dEVIANT sECTs ANd sCHOLARs:THE dEVIANT sHIA sECT:BELIEfs Of THE sHIAs

INTRODUCTION The Sunni Muslims of today have become targets of Iranian propaganda. By reading through Shia literature, they conclude that Khomeini was the great modern day Islamic leader who despised the separation of the Sunnis and Shias within the Islamic Community. They also believe that Khomeini preferred a total Islamic Unity of both Sunnis and Shias and that Khomeini respected the Great Prophet of Islam (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), the Khulafa-e-Rashideen and all the Sahaba (radi Allahu anhu anhum ajma'in). They are also under the impression that Khomeini labelled as "Shaitaan" those who spoke of a separate Shia and Sunni group within the Muslim Community. Since the Shias subscribe to the holding of Meelad and Urs celebrations, the reading of Salat or Salaam on the Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), visiting of graves, reading of Majaalis during Muharram, etc. Sunni Muslims are fraudulently led to believe, through the local Iranian agency, that there are no differences in Aqaaid (Beliefs) between Sunnis and Shias, more so, because the Shias also reject and refute the Najdi and Wahabi beliefs. In this manner, it would be a matter of time before the Shias gain closeness to the hearts of the Sunnis. This will give them a better and quicker chance to convert them to the Shia fold. This in reality, is the real basis of Taqiyyah. WHAT IS TAQIYYAH? TAQIYYAH, in Shia'ite doctrine, is the concealing of the truth for the purposes of misleading the innocent believers in the name of religion. This, in Shia'ite belief, is regarded as a great form of Ibaadah carrying a very great reward. In essence, Taqiyyah involves lying and deceitfully misleading innocent Muslims into the Shia'ite fold.

For this purpose, it is important to clearly present to the Sunni Muslims the beliefs of "Imam" Khomeini. These beliefs are written by himself in two of his books, "KASHFUL ASRAR" and "AL HUKUMATUL ISLAMIA." It is from these books that one would discover the false Islam as propagated by the Iranians. It would further help us to stop their fierce propaganda work in South Africa. Alhamdulillah! The Sunnis, with the help of Quranic commentaries, examples from the life of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), the history of the Khulafa-e-Rashideen and the history of the Sahaba-e-Kiraam (radi Allahu anhum ajma'in), Tableegh work and Islamic propagation is vigorous and successful amongst the South African Muslim communities. However, the Shia movement has attempted to undermine and retard the good Islamic propagation work carried out by the Sunnis. The Shia brand of Islam or so-called "Islam" incorporates the following beliefs:(a). The HOLY QURAN in its present form is MUHARRAF (i.e. it has been changed and it is in an incomplete form). (b). The KHULAFA-E-RASHIDEEN - The first three Khulafa who ruled after Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), namely, Sayyiduna Abu Bakr Siddique (radi Allahu anhu), Sayyiduna Umar Farooq (radi Allahu anhu) and Sayyiduna Uthman Ghani (radi Allahu anhu) are regarded as wicked and sinful; and insults are heaped upon the beloved Companions of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) to the extent that they are called MURTADD or apostate (one who is out of the fold of Islam). It is the responsibility of every Muslim to use every means at his or her disposal to wipe out the pest of Shia'ism and propagate the TRUE form of Islam. SHIA AQAAID OR BELIEFS We have listed some of the major Shia beliefs below:1. Together with the testifying of the Oneness of Allah and accepting the Prophethood of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), it is also a condition of Imaan to testify to the Imaamat of the 12 Imaams.

2. It is Fardh to follow the A'IMMA in the same manner as a Muslim ought to follow Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). 3. MU'TAH (Temporary Marriage) is not only JAA'IZ but also a source of great blessings and Sawaabs. Temporary marriage amongst the SHIAS does not require the procedure of Nikah as shown to us by Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). It is just a temporary agreement between a man and a woman either to spend the night, a week, a month or a year together for the purposes of satisfying their lust. 4. The chain of Prophethood is not complete, but rather it is still in progress in the form of the appearance of Imaams from time to time. 5. The QURAN SHAREEF has two-thirds of its volume missing. The present form only represents one-third of the original Quran. 6. The original Quran was that which was compiled by Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) and Imaam-e-Ghaib, the hidden Imaam who will appear with it in the future. 7. TAQIYYAH is Fardh. Taqiyyah is a Shia'ite practice of concealing the truth for the purposes of misleading unsuspecting people into the Shia'ite fold. 8. After Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) left this world only few Sahabas were steadfast in spreading Islam. The rest turned apostate or MURTADDS (one who is out of the fold of Islam). The four Ashaabs accepted by the Shi'ites are:a. Sayyiduna Salman Farsi (radi Allahu anhu), b. Sayyiduna Abu Zarr Ghaffari (radi Allahu anhu), c. Sayyiduna Miqdad bin Aswad (radi Allahu anhu) and d. Sayyiduna Amaar bin Yaasir (radi Allahu anhu) e. Imaamat is the fifth pillar of Islam, the rejection of which amounts to Kufr. All the above Shia'ite beliefs are in direct conflict with established Islamic practices as shown by Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) and the teachings of the Holy Quran. The lives and character of the illustrious Sahaba (radi Allahu anhum ajma'in) have been confirmed by both Muslim and nonMuslim historians alike. The distorted views regarding the Sahabas, as presented by the Shia'ites, contradicts confirmed historical proof on the lives of the Sahabas. The Shia'ites believe that Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) was without distinction the first Caliph. They reject the Khilaafat of Sayyiduna Abu Bakr Siddique (radi Allahu anhu), Sayyiduna Umar Farooq (radi Allahu anhu) and Sayyiduna Uthman Ghani (radi Allahu anhu). VIEWS OF KHOMEINI FROM HIS BOOK, "KASHFUL ASRAR"

"From the examples I (Khomeini) have given, it shows that the Sheiks Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) and Umar (radi Allahu anhu) had acted against the Quran. For these people to behave in such a manner amongst the Muslims was not surprising. The Muslims (Sahaba-e-Kiraam) were also in such a state that they were either part of the same group (Abu Bakr - radi Allahu anhu and Umar -radi Allahu anhu) or they had similar intentions of becoming the government in power. "If they (the Muslims) did not side them (Abu Bakr - radi Allahu anhu - and Umar - radi Allahu anhu) then it was certain that they did not have the courage to speak out against those who behaved badly towards Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) and his beloved daughter (Fathima - radi Allahu anha). "In short, even if mention was made in the Quran in clear words on this matter (The succession of Ali - radi Allahu anhu - as Caliph), they would not have changed their intentions, and even at the Command of Allah they would not have given up the seat (of Government). "Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu), who had harboured pre-meditated plans, if anything, would have falsely forged a Hadith to put an end to this matter, just as he had done so to prevent Sayyiduna Fathima (radi Allahu anha) from receiving her inheritance. And it was not impossible for Umar (radi Allahu anhu) in the matter regarding the Imaamat and Khilaafat of Ali (radi Allahu anhu) to negate such a verse (regarding the Khilaafat of Ali - radi Allahu anhu) either by saying that there was a mistake in Allah's Revelation of the Ayah, or that Gibraeel had erred in transmitting (Allah's Message) correctly to Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam)." (KASHFUL ASRAR, PAGES 119120) KHOMEINI ON QURAN IN HIS "KASHFUL ASRAR" "TAHREEF (deliberate alteration of words to change the meaning of the holy books, namely, the Bible, etc.) is that fault which Muslims accuse Jews and Christians of indulging in, has proved to be found in the Ashaabs (of Rasoolullah - sallal laahu alaihi wasallam)." (KASHFUL ASRAR, PAGE 114) "It was easy for the Ashaabs (of Rasoolullah - sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) to

remove verses from the Holy Quran and deliberately add verses to it, and in this way forever concealing from the people of the world the true Quran." (KASHFUL ASRAR, PAGE 114)Yes, the above shocking statements are in Khomeini's book. Yet, it is the firm belief of the Muslims that the Holy Quran is the direct Word of Almighty Allah. The Holy Quran has been protected from any type of changes, removals and additions of verses or increase in volume, by Almighty Allah Himself. But, in the corrupt Shia propagation of Islam, the present day Quran is accepted as a changed version like the Tauraat and the Bible. And according to Mr. Khomeini, the Sahaba-i-Kiraam of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) had prevented the entire world from gaining access to the original Quran. MA'AAZALLAH! Allah forbid! The Shia'ite belief on the Quran even insults the glorious Khulafa-eRashideen, whose names are mentioned from the mimbars of every Masjid in the Khutbah in every Jummah; those two Khulafa (Sayyiduna Abu Bakr and Sayyiduna Umar) who are resting alongside of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) under the Green Dome; and those upon whom thousands of Muslims around the world send their Tribute and Salaams. Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) himself makes mention of the great service that Sayyiduna Abu Bakr Siddique (radi Allahu anhu) had provided to the Holy Quran. In the introduction of "FATHUL BARI" and "KANZUL A'MAL" appears a narration of Ibne Mubarak that Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) stated that: "In the service (compilation) of heavenly books (MASAAHIF), Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) would receive the greatest reward. May Allah's Mercy be on Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu). He was the first person to have started the compilation of the Holy Quran (Kitabullah)." THE STATUS OF IMAAMAT IN SHIA BELIEFS Khomeini in his book, "AL HUKUMATUL ISLAMIA", states that: "In our sect, from the necessary and fundamental beliefs, one necessary principle of our faith is that our Imaams have ranks that exceed those of close angels and the appointed Messengers." (ALHUKUMATUL ISLAAMIA, PAGE 52)

MUTAH (TEMPORARY MARRIAGE) Khomeini, in his Kitaab "THEHREERUL WASEELA," states in the section called Kitaabun Nikah that whilst Mutah is permissable with an adulterous woman, it is undesirable (KARAHAT) especially if the woman is a prostitute. SHIAS HATRED FOR SUNNIS In his ploy to pose as a leader of the Muslim world immediately after the revolution, and to gain popularity among Muslims, Khomeini stated in his reply to a question on SHIA-SUNNI differences, as follows: "I entreat Allah to consolidate Muslims on the basis of Kalimah. The superfluous differences between the Shia and Sunni brethren have been created by a group of international criminals. Our brethren must realise that we are all Muslims and followers of the Quran. We should not harbour mutual differences. May Allah grant us mutual consolidation." (Ruhollah Khomeini, Qom, Iran - 27 March 1979) This statement was made by Khomeini in reply to a certain Moulana Yusuf of Jamaat-e-Islamia Hind who questioned Khomeini in Qom (Iran) about the SHIA-SUNNI differences. The interview and reply which appears above in the Urdu and Persian language (not very clear, unfortunately) can be obtained from RAMADAN ANNUAL, Durban, July/August 1979 edition, Page 116. The statement was first published in "Radiance Views Weekly" of New Delhi, India. While one may think that there is nothing objectionable in Khomeini's statement, we would like you to now look at this "great world leader" and see how "tolerant" he is in his beliefs regarding Sunnis and others when he PRAISES a book with the following statement: "When Mahdi (alaihis salaam) appears, he will deal with the Sunnis and their Ulema first before dealing with the Kuffar, and he will kill and annihilate all of them (the Sunnis, their Ulema and the Kuffar)." (HAQQUL YAQEEN, ALLAMA BAAQIR MAJLISI, PAGE 139) This is the very same book that Khomeini PRAISES in his "Kashful Asrar" and has encouraged people to read it. This is in fact one of the cornerstones of

Shia belief. If Khomeini says that the Shia-Sunni difference is the work of "international criminals" then how is it that he supports and praises Allama Baaqir Majlisi's statement that Imam Mahdi will FIRST kill the Sunnis before dealing with the Kuffar!

REfUTATION Of sHIA BELIEfs

SAYYIDUNA ALI ON SAYYIDUNA ABU BAKR AND SAYYIDUNA UMAR (RADI ALLAHU ANHUM AJMA'IN) The Muslim Revivalist (Mujaddid) of the 14th Century, A'LA HADRAT IMAAM AHMED RAZA AL-QADERI (alaihir rahmah) in his book, "GHAYATUT TAHQEEQ FI IMAAMATUL 'ALI AS SIDDEEQ," quotes from "SAWA IQUL MUHARRIQAH" that: "Imaam Abul Qaasim Ismaeel Muhammad Bin Al Fazl Balkhi in his Kitaab, 'AS SUNNAH' stated that Imaam ibn Hajjar Makki reported that Alqamah (radi Allahu anhu) narrated that Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) was once informed that some people declared that he (Sayyiduna Ali) is higher in status than Hazraat Shaykhain (Abu Bakr and Umar) - radi Allahu anhuma. "Upon hearing this, he (Sayyiduna Ali) stood on the mimbar and declared after praises to Allah and His Messenger (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), 'O People! News had reached me that some people are saying that I have a higher status than Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) and Umar (radi Allahu anhu). Had I clarified the ruling earlier on this matter, then the subscribers to such a view would have certainly been punished by me." 'As from today, whosoever is heard to make such utterances is a slanderer (MUFTARI), and he shall be liable for the punishment of a slanderer, which is 80 lashes.' "Thereafter, he (Sayyiduna Ali) said, 'Without any doubt, after Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), the most excellent in the Ummah is Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu), followed by Umar, and after him Allah knows best whose status appears next.'" "Alqamah states that Sayyiduna Hassan Mujtaba (radi Allahu anhu) was present in that gathering and remarked, 'By Allah! If he (Sayyiduna Ali) was to make mention of the third name (after Umar Farooq), he would have mentioned the name of Uthman (radi Allahu anhu).' "

WHAT THE GREAT SAINTS AND SCHOLARS HAVE SAID IN REFUTATION OF THE BELIEFS OF THE SHIAS One of the greatest guides of the Sufiya-e-Alawiyyah, GHOUS-E-AZAM, SAYYID ABDUL QAADIR JILANI (alaihir rahmah), writes in his book, "GHUNYAT-UT-TAALIBIN", that: Sayyiduna Abu Bakr Siddique (radi Allahu anhu) became the Khalifa with the unanimity of the Muhajirs and Ansars, as follows:When Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) passed away, the Ansar-iKiram said, "Let one Amir be from you and one Amir be from us." Sayyiduna Umar (radi Allahu anhu) stood up and said, "O Ansar! Have you forgotten how Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) called Abu Bakr, 'the Imam of my Sahaba'?" They said, "We know, O Umar." Sayyiduna Umar (radi Allahu anhu) went on, "Is anyone among you higher than Abu Bakr?"The Ansar replied: "We trust ourselves to Allah's protection from considering ourselves higher than Abu Bakr." Then, Sayyiduna Umar (radi Allahu anhu) asked, "Who among you would tolerate to remove Abu Bakr from the ranking office where Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) appointed him?" The Ansar said, "None of us will tolerate it. We trust ourselves with Allah's protection from removing Abu Bakr." With the co-operation of the Muhajirs, they appointed Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) as the Khalifa. Sayyiduna Ali and Sayyiduna Zubair (radi Allahu anhuma) came later. Both accepted the Khalifa. Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) stood up three times and said each time, "Is there anyone among you who has given up choosing me as the Khalifa?" Sayyiduna Ali who was sitting in the front stood up and said, "None of us gives up. Nor shall we ever think of giving up. Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) has put you ahead of us. Who on earth can remove you?"Thus, we have heard through

strong and sound witnesses that the person who wanted Sayyiduna Abu Bakr Siddique (radi Allahu anhu) to become the Khalifa and uttered the most influential words, was Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu). For example, after the Camel Event, Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Kawa (radi Allahu anhu) came to Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) and said, "Did Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) tell you anything about the Caliphate?" Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) replied, "First we mind our duty concerning the Deen. The archstone of the Deen is Salaah. And we like and choose for the world what Allah Ta'ala and His Messenger (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) have chosen from among us. We have therefore chosen Abu Bakr as the Khalifa." As Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) was sick during the final days of his life, he appointed Sayyiduna Abu Bakr Siddique (radi Allahu anhu) as the Imaam in his place so that he would conduct the Salaah. Each time Sayyiduna Bilal (radi Allahu anhu) called the Adhan, Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) used to say, "Tell Abu Bakr to be the Imaam for the people." He used to say this repeatedly. This was taken to imply that after his demise Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) would be most suitable for Caliphate, and that each of Umar, Uthman and Ali (radi Allahu anhum ajma'in) was the most suitable for the Caliphate among the people of his time. ON THE ELECTION OF SAYYIDUNA ABU BAKR SIDDIQUE (RADI ALLAHU ANHU) AS THE FIRST CALIPH OF ISLAM IMAM-I-RABBANI, SHAIKH AHMAD SIRHINDI MUJADDID ALF THANI (alaihir rahmah), in his famous book, "RADD -E-RAWAAFID", says: Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) willingly acknowledged Sayyiduna Abu Bakr Siddique's (radi Allahu anhu) Caliphate. The Shias, who knew this fact said, "He admitted it unwillingly," without saying anything more than. However, after Rasulullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) physically left this world, the Sahaba (radi Allahu anhum ajma'in) embarked on a job of appointing the Khalifa before the interment (burial). They considered it Wajib or necessary. Since the Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) had commanded that the guilty should be punished as prescribed by the Shariat; that they (the Muslims) should be ready for war; in addition to other things which the government should do, it was Wajib to elect the representative who would execute these Wajibs.

