Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ground Anchors
Both the NFIP regulations (44 CFR 60.3) and the HUD Model Manufactured Home Installation Standards (24 CFR 3285.305) require that manufactured homes installed in flood-prone or SFHAs be anchored to resist flotation, collapse, or lateral movement. Ground anchors consist of a specific anchoring assembly designed to transfer home anchoring loads to the ground (24 CFR 3285.5). They are used extensively in manufactured home installations. Ground anchors are economical, readily available, and can be installed with relatively lightweight tools and equipment. Ground anchors have potential limitations. One significant limitation arises from multiple soilanchor response mechanisms as a function of soil type, anchor depth, and load configuration. Ground anchors have historically been allowed to move up to 3 inches horizontally or 2 inches vertically as the basis for determining acceptable performance. (Appendix E of the IRC established a ground anchor moving 2 inches in the direction of pull of the load as being acceptable.) When a manufactured home is secured with ground anchors, it too can move up to 3 inches when exposed to flood, wind, or seismic events. Three inches of horizontal movement can produce eccentrically applied loads on piers under a home, which can cause the piers to topple and the home to collapse. Two inches of vertical movement can allow the home to lift and lose contact with the supporting piers. Unless the home is securely fastened to the piers and the piers constructed as monolithic units, the loss of contact can make the piers vulnerable to being displaced by moving floodwaters. Ground anchor movements of several inches can have significant negative impacts on long-term performance. In cohesive soils, such anchor movements in a vertical direction can approach or exceed the soils shear strength. In such cases, the ground anchor is supported by the soils residual shear strength, resulting in a decrease in anchor capacity. In granular soils, large lateral movements may produce failure planes that can reduce the strength on the vertical direction. Anchor assemblies, including ground anchors, should be inspected periodically, especially after hazard events. Loose anchor straps need to be retightened, and loose or failed anchors need to be reset or replaced. If movement has made the manufactured home structurally unstable, it should be reset to center it on its supporting piers. If this maintenance is not performed, the anchor assembly may fail during subsequent hazard events, resulting in significant damage to or destruction of the home. Tightening ground anchor straps typically costs a few hundred dollars or less. Replacing anchors or resetting a home is estimated to cost at least $,000.
44 CFR 60.3(a), 44 CFR 60.3(b), and 24 CFR 3285.305 use the phrase flotation, collapse or lateral movement. 44C FR 60.3(c) uses the phrase flotation, collapse and lateral movement." To account for both usages, this publication uses or.
7-
GROUND ANCHORS
7-2
GROUND ANCHORS
Most anchor heads are U shaped and contain predrilled bolt holes. The bolts connect the anchor to the homes frame or sidewalls with -inch anchor straps. Some anchors have heads with closed eyes for cable connections. The bolts in U shaped anchor heads can be used to pre-tension the anchor. Pre-tensioning an anchor with closed-eye heads requires using other devices like turnbuckles. HUD requires anchoring equipment and anchoring assemblies to be capable of resisting allowable minimum working loads of 3,50 pounds and ultimate loads of 4,725 pounds without failure of either the anchoring equipment or the attachment point on the manufactured home.
7-3
GROUND ANCHORS
recommendations of the anchor manufacturers. Table 7- depicts how one anchor manufacturer classifies soils for anchor selection.
Table 7-1. Soil Classifications Using a Standard Torque Probe (STP)
GROUND ANCHORS
be installed after the manufactured home is positioned and locates the exposed anchor heads behind the manufactured homes skirting. Anchor straps are then installed to the manufactured home frames and, in HUD Wind Zones II and III, to the wall ties installed when the home is fabricated. When used in this configuration, stabilizer plates are installed to provide additional lateral resistance for the anchor assembly.
Figure 7-4. Typical ground anchor installation.
When fastened as vertical wall ties and loaded axially, ground anchors may be used without stabilizer plates. When ground anchors are used with some proprietary foundation systems, anchors can be installed 45 degrees to the horizontal and loaded axially (Figure 7-5).
7-5
GROUND ANCHORS
Failure occurs when the stresses exceed the soil shear strength. The geometry of the failure surface varies based on the critical depth of the anchor. Ground anchors with an embedment depth less than the critical depth to anchor base width ratio ((D/B)cr) respond as a shallow foundation. Ground anchors with a depth greater than (D/B)cr respond as a deep foundation. Non-axially loaded ground anchors resist lateral movement by mobilizing the passive resistance of the surrounding soil. As small diameter rods develop little passive soil pressure resistance, stabilizer plates are used in the contact area to increase the passive resistance and reduce movement. Figure 7-6 plots anchor load (in pounds) as a function of anchor head displacement (in inches), and shows the typical response for an anchor installed vertically and loaded axially. A test load of 6,000 pounds resulted in a movement of less than 2 inches. The graph also indicates that little or no movement occurred at loads less than about 225 pounds. Vertical, axially loaded anchors are relatively efficient. The soil shear failure is a symmetrical, roughly truncated cone extended from the anchor bearing plate to the ground surface. Nonvertical, axially loaded ground anchors are somewhat less efficient due to the asymmetrical shape of the shear failure surface. The asymmetry is the result of the shallow depth at the top side of the anchor relative to the bottom side. Movements of axially loaded anchors are proportional to the applied loads. The load-movement is approximately linear in granular or non-cohesive soils. Cohesive soils tend to be less linear, particularly as the amount of clay in the soil increases. Soil related anchor failure in granular soils may occur rapidly and may cause ground surface movements around the anchor. Anchors in cohesive soil typically fail more slowly.
