Real Time 3D Universal Mechanics

Annexing quantum mechanics to classical mechanics And deleting make believe relativistic and quantum mechanics And all other non 3D confusions of physics
Professor Joe Nahhas July 4th 1973 joenahhas1958@yahoo.com

Real time: We can not see or measure something that did not happen. We can only see and measure something that had happened. What we measure in not what happened. We measure in present time an event that happened in past time. That is we measure past events in present time Present time = present time Present time = past time + [present time - past time] Present time = past time + relativistic time delays Real time = event time + real time relativistic delays Real time physics = Event time physics + real time relativistic delays physics What one sees is relativistic = What happened in an absolute event + relativistic delays What happened in an event is absolute = Real time physics - real time relativistic effects. Observer time = traveller time + time delays Real time = absolute time + time delays Real time Mechanics = Event time Mechanics + time delay Mechanics Page 1

If a bicycle is ridden in a circle of radius r making an angle from a fixed starting point and going at a circular speed v then the angular speed of the bicycle is the angle change d the bicycle traces from the fixed point starting point divided by time interval d t it travels or the angular speed is: The angular speed is ' = d / d t = orbital velocity/ radius = v/r Physicists deduce and not measure planetary motion around the sun which includes distance speed angular speeds among other things from data collected from planets motion seen through telescopes on Earth. Physicists deduce the average distance r between the planets and the Sun. Also, deduce planets orbital speed v around the Sun and they deduce the angular speed ' = orbital velocity/ radius = v/r. Physicists can not measure planets motion angular speed around the Sun directly. In day time there is Sun and they can not see the planets At night time there is no Sun see or measure and they can see the planets So, astronomers measure planets motion around Earth using an imaginary astronomical sphere attached to moving Earth axes and fixed stars. After astronomers measure planets motion seen from Earth they deduce the planets motion around the Sun through adding or Subtracting Earth motion around the Sun. Earth- Sun motion is a very well known path. Physicists transfer their measurements data of planetary motion around the Sun from Earth telescopes data to conclude planetary motion around the sun data. During this mathematical data transfer process of Earth telescopes measurements to conclude planetary motion around the Sun a 400 years old mistake was/is made for all of past 400 years With r = planet average distance from the Sun And v = planet average speed around the sun And = the angle traced by a planet from a fixed point on the circumference of the planet orbit around the Sun when moving around the Sun. And = angular speed of a planet moving around the Sun Page 2

Planet Mercury Venus Earth Mars Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune Pluto

Distance r X 106km 58.2 108.2 149.6 227.936 778.412 1,426.725 2,870.97 4,498 5906.4

Planet Orbit T 88 224.7 365.26 687 4333 10760 30690 60180 90730

Orbit speed Less v in km/sec Earth speed 47.9 18.1 35.05 5.7 29.8 24.14 13.06 9.65 6.80 5.43 4.74

Spin speed km/sec .002 6.52 .46511 0.2411 12.6 9.87 2.59 2.68

Angular velocity; v/r arc sec/ century 70.29 10.86 4.1

The angular speed is ' = v/r For Mercury: ' = v/r = (47.9km/sec)/58,200,000 km = 0.000000843 radians/sec The accumulation value in arc sec /century W", then And W" = (v/r) [(180/) (3600) (26526/T)] = angular velocity in arc sec per century If it is measured for planet Mercury then W" (event time) = (47.9/58,200,000) (180/) (3600) (26526/88) W" (event time) = 70.29 arc second per century Physicists in 1859 found that there are 43 arc sec per century more than they expected. How did that happen? 400,000 of wrong physicists and 400 years of wrong physics said it is due to time travel! Time travel is not physics and all 400,000 space time physicists are wrong because I can prove them wrong. Here it is Real time Mechanics = Event time Mechanics + time delay Mechanics W" (real time) = W" (event time) + W" (time delays) W" (time delay) = (v/R) [(180/) (3600) (26526/T)]; R = Earth - Sun Distance For Mercury W" (time delay) = (47.9/149,600,000) (180/) (3600) (26526/88) = 43.0 " /century W" (real time) = W" (event time) + W" (time delays) W" (event time) = (v/r) [(180/) (3600) (26526/T)] W" (time delay) = (v/R) [(180/) (3600) (26526/T)] Page 3

W" (real time) = W" (event time) + W" (time delays) W" (real time) = (v/r) [(180/) (3600) (26526/T)] + (v/R) [(180/) (3600) (26526/T)] The 400 years old mistake was/is W" (time delay) = (v/R) [(180/) (3600) (26526/T)] Real time Mechanics = Event time Mechanics And this mistake: time delay Mechanics = Relativistic time travel The difference is a time delay which means that it results in visual effects and not real physics Yes I am saying that modern physics is wrong to say the least Yes I am saying that modern physics is stupid to say the least Yes I am adding that modern physics is stupidity itself In 1969 I was 12 and in 5th grade going to 6th grade and I studied the circle in classrooms that year. In kinder garden and elementary school early years, young kids are taught to waste time and color and scribble all kinds of shapes and figures. I attempted to draw nature including humans and my drawings of human faces and nature came out as pieces of geometrical figures. I drew faces and my drawings came out with a triangular jaw and circular eyes and oval lips and I realized that I would be better if my drawings were geometrical figures. From third grade and to 5th grade I had a set of rulers and a compass and plenty of papers and learned how to draw geometrical figures and after scribbling with rulers compass and got beyond drawing a circle I learned how to draw concentric circles and other geometric shapes and make complex shape made out of lines and circles. When I studied circles I learned about circumference ( x d = 3.14 x diameter) and learned about speed v ( x d/t; t = time) and learned about angular speed by dividing the speed by the radius r of the circle, or, angle traveled () per time (t) or the angular speed /t = v/r; r = radius. I practiced these formulas that summer of 1969 Hippie days and Wood stocks and music and a man on the moon. In summer of 1969 I drew three concentric circles: One with radius r (m) for bicycle one and named it after first planet Mercury Two with radius r (v) for bicycle two and named it after second planet Venus Three with radius r (e) for bicycle three and named it after third planet Earth Page 4

And assigned three speeds dreaming of space travel watching the space race One with speed v (m) for bicycle one and named it after first planet Mercury Two with speed v (v) for bicycle two and named it after second planet Venus Three with speed v (e) for bicycle three and named it after third planet Earth Then I made the division and got the angular speeds Or velocity/radius /t = v/r; with units of radians/second One angular speed v (m)/r (m) for bicycle one or first planet Mercury Two angular speed v (v)/ r (v) for bicycle two or second planet Venus Three angular speed v (e)/ r (e) for bicycle three or third planet Earth What is the angular velocity of mercury around the sun? It is v (m)/ r (m) The question is how the angular speed of Mercury around the sun was measured? Page 5

Answer: It was measured from the moving Earth because I do not believe that there are people on the Sun? How did astronomers measure the angular speed of planet Mercury and planet Venus around the Sun? A - At day time Astronomers can not measure planet Mercury's speed because they can not see the planets in day time. B- At night time Astronomers can not see the Sun but they can see Mercury and Venus. C- Planet Mercury and planet Venus angular speeds were not measured directly They were deduced. D- Planet Mercury and planet Venus angular speeds were deduced from direct measurements from the Astronomical Sphere with respect to fixed stars from moving earth. Earth motion around the sun was taken into consideration. Planets motion around the Earth was taken into consideration planetary motion around the Sun was deduced and in this deduction is 400 years wrong and correcting this deduction account for the apparent precession of perihelion motion of planets Mercury and Venus and this correction ends the validity of using the virus of stupidity of four dimensional relativity theory and quantum mechanics or quantum relativistic mechanics and ends the new strings of stupidity viruses of which string theory is one of many of stupid ideas. What was not taken into consideration is Earth - Planets visual effect or light aberrations visual effects along the line of sight. Measuring a quantity and deducing a quantity is not the same thing Real time Mechanics = Event time Mechanics + time delay Mechanics We measure in real time What we deduce is in event time The difference between theory and measurement is time delays The difference deduced answer and measurement is time delays Page 6

Planets motion was deduced from the celestial sphere calculations that is attached Planet Earth. Real time Mechanics = Event time Mechanics + time delay Mechanics Planetary distance around the Sun measured from Earth = planetary distance around the Sun deduced from Earth + [Planetary distance around the Sun measured from Earth - planetary distance around the Sun deduced from Earth] Dividing by time Planetary speed around the Sun measured from Earth = planetary speed around the Sun deduced from Earth + [Planetary speed around the Sun measured from Earth planetary speed around the Sun deduced from Earth]

Then, v* (orbital velocity of mercury measured from Earth)/r (Mercury distance from the sun) = v*(orbital velocity of mercury deduced from Earth)/r (Mercury distance from Sun) + [v* (orbital velocity of Earth measured from Earth) +/- v (spin velocity of Earth measured from Earth]/r (Mercury distance from the Sun) With v* meaning orbital speed and v meaning spin speed Actual value is ' = v/r = [v (m)/r] + [v* (e) + v (e)]/r Used value: ' = v/r = v (m)/r Missing Value ' = [v* (e) + v (e)]/r; radian per second The Mistake in arc second per century Is: '(e) = [v* (e) +/- v (e)]/r (180/) (3600) (36526/T) Where v* (e) = Earth orbital speed around the Sun; v = Earth spin speed For Mercury: the angular time delay is measured from Earth is calculated: And And And And And And v* (e) = Earth orbital velocity = 29.8 km/sec v (e) = Earth rotational velocity = 0.465 v* - v = 29.335km/sec r (Mercury) = (58.2 x 106 km) r = Mercury's (planet) mean distance ' = (29.335km/sec)/ (58.2 x 106 km) radians/second = [(29.335km/sec)/ (58.2 x 10 6 km)] [(180/) (3600) (36526/88)] arc sec /century = 43.1" arc-sec/100 years Page 7

Actual value is ' = v/r = v (m)/r + [v* (e) + v (e)]/r Real time Mechanics = Event time Mechanics + time delay Mechanics Or, [v (m)/r] + [v* (e) + v (e)]/r = [v (m)/r] + [v* (e) + v (e)]/r This mistake is due to French mathematician Le Verrier in his calculations of Mercury's orbit and his claim that Newtonian mechanics can not explain Mercury's angular velocity or Venus angular velocity The mistake for Planet Mercury is v (e)/r (m) = Earth speeds/Mercury - Sun distance When v (m)/r (m) was measured it was always had v (e)/r (m) added to it And when v (m)/r (m) measured at Perihelion it still had a v (e)/ r (m) added to it Per a century 36528 days v (e)/ T (m) days r (m); T (Mercury) = 88days In degrees W = 36528 days v (e)/ T (m) days r (m) x (180/) In minutes W '= 36528 days v (e)/ T (m) days r (m) x (180/) (60) In seconds W" = 36528 days v (e)/ T (m) days r (m) x (180/) (60) (60) = 43.0 "per century. With v (e) {Earth speed - Earth spin speed} = [29.8 km/sec - 0.465 km/sec] And r (m) = 58.2 x 10 9 m = mean distance of planet mercury from the sun. For planet Mercury W"(m) = [v (e)/ r (m)] [36528/T (m)] (180/) (3600) = 43.0"/century W"(m) = [29.335/ 58.2 x 10 9] [36528/88] (180/) (3600) = 43.0"/century The mistake for Planet Venus v (v)/r (m) = Earth speeds/Venus distance from Sun When v (v)/r (v) was measured it was always had v (e)/r (v) added to it And when v (v)/r (v) measured at Perihelion it still had a v (e)/ r (v) added to it Per a century 36528 days v (e)/ T (v) days r (m); T (Venus) = 224.7days In degrees/century W = 36528 days v (e)/ T (v) days r (v) x (180/) In minutes/century W '= 36528 days v (e)/ T (v) days r (v) x (180/) (60) Page 8

