Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This
question
is
asking
you
to
cross
reference
three
sources.
What does this mean? Cross-referencing means comparing what the sources suggest/infer. When cross- referencing or comparing sources you should look for: Support between the sources - how far do they agree in what they suggest/infer? Challenge each other - how far do they differ in what they suggest/infer? You also have to cross-reference or compare the sources for reliability and typicality. What does this mean? Reliability Can you argue that knowing who produced the source (origin) and why they produced it (purpose) makes the source more or less reliable as a piece of evidence? Two sources may support each other in what they suggest but have very different purposes. An example might be a report about the success of a German bombing raid from both a (secret) British source and a German newspaper source. They may both suggest the Germans were successful in their mission however the German source will always promote a successful mission (propaganda) whereas a (secret) British one would generally want to give the simple facts knowing it would be kept from the public. . Typicality - This means comparing to what extent the sources reflect a typical or popular view of the time. An example might be peoples views on rationing during and after the war or the view that demonstrations in the 1930s over unemployment would not achieve any great change in government policy.
How do you achieve a good grade? To achieve Level 2 you are being asked to identify: to what extent the content between the sources supports each other or the Source C to what extent the content between the sources challenges each other or Source C. N.B. You need to identify at least one example of support and challenge to achieve a higher mark within Level 2. To achieve Level 3 you are being asked to: Explain the support or challenge between the reliability/typicality of the sources. Make judgements on the extent of support in content and reliability/typicality between the sources or Source C
Use judgement words or phrases such as strong support, some support, little support, no support. Level Descriptor Marks 1 Generalised yes and/or no answers without support 1-3 from the source. 2 Answers with support from the source(s) 4-7 3 Answers that, in addition, consider the degree to 8-10 which support is provided. This level also includes evaluation of sources for reliability/typicality etc.
Developing cross-referencing skills Try using different coloured highlighter pens to show the support and challenge between the contents of written sources. For example, highlight in blue in each source areas of support in what the sources are suggesting. Highlight in green areas of challenge between the two sources. For visual sources, try to write around the source what you think it is suggesting. These annotations can then be highlighted in green or blue. Similar highlighting can be done between the provenances (origin) of the sources. You could then try to complete the table below using your highlighting to help you. Before we go any further you need to be aware that there are two main ways in which the cross referencing question could be phrased: Version 1 Study Sources A, B and C How far do these sources agree about evacuation? Explain your answer, using the sources. (a slight variation on this is to ask how far the sources support the view) Version 2 Study Sources A, B and C How far do sources A and B support the evidence of Source C about evacuation? Explain your answer. We will look at Version 1 first.
This
is
the
question
posed
at
the
beginning.
Study
Sources
A,
B
and
C.
How
far
do
these
sources
agree
about
the
German
bombing
of
Coventry,
November
1940?
Explain
your
answer?
(10)
Source
A:
From
a
broadcast
on
Berlin
radio,
16
November
1940,
about
the
air
raid
on
Coventry.
More
than
500
planes
took
part
in
the
greatest
attack
in
the
history
of
aerial
warfare.
About
500
tonnes
of
high
explosive
bombs
and
30,000
incendiary
bombs
were
dropped.
In
a
short
time
all
large
and
small
factories
were
set
on
fire.
The
German
air
force
struck
a
violent
blow
in
return
for
the
British
raid
on
Munich
on
the
night
of
8
November.
Source
B:
From
a
British
newspaper,
the
Daily
Herald,
16
November
1940
Coventry
The
bombing
of
Coventry
was
as
foul
a
deed
as
Hitler
ever
ordered.
His
airmen
were
instructed:
Dont
worry
if
you
cannot
reach
your
industrial
targets.
Bomb
and
burn
the
city.
Never
mind
if
you
hit
factories.
Hit
houses.
Have
no
scruples
about
military
objectives.
Kill
men,
kill
women,
kill
children.
Destroy!
Destroy!
Destroy!
Heil
Hitler!
Heil
bloodshed!
Heil
pain!
Source
C:
The
diary
entry
from
16
November
1940
by
a
woman
who
lived
in
Coventry
during
the
bombings.
It
was
not
long
after
reaching
the
outskirts
of
Coventry
that
we
saw
evidence
of
the
raiders
visit
and
as
we
drew
nearer
the
centre
the
damage
became
greater.
We
saw
the
devastated
Rex
Cinema,
bombed
twice
over
and
the
hospital
seemed
more
damaged
than
we
expected.
