Professional Documents
Culture Documents
^
N
^
S c c
D
^
N
2
c
H
^
N
4
_ _
.
1
The band constants were sequentially rounded and retted
[53] starting from the highest order parameter of the high-
est observed vibrational level. The rounded constants for
64
ZnH,
64
ZnD,
114
CdH, and
114
CdD are reported in Tables
1 and 2.
The data for all isotopologues were then combined and
tted simultaneously using Dunham-type energy level
expressions modied for
2
R
+
states, i.e., the following
equations for e(J = N + 1/2) and f(J = N 1/2) parities,
respectively.
E
e
v;N
m0
l0
Y
l;m
v
1
2
_ _
l
NN 1
m
1
2
N
m1
l0
c
l;m
v
1
2
_ _
l
NN 1
m1
; 2
E
f
v;N
m0
l0
Y
l;m
v
1
2
_ _
l
NN 1
m
1
2
N 1
m1
l0
c
l;m
v
1
2
_ _
l
NN 1
m1
. 3
In Le Roys formulation of the BornOppenheimer break-
down parameters [54] for a diatomic molecule AB, the
Dunham constants for each isotopologue (a) are related
to those for a chosen reference isotopologue (a = 1) by
the following equation:
Fig. 4. An expanded view of one rotational line in the ZnD infrared
spectrum showing the isotope splitting and the spin doubling (e/f).
90 A. Shayesteh et al. / Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 237 (2006) 8796
Y
a
l;m
Y
1
l;m
M
a
A
M
1
A
M
a
A
_ _
d
A
l;m
M
a
B
M
1
B
M
a
B
_ _
d
B
l;m
_ _
l
1
l
a
_ _
ml=2
.
4
In the above equation, d
A
l;m
and d
B
l;m
are the BornOppen-
heimer breakdown correction parameters for atoms A
and B, respectively, M
A
and M
B
are atomic masses, and
ls are reduced masses. An analogous reduced mass scaling
relationship exists for the spinrotation interaction con-
stants [50]:
c
a
l;m
c
1
l;m
l
1
l
a
_ _
ml=2
. 5
Program DParFit was used for multi-isotopologue t-
ting, with the reference isotopologues chosen to be
64
ZnH
and
114
CdH. The Dunham constants of the reference isoto-
pologues and the BornOppenheimer breakdown correc-
tion parameters are presented in Tables 3 and 4. The
sequential rounding and retting technique [53], starting
from the parameter with largest relative uncertainty, has
been applied to the constants of Tables 3 and 4 to minimize
the number of digits required to reproduce the data accu-
rately. The Dunham constants of
64
ZnD and
114
CdD are
derived from those of
64
ZnH and
114
CdH using Eqs. (4)
and (5), and require more digits, as determined by param-
eter sensitivities [53]. Complete lists of all the data used in
our analyses, and the Dunham constants for all isotopo-
logues are provided in the Supplementary data.
The equilibrium rotational constants (B
e
% Y
0,1
) of
64
ZnH and
114
CdH in Tables 3 and 4 have high precision,
mainly because the pure rotational data were included in
our data set. Using the B
e
constants of
64
ZnH and
Table 2
Band constants (in cm
1
) for the X
2
R
+
ground state of
114
CdH and
114
CdD
a
Molecule Constant v = 0 v = 1 v = 2
114
CdH G
v
0.0 1336.9576(2) 2549.9724(16)
B
v
5.3254120(3) 5.0631697(11) 4.76031(7)
10
4
D
v
3.171414(39) 3.4278(2) 3.961(6)
10
9
H
v
1.265(24) 10.36(13)
10
12
L
v
2.65(5) 6.8(3)
c
v
0.604595(3) 0.55218(1) 0.4916(4)
10
4
c
D,v
1.71829(29) 1.8101(5) 1.99(5)
10
9
c
H,v
6.41(9)
114
CdD G
v
0.0 973.5970(2) 1888.6176(16)
B
v
2.70739863(20) 2.6165496(30) 2.517426(31)
10
4
D
v
0.80227(2) 0.84119(27) 0.908(1)
10
9
H
v
0.056(8) 0.590(96)
10
12
L
v
0.13(1) 0.4(1)
c
v
0.308833(3) 0.290693(24) 0.2707(3)
10
4
c
D,v
0.43525(19) 0.4474(6) 0.46(2)
10
9
c
H,v
0.91(3)
a
The numbers in parentheses are 2r uncertainties in the last quoted digits.
