"Switch It" - Put a Little Hawaii In Your Offense

While the Run & Shoot is over twenty-years old and I have even
discussed its demise from most levels of football, the obvious recent
R&S success story has been the Hawaii Warriors under lifelong
'Shooter, June Jones. With Colt Brennan (and seemingly anyone else
they put back there), they have lit up opposing teams and broken a
few scoreboards along the way. It's a great offense.

But let it be known that Jones has adapted some aspects of the
traditional Mouse Davis Run and Shoot to his liking, discarding some
concepts, adapting others, and overhauling the pass protection.
(Hence why my "What Killed the Run and Shoot" thread doesn't keep
Jones up awake at night - they simply do different things now.)

In the traditional shoot, there were only a few pass packages, but each
had multifarious adjustments for each receiver. They did this by
requiring each receiver to identify the defense and each would adjust
his route on the fly. The QB would synthesize this information and hit
the proper man. As June Jones said when he was still in the NFL:
"When our receivers run up the field, they are going to look for one of
five coverages. A team may use 50 defenses, but to us it will be one of
those five."

Those five coverages were: "(1) Three Deep Zone; (2) Two Deep Zone,
(3) Two Deep Man Under; (4) Man Free [One safety deep with man-to-
man underneath]; (5) Four Across Man (Blitz)."

Now, this was quite successful for many years. Without

overemphasizing the impact, the rise of the zone blitz muddied the
waters for many of these reads and hastened the R&S's retreat. I say I
don't want to emphasize this too much, because the zone blitz has
been around for at least as long as the Shoot, so it wasn't just that.

But there has been a definite trend among Shooters to reduce the
number of reads that receivers must make. Even Jones has reduced
the amount of reading in his offense and appears to have discarded a
few of the concepts completely, while only adjusting others. And yet,
the "reading" is what makes the Shoot the Shoot. So that is my topic
today.

I have said many times that regardless of whether you see teams run
the "Run and Shoot" per se (and I am talking about the "Run and
Shoot" as a distinct system, not just a generic term for any ol' spread
team), you will constantly see the R&S concepts and you will continue
to see them for a long time. So in this post I want to discuss one of
the most common and successful concepts, the Switch.

The Switch

The Switch is one of the Shoot mainstays, but the concept has
transcended the offense and now chunks of NFL and College playbooks
are dedicated to the "switch" - often from coaches who would
otherwise show nothing but disdain for the now supposedly discredited
offense. But to many coaches, players, and fans, the play is still
shrouded in mystery.

The concept is, at core, a two man concept. Two receivers release and
"switch": The outside guys angle inside for 5-6 yards before pushing
vertical, while the inside guy runs a "wheel route" under the outside
guy, rubs right off of his hip, and then turns up the sideline. That's
when they play gets interesting.

In the original R&S, each receiver had the five delineated options
depending on what coverage he saw. They could break it quick on
slants, run vertical routes, post routes, curls or in cuts. When it
worked it was beautiful. But sometimes, to borrow Yeats's phrase,
"thing fall apart." Or simply it took immense practice time for receivers
to get good at running the play.

Indeed, it is simpler to teach this kind of thinking when all of your

routes adjust. But it's not quite so simple if you run curl-flat as your
bread and butter play, with no reading, as many teams do. And yet.
the play thrives.

The Reads

Some coaches have installed the switch and simply eliminated the
reads entirely. This is a sound approach, and it captures the initial
beauty of the play: the "rub" the two switching receivers create
against man. And it still works as a kind of "vertical stretch" where the
two receivers can put deep defenders in a bind with one down the
sideline and another in the seam, especially if a backside receiver runs
in the seam as well.

But the play's potency is in its variance. And you can be variant
without overly complex reads. How? Here is how I suggest running the
play, as dithered from the best College, Pro, and High School minds
who use this concept.

The Routes

Below is a basic diagram of the route.

The reads are as follows:

Inside Receiver: The inside receiver will come under the outside guy
on his route, and wheel up the sideline. All he is looking for is whether
there is someone deeper than him in the deep one-third of the field.
Or, if the guy on him is playing him in man, he just asks: "He's even?
I'm leaving! (Running deep) He goin? I'm stayin." It's as simple as
deciding whether you could get open deep or not. If the defender stays
deep, the receiver will stop at 10-12 yards and settle and curl back to
the Quarterback.

Outside Receiver: The outside guy will stem his route inside and then
push up the seam. His read is simple:

- Middle of the Field Closed (I.e. Is there a single deep safety in the
middle of the field, like in Cover 3?) - Run a seam.

- Middle of the Field Open (I.e. Are there two deep safeties with no
one deep down the middle?) - Run a square in at 12 yards.

I have previously described the nuances of this MOFO/MOFC read.

Now, this might sound a bit tricky, but this is the one, core "reading"
principle that any receiver can quickly identify both before and after
the snap, and in most cases it is quite intuitive: don't run into
coverage.

Below is the route against a few coverages to show how it would play
out.

Cover 3
And Cover 2

QB Read:

The QB's read is not difficult. It is a pure progression read, though pre-
snap and post-snap he will identify 2-high and 1-high so he knows
what he's looking for. Against 1-high he will look at the F/S (deep
middle safety's) movement. He will peek for the backside seam but
read (1) inside switcher, (2) outside switcher, and (3) outlet to running
back.
Final Concerns

One of the purposes of this article was to show that this concept,
native to the Run and Shoot, can be run in many offenses. I have
shown it so far in a very Shoot friendly formation. But do not be
fooled: this route can be run by any two line of scrimmage receivers,
in nearly any offense. See the diagram below with the Switch with
play-action from the I formation. Again, you can run this from any
formation you like.

And finally, if one did adopt to their offense (or you begin to notice it
on television), there are further adjustments you can make. One of the
long-time best has been the "Switch-Smash," shown below.
On this route the outside receiver stems inside and then pushes to 12
yards before running a corner route, while the inside receiver "wheels"
out and pushes to 5-6 and then hitches back. He then delays briefly,
and if the QB does not immediately deliver the ball, he will work to find
the opposite spot or burst and lose his man to man defender. This is a
great change up, particular against a team that runs Cover 2.

Grab-Bag

As a final parting shot, I will show you a few more variations with what
you can do with this play. The concept is simple, so you can build on it
or combo it as you like.
Labels: colt brennan, football history, football techniques, hawaii, june
jones, mouse davis, offense, passing, passing concepts, reads, run and
shoot, switch