In seconds/century W" = 36528 days v (e)/ T (v) days r (v) x (180/) (60) (60) = 9.0 "per century. With v (e) {Earth speed - Earth spin speed} = [29.8 km/sec - 0.465 km/sec] And r (v) = 108.2 x 10 9 m = mean distance of planet mercury from the sun. For planet Venus W"(v) = [v (e)/ r (v)] [36528/T (v)] (180/) (3600) = 9.0"/century The mistake is for Planet Venus is v (e)/r (v) = [v* (e) +/- v (e)]/r (Venus) When v (v)/r (v) was measured it was always had An Extra v (e)/r (v) = [v* (e) +/- v (e)] /r (Venus) With T (v) = 224.7, v (e) = [29.8 km/sec - 0.465 km/sec]; r (v) = 108.2 x 10 9 m For Planet Venus W"(m) = [v (e)/ r (v)] [36528/T (v)] (180/) (3600) = 9.0"/century W"(v) = [29.335/ 108.2 x 10 9] [36528/224.7] (180/) (3600) = 9.0"/century The concentric circles games I played in 5th grade drawings and multiplying and dividing numbers gave me a hint and an idea in summer of 1972 when I read about planetary motion around the sun from a book about astronomers titled Copernicus Galileo Kepler's and Newton These numbers 43.0"/centuy and 9.0"/century were/are used as the First experimental

proofs of space time confusions of modern physics and they were/are the first proof of Einstein's general relativity theory.
This mistake that was made by the French mathematician of 43 seconds of an arc per century in deducing the orbital speed of planet mercury had led to the make believe or apparent advance of perihelion of planet Mercury. This mistake was/is generalized to planetary systems around their mother Sun and the wrong deduction mistake is applied to binary stars systems and to any two body systems. This mistake opened the door for 20th century mistake called modern physics and is taken as planet Mercurys play of hide and seek disappearing from space to imaginary time back to space modern physics stupidity called lost in space and found in time and found lost in space again. Being able to find new physics formulas that explain space to imaginary time back to space as a visual Illusion at age 14 made me realize that not only Einstein is wrong but all of physics and physicists are wrong for past 400 years. Page 9

But this was not the only find I discovered in summer of 1972

Kepler's equations were there to read and I discovered another one that gave me the same results But the Actual value is ' = v/r = [v (m) + v (M)]/r
And v (m) = [GM/ (m + M) a] And v (M) = [GM/ (m + M) a] And v (m) = [GM/ (m + M) a] + v (M) = [Gm/ (m + M) a] = [G (m + M)/ a] And ' = v/r = [v (m) + v (M)]/r

= [G (m + M)/ a] Radians per seconds In degree per century Then ' = { [G (m + M)/ a]} x (180/) (36526/T)

Advance of Perihelion
Mercury Advance of perihelion motion solution
With m = 0.23 x 10-6 M (0) and M = 1 M (0); G = 6.673 x 10- 11; a = 58.2 x 109 m And M (0) = 2 x 1030 kg; R (0) = 0.696 x 109 meters; T = 88 days

With ' = { [G (m + M)/ a]} x (180/) (36526/T) (3600) arc sec/century

Then ' = { [6.673 x 10- 11 x 2 x 1030]/ (58.2x109)]} (180/) (36526/88) (3600) = 43.0 arc sec per century Venus Advance of perihelion motion solution
With m = 4.868 x 10-6 M (0) and M = 1 M (0); G = 6.673 x 10- 11; a = 108.2 x 109 m And M (0) = 2 x 1030 kg; R (0) = 0.696 x 109 meters; T = 224.7 days

With ' = { [G (m + M)/ a]} x (180/) (36526/T) (3600) arc sec/century

Then ' = { [6.673 x 10- 11 x 2 x 1030]/ (108.2x109)]} (180/) (36526/88) (3600) = 9.0 arc sec per century
Page 10

These Arithmetic mistakes are the stupid things called experimental proofs of modern space - to imaginary time - back to space claims of modern physics coming out of the "magic sock" of University Professors physics. The 43 seconds of an arc per century is presented by "University" physicists proudly as the first experimental proof of time travel taught by Nobel Prize winners to their PHD's students in four years! This data transfer problem has a formula Real time = Event time + time delays The mistake is Real time = Event time The difference is time delays and all of modern physics is an attempt to explain this time delay in this equation Real time = Event time + time delays The make - believe relativity theory came to explain the time delays puzzles through making up stuff like space - to imaginary time - back to space Hollywood studios make - believe time travel physics. Quantum mechanics came to explain the visual illusion seen in the lab one time you find things in event time and one time you find things in real time and you dig your face again? What? Building modern physics on space- to imaginary time made physics a stupidity taught in classrooms and used in scientific calculations. I am not saying that modern physics is stupid but what I am saying is that I can prove modern stupid to say the least. Time travel is not physics and when time travel came to classrooms physicists became as good as gypsy fortune tellers and all the Nobel Prizes that was won based on space time physics I can prove it as wrong physics and wrong physics is space -time confusion of physics because it is all a made out visual illusions and nothing more than PHD idiots and Nobel PHD Idiots taking time dependent measurements wrong for 350 years and bullying humanity for funds. Space - Time continuum is not physics because I can prove it as visual illusion and a visual illusion only. It is time for change; regime change. Page 11

It is not just about 110 years of Nobel Prize winner wrong physics but it is about 400 years of bullying physicists. Real time: We can not see or measure something that did not happen. We can only see and measure something that had happened. What we measure in not what happened. We measure in present time an event that happened in past time. That is we measure past events in present time Present time = present time Present time = past time + [present time - past time] Present time = past time + relativistic time delays Real time = event time + real time relativistic delays Real time physics = event time physics + real time relativistic delays physics What one sees is relativistic = what happened in an absolute event + relativistic delays What happened in an event is absolute = real time physics - real time relativistic effects. Observer time = traveller time + time delays Real time = absolute time + time delays Real time = Event time + time delays = t + ( - t) Real time = Event time + time delays = t + (x) + (y) = t (/t) =t

; /t =

; t = arc tan (v/c)

= t [cosine t + sine t] = (x) + (y) = t cosine t + t sine t (x) = t cosine t = t {1 - 2 sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]} (x) = (x) - t = - 2 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] (x) = - 2 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] (y) = sine t = sine arc tan (v/c) This is time delays and this formula explain modern physics as stupidity itself (x) = - 2 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] Page 12

This high school math formula (x) = - 2 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] Is the greatest one mistake physicists make every day and it is the one formula that has to be accounted for in every day physics work and in every time, time dependent measurements are made and every time signals and not measuring tape is used as means of measurements. This one mistake is the mother of all mistakes in human history of science and it is as old as physics itself. This one mistake not new and it goes back to the start of science because light had been studied for all of past centuries and this one mistake is a rule of nature and a mistake that never been accounted for and outlasted all physicists of past centuries and it is one that nature has and was missed and in the process creepy physics called Modern physics called relativistic quantum mechanics and all physics that was based on relativistic quantum mechanics and was made to explain the consequences of this one mistake when this one mistake is a beautiful and a simple rule of nature. For example, this equation explains the first experimental proof of space time travel and the first experimental of experimental proof general relativity theory dearest to Einstein applied to planet mercury. (x) = - 2 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] Where t = 100 years = 100 x 23.9345 x 3600 seconds (x) = - 2 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] (100 x 23.9345 x 3600) And using the 1/2 cycle measurements (x) /2 = - t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] seconds And v = v (m) [Mercury] - v (e) [Earth] = 47.9 km/sec - 29.8 km/sec = 18.1 km/sec Or W" = (15/2) (x) = (7.5) t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] arc seconds W" = 7.5 x 100 x 23.9345 x 3600 x sine [(1/2) arc tan (18.1/300,000)] = 43.0" arc seconds per 100 years (x) = - 2 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] in seconds Page 13

A century t = 100 (years) x 365.26 (days) x 24 (hours) x 3600 (seconds) In second per century (x) = - 2 sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] (100 x 24 x 365.26 x 24 x 3600) In arc second per century (x) = - 30 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] (100 x 24 x 365.26 x 24 x 3600) In arc per century using cycle (x) = - 15 sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] (100 x 24 x 365.26 x 24 x 3600) And v = v (mercury) [v* (Orbital speed of Earth) - v (Spin speed of Earth)] For Mercury v (Mercury) = 47.9 km/sec (orbit) And [v* (Orbital speed of Earth) - v (Spin speed of Earth)] = 29.8 0.465 Or, [v* (Orbital speed of Earth) - v (Spin speed of Earth)] = 29.335 km/sec And v = 47.9 29.335 = 18.435 km/sec With c = 300,000 km/sec (x) = - 15 sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] (100 x 24 x 365.26 x 24 x 3600) (x) = - 15 sine [(1/2) arc tan (18.435/300,000)] x (100 x 24 x 365.26 x 24 x 3600) = 43.0 arc sec per century For Venus v (Mercury) = 35.1 km/sec And [v* (Orbital speed of Earth) - v (Spin speed of Earth)] = 29.8 - 0.465 Or, [v* (Orbital speed of Earth) - v (Spin speed of Earth)] = 29.335 km/sec And v = 35.1 29.335 = 5.765 km/sec With c = 300,000 km/sec (x) = - 15 sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] (100 x 24 x 365.26 x 24 x 3600) (x) = - 15 sine [(1/2) arc tan (5.765 /300,000)] x (100 x 24 x 365.26 x 24 x 3600) = 4.37 arc sec per century Using full cycle (x) = - 2 x 15 sine [(1/2) arc tan (5.765 /300,000)] x (100 x 24 x 365.26 x 24 x 3600) = 8.74 arc sec per century Page 14

It published literature both numbers, 4.37 arc sec per century for cycle and 8.74 arc sec per century for full cycle are given without an explanation

= (x) + (y) = t e

(x) = t cosine arc tan (v/c) = t {1- 2 sine {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}} (x) - t = 2 t sine {[arc tan (v/c)]/2} Astronomers use 1/2 cycle Then ( - t)/2 = - t sine {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}; If v << c Then ( - t)/2 = - (t /4) (v/c) seconds per 100 years in 1/2 cycles And ( - t)/2 = - 15 (t /4) (v/c) arc seconds per 100 years in 1/2 cycle = 3.75 t (v/c) arc seconds per 100 years in 1/2 cycle When we measure the orbit of planet Mercury we use v = velocity of mercury - velocity of earth = 47.9 km - 29.8 km = 18.1 km; v = 300,000 km/sec If t = 100 years that would be = 100 x 365.26 days x 24 hours x 60 minute x 60 seconds Then t = 36526 x 24 x 3600 seconds in 100 years In a circle for every 24 hours x 3600 seconds there is = 360 degrees x 3600 seconds Or, for every one 1 time second = 15 arc second And ( - t)/2 = 3.75 t (v/c) For Mercury: ( - t)/2 = - 3.75 x [36526 x 24 x 3600] x (18.1/300,000) = - 43.0 arc sec per century For a full cycle: it is 86 Arc seconds per century. For Venus Velocity instead of Earth's Velocity That is: 35.1[Venus orbital speed] [29.8 0.465] = 5.765 km/sec Half - ( - t)/2 = - 3.75 x [36526 x 24 x 3600] x (5.765 /300,000) = -4.37 Of arc sec per century Full ( - t) = - 2 x 3.75 x [36526 x 24 x 3600] x (5.765/300,000) = 8.74 arc sec per century

( - t)/2 = 3.75 t (v/c)