Therefore, Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) stood up and said, "If you worship Sayyiduna Muhammad (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), know that he passed away. If you worship Allahu Ta'ala know that Allah never dies, His life is Endless.""You have to choose someone to carry out His Commandments. Think, find, and choose!" Everybody agreed with him. Sayyiduna Umar (radi Allahu anhu) immediately stood up and said, "We want you, Abu Bakr!"All those present there said, "We have elected you." Then, Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) mounted the mimbar and looked around, "I cannot see Zubair. Call him." When Sayyiduna Zubair (radi Allahu anhu) came, Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) said to him, "The Muslims have elected me as the Khalifa. Will you disagree with their unanimity?""O You, the Messenger's (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) Khalifa! I do not disagree," and held out his hand and did Musaafaha (shook hands in a manner prescribed by Islam) with him in attendance. Sayyiduna Ali and Sayyiduna Zubair (radi Allahu anhuma) apologised to the Khalifa for being late for the election, and said, "We did not come because we were not notified in advance. We are sorry about it. We see that who is worthy of the Caliphate amongst us is Sayyiduna Abu Bakr. For he was Rasulullah's (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) companion in the cave. He is the most honoured and the best of us. Rasulullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) chose him as the Imaam from amongst us. We performed Namaaz behind Him." If Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) had not been worthy of the Caliphate, Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) would NOT have admitted him and would have said, "It is my right." As a matter of fact, he refused Sayyiduna Muawiyyah (radi Allahu anhu) being the Khalifa. Although Sayyiduna Muawiyyah's (radi Allahu anhu) army was very strong, he strove hard so that he himself would be the Khalifa. As a result of this, many lives were lost. Since he asked for his right at such a difficult situation, it would have been much easier to ask for it from Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) if he had considered it his right. He would have asked to be chosen, and that would have been done immediately.

After choosing Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) as the Khalifa and paying homage to him, Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) sat in front of the mimbar. In their next conversation he gave effective answers to the Khalifa's questions and supported him. THE ELECTION OF SAYYIDUNA ABU BAKR SIDDIQUE (RADI ALLAHU ANHU) BASED ON IJTIHAD MAWLANA UTHMAN BIN NASSIR EFFENDI (alaihir rahmah), in his book, "TAZKIYYA-I-AHLE-BAYT," writes: When the Ashaab-i-Kiraam (radi Allahu anhum ajma'in) were confronted with something that they did not know how to do, (they would look the matter up in the SUNNAT-I-SANIYYA), and if they did not find a solution in the Sunnat-i-Saniyya, either, they would (decide how to) do it through a method called RE'Y (finding) and QIYAS (comparison), that is, by comparing it with other matters they knew how to do. This paved the way to IJTIHAD. If the Ijtihads of the Ashaab-i-Kiraam or other MUJTAHIDS agree on a matter, they will be no doubt left pertaining to the matter. This consensus of Ijtihads was called IJMA-I-UMMAT. Making Ijtihad requires having profound knowledge. Scholars who possess this deep knowledge (and are therefore capable of making Ijtihad) are called Mujtahid. If the Ijtihads made by Mujtahids do not agree with one another, it becomes Wajib for each Mujtahid to act upon his own Ijtihad. The Caliphate election was a matter of Ijtihad, too. There were Hadith Shareefs denoting that Sayyiduna Abu Bakr, Sayyiduna Umar, Sayyiduna Uthman and Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhum ajma'in) would become Khalifa. But, the time for any of them was not stated clearly. Rasulullah (sallal laahu alaihi was sallam) did not say, "APPOINT SO AND SO KHALIFA AFTER ME." He left this job over to the Ashaab-i-Kiraam to decide on. The Ijtihads made by the Ashaab-i-Kiraam pertaining to Caliphate election did not agree with one another. There were three different Ijtihads: The first Ijtihad was the Ansar's re'y (finding): They said that the person "who had served Islam most must be Khalifa. The Arabs became Muslims in the shade of our swords. Therefore, one of us must be Khalifa."

The second Ijtihad was the re'y (finding) of most of the Ashaab-i-Kiraam (radi Allahu anhum ajma'in): They said that the Khalifa "must be powerful enough to enforce the regulations among the Ummat. The most honourable and the most powerful tribe among the Arabs is the Quraish. The Khalifa will have to be one from among the Quraish." The third Ijtihad was the re'y (finding) of the Hashimis: They said that "one of Rasulullah's (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) relations must be Khalifa." THE CORRECT ONE OF THESE THREE IJTIHADS WAS THE SECOND ONE Yes, the Ansar were of great help to Islam. And, the relations of Rasulullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), on the other hand, were very honourable. Yet, Caliphate was not a chair for rest granted as a reward for past services. Nor was it an inheritable property to be handed over to relations. The second Ijtihad entailed that Caliphate was to be given to the Quraish tribe not because Rasulullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) was from this tribe, but because the Quraish was a tribe renowned throughout Arabia for its honour, power, influence and dignity. For Caliphate was an office to provide unity, loyalty and social order among Muslims. And doing this, in its turn, would necessitate being authoritative. The Khalifa's duty is to prevent mischief and instigation, to secure peace and freedom, to administer Jihad, and to maintain order so that Muslims carry on their affairs and businesses easily and smoothly. Doing all these things requires power. What the Ashaab-i-Kiraam (alaihim-ur-ridwaan) took into consideration in the Caliphate election was to unite the Muslim tribes so as to establish a powerful state. Giving the office of Caliphate to the Hashimis, who were only one out of ten Quraish tribes, would hardly provide this unity. The higher the number of people establishing a government, the more powerful the government. For this reason, it would be necessary to one of the notables of the Quraish. And the person to be elected would have to be a superior one, not only in tribal identification and genealogy, but also from the Islamic point of view. The highest Quraish tribe at that time was the Banu Umayya. And the most outstanding personage in that tribe was Abu Sufyaan bin Harb. Yet, the harms he had inflicted on the Muslims during the Uhud War had not yet been totally forgotten. He had already become a true and staunch Muslim. But the other Muslims could not fully trust him, yet. Consequently, no one could be placed before Rasulullah's (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) faithful companion

in the cave, who had become a Muslim earliest and caused others to become Muslims, too, and who had been appointed (by Rasullulah) as the Imaam (to conduct public prayers). It was certain that everyone would vote for him. In addition, since the normal procedure was for all Sahaba to come together and elect the Khalifa, the Ansar's attempt for an election among themselves could cause a commotion. Thus, Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu Ta'ala anhu) forestalled this danger and saved Muslims from a grave tumult. THE REASONS FOR SAYYIDUNA ALI'S (RADI ALLAHU ANHU) ABSENCE FROM THE ELECTION MAWLANA UTHMAN BIN NASSIR EFFENDI (alaihir rahmah), in his book, "TAZKIYYA-I-AHLE-BAYT," further explains: During these events Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) was at his wife, Sayyiduna Fathima's (radi Allahu anha) home. Sayyiduna Zubair, who was Sayyiduna Abu Bakr Siddique's son-in-law, Sayyiduna Miqdad, Sayyiduna Salman, Sayyiduna Abu Dharr and Sayyiduna Ammar bin Yasser (radi Allahu anhum ajma'in) were there, too. Their Ijtihad concurred with that of the third group. So Sayyiduna Abbas (radi Allahu anhu) came to Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) and held out his hand in homage to him. But, the latter had heard that Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) had become Khalifa; he, therefore, refused the offer. Abu Sufyaan (radi Allahu anhu) said, "Hold out your hand and I shall pay homage to you. I shall fill everywhere with cavalrymen and infantrymen if you want me to." Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) refused the notion, saying, "O Abu Sufyaan! Do you want to cause faction among the Islamic nation?" As it is seen, both Sayyiduna Abu Bakr Siddique and Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhuma) were sensitive about a probable instigation or controversy among the Muslims. At first, Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) was somewhat sorry because he had not been called to the election held under Sakifa's brushwood shelter. As it is explained in the book "Musamarat", by Muhyiddin-i-Arabi, and in the book "Daw us-sabah", by Hamid bin Ali Imadi [1175 A.D.1757], Abu Ubayda (radi Allahu anhu) came to the house where Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) was. He told him about all the statements that he had heard from Sayyiduna Abu Bakr and Sayyiduna Umar (radi Allahu anhuma). [These statements, very long and effective, are quoted in "Qisas-ul-Ambiya"]. Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) listened. The

statements were so impressive that he felt as if he had been penetrated to the marrow. He said, "Abu Ubaida! My sitting in the nook in a house is not intended to become Khalifa or to protest against the Emr-i-maruf or to castigate a Muslim. Separation from the Messenger of Allah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) has shocked me out of my senses." The following morning he went to the Masjid-i-Shareef. Walking past all the others, he went near Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu), paid homage and sat down. The Khalifa said to him, "You are blessed and honoured to us. When you are angry, you fear Allah. And when you are happy, you thank Him. How lucky for the person who will not demand any more than a position bestowed on him by Allah. I did not want to be Khalifa. I had to accept it lest there should arise a fitna (instigation, mischief). There is no resting for me in this duty. A heavy burden has been imposed on me. I do not have the strength to carry it. May Allah give me strength! Allahu Ta'ala has taken this burden off from your back. We need you. We are aware of your superior qualities." Sayyiduna Ali and Sayyiduna Zubair (radi Allahu anhuma) said that Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) was more suitable than anyone else for the Caliphate. They said they had been sorry for not having been informed about the election beforehand, and they apologised for this. The Khalifa accepted their apology. Then, Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) asked for permission and stood up. Sayyiduna Umar (radi Allahu anhu) very kindly saw him off. As Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) left, he said, "My being so late to come here was not intended to oppose (Abu Bakr as) the Khalifa. And my coming here now is not out of fear." All the Hashimis followed Sayyiduna Ali's (radi Allahu anhu) example and paid homage. Thus, a unanimity was realised. Both Sayyiduna Abu Bakr and Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhma) managed very vigilant and wise performances throughout the Caliphate election. Sayyiduna Ali's (radi Allahu anhu) not being called to the meeting under Sayyiduna Sakifa's (radi Allahu anhu) brushwood shelter was a fortunate event. Had he been there that day, the discussions between the Ansar and the Muhajirs would have been doubled with the joining of the Hashimis, which in turn would have made things more complicated. Differences of Ijtihads pertaining to the Caliphate election are not for us to discuss or comment on. They are the best Muslims. Each and every one of them is a star guiding to salvation. It is from them that the meaning of the Quran al-Kareem was acquired. It is through them that hundreds of thousands of Hadith Shareefs

were heard. And it is via them that the commandments and prohibitions of Allahu Ta'ala were learned. It would not be worthy of us to attempt to use the teachings we obtained from them as criteria for assessing their behaviours. Yes, erring is a human attribute. Mujtahids will err, too. Yet a Mujtahid will be rewarded with Thawaab anyway; ten times for not erring, and one reward if he errs. Each and every one of the Ashaab-i-Kiraam is a pillar of Islam. Differences among them were based on Ijtihad. They knew one another's values even when they criticised one another. If Sayyiduna Zubair (radi Allahu anhu) had preferred his personal considerations to his religious conceptions, he would not have disagreed with Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu), his fatherin-law. Sayyiduna Umar (radi Allahu anhu) was the most eager supporter of Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) in the Caliphate election. On the other hand, he, again, was the person who cherished and praised Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) the most. One day, Sayyiduna Umar (radi Allahu anhu) asked Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) a question. The latter answered the question. Upon this he said, "I entrust myself in Allah's protection from confronting a difficult question in Sayyiduna Ali's (radi Allahu anhu) absence." Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) used to say, "After Rasulullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), the most useful people in this Ummat are Sayyiduna Abu Bakr and Sayyiduna Umar (radi Allahu Ta'ala alaihim ajma'in)." A month later Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) mounted the mimbar and said, "I want to resign from the office of Caliphate. If you expect to see me following precisely the same way taken by the Messenger (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), this is impossible. For the devil could not approach him. In addition, he would be revealed the Wahy from Heaven." Could the hearts of such noble persons harbour the ambitions for rank and positions? Could any tongue speak ill of them? Actually, Sayyiduna Fathima-tuz-Zohra (radi Allahu anha) was so deeply distressed with the bereavement of her father's (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) death that she could not go out. Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) also mostly stayed at home to keep her company in her bereavement; therefore, he could

