The Metaphysical Elements of Ethics
3/5
()
About this ebook
Immanuel Kant
Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher and is known as one of the foremost thinkers of Enlightenment. He is widely recognized for his contributions to metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and aesthetics.
Read more from Immanuel Kant
Kant: Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Introduction to Logic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Perpetual Peace: A Philosophic Essay Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Kant's Prolegomena: To Any Future Metaphysics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Quotable Kant Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals (Translated by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Kant’s Critiques: The Critique of Pure Reason; The Critique of Practical Reason; The Critique of Judgement Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Harvard Classics: All 71 Volumes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCritique of Judgment Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On the Metaphysics of Morals and Ethics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLogic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Logic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related to The Metaphysical Elements of Ethics
Related ebooks
The Metaphysical Elements of Ethics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Metaphysic Elements of Ethics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Kantian Ethics: Metaphysics of Morals, The Critique of Practical Reason & Perpetual Peace Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn the Metaphysics of Morals and Ethics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Ethical Principles of Immanuel Kant Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Philosophy of Moral: Collected Works on Ethics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGroundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals (Translated by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Basis of Morality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUtilitarianism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Critique of Judgement Part I: Critique of Aesthetic Judgement Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn the Ethics of Naturalism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Science of Mind Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntroduction to the Metaphysic of Morals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDoctrine of the Will Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntroduction to the Metaphysics of Morals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Critique of Practical Reason Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Possibility of Altruism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Critique of Practical Reason (Kritik der praktischen Vernunft) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Greatest Happiness Principle - Utilitarianism, On Liberty & The Subjection of Women: The Principle of the Greatest-Happiness: What Is Utilitarianism (Proofs & Principles), Civil & Social Liberty, Liberty of Thought, Individuality & Individual Freedom, Utilitarian Feminism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe John Stuart Mill Collection: Works on Philosophy, Politics & Economy (Including Memoirs & Essays) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJohn Stuart Mill: Collected Works: Utilitarianism, The Subjection of Women, On Liberty, Principles of Political Economy… Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Critique of Practical Reason (Theory of Moral Reasoning) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Philosophy For You
The Little Book of Stoicism: Timeless Wisdom to Gain Resilience, Confidence, and Calmness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Questions for Deep Thinkers: 200+ of the Most Challenging Questions You (Probably) Never Thought to Ask Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Buddha's Guide to Gratitude: The Life-changing Power of Everyday Mindfulness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Loving Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Courage to Be Happy: Discover the Power of Positive Psychology and Choose Happiness Every Day Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Letters from a Stoic: All Three Volumes Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Allegory of the Cave Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beyond Good and Evil Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bhagavad Gita Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Inward Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Frugal Hedonism: A Guide to Spending Less While Enjoying Everything More Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: Six Translations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Course in Miracles: Text, Workbook for Students, Manual for Teachers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Egyptian Book of the Dead: The Complete Papyrus of Ani Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lying Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Experiencing God (2021 Edition): Knowing and Doing the Will of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Be Perfect: The Correct Answer to Every Moral Question Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Meditations: Complete and Unabridged Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The School of Life: An Emotional Education: An Emotional Education Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The Metaphysical Elements of Ethics
4 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Metaphysical Elements of Ethics - Immanuel Kant
Preface
If there exists on any subject a philosophy (that is, a system of rational knowledge based on concepts), then there must also be for this philosophy a system of pure rational concepts, independent of any condition of intuition, in other words, a metaphysic. It may be asked whether metaphysical elements are required also for every practical philosophy, which is the doctrine of duties, and therefore also for Ethics, in order to be able to present it as a true science (systematically), not merely as an aggregate of separate doctrines (fragmentarily). As regards pure jurisprudence, no one will question this requirement; for it concerns only what is formal in the elective will, which has to be limited in its external relations according to laws of freedom; without regarding any end which is the matter of this will. Here, therefore, deontology is a mere scientific doctrine (doctrina scientiae). [One who is acquainted with practical philosophy is not, therefore, a practical philosopher. The latter is he who makes the rational end the principle of his actions, while at the same time he joins with this the necessary knowledge which, as it aims at action, must not be spun out into the most subtile threads of metaphysic, unless a legal duty is in question; in which case meum and tuum must be accurately determined in the balance of justice, on the principle of equality of action and action, which requires something like mathematical proportion, but not in the case of a mere ethical duty. For in this case the question is not only to know what it is a duty to do (a thing which on account of the ends that all men naturally have can be easily decided), but the chief point is the inner principle of the will namely that the consciousness of this duty be also the spring of action, in order that we may be able to say of the man who joins to his knowledge this principle of wisdom that he is a practical philosopher.]
Now in this philosophy (of ethics) it seems contrary to the idea of it that we should go back to metaphysical elements in order to make the notion of duty purified from everything empirical (from every feeling) a motive of action. For what sort of notion can we form of the mighty power and herculean strength which would be sufficient to overcome the vice-breeding inclinations, if Virtue is to borrow her arms from the armoury of metaphysics,
which is a matter of speculation that only few men can handle? Hence all ethical teaching in lecture rooms, pulpits, and popular books, when it is decked out with fragments of metaphysics, becomes ridiculous. But it is not, therefore, useless, much less ridiculous, to trace in metaphysics the first principles of ethics; for it is only as a philosopher that anyone can reach the first principles of this conception of duty, otherwise we could not look for either certainty or purity in the ethical teaching. To rely for this reason on a certain feeling which, on account of the effect expected from it, is called moral, may, perhaps, even satisfy the popular teacher, provided he desires as the criterion of a moral duty to consider the problem: If everyone in every case made your maxim the universal law, how could this law be consistent with itself?
But if it were merely feeling that made it our duty to take this principle as a criterion, then this would not be dictated by reason, but only adopted instinctively and therefore blindly.
But in fact, whatever men imagine, no moral principle is based on any feeling, but such a principle is really nothing else than an obscurely conceived metaphysic which inheres in every man’s reasoning faculty; as the teacher will easily find who tries to catechize his pupils in the Socratic method about the imperative of duty and its application to the moral judgement of his actions. The mode of