(WWW - Indowebster.com) - Microsoft Word - TUGAS AKHIR LIFTING

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM
LIFTING ANALYSIS
APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUTION
0
B
A
REV.
ISSUED FOR APPROVAL

02/02/12
ANA
ISSUED FOR CLIENT

COMMENTS
DATE
BY
DESCRIPTION
CHECK
APPR.
APPR.
ENGINEER APPROVAL
APPR.
CONTRACTOR
COMPANY
STATUS CODE : A = Issued for comments - B = Issued for approval - C = Approved

TOTAL OR PARTIAL REPRODUCTION AND/OR UTILIZATION OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE FORBIDDEN
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF THE OWNER
DOCUMENT NUMBER
AG-03-002
CLASS
REVISION
STATUS
A
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
02/02/12
REVISION:
PAGE:
2 of 31
TABULATION OF REVISED PAGES

REVISIONS
PAGE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
A
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
REMARKS
E
APP
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
EXHI.
ATTACHMENTS
REVISIONS
PAGES
A
B
C
D
8
X
X
22
X
X
2
X
X
2
X
X
16
X
X
10
X
X
2
X
X
PAGES
REVISIONS
B
C
D
REMARKS
E
REMARKS
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
02/02/12
REVISION:
PAGE:
3 of 31
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 6
1.1 OBJECTIVE OF THE ANALYSIS.............................................................................. 6
2 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSION ........................................................................................... 7
2.1 WEIGHT SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 7
2.2 CENTRE OF GRAVITY............................................................................................. 7
2.3 MAXIMUM SLING LOAD .......................................................................................... 8
2.4 API/AISC MEMBER STRESS RATIOS ..................................................................... 9
2.5 API/AISC JOINT PUNCHING SHEAR STRESS RATIOS ....................................... 13
2.6 API/AISC JOINT MINIMUM REQUIRED STRENGTH RATIOS............................... 13
2.7 JOINT DEFLECTION .............................................................................................. 14
3 DESIGN PREMISES......................................................................................................... 15
3.1 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS .................................................................................. 15
3.2 MATERIAL .............................................................................................................. 15
3.3 COMPUTER PROGRAM ........................................................................................ 16
3.4 UNIT SYSTEM........................................................................................................ 16
4 COMPUTER MODEL........................................................................................................ 18
4.1 METHOD OF ANALYSIS ........................................................................................ 18
4.1.1 GENERAL ..................................................................................................................... 18
4.1.2 ALLOWABLE STRESS ................................................................................................. 18
4.1.3 CONTINGENCY FACTOR............................................................................................ 18
4.1.4 DYNAMIC AMPLIFICATION FACTOR ......................................................................... 19
4.1.5 CONSEQUENCE FACTOR .......................................................................................... 19
4.1.6 SKEW EFFECT............................................................................................................. 19
4.1.7 RIGGING ARRANGEMENT.......................................................................................... 19
4.1.8 COG VARIATION.......................................................................................................... 20
4.2 STRUCTURAL MODEL .......................................................................................... 22

4.2.1 GENERAL VIEW ........................................................................................................... 22
4.2.2 DESCRIPTION.............................................................................................................. 23
4.3 GLOBAL AXIS SYSTEM ......................................................................................... 23

4.4 LOCAL AXIS SYSTEM............................................................................................ 23
4.5 BOUNDARY CONDITIONS..................................................................................... 23
4.5.1 HOOK POINT................................................................................................................ 23
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
02/02/12
REVISION:
PAGE:
4 of 31
4.5.2 SLINGS ......................................................................................................................... 23

4.5.3 MODEL GLOBAL STABILITY ....................................................................................... 23
5 LOADING ......................................................................................................................... 25
5.1 ELEMENTARY LOAD DEFINITION ........................................................................ 25
5.2 COG SHIFT FORCE CALCULATION ..................................................................... 25
5.3 LOADING COMBINATIONS.................................................................................... 27
5.3.1 PRE-LOADING COMBINATION................................................................................... 27
5.3.2 LOADING COMBINATION WITHOUT CONSEQUENCE FACTOR ............................ 28
5.3.3 LOADING COMBINATION FOR MEMBER CONNECTING TO PADEYE ................... 28
5.3.4 LOADING COMBINATION FOR MEMBER NOT CONNECTING TO PADEYE .......... 29
6 ANALYSIS RESULTS....................................................................................................... 30
6.1 LOADING SUMMARY............................................................................................. 30
6.1.1 ELEMENTARY LOAD ................................................................................................... 30
6.1.2 PRE-LOADINGS AND LOADING COMBINATION....................................................... 30
6.1.3 LOADING SUMMARY AND COG................................................................................. 31
6.2 DEFLECTION PLOTS............................................................................................. 33

6.3 SLINGS LOAD ........................................................................................................ 33
6.4 MEMBER CODE CHECKS ..................................................................................... 33
6.4.1 MEMBER CONNECTED TO PADEYE......................................................................... 33
6.4.2 MEMBER NOT CONNECTED TO PADEYE ................................................................ 34
6.5 REACTION ............................................................................................................. 34

6.6 CONNECTION CODE CHECKS ............................................................................. 36
ATTACHMENTS
APPENDIX A
PADEYE DESIGN AND CALCULATION
APPENDIX B
STRUCTURAL GEOMETRY
APPENDIX C
JOINT DEFLECTION PLOTS
APPENDIX D
UNITY CHECK RATIO PLOTS
APPENDIX E
SACS INPUT FILE
APPENDIX F
SACS OUTPUT FILE
Appendix F1
Maximum Joint Deflection List
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
Appendix F2
Member Unity Check Summary
APPENDIX G
REFERENCES DRAWING
02/02/12
A
5 of 31
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
INTRODUCTION
1.1
OBJECTIVE OF THE ANALYSIS
02/02/12
A
6 of 31
The purpose of this calculation is to check the adequacy of DIESEL STORAGE to sustain the loads
that may occur during the lifting conditions, which comprise of :
The dead weight of Diesel Storage Platform
The dynamic amplification due to offshore site.
The lifting sling load distribution accounting for CoG variation and sling length inaccuracy.
The design of lifting padeyes
The calculation is based on the design data and the requirements in the Structural Design Basis ,
General Specification, General Specification for Design of Offshore Topside Structure (Ref. 7),
General Specification for Load-out, Sea-fastening, Transportation and Installation of Offshore
st
Structures (Ref. 10) & API RP2A-WSD 21 2000 Edition (Ref. 11).
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSION
2.1
WEIGHT SUMMARY
02/02/12
A
7 of 31
The detail weight summary of DIESEL lifting condition without contingency as well as with
contingency is given in the following table. Definition and detail of the loading condition is given in
chapter 5.1.
Unit : kN
Structure
DIESEL
STORAGE
Loading Condition
Actual Weight
Cont's
Actual Weight
with
Contingencies
Main Structure Self Weight