This
was
deliberate
bombing
of
non-military
targets
by
the
German
brutes
to
terrify
the
ordinary
citizen
into
fright
and
submission
How do we start? First, identify what two or all three sources agree upon. A View based on Source A Source B the sources Damage caused large and small as foul a deed as factories set on Hitler ever fire ordered Military targets As above only City in general bomb and burn targeted the city
Source C nearer the centre the damage became greater devastated Rex cinema & the hospital seemed more damaged terrify the ordinary citizen into fright or bombed twice over
Big attack
greatest attack in the history of aerial warfare or struck a violent blow Negative view of Heil Hitler! Heil raid bloodshed! Heil pain!
Now
this
has
been
done,
we
need
to
consider
the
degree
to
which
support
for
these
views
is
provided.
To
do
this,
we
need
to
evaluate
the
sources
for
reliability/typicality,
etc.
Source
A
Source
B
Source
C
Source
A:
From
a
broadcast
Source
B:
From
a
Source
C:
The
diary
Provenance
on
Berlin
radio,
16
British
newspaper,
the
entry
from
16
(origin)
November
1940,
about
the
Daily
Herald,
16
November
1940
by
a
air
raid
on
Coventry.
November
1940
How reliable/typical is the source? What was its purpose? As radio was controlled by the Nazi state this broadcast is a piece of propaganda and will exaggerate impact of bombing raid for German morale purposes. It will focus on legitimate military targets such as factories and leave out civilian damage caused in order to justify raid and maintain a moral high ground. Reliable in so much as it confirms the German raid but its assertions should be questioned. British newspapers, while not run by the government, would have emphasised the effects on women and children in order to maintain peoples hatred of the Nazis. It doesnt focus on figures as this might have a negative effect on morale.
A personal account (seemingly not part of mass observation), likely to be more accurate in what is stated.
Reliable source but limited in extent to what she would have seen (not the whole city)
Level 1 response (1-3 marks) All three sources agree that the Germans bombed Coventry. The sources show that factories and houses and cinemas and hospitals were hit which means the whole city must have been bombed. Source A says that the Germans only attacked factories whereas Sources B and C say that they bombed the city in general. Source A is German which means it will be a positive about the bombing. Sources B and C are British which means they will be critical of the bombing 82 words (3 marks) a short paragraph! Level 2 Response (4-7 marks) All the sources agree that there was a great deal of damage done in the bombing raid on Coventry. Source A suggests lots of factories were destroyed all large and small factories were set on fire while Sources B and C suggest damage was done to non-military targets as source C states .. the devastated Rex Cinema, bombed twice over and the hospital . Source A praises the raid, the greatest attack in history and is suggesting German bombers only targeted industrial sites such as factories. Sources B and C criticise the raids and suggest the German bombers were deliberately targeting civilian buildings and people. As source C suggests This was deliberate bombing of non-military targets. None of the sources actually give figures to show how many people were killed although Source B implies it Kill men, kill women, kill children. 141 words (6 marks) half a page!
Level 3 Response (8-10 marks) All the sources agree that there was a great deal of damage done in the bombing raid on Coventry although they disagree on specific targets. Source A suggests lots of factories were destroyed all large and small factories were set on fire while Sources B and C suggest damage was done to non-military targets. For example source C states .. the devastated Rex Cinema, bombed twice over and the hospital . Source A praises the raid, the greatest attack in history and is suggesting German bombers only targeted industrial sites such as factories. As radio was controlled by the Nazi state this broadcast should be considered a typical piece of propaganda. This means it is likely to exaggerate the impact of bombing raid for German morale purposes. It will focus on legitimate military targets such as factories and leave out civilian damage caused in order to justify the raids and maintain a moral high ground. This source could be considered reliable in so much as it confirms the German raid but its assertions should be questioned. Sources B and C criticise the raids and suggest the German bombers were deliberately targeting civilian buildings and people. As source C suggests This was deliberate bombing of non-military targets. A personal account (seemingly not part of mass observation), could be considered more accurate in what is stated as there is no obvious motivation to distort, exaggerate or minimise the truth. In this sense, you could consider this a reliable source but limited in extent to what she would have seen (not the whole city). None of the sources actually give figures to show how many people were killed although Source B implies it Kill men, kill women, kill children. However, British newspapers, while not run by the government, would have emphasised the effects on women and children in order to maintain peoples hatred of the Nazis and in this instance not greatly reliable as a source as it lacks credible information. 329 words (10 marks) a whole page!
Now
you
have
ago.
Study
sources
B,
C
and
D.
How
far
do
these
sources
agree
about
the
Jarrow
Crusade?
Explain
your
answer.
(10
marks)
Source
C:
part
of
a
speech
given
to
the
Jarrow
marchers
by
the
reverend
Thomas
at
Northallerton.
The
town
council
had
not
sent
anyone
to
greet
them.