Table 1
Band constants (in cm
1
) for the X
2
R
+
ground state of
64
ZnH and
64
ZnD
a
Molecule Constant v = 0 v = 1 v = 2 v = 3
64
ZnH G
v
0.0 1496.47788(22) 2873.7218(5)
B
v
6.5476308(9) 6.2420626(78) 5.900569(25)
10
4
D
v
4.72631(14) 4.96334(72) 5.3998(34)
10
9
H
v
7.08(8) 1.73(24) 22.5(16)
10
12
L
v
3.99(14) 9.8(3) 21(3)
c
v
0.253108(4) 0.23366(4) 0.21193(8)
10
4
c
D,v
0.7930(7) 0.806(2) 0.868(4)
10
9
c
H,v
5.1(4)
64
ZnD G
v
0.0 1089.91437(14) 2122.38807(21) 3092.1493(8)
B
v
3.35036133(49) 3.2425018(28) 3.127117(5) 3.001227(16)
10
4
D
v
1.21635(3) 1.25213(14) 1.30817(30) 1.3905(7)
10
9
H
v
1.0632(84) 0.364(24) 0.78(7) 4.26(9)
10
12
L
v
0.225(7) 0.42(1) 0.78(5)
c
v
0.129973(3) 0.123093(18) 0.11579(3) 0.10781(8)
10
4
c
D,v
0.20372(18) 0.2032(4) 0.2119(6) 0.225(2)
10
9
c
H,v
0.66(3)
a
The numbers in parentheses are 2r uncertainties in the last quoted digits.
A. Shayesteh et al. / Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 237 (2006) 8796 91
114
CdH, the associated equilibrium internuclear distances
(r
e
) of these species were determined to be 1.593478(2)
and 1.760098(3) A
, respectively. The r
e
distances of
64
ZnD and
114
CdD are expected to be slightly dierent
from those of
64
ZnH and
114
CdH, respectively, due to the
existence of d
H
0;1
correction parameters. Using the derived
B
e
constants in Tables 3 and 4, r
e
distances of
1.593001(2) and 1.759695(2) A
l
1
=l
a
_
for dif-
ferent isotopologues, all the points should fall on a single
curve, providing Eq. (5) holds exactly. This is in fact the
case for ZnH/ZnD and CdH/CdD isotopologues, as is
illustrated in Figs. 5 and 6. The individual c
v
constants
are taken from Tables 1 and 2 (independent ts) and the
solid curves are calculated from the c
l,m
constants of Tables
3 and 4 (multi-isotopologue ts). The plots of Figs. 5 and 6
provide further conrmation for Eq. (5), which was derived
by Brown and Watson [50]. Thus, the BornOppenheimer
breakdown correction parameters for the spinrotation
interaction constants reported by Varberg and Roberts
[48] were artifacts of their neglect of the vibrational depen-
dence of c.
The metalhydrogen internuclear distances (r
e
) of ZnH,
CdH, BeH, andMgHare comparedinTable 6. All these mol-
ecules have a
2
R
+
ground state with an unpaired electron in a
non-bonding molecular orbital. The metalhydrogen dis-
tances of MH
2
molecules (M = Zn, Cd, Be, and Mg) are thus
expected to be very close to those of the corresponding MH
molecules. We found that the MH distances in ZnH and
CdH are about 5% larger than those in ZnH
2
[4] and CdH
2
[3], respectively, while these dierences are about 2% for
BeH/BeH
2
and MgH/MgH
2
pairs (Table 6).
5. Conclusions
High resolution infrared emission spectra of ZnH, ZnD,
CdH, and CdD were recorded with a Fourier transform
Fig. 5. The c
v
constants of
64
ZnH and
64
ZnD (from Table 1) are scaled by
reduced masses and plotted versus the reduced mass scaled vibrational
quantum numbers. The reference isotopologue (a = 1) is
64
ZnH, and the
solid curve is calculated from Eq. (6) using the constants of Table 3.
Fig. 6. The c
v
constants of
114
CdH and
114
CdD (from Table 2) are scaled
by reduced masses and plotted versus the reduced mass scaled vibrational
quantum numbers. The reference isotopologue (a = 1) is
114
CdH, and the
solid curve is calculated from Eq. (6) using the constants of Table 4.
Table 6
A comparison of the metalhydrogen internuclear distances in MH and
MH
2
molecules (M = Zn, Cd, Be, and Mg)
Metal r
e
(MH)/A
r
e
(HMH)/A
Dr
e
/A
64
Zn 1.593478(2) 1.52413(2)
a
0.069
114
Cd 1.760098(3) [1.67528]
b
0.085
9
Be 1.342436(2)
c
1.326407(6)
d
0.016
24
Mg 1.729721(1)
e
[1.69841]
f
0.031
The numbers in parentheses are 2r uncertainties in the last quoted digits.
a
From [4].
b
Experimental r
e
is not available for CdH
2
. The r
s
structure from [3] is
reported in brackets.
c
From [57].
d
From [60].
e
From [59].
f
Experimental r
e
is not available for MgH
2
. The r
s
structure (in
brackets) was calculated from the rotational constants of MgH
2
and
MgD
2
reported in [61] and [62].
