Professional Documents
Culture Documents
80%
20%
86 3
ex:DNA
WTO
50
40
30
20
10
0
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
1.
2005
35
2.
R
(Multivalent vaccines)
(multivalent)
vated vaccines )
(epitopes)
DNA DNA
b-propiolactone
DNA
DNA
BTT
DNA
(Subunit vaccines )
1.
2. (non-live vaccine)
3. DNA
4. DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
B DNA
DNA
R(synthetic peptide)
R(peptide vaccine)
36
2005
(Toxoids )
2.
(Gene-deleted vaccines )
3. (canarypox)
aroAcyacrp
4.
(Marker vaccines )
(BRSVbo-
6.
fowlpox
Mycoplasma gallisepticum
(Synthetic vaccines)
(Vector vaccines )
RNA
(parvovirus)
1.
(Edible vaccines)
2005
37
15%
20%
25%
40%
rehydrating agents
1.
33 160
10
20 2000 7
2004 32
409.35
27
40
13%
12%
29%
50%
25%
56%
7%
38
1%
7%
Animal Pharm Report, Veterinary Vaccines
2005
70
DNAA Jain
31%21.114.9
PharmaBiotech Report2005
2.9
31
(%)
70
2.9
360
14.9
380
15.7
270
11.2
50
2.1
510
21.1
30
1.2
2420
100
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
31.0
750
1,250
800
720
1,100
2002
1,250
2003
900
1,400
2004
1,850
2005
2000
2.
Merial Virbac
2002 4 2005 16
2002
2003
2004
2005
1,350
1,500
1,600
1,790
800
900
1,000
1,250
250
300
410
540
400
740
1,100
1,600
2,800
3,440
4,110
5,180
Animal Biotechnology: Technologies, Companies and Markets, A Jain PharmaBiotech Report, Nov. 2003
2005
39
2004
Merial
18.02
18.02
100%
Pfizer
525
20.15
4%
Intervet
170
13
8%
Bayer
388
10.2
8%
Wyeth
174
8.3
5%
Virbac
4.62
4.62
100%
Schering-Plough
83
7.7
9%
Boehringer Ingelheim
111.52
4%
Pfizer
1995Roche
Hoffman-La Roche
16.25Pfizer
10
Merial Pfizer
2002 9
35
Pharmacia
DSM
Pfizer 1.5 2
1996Ciba-Geigy
Pfizer 2003
Sandoz Novartis
Merck
1999 11 Intervet
(HRVet) 2000 6
Intervet Intervet
Intervet
40
2005
30
2004 6
R
2005 3
SWOT
(Strength)
(Weakness)
(Opportunity)
(Threat)
12,600
10,000
1,500
2005
41
1,200
600
1. 2004 ITIS
2. 2005 ITIS
3.
4.
5.
84,800
6.
7. Technologies, Companies and Markets Animal Bio-
12,500
technology
8. Veterinary Vaccines Animail Pharm Report
42
2005