Ruben Safrastyan: Arab countries have to use Turkish help The head of the Institute of Oriental Studies of the

Armenian Academy of Science s, professor Ruben Safrastyan, told VK his views on recent geopolitical changes in the Middle East, their reasons and consequences. How can the developments in the Middle East and possible Islamization of the countries covered by the Arab revolutions influence Armenia, which is situa ted in the unstable region? It is true that Armenia is a part of the region. However, our country ha s different political and cultural traditions; at the same time, it is involved in the Collective Security Treaty Organization. Considering this fact, the devel opments in Arab countries wont touch Armenia. On the other hand, because of the r ecent revolutions, the position of the Armenian Diaspora has worsened in these c ountries. The new authorities of Egypt dont prevent Muslims from attacking Egypti an Copts. The ruling regime of Bashar Assad provided Armenians with favorable li ving conditions in Syria. And now it is difficult to say what will happen after the overthrow of the regime. Do you think the tension in Turkish-Israeli relations indicates that Ank ara decided to sacrifice relations with Tel-Aviv in favor of neo-Ottoman aspirat ions? Today we are witnessing the collapse of the Israeli-Turkish strategic un ion, which was established and motivated by the USA. Israeli politicians are usi ng the fact of the Armenian genocide as a response to the hard Turkish position. This could lead to Israeli and Armenian organizations coming closer together, n ot only in Turkey, but also in the US. However, despite the political environmen t, every Jew has a stereotype that history saw one fact of genocide only - the H olocaust. Thus, if a bill on recognition of the Armenian genocide appears in the Knesset, which is doubtful, Israeli deputies will consider not only the politic al side of the issue, but also the moral and psychological aspects of the Holoca ust s unique character. -

There are some signs that all the recent changes will lead to the Islami sts success. Egypt is the first example of this. The West is trying to redirect the current situation to an outcome that will be favorable to its interests. Tu rkey is active in the region as well. Ankara is trying to influence developments , especially in Syria. So a tense political struggle between various political f orces is taking place in the Middle East. There are three types of force: pro-Is lamic, pro-Western and Turkish. After the end of the Cold War between the USSR and the USA, Turkey found itself useless as the NATO outpost in Western Asia. As for Syria, is Turkey ful filling a NATO mission or acting on its own? On the one hand, Turkey as a NATO member is still playing for the Wester n team. On the other hand, present-day Turkey is headed by Recep Erdogan and has its own objectives in the Middle East, trying to balance them and NATO interest s. But Ankaras interests are the priority for it. The authorities of Turkey have established close ties with pro-Islamic forces fighting Assads regime in Syria. S o Turkey is playing its own role in the region, relying on its own abilities. Tu rkey is trying to revive lost structures of the Ottoman Empire, which included A rab countries and peoples. Turkey is the only country in the world that is suppo rting the anti-government protests in Syria. All these Arab countries, passing t hrough a transition period, have to use Turkeys help and forget about preferences and dislikes of an historical nature.

Can the Arab Spring lead to the exclusive success of the Islamists?

Do you think Turkey can launch its army into Syria if it gets sanctions from the West? I think it can only be an indirect invasion of the Turkish army to Syria , and sanctions by NATO are needless. Turkey is warning about the establishment of a sanitary cordon at the Syrian border, and maybe this cordon will be moved to Syrian territory. It will be an indirect occupation. Erdogan threatens Assad with overthrowing the regime, but Turkey has no intention of doing it by force, it will use the Syrian opposition. However, there is a sensible circumstance. Syria owns major stocks of chemical w eapons, which were developed in case Israel attacks Syria with a nuclear weapon. If the situation in Syria continues to worsen, the question will arise: what sh ould they do with this chemical weapon arsenal? I think Turkey can launch its ar my to prevent radical Islamist groups from taking the arsenal, thus, Turkish tro ops will be launched into Syria only with this aim. "Vestnik Kavkaza" http://vestnikkavkaza.net/interviews/politics/20293.html