not frequently visit the Khalifa's Sohbat. However, after Sayyiduna Fathima's (radi Allahu anha) passing away, he paid homage again. He would often enter the Khalifa's presence, help him and make suggestions. As will be concluded from the above mentioned information which we have derived from "Qisas-ul-Ambiya", the Shi'ite allegation that Sayyiduna Ali and six other Sahabis did not pay homage to Sayyiduna Abu Bakr, (radi Allahu anhum ajma'in) is ungrounded. To stand against the unanimity of the Ashaab-i-Kiraam by not accepting Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (as the Khalifa) and to make immoderate statements in this subject would only have been incompatible with Islam. It would also mean to disobey Rasullulah's (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) command to his Sahaba: "Be in unity and avoid controversies." To say that Sayyiduna Ali and six other Sahabis and Fathimatuz-Zohra, the highest of women, (radi Allahu anhum ajma'in) did not carry out this command and disobeyed Islam would mean, let alone loving them, to controvert and belittle those great religious leaders. The controversy imputed to them is so grave that it has inflicted a fatal wound in Islam and caused millions of Muslims to deviate from the right way till the end of the world. The harms done to Islam and the bloodbaths of millions of Muslims perpetrated by those who dissented from the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah by reading the lies and slanders fabricated by the Hurufis (a Sect), are the causes of Islam's status quo. The harms which groups named Ahmadi and Qadiyani inflicted on Muslims are in the open. Could a wise and reasonable person with the light of Islam and a love of Imaan in his heart say that Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) was the cause of this great malice? SAYYIDUNA ALI (RADI ALLAHU ANHU) WILLINGLY ACCEPTED SAYYIDUNA ABU BAKR SIDDIQUE (RADI ALLAHU ANHU) AS THE CALIPH The Shias say that as Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) was busy with the preparations for the funeral of Sayyiduna Rasulullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), the three Khalifas convened most of the Sahaba and made Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) the Khalifa. Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) heard about this, but he thought that it would be futile to fight because he had a few men and he did not want the good people to die. The Shias say that that in some instances Sayyiduna Rasulullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) did not fight with the Kuffar, and that even Almighty Allah did not punish His enemies, so for Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) not fighting with Sayyiduna Abu Bakr Siddique (radi Allahu anhu) was correct. This is what

the Shias believe. It is our Sunni Belief that: By Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) not fighting Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) and obeying him, shows that Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) was the rightly-guided Khalifa. This fact cannot be refuted or denied by making a comparison of it to Rasullulah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallaam) not fighting against the disbelievers or the Quraish or Almighty Allah delaying the killing of His enemies such as Pharaoh, Sheddad and Nimrod. Almighty Allah and Rasullulah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) always reproved these enemies. They stated that these enemies were always evil and base. How can those people be examples for this case? Where is the similarity? The Shias, seeing that it would be futile to deny the fact that there are numerous evidence and reports stating that Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) accepted Sayyiduna Abu Bakr's (radi Allahu anhu) caliphate, changed their course and say that Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) accepted it unwillingly in order to act toward the situation. They cannot find a better way to prove that Sayyiduna Abu Bakr's (radi Allahu anhu) caliphate was unjust. They cannot find another way to resolve the dilemma they have driven themselves into. We shall once again prove from most reliable sources that it would be impossible to degrade Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) to the contemptible state of having committed a wrong deed in order to act toward the situation because of the overpowering conditions. When Sayyiduna Rasullulah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) passed away, the Ashaab-i-Kiraam (radi Allahu anhum ajma'in) set about the election of the Khalifa before beginning the procedures of funeral. They considered it their primary duty to find the leader or president for the believers. When the people heard that Sayyiduna Rasulullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) passed away, they became so sad that they were at a loss as to what to do. Somebody was needed to bandage this very serious wound of the people and to diminish the severe pain. Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu), in a serene manner, gathered the Ashaab-i-Kiraam (radi Allahu anhum ajma'in) and said aloud: "O thou, the blessed companions of the Prophet! If anyone here is worshipping Muhammad (sallal laahu alaihi waslalm), let him know that he is dead. And whoever is worshipping Allahu Ta'ala should know that He is always Alive. He will never die!" The rest of his speech was equally effective. When he heard that the Ansar had come together in order to elect the Khalifa

from among themselves, he went to their meeting place taking Sayyiduna Abu Ubayda (radi Allahu anhu) and Sayyiduna Umar (radi Allahu anhu) along. He said to them, "I have heard that you have been having elections to perform and execute the Commandments of Allah Ta'ala. Think and search! The Khalifa is to be from the Quraish (tribe)." Then pointing to Sayyiduna Abu Ubayda and Sayyiduna Umar (radi Allahu anhuma), he added, "Elect one of these people." Upon this, Sayyiduna Umar (radi Allahu anhu) said, "You are the Khalifa, O Abu Bakr," holding out his hand to him. All the Ansar umanimously agreed to this caliphate. The following day he went to the mosque and mounted the mimbar. He looked at the Jamaat (Muslims) and saw that Sayyiduna Zubair bin Awwam (radi Allahu anhu) was not among them. He sent for him. When Sayyiduna Zubair (radi Allahu anhu) came he asked him, "Do you have anything against the unanimity of the Muslims?" Sayyiduna Zubair (radi Allahu anhu) said, "O the Khalifa of the Messenger! I have nothing against it," and he held out his hand in submission. The Khalifa looked around once again. When he did not see Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu), he sent for him. When Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) came, he asked him, "Do you want to be opposed to the unanimity of the Muslims?" Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) too held out his hand in submission and said, "O the Khalifa of the Messenger! I am not opposed." Sayyiduna Zubair and Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhuma) apologised for being late to accept the Khalifa. They said, "We were sorry because we had not been informed of the caliphate election. We know very well that no one among us would be more rightful to the office of caliphate than Abu Bakr is. For he has been honoured with being (the Prophet's) companion in the cave. We are very well aware of his honour and his superiority. Rasullulah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) chose him among us to be the Imam to conduct the Namaaz." The great Imam, IMAM MUHAMMAD SHAFI'I (alaihir rahmah) [150-204 (C.E.819)] states: "When Rasullulah (sallal laahui alaihi wasallam) passed away, the Ashaab-iKiraam considered and searched, and finally decided that no one on earth could be superior to Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu). They unanimously made him the Khalifa. The Ashaab-i-Kiraam (radi Allahu anhum ajma'in) unanimously wanted to make one of the following (three) people the Khalifa: Sayyiduna Abu Bakr, Sayyiduna Ali and Sayyiduna Abbas (radi

Allahu anhum ajma'in). Sayyiduna Ali and Sayyiduna Abbas (radi Allahu anhuma) said nothing against the caliphate of Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu). They both accepted the caliphate of Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu). Thus, Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) was unanimously elected as the Khalifa. "If Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) had not been the rightful Khalifa, Sayyiduna Ali and Sayyiduna Abbas (radi Allahu anhuma) would have opposed it and demanded their rights. As a matter of fact, (later) Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) did not accept the caliphate of Sayyiduna Mu'awiyya (radi Allahu anhu) because he did not consider it rightful. Although Sayyiduna Mu'awiyya's (radi Allahu anhu) army was greater than his, he insisted on his due. Many people lost their lives. On the other hand, it would have been much easier for him to oppose Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu), and he would have been elected as the Khalifa. For that time was closer to the time of Rasullulah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) and people were more inclined to find out (and do) what was right. "Furthermore, Sayyiduna Abbas (radi Allahu anhu) offered Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) to be the Khalifa, yet he refused it. If he considered himself to be more rightful, he would have accepted it. Indeed, Sayyiduna Zubair (radi Allahu anhu) and all the sons of Hashim, with all their great fame and bravery, and many other Sahabis were with Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu). This I'jma (unanimity) would suffice to prove the fact that Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) was the rightful Khalifa. The fact that there is not a single commandment or even an implication to contradict this, emphasizes the state of rightfulness. In fact, according to the majority of the scholars, the I'jma-i-ummat, that is the unanimity of the Ashaab, is more dependable than a commandment which is not mash-hur (narrated by all scholars unanimously). For something on which there was I'jma (unanimity of the Ashaab) is certainly true. A commandment which is not mash-hur, on the other hand, is supposed to be true. "We would like to add at this point that if there are implications or even commandments advising that Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) should be the (first) Khalifa, the profoundly learned Ulema of Tafsir and Hadith should have reported them. It is true that there are no such commandments according to the majority of the profound scholars of the Ahle Sunna. This same statement shows that others do not have the right, either. Hence, it

becomes obvious that Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) became the Khalifa rightfully by the unanimous vote (of the Sahaba) and Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) cannot be said to have acted toward the situation, unwilling as he was. If the Sahaba-i-Kiraam had been the kind of people who would not have accepted the truth, then (the probability of Sayyiduna Ali's) having acted toward the situation might be considered. How could Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) ever be reproached with having abdicated a right in order to handle people honoured with the Hadith Shareef, 'The best of times is my time.'"

fATAWA AGAINsT THE sHIAs

ABOUT THOSE WHO CURSE THE THREE KHALIFAS IMAM-I-RABBANI, SHAIKH AHMAD SIRHINDI MUJADDID ALF THANI (alaihir rahmah), in his famous book, "RADD -E-RAWAAFID", says:' It is disbelief to curse the Shaikhayn (Sayyiduna Abu Bakr and Sayyiduna Umar) - radi Allahu Ta'ala anhuma. The Hadith Shareefs show that it is disbelief. It is declared, as follows, in a Hadith Shareef reported by Tabarani [Suleyman bin Ahmad, 260-360 (C.E. 941), in Isfahan] and by Hakim [Muhammad bin Abdullah, 321-405 (C.E.1014), in Nishapur]: "Allahu Ta'ala has chosen me. And He has chosen the best ones of mankind as my Ashaab (Companions). From among my Ashaab, He has selected viziers, assistants, and relatives for me. If a person curses them, may Allah Ta'ala and angels and human beings curse him! Allah Ta'ala will not accept the Fardh or Sunnat worships of those persons who curse them." A Hadith Shareef reported by the Hadith scholar, Ali bin Umar Daraqutni, declares: "After me, some people will appear. If you meet them, kill them! For they are polytheists (disbelievers)." Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) asked, "What is their sign?" He (Rasoolullah - sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) declared, "They will make an excessive display of attachment to you. They will say about you what you do not have. They will censure the religions superiors coming before them." In the same book, he (Rasoolullah - sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) declared, "These people censure Abu Bakr and Umar (radi Allahu anhum ajma'in). They swear at them. May Allahu Ta'ala and angels and all human beings

curse those who swear at my Ashaab." There are very many similar Hadith Shareefs, and since most of them are well-known, it is unnecessary to quote them here. Cursing the Shaikhayn means enmity towards them. And enmity towards them, in its turn, is disbelief. For it is declared in a Hadith Shareef, "Enmity towards them is enmity towards me. To hurt them means to hurt me. And to hurt me is to torment Allahu Ta'ala."It is declared in a Hadith Shareef reported by Hassan ibni Asakir [499-571, in Damascus], "It is Imaan to love Abu Bakr and Umar (radi Allahu anhuma). Enmity towards them if Kufr (disbelief)." It is declared in a Hadith Shareef, "If a person says to a Believer something which states that he is a disbeliever, (If he says, for instance,`O you the enemy of Allahu Ta'ala!'), he himself becomes a disbeliever." Then a person who calls the Shaikhayn disbelievers or considers them to be disbelievers will become a disbeliever himself. We know for certain that Sayyiduna Abu Bakr and Sayyiduna Umar (radi Allahu anhuma) are Believers. They are not enemies of Allahu Ta'ala. They have been blessed with the good news (that they shall attain) Paradise. Then, a person who calls them disbelievers will become a disbeliever. It is true that the Hadith Shareef quoted above is reported by only one person. Yet, it shows that a person who calls a Believer a disbeliever will become a disbeliever. Nevertheless, a person who denies this will not become a disbeliever. Abu Zur'a Razi, a great contemporary scholar, states, "If a person vituperates one of Rasoolullah's (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) Ashaab, he is a Zindiq. For Quran al-Kareem is certainly true. Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) certainly tells the truth. The information we have been receiving from them is certainly true. All this information praise, laud the Ashab-i-Kiraam. To speak ill of them means to deny the Quran al-Kareem and the Hadith Shareefs. And this, in its turn, is blasphemy, heresy, and abberation." Sehl bin Abdullah Tusturi [200-283 (C.E. 896), in Basra] states, "A person who does not esteem the Ashaab-i-kiram has not had Imaan in Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam)."Abdullah bin Mubarak [116-181 (C.E. 797), in Iraq] was asked, "Which person is higher - Muawiyyah, or Umar bin Abd-ulAziz?" He replied, "The dust that entered the nose of Muawiyyah's [d.60 (C.E. 680), when he was 79 years old] horse as he escorted Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), is as many times higher than Umar bin Abd-

ul-Aziz." Thus, he informed that no degree of highness could reach the level attained by being in Rasoolullah's (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) Sohbat and seeing his blessed face. [Umar bin Abd-ul-Aziz, the 8th Umayyad Khalifa, was profoundly learned and an extremely pious person. He was martyred in the year 101, when he was 41 years old. He bought Malatya from the Byzantine Greeks in return for a thousand slaves]. This kind of superiority, which is the sheer result of Sohbat with the exclusion of all other personal virtues is common in all the Ashaab-i-Kiraam. When the other types of virtues are added to this superiority; for instance, a Sahabi who made Jihad with Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), and who taught the Believers coming after him what he had learned from him, and who devoted his property for his sake, must be even more superior, higher. There is no doubt that the (first) two Khalifas were among the higher ones of the Ashaab-iKiraam. They were even the highest ones. Then, it would be disbelief to attribute the slightest inferiority to the Shaikhayn, nonetheless for calling them disbelievers. It would mean blasphemy, aberration. It is stated as follows in the book "Muhit", written by Shams-ul-A'imma, Muhammad bin Ahmad Serahsi [483 (C.E.1090), in Turkistan]: "It is not permissible to perform Namaaz behind an Imaam (who is notorious for his) vituperating the Shaikhayn. For that person denies the fact that Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) was the Khalifa. On the other hand, the fact that he (Abu Bakr) was rightfully elected the Khalifa has been acknowledged unanimously by all the Ashaab-i-Kiraam." It is stated as follows in the book of fatwa named "Hulasa," written by Tahir bin Ahmad Bukhari: "If a person denies the Caliphate of Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu), he becomes a disbeliever. It is Makruh (not liked by Rasoolullah, though not forbidden) to perform the Namaaz conducted by a bid'at holder. If the bid'at he holds is so bad as to cause disbelief, the Namaaz conducted by him will not be Sahih (accepted). If it is not so bad as disbelief the Namaaz will be Sahih but Makruh. It is almost equally true that a person who denies the Caliphate of Sayyiduna Umar (radi Allahu anhu) will become a disbeliever." In the light of the fact that a person who denies their Caliphates will become a disbeliever, one should imagine the destiny awaiting those people who

vilify and curse them. As it is seen, to call such eccentricities disbelief is exactly concordant with the Hadith Shareefs and the statements made by the Islamic Ulama. When some of the Ahl As-sunna scholars (rahmatullahi Ta'ala alaihim ajma'in) said that these people should not be called disbelievers, they meant those who were not excessive in their eccentricities. Their statements are therefore in agreement with the Hadith Shareefs and the statements of the (other Islamic) Ulama. IMAM AHMED RAZA'S (ALAIHIR RAHMAH) FATAWA ON HAVING CONTACT WITH SHIA INDIVIDUALS A Translation of the Fatawa - Mas'ala No. 87, page 179 of "Ahkaam-eShariat" Question : What advice do the Ulema of Deen have to offer to the members of the Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat (Sunnis) regarding their relationship with the Shias (Rawafiz), as to whether they should maintain a friendly association with Shias; or eat and drink with Shias; and whether the maintaining of trade relationship with Shias is permissable? Furthermore, what is the Shar'an ruling against these Sunnis that have such relationships with Shias? Do such Sunnis fall out of the folds of the Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat? (Should such Sunnis be excluded from the Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat?) And should the rest of the Sunni Muslims severe all religious and social ties with the Sunni Muslim that associates with Shias? Answer: Shias (Rawafiz) have commonly been known throughout the ages as apostates (Murtadd) as it has been clearly outlined in "Raddur Rufaza" (A Fatwa published in the form of a booklet by A'la Hadrat). It is not Halaal to have any form of contact or maintain any type of relationship with them in any manner that you would normally have with a fellow Muslim. It is Haraam to maintain any form of social contact with them; accord them in any form of social etiquette; greet them (make Salaam to them); and even speak to them. Almighty Allah says in the Holy Quran, Surah 6, Verse 68 (Surah An'aam): "If Satan ever makes thee forget, then after reflection, sit not thou in the company of those who do wrong."

Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) has stated in a Hadith that, "Shortly there will appear a group of people (in the Ummah) whose name would be synonymous with evil; they will be known as Raavzi (meaning Heretics or Shias). They will revile the virtuous predecessors (Salf-oSaleheen); and they will not attend the Jumu'a Salaah, and they will not adhere to the Jamaat (mainstream body of Muslims). Neither sit in their company not join them for meals, or drink water with them. Do not intermarry with them or visit them when they are sick. Do not attend the funerals of their dead; and neither join them in the Salaatul Janazah nor perform the Salaatul Janazah for their deceased." Those Sunni Muslims who freely intermingle socially with the Shias or Raavzis, if they have not already become Shias themselves, are extreme transgressors (of the Shariat). Sunnis are advised to severe social ties with those who freely intermingle with Raavzis or Shias. Wallahu Tha'ala A'alum. A REQUEST TO THE MUSLIM YOUTH The Muslim youth, in their eagerness to see the downfall of the enemies of Islam and to see the rise of Islamic Power worldwide, have become restless. In their love for Islam, they are easily drawn to the Iranian revolution and Mr. Khomeini. After becoming aware of Shia'ite beliefs, the new generation of Muslims should keep far away from the LOST (GUMRAH) sect in order to protect their Imaan. Having read the above brief account of how Shia'ism differs with true Islam, Muslims must seriously reflect upon the following questions:(a). Would you consider reading Salaah behind an Imaam who has totally rejected Rasoolullah's (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) instructions on Imaan and who believes that the 12 Imaams have greater status than Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam)? (b). Would you sacrifice the status and honour of Muslim women being used as objects for the gratification of man's carnal desires through sexual means, with the possible result of illegitimate children being conceived, all in the name of and Haraam practice of MUTAH (Temporary Marriage)? (c). Would you like your Salaatul Janaazah to be performed by one who blatantly disregards the pristine purity of the Holy Quran, a Divine Book

which Almighty Allah Himself has promised to protect? We wish to also remind our readers that all the quotations found in this book can be verified from its original sources. Regarding this sect, the Muslim Revivalist (Mujaddid) of the 14th Century, A'LA Hadrat, ASH SHAH IMAM AHMED RAZA AL-QADERI (ALAIHIR RAHMAH) has stated in his fatawah that this sect, i.e. SHIA and RAWAFIZ, are disassociated from the boundary of Islam (Millat-e-Islamia) and they are regarded as APOSTATES. (FATAWAH RAZVEEIAH, VOL. 6, PAGE 25) Let us make Dua that Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala protects us from the insinuations and mischievous designs of our enemies. May He grant us the power and vision so that the Lamp of Righteousness may not grow dim, through our vigilance and foresight. May the Nisbah we bear to the Holy Prophet Muhammad (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) and the Great Deen of Islam may grow stronger and stronger every day. Ameen. Allahumma Ameen.

fINAL WORd
Our African Muslim brothers ought to rise up against Shia'ism in the townships. The first African Muslim in Islam was Sayyiduna Bilal (radi Allahu anhu) who was not only a brave soldier, but also one who was subject to the harshest persecution for accepting Islam. The greatest amongst the Companions of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) was Sayyiduna Abu Bakr Siddique (radi Allahu anhu) who purchased Sayyiduna Bilal (radi Allahu anhu) as a slave and freed him to please Almighty Allah and His Rasool (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). The Shias have branded this great personality an apostate and accursed one. (Allah forbid) The great African Continent is full of Sunni Muslims. The Irani Shias have now embarked on a campaign to bribe the poorer African Muslims to corrupt their beliefs and convert them to Shias. This is the message of Sheik Shazili on the ocassion of Yaum-e-Siddique Akbar. Sheik Shazili who is deeply involved in Islamic Propagation work in the African townships, has pointed out that African townships in the Cape and the Transvaal have been specifically targeted by the Shias as areas for potential converts. The modus operandi of the Shias is to single out the sincere but poor members of the African Muslim Community and bribe them

with wealth to bring them into the ugly Kufr fold of Shia'ism. This state of affairs is certainly unacceptable to our Sunni Muslims and it provides a specific challenge to our Dawah workers on the field. In the past, there were no Shias in South Africa. After the Iranian Revolution and the 1994 South African elections, a flurry of activity emerged from the Shia propagation machine to spread this Kufr sect in South Africa. Wealth is outlayed blatantly to attract Sunni Muslims to the Shia fold and we have received unconfirmed reports that certain Sunni Ulema had accepted invitations from the Shias to attend their functions. The new South Africa has certainly allowed many new sects to emerge amongst the Muslims and the Iranian influence is another destructive force that awaits the unsuspecting Muslims in South Africa.It is now imperative for all Muslim Institutes to face the challenges of the Shia onslaught and present openly to the African Muslims the vile and Kufr beliefs of the Shia sect in the townships. Provisions must now be made to organise Siddique-eAkbar Day and Khulafaa-e-Rashideen Day in the townships on a large scale in an attempt to preserve the Imaan of the people whom the Shias are targeting. Iran's Islamic Revolution was supported with much zest and vigour mainly because it was seen as the opening of the doorway to much needed changes in the world. Sadly, this was not to be. After the dust has settled, realisation dawned that this was merely a dream which had not been fulfilled. Iran's claim to the title of an Islamic Republic was forfeited because it is essentially a Shia Republic. Moreover, the late Dr. Kalim Siddiqui, who was initially a great enthusiast of Iran's Revolution, later comprehended the gloomy reality and admitted to his change of hearts. Most readers and patrons of Dr. Kalim's writings were of the opinion that Dr. Kalim is unequivocally a champion of the Iranian movement. They are not aware of the developments that took place during the last stages of his life. Initially, Dr. Siddiqui devoted all his energy to Iran's struggle as he believed that it would give Islam a strong foothold on the international level. Furthermore, the force of Sunnism will be greatly strengthened. During Imam Khomeini's reign Dr. Kalim was rewarded with the respect and honour that he deserved. However, his recent tour to Teheran became a

torturous one. Fanatic Shias who saw Dr. Siddiqui's visit as a campaign to spread Sunnism felt greatly threatened by his presence. They felt that he was there to censure Shia'ism and challenge its teachings. They became extremely defensive and hostile towards him. In his agitation he responded, "I am not a fan of either your culture or your discourse. I am here only because of your alleged claims to be an Islamic Republic. Had I known the truth I would never have come." Milli Times International, Delhi, India (June 1996) Please study this narration: As narrated by Sayyiduna Jabir bin Abdullah (radi Allahu anhu): A villager came to Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) and asked, "O Ameer-ulMumineen! Is Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) in Paradise?" This question hurt Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) considerably. So he said, "I wish I had never come to the world. This statement has never been made by anyone else before, neither by Rasulullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) nor by any other Muslim after him. Abu Bakr Siddique (radi Allahu anhu) was always with the Messenger of Allah; he was his vizier and counsellor. He succeeded him as the Khalifa after his passing away. He who denies this fact will become a disbeliever. O villager! Sayyiduna Abu Bakr Siddique (radi Allahu anhu) sent for me towards his passing away. He said to me, 'O my darling brother! I am going to pass away soon. When I die, wash me with those blessed hands of yours with which you washed the Messenger of Allah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam)! Wrap me in my shroud and put me in my coffin! Take by corpse to the entrance of Hujra-i-sa'adat! Say unto Rasulullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam): Abu Bakr is at the door. He asks for permission to enter.' "When Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) passed away, I did whatever he had told me to do. When we put his coffin in front of the door of the Hujra-i-sa'adat and I asked for permission, we heard a voice saying, 'Bring the darling near the darling.' Therefore, we buried Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) besides the Messenger of Allah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam)." It is stated in a Hadith Shareef that Rasulullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) said: "Fear Allah as you talk about my Ashaab! Fear Allah lest you should

show any disrespect in a conversation about my Ashaab! After me, never have a bad opinion of them. He who loves them does so because he loves me. And he who bears hostility towards them is my enemy." A Dua that was made by Sayyiduna Imam Rabbani (rahmatullahi alaihi): "ILAHI! MAKE OUR DU'A AND SALAAM REACH YOU BELOVED PROPHET (SALLAL LAAHU ALAIHI WASALLAM) AND HIS AHLE BAYT (RADI ALLAHUM AJMA'IN), AND GIVE THEM KHAIR AND BARAKAH IN A MANNER AS YOU LIKE, AS MANY TIMES AS THE NUMBER OF YOUR CREATURES AND AS HEAVY AS YOUR ARSH. AMEEN. MAY HAMD BE TO ALLAH TA'ALA, AND MAY DUAS AND SALAAMS BE TO THE HOLY PROPHET MUHAMMAD (SALLAL LAAHU ALAIHI WASALLAM) TILL THE END OF THE WORLD! AMEEN."

"PROfEssOR" TAHIRUL QAdRI (Of PAKIsTAN):TAHIRUL QAdRI - PREsENT-dAY ENEMIEs Of IsLAM

Islamic Scholars of the rightly guided Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah, have written thousands of books which present the proper beliefs, commands and prohibitions of Islam. On the other hand, dangerous and short-sighted people have attacked Islam's bountiful and luminous Path. They have tried to lay false blame against the scholars of the Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat, and have attempted to change the pristine teachings of Islam, thereby, trying to deceive innocent Sunni Muslims. This struggle between Muslims and Heretics has taken place in every century, and it will continue till the end of the world. May Almighty Allah save us from the Heretics! In spite of this, it has been seen that men of religious authority in all Muslim countries at all times have worked tirelessly to uphold and defend the correct course of the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah. However, certain ignorant people, have not read or have not understood the books written by the illustrious Ahle Sunnat wal Jamaah scholars. Thus they insist on making baseless oral and written statements, which does nothing but betray their own ignorance and wretchedness against Muslims and Islam. Harmful separatist movements among Muslims attack books of the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah and continue to make accusations against the Ulema of

the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah and great men of Tasawwaf. (As proof of this, a video recording shows Tahirul Qadri calling Hazrat Allama Mufti Mohammed Akhtar Raza Khan Azhari as "a leader of the gangsters which attacked him" and addressing our local Sunni Ulema by derogatory terms). May Almighty Allah grant respect to the Ulema-e-Ahle Sunnah! Speaking in the name of "Islamic scholars" or "Professors" these enemies of Islam have tried to destroy Islam from within. They disguise themselves as Muslims and say that they want to make reforms in Islam, but infact their sole intention is to destroy Islam. They cooperate with the enemies of Islam - the West, the Zionist, the Jews and Christians - to demolish Islam. Ulema of the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah have challenged these enemies of Islam on numerous occasions. They have also written, whenever necessary, answers against them and protected the true Path of the Ahle Sunnah wa Jamaah. AIhamdulillah, the Ulema of the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaat have again been successful in exposing yet another "professor" campaigning, as a "staunch Sunni" and who falsely claims that "there is a crying need for Islam to he progressive". Progressive according to whose standards? He also labels the Muslims of South Africa as "FANATICS", "EXREMISTS" and "FUNDAMENTALIST'. Who really uses these defamatory accusations against the Muslim Ummah? Nobody else but the enemies of Islam and the Muslims! We entreat Almighty Allah that by studying this document carefully with common sense and pure conscience, our valuable Sunni Muslims will judge it fairly and stick together on the right and true Path of the Ahle Sunnah Wal Jamaah. In this way only, can we escape eternal doom. Every quotation in this document pertaining to the corrupt anti-Islamic beliefs of Tahirul Qadri is authentic and can be substantiated by proof.

TAHIRUL QAdRI - BACKGROUNd Of EVENTs IN sOUTH AfRICA

What were the events surrounding the issue of Tahirul Qadri? Why was there so much of opposttion from the Ulema-Ahle Sunnah? Could this issue have been avoided or resolved? What are the points of dispute that the Ulema-eAhle Sunnah have against Tahirul Qadri? Is this man a Sunni? These and many other questions will be discussed in this treatise. We will begin by first giving you some background information of events. In 1992, when it was learnt that a prominent Sunni family, supported by certain Molvis and individuals, were deciding to bring Professor Tahirul Qadri to South Africa, a Sunni United Conference was held on the 9th of November 1992 at the Masjid-NooreMustafa in Chatsworth, Durban. An overwhelming majority of Sunni Ulema present ACCEPTED a resolution, which highlighted that Tahirul Qadri is misled and was misleading others. The resolution passed also stated that Tahirul Qadri's visit was unwelcome to South Africa because of his history in causing disunity in countries that he visited. Sheikh-ul-Hadith MUFTI GHULAM SARWAR QADRI, an advisor to the Shariah Court of Pakistan, and also a very well respected personality among Sunnis, was also present at this meeting. HE PLAYED A VERY IMPORTANT ROLE BY SUBMITTING FIRSTHAND EVIDENCES OF TAHIRUL QADRI'S CORRUPT BELIEFS AND MISCHIEVOUS TEACHINGS. (In 1988, this same Mufti Ghulam Sarwar Al Qadri challenged and struck a defeating blow to the Ahmadis in Cape Town). Subsequent to this significant meeting, the Ulema-Ahle Sunnah, both locally and internationally, advised this family not to invite this controversial "professor" to South Africa, as this will certainly polarise the Sunni community of this country. This issue continued to be a matter of great concern among the Ulema-e-Ahle Sunnah. THIS PROMINENT SUNNI FAMILY AND THEIR SUPPORTERS WERE GIVEN AMPLE WARNINGS AND PROOFS OF TAHIRUL QADRI'S CORRUPT BELIEFS AND MISCHIEVOUS TEACHINGS, BUT THEY DID NOT PAY ANY HEED TO THESE WARNINGS. We were certain that these legitimate grievances and objections ventilated by not only the local Ulema-e-Ahle Sunnah, but the vast majority of the Ulema of international calibre from the indo-Pak subcontinent would create some measure of impact on this family on their decision to import this "FitnahTaahiriyah" from Pakistan. However, it became abundantly obvious that this family ARROGANTLY BRUSHED ASIDE AND ENTIRELY IGNORED THE GENUINE AND PASSIONATE PLEAS AND APPEALS FROM THE VOICES OF REASON. They defiantly went ahead and imported this Fitnah to this country. PROFESSOR'S ARRIVAL IN SOUTH AFRICA ON THE 2ND OF APRIL 1993

HERALDED AN ERA OF ANIMOSITY AND DISUNITY in the Beloved Ummah of Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) in South Africa. Due to this state of affairs, Hazrat Allama Mufti Mohammed Akhtar Raza Khan Azhari AI-Qaderi, the President of the All India Sunni Jamiatul Ulema and the Head Mufli of Central Darul Ifaah - Bareilly Shareef, and Muhaddith-e-Kabeer, Allama Zia-ul-Mustapha Al-Qaderi, Sheik-ul-Hadith and Principal of Jamia Amjadia Razawiyya, arrived in Durban (South Africa) to remove the doubts and misconceptions spun around Tahirul Qadri's controversial personality and to determine his claim to Sunniyat.