Page 15

Visual Illusions deceptions are modern physics. Visual effects are very deceptive but not for lucid physics and physicists and to know that most of Modern Physics is made out of visual Illusion make it problematic and telling it 400 years of physics and 400,000 physicists make people walk away to say the least not only because they would be skeptical but it is frightening to them spending their entire life on playing science in the dark and suddenly there was light and in clear visions and all there is and was is Nobel stupidity. Such shocks I gave during long years to PHD physicists and "university" professors and researchers made me the one and lonely greatest physicist of all time and both fingers raised. The thing about modern physics is that it I can proven that most of modern physics is made out of visual deceptions and Modern physics and physicists of relativity and quantum mechanics and other theories came out as an attempt to explain these visual deceptions and most of quantum relativistic physics and all sciences based on quantum relativistic are mostly a make believe made up world of science. Taking visual effects as real and calling it modern physics and give it Nobel prizes does not make it real physics. For almost forty years of my nightmare not because I can not prove that modern Physics is mostly made out of visual deceptions but it is because I can prove it a visual deception and every time I proved that Modern Physics is made out of visual deceptions I give people shocks they did not want or wanted to believe that they spent their entire professional life with a moron halo above their heads. I can prove that most of modern physics lab work is made out of visual illusion and I am writing this book to change modern physics and the stupid history of modern Physics. Wrong arithmetic and fortune hunters who pushed wrong arithmetic led to modern physics that people call science and that made science a fiction and this one real time formula Real time Mechanics = Event time Mechanics + time delay Mechanics This one formula uncovers 110 years of Nobel Prize winner physics as wrong arithmetic and 400 years of physics as wrong physics. Page 16

Real time Mechanics = Event time Mechanics + time delay Mechanics Wrong physics is Real time Mechanics = Event time Mechanics This 400 years mistake can be found in every physics law

Kepler's speed laws told us about this mistake

Or, r (1) ' (1) = r (2) '(2) = location x speed = constant = Areal velocity Or, ' (1) = {[r (2)/ r (1)]} ' (2) And ' (1) - ' (2) = {{[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} ' (2) ' = {{[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} ' (2) This is the angular time delay and will be seen as angular visual Illusion The angular speed is ' = v/r For Mercury: ' = v/r = (47.9km/sec)/58,200,000 km = 0.000000843 radians/sec If you want the accumulation value in arc sec /century W", then And W" = (v/r) (180/) (3600) (26526/T) = angular velocity in arc sec per century If it is measured for planet Mercury then W" = (47.9/58,200,000) (180/) (3600) (26526/88) W"= 70.29 arc second per century Or, W" = {{[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} W" (2) What is the angular visual Illusion for planet Mercury that would be seen when measured from Earth with Earth location r (1) = Earth = 149.6 x 106 And r (2) = Mercury = 58.2 x 106 And W" (2) = - 70.29 arc sec /century W" = {{[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} W" (2) W" = {{ [149.6/ 58.2]} - 1} [-70.29] = 43.0" arc per century Page 17

Planet Mercury Venus Earth Mars Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune Pluto

Distance r X 106km 58.2 108.2 149.6 227.936 778.412 1,426.725 2,870.97 4,498 5906.4

Planet Orbit T 88 224.7 365.26 687 4333 10760 30690 60180 90730

Orbit speed Less v in km/sec Earth speed 47.9 18.1 35.05 5.7 29.8 24.14 13.06 9.65 6.80 5.43 4.74

Spin speed km/sec .002 6.52 .46511 0.2411 12.6 9.87 2.59 2.68

Angular velocity; v/r arc sec/ century 70.29 10.86 4.1

For Planet Venus What is the angular visual Illusion for planet Mercury that would be seen when measured from Earth with Earth location r (1) = Earth = 149.6 x 106 The angular speed is ' = v/r For Venus: ' = v/r = (35.1km/sec)/108,200,000 km = 0.000000324 radians/sec If you want the accumulation value in arc sec /century W", then And W" = (v/r) (180/) (3600) (26526/T) = angular velocity in arc sec per century If it is measured for planet Venus then W" = (35.1/108,200,000) (180/) (3600) (26526/88) W"= - 10.87687234 arc second per century Or, W" = {{[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} W" (2) What is the angular visual Illusion for planet Venus that would be seen when measured from Earth with Earth location r (1) = Earth = 149.6 x 106 And r (2) = Venus = 108.2x 106 And W" (2) = 10.87687234 arc sec /century W" = {{[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} W" (2) W" = {{ [149.6/108.2]} - 1} [-10.87687234] = 2 arc per century Page 18

Kepler's modified law told us about this mistake: T/a = 4 /GM To T/a = 4 /G (M + m) That is Kepler's measurements data are centered from the sun and Newton's data are centered at the center of mass and this would explain this mistake like this: T (1)/a = 4 /GM and T (2) /a = 4 /G (M + m) When Newton changed Kepler's equation he solved the advance of perihelion as shown: The advance of Mercury perihelion by Newton T (1) = T (2) [M/ (M + m)] And 2/ T (1) = [2 / T (2)] (1 + m/M) And ' (1) = ' (2) (1 + m/M) And ' (2) = ' (1) / [1 + (m/M)] [1 - m/ (2M)] This approximation was not on the original work And ' (2) - ' (1) = ' (1) [1 / [1 + (m/M)] - 1] And ' (2) - ' (1) - ' (1) (m/2M) = - [2 /T] [m/2M) = - m/MT radians/T W " (calculated) = [- m/MT] (180/ degrees) (3600 seconds) (36526 century); T = days With m = 0.32 x1024 kg And M = 2.0 x1030 kg T = 88 days W' (calculated) = (-180 x 36526 x 3600/T) (m/M) = 43.0" seconds of arc /100 years There are many more ways to get to prove that the 43 seconds of an arc of Planet Mercury axis tilt in 100 years is just an arithmetic mistake One of the ways that can be used to explain it is making up stuff like Einstein did and that is making up stuff. For example making up another gravitational force Page 19

Einstein added k/ r4 to Newton's - Kepler's Gravitational force laws F = - GmM/r Or, Newton's Kepler's equation: F = - GmM/r Became Einstein's Gravitational law to explain the 43 arc sec per century Or, F = - GmM/r + k/ r4; Einstein law Einstein has no proof of the existence of this extra force + k/ r4 He used and dwelled on the arithmetic mistake to claim that this is due to time travel This make - up physics or rigging made by Einstein is fraud Let us make - up a force and prove the same thing Einstein proved! How about a force of inverse cube law - k/r Let us use this make - up and beat Alfred Nobel Physicists Location r = r r (1) Velocity v = r' r (1) + r ' (1) Acceleration = (r" - r') r (1) + (2r'' + r ") (1) And S = m r; State = mass x distance P = d S/ d t = d (m r)/d t = m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) r Velocity = v = (d r/d t); mass rate change = m' = (d m/d t) P = m v + m' r; Momentum = change of state = change in location or change in mass F = d P/d t = d S/d t = d [m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t)]/d t = m d r/d t + (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) r F = m d r/d t + 2 (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) r Force = Change of momentum F = m a + 2 m ' v + m" r F = - GmM/r Or, Newton's Kepler's equation: F = - GmM/r Then With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r Newton's Gravitational Equation (1) And d (mr')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2) With m = constant, then m can be taken out from both equations (1) and (2) With d r/d t - r ' = - GM/r And d (r')/d t = 0 Newton's Gravitational Equation Kepler's force law Page 20 (1) (2)

Abstract: Inverse Cube equations F = m = - k/r r (1), then in polar coordinates With m [d r/dt - 'r] = - k /r Inverse Cube made - up Gravitational law (1) And d (r')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity Equation (2) These two equations give an axial rotation rate: One: = (m/ M) (180) [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years = 43.0344 seconds of arc / century for Mercury Two: ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) (1 - )/ T (1 - ) (v/c) arc second/100 years = 43.0" seconds of arc /century for Mercury

Solution:
All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product S = m r; State = mass x location: P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment = change of location + change of mass = m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate F = d P/d t = dS/dt = Total force = m (dr/dt) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (dm/dt) r = m + 2m'v +m" r; = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate In polar coordinates system r = r r (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r ' (1) ; = (r" - r')r(1) + (2r'' + r ")(1) r = location; v = velocity; = acceleration F = m + 2m'v +m" r F = m [(r"-r') r (1) + (2r'' + r ") (1)] + 2m'[r' r (1) + r ' (1)] + (m" r) r (1) = [d (m r)/dt - (m r) '] r (1) + (1/mr) [d (mr')/d t] (1) = [-GmM/r] r (1) ------------------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law Proof: First r = r [cosine + sine ] = r r (1) Define r (1) = cosine + sine Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t = r' r (1) + r '[- sine + cosine ] = r' r (1) + r ' (1) Define (1) = -sine +cosine ; And with r (1) = cosine + sine Then d [ (1)]/d t= ' [- cosine - sine = - ' r (1) And d [r (1)]/d t = ' [-sine + cosine ] = ' (1) Page 21

Define = d [r' r (1) + r ' (1)] /d t = r" r (1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' ' r (1) + r " r (1) +r 'd [ (1)]/d t = (r" - r') r (1) + (2r'' + r ") (1) With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = - k/ r; Inverse Cube Gravitational Equation And d (mr')/d t = 0 Kepler's law With m = constant Then d r/dt - 'r = - k/ r And d (r')/d t = 0 (1) (2) (1) (2)

From (2) d (r')/d t = 0; r' = h From (1), ' d r/ d - 'r = - k/ mr And ' [d r/ d - r] = - k/ mr And d r/ d - r = - (k/mh) r And d r/ d - r [1 - (k/mh)] = 0 And r (, 0) = r (0, 0) Exp { [1 - (k/mh)]} From (2) d (r')/d t = 0; r' = h Then 2rr'' + r'' = 0 Dividing by r' We get 2 (r'/r) + (''/') = 0 And 2 (r'/r) = - ''/' = 2 t And r = r (0, 0) Exp { [1 - (k/mh)]} Exp t And ' = ' (, 0) Exp - 2 t Or r = r (0, 0) Exp [{ [1 - (k/mh)]} + t] And ' = ' (0, 0) Exp -2 [{ [1 - (k/mh)]} + t] And ' = ' (0, 0) Exp -2 [{ [1 - (k/h)]} + t] And ' = (' (0, 0) {cosine 2 [{ [1 - (k/h)]} + t] - sine 2 [{ [1 - (k/h)]} + t]} And ' - ' (0, 0) = - 2 ' (0, 0) sine [{ [1 - (k/mh)]} + t] And ' = - 2 ' (0, 0) sine [{ [1 - (k/mh)]} + t] If k = Gm M ; h = 2 a b/T Then ' = - 2 ' (0, 0)] sine [{ [1 - (GMT/4ab)]} + t] Taking Kepler's: T/4a = 1/GM = 1/G M And GM = 4a/ T; GM T = 4a And (GMT/4ab) = a /b Then ' = - 2 ' (0, 0) sine [{ (1 - a /b)} + t] If = mb/aM Page 22

Then ' = - 2 ' (0, 0)] sine [{ [1 - (m/ M)]} + t] If = 0 Then ' = - 2 ' (0, 0) sine t And ' (0, 0) = h/r = 2ab/Ta (1 - ) = 2a (1 - )/Ta (1 - ) = 2 (1 - )/T (1 - ) And ' = - 4 (1 - )/ T (1 - ) sine t With T = arc tan v/c << 1 Then ' = - 4 (1 - )/ T (1 - ) sine arc tan (v/c) radians per T Or ' = - 4 (1 - )/ T (1 - ) (v/c) radians per T And ' = - 4 (1 - )/ T (1 - ) (v/c) [180/] [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years Or ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) [ (1 - )]/ T (1 - ) (v/c) arc second/100 years Or ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) (1.552) (48.2/c) = 43.11 " arc second/100 years Or If = 0 Then ' = - 2 ' (0, 0)] sine { [1 - (m/ M)]} And (m/ M) << 1 Then ' = - 2 ' (0, 0) sine If = arc tan (v/c) Then ' = - 2 ' (0, 0) sine arc tan (v/c) With ' (0, 0) = 2 (1 - )/T (1 - ) Then ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) (1 - )/ T (1 - ) (v/c) arc second/100 years Or r = r (0, 0) Exp [{ [1 - (k/mh)]} + t] Or r = r (0, 0) Exp [{ [1 - (m/M)]} + t] If m/ M << 1 Then r r (0, 0) Exp [{[1 - (m/ 2M)]} + t] And r r (0, 0) Exp [( - ) + t] With = m/ 2M Taking = 2 Then = m/ M radians And = m/ (M) [180/] [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years Or = (m/ M) (180) [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years = 43.0344"/100 years Or ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) (1 - )/ T (1 - ) (v/c) arc second/100 years = 43.0"/100 years Page 23

Or and extra Newton's = m/ (m+ M) [180/] [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years Either one of the three formulas works and gives 43 seconds of an arc for planet Mercury.