Structural Appurtenance
Diesel Storage Tanks Opt.
Diesel Fuel Transfer Pump
Piping Dry
Electrical/Instrumentations
250.760
121.691
403.081
9.808
29.200
45.112
1.15
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.25
288.374
146.030
483.697
11.770
35.040
56.390
2.2 CENTRE OF GRAVITY

The centre of gravity and origin co-ordinates are shown below :
Platform North
8.40 m
PL09
1
PL12
Diesel
Storage
DIESEL STORAGE
Deck Center
(-0.000, 0.000)
11.75 m
X
DIESEL CoG
(3.30,6.21)
2
PL03
PL06
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
02/02/12
REVISION:
PAGE:
8 of 31
The centre of gravity from SACS calculation are as follow :

CoG (m)
Structure
DIESEL STORAGE
3.30
6.21
2.3 MAXIMUM SLING LOAD

The maximum sling loads is performed with considering the 1.20 dynamic amplification factor and
shifted of centre of gravity location. The slings angles are measured between slings and the
horizontal plane (degree) see sketch below.
HOOK
POINT
Point
No.
Point
1
2
3
4
PL03
PL06
PL09
PL12
Diesel Storage
Vertical Angle()
)
Member
Degree
PL03-PL14
PL06-PL14
PL09-PL15
PL12-PL15
60
56.58
62.10
58.27
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
02/02/12
REVISION:
PAGE:
9 of 31
The maximum sling loads are shown in the table below:

Padeye on the DIESEL STORAGE:
Lifting Point Type
Attached to:
Load Case
Member
Load (kN)
Padeye
Padeye
PL03
PL06
LPA1
PL03-PL14
707.30
LPA2
PL06-PL14
523.20
Padeye
PL09
LPA3
PL09-PL14
742.50
Padaye
PL12
LPA4
PL12-PL14
574.97
From the above member sling load table, the maximum sling load DIESEL STORAGE is 742.50 kN.
Thus, this load will be used for pad-eyes design. The pad-eye design and calculation will be
explained in Appendix A in this report.
2.4
API/AISC MEMBER STRESS RATIOS

Maximum stress ratios obtained for members are :
Members connected to padeye :
The maximum interaction ratio below is checked with the consequence factor of 1.35.
Location
DIESEL
STORAGE
Member
Properties
Load
Case
UC
D006-D007
WPG01
NLP2
0.162
D007-D008
WPG01
NLP2
0.225
D008-D009
WPG01
NLP2
0.279
D009-D010
WPG01
NLP3
0.331
D009-D034
WPG01
NLP3
0.366
D010-D011
WPG01
NLP3
0.260
D011-D012
WPG01
NLP2
0.218
D012-D013
WPG01
NLP2
0.189
D013-D014
WPG01
NLP2
0.158
D014-PL06
WPG01
NLP3
0.147
D034-D048
WPG01
NLP3
0.437
D040-D054
WPG01
NLP2
0.389
D044-PL09
WPG01
NLP3
0.497
D048-D061
WPG01
NLP3
0.303
D054-PL12
WPG01
NLP2
0.360
D058-D059
WPG01
NLP4
0.208
D059-D060
WPG01
NLP4
0.279
D060-D061
WPG01
NLP3
0.315
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
D061-D062
WPG01
NLP3
0.377
D062-D063
WPG01
NLP3
0.321
D063-D064
WPG01
NLP3
0.259
D064-D065
WPG01
NLP4
0.208
D065-D066
WPG01
NLP3
0.176
D066-PL12
WPG01
NLP3
0.162
PL03-D006
WPG01
NLP1
0.168
PL06-D040
WPG01
NLP2
0.375
PL09-D058
WPG01
NLP3
0.178
D030-D044
WPG01
NLP3
0.574
PL03-D030
WPG01
NLP3
0.528
D005-PL03
W10X22
NLP3
0.34
02/02/12
A
10 of 31
Members not connected to padeye :

