Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The authoritative interpretation of the court of a statute acquires the force of law by becoming a part thereof
Contemporanea expositio est optima et fortissima in lege
Littera necat spiritus vivificate Verba intentioni, non e contra, debent inservire.
The contemporary construction is strongest in law Custom is the best interpreter of the law
Regula pro lege, si deficit lex.
Words ought to be more subservient to the intent and not the intent to the words
Laws are to be more liberally interpreted, in order that their intent may be preserved
QUI HARET IN LITERA HARET IN CORTICE
He who considers merely the letter of an instrument goes but skin deep into its meaning
QUANDO VERBA STATUTI SUNT SPECIALIA, RATIO AUTEM GENERALIA, STATUTUM GENERALITER EST INTELLIGENDUM
When a law is special, but its reason or object general, the law is to be understood generally
10 11 Cessante rationi legis, cessat et ipsa lex
When the reason of the law ceases, the law itself ceases
Interpretatio talis in ambiguis semper fienda est ut evitetur inconveniens et absurdum LEGIS CONSTRUCTIO NON FACIT INJURIAM
Follow past precedents and do not disturb what has been settled
Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium
Public interest requires that by the very nature of things there must be end to a legal controversy.
6 Index animi sermo est
Where there is ambiguity, such interpretations as will avoid inconvenience and absurd it is to be adopted. The construction of law does no injury.
ARGUMENTUM AB INCONVENIENTI PLURIMUM VALET IN LEGE.
An argument drawn from inconvenience is of the greatest weight in law. It is better that words should have no operation at all than that they should operate absurdly,
Verba nihil operari melius est quam absurde
It is dangerous construction which is against the text. The spoken word perishes, but the written word remains
Clausula rebus sic stantibus
Where the same reason exists, there the same law prevails. An argument drawn from a similar case, or analogy, avails in law In like cases the judgment is the same Where there is the same reason, there is the same law That interpretation is to be adopted which is free from evil or injustice. An unjust law is no law at all
13 Fiat justitia, ruat coelum.
When language of law is clear, no explanation of it is required. The law may be harsh, but that is the law.
Hoc quidem perquam durum est, sed ita lex scripta est.
What is good and equitable is the law of all laws To swear is to call God to witness, and is an act of religion
9 Ratio legis est anima legis
Nulla potential supra legis esse debet Jurae naturae aequum est neminem cum alterius detrimento et injuria fieri locupletiorem.
The fact that a statute is silent, obscure or insufficient with respect to a question before the court will not justify the latter from declining to render judgment thereon.
15 -
23 24
A general statement is understood in a general sense. What is generally spoken shall be generally understood
25
False description does not preclude construction nor vitiate the meaning of the statute.
NIL FACIT ERROR NOMINIS CUM DE CORPORE VEL PERSONA CONSTAT.
VERBA MERE AEQUIVOCA, SI PER COMMUNEM USUM LOQUENDI IN INTELLECTU CERTO SUMUNTUR, TALIS INTELLECTUS PREFERNDUS EST. VERBA ARTIS EX ARTE.
manifest.
In the case of words merely equivocal, if they are taken by the common usage of speech in a certain sense, such sense is to be preferred.
VERBA GENERALIA RESTRINGUNTUR AD HABILITATEM REI VEL PERSONAM.
Ibi quid generaliter conceditur, inest haec exceptio, si non aliquid sit contras jus basque
Where anything is granted generally, this exception is implied; that nothing shall be contrary to law and right.
18 Summum jus, summa injuria
General words must be narrowed either to the nature of the subject matter or to the aptitude of the perso
26 27 28 29 30 Ubi lex non distinguit necnon distinguere debemus. Dissimilum dissimilis est ratio. Noscitur a sociis.
The rigor of the law is the height of oppression. Extreme law is often extreme wrong
Where the law does not distinguish, we should not distinguish. Of things dissimilar, the rule is dissimilar. Word construed words
Ejusdem generis.
19
The express mention of one person, thing or consequence implies the exclusion of all others. What is expressed puts an end to that which is implied
In eo quod plus sit, simper inest et minus CUI JURISDICTIO DATA EST, EA QUOQUE CONCESSA ESSE VIDENTUR SINE QUIBUS JURISDICTIO EXPLICARI NON POTUIT
31 32
Argumentum a contrario.
Negative-opposite doctrine
Casus omissus pro omission habendus est
To whomsoever a jurisdiction is given, those things are also supposed to be granted, without which the jurisdiction cannot be exercised. The grant of jurisdiction implies the grant of all powers necessary to its exercise
21 Ubi jus, ibi remedium.
A person, object or thing omitted from an enumeration must be held to have been omitted intentionally.
