Prosecution had applied to include website address and title of allegedly seditious article. Defence said amendment would be contrary to section 158 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Charge carries a penalty of up to RM5,000 fine or three years' jail upon conviction.
Original Description:
Original Title
TheSun 2008-11-11 Page07 Court Dismisses Bid to Amend RPKs Charge
Prosecution had applied to include website address and title of allegedly seditious article. Defence said amendment would be contrary to section 158 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Charge carries a penalty of up to RM5,000 fine or three years' jail upon conviction.
Prosecution had applied to include website address and title of allegedly seditious article. Defence said amendment would be contrary to section 158 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Charge carries a penalty of up to RM5,000 fine or three years' jail upon conviction.
amend RPK’s charge by Tan Yi Liang the prosecution had just added two elements newsdesk@thesundaily.com which had been objected to by the defence dur- ing the last trial sessions in October. PETALING JAYA: The sessions court here yes- “It is an editorial, but it forms part of the ingre- terday rejected an application by the prosecution dients of the charge, so that the accused under- to amend the sedition charge against Malaysia- stands the charge against him. We are adding two Today editor Raja Petra Kamarudin (RPK). ingredients to make it clearer,” Ishak said. The prosecution had applied to include the The court then moved on to hear testimony website address and title of the allegedly sedi- from two witnesses – senior digital forensic tious article, Let’s send the Altantuya murderers analyst S. Sivanathan and ASP Wa’ie Isqual Kria to hell, which was not present in the original Abdullah. article appended with the sedition charge. Sivanathan, who was questioned on a forensic Judge Rozina Ayob agreed with the defence investigation report of the computers seized from that an amendment to the charge would be Raja Petra by the police, told the court there were contrary to section 158 of the Criminal Procedure several elements found in the forensic log which Code, and that it was prejudicial to the accused indicated that someone had used a Dell desktop to amend it at such a late stage. and an Asus laptop to access the Malaysia-Today “The charge is a substitution. We have gone website with “administrator privileges”. through it, and there are sections where even Asked to clarify what “administrator privi- words are changed,” defence counsel Gobind leges” were, Sivanathan said that such privileges Singh Deo said. allow a user to maintain the website. “The question that comes to mind is this: is He said however that while some people may this the original, or is this another document that log in with administrator rights, it was possible has been typed up by the police officer?” asked to create usernames and passwords with lesser Gobind, who submitted that the amendment was privileges. a sign that the prosecution “has no case”. He said while there was evidence in the log “It is our submission that the prosecution realis- indicating that files had been uploaded to Malay- es that they have no chance. They should withdraw sia-Today from the computers, he was unable to the charge and admit that it is baseless.” determine the type of file uploaded to the news Raja Petra is charged with committing sedition portal. through the article posted on www. malaysia-today. Meanwhile, Wa’ie, who was called to testify on net from his house on Jalan BRP 5/5, Bukit Rahman the forensic log made by him for the investigating Putra in Sungai Buloh on April 25 this year. officer, DSP Mahfuz Abdul Majid, said that while The charge carries a penalty of up to RM5,000 he prepared the logs from his forensic analysis fine or three years’ jail or both upon conviction. of both the laptop and the desktop, he did not Deputy public prosecutor Ishak Mohd Yusoff look beyond Mahfuz’s request to find evidence refuted the severity of the amendments, claiming pertaining to the investigation on Raja Petra.
Habeas corpus application withdrawn
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court yesterday al- tion order,” Malek Imtiaz told the court. lowed an application by blogger Raja Petra Raja Suraya said that since the matter had become Kamaruddin, freed from detention under the academic, the court was allowing the application Internal Security Act last Friday, to withdraw his and that it was up to Raja Petra, if he wished, to habeas corpus application of Sept 16 for release seek civil action over his detention. from ISA custody. Earlier, senior federal counsel Najib Zakaria said Justice Suraya Othman granted the application the Home Ministry and the Kamunting Detention after Raja Petra’s counsel Malek Imtiaz Sarwar Centre had no objection to the application. made an oral application to the court yesterday. Raja Petra filed the application on Sept 16 “My client instructed me to withdraw it (the on the grounds that his detention was unlawful application) in view of the Shah Alam High Court and that the home minister had contravened the decision to free him from the two-year ISA deten- Federal Constitution with his action. – Bernama
Altantuya murder trial
Duo to make defence on Jan 15 SHAH ALAM: Two police commandos, Chief defence,” he said. Kamarul Hisham also Insp Azilah Hadri and Cpl Sirul Azhar Umar, requested the court for more time to get will have to wait until Jan 15 next year to hold of blogger Raja Petra Raja Kamaruddin make their defence in the High Court here and private investigator P. Balasubramaniam on a charge of murdering Mongolian national whom he intended to call as witnesses. Altantuya Shaariibuu. “I have written a letter to his solicitor on This is because their respective counsel, Oct 21, but there was no response from Raja Datuk Hazman Ahmad and Kamarul Hisham Petra’s lawyers. We have also sent messages Kamaruddin, were unable to locate and inter- to the lawyers and the law firm, we have yet view witnesses whom they planned to call. to receive a reply,” he said. Justice Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin al- Raja Petra, who was recently released lowed their applications for two months’ from Internal Security Act (ISA) detention, grace to prepare their cases. had made a statutory declaration linking a “I want this case to be tried continuously top politician and his wife to the murder. from Jan 15 until the end,” he said. Balasubramaniam had also made a similar Azilah, 32, and Sirul Azhar, 36, both from statutory declaration but retracted it three the Special Action Squad, were to make their days later in another sworn statement. defence today on a charge of murdering Altan- Kamarul Hisham said he was informed tuya, 28, in Mukim Bukit Raja between 10pm on by the prosecution that investigating officer Oct 19, 2006, and 1am the following day. Tony Lunggan could not locate Balasubra- In his application yesterday, Hazman said maniam’s whereabouts and this matter was he could not decide who to call to testify be- confirmed by deputy public prosecutor Tun cause he could not interview the witnesses Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah. as some of them were not in Kuala Lumpur. Tun Majid said he had no objections to the He said he was also pressed for time to postponement, but notified the court that he settle all his other pending trials from 2003 to would raise an objection under section 136 2006, which had been put on hold to give way of the Evidence Act pursuant to the defence’s to Altantuya’s trial, as the presiding judges intention to recall some of the prosecution were getting impatient and had disallowed witnesses, including Balasubramaniam. postponements. Outside the court, Hazman told the media “The prosecution has taken a year and that he planned to call nine witnesses, in- a half to prosecute this case. We must also cluding an expert in telecommunication and be given space and time to prepare the Azilah’s girlfriend. – Bernama