These member below are not connected to the lift points. These members are checked with the
consequence factor of 1.15.
Location
DIESEL
STORAGE
Member
Properties
Load
Case
UC
D003-D027
W10X22
FLP3
0.242
D004-D028
W10X22
FLP3
0.035
D005-D029
W10X22
FLP4
0.034
D006-D015
W10X22
FLP3
0.156
D007-D016
W10X22
FLP3
0.090
D008-D017
W10X22
FLP1
0.135
D010-D018
W10X22
FLP3
0.113
D011-D019
W10X22
FLP3
0.036
D012-D020
W10X22
FLP1
0.093
D013-D038
W10X22
FLP1
0.031
D014-D039
W10X22
FLP2
0.063
D015-D016
W10X22
FLP3
0.043
D015-D021
W10X22
FLP3
0.167
D016-D017
W10X22
FLP3
0.038
D016-D022
W10X22
FLP3
0.144
D017-D023
W10X22
FLP3
0.151
D018-D019
W10X22
FLP3
0.060
D018-D024
W10X22
FLP1
0.079
D019-D020
W10X22
FLP3
0.067
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
D019-D025
W10X22
FLP3
0.075
D020-D026
W10X22
FLP3
0.086
D021-D022
W10X22
FLP3
0.058
D021-D031
W10X22
FLP3
0.226
D022-D023
W10X22
FLP3
0.089
D022-D032
W10X22
FLP3
0.203
D023-D033
W10X22
FLP3
0.224
D024-D025
W10X22
FLP3
0.075
D024-D035
W10X22
FLP3
0.153
D025-D026
W10X22
FLP3
0.118
D025-D036
W10X22
FLP3
0.147
D026-D037
W10X22
FLP3
0.163
D027-D041
W10X22
FLP3
0.450
D028-D042
W10X22
FLP1
0.054
D029-D043
W10X22
FLP3
0.049
D031-D045
W10X22
FLP1
0.117
D032-D046
W10X22
FLP3
0.049
D033-D047
W10X22
FLP3
0.089
D035-D049
W10X22
FLP1
0.079
D036-D050
W10X22
FLP3
0.049
D037-D051
W10X22
FLP3
0.057
D038-D052
W10X22
FLP3
0.049
D039-D053
W10X22
FLP2
0.095
D041-D055
W10X22
FLP1
0.191
D042-D056
W10X22
FLP1
0.020
D043-D057
W10X22
FLP4
0.024
D045-D058
W10X22
FLP1
0.058
D046-D059
W10X22
FLP3
0.017
D047-D060
W10X22
FLP3
0.040
D049-D062
W10X22
FLP1
0.035
D050-D063
W10X22
FLP3
0.017
D051-D064
W10X22
FLP3
0.021
D052-D065
W10X22
FLP3
0.017
D053-D066
W10X22
FLP2
0.044
D058-D070
W10X22
FLP3
0.094
D059-D071
W10X22
FLP4
0.072
D060-D072
W10X22
FLP3
0.160
D062-D074
W10X22
FLP1
0.096
02/02/12
A
11 of 31
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
D063-D075
W10X22
FLP3
0.042
D064-D076
W10X22
FLP3
0.049
D065-D077
W10X22
FLP1
0.054
D066-D078
W10X22
FLP3
0.088
D069-D070
W10X22
FLP3
0.329
D070-D071
W10X22
FLP3
0.251
D071-D072
W10X22
FLP4
0.145
D073-D074
W10X22
FLP1
0.423
D074-D075
W10X22
FLP4
0.331
D075-D076
W10X22
FLP4
0.406
D076-D077
W10X22
FLP3
0.438
D077-D078
W10X22
FLP1
0.359
D078-D079
W10X22
FLP2
0.381
D006-D007
WPG01
FLP2
0.138
D007-D008
WPG01
FLP2
0.191
D008-D009
WPG01
FLP2
0.238
D009-D010
WPG01
FLP3
0.283
D009-D034
WPG01
FLP3
0.312
D010-D011
WPG01
FLP3
0.223
D011-D012
WPG01
FLP2
0.185
D012-D013
WPG01
FLP2
0.161
D013-D014
WPG01
FLP2
0.135
D014-PL06
WPG01
FLP3
0.126
D030-D044
WPG01
FLP3
0.489
D034-D048
WPG01
FLP3
0.372
D040-D054
WPG01
FLP2
0.331
D044-PL09
WPG01
FLP3
0.423
D048-D061
WPG01
FLP3
0.258
D054-PL12
WPG01
FLP2
0.307
D058-D059
WPG01
FLP4
0.164
D059-D060
WPG01
FLP4
0.219
D060-D061
WPG01
FLP3
0.269
D061-D062
WPG01
FLP3
0.321
D062-D063
WPG01
FLP3
0.274
D063-D064
WPG01
FLP3
0.221
D064-D065
WPG01
FLP4
0.177
D065-D066
WPG01
FLP3
0.150
D066-PL12
WPG01
FLP3
0.138
02/02/12
A
12 of 31
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
PL03-D006
WPG01
FLP1
0.143
PL03-D030
WPG01
FLP3
0.450
PL06-D040
WPG01
FLP2
0.294
PL09-D058
WPG01
FLP3
0.151
D030-D031
WPG02
FLP3
0.179
D031-D032
WPG02
FLP3
0.123
D032-D033
WPG02
FLP3
0.133
D033-D034
WPG02
FLP3
0.163
D034-D035
WPG02
FLP3
0.192
D035-D036
WPG02
FLP3
0.213
D036-D037
WPG02
FLP3
0.215
D037-D038
WPG02
FLP3
0.192
D038-D039
WPG02
FLP3
0.174
D039-D040
WPG02
FLP3
0.154
D044-D045
WPG02
FLP4
0.128
D045-D046
WPG02
FLP4
0.119
D046-D047
WPG02
FLP3
0.134
D047-D048
WPG02
FLP3
0.160
D048-D049
WPG02
FLP3
0.208
D049-D050
WPG02
FLP3
0.228
D050-D051
WPG02
FLP3
0.228
D051-D052
WPG02
FLP3
0.204
D052-D053
WPG02
FLP3
0.183
D053-D054
WPG02
FLP3
0.163
D072-D073
W10X22
FLP3
0.518
st
All member have satisfied the API RP2A WSD 21

requirements in lifting condition.
2.5
02/02/12
th
Edition / AISC 9
13 of 31
Edition code checking
API/AISC JOINT PUNCHING SHEAR STRESS RATIOS

No tubular intersection is found during structure lifting analysis. Therefore, punching shear check is
not performed in the analysis.
2.6
API/AISC JOINT MINIMUM REQUIRED STRENGTH RATIOS

No tubular intersection is found during structure lifting analysis. Therefore, joint minimum required
strength ratios is not resulted in the analysis.
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
2.7
02/02/12
A
14 of 31
JOINT DEFLECTION
The maximum joint deflection occurred on the lifting analysis (included lifting in shifted position) are
shown below :
Displacements given are relative displacements with regard to the extremities of span (mm).
Location
DIESEL
Member
Span
(l)
Properties
Deflection
Relative (d)
Load
Case
d/l
D030-D027
2.55
W21 X 62
1.6676
NLP3
0.00326
STORAGE
All deflections are acceptable, which are less than 1/360 for main beam and 1/300 for other beam
(for cantilever l design value is twice the cantilever length).
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
DESIGN PREMISES
3.1
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
02/02/12
A
15 of 31
The present analysis is carried out based on the design criteria described in the following documents
1) Document no. Design of Offshore Topside Structure
2) Document no. MTO -Structural
3) Document no. Equipment List
4) Drawings References:
a.
DIESEL STORAGE Platform Deck Framing Sheet 1
b.
DIESEL STORAGE Platform Deck Framing Sheet 1
3.1.1 Project Specification and Reports

1) Document No. Structural Design Basis
2) Document No. Platforms Weight Control Report
3.1.2 Company General Specification

3) Document No. Weight Monitoring and Weighing Offshore Units, Rev. 02.
4) Document No. Design of Offshore Topsides Structures, Rev. 02.
5) Document No. Material for Offshore Steel Structures, Rev. 01.
6) Document No. Fabrication of Offshore Steel Structures, Rev. 02.
7) Document No. Load-out, Sea-Fastening, Transportation and Installation of Offshore Structures,
Rev.01.
3.1.3 Codes and Standards

st
8) API RP2A-WSD. 21 Edition, Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Construction
Fixed Offshore Platforms 2000.
th
9) AISC 9 Edition/ASD, American Institute of Steel Construction/Allowable Stress Design 1989.
3.2
MATERIAL
All structures will be made of steel, using the following properties:
3
Steel density
: 7.850 t/m
Elastic modulus
: 205000 MPa
Poisson's ratio
: 0.3
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
02/02/12
REVISION:
16 of 31
PAGE:
Steel grades are per basic engineering drawings with the following corresponding yield stresses:
for grade S355
for grade S235
Fy = 355 MPa
thk 16 mm
Fy = 345 MPa
16 mm < thk 40 mm
Fy = 335 MPa
40 mm < thk
Fy = 235 MPa
thk 16 mm
Fy = 225 MPa
16 mm < thk 40 mm
Fy = 215 MPa
40 mm < thk
Material strength refer to general COMPANY specification of reference GS-STR-201.