I
dont
think
the
decision
of
the
council
not
to
welcome
the
marchers
represents
the
feeling
of
the
people
of
Northallerton.
This
march
is
the
finest
organised
I
have
ever
seen.
It
is
our
duty
to
spare
no
effort
to
help
our
unfortunate
comrades
and
I
think
the
Churches
of
this
country
should
have
led
the
march
and
taken
it
right
to
London
as
an
appeal
not
only
to
the
Government
but
also
to
the
common
humanity
in
man.
Source
D:
A
Government
statement
made
during
the
marches.
Ministers have considered the fact that there are a number of marches on London in progress or being planned. In the opinion of the government these marches do no good for the causes they say they represent and are likely to cause the unnecessary hardship for those taking part in them. Processions to London cannot have any right in our democracy to influence government policy.
Source B
Source C
Source D
Source B
Source C
Source D
Provenance (origin)
Source B; a painting of the Jarrow Crusade, painted by art student Colin Moss in 1936. Moss came from a working-class background and believed in social reform
Source C: part of a speech given to the Jarrow marchers by the reverend Thomas at Northallerton. The town council had not sent anyone to greet them.
Study
Source
A,
B
and
C
How
far
do
these
sources
agree
about
the
level
of
morale
in
London
during
the
Blitz?
Explain
your
answer
Source
A:
From
a
school
textbook
published
in
1988
To
start
with,
the
Luftwaffe
(German
air-force)
concentrated
on
destroying
airfields
as
part
of
its
invasion
plan.
In
September,
this
policy
was
switched
to
one
of
bombing
London.
Having
failed
to
beat
the
RAF
(the
British
air-force)
Luftwaffe
planes
could
only
attack
at
night,
when
it
was
harder
for
the
RAF
to
shoot
them
down.
Bombing
cities
was
intended
to
break
the
morale
of
the
British
and
make
them
want
peace
at
any
price.
Source
B:
A
Poster
issued
by
the
government
in
1940.
Source
C:
From
the
diary
of
Maggie
Joy
Blunt,
who
lived
about
20
miles
from
London,
9
September
1940.
Raids
over
London
are
constant
and
seem
to
get
worse
and
worse.
Damage
and
death
over
the
docks
and
East
End
have
been
terrible.
But
Hitler
wont
win.
We
will
not
be
subdued.
We
will
have
a
better
world.
Damnation
to
those
who
machine-gun
our
women
and
children,
and
they
do.
Only
last
week
a
hundred
or
more
factory
girls
were
killed
in
this
way
in
their
lunch
hour
Source A
Source B
Source C
Source
A
From
a
school
textbook
published
in
1988
Source
B
A
Poster
issued
by
the
government
in
1940.
Source
C
From
the
diary
of
Maggie
Joy
Blunt,
who
lived
about
20
miles
from
London,
9
September
1940.
Provenance
(origin)
Study
Sources
A,
B
and
C
How
far
do
these
sources
agree
about
evacuation?
Explain
your
answer,
using
the
sources.
Source
A:
From
a
government
leaflet,
Evacuation,
Why
and
How,
July
1938.
If
we
were
involved
in
war,
our
big
cities
might
be
subjected
to
determined
attacks
from
the
air
-
at
any
rate
in
the
early
stages
-
and
although
our
defences
are
strong
and
are
rapidly
growing
stronger,
some
bombers
would
undoubtedly
get
through.
We
must
see
to
it
then
that
the
enemy
does
not
secure
his
chief
objects
-
the
creation
of
anything
like
panic,
or
the
crippling
dislocation
of
everyday
life.
One
of
the
first
measures
we
can
take
to
prevent
this
is
the
removal
of
the
children
from
the
more
dangerous
areas.
Source
C:
From
the
memoirs
of
Ray
Whitehurst,
2006,
who
was
evacuated
in
September
1939.
When
Bert
(aged
12),
Jean,
Reg
and
myself
were
told
we
were
being
evacuated
from
our
house
on
Osmaston
Road,
I
had
no
idea
why.
My
mother
explained
that
young
children
were
being
moved
out
of
towns
to
the
countryside
because
Hitler
and
Germany
were
now
at
war
with
us
and
we
might
get
bombed.
It
still
didnt
mean
much
to
me
but
if
Mam
said
this
was
going
to
happen
then
it
would.
Probably
my
friends
were
right
when
they
said
that
Hitler
hated
small
children
and
ate
them
at
mealtimes.
Source A
Source B
Source C
Source
A
From
a
government
leaflet,
Evacuation,
Why
and
How,
July
1938.
Source
B
A
government
poster
of
January
1940.
Source
C
From
the
memoirs
of
Ray
Whitehurst,
2006,
who
was
evacuated
in
September
1939.
Provenance
(origin)