Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Methods
Henk Roest
Onderzoeksopzet
Achtergrond probleem Probleemstelling Literatuur Methode en analyse Resultaten Aanbevelingen
Onderzoeksopzet
Achtergrond probleem Probleemstelling Literatuur Methode Resultaten Aanbevelingen
Tevredenheidsscores
Service items Klanten percepties Management percepties van klanten percepties
Betrokkenheid personeel Responsiviteit Betrouwbaarheid Informatie voorziening Bereikbaarheid Bescherming privacy Betaalbaarheid Onderhoud
Belangrijkheidsscores
Service items Klanten percepties Management percepties van klanten percepties
Betrokkenheid personeel Responsiviteit Betrouwbaarheid Informatie voorziening Bereikbaarheid Bescherming privacy Betaalbaarheid Onderhoud
Picture of Synthetron
Conjoint Analysis
Verschillende variaties cameras: Merk: Canon versus Medion Prijs: 300 versus 400 euro Sensor: 8 versus 12 mega pixels Techniek: spiegel reflex versus compact
Resultaten
Literature
In order to assess product expectations consumers frequently use cues (Olson, 1972; Bao et al., 2011) Cues may be diagnostic on a single product attribute or multiple attributes (Steenkamp, 1990; Chang, 2008, Myazaki et al., 2005) Usually category membership is assessed first and product quality second (Bruner, 1957)
Observations
Consumers use similar cues to infer product quality and category membership Some cues may be more diagnostic than others in signaling either/both properties People prefer the best quality offered within a product category
Managerial problem
Which cues should be stressed in product development and marketing communications, considering that:
certain cues trigger category membership and consequently a bundle of experiencebased category expectations that are attributed towards the focal brand? certain cues are related to a single attribute expectation of a focal brand?
Theoretical problems
Research has focussed on which cues are used to infer either product quality or category membership Different techniques have been developed to determine the predictive value on either constructs
Research objectives
Develop a method that determines the relative predictive values of different cues simultaneously Determine the predictive quality value and the predictive prototypical value of selected cues Assess the relationships between these values
Method
113 visitors of restaurants 24 (profiles) fractional factorial x 2 (categories) x 2 (situations) withinsubjects design conjoint analysis
Purchase intention
close friends business relatives
Cue values
Predictive values: relative importances in assessing quality (dimensions), cost, category membership, intention part-worths Discriminative values: extent to which the cue quality association is concentrated on a single quality dimension:
DV ci = maximum deviation of PVcid
7
PV
D =1
cid
DVci is the discriminant value of cue c for subject i, and PVcid is the predictive value of cue c for subject i on each of the quality dimensions d.
Construct
F-Value
D.F
Predictive Cost Value Predictive Quality Values Overall Quality Empathy Ambiance Professionalism Reliability Service scapes Privacy Access Discriminative Value
4.90
3;440
.00
.19a
Construct
F-Value
D.F.
Prototypicality Value
27.35 48.41
3;444 3;448
.00
.20a .17a,b
.25a .23ab
.36a
.20a .22a
.00
.39a
14.10
3;448
.00
.17a,b .14a,b,c
.33a
.26ab .38a
.23a .20a,bc
47.11 3;448
.00
.28ab
Tukey's HSD; superscript versus subscript indices indicate significant differences between cue value means at p=.05. Table 1. Estimated Cue Values (ANOVA)
Results
Quality marks and interior have the highest, and brand name the lowest predictive value in assessing restaurant quality Quality marks also have the highest discriminant value, and interior and dress display the lowest Interior has the highest prototypical value Differences in purchase intention value for the two usage situations are apparent
Implications
Prototypical cues (i.e. dress) should be stressed:
First Systematically
Judgement A
John is jaloers, koppig, impulsief, kritisch, vlijtig, en intelligent. Over het algemeen genomen, hoe emotioneel denk je dat John is? (omcircel een number) 1 2 3 4 Helemaal niet emotioneel 5 6 7 8 9 Heel erg emotioneel
Judgement B
Jim is intelligent, vlijtig, kritisch, impulsief, koppig en jaloers. Over het algemeen genomen, hoe emotioneel denk je dat Jim is? (omcircel een number) 1 2 3 4 Helemaal niet emotioneel 5 6 7 8 9 Heel erg emotioneel
Research Question
What influences how much of the product the consumer uses?
Judgments about product effectiveness Supply on hand
Transparent containers
500 ml
full Half-full
Half-full
Quarter- full
97 ml
500 ml
121 ml
250 ml
Small bottle 87 ml
500 ml
136 ml
250 ml
First ANOVA Container size*fill level) Significant container size by fill-level interaction
10
Half-full
Quarter- full
97 ml
500 ml
121 ml
250 ml
Small bottle 87 ml
500 ml
136 ml
250 ml
First ANOVA Container size*fill level) Significant container size by fill-level interaction
Second ANOVA Container size*volume of liquid Significant main effect for volume of liquid
Results Discussion
Qt poured
Contrast Effect Large supply leads consumers to use more, so that the amount poured does not seem so small Assimilation Effect Supply and acceptable range of amounts to be used are perceived as similar
High
Moderate
Small
Supply on hand
Study 2
Objective: To find out whether usage decreases
with supply
11
Results Overview
Available supply influences the amount consumed on single-usage occasions A necessary and sufficient condition for supply to influence usage appears to be that the amount available be visually assessable Usage decreases as the supply diminishes
12
13
14
Empirisch Onderzoek
formalisatie empowerment bevoegdheid empowerment vaardigheid leiderschap informatie leiderschap werksfeer
0.21 0.32
werknemer tevredenheid
wat
technische kwaliteit
0.44 0.38
functionele kwaliteit
hoe 0.37
groep cohesie
15
Formule
aandeel 2005
aandeel 2006
groei
Marktaandelen supermarktketens
16
Typen Segmentatievariabelen
Objectief Algemeen niveau Inkomen Leeftijd Opleidingsniveau Woonplaats/postcode Gedragspatronen Subjectief Levensstijl Persoonlijkheid Instrumentele waarden Eindwaarden Interesses/opinies Perceptie Attitude Domeinspecifieke waarden Merktrouw (attitude) Preferentie Evaluatie
Domeinspecifiek Gebruiksfrequentie niveau Substitutie Complementariteit Waarneembar gedrag Merkspecifiek niveau Merktrouw (gedrag) Gebruiksfrequentie Handelingen Merkkennis Koopintentie
17
18
Indulging emotions
Mini
Agressive Impulsive
Jeep
Arrogant
Alfa.Romeo
Young
Smart
Energetic Lively Original Fun Spontaneous Fminin
Land.Rover Bmw
Masculine
Honda Lancia
Gentil
Social affirmation
Autoritarian
Renault Volkswagen
Sophisticated Elegant
Social Integration
Peugeot
Naive Dumb
Audi
Classy
Citron
Superficial
Seat
Simple
Shy
Mazda Nissan
Calm Characterless
Weak
Positioning Map
Multi Dimensional Scaling
Controlling emotions
Skoda
Daewoo
19
20