Let me make another make - up force and let us make it nuclear force Nuclear Gravity (-GmM/r) Exp (m /M r): One stone two birds
Vs Newton's Gravity (-GmM/r) And Vs Einstein's Gravity (-GmM/r) + k/ (r) Abstract: Nahhas' force (-GmM/r)Exp(m /M r) or the nuclear gravity force is the crudely approximated Newtonian gravity force (-GmM/r) explains planetary motion around the sun as a rotating ellipse with a rotation rate = [ m/(m + M)](180/)(36526/T)(3600) = 43.03 seconds of an arc per century for the most talked about planet of mercury; m = 3.2 x 10^24 kg; M = 2x10^30 kg; T = 88days For 400 years and a million Physicists Astrophysicists Mathematicians Engineers and all others solved the Newton's-Kepler's Equations wrong With d (m r)/dt (m r) ' = -GmM/r Newton's Gravity Force (1) And d (Wimr')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity (2) With a solution: r = [a (1 )/(1 + cosine )] Newton's Equation solution And ' = h/r Kepler's Equation Solution The correct solution: Nahhas' solution: r(, t) = [a(1 )/(1 + cosine )] Exp [ (r) + (r)] t And rotation rate of W (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) ]} [(v + v*)/c] degrees/100 years T = period; = eccentricity; v = spin velocity effect; v*= orbital velocity effect In general v* = v* (p) + v*(s) and v = v (p) + v (s); p = primary; s= secondary And v* + v = 48.2 km/sec; = 0.206; T = 88 days; c = 300,000 km/sec W (ob) = 43.11''/century; W (observed) = 43.11'' The new correct solution contains Newton's-Kepler's particle mechanics and Quantum wave mechanics in one equation and Einstein's relativity deleted. However; planetary motion and its most talked about planet orbit of mercury's rotating ellipse and its rate of advance of perihelion can be explained as a nuclear gravitation force and not as a Newton's gravitational force or Einstein's space-time confusion of force or any other force and this new gravitation equation is: With d (m r)/dt (m r) ' = [-GmM/r]Exp(m / M r) Nuclear gravity Equation (1) And (mr')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity (2) Solution: All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product S = m r; State = mass x location: Page 24

P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment = change of location + change of mass = m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate F = d P/d t = dS/dt = Total force = m (dr/dt) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (dm/dt) r = m + 2m'v +m" r; = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate In polar coordinates system r = r r (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r ' (1) ; = (r" - r')r(1) + (2r'' + r ")(1) r = location; v = velocity; = acceleration F = m + 2m'v +m" r F = m [(r"-r') r (1) + (2r'' + r ") (1)] + 2m'[r' r (1) + r ' (1)] + (m" r) r (1) = [d (m r)/dt - (m r) '] r (1) + (1/mr) [d (mr')/d t] (1) = [-GmM/r] r (1) ------------------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law Proof: First r = r [cosine + sine ] = r r (1) Define r (1) = cosine + sine Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t = r' r (1) + r '[- sine + cosine ] = r' r (1) + r ' (1) Define (1) = -sine +cosine ; And with r (1) = cosine + sine Then d [ (1)]/d t= ' [- cosine - sine = - ' r (1) And d [r (1)]/d t = ' [-sine + cosine ] = ' (1) Define = d [r' r (1) + r ' (1)] /d t = r" r (1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' ' r (1) + r " r (1) +r 'd [ (1)]/d t = (r" - r') r (1) + (2r'' + r ") (1) With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r Newton's Gravitational Equation And d (mr')/d t = 0 Central force law (2): d (mr')/d t = 0 Then mr' = constant; if m is taken as constant then r' = h And (1): d r/dt - r ' = -GmM/r Let m r =1/u Then d r/d t = -u'/u = - (1/u) (') d u/d = (- '/u) d u/d = - h d u/d And d r/dt = -h'du/d = - hu [du/d] Page 25 (1) (2)

With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r Nuclear Gravity And d (mr')/d t = 0 Central force law

(1) (2)

-hu [du/d] - (1/u) (hu) = -GMu [1 ( m/M) u]; m/M r << 1 Or (du/ d) + (1 Gm/h) u = GM/h And u = [GM/ h]/ [1 Gm/h] + A cosine { [1 - Gm/h]} And r = 1/u = 1/ {[GM/ h]/ [1 Gm/h] + A cosine { [1 Gm/h]} } = [1 Gm/h]/M/ h]/ {1 + cosine { [1 - Gm/h]} Where [1 Gm/h]/GM/h = a (1 ) And [1 Gm/h] = (GM/h) a (1-) If = a (1 ), the h = G (m + M) a (1- ) Then Gm/h = G m a (1 - ) /G (m + M) a (1- ) = m (m + M) With r (, 0) = [1 Gm/h]/M/ h]/ {1 + cosine { [1 Gm/h]} Then r (, 0) = a (1 )/ {1 + cosine { [1 Gm/h]} And r (, 0) = a (1 )/ {1 + cosine { [1 m/ (m + M)]} And m << M; [1 m/ (m + M)] 1 - m/2(m + M) With { [1 Gm/h]} [1 - m/ 2(m + M)] If = 2, Then 2 [1- m/2(m + M)] = 2 - 2 [m/2(m + M)] With r(,0) = a(1 )/{1 + cosine [ m/2(m + M)]} Then r(,0) = a(1 )/[1 + cosine ( )] And = m/2(m + M) With = 2, then = 2m/2(m + M) = m/ (m + M) radians/second Multiplication by 180/, then = 180m/ (m + M) degrees/second Multiplication by (36526/T), then = [m/ (m + M)] (180)(36526/T) degrees/century Multiplication by 3600, then = [m/ (m + M)] (180)(36526/T)(3600) seconds/century With Planet Mercury: m = 3.2x10^24kg; M = 2x10^30kg Then = [3.2x10^24/2x10^30](180)(36526/T)(3600) seconds of an arc per century And = 43.03426909''/century Planet Mercury 43" seconds of arc per century elliptical orbit axial rotation rate Einstein has a similar equation With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r + k/ (r) Einstein's Space-time (1) And d (mr')/d t = 0 Central force law (2) Page 26

With r (, 0) = a (1 )/[1 + cosine ( )] And = [6GM/ac (1 )] radians/second x (180/) (36526/T)(3600) = 43.03'' Newton's force -GmM/r if corrected to [ GmM/r] Exp (m /M r) gives exact solution without make-believe 20th century confusion of physics unless you have been to time travel buss station of a 1956 live Elvis show! Then I will bow Then (Venus) = [43.03''] [T/2T (Venus)] = 8.426826168'' And (Earth) = [43.03''] [T/2T (Earth)] = 5.184'' The advance of perihelion of Venus and Earth never been measured but badly approximated and deduced and the reason for that is the very small value and Venus looks like a star and not a planet. For centuries Astronomers are yet to have reliable data of Venus like its rotation velocity. In recent years astronomers gave 6.5 km/sec for its rotational speed from its light spectrum; however, V= 2r/p; r = Venus radius and p = Venus rotational period comes to few meters per seconds and not few kilometers per second indicating 400 years of astronomy that claims to know how the Universe was born and how it will end when the have no clue the speed of a planet that can been seen 24/7 from satellites. Einstein equation is With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r + k/ (r) Einstein's Space-time And d (mr')/d t = 0 Central force law With r (, 0) = a (1 )/ [1 + cosine ( )] And = [6GM/ac (1 )] radians/second x (180/) (36526/T) (3600) = 43.03'' There is nothing unique about it It is a made up physics It works on plant Mercury It does not work anywhere else In 1959 there was an article in science magazine that said if Relativity is to be tested properly then it should be applied to binary stars or two stars systems. Relativity theory failed the test with two star systems and this equation failed and it failed it very bad and yes this formula: Or, = [6GM/ac (1 )] radians/second x (180/) (36526/T) (3600) = 43.03'' (1) (2)

Does not work anywhere else

Page 27

Why Nobel Prize winners insist on teaching this formula and teaching relativity theory when Einstein's relativity theory is proven wrong is a signature of the scientific character: Nobel Prize winner physicists are representative of the big institutions Mafia and a Nobel prize winner physicist will say anything publish anything based on nothing for jobs money prestige and a cut in the hundreds of millions of dollars the institution that backed him up and received massive funding for their research boats dogs and mistresses. We went to the Lab and In the Lab the force between two balls was measured: F = -GmM/r And Newton F = m And got this equation Then he solved his equation like this Location r = r r (1) Velocity v = r' r (1) + r ' (1) Acceleration = (r" - r') r (1) + (2r'' + r ") (1) And S = m r; State = mass x distance P = d S/ d t = d (m r)/d t = m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) r Velocity = v = (d r/d t); mass rate change = m' = (d m/d t) P = m v + m' r; Momentum = change of state = change in location or change in mass F = d P/d t = d S/d t = d [m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t)]/d t = m d r/d t + (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) r F = m d r/d t + 2 (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) r Force = Change of momentum F = m a + 2 m ' v + m" r F = - GmM/r Or, Newton's Kepler's equation: F = - GmM/r Then With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r Newton's Gravitational Equation And d (mr')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law With m = constant, then m can be taken out from both equations (1) and (2) With d r/d t - r ' = - GM/r And d (r')/d t = 0 Newton's Gravitational Equation Kepler's force law (1) (2) (1) (2)

Page 28

From 2: With m = constant; then d (mr')/d t = 0 And m d (r')/d t = 0 And d (r')/d t = 0 And r' = h With (1): d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r With m = constant Then m [d r/ d t - r '] = - Gm M/ r And [d r/ d t - r '] = - G M/ r Let r =1/u Then d r/d t = -u'/u = - (1/u) (') d u/d = (- '/u) d u/d = - h d u/d And d r /d t = - h 'du/d = - h u [du/d] And - h u [du/d] - (1/u) (hu) = - G Mu Or, [du/ d] + u = G M/ h u = G M/ h + A cosine And r = 1/u = 1/ [G M / h + A cosine ] = (h/ G M)/ [1 + (Ah/ GM) cosine ] = (h/GM)/ (1 + cosine ) Then r (, 0) = a (1-)/ (1+ cosine ) This is Newton's Classical Equation solution of two body problem. We solved this equation and we got the motion equation: r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )] Which is the equation of an ellipse with eccentricity and semi - major axis a, and a semi- minor axis b = a [1 - ] and two foci one equals to c = a, and the other foci location equals to - c = - a. Or the motion of one ball around the other ball should be an ellipse with the other ball at one of the foci +/- a, of the ellipse with semi major axes (- a, a) on x-axis and semi minor axes (-b, b) on y- axis and foci (- c, c) on x- axis again with angle of rotation . If this law to work on two planets instead of two balls like planetary motion around the sun, then Astronomers should see this motion of a planet moving around the sun in an ellipse with the sun at one of its foci. When astronomers turned their telescopes to confirm the force law F = -GmM/r and see if planetary motion around the Sun abide by this law and attempt to see a planet moves in an ellipse around the sun with the sun at one of the foci of that ellipse, they saw an ellipse with rotating axes instead. Solution of -GmM/r: r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )] they did not see this But instead they saw this [ + (r)] t That is they saw r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+cos)] (r) This is the equation of an ellipse with rotating axes. Page 29

The difference is /t And (r) = 0

= [ (r) + (r)] t

Are Newton's - Kepler's laws wrong?

