Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Geophysics Forum
http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=940
Geophysics Forum
Explore the myth underground, underwater and behind walls ... Skip to content
Advanced search Subscribe in a reader Board index General Geophysics Change font size Print view FAQ Register Login
Post a reply
6 posts Page 1 of 1
If we add a sharp break in the interval velocity (They have been made much faster in this model), the difference
1 de 6
22/04/2011 10:51
http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=940
Even with an inversion in interval velocities (the green layer is slower than that above it), the velocities that we would pick from the seismic data are still faster than the true averages.
Can we use the velocities determined from the moveout curves for anything? Well, with some fairly gross assumptions, we can use the formula derived by the American Geophysicist C. Hewitt Dix. This formula (known funnily enough as the Dix Formula) gives us an approximation of the interval velocity between any two points on our time/velocity graph established from the hyperbolas.
Taking V1 and V2 respectively as the velocities at times T1 and T2, VI is the interval velocity between these layers. This is an approximation, however, and works best for horizontal layers and small offsets. This table shows the first few points in a velocity function, and the calculation of interval velocity using the formula shown above.
2 de 6
22/04/2011 10:51
http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=940
The time is (typically) shown in milliseconds, and the "Vel" column shows the velocity that we have established for one particular location - the velocity that best "flattens" the moveout hyperbolas. The VI column shows the computed interval velocity between each point and the next, and the plot of the far right shows the complete sequence of interval velocities for the whole function. In general we can only use the interval velocities derived from the Dix formula as a rough guide. Under conditions of steeply dipping events or complex geology, the velocities we derive are not much more meaningful than just a set of numbers that "best-correct" the moveout hyperbola.
Now we've established what these velocities mean, how do we measure them? (My next post). .. Mohamed Gold Member Posts: 52 Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:48 pm Location: Houston, USA Top
3 de 6
22/04/2011 10:51
http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=940
New Resolution Geophysics Specialist airborne gravity and magnetic contractor www.airbornegeophysics.com National GPR Service Inc. A company with national reach offering subsurface investigations www.ngprs.com Brain Training Games Improve memory and attention with scientific brain games. www.lumosity.com
4 de 6
22/04/2011 10:51
http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=940
5 de 6
22/04/2011 10:51
http://forum.detectation.com/viewtopic.php?t=940
Seismic migration in practice in General Geophysics 2 48 by Mohamed Sun Apr 10, 2011 6:25 pm Marine seismic data filtering in General Geophysics 14 260 by Mohamed Sat Mar 19, 2011 10:48 am Seismic reflection data from refraction in Near Surface Geophysics 1 84 by tekarmah Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:56 pm Return to General Geophysics Jump to:
Heat Transmission Easy to use Simulation Software for steady and transient Heat Transfer www.smartcae.de Geoscience by Eriksfiord borehole image, geomechanics, reservoir modeling, sedi/frac/struc www.eriksfiord.com Potential field modelling 3D gravity and magnetic models. Geophysical Software Solutions P/L www.geoss.com.au
Ads by Google
Top Board index The team Delete all board cookies All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] Copyright 2009-2011 detectation.com. All rights reserved. info@detectation.com Powered by phpBB
6 de 6
22/04/2011 10:51