TAHIRUL QAdRI - THE dEBATE THAT NEVER TOOK PLACE

"Professor" was extremely arrogant with the local Ulema-e-Ahle Sunnah by employing delaying tactics and flimsy excuses. He was immensely reluctant to give the Sunni Ulema an audience. However, after many negotiations, AN AGREEMENT WAS SIGNED WITH TAHIRUL QADRI TO MEET FOR A DEBATE that was to he held on the 5th of April 1993, at the famous Grey Street Jumma Masjid in Durban. Please note that THIS VENUE WAS CHOSEN BY THE PROFESSOR HIMSELF. The Ulema-Ahle-Sunnah did not have a say or choice in deciding the venue. To this effect, hand-written documentary evidences of the "Professor" are available. Hazrat Allama Zia-ul-Mustapha was to be the debater and Hazrat Allama Mufli Mohammed Akhtar Raza Khan Azhari was to oversee the debate. Both parties met on the night of the debate. The distinguished overseas Sunni Ulema and Tahirul Qadri were introduced to the crowd of about 2000 Muslims. A certain Molvi, an enthusiastic supporter of Tahirul Qadri, who stood up on behalf of him, caused a great commotion when he addressed the crowd. Greater confusion was created when a small number of Tahirul Qadri's supporters began calling for a lecture and not a debate. Tahirul Qadri then stood up and addressed the crowd. The Sunnis, who had come specifically to listen to the debate, could not restrain themselves. Tempers began flaring when they realised that TAHIRUL QADRI WAS NOT GOING TO ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE WHICH HE HAD ALREADY GIVEN IN WRITlNG. He did not present himself at the Jumma Masjid that night to

answer any questions in the form of a debate, but instead to cause more confusion. The Muslim public is not aware of the shrewdness he exercised on that night "Professor" very well knew that he could never have won a debate with one of the most talented and popular Scholars of Islam, that is Muhaddith-Kabeer, Allama Zia-ul-Mustapha as he would have certainly been exposed. Instead of immediately following the procedures of the debate, he cunningly whispered to the then Imaam of the mosque: "Ask the public whether they want a lecture or debate". The Imaam then took the mike and repeated the words of the "professor". As soon as he made this announcement, confusion reigned. At this point we would like to highlight an important fact On Tuesday, the 6th of April 1993, a day after the Jumma Masjid incident, the "Professor," in a private gathering at the residence of a Sunni family, video recorded an interview. In that interview the "Professor" repeatedly claims that the Imaam of the Masjid asked the audience if they wanted a lecture or debate and that the majority shouted, "Lecture! Lecture!" When the Imaam was contacted to verify this fact, he said: "Professor is telling a lie. He is the one who asked me to make that announcement. I did not do this on my own accord". Any sensible person present in the Masjid that night will verify that only after this announcement was made did confusion reign. This of course suited "professor" perfectly. Then too, the Ulema-e-Ahle Sunnah appealed for calm and restrain If the "professor" was a sincere and righteous preacher of truth he would have stood in that Masjid like a devout Muslim and scholastically cleared all doubts and misunderstandings about his beliefs. Instead, be found it befitting to be hurriedly escorted (infact, he jumped over the masjid wall!) out of the Masjid. A video recording of the incident is evident that the Sunni Ulema constantly tried to calm the people on the night. THE IMMENSE TRAGEDY IS THAT THE PROPOSED DEBATE DID NOT TAKE PLACE. It was our intention to expose this fraudulent "professor". Yet, he was too terrified of the consequences of being exposed in public as a "fake". He obviously had no intention of challenging the Ulema-e-Ahle Sunah. It is safe to say that he had "cold-feet".

The organisers of his visit and many of his ignorant supporters, and a few local "Ulema", dumbfounded by the fierce objections and unity of the Sunni public practically ran out of the masjid. This entire episode happened very quickly. The crowds then quickly settled and were addressed by our distinguished overseas Ulema. This peaceful sitting was again interrupted when certain persons, supporters of Tahirul Qadii, began causing a commotion. Outsiders, totally ignorant of what had transpired, walked in the masjid with a policeman. The Sunnis immediately reacted to this. Seeing that there was A PLANNED ATTEMPT BY A HANDFUL OF SUPPORTERS OF TAHIRUL QADRI AND THE ORGANISERS TO DISRUPT THE PEACEFUL GATHERING, it was decided to close the meeting. The Ulema-e-Ahle Sunnah left the masjid.

TAHIRUL QAdRI - TAHIRUL QAdRI's CORRUPT BELIEfs

Certain "half-baked" individuals and "intellectual pygmies," dressed up in the garb of "Molvis", have claimed that there are no valid accusations against Tahirul Qadri. They are saying that Sunnis have no proofs against Tahirul Qadri's beliefs. They are saying that the Ulema of the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah are causing open fitna. Ma' azallah!We want you, the Sunnis, to now use your common sense and judge for yourselves the beliefs of Tahirul Qadri. We have translated Urdu extracts from books written by Tahirul Qadri himself, and some of his corrupt anti-Sunni beliefs. We have commented only on a few of his beliefs, but a more in-depth explanation will follow in the next chapter. Here are his shocking revelations:BELIEF ONE "With all praise to Allah, all the Islamic schools of thought in the issues of beliefs do not possess any differences on basic fundamental beliefs, However, in minor subsidiary matters this difference is only as far as minor details, whose types and kinds are explanatory and detailed. It is due to this, that in missionary affairs to leave the areas of fundamental beliefs and solely become immersed in subsidiary and minor details, and on the basis of this, to make other schools of thought one's target of criticism is not fairness and wisdom". Reference : Firqah Parasti Ka Khaatimah Qu Kar Mumkin Heh, page 65.

What Tahirul Qadri is trying to say is that as far as the beliefs of the different groups (firqas) are concerned, they are only based on "subsidiary and minor details"! When Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) has said that it is these very same groups that will enter Jahannam, Tahirul Qadri says that to pick on the beliefs and teachings of Shias, Deobandis, Khaarajites and other groups is "not fairness and wisdom". When Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) has already passed a decision on these groups, do we need a misguided "professor" to tell us that these are small matters! May Allah save us from Tahirul Qadri's fitnah. BELIEF TWO "When the Creator of the Universe did not give the Prophet the authority that he appoint anything according to his wishes in the affairs of religion...". Reference: Firqah Parasti Ka Khaatimah Qu Kar Mumkin Heh, page 86 Does this "professor" realise the implication of his statement? As far as Tahirul Qadri is concerned, he says that Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) has no authority over any matter. What greater disrespect towards the Holy Prophet Muhammad (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) than this! This belief is akin to that of the Wahabi/Deobandi/Tablighi belief as stated in "Taqwiyatul Jmaan", page 41 by Molvi Ismail Dehlwi, wherein he says that "Whosoever's name is Muhammad or Ahmed has no authority over anything". BELIEF THREE "I do not only like performing Salaah behind the Wahabis and Shias but whenever I get the opportunity I perform Salaah behind them". Reference : Risaalah Deed Shoneed, Lahore, 19 April 1986, page 4 Immediately after this interview, which was recorded in the above magazine, Tahirul Qadri claimed to the Sunni Ulema of Hyderbad that he had never made this statement. The editor of the magazine has the cassette of this interview. Attempts are being made to obtain this cassette. BELIEF FOUR "I curse sectarianism. I do not belong to any sect. I am a representative of the Prophet's community". Reference: Risaalah Deed Shoneed, Lahore, 19 April

1986, page 4 In a video recording interview taped in Durban (South Africa), Tahirul Qadri, very emotionally, told his unsuspecting audience that he is a Sunni Hanafi. Yet, he holds a firm belief that he does not have an excessive devotion and adherence to any particular group. This "professor" has already cursed himself! BELIEF FIVE "In Salaah, to fold one's hand or to leave one's hand is not amongst the Wajibaadats of Islam. The important thing is Qiyaam. In the (position) of standing l am following (whoever the Imaam is). If the Imaam makes Qiyaam, Sajdah, Qadah or Salaam then the Muqtadi should do the same. At this point, it is not necessary that the Imaam leaves his hand, and the Muqtadi folds his hands and performs the Salaah or leaves his hand". Reference: Nawaa-e-Waqt Magazine, 19 December 1986. BELIEF SIX "I am not working for the loftiness of Hanafiyat or for the school of the Ahle Sunnat". Reference : Nawaa-e-Waqt Magazine, 19 December 1986, page 4. If Tahirul Qadri is not working for the school of the Ahle Sunnah, then what is he really working for? The Ahle Sunnah Wa Jammah is the only right group that have been promised Jannah. Tahirul Qadri is not working towards Jannah, need we say towards which place he is heading for! BELIEF SEVEN "If a person claims that a certain person who has read the Kalimah is a Munafiq and Kaafir, if this is not similar to sitting on the Throne of Allah and His Prophet, then what is?" Reference: Firqah Parasti Ka Khaatimah Qu Kar Mumkin Heh, page 72 BELIEF EIGHT "Allah and His Rasool did not issue any school of thought a permit to Jannah. If any person is involved in this conceit, that because he is involved in a certain

school of thought and is entitled to Jannat, then this is his vain thoughts and his personal fraud". Reference: Firqah Parasti Ka Khaatimah Qu Kar Mumkin Heh, page 54 BELIEF NINE "There should be such a religious institute which is above the constraining teachings of schools of thought so that a student of any school of thought may gain advantage from lessons in this free environment". Reference: Firqah Parasti Ka Khaatimah Qu Kar Mumkin Heh, page 91 BELIEF TEN "The clear victims among the worshippers of school of thought have been those people whose education and training have been (confined) to a special school of thought. After they become armed with religious education and they walk in the field of a life of action, then they make their own beliefs and thoughts and the propagation of this as their objectives". Reference: Firqah Parasti Ka Khaatimah Qu Kar Mumkin Heh, page 108 BELIEF ELEVEN "Bareillvi'at, Deobandi'at, Ahle Hadithi'at, Shia'at, and these titles (makes me) fearful". Reference: Firqah Parasti Ka Khaatimah Qu Kar Mumkin Heh, page 111 Tahirul Qadri cannot say that the book, "Firqah Parasti Ka Khaatimah Qu Kar Mumkin Heh" is not his work and not published under the banner of his organisation, "Minhaajul Quran". We have ample proof to show that this is his own writings! Sunnis must bear in mind that Shaitaan has always used religious frauds to put forward arguments, which are totally contrary to the Holy Quran and Sunnah. Tahirul Qadri wants Sunnis and all other groups to compromise or come to a settlement. We must remember that Shaitaan uses people to present arguments based on misconstrued (distorted) compromise. We should realise that this "total compromise" is nothing but the evil whisperings of Shaitaan. Almighty Allah has stated in the Holy Quran that "Shaitaan is an open enemy to you". An appeal is made to innocent Sunnis not to he deceived

by this compromise. We should bear in mind that this message of "total compromise" preached by Tahirul Qadri is even against the teachings of I'jma (Consensus). It should, therefore, be the priorities of Sunnis to refer to the learned Ulema of the Anle Sunnah Wa Jamaah if they are in doubt about Tahirul Qadri. O Muslims! Bear in mind that when a thief intends stealing from a house he first throws a stone. If there is no reaction from the occupants of the house, then the thief takes full advantage of the situation. This self-styled "thinker" and "scholar of Islam", Tahirul Qadri's, first stone on the house of Islam was on the issue of DIYAT or compensation for Blood-Money. Tahirul Qadri presented points totally contrary to the Ijma-e-Ummah (Consensus of the Ummah) on this issue. But, Al'hamdulillah, we wish to state that the occupants of the House of Islam were not sleeping. The foremost among the Ulema-e-Ahle-Sunnah who refuted this "professor's" corrupt teachings were, amongst others:1. Allama Mohammed Abdullali Qadri Ashrafi Barakaati who wrote "Awrat Ki Diy at". This book contains enough proof exposing the ignorance of Tahirul Qadri. 2. Hazrat Allama Ata Mohammed Saheb Bindiyaalwi. 3. Ghazali-e-Zamaa, Allama Sayed Ahmed Saeed Kazmi (radi Allahu anhu) 4. Allama Moulana Abu Dawood Mohammed Sadeck. He has written the book entitled "Khatreh Ki Ghanti" in which the true beliefs of the Taahiriyah group has been clearly exposed. 5. Allama Mufti Mehboob Raza Khan who wrote "Fitnah Taaiiriyah Ki Haqiqat". 6. Allama Mufti Ghulam Sarwar Al Qaadri who has written two in-depth volumes entitled "Professor Ka I' imi Wa Tahqeeqih Jaa' izah". Many other books have also been written by the Ulema-e-Ahle Sunnah exposing Tahirul Qadri's corrupt beliefs and teachings. We humbly supplicate in the Darbar of Almighty Allah that He reward these distinguished Ulema for having revealed this new and corrupt group.

