Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Todays Presenters
Sarah Wallace
Analyst Heavy Reading
Mitchell H. Auster
Senior Advisor Market Development Ciena
David White
Senior VP Global Business Development Ipanema Technologies
Why service providers are unique in offering cloud services What challenges may come in preparing their networks to offer cloud-based services
How cloud computing increases the complexity of enterprise WANs How MPLS is a 15-year old technology and under threat of revenue erosion from enterprise IT transformations and a commoditization of MPLS services
solutions?
Why Cloud
Increased Storage - Organizations can store more data than on private computer systems
FourSquare
Hootsuite
Quora
SCVNGR
Amazon reports trouble due to excessive re-mirroring of its Elastic Block Storage (EBS) volumes and that a networking event caused a domino effect across availability zones in that region, in which many of its storage volumes created new backups of themselves. That filled up Amazons available storage capacity and prevented some sites from accessing their data.
solutions?
INFRASTRUCTURE
STORAGE
MANAGEMENT
Use the existing network infrastructure to offer value added services Offer new cloud services using traditional data transport Meanwhile, delivering all these cloud services in an environment that is: Secure Scalable In real-time Reliable
The Key
The key for service providers who want to provide superior cloud services will be to:
Have Superior WAN Optimization and Management
www.ciena.com
Key Messages
The ability to place and/or migrate workloads (VMs) in arbitrary data centers improves resiliency, efficiency and application performance
Before migrating a VM, the associated data store must be reachable at new DC Trend to active-active data replication among 2 or more DCs
The ability to migrate a Live VM is becoming table stakes Minimizing interruption (pause) is critical The cloud backbone network is a critical determinant of success
Transactional
Semipermanent
Medium
Short-to-Long
Low
Medium
Low
Disaster avoidance, DC consolidation or geographic re-location ~5000 VMs @ 20 GB 100 TB (~10x to move datastore) Workload balancing capacity, follow sun/moon, power cost ~500 VMs @ 20 GB 10 TB (~10x to move datastore) Cloudbursting for capacity enhancement ~50 VMs @ 20 GB 1 TB (~10x to move datastore)
High Peak-to-Valley pairwise DC-DC bandwidth demand, especially driven by high-bw, short-medium duration, QoS-sensitive flows
13
Ciena Confidential and Proprietary
VM Migration Performance
Effects of Latency, Loss, Bandwidth
VMM Completion Time (secs)
600 500 400
300
200 100 0 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 10 20 50
500
0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Loss % 0.4 0.5 1
Latency (ms)
Completion time increases with network latency Frame loss rapidly compounds the effect of network latency
100
14
Cloud backbone must deliver high bandwidth, and minimize loss & latency
General purpose IP/MPLS Core (typical 99.95% PDR) ill-suited for certain Inter-DC traffic TCP Throughput vs. PDR [RFC 5348]
4500
4000
RTT = 1ms RTT = 2ms RTT = 5ms RTT = 10ms
3500
Congestion
X
500
0
Enterprise DC
X3
Compute Storage
Provider DC 2 (Distant)
Compute Storage
X1
New workload
X2
Provider DC 1 (Local)
Compute
Storage
X3
User
Provider DC N (Distant)
X1 = no capacity available, need to burst to provider IaaS cloud service X2 = no capacity available at local provider DC X3 = insufficient bandwidth/QoS to migrate live VMs/storage to distant DCs
DC-B
CBE
Any-to-Any
Virtualized Workloads
VM VM VM
CBE
DC-C
Point-to-Point Static and OnDemand
CBE
DC-A
Static/Semi-permanent
Transactional
17
Enterprise DC
Compute Storage
Provider DC 2 (Distant)
X1
New workload
X2
Compute
Storage
Storage
User
Provider DC N (Distant)
X1 = no capacity available, need to burst to provider IaaS cloud service X2 = no capacity available at local provider DC
= performance on-demand to migrate VMs/storage to distant DCs and provide user-to-vApp QoS
Minimize capacity required; maximize resource utilization & maximize 18 fulfilled demand Anywhere, anytime provision of resources
Ciena Confidential and Proprietary
Disparate DCs/Resources
DC 1
DC 3
DC 6
DC 2
DC 4 DC 7 DC 8 DC 9 DC 10
DC 10 DC 8 DC 4
DC 9
DC 5
DC 11
DC 5
DC 6
DC 7 DC 2 DC 1 DC 3 DC 11
19
but how to address the high peak-to-valley pairwise DC-DC bandwidth demand?
<5% of time High: NxY Gbps Cloudburst live VM, storage migration >95% of time Low: Y Mbps
build full fixed mesh for sum of each pairwise daily peak? build stat-mux mesh for daily peak sum of total forecast demands?
20
Window 2 peaks
DC
Window 3 peaks
DC
Window 4 peaks
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
Sum = X Tbps
Sum = 2X Tbps
High pairwise (DCa DCz) peak-to-valley (& mean) ToD bandwidth variation
How to build?
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
21
Window 2 peaks
DC
Window 3 peaks
DC
Window 4 peaks
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
Sum = X Tbps
Sum = 2X Tbps
High pairwise (DCa DCz) peak-to-valley (& mean) ToD bandwidth variation
DC
How to build?
