Meissner effect

Meissner effect
The Meissner effect is the expulsion of a magnetic field from a superconductor during its transition to the superconducting state. The German physicists Walther Meissner and Robert Ochsenfeld discovered the phenomenon in 1933 by measuring the magnetic field distribution outside superconducting tin and lead samples.[1] The samples, in the presence of an applied magnetic field, were cooled below what is called their superconducting transition temperature. Below the transition temperature the samples cancelled nearly all magnetic fields inside. They detected this effect only indirectly; because the magnetic flux is conserved by a superconductor, when the interior field decreased the exterior field increased. The experiment demonstrated for the first time that superconductors were more than just perfect conductors and provided a uniquely defining property of the superconducting state. Despite having been known for over 80 years, no dynamical explanation of the Meissner effect exists within the conventional understanding of superconductivity.[2]

Diagram of the Meissner effect. Magnetic field lines, represented as arrows, are excluded from a superconductor when it is below its critical temperature.

Explanation
In a weak applied field, a superconductor "expels" nearly all magnetic flux. It does this by setting up electric currents near its surface. The magnetic field of these surface currents cancels the applied magnetic field within the bulk of the superconductor. As the field expulsion, or cancellation, does not change with time, the currents producing this effect (called persistent currents) do not decay with time. Therefore the conductivity can be thought of as infinite: a superconductor. Near the surface, within a distance called the London penetration depth, the magnetic field is not completely cancelled. Each superconducting material has its own characteristic penetration depth.

A magnet levitating above a superconductor cooled by liquid nitrogen.

Any perfect conductor will prevent any change to magnetic flux passing through its surface due to ordinary electromagnetic induction at zero resistance. The Meissner effect is distinct from this: when an ordinary conductor is cooled so that it makes the transition to a superconducting state in the presence of a constant applied magnetic field, the magnetic flux is expelled during the transition. This effect cannot be explained by infinite conductivity alone. Its explanation is more complex and was first given in the London equations by the brothers Fritz and Heinz London. It should thus be noted that the placement and subsequent levitation of a magnet above an already superconducting material does not demonstrate the Meissner effect, while an initially stationary magnet later being repelled by a superconductor as it is cooled through its critical temperature does.

Meissner effect

Perfect diamagnetism
Superconductors in the Meissner state exhibit perfect diamagnetism, or superdiamagnetism, meaning that the total magnetic field is very close to zero deep inside them (many penetration depths from the surface). This means that their magnetic susceptibility, = 1. Diamagnetics are defined by the generation of a spontaneous magnetization of a material which directly opposes the direction of an applied field. However, the fundamental origins of diamagnetism in superconductors and normal materials are very different. In normal materials diamagnetism arises as a direct result of the orbital spin of electrons about the nuclei of an atom induced electromagnetically by the application of an applied field. In superconductors the illusion of perfect diamagnetism arises from persistent screening currents which flow to oppose the applied field (the meissner effect); not solely the orbital spin.

Consequences
The discovery of the Meissner effect led to the phenomenological theory of superconductivity by Fritz and Heinz London in 1935. This theory explained resistanceless transport and the Meissner effect, and allowed the first theoretical predictions for superconductivity to be made. However, this theory only explained experimental observationsit did not allow the microscopic origins of the superconducting properties to be identified. Nevertheless, it became a requirement on all microscopic theories to be able to reproduce this effect. This was done successfully by the BCS theory in 1957. However, both phenomenological Londons theory and microscopic BCS one describe the Meissner effect in its steady state only and cannot explain the transient stage when the supercurrent grows from zero to its steady value. Indeed, under initial conditions of the Meissner effect, Lorentz force equals to zero, and there are no other electromotive forces in superconductor to accelerate the electrons. This fundamental problem of the conventional theory of the Meissner effect has been pointed out by J. E. Hirsch in The Lorentz force and superconductivity.[3] He has also proposed the dynamical explanation of the Meissner effect in Spin Meissner effect in superconductors and the origin of the Meissner effect.[4]

A tin cylinderin a Dewar flask filled with liquid heliumhas been placed between the poles of an electromagnet. The magnetic field is about 8 milliteslas (80 G).

T=4.2K, B=8mT (80 G). Tin is in the normally conducting state. The compass needles indicate that magnetic flux permeates the cylinder.

The cylinder has been cooled from 4.2K to 1.6K. The current in the electromagnet has been kept constant, but the tin became superconducting at about 3K. Magnetic flux has been expelled from the cylinder (the Meissner effect).

Meissner effect

Paradigm for the Higgs mechanism

The Meissner effect of superconductivity serves as an important paradigm for the generation mechanism of a mass M (i.e. a reciprocal range, where h is Planck constant and c is speed of light) for a gauge field. In fact, this analogy is an abelian example for the Higgs mechanism, through which in high-energy physics the masses of the electroweak gauge particles, W and Z are generated. The length is identical with "London's penetration depth" in the theory of superconductivity.

Observation
Before the discovery of high-temperature superconductivity, observation of the Meissner effect was difficult, because the applied fields had to be relatively small (the measurements need to be made far from the phase boundary). But with yttrium barium copper oxide, the effect can be demonstrated using liquid nitrogen. Permanent magnets can be made to levitate.