TAHIRUL QAdRI - REfUTATION Of HIs BELIEfs

HIS CALL FOR COMPROMISE IS COMPARABLE TO KUFR Almighty Allah states in the Holy Quran: "And cover not truth with falsehood, nor conceal the truth when you know what it is." (2:42) From this verse we clearly come to understand that truth and falsehood can never be reconciled, just as Islam and Kufr cannot be reconciled. This has always been the belief from the time of Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam).Sayyiduna Rasoolullahs (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) command is very clear when he says: "Do not sit with the corrupt, do not drink with them and do not eat with them." Therefore, the message of compromise by Tahirul Qadri is against the very principles of Islam. Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) said: "My Ummah will be divided into 73 sects. One of them will enter Jannah, while the rest will enter Jahannam." When he was asked as to who the Ahle Jannah was, he replied: "Those with whom I and my Ashaab are in." We must bear in mind that the syllable "ma" in this Hadith clearly signifies Aqidah and the fundamental principles of action and "not minor subsidiary issues" as Tahirul Qadri claims. We must also bear in mind that two other Ahadith of Sayyidnna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) use the words "Jamaath" and "Sawad-e-Azam". It is because of this that the Ahle Sunnat Wa Jamaah has been termed "the major group". It is our Imaan that this is the Jannati group. Tahirul Qadri believes and says that NO GROUP has been given the permit to enter Jannat, while Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) assures us that only one group wlll enter Jannat. Is not Tahirul Qadri's teaching totally contrary to the Holy Ouran and Sunnah? One wonders whose words the followers of Tahirul Qadri.are going to accept! We wish to pose two very important questions to Tahirul Qadri and to his representatives in South Africa and elsewhere. Firstly, Tahirul Qadri, when you claim that no group has been given the permit to enter Jannah, then why is it that you persist in claiming to be a Sunni? (Proof of this can be seen from two video recordings in Durban)Secondly, Tahirul Qadri, you also claim to accept the decision of A'la Hazrat (radi Allahu anha) from his book, "Husaamul Haramain," in which the Ulema of the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah have justifiably branded certain Deobandi Molvis as Kaairs. Why brand

Deobandis only as Kaafirs when you believe that no group has been given permission to enter Jannah? You yourself have said that you cannot call anybody a Kaafir! O Sunnis! This man claims to be a scholar of lslam, but see how confused he is about his own Imaan. Tahirul Qadri claims to be a "lover" of A'la Hazrat, Imam Ahmed Raza Khan (radi Allahu anhu). In his lectures he says that he is a Sunni and a follower of A'la Hazrat (radi Allahu anhu). Why does he do this? There is a very simple explanation to all of this. He knows that every Sunni is a fervent admirer of Ala Hazrat (radi Allahu anhu). What easier way of luring or trapping the innocent Sunnis than to use the name of a great person who is beloved to them! We are fully aware of Tahirul Qadri's plots against Islam. He is so well trained as a master con-artist that when confronted by Sunnis, he claims to be a Sunni! When Deobandis and Shias corner him, he says that there is no problem in performing Salaah behind them. He even practices this! Perhaps he is practising, as described in the following Ouranic Verse: "When they meet those who believe, they say 'We believe', But when they are alone with the evil ones, they say 'We are really with you. We were only joking."' (2: 14) This is a perfect description befitting the founder of the Taahiriyah sect! As it is said in the English phrase: If the cap fits, wear it. It certainly fits the "professor". In the monthly magazine of Minhaajul Quran, 12 February (year not stated), many people from various schools of thought were invited by Tahirul Qadri. In this instance, Tahirul Qadri and these persons gave indications that it was important for members of various schools of thought to meet and discuss so that "misconceptions" can be removed. A question still hangs in the air. Was this really the reason for the meeting? Or was it merely a very diplomatic way of accepting and compromising with other groups? This "professor" claims to be a Sunni. He has full knowledge of all the Kufr statements made by the Deobandis and, in spite of this, says that compromise with them is still possible. He has also stated that whoever doubts the Kufr of certain Deobandi Molvis, they themselves are Kaafirs. Which Deobandi can truly admit that they regard certain of their leaders as Kaafirs? After knowing

this and knowing that the majority of Deobandis still consider those Deobandis as their leaders, even though a Kufr Fatawa has been issued against them, Tahirul Qadri still says that Muslims must compromise with them. We thank Almighty Allah for guiding us through His rightly-guided Ulema of the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah and not leading us to Kufr. Tahirul Qadri claims that he has never performed Salaah behind a Shia Imaam. According to a teacher, Sayyid Bakhtiar Hussain Subzwari, of a Shia madressa (Jaamiatun Muntazir), situated in Model Town, Lahore Pakistan), who met Tahirul Qadiri in Iran confirms that Tahirul Qadri and himself performed Salaah behind a Shia Imaam. In Denmark, Tahirul Qadri performed Salaah behind a certain Molvi Idris Deobandi. The Sunni Ulema wrote letters about this incident. These letters are in the possession of Mufti Ghulam Sarwar Al Qadri and Moulana Abu Dawood Mohammed Sadeck.Judge for yourself as to what type of person Tahirul Qadri is! He calls himself a "staunch Sunni" but does not hesitate in intentionally reading his Salaah behind the enemies of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) and his Ashaab (radi Allahu anham). See how Tahirul Qadri compromises! At this moment we would like to mention an incident that occurred during the time of Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). It is reported that a dispute arose between a Jew and a so-called Muslim. When this case was brought to Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), he ruled in favour of the Jew. When this so-called Muslim went to Sayyiduna Umar Farooq (radi Allahu anhu) to complain about the decision given against him, Sayyiduna Umar Farooq (radi Allahu anhu) immediately drew his sword and struck of the head of this so-called Muslim (Munafiq). Had Tahirul Qadri been witness to such an incident, would be have said that Sayyiduna Umar Farooq (radi Allahu anhu) was "sitting on the Throne of Allah and His Prophet."According to Tahirul Qadri only Allah and His Rasool (sallal laahu alaihi wasallarn) have knowledge of the Kaafir and Munafiq. We ask Tahirul Qadri, did Sayyiduna Umar Farooq (radi Allahu anhu) perform such a deed without knowledge? We are sure that you will say yes, that he had knowledge. In the same manner, today too, the Ulema-e-Ahle Sunnan by virtue of their knowledge can ascertain who is a Munafiq, a Kaafir, a Murtad or a Faasiq. After all, can you not by virtue of your "knowledge" perceive a

Munafiq? Perhaps, you yourself are "saving your own skin" from the decision of the Ulema of the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah from branding you to a term applicable to your own self! Are you not contradicting your beliefs by calling certain Deobandi Molvis and their followers Kaafirs! It is a fact of documented history that when the Muslims were still in a minority in Madinatul Munawarrah, Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) banished the Munafiqs from Masjidun Nabawi. Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) never agreed to a compromise with the Munafiqs for whatever reasons. Today, when we Muslims are in a majority as when compared to the Munafiqs amongst us, we will never compromise on Islamic principles. But Tahirul Qadiri, who claims to be a "representative from the Prophet's community" believes that we must compromise with those who are misled. He believes that we are now living in modem times and circumstances. In other words, he knows the present times and circumstances better than even Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). Ma' azzallah!If compromise is the remedy of Muslim survival then Sayyidnna Imam Hussain (radi Allahu anhu) would have compromised with Yazid, after all, Yazid had also recited the Kalima Yet, he never did. (A'la Hazrat, Imam Ahmad Raza Khan (radi Allahu anhu) would have compromised with certain Deobandis. Yet, he never did. Why? Because true Muslims believe: "And cover not truth with falsehood, nor conceal the truth when you know what it is." (2: 42) A'la Hazrat, Imam Ahmed Raza Khan (radiAllahu anhu) has clearly stated that, "To organise such a function in which Shias and Wahabis can be members, to attend such functions is Haraam and to frequent the corrupt sects is like afire. Only such a person will donate money to this function who has no religion and has totally lost all senses. Therefore, stay far from the corrupt, remain aIoof from them so that they will not be able to corrupt you or immerse you in their fitnah." Alhamdullllah, A'la Hazrat (radi Allahu anhu) never compromised. We too will never compromise! MINHAAJUL QURAN" IS IN FACT "MINHAAJUS SHAITAAN" Minhaajul Quran is an organisation that has been formed by Tahirul Qadri. Let us see what he has to say about the policy of this organization. Tahirul Qadri says: "In my Institute, Minhaajul Quran, members of Jamaat-e-Islami

can also become members. In Minhaajul Quran even followers of the AhIe Hadith, Shia, and Deobandis can also be members." (Reference: Jung Newspaper, 2 7February 1987) Let us now inspect the Islamic decision of Ala Hazrat (radi Allahu anhu) about what he says about such mixed gatherings. A'la Hazrat (radi AIlahu anhu) said: "To organise such a mixed function in which Shias and Wahabis can be members, to attend such functions is Haraam, and to frequent the corrupt sects is like a fire. Only such a person will donate money to this function who has no religion and has totally lost all senses. Therefore, stay far from the corrupt, remain aloof from them so that they will not be able to corrupt you or immerse you in their fitnah". DECLARES THAT A "RASOOL" IS NOT A RASOOL In part 2, page 26 of his book, "Ajzaa'e Imaan", Tahirul Qadri declares that a Rasool has to be sent with a Revealed Kitab to be regarded as a Rasool. Yet, it is an accepted fact according to Surah Maryam, verse 54, of the Holy Quran, wherein Hazrat Ismail (alaihis salaam) is regarded as a Rasool and a Nabi, although no Revealed Kitab was sent to him. If you are prepared to accept Tahirul Qadri's definition of a Rasool, you will be guilty of excluding a great Prophet like Hazrat Ismail (alaihis salaam) from the list of Rasools. Allah forbid us from such heresy! CONTRADICTION OF ISSUE OF DIYAT WITH FOUR IMAAMS Tahirul Qadri says that he is a true "Hanafi". Now let us see how this "Hanafi" totally contradicts the verdicts of not only Imam Abu Hanifa (radi Allahu anhu) but all four celebrated Imams (radi Allahu anhum). This man says that as far as Diyat of both men and women is concerned, the amounts are equal. Imam Muhammad bin Hasan Shaybaani (radi Allahu anhu), one of the students of Imam Azam, Imam Abu Hanifa (radi Allahu anhu) states: "Imam Abu Hanifa in the issue of Diyat ha's mentioned that the Diyat for women, be it a severe wound or loss of life, is half that of male." (Kitaabul Hujjah, VoL 4, page 276) The Diyat of the female, being half that of a male, has also been substantiated in the Muwatta, page 670, of Imam Malik (radi Allahu anhu).Imam Shafee (radi Allahu anhu) states: "I have never seen any scholars in my time and those preceding me refuting the fact that the Diyat of women

is half that of man, and this is 50 camels." (Kitaabul Umm, Vol. 5, page 106) This is also accepted in the authentic book of the Hambali school of thought whose leader is Imam Ahmed bin Hambal (radi Allahu anhu), the fourth Imam. (Ar Roudul Murraba, Volume 2, page 339) From this issue we learn that Tahirul Qadri is not a Hanafi. In fact, he does not follow any Madhab! He is attempting to form a "fifth Madhab" in Islam. INDIRECTLY CLAIMING TO BE A MUJTAHID In refutation of Tahirul Qadri, Hadrat Moulana Sayed Ahmed Saeed Kaazmi Shah Saheb (radi Allahu anhu), considered to be the Gazzalli of his age, wrote a book entitled, "Islam me Awrat Ki Diyat". In this book he considers Tahirul Qadri a misled and corrupt individual for having refuted I'jma (Consensus) of the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah. He clearly states that if a person refutes an argumentation of a Mujtahid, then that person has to be on par with a Mujtahid. HIS TRUE FEELINGS OF "TAQLEED" Tahirul Qadri says: "If Taqleed is followed and based on all matters then the capacity of knowledge of Muslims will become tainted and useless." (Firqah Parasti Ka Khaatimah Qu Kar Mumkin Heh, page 25) We can imagine what he must be thinking of all those giant Awliya and Ulema of the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah who have followed Taqleed throughout their lives. What a great enemy of the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah this man is! "QADRI" TITLE MISLEADING Hazrat Allama Ata Mohammed Saheb Bindiyaalwi, a leading Sunni Scholar in Pakistan, has stated that "It is very sad that a person who calls himself a Qadri, refutes the teachings of Ghousal Azam, Shaikh Abdul Qaadir Jilaani (radi Allahu anhu). Even Ghousal Azam (radi Allahu anhu's) teachings are in accordance with I'jmah (Consensus) in the issue of Diyat. This fact is substantiated by his student, Ibne Qudhaamuh. And we are certain that his student knows him better than a scholar presently going around calling

himself a Qadri."This substantiates that Tahirul Qadri's title of "Qadri" does not befit him. His policy of adopting this title is synonymous with his mission, which is but a deception or ploy. Again his intention is nothing but to deceive you, the innocent Sunnis! After all, which Sunni will doubt a person who has the title of "Qadri" after his name. In the ealier sixties, a staunch Wahabi/Deobandi poet and Molvi arrived in South Africa posing as a Sunni and Aashiq-e-Rasool. He was the guest of the Buzme Adab Society. His name was Mahirul Qadri. Look at the similarity of their names. He deceived a lot of Sunnis and attacked the great Sunni Ulema subsequently in his book. Dear Muslims, by Tahirul Qadri refusing to accept the I'jma on the issue of Diyat, he is not only trying to prove that he is a Mujtahid, but on par with them. We ask you: do you think that this man is on par with Imam Azam, Imam Abu Hanifa (radi Allahu anhu), who was the Imam-e-Mujtahid? MISINTERPRETION AND PRESENTATION OF QURANIC VERSES AND ARABIC WORDS We should remember that for a person to present a Tafsir on the Holy Quran he has to be well versed with the Arabic language. He must make sure that he does not recite the Arabic verses incorrectly. He must not quote from the Holy Quran incorrectly. He must be knowledgeable of the basic laws of Arabic Grammar. This "scholar of Islam" cannot even satisfy these basic rules. He has proven that not only is he totally ignorant about the Arabic language but also of the Holy Quran. In page 123 of his book "Tasmiyatut Quran", he incorrectly quotes the 7th verse of Sura Mu'min. In the same book, page 110, he gives the examples of many words, which is based on the "Scale of Ar Rahmaan". However, two examples presented by this man to prove his statements are totally incorrect as both these words are not included in the "scale of Ar Rahmaan". This again proves his ignorance as far as the Arabic language is concerned. He is not qualified to make Tafsir of the Holy Quran. HIS REJECTION OF A FUNDAMENTAL BELIEF OF ISLAM

We should bear in mind that a person who refutes a fundamental belief of Islam is certainly a Kaafir. Therefore, to deliberately assist this person or to create an accord with that person is Haraam. It is our belief that members of the Deobandi, Wahabi, Shia or Qadiani group (firqah) have rejected certain fundamental beliefs of Islam. If this was not the case, then the Ulema of the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah would not have dared considered these groups as misguided or Kaafirs. Yet, Tahirul Qadiri declares in his book, "Firqah Parasti Ka Khaatimah Qu Kar Mumkin Heh", page 59, that: "This is an indisputable fact that between all 'Islamic group's' fundamental beliefs are common. The system of Islamic beliefs stands upon this common foundation. Muslims do not refute the Nabi or Rasool and his Shariah and, besides Islam, they do not accept any other religion. Every Muslim accepts and believes in both action and beliefs pertaining to Tauheed, Risalah, Wahy, the Hereafter, the presence of Angels, the finality of prophethood, Salaah, Roza, Zakaah and Hajj and its compulsion. If there is any dispute then this is only in minor subsidiary issues. This is only according to explanation and interpretation. This does not effect the foundation of Islamic beliefs."Astagfirullah! Concealing the Kufr of others is also Kufr. What Tahirul Qadri is really doing is that he is trying to accommodate and satisfy the corrupt sects by cleverly hiding their derogatory statements made against Allah and His Rasool (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). He says that there is no fundamental difference between the different groups - the Sunni, Deobandi, Wahabi, Shia, etc. He claims that this dispute is only in minor subsidiary issues. He also claims that for Sunnis to target other groups by merely using minor subsidiary issues is unfair. The above statement of Tahirul Qadri is a contradiction of the statement of Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) who said that 72 groups will enter into Jahannam and only one, the Ahle Sunnah, will enter into Jannah. Tahirul Qadri is now trying to prove that Rasoolullah (salal laahu alaihi wasallam) was incorrect in his statement Ma'aazallah! What further proofs does one need to prove this man's open insult to Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (salal laahu alaihi wasallam)? O Sunni Muslim, let us hear the reply from the blessed lips of A'la Hazrat (radi Allahu anhu). A question was put to A'la Hazrat (radi Allahu anhu) which read, "What do the Ulema of religion have to say about Zaid who is a Sayed and also an Imam. He also considers the Wahabi, Shia, Deobandi and Ahle

