Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The bus driver made a profound difference to this boy, perhaps giving him reason to live and the strength to survive. Scientifically we know that respectful relationships with children make a profound difference to their lives. In fact research shows, just like the true story above, in some of the most dire of circumstances the wellbeing and very survival of children can hinge on one significant person one relationship. This story highlights what Don't Think of a Dinosaur is about: ways to touch, inspire and move people to make a difference. Stories are a very effective way to achieve this outcome, as most ancient cultures have demonstrated by maintaining knowledge over hundreds of generations and thousands of years relying heavily on oral communication through story. There is a need to redefine our social, economic and environmental goals in ways that include and address the problems with a positive expression of the way forward a vision to be created instead of the destruction or extinction of a dinosaur. This broadening of purpose to a positive frame still works to address and benefit the very real needs of victims and marginalised Australians, however it does so in a way that moves us forward together and beyond the inevitable blaming and win-lose scenarios of problem centric campaigns.
Sydney's SuperDome beyond a regenerated wetlands corridor. Once filled with rubbish, the wetlands now provide a home for native plants and animals.
John F. Kennedy's vision to put a man on the moon before the end of the 1960s is often recalled as an excellent example of the importance and influence of a bold vision, especially since the technology to achieve this goal did not exist in 1962 at the time the commitment was made. Some time before the vision was achieved in 1969 a visitor to NASA asked a cleaner who got into the lift with them What do you do here? The cleaner replied "I'm helping to put a man on the moon." How many social change strategies, policies and campaigns achieve this clarity and ownership of their vision? How many visions of social change resonate so deeply with the people who will, could or should fulfil them? Vision reflects what is most important our most important values and beliefs and as a future possibility it represents the dreams, hopes and aspirations of everyone.
In recent decades profound developments have taken place in the objective realms increased life span (It), internet technologies (Its), identifying genes linked to depression and violence (It), United Nations government (Its) and globalisation (Its). The social change required today however requires much greater integration of the subjective realms both individual and collective wellbeing with the objective (technology, economics, material goods). Yet today a lot of modern social change strategy and policy only focus on change that can be objectively (within the realms of current knowledge and science anyway) measured.
For example, the volume of existing research showing the links between hitting of children and mental, emotional and social dysfunction could fill truck loads. However many individuals and cultures still believe it is okay to smack their children. They believe (I, We) this for cultural, religious, personal and other reasons. Germany made laws (Its) that banned physical punishment, however the successful decline in the behaviour (It, Its) has mostly resulted from extensive parent education about managing stress, emotions, positive discipline and peaceful conflict resolution skills. These are I and Its domains. A child that acts unlovable needs to be loved. (Anonymous) Don't Think of a Dinosaur is about a vision of social wellbeing and environmental and economic sustainability. We need a vision that encompasses our internal subjective wellbeing as well as the external and objective. Individually we yearn for happiness (which is after all an inside jobvii), inner peace and calm. Our increasingly diverse communities also yearn for respect, inclusion and understanding. Environmentally we have technologies and systems which are indeed sustainable renewable energy, electric cars, organic food, compact development, reuse and recycling programs yet by and large our values and culture do not yet prioritise nature's wellbeing. Paradoxically the argument this is because sustainable choices are too expensive comes from the wealthiest societies on the planet, including most Australians, which also have the largest and most damaging environmental footprints. A friend of mine is passionate about conserving water and inspired by their father who was a water engineer and role model. In their medium sized inner city terrace one wall of the garage is lined with two water tanks: one collects rain water for washing and toilets; the other filters grey water for gardens from washing, showers and sinks. The following conversation took place with their neighbour soon after the water system was installed. Neighbour: How much did the system cost and how long will it take for you to make back the cost from saved water bills? Friend: Well you know how your family has two matching BMW convertibles and how my family have two Mopeds and a small city car? Neighbour: Yes. Friend: I imagine you really enjoy driving your BMWs, and even though they cost much more than our Mopeds they are worth it? Neighbour: Yes we sure do. Friend: My water system is really worth it. I like water.