See hereunder the steel category specification and yield stress.
SPECIAL CATEGORY
FIRST CATEGORY
SECOND CATEGORY
Piles
S355
Tubular OD < 12
S235
Deck leg
S355
Tubular OD > 12
S355
Tubular
S235
WPG
S355
(Web height > 600mm) (*)
WPG
S235
(Web height > 600mm) (*)
Padeyes
S355
Rolled section
S235
(Web height < 600mm) (*)
Rolled section
S235
Plates
S355
Plates
Plates
S235
S235
(*) Welded plate girder shall be preferred for web height is superior to 600mm, else rolled section
shall be used.
3.3
COMPUTER PROGRAM
The following software will be used for modelling and designing of structures :
SACS version 5.2.
This software is developed and produced by EDI (Engineering Dynamics Inc.)
The analysis uses the following co-ordinates :
X : Plant east
3.4
Y : Plant north
Z : Vertical up
UNIT SYSTEM
The following unit system shall be adopted in the SACS analysis files and design documents:
-
Great length
: in meter (member length, joint co-ordinates)
Small length
: in mm or inches (tube diameter, tube wall thickness, etc)
Forces and moments
: in kN or kNm
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
Masses
: in kg or metric tons
Stresses
: in kN/cm
Angles
: in degree
02/02/12
A
17 of 31
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
02/02/12
REVISION:
18 of 31
PAGE:
COMPUTER MODEL
4.1
METHOD OF ANALYSIS
4.1.1 General
The lifting analysis to be carried out are classical static linear analysis of a three dimensional space
frame computer model comprising the Diesel Storage main structure.
Each loading case, an equivalent linear stiffness matrix simulating the behaviour of the structure
automatically computed by the software before the structural analysis of the whole frame proceeds.
The lift arrangement is based on a hook position above the deck CoG and such that the minimum
sling angle with the horizontal is 60 (+/-) 5.
In addition to the nominal CoG position, 2 extreme positions of the CoG are investigated in a
variation along X ans 2 other positions in a variation along Y, which are equal to 10% of the Diesel
Storage dimensions, but not less than within a 2.0 m.
st
Member stress checking and joint check are performed according to API RP2A WSD 21 edition
4.1.2 Allowable Stress

Code checking is done using basic allowable stresses
4.1.3 Contingency Factor

4.1.3.1 Provisions
Gravity loads :
- equipment dry weights,
- piping dry weight,
- structural dead weight,
- Instrumentation & Electrical bulk,
- live loads,
are calculated based upon the Loading Diagrams, Equipment List and also taking into account the
latest up-dated equipment weight including the following provision:
10 %
provision on equipment dry weight is accounted for supporting structure accesses &
walkways,
15 %
provision on piping dry weight is accounted for pipe supports,
5%
provision on structural weight is accounted for stiffening & welding,
5%
provision on pile weight is accounted for welding,
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
02/02/12
REVISION:
PAGE:
19 of 31
4.1.3.2 Weight Contingencies

Contingencies are covered by applying where appropriate in the load combinations the following
contingency factors.
15 %
on main structural weight,
15 %
on secondary structural weight,
25 %
on mechanical weight,
20 %
on dry piping weight,
25 %
on bulk electrical weight,
25 %
on bulk instrumentation weight,
25 %
on itemised electrical weight,
25 %
on itemised instrumentation weight,
25 %
for safety items,
0%
on environmental loads,
0%
on live loads.
The weight contingency factor as specified above are applied on dry weight plus provision.
4.1.4 Dynamic Amplification Factor

The dynamic amplification factor is 1.20 for lifted weight more and equal than 100 tonnes.
4.1.5 Consequence Factor

A consequence factor of 1.35 is applied for the code checking of any member attached to lifting
points, as well as joints to which these members are connected for punching shear verification.
A consequence factor of 1.15 is applied for the other members and joints.
4.1.6 Skew Effect

The skew effect is applied to take into account shortening or stretching of slings. The load is factored
by 1.33 as a skew load factored (SKL) for flexible object (module) as per GS-STR-401 Section
6.2.2.5 skew load distribution for Single Hook Lifts and 1.15 skew load factored for lifting using
spreader bar
4.1.7 Rigging Arrangement

Diesel Storage is lifted with 4-off slings from a single hook point to padeyes, however Adjacent
Bridge is lifted with 2 slings from a single hook point to spreader bar and 4-off sling from spreader
bar to padeye on main deck. The hook point is managed to locate above the centre of gravity of
structure. The slings are modeled by tubular 3ODX1.45WT with a Youngs modulus of 100000
Mpa, in order to take into account slings stiffness for analysis. The minimum angle for the all slings is
60 (+/-) 5 degree. The slings arrangement is shown below.
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
02/02/12
REVISION:
PAGE:
20 of 31
4.1.8 CoG Variation

The effect of the variation of the position of the centre of gravity is investigated. The 4-off positions
are investigated in a variation along X and Y equal to 10% of the structure dimensions, but not less
than within a 2.0 m. The minimum 2.0 m CoG variations along X and Y to be used for this lifting
analysis.
CoG positions are given in the table :
Diesel Storage
CoG shifts
Longitudinal
Transversal
X (m)
Y (m)
5%
5%
0.42 < 1.00
0.5875 < 1.00
Deck dimension
Shift +/- (%)
Shifts +/- (m)
Shifts to be used
1.00
COG THEORITICAL POSITION
CoG Original
3.30
1.00
6.21
COG SHIFTED POSITIONS

CoG 1 (-,-)
2.30
5.21
CoG 2 (+,-)
4.30
5.21
CoG 3 (-,+)
2.30
7.21
CoG 4 (+,+)
4.30
7.21
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
02/02/12
REVISION:
PAGE:
21 of 31
The sketch showing the variation of CoG are shown in figure below :
3
4
Platform
North
CoG
3
1
4
2
2
CoG shifted (4 Location)
2 m x 2 m Box
The shifts of centre of gravity are obtained by applying dummy forces with zero resultant at four
joints. Dummy forces calculations are presented in Section 5.2 CoG Shift Force Calculation.
The loaded joints at Diesel Storage are node PL02, PL05, PL08 and PL11. Those loaded joints are
located at pile heads of the structures.
This is illustrated by figure below :
Diesel Storage SHIFT X
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
Diesel Storage SHIFT Y
4.2
STRUCTURAL MODEL
The computer structural model plot are shown in the Appendix B.
4.2.1 General View

The following plot shows the general model of the Diesel Storage
02/02/12
A
22 of 31
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
02/02/12
REVISION:
PAGE:
23 of 31
4.2.2 Description
The different elements included in the structural model are defined here below:
-
Structural part
Primary and secondary structures together with flooring (including the deck plating, grating, handrail,
stringers and joists) are in the structural section. Only the main structure is modelled in this report,
the other structural components will be input as uniform member load or joint load.
4.3
GLOBAL AXIS SYSTEM

Nodes of the structural model are described in a global axis system defined as follows:
4.4
The origin of the global axis system is taken at the Chart Datum/LAT and comes up to the centre
of the main deck legs.
Z is vertical from the Chart Datum/LAT
Y is horizontal parallel to the platform north
X is horizontal parallel to the platform east
LOCAL AXIS SYSTEM

Each member of the structural model has its own local axis system in which calculated internal
forces and moments are expressed. It can also be used to introduce loads on the members.
4.5
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
4.5.1 Hook Point

