;
75 / 20 / 32
75 / 20
-127
5.1 -127 1; 5.2 -127 6 11 . 5.3 -127 ( 515).
-127
6.1. -127.
-10
7.1 - -10. 7.2 - -127 . 7.3 -127 ( ). 7.4 -127 -. 7.5 - "".
AtomEco, Moscow
AtomEco, Moscow
10
AtomEco, Moscow
11
AtomEco, Moscow
12
Specific equipment
AtomEco, Moscow
13
AtomEco, Moscow
14
Alpha cores
AtomEco, Moscow
15
AtomEco, Moscow
16
Main achievements
CEAs contribution till the end of 2012
Dose rate reduced / Infrastructure refurbished Feasibility studies realised (KIRO, DON & OBIN) Staff equipped correctly 846 SFA VVR removed Alpha n910 Decontaminated Unloaded Alpha n900 reactor removed from the hull Budget 2004-2011 ROSATOM 50 M Donors 41 M (including CEA = 33 M, EBRD = 6.4 M and EC = 1.2 M) In progress : Refitting of hot cell at Mayak Preparation of infrastructure refitting at RIIAR
disassembling removal
partnership
Research of possible SFA fragments (K-15) Hot cell at Mayak Crane at Atomflot RIIAR equipment & mounting mounting expertise for EBRD
assistance
AtomEco, Moscow
17
AtomEco, Moscow
18