Einstein and 110 years of Nobel Prize winner physicists said Hell Ya they are wrong Relativity theory in its entirety said Newton's - Kepler's laws are wrong Quantum mechanics Physicists had been saying Newton's - Kepler's laws are wrong Strings morons brag about their stupidity and say Newton's - Kepler's laws are wrong

Modern Physics is based on Newton's - Kepler's laws are wrong

100,000 PHD living physicists said Newton's laws are wrong 100,000 PHD dead physicists said Newton's laws are wrong 100,000 PHD Physicists web pages said Newton's laws are wrong Modern physicists brag about the assumption that Newton's equations were wrong and that relativity theory and quantum mechanics and other theories are needed to explain new experimental results Now who is wrong the experimenter in the Lab who measured F = -GmM/r Or, Einstein is wrong? And Einstein added k/r4 And made F = -GmM/r + k/r4 And made new equations and deleted Newton's equation With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r + k/r4; Einstein's Gravitational Equation And d (mr')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law And the New solution became: r (, t) = a (1-)/ [(1+ cosine ( - w)] Where w" = [6GM/ Ta (1- )] (180/) (36526) (3600) arc-sec/century G = 6.673 x 10- 11; a = 58.2 x 109 m M = 2 x 1030 kg And T = 88 days for planet Mercury to give Where w" = [6GM/ Ta (1- )] (180/) (36526) (3600) arc-sec/century = 43.0" arc sec/century And this was experimentally correct? The world sided with Einstein because the theory fits with the experiment When Einstein formulas were used on binary stars motion it failed! Page 30 (1) (2)

Binary stars is a two stars system and should behave like a planet and a sun or one star moving around the other star in the same manner a planet moves around the Sun Why Physicists and Astrophysicists insist on Einstein's formula when there is dozens of documented cases where Einstein's formulas fail? Scientists added rotational distortions term to rescue relativity theory and quantum mechanics because both are based on space time stupidity beside + k/r4 term to come closer to experimental results and for every hit it missed a thousand times. It is not only Einstein is

wrong but all physicists and astrophysicists are yet to know how to use a telescope!
There is nothing wrong with the experimenter in the Lab or F = -GmM/r And there is nothing wrong with Newton's - Kepler's equations

These equations are correct

With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r Newton's Gravitational Equation And d (mr')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law What is wrong is Modern space - time confusion of Physics Real time = Event time + time delays The old solution is an event time orbit solution Or, r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )] [ + (r)] t The real time orbit solution is: r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+cos)] (r) The difference between the two solutions is time delays visual effects that explains planet Mercury's motion or any motion for that matter correctly every time without space - time relativistic confusions or stupidity physics "Apparent advance of perihelion is given by this formula" Their real time orbit produces an angular visual effect of: W" (cal) = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } [(v+ v*)/c] arc seconds/100 years With v* = Mercury's velocity = 47.9 km/sec And v = Mercury's spin velocity of 3m/sec And c = light velocity of 300,000 km/sec And = 0.206 And (1-)/ (1-) = 1.552 And v+ v* = 47.9 km/sec + 3km/sec = 47.9 km/sec Page 31 (1) (2)

Giving an angular rotation rate of W" = 43.0" This formula W" (cal) = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } [(v+ v*)/c] arc seconds/100 years W" (cal) = (-720x36526x3600/88) (1.552) (47.9/300,000) arc seconds/100 years = 43.0" arc sec /century Said that Physicists are idiots and Astro physicists have no clue how to use the telescope. Why? Because it works on every planetary system or satellite system without any exception For 350 years Newton's - Kepler's equations were solved wrong. For 350 years Newton's - Kepler's equations were solved in event time I have had known about this for almost four decades 100,000 PHD living physicists are wrong 100,000 PHD dead physicists are wrong 100,000 PHD Physicists web pages are wrong

Newtons Keplers equations were solved wrong for 350 years The correct solution of Newtons Keplers equations is real time Universal Mechanics that wipes out 350 years of wrong physics and 400,000 physicists stupidity along with it Newton's Kepler's solution in real time
Real time two body problem
In Polar coordinates With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r Newton's Gravitational Equation And d (mr')/d t = 0 Central force law (2): d (mr')/d t = 0 Then mr' = constant = H (0, 0) = m (0, 0) h (0, 0); h (0, 0) = r (0, 0) '(0, 0) = m (0, 0) r (0, 0) '(0, 0); h (, 0) = [r (, 0)] ['(, 0)] = [m (, 0)] h (, 0); h (, 0) = [r (, 0)] ['(, 0)] = [m (, 0)] [r (, 0)] ['(, 0)] = [m (, t)] [r (, t)] [' (, t)] = [m(, 0) m(0,t)][ r(,0)r(0,t)]['(, t)] = [m(, 0) m(0,t)][ r(,0)r(0,t)]['(, 0) ' (0, t)] Page 32 (1) (2)

With mr' = constant Differentiate with respect to time Then 2mm'r' + 2mrr'' + mr" = 0 Divide by mr' Then 2 (m'/m) + 2(r'/r) + "/' = 0 This equation will have a solution 2 (m'/m) = 2[ (m) + (m)] And 2(r'/r) = 2[ (r) + (r)] And "/' = -2{ (m) + (r) + [ (m) + (r)]} Then (m'/m) = [ (m) + (m)] Or d m/m d t = [ (m) + (m)] And dm/m = [ (m) + (m)] d t Then m = m (0) Exp [ (m) + (m)] t m = m (0) m (0, t); m (0, t) Exp [ (m) + (m)] t With initial spatial condition that can be taken at t = 0 anywhere then m (0) = m (, 0) And m = m (, 0) m (0, t) = m (, 0) Exp [ (m) + (m)] t; Exp = Exponential And m (0, t) = Exp [ (m) + (m)] t Similarly we can get Also, r = r (, 0) r (0, t) = r (, 0) Exp [ (r) + (r)] t With r (0, t) = Exp [ (r) + (r)] t Then '(, t) = {H(0, 0)/[m(,0) r(,0)]}Exp{-2{[(m) + (r)]t + [(m) + (r)]t}} -----I And '(, t) = ' (, 0)]} Exp {-2{[ (m) + (r)] t + [ (m) + (r)] t}} --------------------I And, '(, t) = ' (, 0) ' (0, t) And ' (0, t) = Exp {-2{[ (m) + (r)] t + [ (m) + (r)] t} Also '(, 0) = H (0, 0)/ m (, 0) r (, 0) And '(0, 0) = {H (0, 0)/ [m (0, 0) r (0, 0)]} With (1): d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r = -GmM/mr And d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -Gm (, 0) m (0, t) M/ (mr) Let m r =1/u Then d (m r)/d t = -u'/u = - (1/u) (') d u/d = (- '/u) d u/d = -H d u/d And d (m r)/dt = -H'du/d = - Hu [du/d] -Hu [du/d] - (1/u) (Hu) = -Gm (, 0) m (0, t) Mu [du/ d] + u = Gm (, 0) m (0, t) M/ H t = 0; m (0, 0) = 1 u = Gm (, 0) M/ H + A cosine =Gm (, 0) M (, 0)/ h (, 0) And m r = 1/u = 1/ [Gm (, 0) M (, 0)/ h (, 0) + A cosine ] = [h/ Gm (, 0) M (, 0)]/ {1 + [Ah/ Gm (, 0) M (, 0)] [cosine ]} = [h/Gm (, 0) M (, 0)]/ (1 + cosine ) Page 33

Then m (, 0) r (, 0) = [a (1-)/ (1+cos)] m (, 0) Dividing by m (, 0) Then r (, 0) = a (1-)/ (1+cos) This is Newton's Classical Equation solution of two body problem which is the equation of an ellipse of semi-major axis of length a and semi minor axis b = a (1 - ) and focus length c = a And m r = m (, t) r (, t) = m (, 0) m (0, t) r (, 0) r (0, t) Then, r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+cos)] {Exp [(r) + (r)] t} ---------------------------------- II This is Newton's time dependent equation that is missed for 350 years If (m) 0 fixed mass and (r) 0 fixed orbit; then Then r (, t) = r (, 0) r (0, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )] Exp i (r) t And m = m (, 0) Exp [i (m) t] = m (, 0) Exp (m) t We Have '(0, 0) = h (0, 0)/r (0, 0) = 2ab/ Ta (1-) = 2a [ (1-)]/T a (1-) = 2 [ (1-)]/T (1-) Then '(0, t) = {2 [ (1-)]/ T (1-) } Exp {-2[ (m) + (r)] t = {2 [ (1-)]/ (1-) } {cosine 2[ (m) + (r)] t - sin 2[ (m) + (r)] t} And '(0, t) = '(0, 0) {1- 2sin [ (m) + (r)] t} - 2i '(0, 0) sin [ (m) + (r)] t cosine [ (m) + (r)] t Then '(0, t) = '(0, 0) {1 - 2sine [ (m) t + (r) t]} - 2 '(0, 0) sin [ (m) + (r)] t cosine [ (m) + (r)] t ' (0, t) = Real ' (0, t) + Imaginary (0, t) Real (0, t) = '(0, 0) {1 - 2 sine [ (m) t (r) t]} Let W (calculated) = ' (0, t) (observed) = Real (0, t) - '(0, 0) = -2'(0, 0) sine [ (m) t + (r) t] = -2[2 [ (1-)]/T (1-) ] sine [ (m) t + (r) t] W (Cal) = -4 {[ (1-)]/T (1-) ]} sine [ (m) t + (r) t] If this apsidal motion is to be found as visual effects, then With, v = spin velocity; v* = orbital velocity; v/c = tan (m) T; v*/c = tan (r) T* Where T = spin period; T* = orbital period And (m) T = Inverse tan v/c; (r) T*= Inverse tan v*/c W (ob) = -4 [ (1-)]/T (1-) ] sine [Inverse tan v/c + Inverse tan v*/c] radians Multiplication by 180/ Page 34

W (ob) = (-720/T) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } sine {Inverse tan [v/c + v*/c]/ [1 - v v*/c]} degrees and multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days W (ob) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } x sine {Inverse tan [v/c + v*/c]/ [1 - v v*/c]} degrees/100 years Approximations I With v << c and v* << c, then v v* <<< c and [1 - v v*/c] 1 Then W (ob) (-720x36526/Tdays) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } x sine Inverse tan [v/c + v*/c] degrees/100 years Approximations II With v << c and v* << c, then sine Inverse tan [v/c + v*/c] (v + v*)/c W (Cal) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } x [(v + v*)/c] degrees/100 years In arc second per century W" (Cal-arc sec) = (-720x36526x3600/Tdays) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } x [(v + v*)/c] In Time seconds W" (Cal- sec) = (-720x36526x3600/15Tdays) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } x [(v + v*)/c] Applied to Mercury's Perihelion Their real time orbit produces an angular visual effect of: W" (cal) = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } [(v+ v*)/c] arc seconds/100 years With v* = Mercury's velocity = 47.9 km/sec And v = Mercury's spin velocity of 3m/sec And c = light velocity of 300,000 km/sec And = 0.206 And (1-)/ (1-) = 1.552 And v+ v* = 47.9 km/sec + 3km/sec = 47.9 km/sec Giving an angular rotation rate of W" = 43.0" This formula W" (cal) = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } [(v+ v*)/c] arc seconds/100 years W" (cal) = (-720x36526x3600/88) (1.552) (47.9/300,000) arc seconds/100 years = 43.0" arc sec /century Page 35

These equations are correct

With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r Newton's Gravitational Equation And d (mr')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law What is wrong is Modern space - time confusion of Physics Real time = Event time + time delays The old solution is an event time orbit solution Or, r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )] (1) (2)

Nahhas' Equations: r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+cos)] [ (r) + (r)] t

W" (cal) = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } [(v+ v*)/c] arc seconds/100 years Did Newton's need this solution to determine the advance of perihelion of Planet mercury? With d r/d t - r ' = - GM/r And d (r')/d t = 0 Newton's Gravitational Equation Kepler's force law (1) (2)

