Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Target costing is the process of determining the maximum allowable cost for a new product and then developing a prototype that can be profitably made for that maximum target cost figure. A number of companies--primarily in Japan--use target costing, including Compaq, Culp, Cummins Engine, Daihatsu Motors, DaimlerChrysler, Ford, Isuzu Motors, ITT, NEC, and Toyota etc. The target costing for a product is calculated by starting with the product's anticipated selling price and then deducting the desired profit. Following formula or equation further explains this concept: Target Cost = Anticipated selling price Desired profit The product development team is then given the responsibility of designing the product so that it can be made for no more than the target cost. Following set of activities further explains the concept of target costing technique: TARGET COSTING PROCESS DIAGRAM Determine Customer Wants and Price Sensitivity
Costs are Considered Throughout this Process. The Process Requires Trade-offs to Meet Target Costs
Once Target Cost is Achieved the Manufacturing Begins and Product is Sold
This $22.5 target cost would be broken into target cost for the various functions: manufacturing, marketing, distribution, after-sales service, and so on. Each functional area would be responsible for keeping its actual costs within target.
Target costing has the following main advantages or benefits: 1. Proactive approach to cost management. 2. Orients organizations towards customers. 3. Breaks down barriers between departments. 4. Implementation enhances employee awareness and empowerment. 5. Foster partnerships with suppliers. 6. Minimize non value-added activities. 7. Encourages selection of lowest cost value added activities. 8. Reduced time to market. Target costing approach has the following main disadvantages or limitations: 1. Effective implementation and use requires the development of detailed cost data. 2. its implementation requires willingness to cooperate 3. Requires many meetings for coordination 4. May reduce the quality of products due to the use of cheep components which may be of inferior quality.