94 A. Shayesteh et al. / Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 237 (2006) 8796
spectrometer, and a few vibrationrotation bands in the X
2
R
+
ground state were observed for these species. In addi-
tion, new measurements of pure rotational transitions in
the v = 1 level of the X
2
R
+
ground state were obtained
for CdH and CdD. The new data were combined with
the previous data from diode laser infrared spectra and
pure rotational spectra of ZnH/ZnD and CdH/CdD avail-
able in the literature. Empirical Dunham constants and
BornOppenheimer breakdown correction parameters
were obtained simultaneously from multi-isotopologue ts
to the data, and the equilibrium metalhydrogen internu-
clear distances were calculated. The reduced mass scaling
ratio for the spinrotation interaction constants derived
by Brown and Watson [50] was further conrmed, as all
isotopic data could be tted together without any mass-
scaled correction parameters for the c
l,m
constants. Many
of the BornOppenheimer breakdown parameters reported
previously for CdH and CdD vanished when the vibration-
al dependences of the rotational and spinrotation interac-
tion constants were taken into account properly.
Acknowledgments
Funding for this work was provided in part by the Nat-
ural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)
of Canada. T.D.V. acknowledges support from the Nation-
al Science Foundation in the form of a Research at Under-
graduate Institutions award (# CHE-0518198) and from
the Dreyfus Foundation in the form of a Henry Dreyfus
Teacher-Scholar Award.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data for this article are available on
ScienceDirect (www.sciencedirect.com) and as part of the
Ohio State University Molecular Spectroscopy Archives
(http://msa.lib.ohio-state.edu/jmsa_hp.htm).
References
[1] A. Shayesteh, D.R.T. Appadoo, I.E. Gordon, P.F. Bernath, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 1435614357.
[2] A. Shayesteh, S. Yu, P.F. Bernath, Chem. Eur. J. 11 (2005) 4709
4712.
[3] S. Yu, A. Shayesteh, P.F. Bernath, J. Chem. Phys. 122 (2005)
194301:16.
[4] A. Shayesteh, I.E. Gordon, D.R.T. Appadoo, P.F. Bernath, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys. 7 (2005) 31323142.
[5] A. Shayesteh, S. Yu, P.F. Bernath, J. Phys. Chem. A 109 (2005)
1028010286.
[6] E. Hulthen, Z. Phys. 11 (1922) 284293.
[7] A. Kratzer, Ann. Physik. 71 (1923) 72103.
[8] R.S. Mulliken, Nature 113 (1924) 489490.
[9] E. Hulthen, Nature 116 (1925) 642.
[10] R.S. Mulliken, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 12 (1926) 151158.
[11] E. Hulthen, Z. Phys. 45 (1927) 331336.
[12] R.S. Mulliken, Phys. Rev. 32 (1928) 388416.
[13] W.W. Watson, Phys. Rev. 36 (1930) 11341143.
[14] E. Svensson, Z. Phys. 59 (1930) 333352.
[15] E. Svensson, Nature 131 (1933) 28.
[16] G. Stenvinkel, E. Svensson, Nature 135 (1935) 955.
[17] G. Stenvinkel, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Stockholm
(1936).
[18] E. Svensson, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Stockholm (1935).
[19] Y. Fujioka, Y. Tanaka, Sci. Pap. Inst. Phys. Chem. Res. 32 (1937)
143156.
[20] O. Deile, Z. Phys. 106 (1937) 405417.
[21] G. Stenvinkel, E. Svensson, E. Olsson, Ark. Mat. Astr. Fys. 26 A
(1938) 115.
[22] S. Mrozowski, Phys. Rev. 58 (1940) 597599.
[23] M.A. Khan, Proc. Phys. Soc. 80 (1962) 599607.
[24] M.A. Khan, Proc. Phys. Soc. 80 (1962) 12641268.
[25] K.P. Huber, G. Herzberg, Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure
IV. Constants of Diatomic Molecules, VanNostrand, NewYork, 1979.
[26] W.J. Balfour, A.W. Taylor, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 91 (1982) 921.
[27] W.J. Balfour, Phys. Scr. 25 (1982) 257267.
[28] W.J. Balfour, K.S. Chandrasekhar, B. Lindgren, J. Mol. Spectrosc.
119 (1986) 126136.