Climate change is only one of many ecological calamities we face. The loss of habitat caused in the last few centuries alone felled forests, dried rivers, desertification and barren ocean fisheries is greater than any time before in human history. Biodiversity is intricately interwoven and interdependent. Species extinctions are accelerating both through direct harvest and through the loss of habitat they once lived in. Some scientists believe we have already harmed planetary systems to the point that massive environmental shift is inevitable with or without renewable energies, sustainable development and massive reuse and efficiency gains in resource usage (though every single one of these and more are of course valuable and required). However the benefits from the use and decimation of the planet and its resources have, until very recently, mostly benefited the few societies who had the technologies of guns and steel or the nave biological weapon of germs.ix The global population has boomed, requiring exponentially increasing resources to sustain a quality of life that for most remains far from modern or civilised. If our global community was a village of only 100 peoplex: 33 are attempting to live on only 3% of the income of the village; 5 control 32% of the wealth; 80 live in substandard housing; 67 are unable to read; 50 are malnourished and 1 person is dying of starvation; 33 do not have access to a safe water; 24 do not have any electricity (76 only for light at night); 7 people would have access to the Internet; 1 would have HIV; and, 2 being born and, 1 dying. Economic development and the advancement of technology are without doubt one of the greatest success stories of the last millennium especially for the 67% of the world's population who hold 97% of the economic wealth. But, and this is a big but, the economic development and wealth are not ecologically sustainable. Our economy is heavily dependent on fossil fuels and consuming carbon affecting human induced climate change and the use of seriously depleted natural resources. Of Australia's 200 largest publicly listed companies, 145 are such large emitters of greenhouse gases they were served notice to address the legal, financial and regulatory risks of climate change.xi
It is time to strap ourselves in for the drive of our lives. In the coming decades our lifestyles, values, technologies, systems, economies, work, relationships, communities and societies are going to change paradigm again and again. We are experiencing a paradigm storm wave upon wave of paradigm shift, layering on top of each other and causing further shifts as they interact. We are adapting at a rate and on a scale not previously known by humanity. To achieve environmental sustainability and an economy which is sustainable and improves the wellbeing of societies right across the globe we must not think of a dinosaur. Rather, we must think, feel, act and adapt, towards sustainable wellbeing. Our economy will be knowledge-based rather than resource based an economy that turns over with services enabling the skills and capacities for wellbeing and sustainability. Three super paradigm shifts are upon us: 1. Moving towards lives of wellbeing personal, family, community, social and global wellbeing that are much broader and less reliant on material wealth alone. Material wealth is a luxury that is environmentally unsustainable, becoming scarce and what material level that can be sustained needs to be shared among billions more people than currently is the case; 2. Swift evolution of a sustainable economy a form of economics strongly integrated with both social wellbeing and environmental sustainability. This sustainable business and economy has been usefully described as the single bottom linexii; and 3. Conserve, rehabilitate and regenerate the natural systems of Earth. Change processes are rarely simple or predictable and the paradigm storm we are now experiencing is likely to be neither. It is wise to have back up and redundancy systems in place. Living in a resource constrained world is likely to make local life much more important for food, community and entertainment. Being able to commute energy-light (walk, bike, public transport) will be increasingly important too. Renewable energy is of course critical, as will independent energy sources like domestic solar and micro wind and hydro, to power essential items should mains energy grids be unstable or interrupted. Energy-light technology, such as solarised communication devices, will be essential. The World Wildlife Funds Living Planet Report identifies Cuba as the only country in the world to meet requirements for sustainable development (low resource use and high living standards). Cuban cities and towns produce most of their food within their boundaries and some actually export produce. Cuba is economically described as 'poor' however: Life expectancy averages 77.4 years (Australia male 78.5 years (Indigenous 59.4) and female 83.3 years (Indigenous 64.8)) Infant mortality is 9 per 1,000 live births (Australia male 5, female 4; Indigenous male 15, Indigenous female 12) The literacy rate is 97% Education (one teacher for every 16 students) and medical systems are free (one doctor for every 167 people) 50 colleges and universities have been established in the provinces to expand learning opportunities and strengthen rural communities
children with a safe healthy way to travel and an opportunity to bond with other children, caring adults and their wider community. The initiative provides both relief and connection for parents who can participate as volunteers or use the walking bus as an alternative to bus or car travel. Enable, Transform & Adapt As people's connection and involvement with practical actions the vision grows and it becomes possible to enable them to transform and adapt their lifestyles, work, business and tread more lightly on the Earth.