Hell NO: In his days the telescopes were very small and the advance of perihelion was not an issue
At Perihelion: d r/d t - r ' = - GM/r = - r '; d r/d t = 0 Then r ' = GM/r A quick answer by Newton would be And First ' = [GM/r] Kepler's findings Frames are related by the quotient of their velocities = arc tan (v m/ v n) and the advance of perihelion is the opposite of the Michelson experiment or the quantity tan = (v m/ v n) = [(v* +/- v)/ (v**)] = Earth speed and spin/Mercury speed and spin Advance of perihelion Period is given by: Kepler's equation: = [GM/r] [(v* +/- v)/ (v**)] In arc sec / century Then = {[GM/r]} 1/2 {[(v* +/- v)/ (v**)]} 1/2 [(180/) (3600) (36526/T) = 43"/century G = gravitational constant M = sun mass r = Mercury - Sun distance Where v* = orbital speed of earth; v = spin speed of earth And v** = orbital speed of observed Planet Page 36

Is there any more? Then = {[G (m + M)/r]} 1/2 {[(v* +/- v)/ (v**)]} 1/2 [(180/) (3600) (36526/T)] One of the beautiful things I remember about old city of Beirut before the start of the civil war in June 1973 and exploded in April 1975 is the abundance of entertainment. Reading as a cheap entertainment was/is available to people of Lebanon where I was born and on Sundays during summer time the old Martyr square and surrounding areas side walks that changed to a flea market of used and new books and open publishing houses beside restaurants and movie theatres. There on the streets of old Beirut from 1968 - 1974 I walked through the greatest library I knew. Scientists are made in JR High. College is an opportunity to become one. On those summers I bought books and magazines in many subjects and in two languages that I can read write and speak that is English and Arabic. I started with Cartoon magazines then short stories then long stories then Lyrics of western music to novels or crafts to philosophy or science and everything that was there and I can afford and looked interesting. One of the books I bought was how to make a reel of cartoon movies. In summer of 1973 at age 15 I made a reel of the progress of light Points to see how this space - time in the frame work of Michelson and Morley experiment work and after few weeks and piles of drawings I realized the theory behind the experiment is fraud and could never work. I realized that the theory is in stationary time and what is measured is in real time proving my earlier finding which is if someone to measure others motion like measuring planets motion around the sun from earth and not from the sun then there will be errors from planets to earth and these were not being accounted for. Newton's equations should be wrong too because Newton did the same mistake. In summer of 1974 I figured that all of physics is wrong and Modern physics is stupidity itself. Abstract: Ending relativity from classrooms and scientific calculations starts with ending Nobel Prize winner Physicists wrong physics and it starts with the grand mistake called relativity theory. Relativity theory is based on the fact that light measurements are done along the line of sight and we measure light projections to our eye. Meaning, that we do not measure distance r but we measure r cosine arc tan (v/c) when light is used and as a consequence instead of measuring time T we measure T cosine arc tan (v/c) and here is the experimental proof of it. Page 37

Your eyes

A000 0 0000 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (2) 0 0 0 0 (1) 0 0 (3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B------------------------- 0 --------------- 0 ------------- 0 1 2 3 The projections of light is what we measure and the projection of 1 and 2 and 3 is AB If the angle between ray 1 and AB is (1) If the angle between ray 1 and AB is (2) If the angle between ray 1 and AB is (3)
Then C (1) cosine (1) = C (2) cosine (2) = C (3) cosine (3) = c = AB

You want experimental proof? Here is my iron clad proof of my theory: This is using the light projections to be equal c then the advance of perihelion and stars to solve mercury Venus and DI Herculis binary stars better than all is

If an object at location A sends light signals in all directions at time at t = 0 where B1 is; And B1 is moving to B2 then the projection of AB2 of AB1 is measured. AB1 is theorized and AB2 is measured; or AB2 = AB1 cosine ; = arc tan (v/c) B1B2 /AB1 = sine ; AB2/AB1 = cosine ; B1B2/AB2 = tan Instead of measuring time t we theorize time t and we measure time = t cosine

Page 38 A Light V O O O E O L O O O C O C I O T O Y O B2 O O O O O O O O O O B1 = t cosine arc tan (v/c) = t {1- 2 sine {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}} - t = 2 t sine {[arc tan (v/c)]/2} Astronomers use 1/2 cycle Then ( - t)/2 = - t sine {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}; If v << c Then ( - t)/2 = - (t /4) (v/c) seconds per 100 years in 1/2 cycles And ( - t)/2 = - 15 (t /4) (v/c) arc seconds per 100 years in 1/2 cycle = 3.75 t (v/c) arc seconds per 100 years in 1/2 cycle When we measure the orbit of planet Mercury we use v = velocity of mercury - velocity of earth = 47.9 km - 29.8 km = 18.1 km; v = 300,000 km/sec If t = 100 years that would be = 100 x 365.26 days x 24 hours x 60 minute x 60 seconds Then t = 36526 x 24 x 3600 seconds in 100 years In a circle for every 24 hours x 3600 seconds there is = 360 degrees x 3600 seconds Or, for every one 1 time second = 15 arc second And ( - t)/2 = 3.75 t (v/c) For Mercury: ( - t)/2 = - 3.75 x [36526 x 24 x 3600] x (18.1/300,000) = - 43.0 arc sec per century For a full cycle: it is 86 Arc seconds per century. For Venus Velocity instead of Earth's Velocity That is: 35.1[Venus orbital speed] + 6.52 [Venus spin speed] - 29.8 = 11.82 km/sec Half - ( - t)/2 = - 3.75 x [36526 x 24 x 3600] x (11.82/300,000) = 4.592821605 Of arc sec per century Full ( - t) = - 2 x 3.75 x [36526 x 24 x 3600] x (11.82/300,000) = 9.18654321 arc sec per century Page 39

O O O

V O O O O

1- Real time: We can not see or measure something that did not happen. We can only see and measure something that had happened. What we measure in not what happened. We measure in present time an event that happened in past time. That is we measure past events in present time Present time = present time Present time = past time + [present time - past time] Present time = past time + relativistic time delays Real time = event time + real time relativistic delays Real time physics = event time physics + real time relativistic delays physics What one sees is relativistic = what happened in an absolute event + relativistic delays What happened in an event is absolute = real time physics - real time relativistic effects. Observer time = traveller time + time delays Real time = absolute time + time delays Real time = Event time + time delays = t + ( - t) =t+ 2 - Real time location An object at of absolute location r when measured in real time a translational or decay factor of [ (r)] t and a rotation motion factor of [ (r)] t is introduced to a total factor of [ (r) + (r)]
t

Equation 1- a Equation 1- b

and the location of an object r when measured in real time it will measure as:
[ (r) + (r)] t

S=r

Equations 2

3 - A - Real time location along the line of measurement and B - Real time location Perpendicular to the line of measurement. S=r
[ (r) + (r)] t

=r

[ (r)] t

(r) t

S = S x+ S y= r

[ (r)] t

[cosine t + sine t]

Real time location along the line of measurement is [ ] t S x = r (r) cosine t S x= r

[ (r)] t

Equations 3- a

[1 - sine t]

Real time location perpendicular to the line of measurement is t S y = r [ (r)] sine t

Equations 3 - b

4 - Real time location in rectangular coordinates

Location r = x + y + z k

Page 40 Velocity v = (d x/d t) (d y/d t) + (d z/d t) k Acceleration = (dx/dt) (dy/dt) + (dz/dt) k S=r
[ (r) + (r)] t [ (r) + (r)] t

S = [x + y + z k]

Equations 4

5 - Real time location in Polar Coordinates Location r = r r (1) Velocity v = r' r (1) + r ' (1) Acceleration = (r" - r') r (1) + (2r'' + r ") (1) S = r r (1)
[ (r) + (r)] t

Equations 5

6 - Real time location in Cylindrical coordinates system Location r = (1) + z Velocity v = ' (1) + r ' (1) + z'; Acceleration = ( " - ') (1) + (2 '' + ") (1) + z'' S=r
[ (r) + (r)] t [ (r) + (r)] t

S = [ (1) + z]

Equations 6

7 - Real time location in Spherical coordinates system Location r = r [r, , ] = r r (1) Velocity v = r' r (1) + r ' sine (1) + r ' (1) Acceleration = [r" - r ('sine + ')] r (1) + [1/rsine ] [d (r ' sine )/d t] (1) + {(1/r) [d (r')/d t] - r ' sine cosine } (1) [ + (r)] t S = r r (1) (r) Equations 7 8 - Real time Velocity [ + (r)] t Let S = r (r) Then Velocity = P = d S /d t = {[(d r/ d t) + r [ (r) + (r)]} P = {[v + r [ (r) + (r)]}
[ (r) + (r)] t [ (r) + (r)] t

Equation 8

Page 41 9 - Real time Acceleration F = d P/ d t = d S/ d t [ + (r)] t F = { + 2 [ (r) + (r)] v - [ (r) + (r)] r} (r)

Equation 9

10 - A - Real time location rotational aberration along the line of measurement and B-Real time location rotational aberration perpendicular to the line of measurement Taking (r) t = arc tan (v/c); v = velocity; c = light or signal velocity Velocity v could be orbital, or, spin, or, orbital and spin and it is a perpendicular to the line of measurement velocity Along the line of measurement [ ] t Then S x = r (r) [1 - sine arc tan (v/c)] Equation 10 - a Perpendicular to line of measurements t And S y = r [ (r)] sine arc tan (v/c) Equation 10 - b 11 - Real time location motion rotational aberrations Visual effects: A - Along the line of measurement B - Perpendicular to the line of measurement [ ] t S x = r (r) [1 - sine arc tan (v/c)] With (r) = 0 Then S x = r [1 - sine arc tan (v/c)] Equation 11 - a With (v/c) << 1 Then S x = r [1 - (v/c) ] Equation 11 - b This Equation (5 - b) is Lorentz's along the line of measurement length contraction 150 years historical mistake With (r) = 0 S y = r sine arc tan (v/c) Equation 11 - c With (v/c) << 1 S y = r (v/c) Equation 11 - d This Equation (5 - d) is Lorentz's perpendicular to the line of measurement length contraction 150 years historical mistake 12 - Real time location motion translational aberrations Visual effects: S x= r
[ (r)] t

[1 - sine arc tan (v/c)]

With (r) 0; v = 0 Then along the line of measurement [ ] t S x = r (r) S y = r sine arc tan (v/c)

Equation 12 - a

Page 42 With (r) 0; v = 0 Then perpendicular to the line of measurement [ ] t S y = r (r) And [ ] t S x = S y = r (r) 13 - Real time A - Along the line of measurement B - Perpendicular to the line of measurement
(r) S = r (r) S=c And r = c t [ + (r)] t = t (r)

Equation 12 - b Equation 12- c

]t

S=r

[ (r) + (r)] t [ (r) + (r)] t [ (r) + (r)] t

P = {[v + r [ (r) + (r)]}

F = { + 2 [ (r) + (r)] v - [ (r) + (r)] r}

14 - Time delays concepts A - Along the line of measurement B - Perpendicular to the line of measurement C - Real time delays [ + (r)] t S = r (r) S=c And r = c t [ + (r)] t = t (r) = t {cosine [ (r) + (r)] t + sine [ (r) + (r)] t} With (r) = 0 Taking (r) t = arc tan (v/c); v = velocity; c = light or signal velocity Velocity v could be orbital, or, spin, or, orbital and spin and it is a perpendicular to the line of measurement velocity [ (r)] t With = 0; = t And = t [cosine t + sine t] And (x) = t cosine t = t [1 - 2 sine ( t/2)] = (x) - t = - 2 t sine ( t/2) (x) = t cosine (r) t = t [1 - sine arc tan (v/c)] (y) = t sine arc tan (v/c) With (v/c) << 1 Along the line of measurement (x) = t [1 - (v/c) ] Perpendicular to the line of measurement (y) = t (v/c) 15 - Time delays applications I planetary and binary stars motion