References
[1] Meissner, W.; R. Bochsenfeld (1912). "Ein neuer Effekt bei Eintritt der Supraleitfhigkeit" (http:/ / www. springerlink. com/ content/ l69w054091n24j14/ ?p=d517b9e40b344f9bb3fc19ee23a823b3& pi=4). Naturwissenschaften 21 (44): 787788. Bibcode1933NW.....21..787M. doi:10.1007/BF01504252. . [2] . http:/ / iopscience. iop. org/ 0295-5075/ 81/ 6/ 67003/ fulltext/ . [3] J. E. Hirsch (2003). "The Lorentz force and superconductivity". Phys. Lett. A 315 (6): 474. arXiv:cond-mat/0305542. Bibcode2003PhLA..315..474H. doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(03)01107-1. [4] J. E. Hirsch (2008). "Spin Meissner effect in superconductors and the origin of the Meissner effect". Europhys. Lett. 81 (6): 67003. Bibcode2008EL.....8167003H. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/81/67003.

Michael Tinkham (2004). Introduction to Superconductivity. Dover Books on Physics (2nd ed.). ISBN9780486435039.. A good technical reference. Fritz Wolfgang London (1950). "Macroscopic Theory of Superconductivity". Superfluids. Structure of matter series. 1. OCLC257588418.. Revised 2nd edition, Dover (1960) ISBN 9780486600444. By the man who explained the Meissner effect. pp.3437 gives a technical discussion of the Meissner effect for a superconducting sphere. Wayne M. Saslow (2002). Electricity, Magnetism, and Light. Academic. ISBN9780126194555. OCLC51032778.. pp.486489 gives a simple mathematical discussion of the surface currents responsible for the Meissner effect, in the case of a long magnet levitated above a superconducting plane.

External links
Maglev Trains (http://www.magnet.fsu.edu/education/tutorials/slideshows/maglev/index.html) Audio slideshow from the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory discusses magnetic levitation, the Meissner Effect, magnetic flux trapping and superconductivity. Meissner Effect (Science from scratch) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44mVZdnR6Yc) Short video from Imperial College London about the Meissner effect and levitating trains of the future. Introduction to superconductivity (http://www.alfredleitner.com/superconductors.html) Video about Type 1 Superconductors: R=0/Transition temperatures/B is a state variable/Meissner effect/Energy gap (Giaever)/BCS model. Meissner Effect (Hyperphysics) (http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/solids/meis.html) Possible root of the Meissner effect (http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.2347)

Article Sources and Contributors

Article Sources and Contributors

Meissner effect Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=477204688 Contributors: Agnistus, Aleitner, Alureiter, AnonNemoVoid, BailesB, BananaFiend, Bokbindaren, Bryan Derksen, CapitalR, Choihei, ChristophDemmer, Circuitboardsushi, Coemgenus, Cyfal, DaGizza, Daggerstab, David R. Ingham, David.Monniaux, Diamonddavej, Discospinster, Dodecagon, Dsmurat, Ebear422, Eleider, Enno, EoGuy, Erasmusbee, Ewulp, Eynar, FlorianMarquardt, Friendofthefoot, Geelen, Gene Nygaard, Harp, Headbomb, HereToHelp, Iceman9985, Igodard, Jacquesbezuidenhout, Jaguar2k, Jernejl, Johnman239, Johnvonahlen, Jorgecarleitao, Jqt, Julesd, K Eliza Coyne, Kent Witham, Kthemank, Larryisgood, LeadSongDog, Louise Rill, Mayur, Mea, Meisam.fa, Michael Hardy, Milez, Mr Evil, Mxn, Nethershaw, Netscott, Nibios, Ninly, Nobody267, Ojigiri, Ost316, Oxymoron83, Perspicacite, Petiatil, Pgm944, Pieter Kuiper, Quarky2001, Qwerty Binary, Qwerty937, R0uge, RJFJR, RekishiEJ, Robma, RockMagnetist, Rorro, Saperaud, Sardanaphalus, Shantavira, Siddharth srinivasan, Sim man, Spinningspark, Sunilvarma.d, Suspekt, Svdmolen, Syndicate, Tetracube, The Thing That Should Not Be, Tim Starling, Tobias Bergemann, User071, Vanderdecken, Verdatum, Versus22, Vijayaraj83, Vze2wgsm1, WLU, WMSwiki, Waleswatcher, Why Not A Duck, Wikiborg, William Avery, Wricardoh, Xenocide321, YBCO, Zetawoof, Zomno, 137 anonymous edits

Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors

Image:EfektMeisnera.svg Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:EfektMeisnera.svg License: Public Domain Contributors: Piotr Jaworski, PioM ENDEPL; POLAND/Pozna Image:Meissner effect p1390048.jpg Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Meissner_effect_p1390048.jpg License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported Contributors: Mai-Linh Doan Image:Tin_4.2K_Electromagnet.jpg Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Tin_4.2K_Electromagnet.jpg License: Public Domain Contributors: [I, Alfred Leitner took this photograph as apart of my movie on Type I Superconductors] Image:Tin_80gauss_4.2K.jpg Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Tin_80gauss_4.2K.jpg License: Public Domain Contributors: I, AlfredLeitner, took this photograph as part of my movie about Type I Superconductivity Image:Tin_80gauss_1.6K.jpg Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Tin_80gauss_1.6K.jpg License: Public Domain Contributors: I, AlfredLeitner, took this photograph as part of my movie about Type I Superconductivity

License
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported //creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/