Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To find the causes of a non-democratic Pakistan we have to analyze the situation after the 1947 but also before the 1947. The collective consciousness and psyche of a nation develops in hundreds of years. So in this essay we will study the factors which are in a sequence before and after the independence.
Use of Religion:
Muslim ruling class of India knew that their rule and power is based on Muslim community so for getting more support from them they felt it necessary to use the religion. And thus all Muslim rulers tried to be called as saver of ummah. Although practically they were bounded to run the governmental system on secular basis but they used the religion as well. They supervised Ullamah and they supported Sufis. They also implemented some religious laws which were not directly opposite of political system. At the same they created a threat in the minds of the people that if their rule is over thrown on weaken then Muslim Community from India will cease to survive. Its example could
be seen from Khilji era. When Khusro Malik named slave who was racially Indian got the rule after killing the last Khilji king Quttab-ud-Deen Mubarak, they he was propagated as Hindu and also that the life and property of Muslims was in danger. This threat gathered all the Lords under the supervision of Ghayas-ud-Deen Tughlaq. Khusro was defeated and contemporary histories told that Muslim lords felt nice that their life and preferences were saved. Its second example could be observed in Akbar regime. Akbars secular policy threatened the strict believers and they opposed Akbar on the slogan that Islam is in danger. Muslim lords wanted that only they should be awarded the part in rule and no one else should be there with whom they have to share their rule. For this case religion was used because if state is labeled Muslim then only Muslims has the right to run the state. So it was in their benefit that State should be named Islamic and that Muslim and Hindu should not be closed culturally and socially. Use of religion on such an extent hide the class contradictions within the Muslims and the common Muslim remained happy only because of the fact that they and the ruler belongs to same religion. Even till now to hide the class contradictions between the Muslim a common goal based on Islam is propagated. Aik hi saf men khary ho gae Mahmood o Ayaz is a proof of such a psyche of Muslim rulers.
After 1857:
When British rule started then Muslim ruling class had lost their power. So Sir Syed Ahmed Khan thought that Muslim should save their objectives by compromise by British rule. Sir Syed and Muslim lords were having a wish for an eternal British rule on India because they thought that only in this condition; objectives of Muslims can be saved. Descendants of Sir Syed expressed this view many times. They opposed the jobs
allotments on competition examination and representative government as they thought that it was dangerous for Muslims. In December 1906, Nawab Waqar Ul Mulk said in his speech:
Democratic system will made the minorities on the status of working class and even every name and sign of Muslims will be ceased to exist in India.
In this background Muslim educated class belonging to elites became opponents of democracy because of the threat of losing their power. In producing such an opinion their historical consciousness also took part, it was in their mind that they were the rulers and they ruled the Hindu majority with power. So they are racially superior to Hindus then how can we accept that democracy make the Hindus rulers . In 1920 Muhammad Ali Johar opposed democracy due to same reasons as stated above.
One thing should also be kept mind that these views among democracy were only of Muslim elite which had no link with common Muslims. Even in the earlier days of British rule they did not sent their children in Government schools to avoid interactions with common class Muslim children. Muslim elite due to their class objective opposed democracy. They think to status quo due to their loyalty with British government. Allama Iqbal also expressed the same views regarding democracy. His poetry also has anti-democratic contents.
After independence:
Muslim Feudal got the role of new born Pakistan. It is a principle that an authoritarian must have some strong reason close to the peoples will so that their rule could be saved. After independence, Muslim elite of Pakistan practiced the same experiment which was being practiced from Mahmood of Ghazna. The principle which stopped the democracy in Pakistan was a part of collective consciousness of Muslims of India. This 1. Threat of attack by Hindus majority state named India. 2. A strong and well equipped army for defiance. 3. Use of Religion. These points are chronologically associated and rotate under the theory of elites rule. From the very first day of independence it was taught to common Pakistanis that India is your enemy and still she is trying to make the subcontinent united. And for the same reason, she attacked Pakistan for many time. So there should be a strong army to defend Pakistan the castle of Islam.