Page 43 [Villanova University Relativity Stupidity] [ + (r)] t = t (r) = - 2 t sine ( t/2) /2 = - t sine ( t/2) = t + [ - t] This addition operation can be a multiplication Or, = t [/t] The definition of a visual Illusion time delay is /t = cosine + sine = ; = arc tan (v/c) With v = relative velocity and c = velocity of light. = t this formula is the magic sock of Physics or the Bully equation Real time = event time x Visual effects = (x) + (y) = t = t [cosine + sine ] (x) = t cosine = t [1 - 2 sine (/2)] (x) - t = - 2 t sin {[arc tan (v/c)]/2} = - 2 t sin {[arc tan (v/c)]/2} = - 2 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(v +/- v*)/c] sec/ century = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(v +/v*)/c] arc sec/century Since idiots are idiots and some times 1/2 period scientists use instead of a full period you would find many cases that two Astrophysicists give an answer and one double the other's answer like in the most famous case in astronomy and that would be Dr Guinan of Villanova University with DI Herculis apsidal motion of 0.65 1985 and DR Martynov of 1.3 in 2008. Earth velocity is 29.8 km/sec Venus velocity is 35.1km/sec Mars velocity is 47.9 km/sec DI Herculis is 103.5 km/sec In case of mercury they use 1/2 cycle or use Venus orbit to calculate Mercury because Mercury is closer to the sun and disappears more than Venus and Venus is a bright planet that looks like a star. In the original calculation of 1859 the used 1/2 cycle because of the proximity of Mercury to the SUN And = - 15x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(v - v*)/c] arc sec/century

With v = 47.9 km/sec and v* = 29.8 Page 44 = - 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(47.9 - 29.8)/c] arc sec/century = 43.0 arc second per century Then they later came and used Venus as reference for measuring and used full cycle because Venus look like a morning star and can be seen better If t = 100 years and v = Orbital velocity of Mercury - Orbital velocity of Venus = - 2 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan (47.9 - 35.1/300,000) sec = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan (47.9 35.1/300,000) = 43.0 arc per century for mercury. Venus is bright like a star and it is used to calculate Mercury's orbit. If t = 100 years and v = Orbital velocity of Venus - Orbital velocity of Earth = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan (35.1 29.8/300,000) = 8.3 arc sec per century for Venus Earth motion is used to calculate Venus' orbit. This same formula applies to stars = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(v - v*)/c] arc sec/century DI Herculis It all came from this equation and sometimes 1/2 the period = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(v - v*)/c] arc sec/century V* (p) = [GM/ (m + M) a] = 96.84 km/sec V* (s) = [Gm/ (m + M) a] = 110.34km/sec With v = [V* (p) + V* (s)]/2 = [96.84 + 110.34]/2 =103.5887398km/sec And v + v* = 103.5887398 + 29.8 = 133.3887398 = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(v +/- v*)/c] arc sec/century = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(133.39)/300,000] = 1.3 arc sec/century

In the 1/2 period method = - 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(v - v*)/c] arc sec/century = 1.3 /2 = 0.65 Go to NASA Website SAO/NASA see how their PHD'S are more like of GED'S and type: Apsidal motion 1985 and pick up the article written by Villanova 5th grades And then type: Apsidal motion 2010 and pick up the article written by the same Kinder Gardeners Dr Edward Guinan and Frank Maloney Page 45 16 - Time delays and the creation of elementary particles Looting DOE and other USA government institutions is a common place because corporate academia of western nations will say anything publish anything based on nothing for jobs money prestige Nobel Prizes and no physics and because western politician are corporate corrupt and shallow science educated politicians and will give a bucket of money for a bucket full of nothing because money is not coming out from their pockets and they have no clue what they are paying except they are told it is good! It is stinking well and they are paying nothing and nothing is dark energy. To prove dark energy exists for a scientifically ignorant government and looting scientists, scientists took a bucket with a phototube registering flashes between two elevations. The difference in count is taken as proof of the existence of elementary nuclear particles and dark energy. I Joe Nahhas have had accused western scientists of fraud since July 4th, 1973 and this article is part of the proof that at least 88.88 % of western physicists published work is fraud and fraud is dark energy. Introduction: The elimination of relativity theory is a matter of time and not a matter of science. The death of E = mc in inevitable because it was based on visual illusion. Visual Illusions is a characteristic of the nuclear world and they are a result of bad measurements. Measurements are done wrong for past 350 years starting with Newton. Want to see how E = mc trick? It is shown below but for now read this Time dilations tricks are scatter experiments. I taught in colleges for few years and I can explain it and it is called Scatter and not time dilations. Real time Physics = event time Physics + time delays Physics T is real time = t is event time + [T - t; real time - event time] T = t + [T- t] T=T T = t [T/t] T/t = e ; = arc tan (v/c) this is the magic sock equation for looting T = t e = t [cosine + sine ] T = T (x) + T (y) = t [cosine + sine ]

T (x) = = t cosine = t [1 - 2 sine (/2)] = T (x) - t = - 2 t sine (/2) = T (x) - t = - 2 t sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]} = - 2 t sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]} With (v/c) = 1/n = 1/1.0003 = n = index of refraction of air = - 2 t sine {1/2[arc tan (1/1.0003)]} /t = - 2 sine {1/2[arc tan (1/1.0003)]} /t = - 0.292787177 Page 46 N = N (0) e N = N (0) e N = N (0) e N = N (0) e
/t = - 2 sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]} - 2 sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]} /t = - 0.292787177 - 0.292787177

In an MIT 1962 video that is sold and distributed around the world two gentlemen had a Bucket with a photo sensor inside it registering flashes between two elevations at a mountain top and at sea level The vertical showers of - Meson were counted through a horizontal counter: On a mountain top of 1.943 km height ....... 564 flashes caught on screen and counted in one hour At sea Level.......................................... 412 flashes caught on screen and counted in one hour This count is given as experimental proof of the existence of - Mesons and time dilations. Is this time dilation? Absolutely not! 1943 meters height 1500 meters height 1500 meters height 1000 meters height 0500 meters height ************************** * *** * * ** * ** * * * ** * ** * * * ** * ** * * * *** ** * *** * *** * ** * *** * ** * ** * *** *** ** ** * ** **** *** * *** * **** * ** *** *** ** ** * ** **** *** * *** * **** * ** *** **** * ** * * ** * ***

I say this is not time dilations but diffraction due to an increase of air density between the two different locations and here is the proof - 0.292787177 N = N (0) e N = 564 e From this equation
- 0.292787177

= 420.8640 --------------------------------- One

/t = - 0.292787177= 0.292787177 And = = 0.292787177 t = 0.292787177 (y/c) = 0.292787177 (1.943km/300,000km) -6 = 1.896 micro seconds 2 x 10 sec --------------------------------------- two

With a made up imaginary particle proof of existence and a made - up measured life time now mass become an easier made -up. When the mass of - Muon were to be measured cloud chambers were used using Aerosols and Aerosols have a refractive index of 1.393, from published data and if we take n as 1.393, /t = - 2 sine {1/2[arc tan (1/1.393)]} /t = - 0.187647831 /t = 0.187647831= 0.187647831 /t 1/0.187647931 With m = m (0) e = m (e) e And m = 206.79 m (e) (1979) data --------------------------- Three This is the mass of the - Meson; or, - Muon Page 47 This can be done with more accurate results and can be seen from a totally different new view point And use (v/c) = 1/d; d = density of air at 1 km half distance = 1/1.07; engineering tables. Then, T = t e ; = arc tan (v/c) Means N = N (0) e And m = m (0) e

; = arc tan (v/c)

; = arc tan (v/c)

T = t e = t [cosine + sine ] T = T (x) + T (y) = t [cosine + sine ] T (x) = = t cosine = t [1 - 2 sine (/2)] = T (x) - t = - 2 t sine (/2) = T (x) - t = - 2 t sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]} = - 2 t sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]} T (x) = = t cosine = t cosine arc tan (v/c) Then N (x) = = N (0) cosine = N (0) cosine arc tan (v/c) N (x) = N (0) cosine arc tan (v/c) And m (x) = m (0) cosine arc tan (v/c) A- N (x) = N (0) cosine arc tan (1/d) N (x) = 564 cosine arc tan (1/1.07) N (x) = 412.089522 B - T (x) = T (0) cosine arc tan (1/1.07) T (x) = (1.943/300,000) cosine arc tan (1/1.07) -6 T (x) = 2.054368496 x 10 sec C - We should have m = m (0) cosine arc tan (v/c) If you use T (x) = T (0) cosine arc tan (1/1.07) = - 2 t sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]} And / t = 2 t sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]}

And / t = 2 sine {1/2[arc tan (1/n)]} And / t = 2 sine {1/2[arc tan (1/1.393)]} And / t = 0.187647931 t/ 1/0.187647931 And m = m (0) e = m (0) e And m = 206.79 m (e) (1979) data --------------------------- Three With a made up imaginary particle proof of existence and a made - up measured life time now mass become an easier made -up. When the mass of - Muon were to be measured cloud chambers were used using Aerosols and Aerosols have a refractive index of 1.393, from published data and if we take n as 1.393, And m = 206.79 m (e) (1979) data --------------------------- Three Page 48 What happened is the amount of diffracted electrons was considered as the mass of a new particle when it is an average of 206.79 electrons. What I am saying is that the "Atom" is white man trash and thanks to: or (564 - 412) x [564/4l2] 206.79 17 - Real time Straight line [ + (r)] t S = r (r) With (r) = 0 [ (r)] t Then S = r = r [cosine t + sine t] Let r = r = v t Then S = v t [cosine t + sine t] S x + S y = v t [cosine t] + v t [ sine t] Along the line of measurement S x = v t cosine t Perpendicular to the line of measurement S y = v t sine t At time of measurement w t = arc tan (v/c) S x = v t cosine arc tan (v/c) S y = v t sine arc tan (v/c) If v = c Then S x = v t cosine arc tan (v/c) = c t cosine arc tan (c/c) = c t cosine (/4) = c t / 2 S y = v t sine arc tan (v/c) = c t sine arc tan (c/c) = c t sine (/4) = c t / 2 S=ct If r = r (0) S x = r (0) cosine arc tan (v/c) = r (0) [1 - sine arc tan (v/c)] S y = r (0) sine arc tan (v/c) If v << 1 then S x = r (0) cosine arc tan (v/c) = r (0) [1 - (v/c) ] S y = r (0) (v/c) 18 - Real time circular motion [ + (r)] t S = r (r) And r = r S=r S=r

r (1) r (1) r (1)

[ (r) + (r)] t

[ (r)] t + [ + (r) t]

S = r (r)] t With (r) = 0 [ + (r) t] S=r

+ [ + (r) t]

19 - Real time clock wise circular motion [ + (r)] t S = r (r) And r = r S=r S=r
- -

r (1) r (1) Page 49

[ (r) + (r)] t

[ (r)] t - [ - (r) t] [ (r)] t - [ - (r) t]

r (1)

S=r With (r) = 0 - [ - (r) t] S=r

20 - Real time angular velocity Is ' = v/r = v (m)/r And = + [v* (e) + v (e)]/r 21 - Real time Areal velocity A = r x d r/2 Areal velocity: d A/d t = r x (d r/2d t)= r x v/2 And S x (d S/2d t) = S x P/2 [ + (r)] t [ + (r)] t = r (r) x {[v + r [ (r) + (r)]} (r) }/2 =r x v/2 S x P/2 =r x v/2
2 [ (r) + (r)] t 2 [ (r) + (r)] t

22 - Real time Areal velocity in polar coordinates 2 [ (r) + (r)] t S x P/2 =r x v/2 = [r r (1)] x [r' r (1) + r ' (1)]/2 2 [ (r) + (r)] t = (r '/2) [ ] 23 - Real time motion Areal velocity visual effects in polar coordinates 2 [ (r) + (r)] t S x P/2 =r x v/2 = [r r (1)] x [r' r (1) + r ' (1)]/2 2 [ (r) + (r)] t = (r '/2) [ ] With (r) = 0 2 (r) t S x P/2 = (r '/2) [ ] 24 - Real time motion Areal velocity visual effects delay factor in polar coordinates