7-6
GROUND ANCHORS
Anchor failure may also result from weld failure between the anchor shaft and the anchor head, weld failure between the shaft and the helix, collapsing of the anchor helix, or metal tearing around the anchor head strap bolts. Anchors used with stabilizer plates respond differently than axially loaded anchors. Figure 7-7 shows the typical response for non-axially loaded anchors used with stabilizer plates. The small diameter shaft does not create much passive resistance in the soil; therefore, small loads produce relatively large movements. After the anchor shaft contacts the stabilizer plate, lateral movement as a function of load decreases significantly as a result of a larger area of passive resistance mobilized by the stabilizer plate. After the shaft contacts the stabilizer plate, stiffness, as indicated by the slope of the load vs. movement curve, increases significantly. However, the apparent stiffness, as indicated by the slope of the curve, remains less than axially loaded anchors. For both axially and non-axially loaded anchors, the design stiffness should be selected to account for the variability of individual anchor performance during anchor tests, including an assessment of the upper limit of the applicability of the stiffness factor. Shear strength in saturated soil is typically less than in non-saturated soils. Thus, anchors in saturated soils have a lower load capacity than non-saturated soils, and may exhibit decreased stiffness, especially in clays.
7-7
GROUND ANCHORS
Figure 7-7. Typical response for a non-axially loaded anchor used with a stabilizer plate.
GROUND ANCHORS
The results generally support the findings of previous research and have been used to develop the foundation designs included in this guide. The tests were conducted by representatives from FEMA and its engineering consultants, HUD, the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI), Florida Manufactured Housing Association (FMHA) and several ground anchor manufacturers (Tie Down Engineering, Oliver Technologies, Minute-Man, and Style Crest).
7-
GROUND ANCHORS
Min
1,505 1,774 1,006
Max
3,283 6,639 2,001
Average
2,426 3,801 1,475
Standard Deviation
543 1,394 294
1,019
2,612
1,721
497
817
1,614
1,197
257
Min
2,874 2,166 833
Max
9,019 6,581 1,412
Average
5,506 4,112 1,094
Standard Deviation
1,829 1,391 193
655
2,006
1,538
370
1,024
1,894
1,319
300
Note that anchor stiffness values are based on the linear portion of the load deflection data. In most cases, the non-axially loaded anchors significant movements occurred prior to reaching the linear response range. It should also be noted that the upper and lower limits of applicability of the stiffness values have not been fully evaluated. For axially loaded anchors in dry sand, the linear zone appears to exceed 6,000 pounds, about the limit of the test. Vertically loaded vertical anchors in wet sand had similar results; however, axially loaded anchors installed at 45
7-0
PROTECTING MaNufaCTuREd HOMEs fROM flOOds aNd OTHER HazaRds
A Multi-Hazard Foundation and Installation Guide
GROUND ANCHORS
degrees in wet sand had an upper limit of about 4,500 to 5,000 pounds. Similar differences were observed for inclined anchors.
Figure 7-9. Three graphics showing the anchor configurations described in Tables 72 and 7-3. From left to right, they are (a) ground anchor installed at 45 degrees and loaded axially, (b) ground anchor installed at 15 degrees from vertical and loaded 45 degrees from horizontal, and (c) ground anchor installed vertically and loaded axially.
7-
GROUND ANCHORS
The recommended design loads contained in Table 7-4 were developed by applying the statistical factors required to produce a design load that provides a 0 percent lower exclusion limit with a 0 percent confidence level. The factors were applied to the FEMA test data.
Table 7-4. Recommended Design Loads from FEMA Ground Anchor Testing Program
Recommended design stiffness values were selected that provide a 0 percent confidence level; this means that no more than 0 percent of individual anchors would provide resistances less than design values. This level of statistical performance is less conservative, but similar to statistical performance levels applied to other structural materials like steel or concrete. The lowest stiffness values from the dry and wet sites were selected for design. Generally, the dry site values controlled for axial pull anchors while the saturated site anchor values controlled for anchors using stabilizer plates. Table 7-5 lists the recommended design stiffness for the anchors tested.
Table 7-5. Recommended Design Stiffness for Tested Anchors
Controlling Soils
dry dry wet wet wet
With a 3-inch displacement, the axially loaded anchors provide working loads greater than the 3,50-pound loads required by HUD (e.g., ,200 pounds/inch x 3 inches = 3,600 pounds). However, the anchors with stabilizer plates provide only about two-thirds of the HUD required capacity. The anchor stiffness values in Table 7-5 are based on the linear portion of the load-deflection curve. Designers need to evaluate potential deflections at loads below the linear range, particularly for inclined anchors loaded non-axially.
7-2
GROUND ANCHORS
7-3