DC DC
Fixed packet access wavelengths/circuits, sized for DCn peak sum + pairwise stat-mux mesh (e.g. LSPs)?
22
Ciena Confidential and Proprietary
1) Stat-mux mesh CIRs sized for pairwise peak underutilized core bandwidth, or 2) Stat-mux mesh CIRs sized for pairwise mean packet loss on congested links
DC
DC
how to address the high peak-to-valley pairwise DC-DC bandwidth demand? Build orchestrated Performance on Demand for daily peak sum of actual, smoothed demands!
Provider Cloud OS
Enterprise Data Center
Virtual Machine (VM) applications Server
Billing Systems
Provider Data Center
Network Hypervisor
Control Plane
Ethernet Ethernet
Server
Ethernet
VPLEX
FC
FC FC
SAN
SAN
Cloud Backbone Comparison IP/MPLS vs. Cienas Dynamic Converged Optical Ethernet
Large Carrier Cloud Economic Analysis
Normalized New Equipment Capex to 2015
53% Less
Any-to-Any
CBE CBE
Point-to-Point On-Demand
IP/MPLS Greenfield
24
Beyond MPLS
Optimizing Performance in the Cloud
www.ipanematech.com
2 5
Ipanema Overview
Headquartered in Paris, France
www.ipanematech.com
26
Networks move from MPLS to hybrid MPLS + Internet Internet applications move from recreational to business tools
MPLS
Internet
www.ipanematech.com
27
MPLS / Ethernet
SaaS collaboration
(Office 365, Google Apps, LotusLive)
Telepresence
Cloud Computing
(Cisco, Polycom)
Internet
Unified Communications
(MS Lync, Cisco UC)
www.ipanematech.com
28
Tremendous demand on the access and distribution of data to and from branch locations Business continuity requires making real-time decisions & adjustments to session connectivity
Dynamically manage and control competition between critical and less-critical applications
IaaS/PaaS
Public Internet
MPLS is inadequate
Service providers own only 1-2 access points in a meshed, cloud network CoS cannot address multiple critical application traffic streams
Internationa l Branch Domestic Branch
Stateless QoS will be inadequate; per destination QoS with fairness is required
Application SLAs are required
www.ipanematech.com
29
The Result
Cloud computing shifts application delivery complexity to the network
Cloud Impact
IT
Network
Application
Delivery
Complexity
The Challenge
How do you get full visibility over your global network?
Discover applications and their resources usage
Reduce your WAN bandwidth requirements now and plan for tomorrow
www.ipanematech.com
31
The Ipanema
Autonomic Networking System (ANS )
TM
Autonomic
Global, distributed coordination between appliances guarantees performance
Sense and Respond" dynamically adapts to traffic and network changes Full control requires only 10-20% of sites with an appliance
All-in-one
Tightly coupled Application Visibility, QoS & Control, WAN Optimization and Dynamic WAN Selection
Optimizes data transfers (CIFS...), interactive flows (Citrix...) and real-time flows (Videoconference...)
Service Framework
Unified management GUI for all features
Objective based control enabling global WAN Governance
Multi-tenant platform (SALSA) that scales up to 10MMs users & 100Ks sites
www.ipanematech.com
32
The Autonomic
Internet @
Business VPN
Enterprise Branch
Guaranteed performance for business critical applications based on customer specific SLAs
Complete autonomic application management, visibility and control across an enterprise network based upon global user defined objectives
Dynamic traffic optimization (session-by-session) across hybrid networks; both public or private Control and optimization with absolutely no decisions or actions required; zero demands placed upon IT staff resources Multitenant Central Management System that scales to very large networks and large numbers of customer domains
www.ipanematech.com
33
One to Any
Single Data Center
Some to Many
Multiple Data Centers
Any to Any
Multiple Data Centers
www.ipanematech.com
34
Datacenter #1
Datacenter #2
XaaS
Appliances cooperate to analyze available bandwidth and quality for each path Automatic path selection based on bandwidth and congestion Flows are automatically adjusted to guarantee performance according to individual SLAs
SAP
Sharepoint
MPLS
Internet
Dynamically selecting the network to match performance objectives for each application Paths are instantly adjusted to adapt to any change in network and traffic conditions
Significant Benefits
Use broadband links in branches
Branch Office
www.ipanematech.com
35
SALSA
TM
iPhone application
SAP IP Telephony Telepresence CRM/Citrix CIFS Salesforce Gmail Sharepoint Skype YouTube
Top Top High High Med. Med. Med. Med. Low Low
www.ipanematech.com
36
Fast to deploy
Network Transparency
Easy to operate
Zero day-to-day adjustments: ANS automatically controls application performance across the network
Application performance objectives are automatically enforced for new sites Set SLAs for new applications and automatically enforce them over your global network You need only a few minutes per month to check application SLAs thanks to simple KPIs
37
www.ipanematech.com
Bandwidth management
www.ipanematech.com
38
Q&A Session
Sarah Wallace
Analyst Heavy Reading
Mitchell H. Auster
Senior Advisor Market Development Ciena
David White
Senior VP Global Business Development Ipanema Technologies