Ad proximum antecedens fiat relation nisi impediatur sentential.
33
Relative words refer to the nearest antecedents, unless the context otherwise requires
Reddendo singula singulis.
34
Referring each to each; referring each phrase or expression to its appropriate object; or let each be put in its proper place
Exceptio firmat regulam in casibus non exceptis.
No man should be allowed to take advantage of his own wrong. Where each party is equally in fault, the law favors him who is actually in possession
35
A thing not being excepted must be regarded as coming within the purview of the general rule
36
44
There can be no legal right as against the authority that makes the law on which the right depends.
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt.
The explanation should arise out of the wholse subject-matter; the exposition of a statute should be made from all its parts together,
INJUSTUM EST NISI TOTA LEGE INSPECTA, DE UNA ALIQUA EJUS PARTICULA PROPOSITA INDICARE VEL RESPONDERE.
45
It is unjust to decide or respond as to any particular part of a law without examining the whole of the law.
NEMO ENIM ALIQUAM PARTEM RECTE INTELLIGERE POSSIT ANTEQUAM TOTUM ITERUM ATQUE ITERUM PERLEGERIT. EX ANTECEDENTIBUS ET CONSEQUENTIBUS FIT OPTIMA INTERPRETATIO.
The laws aid the vigilant, not those who slumber on their rights.
46 Lex prospicit, non respicit.
No one is able rightly to understand one part before he has again and again read through the whole. A passage in a statute is best interpreted by reference to what precedes and what follows it.
VERBA POSTERIMA PROPTER CERTITUDINEM ADDITA AD PRIORA QUAE CERTITUDINE INDIGENT SUNT REFERENDA.
The law provides for the future, the judge for the past. A new statute should affect the future, not the past.
Nova constitutio futuris formam imponere debet non praeteritis. LEGES QUAE RETROSPICIUNT, ET MAGNA CUM CAUTIONE SUNT ADHIBENDAE NEQUE ENIM JANUS LOCATUR IN LEGIBUS. LEGES ET CONSITUTIONES FUTURIS CERTUM EST DARE FORMAM NEGOTIIS, NON AD FACTA PRAETERITA REVOCARI, NISI NOMINATIM ET DE PRAETERITO TEMPORE ET ADHUB PENDENTIBUS NEGOTIIS CAUTUM SIT. 47 48 Nullum crimen sine poena, nulla poena sine lege. There is no crime without a penalty, and there is no penalty without a law. Favorabilia sunt amplianda, odiosa restringenda. Where there is ambiguity, such interpretations as will avoid inconvenience and absurdit is to be adopted Leges posteriores ppriores contrarias abrogant. A later law repeals a prior law on the same subject which is repugnant thereto. Generalia specialibus non derogant. A general law does not nullify a specific or special law. IGNORANTIA LEGIS NEMINEM EXCUSAT.
Subsequent words, added for the purpose of certainty, are to be referred to the preceding words which require the certainty.
37 38 Interpretatio fienda est ut res magis valeat quam pereat. Pari materia.
A law should be interpreted with a view to upholding rather than destroying it. Relating to some matter
Every statute must be so construed and harmonized with other statutes as to form uniform system of law.
39 Distingue tempora et concordabis jura. Distinguish times and you will harmonize laws. Tempora mutantur et leges mutantur in illis Mutatis mutandi 40 -
49 50 a b
IN OBSCURIS INSPICI SOLERE QUOD VERISIMILIUS EST, AUT QUOD PLERUMQUE FIERI SOLET.
In obscure cases, we usually look at what is most probable, or what most commonly happen
c AD EA QUAE FREQUENTIUS ACCIDUNT JURA ADAPTATUR.
The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intention were so.
Actus me invito factus non est menus actus.
JUS CONSTITUI OPORTET IN HIS QUAE UT PLURIMUM ACCIDUNT NON QUAE EX INORDINATO. QUOD SEMEL AUT BIS EXISTIT PRAETEREUNT LEGISLATORIES. d NIGRUM NUNQUAM EXCEDERE DEBET RUBRUM.
Laws ought to be made with a view to those cases which happen most frequently, and not to those which are of rare or accidental occurrence.
Privileges are to be interpreted in accordance with the will of him who grants them.
Strictissimi juris.
43
The black should never go beyond the red. (The text of a statute should never be read in a sense more comprehensive than the rubric or title.)