Australian Ethical's refurbished office building (Block E of Trevor Pearcey House in Bruce, ACT) was awarded the 'world leadership' rating by the Green Building Council of Australia. It has a 6 Star environmental rating. The Abu Dhabi Future Energy Company has initiated a $6 Billion (AUD) plan to build by 2009 a six square kilometre city free of cars and powered by renewable energy from wind and solar farms. The city of Abu Dhabi accounts for more than 90 percent of the United Arab Emirate's oil resources which rank third largest in the world. The Chief Executive Sultan Al Jaber says: As the first major hydrocarbon-producing nation to take such a step, Abu Dhabi has established its leadership position... a global cooperative platform for open engagement in the search for solutions to some of mankind's most pressing issues -- energy security, environment and truly sustainable human development.''xv Support & Sustain As the process of social change deepens and takes hold in daily life it becomes necessary to support and sustain the adaptation taking place.
On 1 December 1948 the President Oscar Arias Snchez of Costa Rica broke down this wall to symbolise the government's commitment to peace and the abolition of the military. The military budget was redeployed to provide greater access to education and cultural programs. The country still invests in security by maintaining Police Guard forces. Unlike its neighbours, Costa Rica has not endured a civil war since.
Conclusion
Margaret Mead is famously quoted for saying: Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Don't Think of a Dinosaur provides a roadmap to touch, move and inspire such small groups of citizens to change the world. The paradigm shift now being experienced by humanity is unprecedented. Many small groups have begun adapting to accommodate the great transition to a sustainable and well society. Their actions and stories will inspire others and slowly and surely sow the seeds for our collective social, environmental and economic success. Different to the many forms of social change which have taken place before now, this shift is towards visions that are bold, courageous and inspiring. Such visions have the qualities to grow in the hearts and minds of people everywhere and enable them to make the greatest transition in human history an act of adaptation through a paradigm storm of social, environmental and economic transformation. Adam F Blakester Change Strategist 0419 808 900 adam@paradigmplay.net References Collins J, Porras J. 1994. 'Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies ', Harper Business. Diamond, J. 1997. 'Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies', W.W. Norton & Company Eckersley, R. 2005. 'Well & Good: Morality, meaning and happiness, Text Publishing. Fattore, T (NSW Commission for Children and Young People); Mason J and Watson L. (University of Western Sydney); 2007. 'Overview of Children's Understandings of Wellbeing', NSW Commission for Children & Young People, Sydney. Gilding, P; Hogarth, M; Reed, D. (Ecos Corporation) 2002. 'Single Bottom Line Sustainability, How a Value Centred Approach to Corporate Sustainability can pay off for Shareholders and Society', Sydney. Lakoff, G. 2005, 'Don't think of an Elephant', Chelsea Green Publishing. Sydney Organising Committee for the Olympic Games, 2001. 'Official Report of the XXVII Olympiad, Volume 1', Paragon Printers. Wilbur, K. 2000. 'A Theory of Everything: An Integral Vision for Business, Politics, Science and Spirituality', Shambhala Publications.
The title for the Don't think of a Dinosaur social change strategy has been derived from George Lakoff's book titled Don't think of an Elephant. ii Fattore, T; Mason J; Watson L (2007: 1) iii Eckersley, R (2005: 77) iv Collins J; Porras J (1994). This type of vision was described as a Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG). v Sydney Organising Committee for the Olympic Games (2001: 367) vi Wilbur, K (2000: 70) vii King, P. Personal comment. viiiThe number of armed conflicts in the world has been declining since 1990. The Facts on War & Peace, New Internationalist, http://www.newint.org/features/1999/04/01/thefacts/index.php ix Diamond J. (1997) x Family Care Foundation, http://www.familycare.org/news/if_the_world.htm xi Maurice Blackburn Cashman and Climate Action Network Australia, 30 July 2003, Sydney xii Gilding, P; Hogarth, M; Reed, D. (Ecos Corporation) 2002. xiiihttp://www.randwick.nsw.gov.au/default.php?id=1222 xiv http://www.unep.org/billiontreecampaign/CampaignNews/UttarPradesh.asp xv http://www.ipsnews.org/news.asp?idnews=38187