The hook point is modelled using 1-off node, as explained in section 4.1.6 Skew Effect. Basically,
this node is fixed for the 6 degrees of freedom.
4.5.2 Slings
All slings are released in local moment Y and Z at hook end point an in moment X, Y, and Z at the
other end, to present the shear force and moment generation.
4.5.3 Model Global Stability

To avoid the numerical instability, joint PL02 of Diesel Storage is fixed in horizontal X and Y-axis
displacement, however, joints PL11 of Diesel Storage is fixed in horizontal X-axis displacement.
Hook point is fixed in 6 degree of freedom. See figure below.
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
02/02/12
REVISION:
PAGE:
24 of 31
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
02/02/12
A
25 of 31
LOADING
The loading diagram shown in the Appendix A has been used to establish the loading.
5.1
ELEMENTARY LOAD DEFINITION

Elementary loads to be considered are summarised in the table below. Description of each loading
type is detailed thereafter.
Discipline of loads
Structure
Loading
name
Structural
Diesel Storage
Equipment
Balancing Forces (couple)
5.2
Description
Structural Self Weight
Structural Appurtenance
Diesel Storage Tank Operation
Diesel Fuel Transfer Pump
Piping Dry
Electrical/Instrumentations
+X
Enforce loads along X direction
+Y
Enforce loads along Y direction
COG SHIFT FORCE CALCULATION

Diesel Storage Platform
The CoG shift forces are applied at the joints connecting slings to boat landing. Those forces allow
for enforced shifting of CoG.
The load +X causes the shift of the CoG along X :
2 x F+x x Lx = Fz x x
F+x = (Fz x x) / (2 x Lx)
F+x = (1021.30 x 1.00) / (2 x 8.4) = 60.79 kN
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
These load are applied at :

Node PL05
Node PL11
Node PL02
Node PL08
-60.79 kN
-60.79 kN
60.79 kN
60.79 kN
The load +Y causes the shift of the CoG along Y:
2 x F+y x Ly = Fz x y
F+y = (Fz x y) / (2 x Ly)
F+y = (1021.30 x 1.00) / (2 x 11.75) = 43.46 kN
These load are applied at :

Node PL08
Node PL02
Node PL11
Node PL05
-43.46 kN
43.46 kN
-43.46 kN
43.46 kN
This is illustrated by figure below :
Load Condition +X Enforce Loads along X Direction
02/02/12
A
26 of 31
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
02/02/12
REVISION:
PAGE:
27 of 31
Load Condition +Y Enforce Loads along Y Direction
The resultants of these forces are equal to zero in order to keep the same weight of the boat landing.
5.3
LOADING COMBINATIONS
5.3.1 Pre-loading Combination

Prior to make a load combination, the pre-loading combination is required to easier to make load
combination.
The pre-loading combination definition are shown below:
Load Label
WGHT
Description
Lift weight with contingencies
DAF
Lift weight with contingencies and dynamic amplification factor
NLP
Lift weight with contingencies, DAF and 1.35 consequence factor
FLP
Lift weight with contingencies, DAF and 1.15 consequence factor
The pre-loading combination factor are shown in the table below:

Loading
Description
WGHT
Structural Self Weight
1.1500
Structural Appurtunances
1.1500
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
Loading
DAF
WGHT
1.20
Loading
PAD
NPAD
DAF
1.350
1.150
02/02/12
A
28 of 31
The loading combination for CSF (common solution file) module will be explained below:
The loading definition:
Loading Type
Definition
Loading 0
Origin position with 1.33 skew load factor
Loading 1
Shift 1 with 1.33 skew load factor
Loading 2
Shift 2 with 1.33 skew load factor
The final result will be a combination of all shifted condition and origin position both for 1.15
consequence factor, 1.35 consequence factor and no consequence factor.
5.3.2 Loading Combination without Consequence Factor

The load factors to be used in the load combination are as follows:
Diesel Storage module
Loading
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
DAF
1.330
1.330
1.330
1.330
1.330
+X
-1.330
1.330
-1.330
1.330
+Y
-1.330
-1.330
1.330
1.330
5.3.3 Loading Combination for Member Connecting to Padeye

The corresponding factors to be applied for maximum slings load are:
For +X = 1.33 x 1.35
= 1.7955
For +Y = 1.33 x 1.35
= 1.7955
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
02/02/12
REVISION:
PAGE:
29 of 31
Loading combination with contingencies, DAF, consequence factor have 1.35 and skew effect
Loading
NLP0
NLP1
NLP2
NLP3
NLP4
DAF
1.330
1.330
1.330
1.330
1.330
+X
-1.7955
1.7955
-1.7955
1.7955
+Y
-1.7955
-1.7955
1.7955
1.7955
5.3.4 Loading Combination for Member not Connecting to Padeye

The corresponding factors to be applied for maximum slings load are:
For +X = 1.33 x 1.15
= 1.5295
For +Y = 1.33 x 1.15
= 1.5295
Loading combination with contingencies, DAF, consequence factor of 1.15 and skew effect
Loading
FLP0
FLP1
FLP2
FLP3
FLP4
DAF
1.330
1.330
1.330
1.330
1.330
+X
-1.5295
1.5295
-1.5295
1.5295
+Y
-1.5295
-1.5295
1.5295
1.5295
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
ANALYSIS RESULTS
6.1
LOADING SUMMARY
02/02/12
A
30 of 31
6.1.1 Elementary Load
LOAD
CASE
LOAD
LABEL
****** SEASTATE BASIC LOAD CASE SUMMARY ******

RELATIVE TO MUDLINE ELEVATION
FY
FZ
MX
MY
FX
(KN)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
4
6
7
8
+X
+Y
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
(KN)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
(KN)
-270.806
-121.691
-403.081
-9.808
-29.200
-45.112
0.000
0.000
(KN-M)
-1646.483
-824.616
-2511.194
-10.789
-171.551
-286.236
0.000
-1021.310
(KN-M)
958.230
298.242
1370.475
15.693
111.103
156.214
1021.272
0.000
MZ
DEAD LOAD
(KN-M)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
6.1.2 Pre-Loadings and Loading Combination

G0 Position
LOAD
CASE
LOAD
LABEL
FX
(KN)
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
WGHT
DAF
PAD
NPAD
FLP0
NLP0
LPA0
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
***** SEASTATE COMBINED LOAD CASE SUMMARY *****

FY
FZ
MX
MY
(KN)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
(KN)
-1021.301
-1225.561
-1654.507
-1409.395
-1874.495
-2200.494
-1629.996
(KN-M)
-343.823
-412.588
-556.994
-474.476
-631.053
-740.802
-548.742
(KN-M)
MZ
(KN-M)
-914.429
-1097.315
-1481.375
-1261.912
-1678.343
-1970.229
-1459.429
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Dari saclst.cog0ta , keyword : combined load
G1 Position
LOAD
CASE
LOAD
LABEL