Sunnah as equal." (Fatawah Radwiyah, vol.3, pg. 292). A'la Hazrat (radi Allahu anhu)'s reply to this question was: "He who believes that the Ahle Sunnah, the Wahabi, the Deobandis and the Shia are equal, so profound is his omittance from the folds of Islam. Salaah behind such a person is Baatil, similar to the performance of Juma Salaah behind a Hindu and a Christian."Therefore Sunni Muslims, do not let this "professor" deceive you. No greater enemy of A'la Hazrat (radi Allahu anhu) has appeared in the present times, than this "reformer". He said that from the time of Ala Hazrat's passing away, no structural progress has been made in this blessed place. Do you know that by this statement, he has insulted the blessed family of A'la Hazrat (radi Allahu anhu), which includes such Awliya as: Hujjatul Islam, Hazrat Haamid Raza Khan (radi Allahu anhu) and Huzoor Mufti Azam-Hind, Shah Mustapha Raza Khan (radi Allahu anhu). These were the illustrious sons of Ala Hazrat (radi Allahu anhu) who followed the great Imam. He has also insulted every Khalifa of A'la Hazrat (radi Allahu anhu) who include, among others, such blessed personalities as: A. Qutbe Madina, Hazrat Moulana Zia-ud-Deen Madani (radi Allahu anhu), the father of Hazrat Shaikh Fazlur Rahmaan Madani (radi Allahu anhu) of Madina Shareef, B. Hazrat Moulana Abdul Aleem Siddique, who was the Shaikh and Spiritual teacher of Professor Fazlur Rahman Ansaari (radi Allahu anhum). He has also insulted practically every Sunni Scholar and layman whose spiritual allegiance is to one of the successors of A'la Hadrat (radi Allahu anhu). PROVEN A LIAR Mufti Mohammed Hussein Naeemi relates that he once found himself sitting next to Tahirul Qadri in a function held at the Jinnah Hall, Pakistan. Tahirul Qadri told him, "Mufti Saheb! Today is the time to take the lead". When Mufti Mohammed Hussein Naeemi enquired as to how this was possible, Tahirul Qadri replied, "If you proclaim that the Diyat of men and women are equivalent then you will be able to take the lead."

Mufti Mohammed Hussein Naeemi states that to further prove his point Tahirul Qadri gave him references from three books to prove that Diyat for men and women is equal. However, Multi Mohammed Hussein declares that when he refereed to these three books none of them proved that Diyat for men and women is equal. (Rooz Nama Wafaaq, Amrooz Jang Lahore, Jasaarat, Karachi, 19 October 1984) It is clear to you that Tahirul Qadri tried to mislead Mufti Naeemi on the Diyat issue. He was proven a liar! HIS BELIEFS WITH REGARDS TO CONDITIONS IN THE QABAR In part 1, page 215 of his book, "Aftaa'e lmaan", Tahinil Qadri writes: "In the issue of resurrection after death it is not necessary that the same body will come to life the second time with the same parts and cells, which was, as was found in the world." He also considers the punishment in the grave as a dream. These beliefs of Tahirul Qadri are new to Islam and totally contrary to the Holy Quran and Sunnah. Let us see though, what the Holy Quran has to declare. In Surah Qiyaamah, verses 14, it is stated: "I do call to Witness the Resurrection Day: and I do call to witness the Self-reproaching Spirit: Does man think we cannot assemble his bodies, No! we are able to put together in perfect order the very tips of his fingers."

TAHIRUL QAdRI - ULAMA Of OKARA TACKLE THE PROfEssOR

In the discourse you are about to unfold, the Jama'at-e-Ahle Sunnat and the Ulama of Okara Pakistaan have taken up the cudgels against Professor Tahir Sahib and have approached the Sage of this Age, Sheikh-ul-Qur'aan wat Tafseer, Faqeeh-ul-'Asr and Ustaazul Ulama, Hazrat Maulana AI-Haaj Abul Fazl Ghulaam Ali Qaadri Ashrafi Okarvi. He was asked by the Ulama of Okara to formulate a questionnaire to put forth to Professor Tahir Sahib in order to once and for all determine whether he is a Sunni Sahi-ul-Aqidah or just a pretender, so that the Ummah at large could be informed accordingly. Just as expected, a lengthy period has elapsed, but the Professor has maintained a deadly silence. The Professor's silence to these questions in Pakistaan was so deafening that it must have shattered the eardrums of the Tahiris. Here, a little insight to the calibre and personality of the QUESTIONER is incumbent to familiarise the reader with this Towering Colossus of a Scholar who runs the rule over the "intellectual pygmy". Hazrat Maulana Ghulaam Ali Okarvi, for more than 50 years has carried out the duty of teaching Qur'aan and Ahadeeth, and by so doing, made thousands of individuals into Scholars of Deen. By virtue of his learning and services to lslaam is called, "Sheikh-ul-Islaam wal Muslimeen". Even the Ulama of Egypt, Syria and Iraq have sought from him permission to teach Hadeeth and Tafseer. Naqeebul Ashraaf, Saiyyidina Peer Taahir Alaauddeen Geelani (may Allah shower His mercy upon him) used to refer to him with the title of "Ustaazu Asaatiza tina" (Teacher of our teachers). This Alim-e-Rabbani has been the Ustaaz of even Mujaddid-e-Maslak-e-Ahle Sunnat, Hazrat Maulana Muhammad Shafee Okarvi (Alaihir Rahmah). Among his other pupils are, Hazrat Maulana Yaar Khan, head teacher of the Jaami'ah Ashraful Madaaris, Okara, Mufti Muhammad Abdus-Subhaan Qaadri of Darul Uloom Qaadiryah Subhaaniyah, Karachi, and his son, Mufti Muhammmad Abdul Aleem Qaadri and numerous high-profile Ulama. Since the Professor has failed to convince the Pakistaani Sunnis of his "Sunniyat" by his failure to answer the questions, lets see if he succeeds in South Africa and elsewhere where the very same questions are once again put to him. The questions are not really difficult to answer, any ordinary Sunni will be able to answer them within minutes, because only a "yes" or a "no" would be sufficient as a response. Why the ducking, the dodging, the diving and the evading, is clearly beyond us.

TAHIRUL QAdRI - HIs sUPPORTERs - KINdLY REsPONd TO THEsE QUEsTIONs

However, before we put forward the questions to Professor Tahir Sahib within this document we would first like to pose several questions to his supporters as well, to determine their "Sunniyat" and their ability to respond. We trust they will not emulate their Professor's evasive tactics. So lets put these supporters and admirers of the Professor to a simple test through these simple questions: (1) Do you accept the Professor's contention that there are no fundamental differences between the Sunnis and the other 72 Jahannami sects? (2) Do you share the Professor's belief that Ala Hazrat's Fatawa of Kufr in Husaamul Haramain against Ashraf AIi Thanwi, Rashid Ahmed Gangohi, Khaleel Ahmed Ambhetwi and Muhammad Qaasim Nonotwi, although correct then, but it is NOT APPLICABLE TODAY? (Null and void). (3) Do you believe like the Professor that Salaah behind the Wahabi, Deobandi, Tablighi and Shia lmaams is permissible? (4) Do you HONESTLY BELIEVE AND ACCEPT that the Professor's "dreams" attributed to our beloved Prophet are TRUE? (5) Do you agree that the Professor's rejection of the Asa and the Second Azaan at a Jum'ah assembly in Pretoria, an act of a SUNNI, and was this act JUSTIFIED? (6) Do you believe like the Professor that Allah's beloved Prophet - Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam - was not bestowed with any authority whatsoever? (lqtiyaar) (7) Do you accept the ruling of the Professor on the Mas' ala of "Diyat" and reject the consensus of the lmaams.of Hanafi, Shafaee, Maliki and Hambali Mazaahib etc? (8) Where you aware - prior to the arrival of the Professor to South Africa that he performs his Salaah behind the Imaams of Wahaabis, Deobandis and Shias, etc? (9) Do you agree with the statement of the Professor when he stated that his mission is not to work for the loftiness of Sunni-Hanafiyat or for the school of the Ahle Sunnat? (10) Do you endorse the statement of the Professor when he said that Khomeini lived like Hazrat Ali and died like Imaam Husain and that love for Khomeini demands that every child should become a Khomeini?

(11) Is it permissible for a Sunni Muslim to attend the death anniversary gathering. and make Dua-e-Maghfirat for Khomeini, can such a person doing so be called a Sunni? (12) Do you endorse the belief of your Professor that if you have to accumulate all the knowledge of the Sahaaba-e-Kiraam, it will not even be equivalent to the knowledge of Hazrat Ali? Now this is where the fun really starts, lets see if you can score 12 out of 12. Unfortunately there are no prizes to be won for a 100% score. If the admirers of the Professor respond correctly to the above 12 questions and which correspond with our answers, then the Professor can never be a Sunni, by YOUR OWN ENDORSEMENT. But if they remain silent, duck, dive and dodge these questions like their Professor is presently doing, then you all are placing your Sunniyat in jeopardy. The ball is now in their court, and we are impatiently waiting for their response. We wish to also report that many of his followers in South Africa have disassociated from him and have once again joined the mainstream Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat. May Allah guide all of us on the Straight Path! Aameen.

TAHIRUL QAdRI - fOIsTING A NEW sECT

The founder of the Idara Minhaajul Qur'aan, Professor Taahir Saahib, who is incidentally also the Patron of the Pakistaan Awaami Tahreek, at the inception of his mission presented himself as a Sunni-Hanafi "Bareilvi". He first caught the eye during the commemoration of YAUM-E-RAZA held under the auspices of the ANJUMAN TULAABA-E-ISLAAM in the vicinity of Jang and Lahore. Initially, the Ulama and Awaam of the Ahle Sunnat wa Jama'at were immensely pleased with his lectures as they were in accordance with the Mazhab-e-Haqq. Subsequently, after befriending the wealthy Hajee Mia Muhammad Shareef and his sons Muhammad Nawaaz Shareef and Muhammad Shabaaz Shareef he acquired the medium of television which he used most extensively to his advantage. Thereafter. he published and distributed widely, pamphlets entitled "Naa Baaligh-e-Asr" in which he unashamedly presented his credentials. After gaining public recognition, his interviews with tabloids and newspapers became ever so frequent. It was during this period that the

Sunni Ulama and the Sunni masses of Pakistaan became aware that the Professor whom they were assisting in creating platforms for, was in fact foisting a New Sect in Islam. Whilst the controversy raged during the issue of "Diyat", he attempted to solicit the support of "modern and broad-thinking" women by deceiving them that the "Diyat" for men and women was equal. It was during this period that the hidden agenda of the Professor was becoming more and more transparent which compelled the prominent Ulama to publicly condemn him as MISGUIDED AND ASTRAY and declared him out of the folds of the AhIe Sunnat wa Jama'at. It is truly disturbing to note the extent to which this Professor went merely to acquire the support and recognition of the public. In order to widen this support and recognition he even went so far as to relate a "dream" to an assembly in which he purports that the Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) had stated to him that he was disappointed with all the institutes and Ulama in Pakistaan except the Professor and his Movement. He further claimed that the Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) was prepared to visit him for one week only and he must play host to him, and the purchase of a two-way air ticket from Madinah Munawwara to Lahore for the Holy Prophet, was the responsibility of the Professor. After suffering humiliating defeats in the field of Politics (an area in which he entered through another "Prophetic dream") he then publicly announced his resignation from the Political arena. It is indeed sad to note that Mia Nawaaz Shareef, a staunch supporter of the AhIe Sunnat wa Jama'at cause in Pakistaan and supporter of Professor Taahir Saahib as well, was so disappointed when he realised that he was deceived and hoodwinked by the Professor that he immediately dumped him in disgust and disappointment. This tragic incident caused an exodus of supporters to desert him.

TAHIRUL QAdRI - NO PERsONAL VENdETTA

When the Ulama-e-Haqq unitedly opposed the Professor, they were baselessly accused of being jealous of him. This blatant accusation compelled individual Ulama to scrutinize the books, lectures and newspaper interviews of the Professor and presented their findings to the Sunni masses of Pakistaan thus proving beyond a shadow of doubt that the opposition of the Ulama-e-Haqq against the Professor was totally justified and based on the principles of the Shariah. The question of personal vendetta and jealousy does not even arise. Subsequently, his popularity fell to its lowest ebb in Pakistaan, he was so terribly disgraced and dishonoured that apart from the Sunni masses who have unceremoniously dumped him, even the supporters of other leanings have declared their opposition to him. However, it is indeed unfortunate that a small group of individuals still remain confused about the Professor in Pakistaan (as well as in South Africa) or perhaps they are slow to absorb, or the true picture has not yet been revealed to them. There could be others who may still consider him a "Sunni-Hanafi-Qaadri". This is indeed a tragedy to those whose hearts are sealed.

TAHIRUL QAdRI - QUEsTIONs POsEd TO TAHIRUL QAdRI BY OKARA ULAMA

Because of the confusion still prevalent amongst a small group of individuals regarding the Professor's "Sunniyat" the Jama'at-e-Ahle Sunnat of Okara approached Sheikh-ul-Qur'aan wat Tafseer Hazrat Allamah Ghulaam Ali Ashrafi Okarvi to present several questions to the Professor for his response so that the true identity of Taahir Saahib could be established and the general public be made aware. However, a lengthy period has elapsed and still the Ulama and Awaam of Pakistaan have not been favoured with a response from the Professor. There could be a number of reasons for the Professor's non-commital, maybe he has decided to run away from his commitment or altogether evade the issue. Within this document we have presented a set of unanswered questions scrupulously framed for the Professor's response and for the attention and information of the Muslim public. If for some reason or other the Professor is unable to respond to any of the questions, perhaps some of his supporters or sympathisers could be kind enough to do so. (ULAMA-E-AHLE SUNNAT OKARA) Nahmadahu Wa Nussali Ala Rasoolihil Kareem Allah, in whose name I begin, is the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful.

