Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Root Locus traces the movement of the closed loop roots as an OLTF parameter (usually gain) is changed
Roots can be real or complex, so the s-plane has real and complex dimensions
Pole
A value of s which sends the Transfer Function to infinity (a root of the denominator) The poles of a Transfer Function are the same as the roots of a the characteristic equation
C(s) K ( s + 3) = = R(s) 1 + K s + (3 + K ) ( s + 3)
Location of the closed-loop pole is: s = -(3+K)
c(t)
1 s+2
Step 1: Obtain Open Loop Poles & Zeros (a) Root loci start at open-loop poles (b) Root loci end at open-loop zeros or infinity (c) The number of separate loci is equal to the number of open-loop poles (d) Loci are symmetrical about the real axis
Step 2: Sketch Root Loci on Real Axis (if existing) Real & Imaginary Axes Poles as x Zeros as o Locus is plotted
10
c =
p z
i i =1 i =1
nm
where n = number of open-loop poles m = number of open-loop zeros pi = location of ith pole zi = locaiton of ith zero
(0 1 2) (0) c = = 1 30
11
(1 + 2k ) = nm
k = 0, 1, 2, 3
(1 + 2k ) = = , , 5 3 3 30
12
13
s 3 + 3s 2 + 2 s + K = 0
s3 s2 s1 s0 1 3 1 2 3 K 3 K 2 K 0
(characteristic equation)
s3 s2 s1 s0
1 3 (6 K ) 3 K
2 K 0
14
3s2 + K = 0
Critical value of K = 6
3s2 + 6 = 0 s = j 2
15
j
Symmetrical about the Real axis
2
j
60o
-3
X -2
X
-1
-60o
Re
16
Root Locus Second Order Approximation Dominant Poles The transient response of a system may be equated to a sum of exponential terms
Contribution of each term is determined by one of the roots of the characteristic equation Each term does not contribute equally Some roots dominate the response
Example
17
Transient response
Total response is DOMINATED by decaying sinusoidal roots for this term much closer to Imaginary axis
18
Root Locus Second Order Approximation Since dominating roots are second order the system may be approximated by an equivalent second order system This gives us a system with well documented time responses.
Performance given in normalised form in terms of damping ratio () and natural frequency (n) The higher order system has been reduced to a second order approximation, making it possible to use available performance data to effect a successful design
19
Xo n = 2 X i s + 2 n s + n 2
s = n jn (1 )
2
20
P X
d=
0 Re cos
21
OP = ( n ) + n (1 )
2 2 2 2
OP = n + n (1 )
2 2 2 2 2
OP = n
d=
0 Re cos
n cos = = n
In the figure, cos defines the damping line and the distance of point P from the origin is equal to the natural frequency of the system
22
Determining Gain K
From the characteristic equation [ 1 + KGH (s) = 0 ]:
1 K= GH ( s)
1 K = GH ( s )
K ( s + z1 )( s + z 2 )( s + z3 ) L G(s) = ( s + p1 )( s + p2 )( s + p3 ) L
Then, from above, assuming unity feedback:
K=
s + p1 s + p2 s + p3 L s + z1 s + z 2 s + z3 L
23
Determining Gain K
If the location of the closed-loop pole is known, then K may be determined graphically: Q is the closed loop pole
If the real and imaginary axes of the root locus diagram have been drawn to the same scale then the lengths of vectors P1Q, P2Q, P3Q, and ZQ can be measured
PQ . P2Q . P3Q . K= 1 ZQ .
24
Example
Sketch the root locus of the system with an open loop transfer function: K
G(s) =
s ( s + 1)( s + 2)
Determine the value of K which would give an equivalent damping ratio of 0.5
cos(0.5) = 60 o
25
j
In order to sketch the root locus for the closed loop system, we need to determine the angle of emergence of the locus from the complex poles The angle of emergence can be determined using the angle condition
X
is angle of emergence
Re
26
1 2 3 = 180.( 1 + 2n)
27
180.( 1 + 2n) = Z P1 P 2 P 3
Or:
28
29
180.( 1 + 2n) = Z P1 P 2 P 3 P 4
180 = -33.7-126.9-90- 3 3 = -430.6 = -70.6
30
1 = 180 tan-1 (4/4) = 135o 2 = tan-1 (4/6) = 33.7o 4 = 90o = 180 tan-1 (4/3) = 126.9o Apply:
180.( 1 + 2n) = Z P1 P 2 P 3
180 = 126.9-135-22.7-90- 3 3 = -300.8 60
31
180.( 1 + 2n) = Z P1 P 2 P 3
180 = 135-90- 3 3 = -120.8
32
1 s 2 + 2s + 5
P1 X
j
P1
P1 = -1 + 2j P3 = 0
P2 = -1 2j
Set Q to be just to the right of P1 2 = 90o 3 = 180 tan-1 (2/1) = 117o 180 = -387- 1 1 = -27
P2 X
P2
P3
P3
Re
33
c =
P Z
i i =0 i =0
nm
(1 1) 0 =2 3 30
(1 + 2k ) = , , 5 3 3 30
34
1 s
Hydraulic Actuator
1 s 2 + 2n s + n
2
c(t)
Mass-spring-damper (load)
Load Dynamics
Looking at gain where < 1 (i.e. underdamped) Varying K (0 K ), the closed system root locus looks like: Is the second order approximation valid for K giving pole set A? What about B?
P1 X
Pole set A Pole set B Actuator
P3 Re P2 X
35
36
K G( s) H ( s) = s( s + a)
a>0
This gives two poles, one at the origin and the other at a. The following slides show the effect of adding additional poles and zeros to the shape of the Root Locus
From Glonaraghi & Kuo, Automatic Control Systems, 9th Edition, 2010, pp385-388
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Tutorial Question
Plot the Root Locus by hand for both of these: 1.
2.
44
45