FY
FZ
MX
MY
FX
(KN)
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
WGHT
DAF
PAD
NPAD
FLP1
LPA1
NLP1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
(KN)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
(KN)
-1044.353
-1253.224
-1691.852
-1441.208
-1916.806
-1666.788
-2250.164
(KN-M)
-5451.721
-6542.066
-8831.789
-7523.376
-10006.090
-8700.947
-11746.279
(KN-M)
2430.575
2916.690
3937.532
3354.194
4461.078
3879.198
5236.917
MZ
(KN-M)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
G2 Position
LOAD
CASE
LOAD
LABEL
FX
(KN)
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
WGHT
DAF
PAD
NPAD
FLP2
LPA2
NLP2
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

FY
FZ
MX
MY
(KN)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
(KN)
-1044.167
-1253.000
-1691.550
-1440.950
-1916.463
-1666.490
-2249.761
(KN-M)
-5450.696
-6540.836
-8830.129
-7521.961
-10004.209
-8699.312
-11744.071
(KN-M)
4493.386
5392.063
7279.286
6200.873
8247.161
7171.444
9681.450
MZ
(KN-M)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
(KN)
270.806
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
BUOYANCY
(KN)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
02/02/12
REVISION:
31 of 31
PAGE:
G3 Position
LOAD
CASE
LOAD
LABEL
FX
(KN)
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
WGHT
DAF
PAD
NPAD
FLP3
LPA3
NLP3
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

FY
FZ
MX
MY
(KN)
(KN)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
(KN-M)
-1044.416
-1253.299
-1691.954
-1441.294
-1916.921
-1666.888
-2250.299
-7513.909
-9016.691
-12172.533
-10369.195
-13791.029
-11992.199
-16189.469
(KN-M)
2430.776
2916.932
3937.858
3354.472
4461.447
3879.519
5237.352
MZ
(KN-M)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
G4 Position
LOAD
CASE
LOAD
LABEL
FX
(KN)
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
WGHT
DAF
PAD
NPAD
FLP4
LPA4
NLP4
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000

FY
FZ
MX
MY
(KN)
(KN)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
(KN-M)
-1044.230
-1253.076
-1691.652
-1441.037
-1916.580
-1666.591
-2249.898
-7512.673
-9015.209
-12170.532
-10367.490
-13788.762
-11990.228
-16186.808
(KN-M)
4493.654
5392.386
7279.721
6201.244
8247.654
7171.873
9682.028
MZ
(KN-M)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
6.1.3 Loading Summary and CoG

G0 Position
LOAD
CASE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
LOAD
LABEL
1
2
4
6
7
8
WGHT
DAF
PAD
NPAD
FLP0
NLP0
LPA0
************* SEASTATE LOAD CASE CENTER REPORT *************

RELATIVE TO STRUCTURAL ORIGIN
********* Y - DIRECTION *********
********* Z - DIRECTION *********
FORCE
X
Y
Z
FORCE
X
Y
Z
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
********* X - DIRECTION *********

FORCE
X
Y
Z
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-270.67
-121.69
-403.08
-9.81
-29.20
-45.11
-1044.19
-1253.03
-1691.59
-1440.99
-1916.51
-2249.82
-1666.53
3.57
2.45
3.40
1.60
3.80
3.46
3.32
3.32
3.32
3.32
3.32
3.32
3.32
6.11
6.78
6.23
1.10
5.88
6.35
6.21
6.21
6.21
6.21
6.21
6.21
6.21
7.84
7.48
7.30
7.67
7.33
7.49
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
G1 Position
LOAD
CASE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
LOAD
LABEL
1
2
4
6
7
8
+X
+Y
WGHT
DAF
PAD
NPAD
FLP1
LPA1
NLP1

********* Y - DIRECTION *********
********* Z - DIRECTION *********
FORCE
X
Y
Z
FORCE
X
Y
Z
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
********* X - DIRECTION *********

FORCE
X
Y
Z
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-270.81
-121.69
-403.08
-9.81
-29.20
-45.11
COUPLE
COUPLE
-1044.35
-1253.22
-1691.85
-1441.21
-1916.81
-1666.79
-2250.16
3.54
2.45
3.40
1.60
3.80
3.46
0.02
0.02
2.33
2.33
2.33
2.33
2.33
2.33
2.33
6.08
6.78
6.23
1.10
5.88
6.35
0.03
0.03
5.22
5.22
5.22
5.22
5.22
5.22
5.22
7.85
7.48
7.30
7.67
7.33
7.49
0.03
0.03
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
02/02/12
REVISION:
PAGE:
32 of 31
G2 Position
********* Y - DIRECTION *********
********* Z - DIRECTION *********
FORCE
X
Y
Z
FORCE
X
Y
Z
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
LOAD LOAD
CASE LABEL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
********* X - DIRECTION *********

FORCE
X
Y
Z
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
1
2
4
6
7
8
+X
+Y
WGHT
DAF
PAD
NPAD
FLP2
LPA2
NLP2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-270.64
-121.69
-403.08
-9.81
-29.20
-45.11
COUPLE
COUPLE
-1044.17
-1253.00
-1691.55
-1440.95
-1916.46
-1666.49
-2249.76
3.61
2.45
3.40
1.60
3.80
3.46
0.02
0.02
4.30
4.30
4.30
4.30
4.30
4.30
4.30
6.08
6.78
6.23
1.10
5.88
6.35
0.03
0.03
5.22
5.22
5.22
5.22
5.22
5.22
5.22
7.84
7.48
7.30
7.67
7.33
7.49
0.03
0.03
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
G3 Position
LOAD
CASE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
LOAD
LABEL
1
2
4
6
7
8
+X
+Y
WGHT
DAF
PAD
NPAD
FLP3
LPA3
NLP3

********* Y - DIRECTION *********
********* Z - DIRECTION *********
FORCE
X
Y
Z
FORCE
X
Y
Z
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
********* X - DIRECTION *********

FORCE
X
Y
Z
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-270.86
-121.69
-403.08
-9.81
-29.20
-45.11
COUPLE
COUPLE
-1044.42
-1253.30
-1691.95
-1441.29
-1916.92
-1666.89
-2250.30
3.54
2.45
3.40
1.60
3.80
3.46
0.02
0.02
2.33
2.33
2.33
2.33
2.33
2.33
2.33
6.14
6.78
6.23
1.10
5.88
6.35
0.03
0.03
7.19
7.19
7.19
7.19
7.19
7.19
7.19
7.85
7.48
7.30
7.67
7.33
7.49
0.03
0.03
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
G4 Position
LOAD
CASE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
LOAD
LABEL
1
2
4
6
7
8
+X
+Y
WGHT
DAF
PAD
NPAD
FLP4
LPA4
NLP4