Janaab "Leader of the Revolution" and founder of the Idara Minhaajul Qur'aan, we have herein presented a few questions and trust that at your earliest convenience you would be able to furnish us with satisfactory answers: PART 1 (1) If a proper Sunni Muslim, possessing proper Sunni beliefs declares that a Muslim rejecting the fundamentals of Islam is a Kaafir, then in your opinion will this Sunni Muslim still remain within the folds of lslam? (2) Presently the overwhelming majority of Raafizis (Shias consider themselves to be "ISNA ASHARIYAH OR JAAFIRIS" (Khomeini's Sect). Are they Muslims or Disbelievers? (3) In view of his writings and lectures, can Khomeini be considered as the Imaam of the Sunnis and is it permissible for a Sunni Sahi'-ul-Aqeeda to make Dua-e-Maghfirat for him? Can one consider the Revolution initiated by Khomeini as an Islamic Revolution? You have also been reported to have declared in the "Daily Nawaa-e-Waqt Lahore dated 8th June 1989, amongst other things that: "Khomeini is like Hazrat Ali and died like Imaam Husain and that love for Khomeini demands that every child becomes like Khomeini." We have seen a photograph of this assembly with you in it thus verifying your presence at this Ijtima. It is also a fact that you have not retracted your statement on Khoineini subsequently. (4) Does one still remain a Sunni after having participated in the 40 days and one year Isaal-e-Sawaab ceremonies of Khomeini even though it is apparent that Khomeini had adhered strictly to the tenets of Shiaism? (5) According to your lectures and writings, you claim that your mission is to create and foster lslamic Brotherhood, although there are many corrupt groups whose leaders have openly insulted Allah and His Rasool. The followers of these groups still consider their infidel leaders as Muslims. Please state clearly what is your belief concerning individuals such as Qaasim Nonotwi, Ashraf Ah Thanwi, Rashid Ahmed Gangohi and Khaleel Ahmed Ambhetwi? What is the ruling of Shari'ah on these individuals and those who still consider these infidels as Muslims? In one of your periodicals,

the Chairman of your Idara Minhaajul Qur'aan, Janaab Anwar Quraishi publicly sympathised at the death of a prominent Deobandi/Wahaabi. Do you hold the same view as your Chairman Anwar Quraishi? Kindly bear in mind that to conceal one's true belief is a cardinal belief of the Shias. Please do not adopt this ploy and state your real belief that is hidden in your heart. Further, what is your belief concerning the Chairman of the Minhaajul Qur'aan? (6) Muhammad ibne Abdul Wahaab and his followers have declared all the Sunni Muslims as Kaafirs and Bid'atis, therefore he considers the killing of the Sunnis and the seizure of their properties as COMPULSORY. I am certain that you must have come across many books which verify these facts, especially the book "Kashful Hijaab an Waj'hi Dalaat-e-ibne Abdul Wahaab" by Peer Saiyyid Taahir Alauddeen Jilaani (your own Peer Murshid). In this book the illustrious Sunni scholar categorically condemns the followers and sympathisers of the evil Wahabi sect. My question to you is, is Salaah behind a Najdi lmaam or any supporter of the Najdi sect permissible? (7) Please explain to me in unambiguous language this "unity" you are always propagating. Is unity this, that we unite with the Munaafiqs and Kaafirs? (8) In your numerous lectures and writings you have stated that you do not belong to any "Maslak", then can you explain on which "Maslak" are your beliefs based? (9) Have you changed the controversial statements in your book "Firqa Parasti ka Khaatimah Qu Kar Mumkin Heh", which you promised to Maulana Taqaddus Ali Khan that you would do? (10) When you do not fully accept or follow the teachings of Huzoor Gh'ausul Azam (Alaihir Rahmah), then why do you insist on posing as a Hanafi-Qaadiri? Huzoor Ghausul Azam (Radiyal Laahu Anhu Ardaahu Anna) has categorically condemned all the 72 astray sect. In his book "Ghunyatut Taalibeen", he has rejected the beliefs of the majority of the Gumrah sects. I am certain you are well aware of this fact since you do claim to be HanafiQaadiri in expounding the issue of "Diyat". (You have unshackled yourself from the "nuisance" of Taqleed) and have clearly indicated that it is not necessary to follow any of the four righteous Imaams of the Ahle Sunnat.

However, jet me remind you that this is in conflict with even the teachings and beliefs of Hazrat Gha'usul Azam (Radi Laahu Anhu Wa Ardaahu Anna), who was attached to the Hambali Mazhab. There seems to be a remarkable similarity between you and Maudoodi Sahib on the issue of "Ijtihaad, then why do you in calling yourself a Hanafi? (11) On the question of "Diyat" you have boldly gone against the Ijma of the venerated Sahaaba-e-Kiraam (Ridwanullahi Taala Alaihim Ajmaeen) and the four Imaams of Shari' at (Alaihimur rahmah), this compelled the Imaam-ewaqt, Imaam-e-AhleSunnat, Imam Allama Saiyyid Ahmed Saeed Kaazmi Mia (Alaihir Rahmah), to declare you as Gumrah and Astray, and a Taghoot (Shaitaan). He also thoroughly rebutted your flimsy arguments. Have you repented yet or not? (12) In your final discourse on the issue of Diyat in front of a mixed audience of men and women, you had the downright audacity to RIDICULE AND MAKE A JOKE of Saiyyidina Rasoollalahs - Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam - authentic and proven Sunnah. My Imaan does not permit me to quote the actual insolent words you uttered. You also repeated this in the presence of Hazrat Allama Kaukab Noorani Okarvi on a journey between Lahore and Islamabaad. Are you so naive not to realise that to make a joke and ridicule an authentic and proven Sunnah of the Mighty Messenger of Allah IS KUFR? We have presented all these facts for the consumption of the Sunni masses so that you do not deceive them with your worn-out excuse of jealousy and personal vendetta. This bluff of yours is nothing but unsubstantiated rubbish. We have supported you in the past without prejudice or jealousy but it seems that you have a mission of your own to create disunity under the guise of unity. If you CANNOT, or WILL NOT respond to my questions, then you leave us with no choice but to explore other avenues to reveal the TRUTH ABOUT YOU AND YOUR MOVEMENT to the Sunni masses of Pakistan. A simple "yes" or no where applicable, is required to my questions, and if you so desire, you could solicit the aid of your "Secret Panel", we have no objections to this. PART 2: Is it not a fact that at the residence of Saiyyid Wajaa'at Rasool Qaadri and in the presence of the following individuals; Hazrat Allamah Kaukab Noorani

Okarvi, Saiyyid Riaasat Ali Qaadri, Hajee Shafee Muhammad Qaadri, Professor Majeedul Qaadri and your former supporter and sympathiser Hazrat Maulana Ghulaam Haider Saiyidi, you uttered a statement, the gist of which is as follows: (1) Fataawa Husaamul Haramain was correct for that period only, however, PRESENTLY IT IS NOT FIT TO BE ACCEPTED. If this is what you have stated (there are witnesses), then what is your opinion concerning the books written by the Kaafir Mirza Ghulaam Ahmed Qaadiani and other Kaafirs such as Ashraf Ali Thanwi, Rashid Ahmed Gangohi, Khaleel Ahmed Ambhetwi and Qaasim Nonotwi? (2) You have stated that you do not consider the "Ulama" of Deoband as Kaafirs because you were NOT THEIR CONTEMPORARY. What then is your opinion about the Qaadianis and other (Murtadds) who have REJECTED THE FUNDAMENTALS OF ISLAM? (3) You have declared YAZEED (PALEED) AS A KAAFIR, was he YOUR CONTEMPORARY? Imaam-e-Azam Abu Hanifa (Radi Allahu Anhu) after thorough research, has with-held his Fatwa-e-Kufr on Yazeed (Paleed), what proof did you discover which even escaped the greatest lmaam of the Mazaahib? Please do not adopt the evasive tactics of the Shias. (4) You have inexplicably declared that if all the controversial books of the Deobandi-Wahabis are to be banned, so should the famous book JAAUL HAQQ by Hazrat Allama Mufti Yar Khan Saahib be banned as well. You have either misunderstood or not read the book properly, or you consider it among the books which contain Kufr. Why have you equated and categorised such an important work compounding the true Aqaaid of the Sunni Muslims with the Kufria books of the Maulvis of Deoband? This book sensationally exposes the fraud of Murtaddeen and the Munaafiqeen. Does this book cause pain to you? PART 3: (1) Could you furnish us with the reasons why so many eminent personalities, supporters and foundation members of Awam Idara Minhaajul Qur'aan have disassociated themselves from your Movement (except the Tarmahomed family of Durban). What caused this great disunity and

dissatisfaction amongst the eminent personalities? (2) How many "Sunni" Ulama thus far have graduated from your institute? Please make their names (and addresses) public. (3) The High Court Commission of Inquiry thoroughly rejected and refuted your MOCK ASSASSINATION attempt. Why have you remained silent for so long and have failed to refute the Courts findings? This stain against religious individuals still exists, please come clean for once and reveals the REAL TRUTH behind your so-called assassination attempt. If you fail to respond to our questions within the next 2 weeks (or at your earliest convenience) then the Jama'at Ahle Sunnat will be constrained to accept that you are SADLY UNABLE to do so, or are COMPLETELY HELPLESS in this regard. However, if you CANNOT, or DO NOT, want to answer, or consider it UNNECESSARY to do so, then please notiFy us of this fact. Further, if we are satisfied with your answers, then we are prepared to assist you in all your future lslamic activities. If not, then after due consultation with all our members including the Ulama-e-Haqq of Okara, we will have no recourse but to announce to the Sunnis of Pakistaan to disassociate themselves from you and have nothing whatsoever to do with you, your mission or your Movement (1) Khaadim-ul- Islaam, Abul Fadl Ghulaam Ali Ashrafi Okarvi, Darul Uloom Ashraful Madaaris, Multan Road, Okara. (2) Ahmed Yaar - Khateeb Jaamia Masjid, Gulla Mandi, Okara. (3) Ghulaam Yaseen - Khateeb Noori Shahi Jaamia Masjid, Okara. (4) Faiz Rasool - Khateeb Jaamia Masjid Deedaar-e- Mustafa, Okara. (5) Muhammad Jahaangir Thaaqib - Khateeb Jaamia Masjid Tayyibah, Okara. (6) Muhammad Iqbal Chishti - Khateeb Markazi Jaamia Masjid Ghausia, Okara. (7) Saiyyid Muhammad Mahmoodul Haqq - Khateeb Madinah Masjid Okara. (8) Ghulaam Yaseen - Khateeb Maule Waalah, Okara. (9) BasheerAhmed Mufti - Jaamia Hanafiyah Ashraful Madaaris Okara. The Executive

Jama'at-e-AhIe Sunnat - Okara Madinah Masjid - Okara N.B. Till this date, No reply from Tahir Sahib has been received!

TAHIRUL QAdRI - CONCLUsION

It should be brought to the attention of the innocent Sunnis that on numerous occasions previously the Ebrahim Tar Mohammed Family of Durban had been warned and educated that this controversial "professor" would create great divisions and disunity among the Sunni masses. However, steeped in their minds was the fact they were financially "powerful" and had many "influential" friends, or so they thought Even after extensive meetings with them, this family was still adamant that they would bring this professor" to South Africa! We are sad to say that by insisting on this, they have certainly destroyed all their previous credibility. Not only have they been humiliated and insulted, but the Sunni masses have finally become aware of this family's true intentions. What is also surprising is that they have always sold their cassettes to the Sunnis, yet, they seemed hell-bent on distributing this professor's" cassettes FREE of charge to whosoever they came across. This again proves the false intentions of this family. Remember that they have always claimed that Hazrat Allama Mufti Mohammed Akhtar Raza Khan Azhari is their "SUPREME COURT", yet, long before he could even give his verdict against Tahirul Qadri, this family had already decided amongst themselves that they were the "Supreme Court" by insisting on distributing these cassettes! The "Supreme Judge" scenario was just to mock Hazrat Allama Mufti Mohammed Akhtar Raza Khan Azhari and the concerned Sunni Muslims. We can continue proving their double standards, however, just this incident is sufficient. These video-cassettes contained material which tried to prove that Tahirul Qadri was a staunch Sunni, all the time though, this was far from

the truth. But video-cassettes that contained professors corrupt beliefs were very cleverly hidden and this was done deliberately. They knew very well that Tahirul Qadri performs Salaah behind Wahabi/Deobandis and Shias, yet concealed this fact from the public and went ahead to sponsor his visit Furthermore, this family is now mass-producing an interview with this heretic where he lies as easy as he breathes concerning the allegations made against him. Tahirul Qadri labels the personality of Hazrat Allama Mufti Mohammed Akhtar Raza Khan (a direct descendant of A'la Hazrat radi Allahu anhu) as the leader of the "Ghundas" (gangsters) and at the same time also insults Allama Zia-ul-Mustapha (the son of one of A'la Hazrat's Khalifas). He also brands the Sunni Ulema and the Sunni masses who were present at Grey Street masjid as gansters, ignorant, fanatics and extremists. In his last interview held at the residence of a certain Mr Gani Kazi, Tahirul Qadri among other falsehoods claims that, "I fully endorse the verdict of Ala Hazrat Imam Ahmed Raza Khan (radi Alllahu anhu) found in his book "Husaamul Haramain". I do not differ from the verdict of the great Imam. I love and honour him, I always quote him. My organisation Minhaajul Quran has always produced articles on him...". In the very same interview he continues to insult the very family of A'la Hazrat (radi Allahu anhu). He also presents, in this interview, a blue covered booklet whereby he tries to prove that he is a great Lover of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). Can there be a greater con-man of the century? Remember that this very same person is declaring that one who insults Rasoolullah (sallal laahu aiaihi wasallam) should be killed and with the same tongue he says that the differences between the Sunni masses and the minority Wahabi/Deobandi/Tablighi group is merely based on minor and subsidiary issues. At one moment, he accepts that A'la Hazrat (radi Allahu anhu) was correct in declaring certain Wahabi/Deobandi/Tablighi leaders as Heretics because of their Kufr beliefs and in another, he declares that these issues are merely minor! Also bear in mind that he may say to you that the hook "Firqah Parasti ka Khaatimah Qu kar Mumkin Heh" is NOT his book, (as he has already done once), yet on the back cover of this very same blue booklet which he proudly displays to innocent Sunnis, there appears a list of published hooks, and the

name of this book also appears!!! This is also the same "Professor" who claims in one newspaper that "I appeal to Sunnis and Tablighis to stop imposing their values on each other...", and in one interview he states that A'la Hazrat (radi Allahu anhu) was correct in declaring certain Deobandis as heretics. He also states that whosoever doubts the Kufr of these Deobandis, he is also a Kaafir. Remember that this will include all the Tablighis as they still consider Ashraf Ali Thanwi as one of their leaders! Are you not also "Professor" Tahirul Qadri, imposing your "personal" views on others? Such double standards are indeed very hard to find. This man however has a gift of the gab. Tahirul Qadri says in the same VIDEO that he had been victorious and certain "Sunnis" have supported and complimented him. Depending on how you would look at this whole issue you can decide what VICTORIOUS means! Certainly he was victorious in splitting the Muslim Ummah, which is but the aim of the Kuffaar!!!