(r) (r) S x P/2 =r x v/2 = [r r (1)] x [r' r (1) + r ' (1)]/2 2 [ (r) + (r)] t = (r '/2) [ ] With (r) = 0 2 (r) t S x P/2 = (r '/2) [ ] = (r '/2) [cosine 2 t + sine 2 t] S x P/2 (x) = (r '/2) cosine 2 t = (r '/2) [1 - sine t] S x P/2 (x) - (r '/2) = - r ' sine t

2 [

]t

Page 50 Approximation S x P/2 (x) - (r '/2) = - r ' sine t With T = arc tan (v/c) S x P/2 (x) - (r '/2) = - r ' sine arc tan (v/c) With (v/c) << 1 Then S x P/2 (x) - (r '/2) = - r ' (v/c) 25- Real time Areal velocity visual effects for an ellipse Then S x P/2 (x) - (r '/2) = - r ' (v/c) With r ' = 2 a b Then S x P/2 (x) - (r '/2) = [- 2 a b/T] (v/c) 26 - Advance of Perihelion visual effects {S x P/2 (x) - (r '/2)} 2/a (1 - ) } = [- 2 a b/T] (v/c) [2/ a (1 - ) ] = - 4 (b/a) (v/c) / T (1 - ) = - 4 {[ (1 - )]/ T (1 - ) } (v/c) 27 - Advance of Perihelion visual effects in arc sec/ century. {S x P/2 (x) - (r '/2)} 2/a (1 - ) } = - 4 {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) {(180/) (36526) (3600)} = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) 28 - Advance of Perihelion visual effects of Planet mercury in arc sec/ century. {S x P/2 (x) - (r '/2)} 2/a (1 - ) } = - 4 {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) {(180/) (36526) (3600)} = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) With = .206, T = 88; v = v* + v; v* = orbital velocity = 47.9 km/sec v = spin speed of observer on earth = 0.3km/sec Europe. v = v* + v = 48.2 km/sec; v (mercury) = 3 m/s And W" (calculated) = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) = [-720x36526x3600/88] (1.552) (48.2/300,000) = 43.10 Arc sec /century 29- Advance of Perihelion visual effects of Planet Venus in arc sec/ century. {S x P/2 (x) - (r '/2)} 2/a (1 - ) } = - 4 {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c)

{(180/) (36526) (3600)} = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) With = .206, T = 244.7; v = v* + v; v* = orbital velocity = 35.12 km/sec v = spin speed of observer on earth = 0.3km/sec Europe. And v (Mercury) = 6.52km/sec v = v* + v = 41.94 km/sec And W" (calculated) = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) = [-720x36526x3600/244.7] (1.00761) (41.94/300,000) = 8.17 Arc sec /century 30 - Binary stars apsidal motion in arc sec/century W" (calculated) = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century Page 51 31 - Binary stars apsidal motion in arc degree/ century W" (calculated) = [-720x36526/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century 32 - Binary stars apsidal motion in arc degree/year W" (calculated) = [-720x365.26/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century 33 - Binary stars apsidal motion delays in arc degree/cycle W" (calculated) = [-720/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century 34 - Global Positioning Systems in arc second per century: W" (calculated) = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century 35 - Global Positioning Systems in arc degree /century W" (calculated) = [-720x36528/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century 36 - Global Positioning Systems in arc second per year: W" (calculated) = [-720x365.26x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century 37 - Global Positioning Systems in arc degree per year: W" (calculated) = [-720x365.26/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century 38 - Global Positioning Systems delays in arc degree per cycle: W" (calculated) = [-720/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century 39- Global Positioning Systems delays in arc second per cycle: W" (calculated) = [-720x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century 40- Global Positioning Systems delays in arc second per day: W" (calculated) = [-720x3600] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century 41- Global Positioning Systems delays in second per cycle: W" (calculated) = [24/360] [-720x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century 42 - Global Positioning Systems delays in second per day:

U (seconds/day) = [-720x 3600/15] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) sec/day 43 - Global Positioning System Circular Satellite Orbits time delays in seconds/day U (seconds/day) = [-720x 3600/15] (v/c) sec/day 44- Application of Global positioning system GPS Data: T = 0.5 days satellite orbital Period; = 0 And v = 0.465km/sec Earth spin speed; And v* = 14,000 km/hr = 35/9 km/second Then v* +/- v = 35/9 = 3.88888889km/sec - 0.465km/second Page 52 We subtracted because satellite and motion and spin orientations are opposite GPS time delays are given by this formula per day in seconds of an arc W" (ob) = (-720x3600/T) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) ]} [(v +/- v*)/c] seconds/day W" (ob) = (-720x36/0.5) (1) [3.423888889/300,000] seconds of arc /1 day W" (ob) = 0.000675246 arc seconds per day to get this answer in seconds divide by 24hours/360degress = 15 U [seconds] = 0.000675246 x [24/360] seconds/day U = 0.000045016 seconds/day = 45 micro seconds /day 45 - Interplanetary telecommunications around the Sun round trip time delays = [16 G M/c] [1 +/- (v/v*)] 46- Interplanetary telecommunications around the Sun round trip time delays Nahhas constant (0) = 16 G M/c = 247.597 s 48 - Mars telecommunications around the sun time delays Shapiro's historical mistake = [16 G M/c] [1 + (v/v*)] = 250 s 46 - Circular motion Advance of starting point visual effects W" (calculated) = [-720x36526x3600/T] (v/c) arc sec/ century; = 0 49- Time Factor S x = r [1 - sine arc tan (v/c)] S x = r [1 - sine arc tan (v/c)] If (v/c) = (1/n) = (1/ refractive index) and the velocity is constant in absolute value Or S x = c (x) and r = c t; then (x) = t [1 - sine arc tan (v/c)] Along the line of measurement (x) = t [1 - sine arc tan (1/n)] Perpendicular to the line of measurement S y = r sine arc tan (v/c)

S y = r sine arc tan (v/c) And (y) = t sine arc tan (v/c) = t sine arc tan (1/n) 50 - Reines and Cowans: 1953 Savannah River Neutrino experiment historical mistake Along the line of measurement (x) = t [1 - sine arc tan (1/n)] With t = 25 s And n of water = 1.33 < n < 1.44 = n of tri ethyl benzene (x) = t [1 - sine arc tan (1/n)] 4.67 s < (x) < 5 s Page 53

Newton's equations solved wrong for 350 years

Abstract: This is the real time solution to the problem of planetary system motion around their motion sun and the solution to the 350 years advance of perihelion/apsidal motion puzzle. This is the proof that the motion of planets around their mother sun is an ellipse and a real time "apparent" visual effect advance of perihelion/ apsidal motion. With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r Newton's Gravitational Equation And d (mr')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law Real time solution is: [ + (r)] t Real time orbit: r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+cos)] (r)
(m) Real time mass m = m (, 0) (m) "Apparent advance of perihelion" W" (cal) = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } [(v+ v*)/c] arc seconds/100 years

(1) (2)

]t

Proof: With (2): d (mr')/d t = 0 Then mr' = constant = H (0, 0) = m (0, 0) h (0, 0); h (0, 0) = r (0, 0) ' (0, 0) = m (0, 0) r (0, 0) '(0, 0); h (, 0) = [r (, 0)] [' (, 0)] = [m (, 0)] h (, 0); h (, 0) = [r (, 0)] ['(, 0)] = [m (, 0)] [r (, 0)] ['(, 0)] = [m (, t)] [r (, t)] [' (, t)] = [m (, 0) m (0, t)] [r (, 0) r (0, t)] [' (, t)] = [m (, 0) m (0, t)] [r (, 0) r (0, t)] ['(, 0) ' (0, t)] Wi th mr' = constant Differentiate with respect to time Then 2mm'r' + 2mrr'' + mr" = 0 Divide by mr'

Then 2 (m'/m) + 2(r'/r) + "/' = 0 This equation will have a solution 2 (m'/m) = 2[ (m) + (m)] And 2(r'/r) = 2[ (r) + (r)] And "/' = -2{ (m) + (r) + [ (m) + (r)]} Then (m'/m) = [ (m) + (m)] Or d m/m d t = [ (m) + (m)] And dm/m = [ (m) + (m)] d t [ + (m)] t Then m = m (0) (m) Page 54 And m = m (0) m (0, t); m (0, t) = With initial spatial condition that can be taken at t = 0 anywhere then m (0) = m (, 0) [ + (m)] t And m = m (, 0) m (0, t) = m (, 0) (m) And m (0, t) = Exp [ (m) + (m)] t Similarly we can get [ + (r)] t Also, r = r (, 0) r (0, t) = r (, 0) (r) With r (0, t) =
[ (r) + (r)] t [ (m) + (m)] t

Then '(, t) = {H (0, 0)/ [m (, 0) r (, 0)]}

-2{[ + ] + [

-2{[ (m) + (m)] + [ (m) + (m)]} t

+ ]} t

(m) (m) (m) (m) And '(, t) = ' (, 0)] And, '(, t) = ' (, 0) ' (0, t) -2{[ (m) + (m)] + [ (m) + (m)]} t And ' (0, t) = Also '(, 0) = H (, 0)/ m (, 0) r (, 0) And '(0, 0) = {H (0, 0)/ [m (0, 0) r (0, 0)]} With (1): d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r = -GmM/mr And d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -Gm (, 0) m (0, t) M/ (mr) Let m r =1/u Then d (m r)/d t = -u'/u = - (1/u) (') d u/d = (- '/u) d u/d = -H d u/d And d (m r)/dt = -H'du/d = - Hu [du/d]

-Hu [du/d] - (1/u) (Hu) = -Gm (, 0) m (0, t) Mu [du/ d] + u = Gm (, 0) m (0, t) M/ H t = 0; m (0, 0) = 1 u = Gm (, 0) M/ H + A cosine =Gm (, 0) M (, 0)/ h (, 0) And m r = 1/u = 1/ [Gm (, 0) M (, 0)/ h (, 0) + A cosine ] = [h/ Gm (, 0) M (, 0)]/ {1 + [Ah/ Gm (, 0) M (, 0)] [cosine ]} = [h/Gm (, 0) M (, 0)]/ (1 + cosine ) Then m (, 0) r (, 0) = [a (1-)/ (1+cos)] m (, 0) Dividing by m (, 0) Then r (, 0) = a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )

This is Newton's Classical Equation solution of two body problem which is the equation of an ellipse of semi-major axis of length a and semi minor axis b = a (1 - ) and focus length c = a And m r = m (, t) r (, t) = m (, 0) m (0, t) r (, 0) r (0, t) [ + (r)] t Then, r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )] (r) --------------------------------- I This is the equation I was looking for This equation is real time Universal mechanics [ + (r)] t This: r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )] (r) --------------------------------- I It is the math formula that matches a physical experiment Page 55 What we see is in real time [ + (r)] t This: r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+cos)] (r) --------------------------------- I If time is frozen that is t = 0 This is event time Then r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )] we get the classical or event time solution ----------- II Relativistic is the difference between I and II And it is the visual illusion between actual motion II and Visual motion I The difference between an event and its measurement in real time Real time = Event time + time delays [Object + visual effect] = object + visual effect Re- writing Modern physics and the history of physics is the intention of this book Unless Physicists can bring back Einstein to drive the time travel bus and make a jump from space to time to go see a 1956 live Elvis show in Tupelo Mississippi and bring the Bus back from time road to Highway roads then physicists are lying and lying is "University" Professors is job # 1. Giving stupidity a Nobel Prize does not make it science but stupidity with a Nobel tag and that would make it Nobel stupidity and not science. The only proof of space-time physics is that there is no proof of space time physics, a case of 110 years of lying Nobel Prize winner physics and physicists and 400 years of astronomy and astronomers who can not read their scopes. It is not just about dumping relativity theory and quantum mechanics and al other University physics but it is about dumping relativity theory and quantum and all other University stupidity physics both used for Nature's descriptions with the 100,000 living space-timers physicists and

the 100,000 dead space - time physicists education and make believe attached to it. Newtons reply to Eistein: There are no physicist after me, only idiots.