[29] W.J. Balfour, R.S. Ram, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 121 (1987) 199208.
[30] L.C. OBrien, W.T.M.L. Fernando, P.F. Bernath, J. Mol. Spectrosc.
139 (1990) 424431.
[31] D.P. Chong, S.R. Langho, J. Chem. Phys. 84 (1986) 56065610.
[32] D.P. Chong, S.R. Langho, C.W. Bauschilcher Jr., S.P. Walch, H.
Partridge, J. Chem. Phys. 85 (1986) 28502860.
[33] K. Balasubramanian, J. Chem. Phys. 93 (1990) 80618072.
[34] Ch. Jamorski, A. Dargelos, Ch. Teichteil, J.P. Daudey, J. Chem.
Phys. 100 (1994) 917925.
[35] E. Eliav, U. Kaldor, B.A. Hess, J. Chem. Phys. 108 (1998) 3409
3415.
[36] J. Dufayard, O. Nedelec, J. Physique 38 (1977) 449458.
[37] X. Qing Tan, T.M. Cerny, J.M. Williamson, T.A. Miller, J. Chem.
Phys. 101 (1994) 63966404.
[38] L.B. Knight Jr., W. Weltner Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 55 (1971) 20612070.
[39] E. Karakyriakos, J.R. Davis, C.J. Wilson, S.A. Yates, A.J. McKinley,
L.B. Knight Jr., R. Babb, D.J. Tyler, J. Chem. Phys. 110 (1999) 3398
3410.
[40] A.J. McKinley, E. Karakyriakos, L.B. Knight Jr., R. Babb, A.
Williams, J. Phys. Chem. A 104 (2000) 35283536.
[41] T.M. Greene, W. Brown, L. Andrews, A.J. Downs, G.V. Chertihin,
N. Runeberg, P. Pyykko , J. Phys. Chem. 99 (1995) 79257934.
[42] X. Wang, L. Andrews, J. Phys. Chem. A 108 (2004) 1100611013.
[43] R.S. Wojslaw, B.F. Peery Jr., Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 31 (1976) 75
92.
[44] R.-D. Urban, U. Magg, H. Birk, H. Jones, J. Chem. Phys. 92 (1990)
1421.
[45] H. Birk, R.-D. Urban, P. Polomsky, H. Jones, J. Chem. Phys. 94
(1991) 54355442.
[46] M. Goto, K. Namiki, S. Saito, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 173 (1995) 585590.
[47] F.A. Tezcan, T.D. Varberg, F. Stroh, K.M. Evenson, J. Mol.
Spectrosc. 185 (1997) 290295.
[48] T.D. Varberg, J.C. Roberts, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 223 (2004) 18.
[49] J.L. Dunham, Phys. Rev. 41 (1932) 721731.
[50] J.M. Brown, J.K.G. Watson, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 65 (1977) 6574.
[51] A.G. Maki, J.S. Wells, Wavenumber Calibration Tables from
Heterodyne Frequency Measurements, NIST Special Publication
821, U.S. Government Printing Oce, Washington (1991).
[52] R.J. Le Roy, DParFit 3.0, A Computer Program for Fitting Multi-
Isotopomer Diatomic Molecule Spectra, University of Waterloo
Chemical Physics Research Report CP-658 (2004); http://
leroy.uwaterloo.ca.
[53] R.J. Le Roy, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 191 (1988) 223231.
[54] R.J. Le Roy, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 194 (1999) 189196.
[55] P.R. Bunker, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 68 (1977) 367371.
[56] J.K.G. Watson, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 80 (1980) 411421.
[57] A. Shayesteh, K. Tereszchuk, P.F. Bernath, R. Colin, J. Chem. Phys.
118 (2003) 11581161.
[58] A. Shayesteh, K.A. Walker, I. Gordon, D.R.T. Appadoo, P.F.
Bernath, J. Mol. Struct. 695696 (2004) 2337.
A. Shayesteh et al. / Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 237 (2006) 8796 95
[59] A. Shayesteh, D.R.T. Appadoo, I. Gordon, R.J. Le Roy, P.F.
Bernath, J. Chem. Phys. 120 (2004) 1000210008.
[60] A. Shayesteh, K. Tereszchuk, P.F. Bernath, R. Colin, J. Chem. Phys.
118 (2003) 36223627.
[61] A. Shayesteh, D.R.T. Appadoo, I. Gordon, P.F. Bernath, J. Chem.
Phys. 119 (2003) 77857788.
[62] A. Shayesteh, D.R.T. Appadoo, I. Gordon, P.F. Bernath, Can. J.
Chem. 82 (2004) 947950.
96 A. Shayesteh et al. / Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 237 (2006) 8796