********* Y - DIRECTION *********
********* Z - DIRECTION *********
FORCE
X
Y
Z
FORCE
X
Y
Z
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
********* X - DIRECTION *********

FORCE
X
Y
Z
(KN)
(M)
(M)
(M)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-270.70
-121.69
-403.08
-9.81
-29.20
-45.11
COUPLE
COUPLE
-1044.23
-1253.08
-1691.65
-1441.04
-1916.58
-1666.59
-2249.90
3.61
2.45
3.40
1.60
3.80
3.46
0.02
0.02
4.30
4.30
4.30
4.30
4.30
4.30
4.30
6.14
6.78
6.23
1.10
5.88
6.35
0.03
0.03
7.19
7.19
7.19
7.19
7.19
7.19
7.19
7.84
7.48
7.30
7.67
7.33
7.49
0.03
0.03
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.50
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
6.2 DEFLECTION PLOTS

See Appendix C Deflection Output Plots
6.3
SLINGS LOAD
SACS-IV SYSTEM
MEMBER
NUMBER
MEMBER
END
PL03-PL14
MEMBER FORCES AND MOMENTS
GROUP LOAD
ID
CASE
PL03
PL06
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
544.96
707.30
508.88
584.06
372.11
552.80
715.14
516.72
591.90
379.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-5.46
-6.80
-5.16
-5.20
-4.19
-9.99
-10.47
-9.51
-10.07
-9.59
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-108.62
-116.12
-102.10
-109.43
-101.93
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
ROD
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
352.17
315.19
523.20
168.69
387.57
360.01
323.03
531.04
176.53
395.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-1.69
-4.14
-2.87
3.74
-3.11
-6.86
-9.30
-7.14
-2.34
-8.45
0.00
-0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-62.43
-98.00
-69.39
10.75
-85.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
ROD
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
583.47
622.73
415.02
742.50
547.73
591.31
630.57
422.86
750.34
555.57
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.91
3.12
3.21
2.52
2.81
-1.24
-1.34
-1.83
-0.76
-1.22
-0.01
-0.01
-0.01
0.00
-0.01
-0.01
-0.01
-0.01
0.00
-0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
11.50
12.45
9.93
11.61
10.92
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
ROD
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
407.62
228.58
444.15
370.46
574.97
415.46
236.42
451.99
378.31
582.81
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.12
5.10
1.88
-3.31
1.47
-3.73
-0.66
-3.09
-8.21
-2.46
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-18.68
33.56
-8.72
-82.70
-6.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
PL14
PL09-PL14
PL09
PL14
PL12-PL14
PL12
PL14
6.4
******************* KN-M ********************

MOMENT(X)
MOMENT(Y)
MOMENT(Z)
ROD
PL14
PL06-PL14
******************** KN *********************
FORCE(X)
FORCE(Y)
FORCE(Z)
MEMBER CODE CHECKS
6.4.1 Member Connected to Padeye

* * *
M E M B E R
G R O U P
S U M M A R Y
* * *
API RP2A 21ST/AISC 9TH
GRUP CRITICAL LOAD

ID
MEMBER
COND
MAX.
DIST
UNITY
FROM
CHECK
END
M
EFFECTIVE
* APPLIED STRESSES *
AXIAL BEND-Y BEND-Z
N/MM2
N/MM2
N/MM2
*** ALLOWABLE STRESSES ***
CRIT
AXIAL
COND
N/MM2
EULER BEND-Y BEND-Z

N/MM2
N/MM2
N/MM2
02/02/12
LENGTHS
KLY
KLZ
CM
* VALUES *
Y
B01 D005-PL03 NLP3
0.34
0.2
-0.04 -41.67 -34.48
174.151774.56 234.30 266.25
C<.15
5.3
0.2
0.85
0.85
B02 D072-D073 NLP3
0.61
0.8
-1.38 -35.78
64.33
133.431914.79 155.10 176.25
C<.15
2.1
0.8
0.85
0.85
G01 D030-D044 NLP3
0.57
0.0
-9.74
99.39
13.71
175.28 463.73 213.00 266.25
C<.15
7.6
4.6
0.85
0.85
G02 D050-D051 NLP3
0.27
0.2
-0.50
54.66
-8.18
149.795116.35 234.30 266.25
C<.15
3.4
0.9
0.85
0.85
P02 PL02-PL03 NLP1
0.04
1.5
5.10
5.05
1.45
207.00 954.13 258.75 258.75
TN+BN
7.0
1.5
0.85
0.85
33 of 31
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
02/02/12
REVISION:
34 of 31
PAGE:
6.4.2 Member Not Connected to Padeye

* * *
GRUP CRITICAL LOAD

ID
MEMBER
COND
M E M B E R G R O U P S U M M A R Y
API RP2A 21ST/AISC 9TH
MAX.
DIST
UNITY
FROM
* APPLIED STRESSES *
CHECK
END
AXIAL BEND-Y BEND-Z
* * *
EFFECTIVE
N/MM2
N/MM2
N/MM2
*** ALLOWABLE STRESSES ***
CRIT
AXIAL
COND
N/MM2
EULER BEND-Y BEND-Z

N/MM2
N/MM2
N/MM2
LENGTHS
CM
* VALUES *
KLY
KLZ
0.85
B01 D005-PL03 FLP3
0.29
0.2
-0.04 -35.49 -29.38
174.151774.56 234.30 266.25
C<.15
5.3
0.2
0.85
B02 D072-D073 FLP3
0.52
0.8
-1.18 -30.48
54.80
133.431914.79 155.10 176.25
C<.15
2.1
0.8
0.85
0.85
G01 D030-D044 FLP3
0.49
0.0
-8.30
84.67
11.68
175.28 463.73 213.00 266.25
C<.15
7.6
4.6
0.85
0.85
G02 D050-D051 FLP3
0.23
0.2
-0.43
46.56
-6.97
149.795116.35 234.30 266.25
C<.15
3.4
0.9
0.85
0.85
P02 PL02-PL03 FLP1
0.04
1.5
4.35
4.31
1.24
207.00 954.13 258.75 258.75
TN+BN
7.0
1.5
0.85
0.85
6.5 REACTION
Reaction force without consequence factor
SACS-IV SYSTEM
JOINT LOAD
NUMBER CASE
REACTION FORCES AND MOMENTS

********************* KN ********************
FORCE(X)
FORCE(Y)
FORCE(Z)
******************** KN-M *******************

MOMENT(X)
MOMENT(Y)
MOMENT(Z)
PL02
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
3.418
4.688
4.755
0.844
3.809
9.930
16.313
11.046
2.264
10.132
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
PL11
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
-2.084
-2.004
-3.475
0.199
-3.548
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
PL14
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
-1.334
-2.684
-1.280
-1.043
-0.262
-9.930
-16.313
-11.046
-2.264
-10.132
1666.527
1666.781
1666.483
1666.881
1666.584
-140.304
-206.159
-134.190
-57.032
-164.503
-7.189
-8.864
11.995
-31.392
-1.931
0.001
-0.013
0.000
0.022
-0.004
SACS-IV SYSTEM
REACTION FORCES AND MOMENTS SUMMARY
*** MOMENTS SUMMED ABOUT ORIGIN ***
LOAD
CASE
LPA0
LPA1
LPA2
LPA3
LPA4
********************* KN ********************
FORCE(X)
FORCE(Y)
FORCE(Z)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1666.527
1666.781
1666.483
1666.881
1666.584
******************** KN-M *******************

MOMENT(X)
MOMENT(Y)
MOMENT(Z)
10344.642
10367.688
10365.754
10325.237
10323.564
-5524.963
-5545.938
-5504.899
-5546.360
-5505.227
0.000
-13.629
12.326
-3.307
9.870
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
REVISION:
PAGE:
Reaction force with consequence factor of 1.15

SACS-IV SYSTEM
JOINT LOAD
NUMBER CASE
********************* KN ********************
FORCE(X)
FORCE(Y)
FORCE(Z)
******************** KN-M *******************

MOMENT(X)
MOMENT(Y)
MOMENT(Z)
PL02
FLP0
FLP1
FLP2
FLP3
FLP4
3.931
5.394
5.468
0.972
4.379
11.420
18.765
12.707
2.600
11.650
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
PL11
FLP0
FLP1
FLP2
FLP3
FLP4
-2.396
-2.304
-3.999
0.232
-4.081
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
PL14
FLP0
FLP1
FLP2
FLP3
FLP4
-1.535
-3.090
-1.469
-1.204
-0.297
-11.420
-18.765
-12.707
-2.600
-11.650
1916.532
1916.816
1916.474
1916.932
1916.590
-161.353
-237.081
-154.307
-65.595
-189.195
-8.268
-10.194
13.795
-36.102
-2.219
0.001
-0.015
0.000
0.026
-0.005
SACS-IV SYSTEM
LOAD
CASE
FLP0
FLP1
FLP2
FLP3
FLP4
********************* KN ********************
FORCE(X)
FORCE(Y)
FORCE(Z)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1916.532
1916.816
1916.474
1916.932
1916.590
******************** KN-M *******************

MOMENT(X)
MOMENT(Y)
MOMENT(Z)
11896.505
11923.021
11920.797
11874.091
11872.165
-6353.801
-6377.944
-6330.642
-6378.428
-6331.019
0.000
-15.675
14.175
-3.804
11.352
Reaction force with consequence factor of 1.35

SACS-IV SYSTEM
JOINT LOAD
NUMBER CASE
********************* KN ********************
FORCE(X)
FORCE(Y)
FORCE(Z)
******************** KN-M *******************

MOMENT(X)
MOMENT(Y)
MOMENT(Z)
PL02
NLP0
NLP1
NLP2
NLP3
NLP4
4.614
6.330
6.419
1.140
5.141
13.406
22.026
14.915
3.054
13.677
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
PL11
NLP0
NLP1
NLP2
NLP3
NLP4
-2.813
-2.706
-4.693
0.270
-4.790
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
PL14
NLP0
NLP1
NLP2
NLP3
NLP4
-1.800
-3.624
-1.726
-1.410
-0.351
-13.406
-22.026
-14.915
-3.054
-13.677
2249.827
2250.166
2249.764
2250.302
2249.901
-189.411
-278.313
-181.149
-76.996
-222.087
-9.706
-11.966
16.194
-42.380
-2.606
0.001
-0.018
0.000
0.030
-0.006
SACS-IV SYSTEM
LOAD
CASE
NLP0
NLP1
NLP2
NLP3
NLP4
********************* KN ********************
FORCE(X)
FORCE(Y)
FORCE(Z)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
2249.827
2250.166
2249.764
2250.302
2249.901
******************** KN-M *******************

MOMENT(X)
MOMENT(Y)
MOMENT(Z)
13965.368
13996.496
13993.885
13939.126
13936.867
02/02/12
-7458.742
-7487.070
-7431.619
-7487.639
-7432.062
0.000
-18.402
16.640
-4.464
13.326
35 of 31
DATE:

LIFTING ANALYSIS
02/02/12
REVISION:
PAGE:
36 of 31
6.6 CONNECTION CODE CHECKS

Since no tubular intersection is found during lifting analysis, joint can analysis is not
performed in this calculation.

(WWW - Indowebster.com) - Microsoft Word - TUGAS AKHIR LIFTING

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

(WWW - Indowebster.com) - Microsoft Word - TUGAS AKHIR LIFTING

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

ISSUED FOR APPROVAL

ISSUED FOR CLIENT

STATUS CODE : A = Issued for comments - B = Issued for approval - C = Approved

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

TABULATION OF REVISED PAGES

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

4.2 STRUCTURAL MODEL .......................................................................................... 22

4.3 GLOBAL AXIS SYSTEM ......................................................................................... 23

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

4.5.2 SLINGS ......................................................................................................................... 23

6.2 DEFLECTION PLOTS............................................................................................. 33

6.5 REACTION ............................................................................................................. 34

PADEYE DESIGN AND CALCULATION

JOINT DEFLECTION PLOTS

UNITY CHECK RATIO PLOTS

SACS INPUT FILE

SACS OUTPUT FILE

Maximum Joint Deflection List

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

Member Unity Check Summary

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

OBJECTIVE OF THE ANALYSIS

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

Main Structure Self Weight

2.2 CENTRE OF GRAVITY

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

The centre of gravity from SACS calculation are as follow :

2.3 MAXIMUM SLING LOAD

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

The maximum sling loads are shown in the table below:

API/AISC MEMBER STRESS RATIOS

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

Members not connected to padeye :

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

All member have satisfied the API RP2A WSD 21

Edition code checking

API/AISC JOINT PUNCHING SHEAR STRESS RATIOS

API/AISC JOINT MINIMUM REQUIRED STRENGTH RATIOS

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

DIESEL STORAGE Platform Deck Framing Sheet 1

DIESEL STORAGE Platform Deck Framing Sheet 1

3.1.1 Project Specification and Reports

3.1.2 Company General Specification

3.1.3 Codes and Standards

9) AISC 9 Edition/ASD, American Institute of Steel Construction/Allowable Stress Design 1989.

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

for grade S235

Material strength refer to general COMPANY specification of reference GS-STR-201.

: in meter (member length, joint co-ordinates)

: in mm or inches (tube diameter, tube wall thickness, etc)

Forces and moments

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

4.1.2 Allowable Stress

4.1.3 Contingency Factor

provision on piping dry weight is accounted for pipe supports,

provision on structural weight is accounted for stiffening & welding,

provision on pile weight is accounted for welding,

SEASTATE BASIC LOAD CASE SUMMARY

* SEASTATE COMBINED LOAD CASE SUMMARY *